Diary Blog, 7 January 2025

Morning music

[please note that, once again, and for some unexplained technical reason, tweets are not embedding properly. Click on the relevant link to read the tweet]

Talking point

Tweets seen

…the highest levels of government“? I suppose that System scribbler Nicholas Watt [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicholas_Watt] means would-be dictator Starmer and his cronies, pathetic jokers such as Rachel Reeves and Yvette Cooper, and maybe thick-as-two-short-planks Angela Rayner, not forgetting equally-thick “diversity hire” idiot, David Lammy.

What I look upon with “horror” is, inter alia, the fact that only someone such as Elon Musk, someone outside the jurisdiction of the poundland police state that Britain has become and/or is becoming, can speak out on a number of very important issues, such as —only one example— the Pakistani-origin “community” conspiracies to rape young English girls.

Our animal friends

I like most animals but especially cats and donkeys.

More tweets seen

I have never agreed with everything Katie Hopkins has said, but she does make me laugh.

I once met the Metropolitan of Kiev (the second-ranked Orthodox dignitary after the Patriarch of Moscow). About 40 or 42 years ago, when he visited London. He gave me a bottle of Moskovskaya vodka. A rather clever/cunning man, but quite benign, I thought. Small, with a huge —and especially long— beard that he tucked into his overcoat, like a scarf.

Hero.

More music

[Bishop Rock lighthouse, Isles of Scilly, in a winter storm. I went there once, but the sea was as calm as a millpond on that occasion]

More tweets seen

Zoe Gardner (“@zoejardiniere” on Twitter/X) has been one of the most fanatical pro-immigration drones for years, not only online but also on TV.

Here’s the arrest rate for different nationalities in the UK once you weight for their population:

Brits = 12 arrests per 1,000 people

Somalis 64.6 per 1,000 people

Moroccans 70 per 1,000 people

Algerians 72.7 per 1,000 people

Iraqis 92.9 per 1,000 people

Afghans 106.9 per 1,000 people

Albanians 209.8 per 1,000 people.

System scribblers and talking heads agreeing that Farage has always been “controlled opposition”.

Still, the “Overton window” continues to move, and the political milieu in Britain, outside the Westminster monkeyhouse, is on the move.

London. Zoo.

https://www.mylondon.news/news/transport/man-slashes-seats-knife-broad-30721446?int_source=nba

A search has been launched after a man slashed multiple train seats with a knife in broad daylight. The incident took place at around 3pm on Monday, September 23 on a train between Erith and London Bridge.

British Transport Police have since been investigating a man in possession of an offensive weapon and the serious public order offence.

[My London]

Take a look at that photo. Is there any point keeping such a “person” in our society? Useless even as forced labour.

We have to accept that we need to upgrade the population in order to evolve the society, or even maintain it as it is. Much of the London population, indeed the UK population, now degrades society just by existing.

More tweets seen

Which is why Ukrainians now have to be abducted by press-gangs looking for “recruits”. No-one with half a brain wants to serve in the Kiev-regime forces— it’s a death sentence.

Trump, USA, NATO, EU, Denmark, Greenland, UK, and Russia

This Greenland thing (the USA potentially going to annex the territory) may (if it ever happens) drive a wedge between the USA on the one hand, and the EU states (and European members of NATO) on the other. That would be a very good thing. NATO might even fall apart, enabling all of Europe to develop closer links with Russia.

Late music

10 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 7 January 2025”

  1. “only someone such as Elon Musk, someone outside the jurisdiction of the poundland police state that Britain has become and/or is becoming, can speak out on a number of very important issues, such as —only one example— the Pakistani-origin “community” conspiracies to rape young English girls.”

    This is a very important point, and it is one of the main reasons that it is so important for Pro-White Americans to support the Pro-White movements and Pro-White activists in European countries such as Britain, Germany, etc.

    It is always important for those with a voice to speak up to defend those who cannot speak for themselves, and this is especially important when the voiceless are our own White racial kin.

    That is why it is absolutely vital for Americans (who still have freedom of speech at least for now) to speak up and defend and support the Pro-White cause in countries where no freedom of speech exists.

    Undoubtedly, our own traitor politicians would have enthusiastically enacted “hate speech” bans at the behest of their (((evil masters))), but so far the First Amendment has largely prevented them from criminalizing Pro-White speech.

    (((They))) are working 24/7 to find a way to nullify the First Amendment, but so far have been mostly unable to do so, except on university campuses.

    Already (((they))) are nibbling at the edges of the First Amendment, for example by passing laws that ban state employees and companies with state contracts from boycotting israel.

    In one case, a city in Texas even required hurricane victims applying for government assistance to certify that they are not boycotting israel, as a condition of receiving hurricane aid.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41688999

    The requirement was eventually dropped after a widespread outcry.

    But most of the boycott bans for state employees and state contractors are still in force.

    As shown in the map below, the vast majority of US states have passed laws banning companies with government contracts from boycotting israel.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-BDS_laws#Anti-BDS_laws_in_the_United_States

    In 2017, the government of Kansas attempted to terminate the employment of a trainee teacher who was personally boycotting israel. The trainee teacher sued the Kansas government, which passed a law specifically exempting her (but nobody else) from the law. Thus, the trainee teacher no longer had standing to sue. This move by the state of Kansas prevented the law from being ruled unconstitutional in court.

    The (((purpose))) of these laws is obviously to have a “chilling effect” on free speech.

    The (((malevolent tribe))) is constantly looking for ways to intimidate everyone into supporting (((them))) and (((their))) zionist state in the Middle East.

    Since Americans still have free speech (at least so far), it is our duty to vocally support and speak up for Pro-White movements in countries such as Britain which do not have free speech.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Some further thoughts on the free speech issue:

    The fact that the British people don’t have free speech makes the silence of the British political elite even MORE treasonous.

    What I mean is: the politicians in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords have “parliamentary privilege” to say anything they want in parliament. They cannot be prosecuted for “hate speech” for anything they say under parliamentary privilege.

    Parliamentary privilege is basically an exemption or free pass which allows MPs and lords to circumvent the “hate speech” laws.

    But how many MPs or lords have used their parliamentary privilege to speak up for the little White girls who are raped by muslims/africans? How many MPs or lords have used their parliamentary privilege to warn the public about how the government is intentionally importing millions of violent immigrants to demographically replace the indigenous White British? How many MPs or lords have used their parliamentary privilege to oppose White genocide? How many MPs or lords have used their parliamentary privilege to warn the public about the huge amount of crime (especially sex offenses) committed by diversity? How many MPs or lords have used their parliamentary privilege to warn the public about how the (((REDACTEDS))) are destroying the indigenous White British people?

    The number of MPs and lords who have used their parliamentary privilege to say anything even remotely Pro-White is close to zero.

    Out of all the MPs and lords who have served in parliament in the past 25 years, the only ones I can think of are:

    -Lord Malcolm Pearson of Rannoch (formerly UKIP, now independent) made a couple of comments denouncing the muslim rape gangs.

    -Lee Anderson (Tory, now Reform) has, if I remember correctly, spoken up to denounce the muslim rape gangs.

    -Sarah Champion (Labor) stated that pakistani men are raping White girls, and she complained that people are too afraid of being called “racist” to speak up about child abuse. However, she distanced herself from some of these statements afterward, and also resigned from her shadow front bench position.

    So that’s a grand total of THREE politicians (out of thousands) who have used their parliamentary privilege in the past 25 years to speak up for voiceless White people.

    There might be a couple of others who I forgot, but if so, they aren’t many.

    The fact that the politicians have an exemption from the “hate speech” laws, but are too cowardly and traitorous to use that exemption to speak up for White people, makes the politicians’ treason even WORSE.

    The same applies to influential and powerful British celebrities, billionaires, royalty, etc. Although they don’t have parliamentary privilege, it is unlikely that they would be prosecuted due to their elite status.

    Even so, virtually ALL of these elites are too cowardly, self-centered, and traitorous to speak up and defend the White race.

    These elites are the people who could really make a difference by speaking up, yet they cowardly choose to remain silent. Disgraceful.

    The cowardice, greed and treason of the existing societal elite makes it all the more important to create a new fanatically Pro-White societal elite, after the Pro-White movement wins power.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I despise Tim Montgomerie. Back in the 2000s, when the BNP were desperately trying to wake people up and warn the public about the muslim rape gangs, Tim Montgomerie viciously attacked the BNP and tried to smear the BNP as “far left Nazis” and “un-British.”

    Montgomerie was also a co-founder of Iain Duncan Smith’s evil “Center for Social Justice”, which promotes harsh and inhumane Thatcherite austerity policies that harm the White working class.

    What a scumbag Montgomerie is. I am rather surprised that the Traitor Tory Party never offered him a safe seat in the Commons (or at least a peerage) as a reward for his obedient toadying.

    Now he’s jumped ship and joined Reform. Perhaps the Tories have moved so far to the left that even Montgomerie became disgruntled? Or maybe he is jumping on the Reform bandwagon in the hope that they will offer him a winnable seat in 2029?

    I will continue to view Montgomerie as a traitor unless he apologizes for attacking the BNP and thus aiding the (((establishment))) in covering up the muslim rape gangs.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Friend of Britain:
      Yes, Montgomerie was one of those fake Cameron-Levita “compassionate Conservatives” of the pre-2015 era.

      I am interested in the fact that he has apparently never been nominated for either knighthood or peerage, which I attribute, though speculatively, to his private life (though I admit that I have no information about that). I cannot see any other reason why he was never “honoured”, looking at the rabble who *have* been so “honoured”.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Montgomerie

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I have never heard of Tim Montgomerie, but considering he was a supporter of Cameron and a friend Ian Duncan-Smith is enough to consign him to the rubbish bin (LOL)

        If you think about it, the expression “compassionate conservatism” is a perfect oxymoron, particularly coming from people like Cameron & Montgomerie.

        Like

  4. Compassionate conservatism is not inherently an oxymoron. The Conservative Party was quite capable of espousing it from the 1930’s when Chamberlain (one of the most fundamentally humane and decent PMs we have ever had) and Baldwin engaged in some tentative social reforms until Thatcher and even she was not a total monster in this respect.

    Then the globalist neo-liberal philosophy took a stronger hold with John Major until we get to the obscenity of immoral ‘posh boys’ Cameron and George Gideon Oliver Osbourne with their intentionally divisive and disgraceful conference speeches which even Thatcher would have castigated them for and common little ‘oik’, supremely thick and bigoted and wildly over promoted Iain Dumbo-Smith.

    Like

Leave a comment