Afternoon music
Tweets seen
[“It’s not just the liberal ones. Left = Bolshevism (Marxism) Right = Zionism (Conservatism) With the uniparty in our government for decades, they win either way. They have pitted left against right to distract us from what’s going on. It’s time to put all our differences aside and stand united to protect our ancestral lands. No more brother wars.“]
[“Amid rock-bottom 12% approval for Labour (YouGov), calls are growing for King Charles to dissolve Parliament & force an election. Legally? ONLY the King holds this revived prerogative power (2022 Act). By convention, on the PMs advice, but reserve powers exist as a vital safeguard against a truly rogue government losing all public trust. Convention binds… until a crisis demands the Crown acts for the people. The question isn’t ‘can he?’—it’s ‘should he, when democracy hangs by a thread?’ #DissolveParliament #KingCharles #ReservePowers #LabourInCrisis“]
As if Charles would rock the System boat in that way! Still, interesting idea.
What we have at present is a notionally “elected” dictatorship, and one of absolute clowns, as well as agents of Israel. Fake “Labour” was elected by default, because the equally fake “Conservative” misgovernment had to be binned in 2024; voting Labour was the only realistic way to do that. However, as pointed out on this blog since the 2024 General Election, Labour was the choice of only 4 people out of every 12 that voted, and only 4 out of every 20 eligible voters. It never had a genuine democratic mandate.
Now we see Starmer-stein’s dictatorship threatening to abolish the jury trial system, and actually cancelling elections. The British people have the right to rise up, in these circumstances.
See also:
As said on the blog many times over the years, and on my Twitter account too until 2018 (in which year a conspiratorial pack of Jews had me expelled).
Mass immigration impacts all of the other issues.
[“Why do we accept biological reality when it comes to sex and age, yet suddenly abandon it when ancestry enters the conversation? Scientists could examine my remains after death and determine that I was male, estimate my age, identify my ancestry as European, and even trace genetic continuity with populations that have lived in Britain for centuries. Yet, when ancestry intersects with modern identity politics, we’re told biology no longer applies. Instead, whether someone is considered English, Scottish, Welsh, or Irish is reduced to a citizenship test, a checklist of historical trivia on kings and queens, and a piece of paper, as if that overrides biological and ancestral reality.“]
#SS-Ahnenerbe
More music
More tweets
Dugin occasionally makes good points, but at least as often, in fact more often, displays ideological and historical confusion, something far from unknown in Slavonic philosophers and ruminants.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Dugin
A very impressive display, as always.
Though a picturesque survival, foxhunting has outlived its time, and its cruelty and, indeed, sadism, cannot be tolerated any longer.
The hunts, or many/most of them, are flouting the existing law, which allows them to trail-hunt but not to fox-hunt. They must therefore be closed down.
As for the foxhunters themselves, I have never met a decent one.
Looks as though the Eurostar should take a leaf from the book of the Red Arrow rail service in Russia (Petersburg-Moscow):
As the UK slides in terms of living standards, standards of (real) education, standards of behaviour etc, as it becomes even more a multiracial, multicultural mess, more and more highly-qualified British people will try to get to wherever they feel some semblance of an advanced society still exists. Thus the decline of UK society will get even worse.
Late tweets
“Tis the season to be jolly“, it seems…
At least some of those noted were or are evil.
Late music
С наступающим новым годом!
Happy New Year to all well-intentioned readers of the blog!
Ian Robert Millard 
How Good Are Vladimir Putin’s Spies?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfRdJ98XJz8
LikeLike
An excellent video that poses uncomfortable questions:
LikeLike
Claudius:
Yes. Most interesting.
I have to admit that I was unaware that the Bundesrepublik banned as many as 30,000+ books. I would have guessed something “merely” in the hundreds (starting with Mein Kampf, of course).
As you may know, the Jewish-lobby success in David Irving’s ill-advised libel action resulted in his publishers pulping tens of thousands of copies, maybe more, of his high-selling books. Fortunately, they are now available elsewhere.
“They” (the “you-know-who” element) are often, in fact usually, those behind attacks on freedom of expression, of course.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I will never understand why David Irving did such a stupid thing as suing that horrible creature, Lipstadt. You were right by using the words “ill-advised”. Having said that, if I remember correctly, he even made a bigger mistake by refusing legal representation. What a shame! A brilliant career of decades destroyed in a few weeks.
LikeLike
Claudius:
I did not know Irving, though I had peripheral contact with him a couple of times. My assessment of him, in terms of personality, was that he was almost arrogantly self-confident, supremely sure —perhaps over-sure— of his intellectual ability, and rather suspicious of the motives of others, too.
That combination led him to launch a libel action without (as far as I know) obtaining the advice of a legal specialist (I am assuming that such was the case, but I cannot see that any competent lawyer would have advised him to launch an action on the facts as known). It also led him to fail to see the potential downsides of taking such an action and then failing to achieve victory.
In my opinion, those same character traits led Irving to think that he had “no choice” but to sue, because (I think he thought) the entire world could see that his reputation was being trashed by that old Jewess, Lipstadt. In reality, the world in general, meaning the big wide world, took little interest in his activity, and even less in the pronouncements of some old American Jewish lesbian academic.
In Irving’s world, Irving was the centre of the world as a whole (imo), whereas the world is a rather big place, and a spat between a British historian and an American Jewish academic as to whether, or how many, Jews might have been killed in the early 1940s, and how they expired, or by whose agency they expired, is not really world or even national news at all. Even then, over half a century had passed since the years in question.
Had Irving just ignored the Lipstadt “libel”, which was in a book which (but for Irving’s action) would have remained utterly obscure, Irving would have been able to carry on writing, being published and sold by mainstream publishers and bookshops etc. Reports were that, prior to the libel trial, sales of Lipstadt’s book were “tiny“.
I doubt that she made big money from the book even after the trial, but sales must have grown after all the publicity.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with you in your assessment of Irving´s character. For some strange twist of fate, an old friend of mine and his wife, who are both extremely well-read and well-bred, had the opportunity to visit Irving in the mid-1980s. They both found Irving ungracious and quite full of himself. Your own experience confirms their opinion, and mine.
LikeLike
I do agree wholeheartedly with you about fox-hunting. In fact, I hate all hunters. F… psychopaths who enjoy murdering defenceless animals that do not represent any danger to them. Not only that, they have the cheek to call it “sport”! May all of them have a horrible end, like the poor creatures they murder for fun.
LikeLike
An interesting video with a sarcastic analysis of Starmer´s and Farage´s New Year speeches. A good example of talking without saying anything at all. The young man analysing and commenting on the speeches is spot on. Starmer looks like an incredibly bad actor; you can tell he does not believe a word he says.
They Promised 2026 Will Be Better
LikeLike