Afternoon music
Ukraine’s demographic collapse
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqxd9549y4xo
“Facing a demographic catastrophe, Ukraine is paying for troops to freeze their sperm.“
[BBC News]
Ukraine faces an enhanced version of the population slide that all Europe (and Russia) faces.
White Europe faces population decline, perhaps an imminent catastrophe, while the blacks, and also some “browns” (Pakistanis and Bangladeshis, mainly) continue to breed prolifically (including inside Europe), and to invade White Europe both by births and by migration invasion.
Tweets seen
The Aryan or post-Aryan legacy.
Those tweets refer to the court victory of James Wilson, a Northern academic, over the Jewish lobby, including Mark Lewis, Daniel Berke, and Beth Grossman, a Jewish barrister.
Wilson v. Mendelsohn, Newbon (deceased) and Cantor. See the blog search box for more.
Well, after all, they would not want to start telling the public the truth…
I agree. Reform UK is only the means to an end, i.e. destruction of the “three main parties” System-scam. After Reform, comes the only or final solution— social nationalism.
Would translate to a Commons with about 321 MPs (slightly less than an overall majority, 131 Labour, 58 Cons, 54 LibDems, 39 SNP, 11 Greens [etc].
Reform is not enthusing people, but is being grasped at as the only non-LibLabCon alternative at present.
The fact is that, even if Reform fails to break through the 30% barrier at a general election, it will still triumph so long as Lab and Con remain in the doldrums of 15%-25%, and I see no immediate (if any) prospect of that changing. If anything, a further slide for both.
It can be seen that the Kiev regime, without battlefield successes for at least a year, has turned to terroristic operations: assassinations, car bombings etc. A sign of weakness.
Late tweets seen
What “deaths“? Can she mean the “holocaust” farrago?
That is what happens when white people think that they can live with some kind of proposed multikulti “rainbow” society. Eventually it must slide and collapse into a dystopian hellscape. Only the Aryan can give new life. A “mixed” society will eventually fall into chaos, and will leave only ruins in the jungle.
No compromise. No surrender.
If any such talking heads say one word against Jewry, the Jewish/Israel lobby gets onto them immediately, and has them “cancelled”, so the radio/TV/Press careers end right there. Intimidation is their main weapon. It only works, though, if people are afraid of losing careers, monies etc.
Quelle surprise. I myself never use such communication methods.
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
Some thoughts:
-Rupert Lowe and his team should take great care to exclude the (((REDACTEDS))) from having any influence whatsoever in Restore Britain.
Whenever the (((REDACTEDS))) are allowed into a movement, (((they))) invariably subvert the original purposes of the movement, and redirect the organization to serving (((REDACTED))) interests.
This is precisely what happened with MAGA, and before that, the Tea Party movement of the early 2010s, and before that the Republican Revolution of the 1990s, and before that, the Reagan Revolution.
In each of the above cases, the (((REDACTEDS))) infiltrated and subverted grassroots patriotic movements, and redirected those movements to serve (((REDACTED))) interests.
Before long, all of the original purposes of those movements were discarded, and those movements became vehicles for promoting zionism and (((REDACTED))) supremacy.
That is EXACTLY what happened with MAGA. It started as an American Nationalist movement, implicitly Pro-White, and dedicated to promoting a non-interventionist, America First set of policies.
Then the (((REDACTEDS))) insinuated themselves into leading positions in MAGA, took control of the ship, and turned it into a neocon, warmongering, zionist movement.
Now (((they))) are trying to start a war against Iran, while the brainless MAGA base lemmings dismiss the epstein files as a “Democrat hoax”.
That is what happens when the (((REDACTEDS))) are allowed into a patriotic movement. In short order, the movement is subverted.
If Rupert Lowe wants to avoid that happening to Restore Britain, he must ensure that the (((REDACTEDS))) are not allowed to have any influence in his movement.
-On a related note, the reason the Tory Party turned into a party of traitors, is because of (((REDACTED))) subversion.
In the 1800s, the Tories were, for the most part, a patriotic party dedicated to Britain’s best interests.
But then they stupidly elected the (((REDACTED))) Disraeli as leader, and the (((subversion))) commenced, greatly enabled by parliament’s earlier 1858 decision to allow (((REDACTEDS))) to be MPs.
Other extremely important factors included the British establishment allowing the (((REDACTEDS))) to buy up British newspapers, thus controlling public opinion, and the traitorous decision of many British aristocrats to marry (((REDACTED))) heiresses.
By the late 1800s, there were already numerous (((REDACTEDS))) in parliament, and judges with names such as (((Lopes))) sitting in judgment over White British people.
By the early 1900s, the (((REDACTEDS))) had fully taken over the Liberal Party (and the emerging Labor Party), while simultaneously burrowing deeply into the British Tory aristocracy.
The (((REDACTEDS))) demonstrated (((their))) influence by getting (((rufus isaacs))) appointed as a Marquess and as Imperial Viceroy of India.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rufus_Isaacs,_1st_Marquess_of_Reading
(((They))) also got (((isaac isaacs))) appointed as Governor-General of Australia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Isaacs
Both of these instances, and many others, were intended as a slap in the face to the White British. The (((REDACTEDS))) wanted to show off how (((they))) were in charge.
In the 1930s, a relatively small but valiant group of Tory aristocrats such as Archibald Maule-Ramsay, Sir Barry Domvile, the 12th Duke of Bedford, and the 9th Earl of Portsmouth, among others, made a desperate attempt to avert war and regain control of the Conservative Party.
It was the last stand of the aristocratic High Tories, and it was unfortunately too little, too late, and it was only a small minority of the Tory elites who even bothered to try.
The vast majority of Tory MPs and peers were apathetic, and couldn’t be bothered to get involved. They weren’t pro-(((REDACTED))). They were simply lazy cowards, content to enjoy living lavishly while the (((REDACTEDS))) manipulated Britain into war.
And of course, with war came the end of the Empire, the end of Britain as a world power, and the influx of third world immigrants.
Fast forward to the present day, and the Tory Party is a fully social liberal party, which doesn’t care about conserving anything except (((REDACTED))) supremacy, “israel”, and low taxes for the (((elites))).
ALL of this could have been avoided if (((REDACTED))) infiltration into the British establishment was nipped in the bud and blocked back in the 1800s.
But unfortunately, the British elites were too complacent, too apathetic, too self-centered, and too corrupt to do anything to stop the (((takeover))) of Britain by the (((REDACTEDS))).
It is absolutely vital that the British patriots of today LEARN FROM and AVOID the mistakes of the past.
The complacent lazy British elites of the 1800s and early 1900s could at least claim “well, we didn’t know the full extent of the destruction the (((REDACTEDS))) intended to implement.”
The British patriots of today have no such excuse. It is blatantly obvious that the (((REDACTEDS))) fully intend to genocide the British people.
Therefore, it is of utmost importance that British patriot movements such as Restore Britain make certain to EXCLUDE the (((REDACTEDS))) from obtaining any level of influence within these patriotic movements.
-Another thought:
Do you think it is possible that the Tories and Reform will split the rightwing vote, and allow Labor to win many constituencies?
For example, in a constituency, if Reform get 27% and the Tories get 22% and Labor get 29%, then Labor would win despite being overwhelmingly outnumbered by the combined Tory+Reform vote.
I have mixed feelings about such an outcome.
On the one hand, I don’t want Britain to have to suffer under 5 more years of Labor.
But on the other hand, if Reform and the Tories annihilate each other, that could create an opportunity for a truly nationalistic movement (Restore Britain?) to emerge as the main right-wing party.
Also, I think that Farage as Prime Minister might be counterproductive, since he will serve as a “safety valve” and lull a lot of patriotic voters back to sleep, while the demographic replacement continues.
What do you think? Is it possible that the Tories and Reform will destroy each other, allowing a nationalist party to fill the vacuum?
And might another Labor victory at the next election (due to the Tories and Reform splitting the right-wing vote) be likely to make people angry enough to support a Pro-White party?
The conventional wisdom would be that any right-wing victory is preferable to any left-wing victory.
But that thinking may be short-sighted.
If Mitt Romney had won in 2012, Trump and MAGA would never have gotten off the ground, because the anger of right-wing voters would have dissipated with Romney in charge.
It took 8 long years of humiliation under Obama to radicalize conservative American voters to the point where they were willing to support Trump instead of conventional Republican candidates.
Might that be the case with British right-wing voters too?
A Reform victory would quell their anger. They would say “everything is OK, Farage is in charge now!” and go back to sleep.
But another Labor victory might really radicalize White British voters and make them angry enough to support a Pro-White movement.
Of course, the looming issue is demographics. Labor would use additional time in power to flood Britain with even more immigrants.
But would Reform really make more than symbolic changes?
I don’t know.
I want a Pro-White movement in power in Britain.
What do you think? Would another Labor victory make that more likely to happen? Or would another Labor victory have detrimental consequences such as driving right-wing voters back to the Traitor Tories?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apologies if this comment posts twice. It didn’t seem to post the first time.
Some thoughts:
-Rupert Lowe and his team should take great care to exclude the (((REDACTEDS))) from having any influence whatsoever in Restore Britain.
Whenever the (((REDACTEDS))) are allowed into a movement, (((they))) invariably subvert the original purposes of the movement, and redirect the organization to serving (((REDACTED))) interests.
This is precisely what happened with MAGA, and before that, the Tea Party movement of the early 2010s, and before that the Republican Revolution of the 1990s, and before that, the Reagan Revolution.
In each of the above cases, the (((REDACTEDS))) infiltrated and subverted grassroots patriotic movements, and redirected those movements to serve (((REDACTED))) interests.
Before long, all of the original purposes of those movements were discarded, and those movements became vehicles for promoting zionism and (((REDACTED))) supremacy.
That is EXACTLY what happened with MAGA. It started as an American Nationalist movement, implicitly Pro-White, and dedicated to promoting a non-interventionist, America First set of policies.
Then the (((REDACTEDS))) insinuated themselves into leading positions in MAGA, took control of the ship, and turned it into a neocon, warmongering, zionist movement.
Now (((they))) are trying to start a war against Iran, while the brainless MAGA base lemmings dismiss the epstein files as a “Democrat hoax”.
That is what happens when the (((REDACTEDS))) are allowed into a patriotic movement. In short order, the movement is subverted.
If Rupert Lowe wants to avoid that happening to Restore Britain, he must ensure that the (((REDACTEDS))) are not allowed to have any influence in his movement.
-On a related note, the reason the Tory Party turned into a party of traitors, is because of (((REDACTED))) subversion.
In the 1800s, the Tories were, for the most part, a patriotic party dedicated to Britain’s best interests.
But then they stupidly elected the (((REDACTED))) Disraeli as leader, and the (((subversion))) commenced, greatly enabled by parliament’s earlier 1858 decision to allow (((REDACTEDS))) to be MPs.
Other extremely important factors included the British establishment allowing the (((REDACTEDS))) to buy up British newspapers, thus controlling public opinion, and the traitorous decision of many British aristocrats to marry (((REDACTED))) heiresses.
By the late 1800s, there were already numerous (((REDACTEDS))) in parliament, and judges with names such as (((Lopes))) sitting in judgment over White British people.
By the early 1900s, the (((REDACTEDS))) had fully taken over the Liberal Party (and the emerging Labor Party), while simultaneously burrowing deeply into the British Tory aristocracy.
The (((REDACTEDS))) demonstrated (((their))) influence by getting (((rufus isaacs))) appointed as a Marquess and as Imperial Viceroy of India.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rufus_Isaacs,_1st_Marquess_of_Reading
(((They))) also got (((isaac isaacs))) appointed as Governor-General of Australia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Isaacs
Both of these instances, and many others, were intended as a slap in the face to the White British. The (((REDACTEDS))) wanted to show off how (((they))) were in charge.
In the 1930s, a relatively small but valiant group of Tory aristocrats such as Archibald Maule-Ramsay, Sir Barry Domvile, the 12th Duke of Bedford, and the 9th Earl of Portsmouth, among others, made a desperate attempt to avert war and regain control of the Conservative Party.
It was the last stand of the aristocratic High Tories, and it was unfortunately too little, too late, and it was only a small minority of the Tory elites who even bothered to try.
The vast majority of Tory MPs and peers were apathetic, and couldn’t be bothered to get involved. They weren’t pro-(((REDACTED))). They were simply lazy cowards, content to enjoy living lavishly while the (((REDACTEDS))) manipulated Britain into war.
And of course, with war came the end of the Empire, the end of Britain as a world power, and the influx of third world immigrants.
Fast forward to the present day, and the Tory Party is a fully social liberal party, which doesn’t care about conserving anything except (((REDACTED))) supremacy, “israel”, and low taxes for the (((elites))).
ALL of this could have been avoided if (((REDACTED))) infiltration into the British establishment was nipped in the bud and blocked back in the 1800s.
But unfortunately, the British elites were too complacent, too apathetic, too self-centered, and too corrupt to do anything to stop the (((takeover))) of Britain by the (((REDACTEDS))).
It is absolutely vital that the British patriots of today LEARN FROM and AVOID the mistakes of the past.
The complacent lazy British elites of the 1800s and early 1900s could at least claim “well, we didn’t know the full extent of the destruction the (((REDACTEDS))) intended to implement.”
The British patriots of today have no such excuse. It is blatantly obvious that the (((REDACTEDS))) fully intend to genocide the British people.
Therefore, it is of utmost importance that British patriot movements such as Restore Britain make certain to EXCLUDE the (((REDACTEDS))) from obtaining any level of influence within these patriotic movements.
-Another thought:
Do you think it is possible that the Tories and Reform will split the rightwing vote, and allow Labor to win many constituencies?
For example, in a constituency, if Reform get 27% and the Tories get 22% and Labor get 29%, then Labor would win despite being overwhelmingly outnumbered by the combined Tory+Reform vote.
I have mixed feelings about such an outcome.
On the one hand, I don’t want Britain to have to suffer under 5 more years of Labor.
But on the other hand, if Reform and the Tories annihilate each other, that could create an opportunity for a truly nationalistic movement (Restore Britain?) to emerge as the main right-wing party.
Also, I think that Farage as Prime Minister might be counterproductive, since he will serve as a “safety valve” and lull a lot of patriotic voters back to sleep, while the demographic replacement continues.
What do you think? Is it possible that the Tories and Reform will destroy each other, allowing a nationalist party to fill the vacuum?
And might another Labor victory at the next election (due to the Tories and Reform splitting the right-wing vote) be likely to make people angry enough to support a Pro-White party?
The conventional wisdom would be that any right-wing victory is preferable to any left-wing victory.
But that thinking may be short-sighted.
If Mitt Romney had won in 2012, Trump and MAGA would never have gotten off the ground, because the anger of right-wing voters would have dissipated with Romney in charge.
It took 8 long years of humiliation under Obama to radicalize conservative American voters to the point where they were willing to support Trump instead of conventional Republican candidates.
Might that be the case with British right-wing voters too?
A Reform victory would quell their anger. They would say “everything is OK, Farage is in charge now!” and go back to sleep.
But another Labor victory might really radicalize White British voters and make them angry enough to support a Pro-White movement.
Of course, the looming issue is demographics. Labor would use additional time in power to flood Britain with even more immigrants.
But would Reform really make more than symbolic changes?
I don’t know.
I want a Pro-White movement in power in Britain.
What do you think? Would another Labor victory make that more likely to happen? Or would another Labor victory have detrimental consequences such as driving right-wing voters back to the Traitor Tories?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Friend of Britain:
Your comment(s) are approved and posted. Comments do not post until approved for publication. I rarely block comments, even if critical, but if I am occupied elsewhere, the comment will not be published until my return.
As to your raising the questions mentioned, I doubt that Reform in government would do much to truly reform the UK’s society and politics. The Jew-Zionist influence is already well-embedded in Reform UK. Also, it is clear that, while Reform probably would stop the “small boats” invasion, that is no more than 5% of the whole, if that. “Legal” or lawful immigration is by far the greater part. Then there are births to non-Europeans already here, both to non-European women, and also to white women impregnated by non-whites.
In the end, I hope that Reform will destroy the structures of Labour and Conservative parties by reason of electoral success, but hold out little hope for it as a truly national government (if it gets into government). If Labour holds on, which seems to me unlikely, then the present decline will continue, as I think it would also under Reform, though efforts might then be made (albeit probably wrongheadedly) to stop the slide.
LikeLiked by 1 person
ANDREW ARRESTED! What a joke. This is food for the idiotic masses who feed on this kind of useless rubbish (I think it is called “slop”). Mark my words, nothing will happen to this obnoxious, arrogant bastard. He has been filling his pockets through illegal transactions for decades. These people are clearly above the law, unless they commit some awful crime which they cannot cover, like the famous case of the 4th Earl Ferrers.
The Shocking and Sensational Case of the 4th Earl Ferrers
LikeLike
Claudius:
I also doubt that anything much, in terms of criminal sanction, will happen to Andrew Windsor. He will probably weasel out of it, though it is pretty obvious that the Jew Epstein may have and, realistically, must have acquired some interesting and lucrative commercial intelligence from him; possibly military, naval, and political intelligence as well. The Israelis had a good secondary source there.
As a “disgraced and disbarred” former barrister (as the Jews call me), I am interested in the “sovereign immunity” aspect. Normally, it applies to heads of state when visiting the UK, akin to diplomatic immunity, and it was international customary law, as adopted and/or altered by the Vienna Convention, but has been partly put on a statutory basis in the UK since 1978:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Immunity_Act_1978
Under customary law, family members of a head of state also have immunity, though the ambit of that has been questioned over the years (eg, in the UK, in respect of “princes” and “princesses” from Saudi Arabia (there are, I believe, hundreds) who abused their status in this country, eg by ordering luxury items never paid for.
Andrew Windsor is not a head of state, but is a “close relative” of the Head of State.
Seems that, in the UK as in USA etc, a relative has to be very close, really part of the household, and/or a dependant, to have immunity. Andrew’s case may be a grey area. After all, he is the King’s brother, and moreover is dependent— the King is even giving him his new house.
An overview from a leading City of London law firm:
https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/arbitration/2013-07/uk-court-of-appeal-considers-the-immunity-from-suit-of-the-family-of-a-head-of-state
Note that, in the comment of the law firm noted upon the judgment of the Court of Appeal,
“It should be noted that this case deals with personal immunity (ratione personae), rather than functional immunity (ratione materiae), which operates when an individual acts in his official capacity on behalf of his state.”
It seems that Andrew Windsor is being investigated partly as to potential liability when he was acting in his official capacity, so he may yet be able to claim immunity.
Interesting questions. I may put all that on the blog today.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you very much for the interesting and involved aspects of the law when dealing with high-ranking (alleged) crooks. I am sure Andrew is guilty of a lot of illegal dealings, particularly with the notoriously corrupt Saudis. Having said that, I believe he will be able to “weasel out of it” as you so aptly put it.
As my father used to say: “There are two sets of rules/laws; one for the wealthy and mighty, and another for us, the plebs”
LikeLike
Claudius:
Glad you found it interesting. The allegations against Andrew Windsor are twofold really— the sex trafficking/sex assault aspect(s), and the possible misuse of, or leaking of, secret information.
LikeLike
This beautiful song is the German version of the ‘Ballad of the Green Berets’ recorded by Sergeant Barry Sadler, which was a huge hit in 1966. The German lyrics, written by Ernst Bader (1914-1999), a German composer who fought in the war, speak of the nostalgia felt by a simple soldier who does not understand why he is fighting in a distant country, but who, at the same time, is aware that there is no way out and that he must carry on till the end. I find it very moving, and I am sure millions of old soldiers must have felt that way. Very sad.
„Hundert Mann und ein Befehl“ • Beste Version | (+Lyrics) – YouTube
LikeLike
Claudius:
Thanks.
LikeLike
I forgot to post the translation, sorry!
ONE HUNDRED MEN AND ONE ORDER
Somewhere in a foreign land
We march through stone and sand
Far from home and outlawed
A hundred men and I’m one of them
A hundred men and an order
And a way that no one wants
day in and day out, who knows where we go
Scorched land, what’s the meaning of it?
All alone in the dark night
I’ve often thoughtabout it.
That far from here, the full moon shines
And far away from me, a girl is crying
And the world is so beautiful
Would I see you again?
Now a long year
has separated us
because an order was our fate
Fate strikes indiscriminately
Today it would be me and tomorrow you
I hear the crows crying from afar
In the dawn, why must this be?
Somewhere in a foreign land
We march through stone and sand
Far from home and outlawed
A hundred men and I’m one of them
LikeLike