Tag Archives: Garden Court Chambers

Diary Blog, 26 November 2025

Morning music

Tweets seen

[“Hi all, I’ve just reactivated social media to deliver important news. I am charged with supporting terrorism and face trial in January 2026, London after publishing ananti-Zionist legal analysis on X on the legal right to armed resistance to Israeli genocide.

The Bar Standards Board @barstandards, professional regulators of barristers, are relying on the Terrorism Act to bring this prosecution against me as a barrister, upon demands made by the UK Lawyers for Israel (@UKLFI – a notorious Zionist lobby group) despite there being no police involvement.

This is a massive expansion of the use and scope of the Terrorism Act and is part of a systematic and widespread effort by British regulators of professionals, including academics, doctors and nurses tosilence and punish professionals, by issuing substantial financial penalties and stripping professionals of their practicing license, after they speak out or take action against Israel’s genocide of Palestinians. If we don’t push back now, British regulators will be given free rein to continue prosecuting lawyers and other professionals under the draconian Terrorism Act, even without police involvement, taking the UK further into fascist territory.

On 20-21st January, my trial will be heard at the Bar Tribunal and Adjudication Service, London where my legal team will push back against this authoritarian repression of free speech within the legal profession by Zionist institutions providing cover for Israel’s atrocities against Palestinians. I have instructed barrister Franck Magennis of @gardencourtlaw to represent me in this case with the explicit instruction to defend my case in a way that does maximum damage to the racist ideology of Zionism.

We have some important updates for all who are following this case: Update 1: The Islamic Human Rights Commission have filed a request to UN Special Rapporteurs to investigate the Bar Standard Board‘s misuse of the Terrorism Act.

Update 2: The evidence in this case has now been filed. The witness statement of Ousman Noor as well as the as the expert reports of Dr. Ralph Wilde and Dr. Maung Zarni are now publicly available (link below).

Update 3: Ousman will be speaking at the Bristol Palestine Film Festival on Saturday 29th November after the screening of Censoring Palestine, on the use of Terrorism Act to penalise lawyers speaking out against Israel’s genocide of Palestinians. You can buy tickets at https://bristolpff.org.uk/2025/10/04/censoring-palestine/

You can read further details on all these updates at http://ousmannoor.com/blog.

Finally, we’re extremely grateful to all who have contributed to the crowdfunder on this case to push back against Zionist control over the British legal system and profession.

If you are able to support the defence, a link to the crowdfunder is: https://crowdjustice.com/case/stop-zionist-control-over-uk-legal-professions/ Alternatively, a prayer or well wishes for our success are warmly received 🙂 Thank you.”]

He is being “prosecuted” by the same pack of Zionist Jews that attacked me the same way in 2016. At the time, the retired circuit judge who chaired the 5-member Tribunal called my case “unprecedented”. It was the template for many of examples of Jewish “lawfare” against not only barristers, but also solicitors, doctors, pharmacists etc.

See also:

I think that I rather dislike Rod Liddle (though I have never met him personally), and I certainly do not like everything he has written (rather the contrary), but here he is obviously right, though hardly original.

I, once a long-term London resident (or should that be “inhabitant“?) wrote 3-4 years ago about a now-rare visit to the capital:

There is only one (lawful) way to get rid of “Rachel from Accounts and Customer Relations” Reeves (and the other Labour Friends of Israel enemies of the people), i.e. to vote Reform UK, despite Reform being underwhelming and ideologically unsound.

Destroy Lab and Con, both, then wait for Reform to fail to do what is necessary. Then our time will come.

The Sandbaggers

One of the most thought-provoking episodes.

More tweets seen

If juries are abolished in the UK, dissidents will be entitled to use whatever means are available to attack and destroy the enemies of the people at Westminster.

If you listen to, or read, whatever Andrew Marr thinks on any particular issue, then think or do the exact opposite, you will usually be correct.

More music

In the last days and hours of doomed Berlin in the Spring of 1945, the city was defended mainly by units of the Volkssturm (boys of 16+ too young to be called for other service, and those of greater age —official age rubric 16-64— otherwise unconscripted, and some retired men), as well as valiant remnants of the S.S., and a few foreign volunteers, including a handful of British volunteers from the very small Legion of St. George (aka Britisches Freikorps) which operated under the command of the S.S.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkssturm;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Free_Corps.

[Germany 1945— “We fight for the future of our children!“]

More tweets

An ape in a silk suit is still an ape” [Russian proverb]

See also Lammy exposing his total ignorance on Celebrity Mastermind:

In due course, perhaps Lammy will himself be subjected to summary justice…

Nick Griffin blog

Nick Griffin has now appeared in court, privately prosecuted by the malicious Jew-Zionist cabal known as “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”]. He has written a blog post about it, and particularly noting the part played by the lying bastard called Silverman (aka “Slitherman”):

https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/gaza-genocide-deniers-vs-nick-griffin

Some of my own past experiences with the same evil bastards:

As is his right, Griffin applied, via his legal representatives, for the Crown Prosecution Service [CPS] to take over the private prosecution and then discontinue the prosecution. This was denied, but it is interesting that the CPS (which had already declined to prosecute Griffin officially) did not decide to take over the prosecution and so make it an official prosecution. It therefore remains a private prosecution by a pressure group which is, effectively, a volunteer Jewish arm of the Israeli Embassy in London.

By reason of the maximum sentence upon any conviction, Nick Griffin’s case has now been sent from the magistrates’ court for trial at the Crown Court. When any trial will be is unknown. There are already Crown Court trials being set down for dates as late as (days in) 2029.

Late tweets

Only total mugs would send money to Jolyon Maugham’s “grift”-org. The man combines an enormous opinion of himself with pretty considerable ignorance, as anyone can see if they find the video of his pathetic Christmas University Challenge effort of a few years ago.

Most British people hated Rachel Reeves already…

If you are going to have child benefit (and there are good reasons to have it), then it should be limited to real English/British people.

Reform UK may be underwhelming but, electorally, seems to be the only game in town. 25%, 30%, 35%. Can it make 40%?

As for LibLabCon, 15% each (maybe), but I think that the Cons will decline to 10% by the time of the next GE, and that Labour will struggle to get to 20%.

Incidentally, such a result might leave the Cons with one solitary MP, whosoever that might be.

Ordinary “democratic” methods will not stop this.

Late music

[Tunis in winter]

Diary Blog, 22 August 2025, including news about the fanatical Jew-Zionist “Campaign Against Antisemitism” (“CAA”)

Morning music

Tweets seen

Those two fanatical Jew-Zionist organizations have largely-overlapping memberships, and work in concert.

I am unsure as to whether that tweet by one Fahad Ansari is true or not. I have been unable, at this time, to find any confirmation. Will clarify as and when.

Incidentally, the “CAA” tweet is itself mistaken, in that it describes Franck Magennis as “an officer of the court“. Magennis is, I now see (I think I was unaware of his existence until today or yesterday), a barrister: https://gardencourtchambers.co.uk/barrister/franck-magennis/.

Solicitors are, by statute, “officers of the court“; barristers are not. The distinction arises out of the historical background, going back hundreds of years, of the two main branches of the legal profession in England and Wales.

A few of my own experiences of “CAA” and “UKLFI” activity:

…and take a look at the case of Wilson v. Mendelsohn, Newbon (deceased) and Cantor (use the blog search box).

The now-washed-up self-promoting Jew-Zionist fanatic and solicitor, Mark Lewis, involved in James Wilson’s case, was and I think still is a prominent member or supporter of both the “CAA” and the “UKLFI”, at one time prominently featured on the website of the “CAA”.

Lewis is currently quite likely facing (not for the first time) both disciplinary action by the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority (SRA), and legal action by at least one former client (on grounds that may include professional negligence and civil fraud).

Simon Myerson, barrister based at Leeds, and briefly a Recorder (p/t judge), whose vituperative behaviour on social media led to his effective dismissal from the Bench after a few months, and who (I believe) may face action from the Bar Standards Board, is involved in or supportive of both UKLFI and the CAA, and was a witness (whose sworn testimony was disbelieved and/or given no weight by the trial judge) in the James Wilson defamation case. Again, for more about that, see the search box on the blog.

Having now read a little about that barrister, Magennis, it seems that he is very far from my viewpoint, ideologically, but we have both been attacked by the Jew-Zionist orgs “CAA” and “UKLFI”. Sadly, in this complex world, my enemy’s enemy is not necessarily my friend…

More tweets

https://twitter.com/wissamshabat/status/1958770361899892877

Victim of yet another Israeli war crime.

According to the “CAA” and other Jew-Zionist orgs, anything up to 96% of UK-resident Jews support Israel in anything it does.

Anyone giving support to Israel is, thereby, to some extent complicit in its crimes.

As police fly-on-wall TV show voiceovers always say, “it’s all kicking off“…

Quite likely, and the Labour Party still has about 300,000 members (though dropping rapidly), so that might add up to 75,000 or more people, which would be fairly significant; however, the 28% figure refers to members, not voters.

The Labour Party membership, especially the activists who are or were the core of that party, were always far more radical than Labour voters . A small number of people, really.

I still think that Corbyn will struggle to achieve a national vote (assuming that his new party can even fight many seats) above 5%.

Most English white people will not vote for Corbyn, who actually seems to want more migrant-invaders to arrive (and to give them even more than they currently get by way of housing, food, pocket-money, services).

It may be that some young English/Welsh/Scottish voters, as well as some ethnic minority voters, may be attracted by an anti-Israel message, as well as by a pro-Welfare State, pro-NHS etc message, and a generally pro-multikulti orientation. Some but (in my opinion) not enough to win many seats. Corbyn seems to be in George Galloway territory, more or less.

I think that Corbyn and his candidates may be able to win in a few particular seats, including that of Corbyn himself, but I doubt that the number of seats won would be more than three or four, if that.

Only a minority, a small minority, of seats look like remaining Labour anyway; maybe 150. Corbyn’s “sales pitch” would be to a fraction of that minority of seats. As said, probably far fewer than a dozen; quite likely, well under half a dozen.

In fact, it is an open question as to whether even Zara Sultana, Corbyn’s deputy, will retain her seat (at Coventry South). As a Labour candidate, she got over 47% of the vote in 2024, but next time that vote will be split between her and the new Labour candidate. Also, the Conservative vote in 2024 was nearly 24%, and the Reform UK vote over 13%. If the Con vote collapses further, Reform might get a vote, on that basis alone, of 30%+.

In 2019, the Con candidate got 42.5% of the vote, Labour (Ms. Sultana) only slightly more (43.4%). Brexit Party got 3%.

In both 2019 and 2024, the Con Party put up the same candidate, an Englishwoman, I believe. She nearly won in 2019.

Add to those factors the disaffected 2024 Lab voters deciding to cast their lot for Reform in 2028 or 2029, and one could easily see Reform getting over 40% at Coventry South, with official Labour and Ms. Sultana sharing 30%-40% between them. Exit Ms. Sultana?…

Talking point

[National Socialist poster from the 1920s: Die Bonzen im Speck, das Volk im Dreck“; literally, “the Bonzos [fat cats or bigwigs] in bacon” [i.e. in clover], the people in the dirt“].

National Socialism, Communism, and other radical movements did not, and do not, come out of nowhere.

Incidentally, note the facial features of the “Bonzos” there.

Actually, thinking about it, does that not bear at least a certain passing resemblance to the UK in 2025?

Talking point

The reality of 1930s Germany. Very different from the usual (((propaganda))) seen in the “Western” msm…

More tweets seen

In fact, here I stand somewhere in the middle. As society is now, not in 1800, or 1900, or 1960, there is a problem with —usually quite mediocre, at best— people inheriting, in some cases, tens of millions, in some cases hundreds or even thousands of millions. We all know the more newsworthy names— McCartney, Beckham, Jagger etc, but there are many others not so prominent in the gossip columns or even the financial pages. Some have wealth far beyond that bestowed upon popular music people, footballers etc, and/or their offspring.

Personally, I think it acceptable for people to inherit a modest amount, arguably up to £1M, but not £10M, certainly not £100M, £1BN or more.

This is a difficult and complex question once you get beyond simple cases. There are knotty questions of landed estates, trusts, tax avoidance offshore etc. A near-confiscatory tax regime is hard to enforce in anything approaching a free society. What I do not agree with is the out-of-hand dismissal seen in Matt Goodwin’s tweeted comment. The question or questions should be addressed.

There are, at present, only two serious contenders re. the next UK general election—Reform UK and Labour.

[“Several generations have perished”: a horrifying number of losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine revealed From a recent leak of military documents, it became known that the Armed Forces of Ukraine have lost more than 1.7 million people since the start of the full-scale conflict with Russia, writes MWM. The death rate of Ukrainian conscripts is very high, and in areas with intense combat, the life expectancy of servicemen sometimes amounts to only four hours. The Armed Forces of Ukraine suffered especially heavy losses during the invasion of the Kursk region, as they were encircled by Russian troops who attacked from several sides simultaneously. Against the backdrop of this news, more and more supporters of the regime in Kyiv are saying that Ukraine is on the verge of complete military defeat.]

Late music

[painting by Victor Ostrovsky]