Afternoon music
Tweets seen
No real English/British people voted for any immigration.
Goodwin and other Reform types will not admit that the illegal migration is only 5%-10% of the whole, and so is only one part of the problem. “Legal” migration is far bigger. Then there is the disguised migration— births to non-Europeans and to European women impregnated by non-Europeans.
Stop it all.
Sack them all.
Translates to a Commons with about 430 Reform MPs, 56 Lab, 44 LibDem, 42 SNP, 30 Greens, 13 Cons.
It has been clear for at least a year that the once-great Conservative Party is on the way out. By the time of the next general election, many of the long-term loyalist voters of the Con Party will no longer be around. They are the backbone of the Con vote.
I went into a small village shop recently, and there, holding forth to the shopkeeper and his wife, was some old lady of, I should imagine, about 90, certainly around that age. She was saying that people on “Jobseeker’s”, i.e. unemployment benefit, should be cut off after 3 months. Utterly moronic, and echoing the propaganda of the part-Jews David Cameron-Levita and George Osborne 10-15 years ago. There you have the sort of voter who might even now stick with the Con Party, or maybe move to Reform (if she lives that long).
I should not be surprised to see the Con Party vote at the next general election decline to around 10%, especially if Reform continues to hold pole position.
Yes, and one (((foreign influence))) in particular.
I bet that most of the abortions are of white English/British.
A few “squads, walls, and ends” would put the untermenschen in their place before they can be removed permanently from our society.
As if a Pakistani woman, elevated far above her abilities, is going to be interested in responding properly to that.
Britain’s toytown police state once again.
When a police woodentop came to my door about 18 months ago and in relation to alleged tweets, the first thing he said, after explaining it was about tweets reported (somehow, by an anonymous someone), was that I need not worry, because the matter had been marked “NFA— No Further Action“.
One might ask, if a matter has already been designated “No Further Action“, surely there is then no need for a uniformed constable to visit the alleged tweeter at his home in the first place? Or was that a British equivalent of the implied threats made to dissidents in the late Soviet Union, or the DDR/East Germany? i.e. “be careful what you write! We are watching”…
Imagine wasting supposedly scarce police resources on that.
I might add that in fact I was expelled from Twitter in 2018, at the instigation of a pack of Jews connected with the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”], and have, therefore, not tweeted anything at all since then. I notified the policeman of that fact, and he reluctantly accepted it; he then went away thanking me, though he did not salute me as he should have done (only —sort-of— joking…).
More tweets
More about the dishonest, negligent, incompetent, self-publicizing Jew solicitor Mark Lewis, and the (mainly if not entirely Jewish) Patron Law firm. For more about the egregious Lewis, use the search box on the blog.
Don’t expect decency or honesty from “them”, and then you will not be disappointed.
More tweets
Well worth reading.
Incidentally, the problem with such abuse of the law (“lawfare”), and the abusive law itself (Communications Act 2003, s.127) does not lie mainly with the police but with the Jew-Zionist cabals that have managed to influence, persuade, demand, wheedle, bribe, or suborn the police and the (now-thankfully-doomed) “police and crime commissioners”.
We are talking not about Jews in general but about that tiny activist, and fanatically pro-Israel, element. Out of around 250,000 or more Jews in the UK, only a few hundred, at most, are active in the said cabals (such as the “CAA”).
Some of my own experiences:
Late tweets seen
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 