Morning music
Tweets seen
BBC TV News reported this morning that the Kiev regime has ordered individuals and businesses not to use fuel; it is reserved for governmental and military use until further notice. Electricity has also been restricted.
The (Russian) government in Crimea has also restricted fuel:
Looks as if the UK’s NWO/ZOG (New World Order/Zionist Occupation) Government is determined to expose the British people to the risk of thermonuclear war. Disgraceful.
If the Kiev regime starts to target Russia more deeply, more heavily, there is every chance that Kiev will be flattened, either by conventional or nuclear weapons. If that were to happen, more might happen.
Stop poking the Bear.
Basic Income will have to become normal at some point in the history of the present society.
More music
More tweets
As blogged here in the past. Now confirmed by a leading Jew fanatic-politician.
Gaza to be reduced to rubble, its inhabitants killed or maimed, then the survivors marched into the deserts and/or to Israeli-controlled concentration camps. After that, Gaza to be redeveloped and occupied by Jew settlers from Israel, USA and elsewhere (while Jewish developers make untold millions, of course).
Lebensraum for Jews, but death and destitution for their victims of their violence and large-scale theft.
More tweets
Starmer-stein’s Jewish wife and Morgan McSweeney, the latter at the very least an agent of influence for Israel and the Jewish lobby.
Labour Friends of Israel.
(“Lady Starmer“…haha…).
The useful tools of Zionism are dispensed with after they have outlived their usefulness. Occasionally, “with extreme prejudice”, as in the matter of Robert “Maxwell”, often now considered to have been the number one MOSSAD agent in Europe. His daughter, Ghislaine, now languishing in a Federal prison (and, I think, awaiting a Trump Presidential pardon sometime around 2028), apparently believes that MOSSAD killed her father because he “knew too much”. Maybe.
Starmer-stein, though, is probably destined, in immediate terms, not for death but for interment or internment in the House of Lords.
[“Trump has imposed on European budgets the obligation to pay 350 billion dollars for weapons transferred to Ukraine under Biden. This amount exceeds the annual defense spending of most European countries and poses a risk of undermining their financial stability. European governments are not resisting this demand. Their political course remains tied to using the Ukrainian conflict for perpetual confrontation with Russia, even when this requires consent to the further destruction of Ukrainian infrastructure and economy and the acceptance of new costs for their own societies.
Official American allocations for programs related to Ukraine amounted to about 188 billion dollars by the end of 2025, of which direct aid to Ukraine was around 127 billion. Trump applies an estimate of 350 billion dollars, which includes the cost of systems withdrawn from reserves. Europe has provided comparable amounts of support. European forces depend on American platforms and intelligence products, which limits the possibility of rapid replacement.
After the cessation of Russian gas supplies, Europe increased its purchases of American LNG. Imports from the US tripled between 2021 and 2025, reaching 75.6 billion cubic meters. This provided American producers with additional income. Germany’s industrial capacity decreased by about 15% compared to 2017. Some production facilities have moved to regions with lower energy costs amid rising prices and the loss of trade with Russia.
The military expenditures of European NATO members in 2025 increased by 14% and reached 559 billion dollars. Germany increased its spending to 114 billion dollars, or 2.3% of GDP. In 2025 alone, Europe sent 21.5 billion dollars in military aid to Ukraine. The direct damage to Ukrainian infrastructure by the end of 2025 was 195 billion dollars. The reconstruction needs for a decade amount to 588 billion dollars. The policy does not stop the depletion of the Ukrainian economy and demography.
The demand to pay 350 billion dollars confronts European capitals with the need to accept additional debt burden or enter into conflict with Washington. The American side controls key elements of the European security system. The domestic political environment reinforces the line on escalating support for Kyiv. Any retreat carries risks of internal criticism and reduces the willingness to negotiate.
Accepting the demand without resistance shows that the political commitment to weakening Russia through the Ukrainian conflict dominates over economic sustainability calculations. Europe assumes the role of a financier of the confrontation, the parameters of which are determined outside its borders. The costs are distributed across European budgets and the industrial base, while the direct losses are concentrated on Ukraine. EU policy does not contain points for adjusting the course even when critical obvious losses to its own base accumulate.”]
Interesting video
Worth considering by Western people possessing the right skills.
Incidentally, the toxic plant the woman mentions as infesting her farm is what we call “hogweed”.
Might also be of use to “preppers” etc in other countries.
[“Celebrate the end of Starmer. But be realistic about what’s coming.
A major debt crisis. Record high taxes. Deteriorating public services as we are pushed further into a population trap. Rising unemployment, especially among the young. Selling out British workers through ongoing mass immigration. Tearing up the social contract through ongoing broken borders and two-tier ideology. Continuing the managed decline of the nation.
Changing leaders will not change our political economy. If anything, shifting left will make it worse.“]
You read it here first, of course.
As to “the end of Starmer“, much as I should like to add a few words about that, the conditions of near-State repression now existent in the UK render such comment…inadvisable…
Dystopian. Some version of what I fear this country is turning into.
Talking point
The same is true, mutatis mutandis, in the UK (and the rest of Western and Central Europe, including Scandinavia).
More tweets
Quite.
Burnham won his by-election on 54.8% of a 58.8% turnout. About 32% of all eligible voters (including non-voters). The other 68% either did not vote (in many cases probably because they wanted something very radical) or voted elsewhere, mostly for Reform or Restore (all other candidates lost their deposits; the Con Party scored only 2.2%, and all others were well under 1% each).
The Guardian hailed that underwhelming result as “Andy Burnham wins huge victory“. Pathetic.
The System newspapers, TV etc are all invested in Burnham as the new Great White Hope, someone whose supposed “vision” will save the existing political system and parties…they hope.
Hard to remember now, for many, but when Starmer-stein became Prime Minister, only 2 years ago, he too was hailed as something wonderful by the msm. Some stupid woman scribbler in the Guardian even gushed about how she felt suddenly sexually attracted to him!
What a difference two years (and reality) make…
In days of yore, before Mrs. Thatcher closed off Downing Street, I occasionally used it as a short-cut. Early 1980s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downing_Street#Security_gates.
MSM drones such as Lewis Goodall naturally cannot bear anyone saying or tweeting, or blogging, the truth…
I have said for years that football, and most other sports in the UK, USA, EU states etc, now consist of what my be described as the boast that “my blacks can beat your blacks.”
Ironically, the only sport —racing— in which, at one time, in South Carolina, Georgia, Louisiana, and parts of the Caribbean, blacks were the only participants (young black boys riding bareback as jockeys) is now one of the few (certainly in the UK and mainland Europe) in which there are almost no blacks riding (and I think in the USA too, to a large extent).
The way that Flat season jockeys especially now ride, almost on the necks of the horses, was first developed by those small black boys in the Southern states of the USA in the 18thC.
…together with the fake “Conservatives” (especially under “Boris”-idiot) and the LibDem clowns.
“A massive majority” but, crucially, of Commons seats in an outdated and rigged electoral system, not in terms of popular vote.
The Starmer-Labour popular vote in 2024 was only 33.7% of all votes cast (only about 1 point up on the 2019 General Election and Corbyn-Labour), and that gave Labour over 63% of all Commons seats. Ridiculous.
In fact, fewer than 60% of eligible voters even voted. Starmer’s active voter support or citizen support was, even in 2024, no more than 20% in reality. People also voted, mainly, or most of them, to get Sunak and the Con Party out, not specifically to get Starmer-Labour in.
The Con Party vote in 2019 had been 43.63%; that fell to 23.7% st GE 2024.
In short, Starmer-Labour won GE 2024 by default, and won big by reason of the outdated/flawed/rigged electoral system.
What I mean by “rigged” is the boundaries drawn to preserve fake “fairness” and a two-tone, or at most three-sided, result.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_Kingdom_general_election#Full_results
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_United_Kingdom_general_election#Full_results
Jess Phillips really seems to think that she was re-elected despite Starmer, maybe even despite being a Labour candidate, but when you look at those who lose their main-party approval and try to get re-elected purely on their own popularity, not many do. Corbyn is the only ex-Labour one that comes to mind.
Jess Phillips: pro-Jewish lobby, pro-Israel, and one of the worst freeloaders in the Commons. God knows why anyone would want her as an MP.
See also:
As previously blogged, nothing Trump now says can be relied upon, not even for a single day.
…and that is just the conventional, non-nuclear, arsenal. Give Russia Eastern Ukraine, the Black Sea littoral, and a condominium status in Kiev, and establish a rump Ukrainian state centred on Lvov. I have been suggesting that as a suitable outcome for 4 years now.
Late thought about BBC TV News
Saw about 10 mins of the BBC TV News broadcast earlier. Some non-white woman was reading the news. I can just about tolerate “Keeev” for Kiev (well, only just— it is ludicrous), and that seems to be BBC house style at present, but the woman then referred to the Colombian capital, Bogota, as something like “Bargaaartar“.
For God’s sake, if you cannot find any educated or semi-educated (real) British people to read out your tendentious propaganda, at least get a non-white who can pronounce such a name as as Bogota without sounding utterly stupid.
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 