There is a certain element, embedded within the UK, which is engaged is a relentless campaign to shut down what freedom of speech still exists. That element has suborned many in the mass media, politics, the law, the police, and the Crown (or “clown”) Prosecution Service. That element seeks to make economic serfs of British people.
George Orwell b. 25th June 1903 Writer “Freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” pic.twitter.com/7Xh1pchdYs
…but we do know that almost all, maybe 99%, will be long-term parasites, that a significant number will indulge in various forms of criminal activity, and that a small, but not vanishingly-small, number will be active terrorist sympathisers or operatives.
72% of them are in social housing 70% of them are unemployed 10% of them are in full time work
…and the “full-time work” in question is, in 9 cases out of 10, driving a taxi.
From a Minister who claimed £3 million on 2nd Home few yrs ago (rented her own home relatively close to Westminister for the magical figure declared £10K they all declare 10K for renting house maybe another scam,
Attempted revival of the 2010-2015 anti-disabled-people and anti-sick-people campaign waged for propaganda purposes by David Cameron-Levita and Gideon George Osborne, and implemented by Iain Dunce Duncan Smith and the Jew “lord” Freud.
Helen Whately is a disgusting woman. Born into affluent circumstances (parents both doctors, one a surgeon), she has never known poverty, ill-health, or even modest shortage of funds. She is married to a businessman of some sort, and they own several homes.
Like so many Con Party “senior” people since 2010, Helen Whately display a mixture of ignorance and overconfidence.
There is every reason to suppose that Helen Whately will lose her seat to Reform UK in or before 2029.
He began as a dreamer from Stratford… and became the voice of the human soul. Shakespeare’s life evolution in a minute — only on JamesDrake TV: pic.twitter.com/8h76xPmQxZ
Hungary will resist pressure from European Union leaders and maintain its opposition to Ukraine's accession to the EU, as well as to funding the Ukrainian military and government, Orban announced on Radio Kossuth's morning program:https://t.co/VlVlm9hkvtpic.twitter.com/Pfvd8jrEwU
Yes we don't even know that the 26 that are being sent by France to replace the 26 we sent them … are better or worse than the ones we removed. Do we even know the criteria that France are using to choose them?
The anti-Israel lobby will try and contest it. But the fact is Hamas bears sole responsibility for the horrors of the past two years. And for all its posturing, the global community recognises it. That's why Hamas is being forced to disarm and disband. And Israel isn't.
Scribblers such as Dan Hodges are, at least by some, actually taken seriously by some. Yet look at that tweet.
Hamas, says Hodges “bears sole responsibility for the horrors of the past two years“, years in which the [Israeli] Jews have killed, grievously wounded, or abducted something like a quarter of a million Gazans, mostly civilians, mostly women and children. The vast majority of buildings in Gaza are now either destroyed entirely, or damaged so badly that they are uninhabitable.
The [Israeli] Jews have cut off most medicine food etc.
Huge numbers of children have been mutilated, or had limbs amputated, by reason of Israeli bombing.
None of which has been directly done by Hamas. Indirectly, yes, Hamas attacked southern Israel in October 2023, and may have killed or captured about 1,500 Israelis and others, but it now seems that many of the Israeli dead were killed by Israeli forces, operating a pre-planned free-fire zone protocol.
Hamas should probably never have attacked Israeli territory in that way at that time, but the Israeli response has been beyond disproportionate in both time and severity. The Hamas attack was only one day, or just over a day, in duration!
Then there have been sadistic games played by Israeli Jew snipers and drone operators.
So, no, the past two years of horrors are far from being the sole responsibility of Hamas; au contraire.
As for why Hamas is being forced to disarm, and Israel is not, that is an even worse point by Hodges. Israel is not being forced to disarm simply because no party is able to force that, not even Israel’s bankroller and arms supplier, the USA.
Hodges even says:
As a ceasefire is about to come into effect, it's important to remember that every death, every injury, every bereavement, every destroyed building, every pile of rubble, every bullet fired and every bomb dropped was the fault of Hamas. They own all of this.
Would anyone at all take seriously such rubbish? I find it curious that Hodges is so totally pro-Jew, pro-Israel. He himself is not a Jew, certainly not “full-” and probably (?) not even “part-“. His craven allegiance is therefore hard to understand, unless it is just for careerist or money reasons. Pathological.
Breaking.
Migrant found guilty of threatening to kill Farage.
“Give Europeans a pile of bricks and they will leave you with a civilisation. Give Africans a civilisation and they will leave you with a pile of bricks.”
[tweeted comment seen a couple of years ago]
Simplistic, of course, but still largely true.
Talking point
Late tweets seen
I was told the story the other day of a trauma nurse who has left the NHS as the working conditions had become simply intolerable. Unsurprisingly, they are emigrating to NZ. There are so many problems inherent in the whole system now, and our governments have become too used to…
Starmer threw it in your faces to distract you from his blatant corruption for which he should have resigned. And you all took the bait. Yu are not talking about him and McSweeney doing that crooked business during Starmer’s bid for the Labour leadership.
I woke up to the germinal phase of that even in the 1970s, but since then the trade unions have become something basically fighting against the interests of their own members, as in the promotion of migration invasion, the “anti-racist” (etc) nonsense, and much else.
A group of foreign mercenaries fighting for the Ukrainian armed forces consisting of troops from the United States, Poland, and Colombia has been eliminated in the Kharkov Region, Russian security agencies told TASS:https://t.co/DlQWHqIsRHpic.twitter.com/mcj4pbn75o
Were I in their position, the first thing I would do would be to dig tunnels 5 or 10 times deeper than any found so far…
The EU approves for the first time aid to finance the salaries of Ukrainian soldiers
In a historic shift, the European Commission has approved the use of EU financial aid to fund the salaries of the Ukrainian armed forces. This decision marks the first time since the start of… pic.twitter.com/xmwbLjyhDF
…and what group or “community”, in the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, France etc, owns most of the mass media?
Yes.
“Them”…
Explosions and shooting in Kiev: attack on TE-6 underway, causing power outage. ▪️The attack continues, with power and water outages in various parts of the Ukrainian capital. DTEK confirms the power outage. ▪️150 Geranium-type strike missiles are flying over the region of… pic.twitter.com/QOYynoiGuJ
Some years ago, I realized that “nothing works properly any more” in the UK, and both tweeted (when I was still on Twitter, i.e. until 2018) and blogged about it. Others probably came to a similar realization at about the same time.
Since then, political activists, including Reform UK people such as Farage and Matt Goodwin, among many others, have taken up the refrain. In fact, it is now heard everywhere.
I encountered a “small” (but telling) example yesterday.
In the past, meaning until a year or two ago, doing some minor transaction in a bank was simple. You went in, there were several cashiers (or, in the American usage, tellers) there, you did your business and left. Easy. Now? For one thing, in the UK, you cannot simply pay a small sum in cash into someone else’s account. Oh, no, that might facilitate “money-laundering” (we are told), so you have to go through the slightly tedious process of paying the said sum into your own account, then transferring the money into the account of that other person.
Now, the banks have found other ways to make life difficult for their own customers. On entering the bank branch in question, one of only two left in the high street of my local small town, I saw the branch fairly crowded —usually, there are only one or two people there (and one cashier, where there used to be three or four).
Anyway, I paid in a modest sum to my own account via a machine. That went OK, but then I had to get the sum transferred to the destination account. That used to mean approaching someone sitting behind a desk. They would then do what was necessary in about a minute. Now? Oh, no, far too easy…
Some drone with a name-tag round his neck (one of several seen hanging about yesterday) approached me with an electronic tablet of some kind, and informed me that customers now had to “sign in” with their names… I gave him my name. He entered it on his device. He then informed me that there were 4 or 5 people ahead of me, and would I like to take a seat and wait… I had no time to waste, so gave up the idea and walked (maybe stomped) out.
What is this utter CRAP all about? The drone in question (not one of the usual staff, so obviously bussed in, with others, for this display of pointlessness) had asked me whether I do online banking. In other words, the banks want people to go online (only) and are making it awkward to do even the simplest things in person at a branch.
One small example of how everyday life in the UK has become —has been made— increasingly awkward, difficult, fraught. There are countless others, and the aim seems to be to reduce the individual to a number and a password on a screen, a kind of virtual (in either sense) serf, in short.
What I experienced yesterday was an example of deliberately “nudging” bank customers to go away and go online. The branch (in fact, all branches) can then be shut down, closed, sold off, the few remaining staff made redundant, and the quite grand building sold to become, probably, a bar or bistro.
Incidentally, opening hours have also been reduced; the branch is now open only 0930-1530.
Anyone who replies that bank opening hours were always about 6 hours a day misses the point that, as late as 1970, only 25% of British people even had a bank account (true, believe it or not).
The general dissatisfaction with UK society (and, so, politics) is not only fuelled by the black/brown migration invasion, or by other big issues being appallingly-incompetently —or deliberately-badly— handled, but by the fact that everyday life is now bedevilled by pointless, time-consuming, and utterly inflexible procedures and protocols, the aim of none of which is to help the individual, and still less to serve him.
Simply appalling. This is what the pro-Israel Jews (numbering, according to the Jewish Zionist propagandists themselves, about 95% of all Jews in the UK at least), and pro-Israel non-Jews, are supporting.
In the end, whether you call it “genocide” (which it obviously is) or not is an academic argument. The fact is that the behaviour of the Israeli Jews has been more than appalling. Inhuman. The behaviour of “the simulacrum of the human“, in fact.
Over the past 2 years, 200,000+ Gazan Arabs, mostly civilians, mostly women and children, slaughtered or grievously injured (amputations, blinding etc), as against 1,000-2,000 Jews killed or captured by Hamas operatives on one day or two days in 2023 (many of which victims were in fact killed by Israeli forces operating a scorched-earth or free-fire protocol).
That is even before you consider the pathological behaviour of the Israeli Jews, killing —and deliberately killing— or deliberately crippling, children (etc).
One group, spread across the world, and particularly the “Western” world, is the main enemy of humanity and its future. It is not the Muslim, or even Islamist, element, whatever their own flaws.
Israel is pushing Gazans to move to central and southern Gaza, the areas it claims are ‘safe.’
Yesterday, Israel has killed 83 Palestinians today — 22 in the northern Gaza Strip and 51 in the central and southern parts of the Strip. pic.twitter.com/TbJBYouXF5
The whole basis of the question is wrong. Meaning, what is the definition of “racist” anyway, and does anyone (outside the Labour Party or the msm) give a monkey’s flying ****?
Speaking of “racism”…
Every single one of Mr Lammy's historical analogies is factually incorrect. https://t.co/rxB3rAC25Q
Lammy is entirely ignorant, and as thick as two short planks.
A Russian proverb says that “an ape in a silk suit is still an ape“. [discuss].
What does it say about our society that a stupid ignorant creature such as Lammy is now “Deputy Prime Minister” and also joke “Justice Secretary” and “Lord Chancellor”, as well as being a Bencher of my old Inn of Court, Lincoln’s Inn, at which I myself am now persona non grata (by reason of having been disbarred at the instigation of a pack of conspiratorial Jews), and am without position or rank?
You decide. I already have.
More tweets seen
Also, the numbers involved are utterly trivial compared to the current numbers of real illegal migrants arriving from France. I very much doubt that the Dublin Convention, if it were still in force, would be used to return more than a handful of these interlopers.
[“Keir Starmer claims Nigel Farage is to blame for the boat people because Brexit took us out of the Dublin Convention (in 2020), which allowed us to return asylum seekers to the EU countries from whence they came. The PM is either ignorant of the facts — or knowingly lying. Neither is a good look. The Dublin Convention was a two-way street for asylum seekers. Yes, we could try to return them. But others could also be returned to us. As a result the Dublin Agreement actually made us a net recipient of asylum seekers. Take 2018. We made 5,500 requests for asylum seekers to be returned. Only 209 transfers were agreed. In the same year, under the same convention we accepted 1,215 asylum seekers. So we were net recipients by over 1,000. The Dublin Convention did nothing to make it easier to return asylum seekers. Nearly all politicians are cavalier with the truth when it suits them. But Starmer is taking this to a new level.“]
Starmer is worse than an “elected” dictator— he is an “elected” tyrant. What should be done with him? I merely pose the question.
Because people were being smuggled in on lorries. New technology and improved surveillance made that much harder so they took to boats. https://t.co/bxE5aKynIf
Those (mainly in and around the Labour Party) who talk glibly about “improved processing“, “safe and legal routes” etc (for migrant-invaders) prefer to ignore (or do not even know) that, under the present laws and structures, as many as 800 million migrant invaders might have a “legally valid” claim to asylum in the UK. 800 million!
Starmer's speech doesn't change any of the fundamentals. It's now only a matter of time before Labour MPs make their move against him > Daily Mail > https://t.co/ipRnHn7sDw
Translation— Reform 367 MPs, with a very solid Commons majority; Labour 98; LibDem 63; Cons 54; SNP 36 (etc).
What Dan Hodges means is that, on those results, about 314 Labour MPs would lose their seats (as would 97 Con Party MPs).
BREAKING: A company linked to Tory peer Baroness Michelle Mone breached a government contract of nearly £122m to supply surgical gowns during the COVID-19 pandemic, the High Court has ruled.
She was always a fake. Set up some company selling lingerie, which went bust a few years later, but by that time had networked to great effect, being “ennobled” by David Cameron-Levita before the lingerie hit the fan, so to speak. She was living largely off her House of Lords taxfree allowances and expenses, and a few TV appearances, for quite a while, but then met some very wealthy business parasite and married him.
Notice how the Jew Miliband refers to “our communities“. He is still pushing the deluded ideas about happy shiny multikulti “communities” in a happy shiny raceless cultureless Britain (in a similar Europe).
As for him telling Elon Musk to “get the hell out of ‘our country!” , the British people are shouting that, not at Elon Musk but at, among others, the migrant-invaders and the cosmopolitan parasites, including those bankrolling Starmer-stein.
✍️NEW POST✍️
Who voted for this insanity?
Who voted for the largest population increase in the UK for nearly a century?
Who voted for 98% of this population growth to be driven by mass immigration?
Who voted for 1.2 million people to migrate into the UK in one year, enough to…
[“Who voted for this insanity? Who voted for the largest population increase in the UK for nearly a century? Who voted for 98% of this population growth to be driven by mass immigration? Who voted for 1.2 million people to migrate into the UK in one year, enough to fill Birmingham? Who voted for the UK population to add 16,000 people but migration to add, net, nearly 800,000? Who voted to add a city the size of Leeds to the country in just 12 months? Who voted to add nearly 800,000 people to the UK while building only 200,000 homes?“]
Yet another poll has Reform UP after calling to scrap Indefinite Leave to Remain and put British people first
You only have to look at the recent Labour Party Conference to see how utterly isolated the present government and its unthinking, corralled supporters are. Labour is around 20% in the polls, and at least half of those intending Labour voters, maybe as high as three quarters, are actually not really British at all. Blacks and browns, so to speak.
My own assessment is that the (real) English/British people have pretty much given up on the Labour Party. That, however, is also true of the Conservative Party, surprisingly up slightly to 20% in that poll, but as low as 14% in some others.
I was talking to an elderly lady who lives in one of the most solid Conservative Party strongholds in the South of England. Apparently, all the other elderly people she knows, almost all of whom who used to vote Con (the odd LibDem too), are now determined to vote Reform when they can; all of them.
Anecdotal, yes, but a straw in the wind that seems to mirror the opinion polls of the past 9-12 months.
As I wrote yesterday. Starmer is now radioactive. Any policy he announces now generates a huge public backlash simply because it’s seen as being his policy. https://t.co/VF1JyrZ1Zg
[“So many people have argued with me online about Digital ID “What do you have to be afraid of, if you are not a criminal?” “It will be convenient and is only for interacting with government departments” Yet, here it is: on the Gov website in the UK. They have explained it in advance. This will be linked to all areas of your life. If you ignore this now, you can never go back to the life you have today. Take a stand against Digital ID.“]
I have blogged about all this, years ago. My point was that, at first at least, it will not be compulsory to hold digital ID. As with smartphones, computers, online this and that, you will not exactly be forced to comply. It is just that everyday life will become impossible without all that. Life is already difficult without smartphones, online access etc, but you can still just about do it, though only at the (literal) expense of paying more for less. In the near future, you will pretty much have to drop out of society if you do not wish to go along with the tide.
Starmer has gone further yet, in saying that he wants to make digital ID mandatory. Perhaps he has given away the game by speaking openly about this aspect of the overall conspiracy, and the System will now revert to slowly making life impossible without it, that is until a better opportunity arises to make the entire population digital serfs on pain of imprisonment or death (eg by the withholding of food or medical care —you may be unable to buy food unless you have the digital ID, you may be refused medical treatment etc).
I am pleased to sign @RupertLowe10’s letter to Keir Starmer against Digital ID.
[“This is insanity from the NHS trust in my constituency – ‘women and people who are pregnant’. No. Women get pregnant. NOT MEN. Utter nonsense. I have contacted the trust chief exec demanding for this to be removed, and an urgent clarification to be issued. Men do not get pregnant. Women get pregnant. This is not complicated. I have had enough of this woke garbage. This needs to be corrected, now.“]
That nonsense is still embedded in many public bodies, charities etc. As with so many other aspects of the dystopian conspiracy, the fake “Covid” “pandemic” (scamdemic; panicdemic) was the template for forcing an alien and inhuman culture and society onto us.
A local Great Yarmouth charity refused my salary donation today, clearly because they don’t like my approach to politics. Left-leaning people involved.
Thousands of pounds that won’t go to the people they’re supposed to help because they can’t put petty politics aside – very…
[“A local Great Yarmouth charity refused my salary donation today, clearly because they don’t like my approach to politics. Left-leaning people involved. Thousands of pounds that won’t go to the people they’re supposed to help because they can’t put petty politics aside – very disappointing. Pathetic. We should all be in this to make Great Yarmouth a better place to live and raise a family. That’s the only thing I’m interested in – it’s why I’m donating my entire MP salary to make it happen, alongside all other efforts. We will find another home for the donation… I will always put Great Yarmouth first.“]
An honest MP, not in it for the money? Remarkable. Perhaps he will be on a postage stamp one day.
[“in which the rare ‘satisfied customer’ should be stuffed and mounted on the wall”…]
First up (I trust…)— “UK Lawyers for Israel” [“UKLFI”] and the informally-connected and very malicious “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”]. Aliens (albeit with British passports, often also and at same time with Israeli ones), working away like termites on behalf of a foreign and alien state.
Can someone explain how the Government has got itself into a position where the Prime Minister is now saying he doesn’t think Nigel Farage is a racist and his Home Secretary is saying she thinks he’s worse than a racist. https://t.co/49D1TDE4yH
“Can someone explain“…how a Pakistani woman of very slight legal background (a Bar pupillage of a year, followed by a couple of years working for a firm of solicitors) was appointed as Justice Secretary and also, “Lord Chancellor” (a now-meaningless title), and is now Home Secretary? This country has become a bad joke.
Keir Starmer is now generating his own sort of political Streisand Effect. A majority of voters agree with him that Reform’s policies are racist. But as soon as he starts attacking them over it, they get a bump in the polls. https://t.co/YqbjwfmewE
Ha ha! I love the way that these phenomena are looked at either with bemusement or frustration by so many msm scribblers and talking heads. They, many of them, simply cannot understand that many, perhaps most, (real) British people are angry and disappointed with the old parties of the System, and so are ready to vote Reform.
If Reform takes power and fails, those same voters will vote social-national, many of them, if a social-national party arises. The “Overton Window” is moving, and fast, as fast as the country slides to dystopian chaos.
Reform may or may not get beyond 35% in the polls by the time of the next general election, it may even stick at about 30%, but if Lab and Con are stuck around 20%, Reform wins, handsomely. “In the country of the blind, the one-eyed man is king“, after all.
✍️ NEW POST✍️
Why Labour MPs are panicking
➡️There's no evidence Reform is sliding ➡️231 Labour MPs look set to lose to Reform ➡️Pillars of the 'realignment' are strengthening ➡️Brexit, blue-collar, Tories all trending Reform ➡️Farage is exploiting his 'golden opportunity'
Despite the fact that Israeli military intercepted several ships (preliminary data indicates three, according to the Israeli Channel 13 – six ships), the rest of the "Sumud" flotilla continues moving towards Gaza "without stopping" pic.twitter.com/AG0esNdOXA
Ukraine will not be able to use "Tomahawk" missiles against Russia
These missiles can be launched in three ways: from a destroyer ship, from Ohio, Virginia, and Los Angeles class submarines, as well as using the new land-based "Typhoon" missile system, according to "Responsible… pic.twitter.com/sCLmFZxskd
[“Ukraine will not be able to use “Tomahawk” missiles against Russia These missiles can be launched in three ways: from a destroyer ship, from Ohio, Virginia, and Los Angeles class submarines, as well as using the new land-based “Typhoon” missile system, according to “Responsible Statecraft.” It is emphasized that Ukraine has none of these capabilities and that its chances of acquiring them are practically zero. Also, as “The Wall Street Journal” notes, launching “Flamingo” missiles requires large investments for which Kyiv does not have the funds.“]
Ian Robert Millard 