Afternoon music
Talking point
Tweets seen
Britain should be doing the same, and more.
The Netherlands is planning to deploy Dutch troops to Ukraine? I doubt that the Kiev regime is in need of hairdressers and coffee-makers.
Ha. Anyone who has lived in the USA knows that virtually all the “foreign policy experts”, msm commentators on foreign policy etc there, are Jews. Not all, admittedly, but the majority, probably the vast majority. That, despite the fact that Jews are only about 2% of the population of the US.
Needless to say, those Jews engaged in US foreign policy or commenting on it are Zionist Jews, in fact usually very hardline Zionists. There are a few exceptions, but not many.
That woman is a useless drone with a tickbox Ph.D., and has spent her life making a well-paid career out of “woke” nonsense.
[“Mass immigration is a threat to Britain It is a threat to our prosperity by hollowing out our economy and imposing a net fiscal cost.
It is a threat to our culture by importing inferior cultural practices from the Third World.
It is a threat to our social cohesion by delivering parallel societies with people who refuse to speak our national language and share our national identity.
It is a threat to our people by disproportionately driving sexual violence against British women and girls.
And it is a threat to available and affordable housing for the British people by exacerbating the housing crisis.
Everything I have said above is empirically accurate, backed by studies (summarised at http://mattgoodwin.org) Yet unelected, unaccountable NPCs like this “expert”, as does much of Westminster, use their position to deny it.”]
Nick Griffin: latest blog post
https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/political-judaists-target-nick-griffin
Huge defeat for the malicious Jew-Zionist “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”] cabal
A wonderful Christmas present. The malicious Jew-Zionist cabal (and fake “charity” moneymaking operation) known as the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” (“or “CAA”), has suffered a huge defeat, albeit only in the magistrates’ court (but the effects will be far-reaching).
As tweeter James Wilson implies, a barrister can only do what he can with the brief he is given, and is, also, bound (at least notionally) by the “cab rank rule”, so cannot always represent those he likes or respects.
I have no idea if, or to what extent, that particular barrister is tied up ideologically or otherwise with the Jew-Zionists and/or Israel. However, it has to be said that the “CAA” would be unlikely to instruct Counsel unless said Counsel was thought to be at least fairly supportive of them. That, at least, is my own opinion.
A court has an inherent power to stay or strike out a private criminal prosecution if it is determined to be an abuse of process. This power is exercised to ensure a fair trial and to protect the integrity of the criminal justice system.
Google AI provides a useful overview:
“Grounds for Abuse of Process
A private prosecution may be deemed an abuse of process for various reasons, including but not limited to:
- Ulterior Motive: The primary motive is not to bring a person to justice, but to achieve a collateral advantage, such as leveraging a settlement in a parallel civil claim, or pursuing a personal vendetta.
- Unfairness: Continuing the prosecution would cause such prejudice to the defendant that a fair trial would not be possible.
- Vexatious/Oppressive Action: The prosecution is frivolous, vexatious, or otherwise oppressive, meaning it is brought without proper grounds or for an improper purpose.
- Relitigation: The case attempts to relitigate matters that have already been decided by a competent court or where the defendant has already accepted a caution for the same allegations.
- Lack of Evidence/Public Interest: The case does not meet the evidential or public interest tests set out in the Code for Crown Prosecutors, which private prosecutors are expected to follow as a matter of best practice.
Mechanisms for Challenging a Private Prosecution
The defence can challenge a private prosecution in several ways:
- Court Application: The defendant can apply to the magistrates’ court or Crown Court to have the proceedings stayed as an abuse of process.
- DPP Intervention: The defence can make representations to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), inviting the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to take over the case under section 6(2) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 and subsequently discontinue it. The DPP can consider a broader range of evidence and the public interest when making this decision, which is often a more effective route than a court application to dismiss the case.
Courts generally exercise the power to permanently stop a prosecution on the grounds of abuse of process only in exceptional circumstances, as there is a strong public interest in the prosecution of crime.”
The Reginald D. Hunter private prosecution which has just been struck out relates to an attempted Jew-Zionist scam by fraudulent, dishonest, and incompetent Jewish solicitor, Mark Lewis, at the Edinburgh Fringe last year, aided and abetted by his wife/carer/accomplice Mandy Blumenthal, and now-sacked (in effect) former Daily Mail “cub reporter”, Sabrina Miller, who wrote a big report for the Daily Mail when she must have known that she was deliberately misleading the readers of that newspaper.
See:
As to Lewis himself, he is now totally washed-up. For those unaware of his background, see:
See also:
As can be seen from my blog posts, Mark Lewis and Mandy Blumenthal had, some years before the Edinburgh Fringe stunt, succeeded in extracting money from an airline via yet another fraudulent stunt, that time at Heathrow Airport. Both Blumenthal and Lewis profited thereby.
As to Sabrina Miller, she was at the centre of the campaign by Israel-supporting Jew students (with the “CAA” and other Jew-Zionist/Israeli orgs in the shadows, supporting the campaign) at Bristol University against Dr. (I think also, at the time, Professor) David Miller, who was eventually dismissed, but who won a later employment case against Bristol University. Dr. Miller is now the target of one of quite many private criminal prosecutions being undertaken by the fake “Campaign Against Antisemitism” “charity” (pressure group and part-volunteer arm of the Embassy of Israel in London), which is headed by the Jewish liar and perjurer Gideon Falter.
Incidentally, Sabrina Miller once penned a student piece saying that bestiality should be decriminalized in the UK, and she openly supported tweets by non-Jew but pro-Zionist MP, and fanatical supporter of the Jewish lobby and Israel, Ian Austin (later elevated to the degraded House of Lords by “Boris”-idiot at the behest of the Jewish lobby, despite Austin having been a Labour MP and despite Austin having been an egregious expenses cheat and freeloader). Austin’s tweets, however, “only” suggested the decriminalization of bestiality pornography, not bestiality itself. Sabrina Miller, now unemployed and/or travelling overseas, must be a very strange young woman.
Those being prosecuted by the “CAA” privately include British former MEP and one-time head of the British National Party [BNP], Nick Griffin. His representatives are expected to make an application to strike out the prosecution at Southwark Crown Court in April 2026, failing the success of which there will be a trial in May of 2026, a trial in which the alleged “criminal” act was the supposed posting on Twitter of a single cartoon. A Crown Court trial, before a High Court judge and a jury, for a single cartoon!
This country has gone mad, but the problem, at root, is that we have allowed a “certain element” to abuse us both legally and otherwise.
Anyway, the judgment in that Reginald D. Hunter case should make interesting reading for the High Court judge expected to hear the Griffin strike-out application in April…
The judiciary really must start to rein back the “lawfare” abuse being perpetrated by the Jew-Zionist fanatics in this country.
Latest: I have just heard that two more “CAA” private prosecutions have been chucked out today. Bitter herbs…
Late late tweets seen
They are indeed both hateful. Dead-eyed Zionist apologists and supremacists (but who prefer to live in Brighton rather than Tel Aviv).
Good point. I still see liar/perjurer Gideon Falter and his sidekick, “Slitherman” (Steven Silverman) given unmerited credence by BBC News and Sky News (as well as the joke “TV news outlets” such as GB News and the “does anyone watch?” Talk TV), and allowed to drone on about “antisemitism” without challenge.
Some of my own experiences of the malicious Falter and “Slitherman” “CAA” org:
and this, which features the informally-connected “UK Lawyers for Israel” or “UKLFI” (the support cadres and some office-holders of which overlap with those of the “CAA”):
Still, “what goes around comes around“, as they say…
More late tweets
As predicted on this blog, repeatedly, over 2-3 years.
Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan…
…and if the Jews and Muslims say that they will have to leave the UK if halal and kosher slaughter is banned, no problem. Win-win…
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 