Tag Archives: Liban

Diary Blog, 23 March 2026

Morning music

Talking point

[“Professor Jiang — the man nicknamed “The Professor” because he is truly one of the most dangerous geopolitical minds in the world — revealed to Tucker Carlson words you will not hear anywhere else:

Iran’s war is an American quagmire with no bottom… China is the biggest long-term loser… and the UAE will be affected in a way no one expected.

This man is not an ordinary analyst. He predicted Trump’s victory years ago — and he won. He predicted America entering a war with Iran — and it did. And today, he speaks about the future with the same confidence.

  1. Iran War = Second Ukraine
    The war will be long and exhausting. No side will admit defeat.
    America is stuck between two bad options: withdrawal = collapse of prestige… continuation = endless bleeding.
    My view: this is exactly what happened in Ukraine. Americans have no exit strategy, only an entry strategy.
  2. Why can’t America exit?
    Iran will demand $1 trillion in compensation + complete US withdrawal from the region.
    If America withdraws:

Gulf states will become clients of Iran.

Petrodollar will collapse.

America — with $39 trillion in debt — will face a real economic collapse.
The point no one talks about: America is not fighting for Iran… it is fighting so it does not collapse itself.

  1. Iran’s smart plan — $800 billion per year
    Iran plans to impose a 10% passage fee on every ship crossing the Strait of Hormuz.

    Expected revenue: $800 billion per year.
    This amount will rebuild Iran stronger than before.
    If this is correct — and I see it as not far-fetched — Iran will emerge from the war richer than it entered.
  2. The biggest loser is not America — but China
    China imports 40% of its energy from the Gulf.
    Its economy is entirely built on cheap energy.
    Even artificial intelligence — which everyone talks about — requires cheap energy.
    Any disruption in energy supplies will hit China more than any other country.
    And what no one notices: the war in Iran is not just an American war — it is a war on China’s future as a great power.
  3. The real beneficiaries? Israel and Russia
    Israel:

Wants “Greater Israel” from the Nile to the Euphrates.

Draining America in a long war = pushing it out of the region.

Weakening the Gulf = removing any competitor.
Russia:

America lifted sanctions on Russian oil (130 million barrels).

Russia sells its oil at record prices.

And finances its war in Ukraine from America’s pocket.
In short: America is paying for others’ wars while thinking it is winning.

  1. The religious factor — the hidden power no one talks about
    There are religious factions in Israel and America that genuinely believe this war is a prelude to the return of Christ.
    Blowing up Al-Aqsa Mosque and building the Third Temple is part of the plan.
    Netanyahu and Trump — according to Professor Jiang — are just tools in a project far older than them.
    This is one of the most dangerous statements in the episode, because when political decisions are driven by end-of-the-world ideology — there is no room for rationality.
  2. The ground invasion is coming — a new Vietnam
    America is considering sending 2,000 Marines to control Kharg Island (90% of Iranian oil exports).
    But Professor Jiang said clearly: “You can take it, but you cannot hold it.”
    What begins with 2,000 soldiers could end with half a million — just like in Vietnam.
  3. Weakening the UAE — the bubble is about to burst
    Dubai was built on the illusion of security.
    Simple Iranian strikes revealed the model’s fragility entirely.
    What was a “safe haven” became a target. And the confidence upon which all those towers were built is eroding.
    The UAE will not “end” — but its economic model will be severely shaken, because everything is based on the assumption of regional security — and that assumption has collapsed.
  4. Japan will recover — and China will decline
    Professor Jiang literally said: “If I had a billion dollars — I would put it all in Japan.”
    Japan has historically risen from anything: the Mongols, World War II, nuclear bombs.
    China, however: agricultural, closed, and unable to adapt to the new era.
  5. The West is collapsing from within
    Europe, Canada, and Australia are experiencing deliberate demographic change.
    The “democracy” that emerges looks more like the “organized demolition” of Western civilization.
    And the question: who is driving this? No one has a clear answer.

Conclusion
What Professor Jiang said tonight:
America is stuck in a quagmire it cannot escape.
Iran will return stronger after the war.
Israel achieves its expansionist dream.
China will be the biggest loser.
And the West destroys itself.

The remaining question:
If Professor Jiang predicted Trump’s victory and the start of the war — and he was correct…
Will his predictions today come true?
“]

Worth thinking about.

Tweets seen

See also:

Written and published on the blog 8 years ago, in 2018. I think that it still stands up pretty well.

On the face of it; though what Trump may say on day 1 may be the opposite of what he says on day 2, and both may be different than what he does on day 3 [etc].

For once, I agree with Hodges.

[“Ritter: The new US and Israel stance towards Iran could trigger a global catastrophe:

Israel and the US have now realized that regime change in Iran is not possible, the Iranian government will survive this conflict. Therefore, they are now trying to impoverish the Iranian authorities and everything they control. They aim to inflict long-term damage on Iran’s ability to produce gas, oil, and energy and to generate revenue from it. Iran has stated that it will not be the only country to go down this path. Therefore, I believe this is the beginning of one of the greatest mistakes. Conditions are being created for a global catastrophe,” emphasized military analyst and former US Marine Corps intelligence officer Scott Ritter.”]

The U.S. Congress is 99% “occupied”:

Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham etc have blood on their hands, and gold in their pockets.

The facts speak for themselves, so there is little need to use such descriptive phrases as “fifth column” or “a state within a state“.

Having said that, there are other private ambulances in the UK, which may or may not (I do not know) also offer emergency cover.

I myself have only had private healthcare (insurance) in the past when living overseas at times (former Soviet Union, Caribbean), or travel insurance, and never had to call upon it.

I have no reason to suppose that such Jewish ambulance services would ignore a non-Jew suffering in front of the operatives concerned —if for example there were a car accident right in front of the private ambulance when it had not already been booked— but most people only have the option of calling a normal NHS 999 ambulance or paramedic.

English/British (i.e. non-Jew) citizens would not even know the emergency or other numbers for these “Hatzola” ambulances.

I am guessing, admittedly, but surely only Jews, and in certain areas of London, Manchester etc, would know those emergency numbers, and thus be in a position to appeal for help in the first place.

So it would seem that they are not —100%— “apartheid“-style Jewish-only services, but probably, admittedly at a guess, 99% so. If anyone knows differently, comment appropriately, and I may publish the comment or correction on the blog.

#MoralHighGround.

Of course, none of the above justifies the destruction of the “Hatzola” ambulances, any more than it would justify, mutatis mutandis, the destruction of private ambulances belonging to, say, BUPA or other private healthcare provider.

After all, if Jews in certain areas are using their Jewish ambulances, it must mean that they are not using NHS ambulances, thus ipso facto helping the non-Jew communities by not stretching the NHS skeleton service even more.

Still, it does show what a fractured society this now is, and how some people, some communities, are more privileged than others.

Finally, I note that ÂŁ600,000-ÂŁ700,000 has already been raised by Jews in order to replace the destroyed vehicles. Imagine that level of resource being available, within a few hours at that, to ordinary English/British communities…

Well, that information is new to me.

Incidentally, and at least according to Google, “Achdus” seems to mean “day”, and “shacharis” seems to mean Jewish morning prayer services, presumably part of Israeli army routine.

[“Mossad’s plan to destabilize Iran has failed

The idea to bring the Iranian people to uprising was proposed by the head of Israeli intelligence David Barnea during the preparation stage for the military operation. Later, he presented it to Netanyahu, and in mid-January — to Trump, writes The New York Times.

According to the publication, the conviction that the US and Israel could provoke a mass uprising was a key miscalculation in the preparation for the war. Three weeks after its start, no uprising occurred in Iran.”]

Unsurprising that the plan failed. For one thing, when a country is under external attack, most citizens tend to rally round the flag; secondly, the Iranian regime seems to have killed or imprisoned tens of thousands of its most active opponents, and to have done so within the past few months. A third factor may be (again, merely guessing from what I have read) that the Iranian counter-espionage groups have rolled-up many suspected MOSSAD, Aman, and CIA networks on the ground.

That does seem strange. After all, this was an act of criminal damage. Vehicle insurance should cover that, regardless of any (supposed) Iranian “terror” aspects. The insurers might try to wriggle out but surely a normal insurance policy would cover criminal damage, which is basically what this was.

Also, the UK Government is now going to stump up monies to buy new ambulances, while the normal ambulance service for English/British people is being cut back to nothing? Certainly gives the impression of prioritization of the Jewish community over the English/British…

Anyway, I read that well over ÂŁ600,000 had already been raised by Jewish groups. Was that inaccurate? If not, why is the government wasting taxpayer money on vehicles not really available for most citizens, and when monies have already been raised anyway?

A totally incompetent and totally “occupied” Labour Friends of Israel government, headed by “Starmer-stein”.

Late tweets seen

Even some of the Jews (the more cultured and nuanced Jews) are appalled by the Jewish settler gangs in the West Bank. Murderers and terrorists.

[“I am adamant that every White Person in the world has been psyoped in one way or another over the years when jewish influence has been at its height.

It is now we put our differences aside, and come together as one to claim sovereignty of our nations once more.

I don’t believe that most people who advocate for communism want communism, just as much as I don’t believe that most people who advocate for fascism want fascism.

What we can all universally agree on is that we want freedom. Freedom is what we want, and so desperately need.

The left need to give up their open borders fairy tale and the right need to give up on their “American dream” for this to happen.

Globalism and usury need to perish.

Britain for the British, Europe for Europeans. Whites for the Anglosphere.

No more immigration. Loads of remigration. Total remigration.”]

As Jack London once said, “I am a socialist, but a white man first“. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_London.

Is he wrong? Even the migration invasion cannot be stopped, or at any rate is not being stopped.

Late music

[Ludlow Castle]

Diary Blog, 22 September 2025, including analysis of the UK government recognition of a Palestinian state

Morning music

Palestine

Ha ha. Glad to see that anti-Israeli feeling is rising, including feeling against the “facilitators” and supporters of Israel in the UK.

As regular readers of the blog will know, I oppose the recognition of Palestinian statehood for reasons other than any wish to support the Jewish state (and people know that I would never do that).

For me (and this was the settled British diplomatic convention for most of the past couple of hundred years, except during WW2), governments and states are only recognized de facto, not de jure, that is to say that recognition is, or was, only granted to governments which have, or had, effective power over the defined geographical area of a state. The ideology of the government in question, its “legitimacy”, and the “rights and wrongs”, should be, and in the past usually have been, disregarded.

In the case of Palestine, the areas of the now-“recognized” “state” are not defined, and are indistinct. Also, no Palestinian entity has effective control over either of the two main components of the rump Palestinian areas (West Bank and Gaza).

[how the land of Palestine has been seized and/or stolen by Jews over time; still continuing, of course— the maps only show the position up to 2005]

The Israeli Jews (i.e. Israeli state, which itself has been recognized by the UK for a very long time), rule over most of the existing Palestinian areas, though at a remove in the West Bank.

In fact, the UK recognised Israel de facto on January 29 1949, and de jure on 28 April 1950. In other words, the UK accepted that Israel, as a state, was something real on the ground by early 1949, even though its legitimacy as a state was not recognized by the UK until well over a year later, in 1950.

What the Starmer government of the UK (until now horribly pro-Jewish lobby and pro-Israel) has done is recognize the existence of a Palestinian state purely de jure. It cannot recognize the Palestinian state de facto because the land borders are undefined, because there is no one Palestinian entity to recognize as a government in power over the area of the recognized “state”, and because the Israeli state is ruling over, effectively, all of the West Bank and all of Gaza, despite the existence of the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank areas.

The two main wings of Palestinian politics have been split since 2006, Hamas ruling Gaza (at least until recently), Fatah ruling the West Bank: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_Authority. Neither party holds any sway to speak of in the other’s main area.

In other words, the UK government has recognized as a state a “Palestine” which has two notional ruling “governments”, which ruling entities are at loggerheads with each other, and neither of which exercises much power.

There is the other point, that the UK government is now in the position of declaring Palestine a state de jure when it has also declared (and has now put into law) the position that Hamas, the only Palestinian entity presently ruling over whatever is left standing in Gaza, is a “terrorist” entity. The UK government is therefore in the position of recognizing as a notional “state” a vague collection of areas half of which are ruled over by a “government” not only not recognized (either de facto or de jure) but also by a “government” now declared as “terrorist” by the UK government! Mad.

What this means, really, is that the UK government now officially recognizes, in effect, a non-existent (in reality) Palestinian “state”, and it also means (arguende) that the UK government is giving at least implied verbal support to Hamas, an entity which is officially “terrorist” in UK law, and support for which is a crime. Starmer and Lammy may have to arrest themselves!

More seriously, this is government and diplomacy by soundbite, and government lacking any clarity. I did say, on the blog, that Starmer was “slightly to my own surprise, clueless” several years ago. If I say so myself, I was right. Starmer is a disaster. Utterly lacking in ability to be a Prime Minister.

I suppose that Starmer and his “Man Friday”, Lammy (until recently, Foreign Secretary), might argue (well, Starmer might; Lammy is utterly incapable of stringing together a coherent sentence) that what they have recognized is not a state but a hope for a state (in the future). God knows what the likes of Bismarck or Metternich would have thought of that!

I have seen and heard nothing from the Labour Friends of Israel fraudster and expenses cheat now posing as UK Foreign Secretary (Yvette Cooper).

Actually, what Starmer has done is to pretend to recognize, as being a state, a word or name (Palestine), and only a word or name, because the recognized state does not exist: no government exists or is recognized, the areas of the recognized state are not defined, and the (long-recognized) state that does have effective power over all potential areas of Palestine, i.e. the Israeli state, neither recognizes a Palestinian state (on any boundaries) nor accepts the UK and other states’ recognition of Palestine as a state.

What makes this whole Starmer/Lammy nonsense even more nonsensical is that the UK government under “Starmer-stein” is engaged in practical support for Israel and, in effect, its brutal, sadistic and genocidal war in Gaza. He is a member, like most of his Cabinet, of Labour Friends of Israel, and not only is his wife Jewish but his children are being brought up as if full-Jew.

Starmer’s government continues to give intelligence help and support to Israel, promotes sales of arms and other equipment to Israel, pursues prosecution of anti-Israel protesters (and “antisemites” opposed to the Jewish lobby in the UK— I ought to know, after all!), and permits importation of Israeli goods and services into the UK.

The current UK government policies on the Israel/Palestine situation are simply not congruent.

Tweets seen

Good point. Labour has recently sunk as low as 16% in the opinion polls. If Starmer wants to limit the damage, he has to claw back some support from somewhere, whether from disaffected and pro-Palestinian former Labour voters or from equally-disaffected Muslims.

Frankly, I doubt whether it will work. No voter who is pro-Palestinian or anti-Israel, or (such as that lady tweeter, above, at top of today’s blog post) simply anti-genocide etc, will vote Labour because of this. Those who go the other way will likewise not vote Labour because of this, and may well vote against Labour because of it.

Neither side should be directly targeting civilians.

A social-national movement may have to build its new society on the bones and skulls of defeated enemies. That may be a regrettable necessity.

Mad. Or bad. The UK should declare global neutrality.

When it comes to Israel and the Jews, the Americans are the most pathetic “cuck” nation imaginable.

Interesting tweet-thread

I do not often repost anything tweeted by vituperative Jew-Zionist barrister Simon Myerson, but the following tweet-thread is interesting on the subject of the character of the person currently posing as Prime Minister:

Of course, for me, the effect of the notional “recognition” of a non-existent state of Palestine on the “Jewish community” is not relevant, not in the slightest, but I do oppose making Britain a diplomatic and geopolitical bad joke.

Incidentally, that side-point about Treasury Counsel is interesting. I myself was briefed, I think only two or three times, as ad hoc Treasury Counsel. I was never on any of the normal Treasury Counsel panels, sadly (“sadly” because it guarantees a supply of lucrative Government work and is also rather prestigious). I was instructed ad hoc because the work I did on those few occasions (as I say, pretty minor but involving official secrecy) required either normal Treasury Counsel or, if none was available, someone who could be briefed as having been approved to do that work. The instructing entity was the Ministry of Defence.

More tweets seen

More about the Jew Epstein, Prince Andrew, Israeli Intelligence etc

See also:

Late tweets

Pro-migration invasion System propagandists are enemies of the people.

Civil war/social war/racial war/cultural war. A mixture of those. Possibly but not necessarily slow-burn.

Andrew Marr is an evil System puppet and propagandist. See below:

Marr is a creature of evil.

Only the Aryan can give life.

[“At the end stands Victory”]

I have covered all this on the blog in recent years. Over 40% of eligible voters did not vote at GE 2024. Only about 20% of all eligible voters voted Labour. The non-voting 40+% represent the level of angry disenchantment with System politics in the UK. If any party could capture the majority of the disenchanted, that party would be one of the largest voting blocs, perhaps the very largest.

Having said that, and as far as Reform UK is concerned, even at present, on “only” 34%, the projection is that Reform will be able to form a government with a majority even larger than that of present Starmer-Labour.

Wouldn’t you like to know?!

Slava!

I disagree with Dan Hodges’ view that Farage’s latest policy announcement has been a mistake. I think it may have just won the next General Election for him and for Reform UK.

All the System drones are out on social media tonight, attacking bitterly the new Reform deportation policy. Conclusion: Reform and Farage have scored a direct hit on the System tank.

Late music