Morning music
Tweets seen
BBC TV News reported this morning that the Kiev regime has ordered individuals and businesses not to use fuel; it is reserved for governmental and military use until further notice. Electricity has also been restricted.
The (Russian) government in Crimea has also restricted fuel:
Looks as if the UK’s NWO/ZOG (New World Order/Zionist Occupation) Government is determined to expose the British people to the risk of thermonuclear war. Disgraceful.
If the Kiev regime starts to target Russia more deeply, more heavily, there is every chance that Kiev will be flattened, either by conventional or nuclear weapons.
Stop poking the Bear.
Basic Income will have to become normal at some point in the history of the present society.
More music
More tweets
As blogged here in the past. Now confirmed by a leading Jew fanatic-politician.
Gaza to be reduced to rubble, its inhabitants killed or maimed, then the survivors marched into the deserts and/or to Israeli-controlled concentration camps. After that, Gaza to be redeveloped and occupied by Jew settlers from Israel, USA and elsewhere (while Jewish developers make untold millions, of course).
Lebensraum for Jews, but death and destitution for their victims of their violence and large-scale theft.
More tweets
Starmer-stein’s Jewish wife and Morgan McSweeney, the latter at the very least an agent of influence for Israel and the Jewish lobby.
Labour Friends of Israel.
[“Trump has imposed on European budgets the obligation to pay 350 billion dollars for weapons transferred to Ukraine under Biden. This amount exceeds the annual defense spending of most European countries and poses a risk of undermining their financial stability. European governments are not resisting this demand. Their political course remains tied to using the Ukrainian conflict for perpetual confrontation with Russia, even when this requires consent to the further destruction of Ukrainian infrastructure and economy and the acceptance of new costs for their own societies.
Official American allocations for programs related to Ukraine amounted to about 188 billion dollars by the end of 2025, of which direct aid to Ukraine was around 127 billion. Trump applies an estimate of 350 billion dollars, which includes the cost of systems withdrawn from reserves. Europe has provided comparable amounts of support. European forces depend on American platforms and intelligence products, which limits the possibility of rapid replacement.
After the cessation of Russian gas supplies, Europe increased its purchases of American LNG. Imports from the US tripled between 2021 and 2025, reaching 75.6 billion cubic meters. This provided American producers with additional income. Germany’s industrial capacity decreased by about 15% compared to 2017. Some production facilities have moved to regions with lower energy costs amid rising prices and the loss of trade with Russia.
The military expenditures of European NATO members in 2025 increased by 14% and reached 559 billion dollars. Germany increased its spending to 114 billion dollars, or 2.3% of GDP. In 2025 alone, Europe sent 21.5 billion dollars in military aid to Ukraine. The direct damage to Ukrainian infrastructure by the end of 2025 was 195 billion dollars. The reconstruction needs for a decade amount to 588 billion dollars. The policy does not stop the depletion of the Ukrainian economy and demography.
The demand to pay 350 billion dollars confronts European capitals with the need to accept additional debt burden or enter into conflict with Washington. The American side controls key elements of the European security system. The domestic political environment reinforces the line on escalating support for Kyiv. Any retreat carries risks of internal criticism and reduces the willingness to negotiate.
Accepting the demand without resistance shows that the political commitment to weakening Russia through the Ukrainian conflict dominates over economic sustainability calculations. Europe assumes the role of a financier of the confrontation, the parameters of which are determined outside its borders. The costs are distributed across European budgets and the industrial base, while the direct losses are concentrated on Ukraine. EU policy does not contain points for adjusting the course even when critical obvious losses to its own base accumulate.”]
Interesting video
Worth considering by Western people possessing the right skills.
Incidentally, the toxic plant the woman mentions as infesting her farm is what we call “hogweed”.
Might also be of use to “preppers” etc in other countries.
[“Celebrate the end of Starmer. But be realistic about what’s coming.
A major debt crisis. Record high taxes. Deteriorating public services as we are pushed further into a population trap. Rising unemployment, especially among the young. Selling out British workers through ongoing mass immigration. Tearing up the social contract through ongoing broken borders and two-tier ideology. Continuing the managed decline of the nation.
Changing leaders will not change our political economy. If anything, shifting left will make it worse.“]
You read it here first, of course.
As to “the end of Starmer“, much as I should like to add a few words about that, the conditions of near-State repression now existent in the UK render such comment…inadvisable…
Dystopian. Some version of what I fear this country is turning into.
Talking point
The same is true, mutatis mutandis, in the UK (and the rest of Western and Central Europe, including Scandinavia).
Ian Robert Millard 