Diary Blog, 10 March 2026, including a few thoughts about historical revision and revisionism

Afternoon music

[Rembrandt, Man in Armour, modelled by Rembrandt’s son, Titus, but thought to be a representation of Christian Rosenkreutz; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Rosenkreuz]

Tweets seen

Translates to a Commons with about 330 Reform UK MPs (small overall majority), 72 LibDems (weak official Opposition), 66 Lab, 56 Cons, 53 Greens, 44 SNP [etc].

Same story as in most recent polling: Reform in government, the rest straggling more or less together in its wake.

Perhaps so, but when oh when will Goodwin and all the other politicos, talking heads, and “mainstream” scribblers stand up for free speech on the subject of Judaism, Zionism and, in a word, Jews?

The Jewish/Israel lobby is the main one trying to close down free speech in this country,.

You read it here first (as usual)…

The Americans are, once again, doing the [Israeli] Jews’ work.

Fact is, there is a fifth column in the UK, USA etc, and it is a pro-Israel Jewish lobby fifth column. Not all Jews support it, or are part of it, but a great many, probably the majority of them, do support it and Israel. There are also non-Jews who (bribed, intimidated, or just stupid) who are part of it, or controlled, in effect, by it.

[“Hypersonic Fatah (“Victory”) Missile breaking through Iron Dome air defence missiles to land in Tel Aviv.“]

Hard to know whether the targeting is more or less random, or whether the Iranians are seeking out locations used by MOSSAD etc.

[“A Spanish journalist based in the Israel:
We can show where the missile hit, but only on the condition that we show civilian buildings.

If, for example, there is a “Mossad” headquarters or a government building behind a destroyed building, the “Israeli” military censorship department does not allow us to show these shots or make reports on them, so that Iran does not understand that an important target was hit or does not reveal their vulnerability.

The censorship department requires that all videos be sent to them for verification before publication, and if we do not comply with the rules, our operating license will be revoked.“]

More music

Talking point

An interesting historical conundrum. Many many people are, at long last, waking up to the fact that they have been sold an ahistorical package that simply does not add up in a number of ways (including literally).

As for Schindler’s List, that was a film based on the book Schindler’s Ark by one Thomas Keneally, an Australian born in 1935, who never even left Australia until the late 1960s, and never visited Poland until 1980 or 1981. Even Wikipedia (heavily “edited”, i.e. vandalized, by Jewish individuals and organizations on a number of topics) calls Schindler’s Arkhistorical fiction“. It is no more a work of “history”, as such, than books such as Day of the Jackal.

The film, Schindler’s List, is even less accurate historically.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Keneally

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schindler%27s_Ark

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schindler%27s_List

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_of_the_Jackal_(film)

Incidentally, I myself knew a German lady, now-deceased, and from an aristocratic East Prussian and Austrian background (on the paternal and maternal sides respectively) who, aged only 13, was kept in the Soviet Union as a kind of hostage from 1939 to 1942 (her father was shot), and who managed to escape in the end, arriving in Iran with the (Polish) Anders Army and its dependants, and in time travelling on to British East Africa.

That lady, much later (1950s), lived in London with her British husband (whom she had married in the 1940s in East Africa); her story, in outline, was presented to the once-famous American Jew film director Otto Preminger [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Preminger] by a third party, a writer.

Preminger met that lady, and her far older husband (who had served as a British officer in the First World War) at an expensive hotel in London in, I believe, 1960.

Preminger told the couple that he was seriously interested in making a film about the events described, but that there would have to be one significant change: instead of just escaping from the Soviet Union, she would also have to have been, prior to that, also escaping from German forces…

Needless to add, the couple refused to agree on that basis; the film was therefore never made.

That sort of experience has happened to several people with not-dissimilar stories, though most had not that lady’s extra “glamour” details such as her having met, as a child, luminaries such as Yusupov (who killed Rasputin), and Marshal Mannerheim of Finland (to whom she was in fact distantly related); in fact her family history on the paternal side could be traced back to a Grand Master of the Teutonic Knights and, on the maternal side, to Metternich.

People talk about “historical revision” and “revisionism”, but the real or first “revision” was done from the 1940s onwards by (mostly Jewish) film directors and writers. People are only now finding out that further historical revision is necessary in order to regain historical truth.

More music

Late tweets

A monkey-on-a-stick…

[“Senator Chris Murphy:

“I just came out of a two-hour closed-door meeting about the war. This meeting only confirmed that this war is completely chaotic and lacks coordination.

We will not achieve any of the stated goals.

There is actually no way to destroy their nuclear program, since most of it is underground, unless we start a ground invasion – which would be even more catastrophic and unpopular.”]

The craziness of the Trump White House gets worse. Laughing about an event like that, while at the same time, or same day, holding some kind of weird “pray-in” in the Oval Office etc. Insanity Fair.

Late music

[Serge Marshennikov, Feeling]

2 thoughts on “Diary Blog, 10 March 2026, including a few thoughts about historical revision and revisionism”

  1. Very interesting interview with John Mearsheimer. His analysis of the extraordinary weakness of the Arab Emirates (from minute 8:00 onwards), is very accurate. Those vassal states of the USA are the weakest link in the Jewish-American alliance.

    Like

    1. Claudius:
      I do not claim detailed knowledge of the region, though I have been there a few times. My firm impression of all of the Gulf Arabs (not just UAE —also Qataris and Kuwaitis) can be summed up in one word—“useless“.

      Like

Leave a reply to claudius1889 Cancel reply