Tag Archives: John Rentoul

Diary Blog, 25 July 2026

Morning music

Saturday quiz

Well, this week my 6/10 scored a clear victory over the 3/10 of political journalist John Rentoul. I did not know the answers to questions 2, 6, 7, and 9.

Talking point

That is a screenshot from my one-time Twitter account, which ran from about 2010 to 2018, when a pack of Jews conspired together to mass-report me to Twitter. The result was that I was expelled from Twitter and my account deleted. However, that was a blessing in disguise because, as a result of my Twitter account having been deleted, potential “evidence” against me on mooted (but never made) charges of “incitement to racial hatred” could not be found, and the provenance of alleged tweets could not be established.

Once again, the Jewish/Israel lobby shot itself in the foot, in other words.

I think the point made in the pinned tweet is even more valid in 2026.

“Youngest (and black) professor at Cambridge is a plagiarist”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/07/24/cambridges-diversity-poster-boy-in-plagiarism-row/?recomm_id=d551a520-1bb7-47ec-af05-75f34c451598

[Cambridge “professor” and alleged plagiarist, one Jason Arday]

Even leaving aside the plagiarism, the academic world and society should bin fake academic disciplines such as sociology, particularly the jargon-ridden type so prevalent today. You often find that Jewish individuals are prominent in all that. For example:

Supporters of Prof Arday became aware last year of questions about his academic legitimacy, and responded with furious accusations of racism.

Prof Sir Simon Baron-Cohen, the director of Cambridge’s autism research centre, and cousin of the comedian Sacha Baron-Cohen, and Ricardo Sabates, professor of education, circulated an open letter under the heading: “URGENT PLEASE SIGN ANTI-RACISM LETTER FOR JASON ARDAY.”

[Daily Telegraph]

Tweets seen

Every announcement Burnham has made so far has been an attempt to get voters from various directions onside. Only in time will it become clear that Burnham’s various announcements are 95% hot air. So, yes, he may well be thinking of holding a general election before his government fails on all fronts.

Burnham faces a “Devil’s alternative”, in that he presently has 403 Labour MPs. An election sometime soon would reduce that number considerably, perhaps to 250 or 300. However, to hang on until 2028 or 2029 might result in Labour reducing to 200 or even 100.

[“The Guardian: “Iran, using Chinese satellite imagery and tactics learned from Russia’s war in Ukraine, is bombing American bases and vital infrastructure in the Persian Gulf with increasing accuracy.
Iran has maintained an effective missile capability, which the new leadership is prepared to use.
Iranian missiles have a sophisticated navigation system and simultaneously use American GPS, Chinese BeiDou, and Russian GLONASS for targeting.
“]

It might be more than a joke in 10 years’ time…

I am currently enjoying my week of free access to the Daily Telegraph, my favourite section being the obituaries. However, the reportage and particularly the comment elsewhere in the newspaper is so pro-Jewish lobby, so pro-Israel, that I shall certainly not be paying to continue to read it.

The msm in the UK show a completely one-sided picture of the present conflict; the terror attacks on Russian civilians by the Kiev regime are rarely covered.

I should say that Burnham has until the end of the year to bite the bullet and call a general election; any time after that, and he is toast, Labour is toast.

Stop paying out for migrant invaders (food, housing, transport, NHS/dental, police, prison spaces etc), and stop throwing money at the Jewish/Ukrainian-thug regime in Kiev. Just those two economies would save enormous amounts, enough to fund adult social care for British people, and decent pensions.

Who needs him? Who wants him? Yes, he and his cabal got him elected (just) as MP for some no-hope place near Manchester. Now he suddenly poses as Prime Minister. Completely invalid in real-world politics.

I notice that Reform UK is still ahead of Labour in the opinion polls, though only by a couple of points. However, the Greens are sinking, which promotes Labour and will mitigate electoral losses; Burnham’s convoluted statements seem to have slightly mollified 2024 Green voters (both the Muslims and other non-whites, and the white anti-Israel-ers).

Diary Blog, 11 July 2026

Afternoon music

Stray thought

As soon as it became known that Ann Widdecombe [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Widdecombe] had been killed, and that a suspect had been arrested, the police put out a statement, amplified by the BBC and all other news media, that the detained person was a “White English man“.

How interesting.

When an arrested individual is black, or brown, or a Jew for that matter, the police and news media never proclaim that “a black man has been arrested“, or “a Pakistani has been arrested“. Never.

The System police and msm are simply desperate to make the point that “not all criminals are black or brown; some are White English“…

Pathetic.

In fact, it seems that the “White English” suspect has been released, and with no mention of being released under investigation, so presumably no longer a serious suspect.

I wonder if the police will stick to that policy, and from now on tell the public what race or national background are other arrested persons, in this case or other cases. Ha. Of course not…

Saturday quiz

Well, 7/10 this week, thus trumping the 5/10 scored by political journalist John Rentoul. I did not know the answers to questions 4, 7, and 8 (came close on no. 8, but not close enough).

Bealtaine Cottage

Tweets seen

This is the Kiev regime, the Jew-Zionist/Ukrainian-thug regime supported by NWO/ZOG puppets such as Tobias Ellwood [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobias_Ellwood].

There are huge numbers of fake “Ukrainian refugees” in the UK, too.

Hopeless country, for a number of reasons. It need not be, but at present is.

Evil.

In their hearts, the Africans, most of them, know that they should be ruled by Europeans. They trust the white man to be fair, and to take the right decisions not only for white/European people but also for the blacks, browns etc, and for the animal kingdom too.

[“The UK economy basically works like this:

Get paid £2,000.

Give £900 to a landlord. Give £200 to the council. Give £150 to energy companies. Give £300 to supermarkets. Give £300 to car insurance and fuel.

Spend the rest surviving until next payday.

Then get lectured by someone who bought their house for £37,000 in 1988 about how you need to stop buying coffees and cancel subscriptions.“]

…and, with that socio-economic background, the Daily Mail sees fit to carry a feature by some part-Jew woman about how she has had a nightmare trying to get the right nanny for her offspring…

True. Last week, that was what the Mail gave its readers (few of whom could or would even think of employing a nanny). Unbelievable.

I have forgotten the name of the forgettable woman in question, but she is descended from the Jew barrister, judge (Lord Chief Justice), and politician, Rufus Isaacs, who was made Lord Reading in 1926.

Isaacs was the first commoner to be elevated directly to the marquisate since Wellington. The title was hereditary, which was common at the time, so his descendants also have fake “nobility”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rufus_Isaacs,_1st_Marquess_of_Reading; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Isaacs,_2nd_Marquess_of_Reading; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Isaacs,_3rd_Marquess_of_Reading; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Isaacs,_4th_Marquess_of_Reading.

The last, born in 1942, is apparently a close friend of the present King, and has become an Israeli citizen…

Incidentally, as a former barrister, I was interested to see that the original Isaacs, at peak earning (as a commercial silk), was getting an annual income at the Bar, in the pre-WW1 Edwardian era, of £30,000. That might equate to between £4M and £15M in the money of 2026 (depending on various factors); for one thing, UK income tax in 1906-1908 was only a shilling in the pound (5%), so a small fraction of what might be payable today.

By way of comparison, in 1908, a scullery maid (the least well-paid servant) would get about £12 per year, and a butler perhaps £50 to £70 (taxfree; only incomes above £160 were taxable). In other words, Isaacs was making about 2,000x the income of a scullery maid, and about 500x or more of the income of a butler.

True, domestic servants got free food, lodging, and clothing etc, but even so…

Late tweets

Our animal friends.

Yes but no but…

Were Israel simply a state, such as Switzerland, or Lebanon, then that argument might have force, but Israel is more than a state— it is the centre, or one of the major centres, of a global web.

I have often said that, as a state, as a society, Israel is no worse, in overall terms, than other Middle Eastern states; indeed, in many respects better. However, its status and existence emboldens Jews in states such as the USA, UK, France etc.

Late music

Diary Blog, 6 July 2026

Morning music

[The Motherland Calls, Volgograd]

Tweets seen

Quite a few unexpected statistics there.

Well, that’s comforting…to know that, with actual crime rocketing, and real freedom declining, the police stop many people supposedly for no reason. The Palestine flag had nothing to do with it, I suppose.

Those police would be even more “busy” were they to go to parts of North London where Israeli flags proliferate, and where private Jewish police drive around in marked cars almost indistinguishable from real police cars, the occupants deliberately dressed as if real police.

Starmer— Labour Friends of Israel. Andy Burnham— Labour Friends of Israel (since 2015). David Miliband— at present, not a member of Labour Friends of Israel, supposedly, but there again, he is a Jew anyway, and associated with NWO/ZOG “interventionist” policy positions.

What the UK is getting with Burnham is a rehash of Blair/Brown-ism. You only have to look at the major figures already appointed.

The UK Government, and its military and security/intelligence orgs, are all themselves working to an NWO/ZOG agenda, rather than for the good of the British people.

My policy preferences: UK to leave NATO, get rid of American strategic air bases and other facilities in the UK, then cultivate far closer relations with Russia. Obviously, also, cut off all aid to the Kiev regime, and remove most if not all Ukrainian fake “refugees” from the UK.

No doubt true, but most people who vote Reform UK do so not, primarily, because they support Reform UK as such, but because they want to hit out at the System parties, both Lab and Con (LibDems are an irrelevance, a default-protest party led by a rather unpleasant and self-satisfied clown).

The ultimate consequences of such provocation are likely to be the large-scale destruction of Western and Central Europe.

[Berlin 1945: Zhukov inspecting the ruins of the Reichstag]

Starmer/Burnham-Labour planning to control YouTube (more)…

Talking point

Late tweets

So much for the idea that the present regime in Teheran is on the brink of falling…

Forget whether the entity is based in the US or UK. Concentrate on the main point— the (((ethnicity))) of the controlling individuals.

Both Reform and Restore, though they have their uses, are failing to hit the spot ideologically.

I do not accept the present Pope as genuine (though I should add that I am not Roman Catholic anyway).

Late music

Diary Blog, 27 June 2026

Morning music

Saturday quiz

Well, an unusual week, in which political journalist John Rentoul scored higher than me— 7/10 as against my 6/10.

I did not know the answers to questions 2, 3, 4, and 7, though in fact I had heard of no. 2 (but forgotten it), and should also have got no. 3, but did not.

Three years ago

Saw this, from exactly 3 years ago:

Dutch family bought a house in rural Russia for less than £20,000

Certainly puts to shame the American and British ones I have seen.

Tweets seen

As was inevitable, Burnham turns out to be just another System puppet. I expected nothing other.

The corruptors of our legislature, as well as the general society.

Josh Simons: Jewish or, maybe, half-Jew; former Director of anti-Corbyn pro-Jewish-lobby and pro-Israel organization, Labour Together; former Chair of Labour Friends of Israel; met his wife at Harvard, but her exact provenance is unknown; was MP at Makerfield but gave up his seat so that Andy Burnham could be parachuted into Downing Street to replace Starmer-stein (because Starmer had lost the confidence of the voters). Now Burnham’s Chief of Staff.

Join the dots.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Simons

Jesus H. Christ! How long can it be before some species of civil or social war breaks out in our poor country?

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15933845/Shabana-Mahmood-unveils-new-plan-bring-thousands-asylum-seekers-Britain-community-sponsorship-scheme.html

Exactly what this blog has been predicting for years, at least 2 years if not longer— “asylum” and other claims rubberstamped before the bastards ever get here. The other, similar, scam is of course “closing asylum hotels”…yes, because the migrant-invaders are being placed in council or private rental property, while British people languish endlessly on housing waiting lists.

Apart from anything else, everyone knows (even the hardened pro-immigration drones) that virtually all the immigrants are parasites, and even if a small number are not, their extended families are or will be. A significant number are also, or will be, criminally-inclined, one way or another, and a very small (?) but not insignificant number will be either terrorists, terrorist sympathisers and possibly facilitators, and/or dangerous mentally-disturbed crazies.

One of the first conditions of happiness is that the link between man and nature shall not be broken.” [Tolstoy]

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martinsell_Hill]

Never believe a word “they” say.

More music

More tweets seen

Much depends on what happens with both Reform UK and Restore Britain. Even if voters are voting against some party (eg Lab), and so voting elsewhere (eg Reform, Restore), they still, most of them, will not vote for parties that are an absolute shambles.

The System may foment a war with Russia —or create a pre-conflict period— thus also providing the excuse to “postpone” a general election. Were that to happen, though, the vanguard of the British people might have to rise up, seriously, against the System (and I am not talking about such stupid and trivial acts as throwing wheelie bins at police, or taking part in pathetic and tiny street protests).

The reality is that Wikipedia has for years been infiltrated by Jews intent on spreading Jewish/Zionist, including pro-Israel, propaganda.

Below, a tweet from several years ago, published by the liars and perjurers known as “Campaign Against Antisemitism”. Note that the “CAA” wanted (and wants) to recruit Jews with their own Wikipedia accounts, so that Wikipedia will not flag the fact that (((their))) “edits” (i.e. vandalistic edits) are part of a Jew/Zionist campaign; those edits will appear as if from individuals, rather than from a Jew-Zionist conspiracy.

Yes but no but…

Reform’s problem is that its policy at present is to allow to stay in the UK all those so far granted “indefinite leave to remain”, and all those granted ILR right up to whenever (if ever) Reform forms a government. Thus 80% —even of beach-landing— migrant-invaders, and almost all “legal” migrants, will not be affected. Millions. Tens of millions.

On those premises, the only reason to vote Reform is that it is marginally better than the (other) System parties.

Not good enough.

I hope that Reform and Restore can at least move the Overton Window, and also trample down Lab and Con, thus making it easier for social nationalism to rise up, so —to that extent— they have that potential utility, but Reform at least seems to want a society composed of quite similar populations to the present.

Not good enough.

Finally, the Jewish/Zionist/Israeli influence is already embedded in Reform.

Not good enough.

Take away Zelensky’s ricebowl.

GB News, owned by the (((you-know-who))) element…

Late tweets

Sophie Meaden— a young Valkyrie.

Their malice and destructiveness is endless (unless they are ended).

Late music

[Vicente Romero Redondo, Mediterranean Moonlight]

Diary Blog, 13 June 2026

Afternoon music

Saturday quiz

Well, this week 7/10 (two of which being “educated” guesses), thus trumping the 3/10 scored by political journalist John Rentoul. I did not know the answers to questions 4, 5, and 7.

Tweets seen

Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan. A global conspiracy.

[Kreisleitertagung auf der Ordensburg Vogelsang vom 22.-29.04.1937]
[girls of the BDM (Bund Deutscher Madel) riding in a German forest, 1930s]
[Hitler signs autographs for some young supporters near Berchtesgaden, 1930s]
[“The Fuhrer as friend of animals“]

Should read “...Muslims and Jews and the government“, of course…

Sophie Meaden. A young Valkyrie.

The bad-joke “Talk TV” online-only “television” channel, which not only crowed along with the malicious lying and perjuring Jews of the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism” after my 2023 free speech trial and subsequent 2024 sentencing, but tweeted (completely wrongly and, indeed, libellously) that I had been “imprisoned“. In fact the penalty imposed on me was both a financial one (amounting to over £700), and also a fairly brief (in the event) and not too onerous “community order”: see

“Talk TV” is an Israel-lobby front, and often invites the liar and perjurer Stephen Silverman, of the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” fake “charity”, a volunteer arm (some of them are paid, in fact) of the Israeli Embassy in London.

Reverting to the Reform/Restore situation, my attitude to Restore is not very different to how I see Reform, i.e. a useful tool in moving the overall Overton Window, meaning moving the general weight or bias of public opinion. Even if Reform or Restore were to win a general election, the (((usual fix))) is already in, certainly in Reform, and possibly soon in Restore.

What matters is not the next GE, or which party “wins”, but what happens when the party that wins that GE is unable to improve the degenerating situation in this country, and so loses both credibility and control. Then…

Good point(s).

More good points. See also:

More tweets

For over 30 years, living standards in the corrupt and shambolic Ukrainian fake state have been declining. Only now, and only in the regions under Russian rule, are they starting to improve.

[“NEW: Bloomberg Saturday read

— Andy Burnham is planning to move quickly after Makerfield to secure a coronation. His supporters think John Healey’s resignation kills off Keir Starmer’s chances of survival. They think Wes Streeting and Al Carns don’t have the numbers, and that Burnham can quickly get 250+ Labour MPs and most of the cabinet to back him.

— Starmer insists he’ll fight, but the question is what the cabinet does. Burnham’s supporters want them to tell the PM to agree a handover. Before Healey resigned, Starmer’s allies hoped he could battle on because most of the cabinet would back him to stay. Aides suggest the calculus is changing and Healey’s brutal exit makes it more likely they tell Starmer it’s over.

— Even Starmer loyalists are very critical of the PM. They wish he’d been bolder, found the defence money from welfare, net zero or elsewhere, and sacked Ed Miliband. Several allies say they can’t believe Miliband and Shabana Mahmood (who they say privately plotted with Burnham and Miliband to oust Starmer) are still in the cabinet, but Healey isn’t. One says that’s the final evidence of his lack of authority, political judgment and decision-making ability.

— Starmer’s relationship with Rachel Reeves has been tested to the limit. Her resistance led Starmer to renege on his Munich speech and overrule Healey and Jonathan Powell. She effectively buried his survival strategy of focusing on security. Reeves allies argue it’s her job to make the numbers add up and if Starmer wanted more money for defence he could have imposed more departmental cuts but was unwilling.

— Burnham will not keep Reeves on as his chancellor, despite her allies pitching her to stay. Reappointing her would not be the change he’s promising, one Burnham supporter says. They say they spoke to Reeves around the locals and came away believing she would help them persuade Starmer to go, but she didn’t follow through.

— The turmoil is rattling UK allies. European diplomats contacted British counterparts in recent days complaining about the uncertainty over the UK’s defence spending plans, the slow pace of the uplift and Healey’s departure. They’ve also asked for information about Burnham’s plans for foreign policy and defence but got no answer.

— If Burnham does become PM he’ll face the same problems. His critics say he’s never uttered a word of substance on defence or foreign policy, shows no interest in it and has no plan. It is not impossible that in the next few months the British PM has to join negotiations with Putin over Ukraine. “Can you imagine Burnham doing that?” asks one official, especially with Powell likely to leave with Starmer.

— Starmer’s chaos also distracted from what might otherwise have been a bad week for Burnham. He got away with his WASPI gaffe thanks to Healey. Labour MPs are also critical of his plans on immigration. One aide said his proposal to end asylum hotel contracts and move responsibility for housing migrants to local authorities is amateurish and toxic.

— It all leaves Labour MPs in a state of total despair. Starmer looks finished but Burnham has no obvious plan and keeps making basic mistakes that foreshadow another troubled premiership, one said. If Burnham loses Makerfield, Labour appears to have no other options.“]

Interesting, but fails to make the point that any money spent on “defence” at this point is simply money thrown away.

The “threats” to our country and society do not come from Russia, not at all (that’s just msm propaganda nonsense) but from demographic change, the change from being a relatively civilized white European society to a multikulti dystopian mess, an approaching near-anarchy made worse by falling living standards and migration invasion.

Our animal friends.

Ed Miliband. That crazy Jew.

Incidentally, I have never found an answer as to where the family money came from. I have tried to analyze it on the blog previously. We are told that the Miliband father arrived in the UK during the early stages of WW2, young and as a “penniless” “refugee” who had lost his family wealth by reason of the “Nazis”. However, not long after WW2, in the 1950s, certainly by the early 1960s, the family (mother was also supposedly a “refugee”) was in a house in expensive Primrose Hill, and then in —really?— The Boltons, Kensington, one of the most expensive addresses in the country.

Did the Milibands, like so many Jews, have money secreted overseas/offshore? We do not know. What about today, in 2026?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Miliband

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marion_Kozak

I remember that, sometime around 2010 or 2012, Jeremy Paxman interviewed Ed Miliband, and made an oblique reference to the Miliband family wealth, but Miliband deflected and tried to laugh it off.

Many of Britain’s ultra-wealthy have considerable funds offshore.

Actually, on a personal and not directly-related point, I remember being told, prior to a flying visit to Liechtenstein in 2002, that the person I was flying out to see (you have to fly to Zurich and then drive to Vaduz, which takes another ~2-hours), a quintessentially-English-named Mr. Jeeves, who was in the offshore industry and was also the Honorary Consul (British Consul) in Liechtenstein, was also an agent of, or at least source for, SIS.

Mr. Jeeves apparently dealt with large amounts of offshore (i.e. tax-avoiding) monies on behalf of some very or ultra-wealthy British people, including the then Queen (Elizabeth II) and Mick Jagger. So I was told, anyway.

Looking up today, online, the global Jeeves Group, though, I notice that the person I went to see in 2002 is not now directly involved in operating the organization; he and his brother were at least in their sixties, I should imagine, and may well be deceased, 24 years after I met one of them.

Wouldn’t those “antifa” cretins get a massive shock if [REDACTED BY REASON OF UK POLICE-STATE CENSORSHIP]…

[“The British People are fully on board with deporting all illegal migrants. Good.

Now it’s time to turn to the reality that legal migration is the far bigger problem.

There are approx 14 million third-world descent migrants in Great Britain.

If we do not urgently reverse legal migration, we will soon become a minority in our homeland. We are already a minority in a quarter of schools.

Some might say that remigration is extreme, but I would argue that being willing to give up our only homeland is far, far more extreme.

Without the Native British People, there is no Britain.“]

Losing“? That boat sailed long ago, Goodwin. A major factor has been the promotion of mass immigration for 80+ years (mostly, though not entirely, by the Jewish element in politics, law, and the mainstream media).

Only wading through very unpleasant swamps will now save the British people, and I doubt that Reform UK is up to what may need to be done.

[“What’s living in the UK like? I’ll tell you. In the last week alone we have had to process:

-an attempted beheading by an illegal migrant from Sudan in Belfast
-while still trying to make sense of a boy, Henry Nowak, being stabbed to death while police were more anxious about allegations of “racism” than trying to save his life

-then we learn children in Scotland were assaulted by Bulgarians while the police didn’t believe them either
-while reading that a vulnerable 18-year-old was rped by an asylum-seeker from Pakistan -while an asylum-seeker from Iraq got only 6 years for rpe
-while an Iraqi national, was found guilty of eight counts of r*pe and grooming children as young as 12
-and his friend from Iran who arrived illegally skipped bail and is on the run
-and now we learn that a teenage girl has been stabbed in the neck by no doubt “a local man” in Burnley.

That’s one week in the UK. Oh, and the Left say talking about all this is “divisive”, they blame social media and Elon Musk, and local councils have told us not to fly our national flag because it might “intimidate” migrants. One week. The UK.”]

A couple of point: first, the “Bulgarians” mentioned were almost certainly Gypsies from Bulgaria, not ethnic Bulgarians. Bulgarians, like Romanians, are often tarred, very wrongly, with the brush that should be reserved for the Gypsy element from both countries.

Second, why does Goodwin never mention the fact that Jews such as now-dismissed p/t judge, barrister Simon Myerson of Leeds, have actually set up “charities” to import more Afghans etc?

In fact, Goodwin always avoids criticism of Israel and of any Jews (with the exception of the Green Party leader, Zack Polanski, but Polanski is one of those Jews other Jews love to hate).

In my view, one element that really does need to be addressed, urgently, by Government in the UK is not black or brown (etc)— the nasty Irish-origined tinker/”traveller” element. In fact, properly “addressing” that problem might encourage some of the blacks and browns (etc) to depart “voluntarily”.

Apocalypse Now

Saw a long recording of the final director’s cut of the famous film, Apocalypse Now. More than impressive, and makes much more sense than the usual much-cut-down version that I have seen in the past.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocalypse_Now

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocalypse_Now#Apocalypse_Now_Final_Cut

Quite many films have been butchered; to what extent, you only understand once you see fuller versions: The Wicker Man (1973) is far far better in the rather longer versions. I once had a copy of the Director’s Cut version.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wicker_Man

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wicker_Man#Director’s_cut

Same goes for Taxi Driver:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxi_Driver

One film that I thought only just made sense when I first saw it in France is Les Rivieres pourpres. I read later that the director had cut out a high proportion of the film as originally made; as far as I know, no longer cut exists in the public domain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crimson_Rivers

A great pity.

Late tweets

Look at them. As I suspected, not “Bulgarians” but Gypsies from Bulgaria.

Now, those little Scottish girls have been vindicated, the Gypsies convicted, and Police Scotland (and Humza Yusaf) shamed (yet again).

All the msm etc are talking about the Makerfield by-election as if the whole future of the UK rests on it. No, because even if Burnham wins, which is now probable though not certain, he has, and Labour has, nothing much in the tank. Same-old, really.

Good point.

People are getting desperate for a real Britain and a real British political vehicle. Unconsciously, they want social nationalism but are, by reason of a century of mostly Jewish anti-“Nazi” propaganda, mostly completely unaware of that.

I believe the graph. When I was in the Caribbean, I was told that, if a local (i.e. black) man marries a woman with existing teenage or even pre-teen daughters, it is almost expected that the girls come with their mother as a kind of sexual package deal for the man.

Incidentally, why do so many “woke” cretins not understand “per capita“? Must be an educational failure.

Not hard to believe at all. It is simply that Starmer-stein has outlived his usefulness by reason of not only his own incompetence but also that of his entire Labour Friends of Israel Cabinet.

By reason of Starmer’s failing credibility, the organ-grinders need a new monkey to draw in the punters…Arise, Andy Burnham…

Oh, I see that System mouthpiece and “asset” Paul Mason is there too. What a surprise…(use the search box on the blog to see my assessments of Mason).

Always. The “Campaign Against Antisemitism”, for example, has repeated “form” for claiming thousands on the streets at their events, when the true number has, at times, been no more than 100 or even 50.

I repost that tweet despite the individual in question having repeatedly tweeted against me a decade ago. #MoralHighGround.

Late music

Diary Blog, 6 June 2026

Morning music

[The Wicker Man (1973)]

Talking point

Saturday quiz

Well, 8/10 this week, thus again trumping political journalist John Rentoul, who scored 6/10. I did not know the answers to questions 8 and 9.

Tweets seen

Certainly true of the UK, France, and Germany.

The BBC had one of its goblin drones on BBC News this morning, “explaining” that “of course” the recent Southampton murderer, though a Sikh, was “not an immigrant” and is “British“…

Not in any real sense.

For me, there are several types of migrant-invader, among which, the “illegals”, the superficially “legal” and, also, those born here but to those of non-European/non-white parents (either one parent or both).

Incidentally, I still oppose the Southampton protests (and all similar protests), particularly if they are violent or forceful, not because I would —under all circumstances— oppose such protests but because, as matters stand, the protesters have not the numbers, leadership, or discipline to achieve victory in the field.

More music

[Kreisleitertagung auf der Ordensburg Vogelsang vom 22.-29.04.1937]
[tank commander of SS-Totenkopf (3rd Division Panzer) rides through the streets of Kharkov in 1943; note that he wears the Iron Cross; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Battle_of_Kharkov]

More tweets

Fact.

The decline in fertility across the world is a stunning but relatively little-discussed fact.

I think, subject to correction, that that news about India means that the only remaining parts of the world where the populations are growing via births, rather than from mass migration, are Pakistan, Bangladesh, and parts of Africa. Unfortunately, these are some of the most backward, and least useful, people on Earth, and are also those who, among others, are invading Europe (and elsewhere) on the mass scale at the present time.

[Germany 1945: “We are fighting for the future of our children!“]

The population of the world now stands at about double what it was in 1970. There may, quite soon, soon be a collapse in the population of the world. If, then, the European peoples can reassert their supremacy, the whole world will benefit and move into a new age, aided by European-controlled AI and robotics.

Our numbers, as Europeans, or European-origined people living elsewhere in the world, are small compared to the non-whites in the world, true, but our historical armies, navies and air forces can be replaced by huge new robot armies, and by drones in the air and at sea.

This is no longer science fiction but, germinally, everyday fact. Look at the war in Ukraine, and what is happening in the Middle East.

Europe can come back, regenerate. We can come back. This is now possible.

More tweets

[“Do I agree with him? No. Do I want another Reform MP in Parliament? Categorically not. The abortion stuff particularly was a disgrace. BUT he certainly did handle himself quite well on QT and I said so and he’s a lot more personable than most Reform candidates and I had a very extreme one in 2024. Suspect there will be some shy Kenyonites. Suspect it will be closer than people think. Whatever I think about Reform, Labour deserves to get battered for calling this by-election. Some of the worst optics in living memory.“]

Even a former “Conservative” lady (ex-wife of a former Con Party MP), and with some very odd and badly-thought-out “antifascist” opinions, rather likes Kenyon, the Reform UK candidate at Makerfield.

Kenyon has made some vulgar remarks (mainly about Carol Vorderman, who is quite vulgar enough already), but is a genuine local person, and not at all like Andy Burnham, who is a pro-immigration and anti-free speech careerist and freeloader.

Labour seem to be slightly ahead at Makerfield, ahead of Reform (Restore also doing well in third place, and the Green loonie nowhere), but the game is far from over. Maybe Reform can still pull it off.

They call that “democracy”, it seems. Farcical.

For once, I agree with him, except that the suggested database needs to go back to 1967, and not be limited to those with Israeli or dual Israeli-UK nationality.

Jews go from the UK to be trained in the use of weapons, explosives, knives, and unarmed martial arts such as the brutal streetfighting techniques of Krav Maga [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krav_Maga].

In effect, such “British” Jews are trained potential terrorists, albeit that they have not, most of them, been activated, but are, effectively, “sleeper agents”. They form a potential pool of active agents, or support-cadres, for Israeli Intelligence agencies such as MOSSAD and Aman and, in times of trouble, a pool of potential active urban guerrillas under direct Israeli control.

A real British government would take the necessary measures to contain, at the least, this potentially dangerous group.

Talking point

Applicable to many institutions and socio-political problems in the UK right now; the NHS, for one.

More tweets

[“In 2005, after two British Special Air Service operators were captured in Iraq and approval for a rescue was refused, a lieutenant colonel allegedly disobeyed orders and sent about 20 SAS personnel to retrieve them. When the government pushed back, the entire Special Air Service reportedly threatened to resign en masse.”]

Sometimes, “the rules” laid down by those “on high” have to be bent or broken. Also, if paradoxically, what makes a society work, whether the society of a nation-state, or that of an elite military unit, is mutual loyalty. Without that, the whole thing falls to pieces, as it has been doing in the UK for half a century.

Cathy Newman is a typical UK msm termite, working away to destroy our society (while being paid hundreds of thousands of pounds per year for doing so). Typical pseudo-“liberal” multikulti hypocrite.

Incidentally, while I do not believe that non-Europeans should hold any political office in this country, it would be dishonest of me not to recognize Zia Yusuf’s political skill.

[“Looking to make contact with the prisoners or families of those charged and imprisoned in relation to the Southampton unrest. We still have money in Patriotic Alternative’s Political Prisoner Fund and we can support families or dependents with £1000 per child, just as we did with those after Southport. Please get in touch with me here or at hello@patrioticalternative.org.uk.”]

Never forget “the men behind the wire”, even if you do not agree with their tactics or timing.

Over the past 14 years, my respect for the police of the UK has slid from fairly high to near-zero, by reason of the way the Jew-Zionist lobby (mainly the liars and perjurers of the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism”) have managed to demand or whine and so get the police to do what they want, most of the time.

The same is true of the Crown Prosecution Service [CPS], except that I have always had little time for them anyway.

…and completely useless black/brown parasites (there are a tiny number of exceptions).

That idiot is as bad, in his own way, as Starmer-stein.

Late tweets

One of the big questions is as to whether Restore (not mentioned in that poll) and Reform are fishing in the same pool, or whether one (Restore?) or both are, or will be, able to get usual non-voters, those disgusted by the choice previously available, out to vote. In other words, is the “nationalist” vote around 30%, or could it be 35%, 40%, or even 50%?Open question.

Taking that opinion poll as stated though, it translates to a Commons with about 378 Reform MPs (excellent majority), LibDems 60 (very weak official Opposition), Lab 56, Greens 54, SNP 44, and Cons 39 [etc].

Incidentally, on those figures, Labour would lose both Holborn and St. Pancras (Starmer’s seat) and Makerfield (which may or may not be Andy Burnham’s new seat); the former to the Greens, the latter to Reform.

Let us say, though, that Restore fights all of the GE seats contested by Reform (and the System parties). Even were Restore to win almost no seats, that would badly damage Reform, almost certainly. A hung Parliament might be the result.

[“Latest on Mandelson/McSweeney messages:

  • Downing Street briefed journalists the messages relating to the 5 September reshuffle had been withheld at the request of the Metropolitan Police. But today the Met have told the Mail on Sunday this is untrue, and they did not ask for the messages to be held back
  • Two of the unpublished messages from Mandelson to McSweeney reportedly relate to Darren Jones and Peter Kyle. Both of them were subsequently promoted in that reshuffle
  • On 27 February Mandelson accompanied Keir Starmer to a meeting at the Washington offices of Palantir. No minutes were kept of the meeting, and it was not included in Starmer’s official schedule. The Mail on Sunday has learnt that a week after Starmer returned from Washington Cabinet Ministers received an instruction from No.10 to meet with Palantir representatives.“]

Well…Palantir is the sinister Israeli/Jew organization getting hold of confidential data about UK citizens. Starmer-stein is a creature of the Jewish/Israeli lobby. The same is true of Mandelson, Morgan McSweeney, Darren Jone, and Peter Kyle.

This is a complete Jewish/Israeli set-up, and connected with the Epstein scandal.

Well, you know what to do about it. There are precedents.

Late music

[“The Motherland Calls“, Volgograd; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Motherland_Calls]

Diary Blog, 30 May 2026

Morning music

Saturday quiz

Well, this week a clear victory over political journalist John Rentoul; he scored 3/10, but I trumped that with 6/10. I did not know the answers to questions 5, 8, 9, and 10.

Talking point

Utter barbarity.

Talking point

Tweets seen

How is this “news”? It has been obvious to all for weeks.

When I had a Twitter account (the Jew-Zionist lobby had me expelled in 2018 after a long and conspiratorial campaign), I found that practically all the “hate” directed against me came from Israel-fanatic Jews, together with a few non-Jew but vicious and/or mentally unstable types such as fake “doctor” Louise Raw, a loonie from Manchester calling himself “DaveAFAF” and a half-crazy part-Jew psychiatrist called Tim G. Stevens of Essex (Epping Forest area), most of whom were also pro the Jewish lobby and Israel.

One especially egregious one was minor Jewish academic Ben Gidley, who was obsessed with me, my views, my Twitter account etc, and set up a number of pseudonymous Twitter accounts (“BobfromBrockley”, “IntheSoupAgain”, “AntiNazisUnited” etc) in order to troll night and day. Eventually, I worked out his real identity, as did, not long afterward, others such as the journalist Peter Hitchens. Gidley had to shut up and go away after that.

Most, in fact almost all, of the vitriol came from Jews, several of which have now, however, died.

See also:

One has to ask why Jews have been expelled, historically, from over 100 states and territories.

Wall. Squad. End.

Numberplate Enthusiasts’ Club

More tweets seen

See also:

[“The Fuhrer as friend of animals“]

Upsetting to think that some (I hope only a small minority of backward) Americans hurt these lovely creatures.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opossum

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_opossum

I have commented previously on the fact that in the UK we are now moving rapidly to a non-civic society, i.e. one where people vote (whether in elections or when on juries) according to racial and cultural loyalties. Call it the “O.J. Simpson syndrome” if you like.

I fully support the jury system, in principle, and was myself a practising barrister for a number of years (1992-2008, based in London and later Exeter when not overseas), but the jury system falls to pieces in a “multicultural” society. The same is true of voting “democracy”, and a police force that can be relied upon.

Talking point

At various times in history, states have promulgated “sumptuary laws”, defined by Wikipedia as follows:

Sumptuary laws (from Latin sūmptuāriae lēgēs) are laws that regulate consumption.[1] Black’s Law Dictionary defines them as “Laws made for the purpose of restraining luxury or extravagance, particularly against inordinate expenditures for apparel, food, furniture, or shoes, etc.”[2] Historically, they were intended to regulate and reinforce social hierarchies and morals through restrictions on clothing, food, and luxury expenditures, often depending on a person’s social rank.

Societies have employed sumptuary laws for various purposes. They were used to try to regulate the balance of trade by limiting the market for expensive imported goods. They made it easy to identify social status and privilege, and as such could be used for social discrimination and to stabilize social hierarchies.[3][1] They could also be used to prevent, or at least reduce, opportunities for political bribery and corruption.

The laws often prevented commoners from imitating the appearance of aristocrats and could be used to stigmatize disfavoured groups. In cities of the Late Middle Ages, sumptuary laws were instituted as a way for the nobility to limit the conspicuous consumption of the prosperous bourgeoisie. Bourgeois subjects as wealthy as or wealthier than the nobility could undermine the latter’s presentation as powerful and legitimate rulers. This could call into question their ability to control and defend their fiefs, thus inspiring traitors and rebels. Such laws continued to be used for these purposes well into the 17th century.”

[Wikipedia]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumptuary_law

I think there are cogent arguments for similar laws in the UK at present. Let’s stamp on the nouveaux riches types (indeed, all of the excessively-rich) and those aping them and their lifestyles, including “influencers” and “celebrities” of one kind and another.

Society needs calm and reason, and a less-materialistic ethos.

Plain living and high thinking.

More tweets

[“BREAKING: its been revealed that Andy Burnham snapped up an ex council flat in Kennington for just £215,000 in 2005 while serving as an MP.

He then happily billed taxpayers for the mortgage interest payments because the rules let him get away with it.

That same flat is now worth 480000 to 500000 pounds and he rents it out while insisting the income barely covers his costs and he makes no profit.

Yet this is the same man demanding rent freezes council housing takeovers and lower rents for ordinary people.

Pure hypocrisy from a classic Westminster grifter feathering his own nest on the back of the system he loves to lecture everyone else about.“]

They destroy everything.

Monkeyworld UK. It really is time to recognize that most of them not only cannot create anything worthwhile, and certainly not a better society, but cannot even live in our existing society (even as parasites). Pests. Unwanted pests.

I had heard previously of how cruel some of the Israeli Jews are to donkeys. Arabs in Egypt can also be callous towards donkeys, if not actively cruel and, as early as 1914, British people set up charities such as the Brooke Hospital to care for the donkeys of the Middle East; the Arabs either could not or would not. However, there is that perversity in the Jews which we see in other areas, such as their cowardly sadism towards children and other defenceless people in Gaza and elsewhere.

Donkeys are, after cats, my favourite animals. Hard to understand why some lower types would harm them, but that is something one learns with life experience(s)— people are not created equal, in any sense.

Talking point

That was first posted by me about 10 years ago, on Twitter (the Jewish lobby goblins had me expelled from Twitter in 2018).

10,000, too! There are “only” 18,000 active barristers in England and Wales anyway, and that is about 3x the number of 50 years ago. “More will mean worse“, as they say…

Incidentally, re that tendentious “Readers added context” note, it all depends on what is “officially” called a “hate crime”…

[“Living in the UK is now incredibly radicalising. This is what we have seen in the last two weeks alone: a gang of Afghans who entered the country illegally on small boats and lorries have been charged with 40 child sex offences: two Muslim men who visibly assaulted police officers have been let off from a further trial; a small boat migrant living in a taxpayer-funded hotel was found guilty of sexually assaulting two women outside nightclubs; an Islamist terrorist who plotted to blow up an army base is being released early; a white British boy was handcuffed by police and bled to death while saying “I can’t breathe” after the Sikh boy who murdered him claimed the white boy was “racist”; a Muslim man who called to “behead the Jews” was released on bail while white British people who tweeted their complaints about immigration have been jailed; a group of [“traveller” Irish tinker] boys who gang-r*ped and filmed two girls escaped jail and were given fines of £26; a new study found that for every ONE young British person who is hired in Britain TWENTY-SEVEN young migrants from outside Europe; Islamic prayers are now routinely used to open local councils; another 1,000 illegals arrived on small boats in one weekend; it was revealed the First Lady of Sierra Leone owns a council flat in London while 1.3 million people wait on the social housing list; new data revealed that last year alone 800,000 migrants arrived in Britain while 246,000 British people left, half of whom are aged 16-34 years old; the country’s birth-rate collapsed to a new low of 1.39 while politicians refuse to even talk about how to support British families; a grooming gang in Dewsbury was jailed for nearly 300 years combined after assaulting children as young as 12. Oh, and the entire political class had a nervous breakdown when the British people decided to peacefully protest over what is happening to their country on the streets of their capital city. As I say, radicalising.“]

Late music

Diary Blog, 23 May 2026

Morning music

[Harriet Lawless, End of a Summer’s Day in St. James’s Park]

Saturday quiz

Well, a modest 4/10 this week, the same as political journalist John Rentoul. I knew only the answers to questions 1,2, 3, and 8.

Tweets seen

From the blog, a year ago

Today, I happened to see, from almost exactly a year ago, a blog post dated 24 May 2025, and referring to a Dunkirk commemoration :

“…Ironic. The System politicians and msm recently lined up to mention the possibility that Britain might have been invaded in 1940, yet pretended not to notice a real invasion that is happening right under their noses, and literally under the noses of the spectators of that Dunkirk tribute show.

As to why Britain was never actually under real threat of invasion in 1940, there were numerous reasons. First of all, Hitler wanted to rule much of the world in alliance with the British Empire; he did not want war with Britain; Britain, i.e. Neville Chamberlain’s Cabinet, declared war on Germany in 1939 and, after mid-1940, his successor, Churchill, was unwilling to consider an armistice.

Hitler was weighing what became the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. He did not wan t a two-front war.

Hitler allowed most of the British Army soldiers in the Dunkirk area to escape (my own maternal grandfather one of them). Hitler refused to allow the Luftwaffe and tank columns to destroy that army, the remnants of the British Expeditionary Force or BEF. German ground forces were halted outside Dunkirk by Hitler’s own order (Fuhrerbefehl).

Secondly, the Germans never had enough barge and ship capacity to ferry an army of sufficient size across the Channel.

Thirdly, the Luftwaffe could not guarantee air superiority; neither could the Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine much defend any forces ferried across.

Reverting to today’s real invasion, it continues, day after day, and nothing of importance is being done to stop, or even slow, the flow.

If only Britain had been in loose alliance with the Reich. We would have been, today, the rulers of much of the world, and that world would have been a better and happier place by reason of it. The usual evil (((influence))) prevented it from happening. Instead, we sit on our small and beleaguered island, invaded daily by trash from all over the world, we are individually poorer with every passing day and, with every passing day, our society falls apart, more and more.

I wonder how long it will be before there is little that is worthwhile left. At the age of 68, I may not see the ultimate depths of the degradation of Britain, thank God, and I am doing what little I presently can, in my present situation, to avoid the catastrophe, but see around me a society running around like a headless chicken, scarcely aware that it is already, in effect, dead, or at least mortally wounded.

I may, by Grace of God, be able to do more. We shall see. That is a matter of Fate. If the existing society cannot be saved, it may be that seeds can be planted in the rotting corruption, seeds which may germinate at a later time in history.

[from this blog, a post dated 24 May 2023: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2025/05/24/diary-blog-24-may-2025-including-thoughts-about-israel-antisemitism-and-the-continuing-israeli-war-crimes-in-gaza/]

The System commends the planned resistance to an invasion that never happened (in 1940), but deplores even verbal resistance to the gradual invasion of our day, invasion by “small boats”, by “legal” influxes, and by births to non-Europeans already in the UK.

Late tweets

That man did not expressly mention the “JQ”, but how could he, in the climate of self-censorship the Jew-Zionists have imposed on the UK via monkeys-on-sticks political puppets such as Starmer-stein?

Burnham is just a marginally less compromised version of all the fake-Labour politicos, nothing more, nothing really genuine. As Hodges said, Reform would still win this easily, were it not for the Restore candidature.

What I take away from that poll is that, in that constituency, in 2026, about 47% of the voters are at least conservative-national, even if not social-national. At a guess, though, about 30%-40% of the voters are social-national, and would support a social-national government whether it won elections or simply seized power some other way. Another ~10%, maybe more, would also play ball.

Unfortunately, the usual (((poison))) has already been injected into Reform, and the same, at a lower dosage, into Restore. Neither are the answer to the country’s problems.

It is almost funny. The security organs —the police, MI5, SIS counter-espionage etc— put out huge efforts to catch “Russian agents” in a kind of Cold War “cosplay”, and put out more huge effort trying to identify and catch potential “terrorists”, those who might set off a bomb somewhere or other, or stab people in the street, yet all the time, in the background, the migration-invasion is changing the UK day by day, over time completely, and it is happening via “legal immigration”, illegal “small boat” invasion, and via invasion by births.

Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan. The naval and para-naval forces of the System are ferrying in the untermenschen. This is a conspiracy, and one operating in plain view.

Diary Blog, 16 May 2026

Morning music

Saturday quiz

Well, this week 5/10, thus again beating political journalist John Rentoul, who scored a poor 1/10. I knew the answers to questions 1, 5, 6, 8, and 10.

Tweets seen

More “holocaust” fakery and farrago (via Twitter/X “community notes” from (((the usual suspects)))…

The msm scribblers and talking heads are beside themselves with excitement at the prospect of a new clown (arguably marginally better than the others) becoming Labour leader and so Prime Minister. What a sick country this now is.

Incidentally, Burnham is every bit as much in the Jewish-lobby pocket as all the others.

Incidentally, I saw a news report about the current Sunday Times “Rich List” (the richest UK residents). 6 out of the top ten are Jews (either individuals or families), 1 is an Indian family, 1 is of uncertain provenance (I think part-Russian, part-Jew), 1 family is of British-Irish-Canadian origin and 1 is unequivocally British (English).

The richest family has 38 BILLION pounds of assets. This is ridiculous, and would be even were they English/British.

Even were Burnham to win the Makerfield by-election, what would that signify? Only that certain parts of the North of England might still vote Labour, were Labour to have a different leader. That might well not be a gamechanger on the national level. It might mean, though, that Labour retains 100+, maybe 150, MPs next time, instead of 50.

A very large demonstration, unlike the contrived “anti-anti-semitism” gathering last week, which was organized by the malicious Jew-Zionist “Campaign Against Antisemitism” org; that was only about 500-strong, yet System “muppets” such as Kemi Badenoch and Ed Davey attended, as well as fake “free speech” poseur Toby Young..

Do not poke the Bear…

There is certainly something odd about this situation. Are we expected to believe that Josh Simons, a half-Jew, voluntarily relinquished his Commons seat in some kind of quasi-altruistic manner, thus also relinquishing his scarcely-begun political career? He was only elected in 2024 and is a mere 32 years of age.

I can only presume that Burnham has promised Simons a peerage if and when he, Burnham, is anointed as Prime Minister. A promise which may or may not ever be collected on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Simons

[“Hundreds of Chinese fishing vessels park just outside Peru’s maritime border, turn off their tracking systems, and then cross into Peruvian waters at night to engage in illegal fishing, primarily of Humboldt squid

In 2024, more than 525 Chinese vessels were registered operating near Peru’s EEZ.

Local fishermen report massive depletion of stocks and losses amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars. However, in the event of being caught, the fine can be as low as just 65 US dollars.“]

Lack of respect for the environment, including animals, is one of the worst aspects of the Chinese in the modern era.

The photo unwittingly pointing out the “controlled” nature of much of the “conservative nationalist” “movement” (“Tommy Robinson” etc).

Bravo! At least those ones understand…

Our animal friends.

Brava!

Late tweets

See also:

I note that Starmer-stein’s speech —featured there— hit several alien notes, including a brief and veiled reference to “Common Purpose“…

[“I went leafleting the UTK march with RN & PA and fully expecting a large percentage of the crowd to be hostile towards our position. It was quite the opposite. I had one hostile interaction throughout the entire day and that was some weird jewish bird. Other than that, everyone supported us.

Our position is far more popular than people expect. Even more so than what I expected.“]

Our animal friends.

Late music

[Arnold Bocklin, Triton and Nereid]

Diary Blog, 9 May 2026

Morning music

[Havana, Malecon]

Saturday quiz

Well, this week only 4/10, but thereby again beating political journalist John Rentoul, who scored 3/10. I only knew the answers to questions 1, 4, 5, and 8.

As to the other questions, I only remembered the answers to questions 2, 3, and 9 once I looked up the information, guessed wrong on question 10, and had (and still have) no idea as to questions 6 and 7.

Tweets seen

My assessment from several years ago (“Trump is a loudly-squawking parrot in a gilded cage, surrounded by a phalanx of Jews“) turns out to have been completely accurate.

Applied to a general election, would translate to a Commons with about 323 Reform UK MPs (3 short of a majority), 87 Greens (weak official Opposition), 81 LibDems, 50 Cons, 45 SNP, and 37 Lab [etc].

It now goes without saying that, on those figures, Starmer-stein would lose his own seat.

Almost no-one these days uses the word “decimate” properly, and that Schofield scribbler is no exception.

Import such populations, import their ways of doing politics and/or business and/or crime. If you want to get rid of those behaviours, you pretty much have to get rid of the populations.

At this point, Starmer the Nation-Harmer morphs from being a would-be “world leader”, and pathetic would-be bully-dictator, into a Norman Wisdom imposter-syndrome figure, the lowly [fill in his job] who is mistaken for a political leader and then makes all sorts of odd decisions.

As for Gordon Brown, a near-lunatic married to a wife who always struck me, when I saw the couple on TV at public occasions, as akin to a psychiatric nurse in charge of a patient having an outing.

Ha ha. System mouthpiece Andrew Marr once again comes out to bat for Blair-Brown Labour.

Apart from puffing Gordon Brown’s premiership, 16+ years on, Marr says as little as possible about “Harriet Harperson” and nothing at all about the real concerns of millions of British people. His list of issues mentioned did not even include mass immigration, which is tearing this country apart.

Actually, if you want to use the hackneyed “traitor” gibe, there are few better candidates:

An enemy of the British people.

Incidentally:

Regarding his political affiliations, he was formerly a Maoist and a member of the Socialist Campaign for a Labour Victory, a left-wing pressure group founded by Labour Party members, now known as the Alliance for Workers’ Liberty. His interest in Mao Zedong began as early as age eleven, when he gave fellow Craigflower School students copies of the Little Red Book that he had requested and received from the Chinese embassy.[12][13] His affinity for Maoism continued into his time at Cambridge, where Marr says he was a “raving leftie” who acquired the nickname “Red Andy“.

[Wikipedia]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Marr

A Maoist as a university student, so as late as 1978 (Mao died in 1976).

Does not say much for Marr’s political judgment.

It is one thing to be a “Maoist” aged 11, as Marr was, or thought he was —I too had two “little red books” (Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-Tung, and On People’s War by Lin Piao) given to me when I was a similar age, in my case in 1967 in Australia— but it is surely different when the person is a hopefully more mature 18-21, and in 1977 or even 1979. Incredible…

[“In normal circumstances, Keir Starmer’s appointment of Gordon Brown as his special envoy on global finance and Harriet Harman as his adviser on women and girls would be seen by Labour MPs as sensible. Tapping the wisdom of the party’s elders to solve important problems would be viewed as competent if dull technocratic government.

However these are not normal circumstances for the Prime Minister. His MPs see him as responsible for yesterday’s electoral catastrophe. He indeed has insisted he does take full responsibility.

And that is why the appointments are in fact incendiary. Because they are seen as – at best – irrelevant to the crisis faced by the government, and for many MPs and ministers they are provocative, an insult, a manifestation – in the words of one minister – “that he simply doesn’t get it.”

This is what one senior and influential member of the government told me:

“The Harriet and Gordon thing and his Guardian article [in which he said the government should neither move left or right] has annoyed Labour MPs even more. It’s tone deaf. I think people give him until Monday to actually show he gets it or he’s done.”

To be clear, this minister would often try and defend the PM. Not any more. And that’s not altogether surprising, given that few Reform voters are likely to say “I was thinking of voting for Nigel Farage but I’ve changed my mind now that Keir has tapped Gordon to create an international off-balance-sheet finance facility for defence spending.”

Another minister told me that the preference of MPs and Labour’s members would be for Starmer to stay and turn around the performance of the government, but they were increasingly doubtful he was capable of doing this.

This minister’s mood, and that of his colleagues, he said, “was increasingly of despair”.

Perhaps the biggest problem was that Starmer “is seemingly unable to give a clear coherent sense of direction for the country.”

“Voters will forgive you many of your mistakes if you can tell them where you want to take them. But he has been incapable of doing that, and none of us know whether he ever can.”

Even those members of the Cabinet who are genuine loyalists talk about him on the basis of hypothesis and guesswork. None of them seem to actually know what makes him tick or what he wants (one told me he was planning to set out his own policies more publicly in the hope that perhaps the PM would adopt them).

In that sense Starmer seems more isolated than any prime minister I’ve ever known.

A very big test for him comes on Monday, when he is expected to give a speech that will be billed as his agenda for the rest of the parliament but is in practice a plea to his MPs to give him a last chance.

I asked a minister what MPs would need to hear to be clear that he does understand their concerns, that he “gets it”.

This was the reply. “I mean god knows because I dont think he does. It’s not anything anyone else can tell him it has to come from him.”

And that, in a nutshell, is why Starmer is in so much trouble.“]

I sense, though, that the mainstream political scribblers and talking-heads still have not quite got their heads around what is happening. It is not all about Starmer-stein. Public dislike of the bastard is certainly more focussed than is dislike of the old Lab and Con parties, but what we are seeing now is rejection of the whole LibLabCon rigged political system that has been a fixed state in the UK going back certainly to 1945 and arguably to around 1900.

If you listen to the tramline minds of Andrew Marr and his type, you may think that all that Labour has to do to recover its prestige and vote is to swap one sinister clown for another, whether it be Andy Burnham, Yvette Cooper, or even Angela Rayner. No. Just no.

More tweets seen

[“Remember the absolute disaster when Gordon Brown sold off 395 tonnes of Britain’s gold at the worst possible time?

He even told the market he was doing it beforehand, which made the price tank even more. Classic.

Well, gold’s gone up about 1500% since then. That same gold would be worth around £40 billion more today.

Well, Starmer’s brought him back as his Finance Envoy.

You honestly couldn’t make this shit up!“]

[“Let’s check in on Beatrice.

Beatrice is a four-year-old Light Sussex hen in the back garden of a retired widower in a Yorkshire village. She arrived three years ago with three other hens, brought by his daughter to “give him something to look after.” It worked. He talks to them. He pretends, to himself, that he doesn’t.

Beatrice has been busy this morning.

5.42am. Beatrice exits the coop first. She is always first. The other three hens, by long arrangement, wait. The arrangement was not agreed in writing. The arrangement is, by every working measure, in force.

5.51am. Beatrice locates a slug on the lower lavender. She eats the slug. The label on a supermarket egg box would describe Beatrice as “vegetarian-fed.” Beatrice has not read the label. The slug, by 5.52am, is no longer the slug.

6.18am. Beatrice eats a worm turned up by the man’s spade in the vegetable bed. The man is digging the bed because Beatrice has, by long observation, taught him that digging the bed at 6.15am produces worms, which produces hens nearby, which produces a small social arrangement that the man has come to look forward to.

7.04am. Beatrice eats a beetle. She eats it with the considered focus of a hen who knows that beetle protein is, by every measure, the highest-quality protein available to her, and that the beetles do not, on the whole, last long once identified.

8.30am. Beatrice lays an egg. The egg weighs 64 grams. It contains, by every available analysis: a complete amino acid profile, choline, lutein, zeaxanthin, B12, vitamin D, vitamin A, selenium, iodine, and cholesterol of the kind that the human body, contrary to forty years of dietary advice, regulates by itself. The egg is, by every honest nutritional measure, one of the most complete single foods on earth. The man eats it for breakfast at 8.45am.

10.00am. Beatrice eats the man’s vegetable peelings. Carrot tops. Cabbage stalk. The end of a leek. A small piece of stale bread. This is, in industrial poultry terms, an unauthorised diet. In actual hen terms, it is the diet hens evolved on for several thousand years before anyone thought to feed them only one thing.

11.30am. Beatrice kills a rat. It is the second rat she has killed this year. She does not eat the rat (rats are too large) but she does, with great commitment, prevent it from getting near the feed. Beatrice is, by quiet local agreement, the most effective pest-control system in the village.

1.15pm. Beatrice naps in a dust bath of her own construction. The dust bath has been positioned, by Beatrice, in the precise spot in the garden that gets afternoon sun for the longest. She did not ask the man’s permission. She did not need to.

3.40pm. The man, in the kitchen, calls her name.

Beatrice comes.

She does not come for the daughter. She does not come for the postman. She comes for the man.

Things Beatrice has, in one ordinary day, debunked:

That hens are vegetarian. They are not. They are obligate omnivores, and the supermarket “vegetarian-fed” label is, by every honest reading, a deficiency diet sold at premium prices.

That eggs are bad for you. Forty years of dietary advice, substantially walked back since 2015. Eggs are now, in most modern guidelines, considered one of the most nutrient-dense foods available.

That chicken farming is, by definition, cruel. Industrial poultry, in many cases, is. Beatrice’s life is not. The honest argument targets the system, not the species.

That backyard hens spread disease. The disease vector data points overwhelmingly at intensive operations. Beatrice’s three companions and the half a million UK households who keep small flocks are not the problem.

That eggs are a luxury. The man pays approximately £15 a year per hen in feed. He gets, in return, around 280 eggs, two dead rats, a worked vegetable bed, a dust bath in the right spot, and a small quiet relationship with a creature who comes when he calls.

Beatrice is, by every honest measure, the smallest unit of working agriculture in Britain.

She is also, by quiet local consensus, the reason the man still cooks a proper breakfast.

Eat the egg.

Be the hen.

Resource the backyard.“]

Our animal friends.

“Preppers” are far better off with an acre of land and a few chickens than they are with a supply of pre-packed military-surplus MREs.

Start with Kemi Badenoch.

Slightly...”? A total loonie, as well as being, on most issues, totally wrong.

A genuine, well-funded, properly led, and ideologically-disciplined social-national party could sweep the board; and if the (((usual suspects))) were to rig the electoral system against it, it would have the people and the will to take power without elections.

Your “worse” may be our “better”…

Nick Griffin’s blog

https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/so-you-think-you-can-win-an-election

More tweets

[“Rajiv Menon KC, a highly respected silk at Garden Court Chambers and a former head of chambers, is facing proceedings for contempt of court. The alleged contempt concerns a closing speech that Rajiv delivered to a jury at the Woolwich Crown Court in January 2026. The trial involved pro-Palestine activists causing criminal damage to weapons and other property at a factory in Filton, Bristol belonging to Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest arms manufacturer.
Not only is this the first time in English legal history that a barrister is being prosecuted for contempt in respect of a closing speech at a criminal trial, but the procedure being used to prosecute Rajiv is wholly novel and without historical precedent.

Until this week, any publication about Rajiv being prosecuted for contempt has been prohibited by various court orders. As a result of reporting restrictions now being lifted, Garden Court Chambers is at last able to comment publicly on this matter. We have supported Rajiv throughout the proceedings, including significant numbers of our members attending court hearings at the Royal Courts of Justice.

Rajiv is independently represented by solicitors and leading counsel who have made powerful arguments about the jurisdictional legality and procedural propriety of the contempt proceedings being brought against Rajiv. Judgment is currently awaited from the Court of Appeal (Civil Division). It is hoped that the arguments being advanced will prevail, and that the proceedings against Rajiv will be swiftly concluded without Rajiv having to stand trial. Whatever the outcome, Garden Court Chambers will continue to support Rajiv.

It is important to note that the prosecution of Rajiv for contempt has wider constitutional implications. We are extremely concerned about the chilling effect on the Bar of the state seeking to criminalise barristers for their representation of their clients. Such action is bound to undermine the confidence of the public that those charged, particularly in political and controversial cases, can receive the committed representation that they would expect to be provided.“]

Where “they” (((they))) take over or even exercise much influence in any society, no other groups or individuals have any rights or freedoms.

Global society, not just UK society, needs to cut down the massive wealth of the few. The utter banality of the Musk and Bezos type can be seen in their competition in the field of rocketry, all so that wealthy tourists will be able to tour around the Moon or beyond. For all the incredible technical achievement, not really serious work.

As for Musk believing that Mars can be colonized, it’s just nonsense.

Late tweets

A game that the LibDems have played, and before them the Liberal Party, for many decades. Default option for those unable or unwilling to support Lab or Con (and now, Reform or Green).

It really exposes the nonsense of FPTP voting that the LibDems are now in 5th place in popular polling, behind Reform and Greens/Cons/Lab, yet are predicted to come second or third in terms of seats, merely because the LibDem vote is concentrated in about 100 out of 650 seats. Thus the LDs get 50-100 seats, despite only getting, nationwide, below 15% of the popular vote.

Look at the state of many of those areas. It is all very well to say that they would be even worse had they not had Labour monopoly control for 50-100 years, but that hardly cuts it.

[“Keir Starmer’s decision to return Gordon Brown & Harriet Harman to frontline politics shows how utterly lost he is. Why?

Because at its root the surge of Reform is a rejection of the Blairite project Brown & Harman embody.

A rejection of mass immigration.

A rejection of porous borders.

A rejection of a politics that only ever speaks for middle-class liberal progressives.

A rejection of “men can be women” woke nonsense.

A rejection of the left-leaning lawyer class Blair empowered.

A rejection of unnecessary hate laws and censorship.

A rejection of universal liberalism.

A rejection of how they view immigration sceptics as “bigots”.

And a rejection of the idea that Britishness is just “diversity”.

And Keir Starmer literally brings back the main characters!

He’s totally lost.

Doesn’t get it at all.

Roll on the next general election.“]

As I blogged nearly 2 years ago, Starmer-stein is the wrong person in the wrong job.

Advanced maskirovka. Some of those shown in the clip are brilliant.

On the one hand, blacks like that are funny, hilarious really; on the other hand, it is at the same time more than alarming that they seem to actually believe that sort of completely ahistorical nonsense.

[“If you don’t reconstruct the culture that provided for excellence, and the senior staff that demonstrate it and reinforce it, then it isn’t just the NHS that will continue to fail.
The topdown imposition of equality shifting to equity and conformity with it as a moral duty, bakes in a culture of low standards and burnout for anyone trying to fix it.
The result is failures in judgement by individuals who cannot even explain why they didn’t act appropriately. Consequences don’t register in a culture that refuses to evaluate the outcomes that matter
“]

Quite. Look at the whole “Covid” scamdemic/panicdemic, e.g. the “test and trace” nonsense run by that cretinous Dido Harding woman, and all the rest of what went on in 2020-2022.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dido_Harding

I was not yet born in 1951, but I was 4-5 years old in 1961, and in the south of England, at least, effectively all the people in the Home Counties and beyond, say 99.5%, at least, were white English/British. You never saw a black, or even an Indian, in counties such as Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire, Hampshire, West Sussex, Surrey.

Aaronovitch“…

That “you-know-who” (actually, half-Jew and half-Irish) has tweeted against me in the past, though several years ago.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Aaronovitch

Temperate rainforest. There should be a great deal more of it.

Interesting artless video from Siberia

Late music

[Baltic shore]