Such people are so full of their crazy “woke” ideology, hostile to white European race and culture, that they are even willing to sacrifice their own daughters to maintain their self-delusion. Would-be gravediggers of our civilization.
Rachel Reeves own words expose herself as having made political choices.
She has chosen to take the winter fuel allowance from 10 million pensioners to protect the interests of business, banks and the super rich.
Talking, tweeting or —yes— blogging about the members of the present “government of Evil” will accomplish little…
Incidentally, Starmer-Labour (which was voted for by only 4 voters out of every 12 of those voters who voted, and only 4 out of every 20 eligible voters) has no mandate to do anything much; whatever it does that is hostile to the future of the real British people must be robustly opposed.
🇬🇧 BRITAIN FIRST LAUNCHES 'PENSIONERS BEFORE MIGRANTS!' CAMPAIGN IN LONDON
Britain First has launched a new campaign entitled 'Pensioners before migrants!' in London. Our first campaign activity reached over 50,000 motorists in just a few hours. pic.twitter.com/7n21Ojte3g
A joke. Unit responsible for “smashing the gangs” has dodgy computers & is losing staff
Why don’t we take the £100 MIlLLION David Lammy is about to give to other countries in misguided hope it will stop migration & INVEST it in National Crime Agency???https://t.co/uHIYZ18yCJ
Because there are relatively few Palestinian Arabs in London, New York, Berlin etc, they have (most of them) relatively little money, and almost none of them control TV stations, radio stations, newspapers, or governments.
A one-sided picture, of course, just like the one-sided pictures the msm put out about National Socialist Germany, Mussolini’s Italy and, for that matter, the Soviet Union.
And don't forget about the stress caused to borderline eligible pensioners – many of them frail and unwell – who have the anxiety of completing a massive application form for pension credit in the hope of qualifying for WFP.
Of course, Kelvin MacKenzie, as one would expect from a former Editor of the Sun “newspaper”, has got one of the basic facts wrong: Starmer has only been Prime Minister for two months, not “three“. Which is even worse.
I cannot believe 1,700 prisoners are being released tomorrow. People will die due to Labour's jail policies – but at least Barry McButty is serving 100 years for a Facebook post.
On Tuesday 1.7k prisoners will be released, including very dangerous men.
You'd never know from Sarah Owen's thread about "hate crime" and "building resilient communities" – in her quest to be "the first BAME MP to serve as Chair" of the Women and Equalities Select Committee. https://t.co/pB0XP6fGCb
BREAKING. Germany has just announced temporary border controls at all land borders to tackle irregular migration & protect public from Islamist extremism
I wrote last week about how the elite consensus on mass migration is breaking down https://t.co/7soSqP7yKj
🇷🇺 A clip was circulating showing Russia moving one of its highly advanced Tupolev bombers from its bases, which can carry nuclear weapons. pic.twitter.com/az6gLtYwnZ
— Newspaper articles collection (@NewsArticleColl) September 9, 2024
Well, this week, 6/10, just trumping political journalist John Rentoul, who scored 5/10. I admit that no.8 was a guess on my part; I did not know the answers to questions 2, 3, 6, and 7.
Talking point
Tweets seen
You're doing this on purpose now aren't you
Pink effing lights!!!
You think that's what people want?!
God you're disgusting
Shove your stupid fairy lights you utter pathetic lily livered traitors!!!
Sort this country out and the massive amount of Islamist males and…
“You’re doing this on purpose now aren’t you Pink effing lights!!! You think that’s what people want?! God you’re disgusting.
Shove your stupid fairy lights you utter pathetic lily livered traitors!!! Sort this country out and the massive amount of Islamist males and mentally deranged men from Africa who are committing horrific crimes on a daily basis which you continue to ship in every day for us to pay for whilst you take every penny we have!
You’re a disgrace ! The people are angry !!!! Angry at what globalist liberal socialist measures have done to this once great cohesive nation. !!! Everything is breaking Our safety Our cohesion Our national identity Our public services breaking under the weight of the population explosion Our countryside you’re ripping up to house everyone Our education under woke bastardisation Our children being told not to be white not to be masculine not to be patriotic Our energy security – following the insanity of netzero and buying oil and gas from overseas when we have our own! Our food security as you fight against farmers and build on arable land and cover more land in metal solar panels
And you gaslighting us telling us we have no money and need to rob pensioners and yet in the same breath giving £11bn to foreign aid And to then stand there yesterday and say the ” far right ” Were the problem. Despicable .
I can’t think of one thing that the far right have done . My kids don’t fear the far right . Mums don’t wake at night worrying about far right grooming their girls, running around with machetes , bombing places . No We know the problem . Interpol knows the problem It’s importing a massive burden of men from 3rd world areas with often Islamist backward archaic ideologies. THATs the problem
You have let in a Trojan horse army. And you will not blame the exhausted British public who’ve put up with so much terror . You will be a leader and fix the actual problem Not the frustrated reaction after two decades of daily reports of evil committed on our streets . The public have been extremely tolerant. Beyond tolerant. No nation in the Middle East or China or Russia would have out up with one day of attacks like the U.K. has endured. And we’ve had 20+ years. The U.K. is weeping And it’s your fault.@Keir_Starmer#SackStarmer#StalinStarmer#StarmerResign“
Starmer-Labour is basically a bunch of traitors who have “marched through the institutions” (and professions) to create a pseudo-“elected” government now trying to lay down the structure of a multikulti and “woke” police state.
“Elected“? Only 4 voters, out of every 20 eligible, voted Labour.
Just got back from the protest outside Downing Street. We stood in defiance against the shocking treatment of British citizens by UK police. It’s unacceptable that they fail to act and convict real criminals. It’s time for change and accountability! #EnoughIsEnoughpic.twitter.com/MdHRVcosGD
Institutional Anti-white Racism: A leaked email, obtained by GB News, shows London's Metropolitan Police are offering officers 'of black heritage' special awards.https://t.co/1noUx5thtT
I’m Hazel. Keir Starmer would call me a far-right because I believe the safety of British little girls is paramount and that two-tier policing has got to go. #FarRightThugsUnitepic.twitter.com/XspLmEzgzX
That refers, in fact, to one Joanna Jarjue, a black woman who is (for no good reason) apparently on TV discussion-nonsense programmes occasionally. I had never heard of her, so looked her up online.
Turns out that Joanna Jarjue’s main and possibly only claim to (“15 minutes of”) “fame” was that she took part in the appalling TV show (fronted by the Jewish business person Alan Sugar) The Apprentice, seven years ago, in 2017. Sugar “fired” her before the final part of the contest: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Apprentice_(British_TV_series)_series_13#Candidates.
Seems that every pointless “discussion-nonsense” show on “British” TV now needs to show how “diverse” it is by including a black person, whether it is that useless Nigerian “grifter” Femi Oluwole or some other, such as this Gambian woman, Joanna Jarjue (of whom I had never heard until 10 minutes ago, when I saw a tweet about her defending “trans” “women” boxers brutalizing real women boxers —of whom I also disapprove— on GB News).
I do not believe that women should be boxing anyway.
I make a distinction, though, between women boxing and women doing other “martial arts” such as judo or even taekwando (which latter I myself did for a few months in 1984). There, the contenders score points, but do not (in the sport versions) aim to batter each other to the ground. I admit that taekwando utilises aggression (my instructors were always shouting at me, or encouraging me, in such terms as “More aggression, Ian! More aggression!“) but in a different way to boxing (in my opinion).
'I don't think you're concerned about a fellow woman'.
'Don't play that game'.@mrmarkdolan and Joanna Jarjue clash over the Olympic boxing row whereby a female boxer lost to an opponent who failed their gender test. pic.twitter.com/HmKC7ie34i
I looked at the GB News video clip. The Jarjue woman obviously wants to hit the “right” buttons to get invited to make more (paid) TV appearances (cf. Ash Sarkar).
Ah, here she pops up again, again on GB News:
'If I was Keir Starmer in this new Government I would be really focusing on misinformation.'
Entrepreneur and Social Commentator, Joanna Jarjue, says that social media is the root cause of recent widespread public disorder. pic.twitter.com/HTh8Z5o1Zm
Thick as two short planks. Thinks that people are angry about the state of the country not for any substantive reason, but because of “social media”. Good grief…
Seems to be supporting the fake Labour attempt to destroy whatever free speech is still left in this country. What a surprise…
More tweets seen
'This thuggery is the tip of the Iceberg.'
Former Police Sergeant, Harry Tangye, says that Keir Starmer has 'ignored' the messages of anger from the British people.
“An intelligence officer at the National Crime Agency who viewed hundreds of indecent images of children on his work computer has been jailed for 18 months.”
[Evening Standard]
We do not know, of course, what the police and the “intelligence and security” bods may be up to, whether generally or individually, or what (for instance) their political and social views might be, or whether they are doing their jobs in a biased manner.
There have been quite a few scandals involving Muslim policemen. What about Jews in such jobs or offices? Are some of them abusing their office? We do not know, at this time.
More tweets
🚨🇬🇧 The New UK Labour Government are employing 70 ‘Experienced’ Lawyers at tax payer expense to target people protesting the murder of young innocent children.
In many areas of London there are no Englishman left. Don't call it immigration because it isn't. This is an invasion that aims to erase the traditions and culture of European countries. This madness must be stopped. https://t.co/HB2ThkmXzipic.twitter.com/DpkoSo5wfN
[Manhattan in 1931, seen from North to South, with the Hudson on the right, and the East River on the left. Some tall buildings seen in the distance, Downtown, but none at all in the Midtown district(s), nor on the Upper East Side and Upper West Side to left and right of Central Park]
System scribbler Dan Hodges uses the lazy “far right” label (as meaningless as “right” or “left”).
What Hodges means is, it is OK to sit in a dark room worrying about the migration invasion, or about the connected slow collapse of our society, but not OK to do much more than wring your hands, or maybe tweet something (or blog something).
The (((usual suspects))) and their “antifascist” dupes and/or loonies have often called me “far right” (inter alia) but I have not burned down any police stations (nor even “incited” anything of the sort).
More music
[Katyusha mobile rocket-launchers in action on the Ostfront, 1940s]
More tweets
In a way it’s sad but I don’t think I can ever remember a government (new Govt) having such a short honeymoon period – it’s only four weeks and people are already getting tired of Starmer .
I was not alone in predicting a short or non-existent “honeymoon” period for Starmer-Labour. Others, though not many, echoed my view; Matt Goodwin for one (and he makes money out of his blogging…well, that’s life…).
There are many reasons for Starmer-Labour having no popularity among the British people (excepting —some— Labour Party members, and/or the grifting online professional “anti-Tory” know-nothings such as “@supertanskiii”).
First of all, Starmer and his crew have no ideas worth a plugged nickel. Look at the stupid decision to halt so many infrastructure projects recently. Infrastructure investment is the very foundation for later prosperity, though I agree for other reasons with the halt to the HS2 vanity-rail nonsense, and with the scrapping of the Stonehenge tunnel (the better idea there would be a bypass, built a mile or more away).
Rachel Reeves is someone without any ideas worth anything, and I think that Starmer is similar. As to Angela Rayner and Yvette Cooper, need the question even be put?
Secondly, money is being cut off from British people who need it, including pensioners.
Meanwhile, however, Starmer has agreed to waste THREE BILLION POUNDS A YEAR on “aid” to “Ukraine” (the Jewish regime in Kiev led by the corrupt tyrant and former sleazy comedian, Zelensky).
Starmer is also throwing money at the —actually not very useful— junior NHS doctors, who only have to endure modest pay for a few years anyway before getting to fairly high salary levels. At the same time, the planned NHS hospital building and rebuilding programme has been stopped, more or less.
That is even before you start to look at the Starmer-Labour plan to destroy what little free speech exists still in this country.
Starmer was mainly (I think) a prosecutor, certainly best known for having been Director of Public Prosecutions. Looking at him, I have always been reminded of what Chekhov said to Gorky after having met, en passant, a smug young prosecutor in pre-revolutionary Russia: “…and it is pimples on the backside of humanity, like that, who dispose of the fate of people!”…[Gorky, Literary Portraits, trs. Ivy Litvinov]: see https://archive.org/details/maxim-gorky-literary-portraits-flph-1950.
The non-existent Starmer-Labour “honeymoon” period is, of course, also a function of the unpopularity of Labour at the pseudo-“landslide” General Election, Labour having (as I repeatedly point out, but the msm rarely do) only been voted for by 4 out of every 12 people who voted (and only 4 out of every 20 if you include the 40%+ of eligible voters who did not vote at all).
A bad combination: a government voted for by, at best, 34% of the adult population (but really only by about 20%), but pretending that it is wildly popular and has a “mandate” to pass repressive laws etc.
More tweets seen
A senior government advisor has called for a Covid-style lockdown of the UK immigration protests. pic.twitter.com/uLJxp0qsA2
Here we go…sex-pest depressive “Lord Walney” (former Labour Party MP John Woodcock), a complete puppet of the Israel lobby, aka Jewish Zionist lobby (former Chair of Labour Friends of Israel), and a System drone who was ejected from the Commons by the voters, only to have been then “elevated” (in his case I cannot bring myself to write “ennobled“) to the pathetic House of Lords by a Conservative Party PM, “Boris” Johnson, himself a part-Jew and strong supporter of Israel, of course.
I can't see why Starmer would give a press conference in which he strongly condemned the Southport riots but failed to mention the violence which occurred in Leeds. Why?
Incidentally, looking at “Lord Walney” in that photo, he really has aged in the past few years. He looks drugged or something, as well.
Even leaving aside the civil rights and human rights implications of “Walney’s”/Woodcock’s suggestion, what an incredibly irresponsible and ridiculous thing to suggest, to “lock down” the UK again.
The “Covid” “lockdowns” were both dictatorial and unnecessary anyway, but the point here is the huge economic damage done by them in 2020-2021. Now Woodcock/”Walney” wants to “lock down” the country again, merely because a few cars have been overturned and a police station “up North” burnt out! I don’t recall him suggesting that when non-Brits (such as the Gypsies of Harehills, Leeds) were doing the same or worse only a week ago.
Just what the UK needs— more economic damage. What a prize careerist idiot John Woodcock/”Lord Walney” is.
Just watch that, and listen to the bastard! He’s an idiot.
More tweets
Well, a suggestion does come to my mind, but it is very boring having to explain the law etc to police who arrive at the door of my now-very-humble home (something that has happened several times in recent years by reason of malicious complaints about me made by Jew-Zionist extremists), so on this occasion I shall keep my “rebellious” ideas to myself…
I'm a far right thug too , despite having never ever been on a demo, used violence, or asked for any ..put your pictures on the thread, let's show the world how scary we are! https://t.co/GN1sNLulgi
#FarRightThugsUnite I served my country, Northern Ireland , Falklands, Cyprus, BAOR, but I'm still a far right thug! Please retweet and follow if you are in the same group. I will not let my country down! pic.twitter.com/EUOCbkJMbB
— Veteran. Proud to have served. (@Drmalrob062) August 3, 2024
By all means – I'm a 62 year old white woman – manager of a care home and yet my alter ego is a far right extremist thug according to the PM #TwoTeirKeir#EnoughIsEnough#FarRightThugsUnite
The crowds probably sense something bad coming their way.
DO NOT PARTAKE IN THE RIOTS.
This is a TRAP.
Ukraine did it in 2013 with paid agitators. Keir Starmer is trying to enact a dictatorship by using your anger and clamping down on your freedoms through these riots. pic.twitter.com/fVrE0YstBp
Maybe so. Probably so. In any case, turning over police cars etc is of little lasting effect. I think that, in the conditions of censorship that now prevail in the UK, I can say no more.
Yo Dum Dum The "Cloud" is an office building in Sacremento California https://t.co/naIW71stNU
— The White Rabbit Podcast 🐇 (@AllBiteNoBark88) August 3, 2024
Can you imagine that a substantial minority of the American electorate actually want that stupid creature to be President of the USA?
An Extinction Rebellion fanatic called Dim Crosland (not really: it was Tim Crosland) was on BBC Radio 4 Today Programme. A complete would-be dictator or neo-Stalinist zealot. I looked him up on Google, only to find that this robotic idiot was supposedly a barrister in practice at one time (if so, presumably not for long; he sounded completely inflexible), and was more recently a legal bod at the National Crime Agency, which shocked me. Is that really the kind of person that Agency employs?
I thought that this person warranted further investigation.
In fact, Crosland’s Linked In profile, while mentioning the “barrister” bit, does not note specifically that he actually has the qualification, or when he attained it—assuming that he did— but only that he has a degree in Latin and Greek literature and philosophy (“Greats”, in the traditional name) from Oxford, followed by a Master’s degree taken 8-9 years later at Utrecht University (Netherlands): https://uk.linkedin.com/in/tim-crosland-b2ab9594
[Tim Crosland]
In fact, that Linked In profile is lacking other basic details, such as where Crosland attended school at the secondary level.
Crosland acquired his main degree at Oxford, 1988-1992. His Master’s degree was granted by Utrecht University in 2001, after one year. 8 years are therefore missing.
Crosland is next heard of in 2012, where he was apparently the Chair of the “Commonwealth Cybercrime Initiative” [“CCI”]. So there are another 11 years missing.
Crosland seems to have specialized in “cybercrime”, having spent 2 years and 2 months at CCI, which in fact looks like a very limited typical international quango paper-shuffling exercise: https://www.securityskeptic.com/CCI%20Quick%20Guide.pdf
Looks like nothing much of a concrete nature was done.
Crosland’s time at CCI overlapped with his time (18 months only) at the National Crime Agency, which ended in March 2015. The two jobs together add up to only 2 years and 9 months.
Since the end of 2015, Crosland has been Director of a registered charity called Plan B, which describes itself as “...a registered charity, supporting and advancing strategic legal action to contain dangerous climate change and ocean acidification.”
Also: “Plan B. Earth (“Plan B”) combines mobilisation with strategic litigation to hold governments and others to account for their responsibilities to prevent climate breakdown. In particular Plan B aims to promote compliance with the Paris Agreement temperature limit, beyond which, according to the best available science, the risks of catastrophe are intolerable.”
Details of “Plan B” are held by the Charity Commission. It seems that Plan B, in the financial year 2018-2019, had an income of some £41,000, while expenditure was £58,000. The previous year, the figures were rather higher: income £101,000 and expenditure £72,000 (approx).
“Purposes of the charity: General charitable purposes“. “Who the charity helps: The General Public/mankind.” Unenlightening.
There is no indication anywhere, that I have seen, as to what Tim Crosland was doing in his 19 “lost years”, as mentioned here above. He seems too driven and zealous to have been lying on beaches or scuba-diving for such an amount of time. So what was he doing? Also, though talk of money may be vulgar, on what was he living?
I have been unable to find any trace of Tim Crosland’s work at the practising Bar. That does not mean that he was not practising at the Bar. Indeed, it may be that that is exactly what he was doing in those “lost” 19 years. All I am saying is that I have been so far unable to find any trace.
It may be that, as with some other Extinction Rebellion leaders (Crosland was apparently a co-founder), he has private means, a trust fund, or whatever, and so does not require a salary. Certainly a couple of years or so working as an employed lawyer is not going to have paid very much, and “Plan B” does not pay much, if anything (I should imagine that it pays nothing), as its Charity Commission details show.
I see references to Crosland here and there as “barrister” (but mostly in newspapers), also as “former government lawyer” etc, but no details of where or when he was in private practice (if he was), and no details of any reported cases (i.e. appeal cases). Certainly he is not now on the Barristers’ Register.
Britain’s new toytown police state. How long before the “caring sharing” multikulti society opens camps for dissidents? If people don’t start fighting soon, they will become complete serfs and/or prisoners of a totalitarian state of evil.
Statutory instrument published: The Prosecution of Offences (Custody Time Limits) (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Regulations 2020 – extending time people can be kept in custody before trial to 8 months.
Getting on an empty train from Oxford. The guard challenged me on the platform for not wearing a mask then followed me on the train and challenged me again in a very aggressive manner. They are like the gestapo and not following Govt guidelines. @CllrBSilvester@ClarkeMicah
The tweeter above, however, is quite mistaken to imagine that the Gestapo wasted their time like that (it was a rather small though efficient organization which mostly followed up reports from the public about potential spies and dissidents).
Yes, it was interesting @implyingalex. I don’t think she had heard any dissent for months, and so had forgotten how to handle it. https://t.co/s4G9igebvR
1/2 @marktewk My basic suggestion is that we write to our MPs in our hundreds of thousands asking them coldly what they are now being paid for, since they seem to have given up being MPs. They need to fear the loss of their seats to start holding the govt to account. https://t.co/gCQRfRIS6t
My own suggestion would be quite different and quite possibly “unlawful”…
Columnist Peter Hitchens criticises the British media's coverage of the coronavirus pandemic as "absolutely disgraceful" and "one of the greatest failures of journalism" in his life.
Quite. On a related theme, most British people despise the Extinction Rebellion idiots, but at the same time I should guess that most feel not much sympathy for the newspapers temporarily shut down; nor for their scribblers, who are mostly System drones anyway.
"The biggest mistake in the history of the world". A doctor spells out how they got covid & lockdown so horribly wrong.
Doesn't answer question of whether the 'mistake' was an accident or deliberate, but this fine piece of work explains how it happened.https://t.co/qOSuhWUGF2
It is becoming obvious to many more people than heretofore that the absurd “rules” restricting people “because of” the virus (scare) are just that— absurd. I happened to visit a small Tesco Express (in a village/suburb) today for about 5 minutes. More people were not masked than were masked.
Incompetents *do* lie. They will do almost anything to avoid discovery https://t.co/g0WaMnmveX
Are you sure of that? @ronnytodgers? In my part of the world people are written to by the NHS and invited for tests , and anyone seeking a significant medical procedure is compelled to undergo one. In Leicester test teams went from door to door. https://t.co/QnPOgAiH5U
Boris-idiot and the clowns comprising the present Cabinet are incompetent, but I myself think that that is not by any means the whole story. The “virus” scare is a global phenomenon tied in with the NWO etc.
When you see news like that below, you know that this is a mind-control and social control exercise designed to test procedures that will be repeated in more serious ways at a later date. The powers of Evil are behind this, ultimately.
Social gatherings of more than six people to be banned by law in England from Monday, amid rise in coronavirus cases https://t.co/zOnxrsA3eo
Readers may have noticed that a naive commentator in the Comments section of this blog has told me that I was “patently antisemitic” for calling Crosland a Jew (even though he is, in ethnic terms, even if he is —I am told— philosophically an atheist). My blog article cites a Jew writing in Jewish News, which Jew described Crosland as “a Jewish barrister“.
So if I call someone a Jew (who is a Jew), my words are “antisemitic”, but if a Jew (writing in Jewish News) calls that same person a Jew, then that is not “antisemitic”!
Goebbels said this on the general subject:
This is the full Today Programme interview:
I have to say, thinking of the rather “exercized” commentator in my Comments section, that his remarks seem rather lacking in logic in places. He seems to know this Crosland person, but did not give much more information of a concrete nature, beyond confirming some of my speculations.
If, as that commentator strongly implied, Crosland was doing work of a very sensitive nature in the USA or UK for many years, work so secret that not even a general idea can be put on Linked In, then why have a Linked In profile at all, if so much is, and obviously is, omitted?
Also, why is Crosland’s ordinary work as a barrister in the past not on Linked In?That cannot be “secret”, surely? Maybe he cannot be bothered to flesh out his profile. I have no idea.
I was amused by the commentator’s obvious (and so English) reverence of Oxford (University). That commentator is himself in the Oxford area.
I am actually more concerned that such a person as Crosland was involved (according to his friend/acquaintance) at a very high level with an organization such as [what is now called] the National Crime Agency! It would seem to show something rotten (again) at the heart of an important part of UK governmental administration.
According to that commentator, who holds himself out as knowing, Crosland was “cleared” for “Top Secret” information. If that clearance was justified, it raises other questions.
The idea, echoed by the commentator, that Crosland is some kind of saintly idealist, I find hard to accept. If the UK goes “carbon neutral” by 2025 or even 2035 or 2045, huge numbers of people in the UK will suffer and die as a direct result. Fact.
Extinction Rebellion has no real programme, as I noted in my blog last year about them. This is a weird and pointless cult, worshipping (as does little Greta Nut) “The Science” as a God-substitute.
Ian Robert Millard 