Diary Blog, 26 April 2025

Morning music

Saturday quiz

Well, 6/10 this week, trumping the 2/10 scored by political journalist John Rentoul. I did not know the answers to questions 2, 3, 5, and 8.

The Jewish-Zionist plot to bring down Corbyn

The website Declassified UK has published a review of a book on the anti-Corbyn campaign, headlined “Morgan McSweeney’s ‘plot without precedent in Labour history’— A new book chronicles how Labour strategist Morgan McSweeney used ‘any means necessary’ to destroy Corbyn as leader and install Starmer.”

As one would expect, the book and the review both term the anti-Corbyn plotters “the Right“, rather than “Jews” or “Jew-Zionists”; and they use the now so-outdated “Right/Left” descriptors.

In fact, the plot to topple Corbyn was plainly one planned and funded by pro-Israeli, and probably actual Israeli, sources at root, though carried out by Zionists or pro-Zionists not all of which were Jews (though many were).

I followed Corbyn’s progress on the blog almost from when the blog started in late 2016; certainly from 2017. It was clear to me that there was a basically Jewish —and almost certainly also Israeli— conspiracy to topple him.

Not that I much favoured Corbyn, a relatively uneducated man with simplistic socialist policy viewpoints. Also, while being anti-Israeli, Corbyn always gave lip-service to some of the Zionist propaganda regulars, such as the WW2 “holocaust” narrative. He was not ruthless enough to crush his enemies.

Still, Corbyn was at least a recognizable and relatively decent English type. Starmer (“Starmer-stein”) has no decency and is just a careerist drone, out for what he can get, as witness his grabbing whatever freebies, expenses-paid items, holiday trips etc he and his Jewish wife can grab. Also, of course, his directionless travel on policy.

The fake-Labour “welfare” cuts, the cheating of the pensioners, unemployed, sick, disabled etc. The U-turn on the “trans” nonsense, too. On the one hand on his knees (literally, with Angela Rayner) before the black mobs of “Black Lives Matter”, but then playing the poundshop Stalin when English people got angry at the migration-invasion.

The website post is worth reading, but cannot be linked to, it seems.

See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgan_McSweeney.

Tweets seen

I wonder. I am minded to think that, even if a temporary peace is agreed soon, it will not last. Russia must take and retain all of the territory east of the Dnieper.

Balashikha is, inter alia, a kind of colony for high-ranking Russian military people, situated east of Moscow, and a kind of outer suburb.

The Kiev regime seems to be able to hit individuals in Russia quite efficiently. It is an open question whether the Kiev-regime secret services have, or have had, the help of the CIA and/or MOSSAD to do that. Not the CIA any more, I should have thought.

Of course, such assassinations, while high-profile, do not change the fact that, on the ground in Ukraine, Russian forces continue to advance steadily on all relevant sectors of the front.

As I predicted long ago on the blog. I said that Starmer-stein would try to “solve” the “small boats” migration-invasion by “processing” claims (rubberstamping them) swiftly, possibly overseas, thus magically turning illegal immigrants into legal ones, then emptying the asylum hotels by gifting the invaders council housing or State-paid private rental housing that should be going to British people.

I hope that the voters of Runcorn and Helsby send a firm message —by voting Reform— to Starmer-stein at the by-election next Thursday.

Runcorn and Helsby, this is your chance to make history.

On those figures, Reform would have well over 250 MPs, Labour fewer than 190, and the Cons only 75. The Cons might then be the third-largest party in the Commons, but possibly only the fourth-largest. Terminal.

That evil spirit, Ursula von der Leyen, talks about peace, while supplying the brutal and corrupt Kiev regime dictatorship with huge amounts of arms, ammunition, and EU taxpayers’ money.

Wherever two or more are gathered in my name...” (but are they?).

Runcorn and Helsby voters!— do what you have to do next Thursday to sink Labour. If you vote Reform, well and good. If you want to vote Green or elsewhere, OK. Whatever you do, don’t vote Starmer-stein fake Labour, even if it means just staying home.

So that’s the end of that…

Glad I am not in his boots (whether guilty or not).

They count the rockets being intercepted; seem to have numbered twelve.

Late music

[Rio by night, as seen from Corcovado]

10 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 26 April 2025”

    1. Well, who could have forseen that?🙄🙄🙄🙄 Shock, horror, importing the Third World has led to Third World crimes such as the ‘enriching’ delights of gang rapes and is also causing conflicts from places like India and Pakistan to be imported into our towns and cities.

      What real benefits for we Britons does constant Third World immigration bring? Feeling smug and self-satisfied at Islington dinner parties does not count!🙄🙄🙄🙄

      Like

  1. Although Corbyn was another System´s drone, he was not trusted by the Establishment that decided to replace him with the ultra-pliable Starmer. Starmerstein´s Labour is Blair´s “New Labour” on steroids, to use the popular cliché. As you said, Reform is far from being the solution, but it is a step in the right direction.

    Incidentally, the pathetic “coalition of the willing” (willing to do whatever (((the usual suspects))) tell them to do) has crumbled, as it was to be expected.

    https://www.rt.com/news/616330-uk-scraps-ukraine-troop-deployment/

    Like

    1. Claudius:
      The whole world order established in and after 1945 stands on the brink. That world order was based on the alliance of the USA with others,particularly the (other four of the) Anglo-Saxon “five eyes” (UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand), and with Western Europe under American protection but also direction to a large extent.

      The monolithic socialist bloc was quite immobile, as was the international situation.

      After 1989, socialism fell, generally. The whole international matrix began to shift. Now we see that the USA is moving toward isolationism, but at the same time is facing for the first time a near-superpower challenging the USA both militarily and economically—China.

      As far as Europe is concerned, the EU is close to breaking apart by reason of internal stresses. EU relations with the USA are very strained, and more so with Russia.

      The UK is still acting as “America’s poodle”, as witness Starmer’s weakness vis a vis Trump, yet the UK is tied up with the EU states diplomatically, and that sets the UK against Russia.

      Re. China, both the UK and EU have little power, and still want cheap Chinese goods.

      When you add in the migration invasion of the UK and other states, you can see that the UK and much of the EU is likely to become even more volatile politically.

      In Ukraine, Russian forces continue to advance daily. Zelensky’s Kursk diversion has failed, as it was bound to do. Whether Putin has outplayed Trump or not, there is nothing that the USA can do to prevent Russian victory (short of nuclear war), because the Kiev regime is running out of troops far faster than Russia.

      Liked by 1 person

    1. Claudius:
      A lady I once knew, now deceased, said to me 40 years ago that the French still deal with the Soviet Union (1980s) (and now also Russia in the 2020s) as if we were still in the time of Metternich (actually one of her ancestors on the maternal side). In other words, the French are rather wont to over-value their influence on international affairs. True of the UK too, of course.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I agree with your observation. Nearly 10 years ago, I was having dinner at the house of a friend of mine, and I met a Catholic priest who had just come from France, where he spent three years. We were talking about the French in general, and when I mentioned how arrogant some of them are, he smiled and told me: “There are many who think that France is still a superpower as it used to be under Louis XIV and Napoleon”.

        Like

    1. Claudius:
      Thank you.

      As Shakespeare said of men and women, empires too “have their entrances and their exits“, though I think that both the American “empire” and the Russian one (using the word “empire” in a broader sense than usual) have not come to their final exits.

      Like

Leave a reply to John Cancel reply