Morning music
A stray thought out of season
I was just thinking about admirable scenes from films. One which shows a decision made by someone of real integrity is when “The Jackal”, played in the original film by Edward Fox (ignore the remakes), is told that the French security services have discovered his identity and the nature of his mission— “The Jackal is blown; repeat, the Jackal is blown“, and he therefore has the possibility of abandoning his mission and getting out, as well as keeping the half of his fee which has already been paid upfront. His car reaches a fork in the road on the Cote d’Azur. A signpost points left to Paris, right to Italy. After a momentary hesitation, he guns the engine and drives into France, to the fulfilment of his mission, despite the almost suicidal risk. That is integrity. Class.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_of_the_Jackal_(film)#Plot
Tweets seen
[“Cornell student Austin Franco was doxxed by Jewish business leaders after explaining that he “didn’t want to work for a Jew,” claiming his experiences with Jews were not “pleasant,” after a NYC startup he had applied to reached out to him three times.
After one of the cofounders, Gabe Einhorn, posted Franco’s reply with his last name blocked out, Franco was quickly identified.
Einhorn said he did not “want to ruin his life,” but wanted to “raise awareness” of antisemitism.
Franco, in a now-deleted post, said that in his personal and professional experiences, Jews were tribalistic and vengeful, and tended to ruin and bully others who opposed them.
Franco stated, “I am sure that if you indicated you didn’t want to work for someone who was White or Christian this would not have blown up…”
Franco claimed that the actions by Einhorn and the Jewish community, posting his reply, doxxing him, and then trying to investigate and uproot his personal life, vindicated his concerns that Jews do not work with others politely.“]
Never give in. Never “apologise” to them (they treat it as victory over you and will trample you all the more). Never delete honest and accurate material.
“Kiev”, not “Kyiv” (and certainly not the BBC’s “Keeev“).
In the Middle East, the die is cast.
I understood the paradox long ago: the USA has more military-destructive power than any empire or state in history, and can destroy any force, or whole country, designated as an enemy, yet cannot necessarily use that force without itself suffering mortal injury; also, it has not the ideological will to impose an imperium (not only military-political authority but also a continuing “way of life”) in the way done by the great empires of the past— Hellenic, Roman, Mughal, French, British, Russian/Soviet etc.
The USA should really make the (Israeli) Jews do what the USA requires, by cutting off arms and money, but of course the Israeli/Jewish element is embedded very strongly in Congress, as well as in the American mass media, influential think tanks, publishing, academia etc, as well as, obviously, business and finance.
[$$$ from US taxpayers to Israel, leading to corrupt payments of $$$ from Israel to American legislators. The Americans are therefore paying Israel to corrupt the Americans’ own supposed representatives…].
Monkeyworld UK.
[“Online safety” laws and age verification mandates have absolutely NOTHING to do with protecting children.
You cannot stop under-16s from accessing a website without checking the age of everyone who visits it. And you cannot check everyone’s age without forcing them to prove who they are.
“Child safety” is the cheese in the mousetrap.
Laws sold under the banner of “child protection” constitute a Trojan horse for a system requiring every adult to verify their identity before they can speak, read, or post online. The child is merely an emotional shield. The adult is the real target.
And once that infrastructure exists, the pretext can be swapped out at will.
Today it is pornography, social media and “harmful content”. Tomorrow it is messaging apps and online banking. Soon after it is your ability to access the internet at all—each incremental step gated behind a digital ID you are required to keep in good standing.
It’s no accident that the exact same “online safety” agenda is being rolled out across the entire Western world simultaneously, with each national government reaching for a slightly different pretext to justify the same outcome—a verified digital identity standing between you and the open internet.
Different countries. Different pretexts. Same infrastructure.
They are not building a system to keep children safe. They are building the identity layer for a permission-based internet—orchestrated from the supranational level by people you never elected—where access to information itself becomes conditional on obedience.
The point is not to make the internet safer. The point is to make anonymous access impossible.
Because a person who can read, speak, organise and dissent anonymously is difficult to control. A person whose most intimate online activity is anchored to a state-monitored digital ID is not.
Once every account, search, post, payment, message and website visit is tied to a verified identity, the internet stops being a public square and becomes a monitored enclosure.
But the gate only closes if people accept “online safety” laws at face value”]
Morning music
A stray thought out of season
I was just thinking about admirable scenes from films. One which shows a decision made by someone of real integrity is when “The Jackal”, played in the original film by Edward Fox (ignore the remakes), is told that the French security services have discovered his identity and the nature of his mission— “The Jackal is blown; repeat, the Jackal is blown“, and he therefore has the possibility of abandoning his mission and getting out, as well as keeping the half of his fee which has already been paid upfront. His car reaches a fork in the road on the Cote d’Azur. A signpost points left to Paris, right to Italy. After a momentary hesitation, he guns the engine and drives into France, to the fulfilment of his mission, despite the almost suicidal risk. That is integrity. Real class.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_of_the_Jackal_(film)#Plot
Tweets seen
[“Cornell student Austin Franco was doxxed by Jewish business leaders after explaining that he “didn’t want to work for a Jew,” claiming his experiences with Jews were not “pleasant,” after a NYC startup he had applied to reached out to him three times.
After one of the cofounders, Gabe Einhorn, posted Franco’s reply with his last name blocked out, Franco was quickly identified.
Einhorn said he did not “want to ruin his life,” but wanted to “raise awareness” of antisemitism.
Franco, in a now-deleted post, said that in his personal and professional experiences, Jews were tribalistic and vengeful, and tended to ruin and bully others who opposed them.
Franco stated, “I am sure that if you indicated you didn’t want to work for someone who was White or Christian this would not have blown up…”
Franco claimed that the actions by Einhorn and the Jewish community, posting his reply, doxxing him, and then trying to investigate and uproot his personal life, vindicated his concerns that Jews do not work with others politely.“]
Never give in. Never “apologise” to them (they treat it as victory over you and will trample you all the more). Never delete honest and accurate material.
“Kiev”, not “Kyiv” (and certainly not the BBC’s “Keeev“).
In the Middle East, the die is cast.
I understood the paradox long ago: the USA has more military-destructive power than any empire or state in history, and can destroy any force, or whole country, designated as an enemy, yet cannot necessarily use that force without itself suffering mortal injury; also, it has not the ideological will to impose an imperium (not only military-political authority but also a continuing “way of life”) in the way done by the great empires of the past— Hellenic, Roman, Mughal, French, British, Russian/Soviet etc.
The USA should really make the (Israeli) Jews do what the USA requires, by cutting off arms and money, but of course the Israeli/Jewish element is embedded very strongly in Congress, as well as in the American mass media, influential think tanks, publishing, academia etc, as well as, obviously, business and finance.
[$$$ from US taxpayers to Israel, leading to corrupt payments of $$$ from Israel to American legislators. The Americans are therefore paying Israel to corrupt the Americans’ own supposed representatives…].
Monkeyworld UK.
[“Online safety” laws and age verification mandates have absolutely NOTHING to do with protecting children.
You cannot stop under-16s from accessing a website without checking the age of everyone who visits it. And you cannot check everyone’s age without forcing them to prove who they are.
“Child safety” is the cheese in the mousetrap.
Laws sold under the banner of “child protection” constitute a Trojan horse for a system requiring every adult to verify their identity before they can speak, read, or post online. The child is merely an emotional shield. The adult is the real target.
And once that infrastructure exists, the pretext can be swapped out at will.
Today it is pornography, social media and “harmful content”. Tomorrow it is messaging apps and online banking. Soon after it is your ability to access the internet at all—each incremental step gated behind a digital ID you are required to keep in good standing.
It’s no accident that the exact same “online safety” agenda is being rolled out across the entire Western world simultaneously, with each national government reaching for a slightly different pretext to justify the same outcome—a verified digital identity standing between you and the open internet.
Different countries. Different pretexts. Same infrastructure.
They are not building a system to keep children safe. They are building the identity layer for a permission-based internet—orchestrated from the supranational level by people you never elected—where access to information itself becomes conditional on obedience.
The point is not to make the internet safer. The point is to make anonymous access impossible.
Because a person who can read, speak, organise and dissent anonymously is difficult to control. A person whose most intimate online activity is anchored to a state-monitored digital ID is not.
Once every account, search, post, payment, message and website visit is tied to a verified identity, the internet stops being a public square and becomes a monitored enclosure.
But the gate only closes if people accept “online safety” laws at face value”]
Starmer-stein and his Cabinet are tyrants. Historically, tyrants have often had to be removed by direct popular action.
Does Andrew Neil really believe this has anything at all to do with “protecting children”? If so, he is less perspicacious than I had thought.
Many will have been headed to the UK; many more just like them are still en route. Backward migrant-invaders.
That was just one of them. Hundreds of thousands arrive every year now. To remove or eliminate them will be a Herculean and apocalyptic task.
I know what should happen, but cannot express it, not in our supposedly “free” country…
Question to Google AI about how the “under-16s” social media ban will affect adults in the UK
“how will the new under-16 social media ban affect those above the age of 18?
The new under-16 social media ban will primarily affect adults by requiring them to undergo strict age-verification checks, such as uploading government IDs or submitting to facial age-estimation scans, to access their own accounts. Because the law forces tech companies to police the age limit under threat of massive fines, platforms must prove all active users are old enough to be there. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Mandatory Age Checks
Adults will no longer be able to simply check a box to state they are over 18. Platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and X are rolling out Highly Effective Age Assurance (HEAA) measures. To log in or keep an active account, adults must use methods like facial analysis scanning, uploading passports or driving licences, or verifying through a bank account. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Increased Privacy and Data Concerns [1]
Civil liberties groups and digital experts note that this creates a system where adults must continuously hand over sensitive personal data to big tech firms. This has sparked criticism that the ban functions as a “digital ID by the back door,” raising prominent concerns about how securely adult data will be stored, monitored, and protected. [1, 2]“
[from Google AI]
Police state, by any other name…
Ian Robert Millard 
I do not understand why Jews want to live in Christian countries like the USA, Germany, Austria, the United Kingdom anyway for.
Their religion is totally different to ours and historically many Jews have been found to hate Christians and ‘goys’ as they refer to us as. In Israel, many Jews spit at Christian tourists.
At any rate, they now have their own bandit, continual international law defying, evil, terroristic inclined, Zionist state to live in so why do they not bugger off there? In Israel they can be free from we evil Christians and ‘goys’.
Israel is the wrong place for a Jewish state to be established. As well as the wicked oppression of Palestinians having become an inevitabilty since there was an already large indigenous Palestinian population living there the land area of it is too small to accomodate even 60% of the world’s Jews let alone 90% plus. Israel, even now, only has about 45% plus of the world Jewish population.
What is the point in having a supposedly ‘Jewish’ state if such a country does not contain at least 50% plus of global Jewry? Unless the Rothschild Zionist state was established to provide a worldwide base for Zionist troublemaking and a safehouse for Zionist criminals.
The plan to have a Jewish homeland in the then French territory of Madagasgar was better since it is an island and far larger than Palestine/Israel thus it would have been more practical to settle a higher percentage of Jews there and the oppression of Palestinians would not have come about. If we ask that nice Mr Putin, perhaps he might extend the borders of that ‘second though not independent Jewish state’ that Stalin established in Siberia. That place could one day provide a bigger homeland for the world’s Jews and perhaps an independent Jewish state.
Zionist troublemaking Jews should leave the USA, France, Britain, Germany ect. We have tolerated their troublemaking for far too long.
A small number of Ultra-Orthadox Hasidic Jews living here and in America, Belgium are acceptable since they, for the most part, do not create trouble like the Zionist Pro Israeli/Jewish Supremacist ones do. They rarely get involved in politics, work in the media ect and as long as we leave them alone they will return the favour. An insular community like the Amish people in America they are but, for the most part, non troublemaking thus tolerable.
LikeLike
John:
Without being flippant, the term “apex predator” comes to mind.
LikeLike
The ‘British’ government has been telling families of anti-white racist murders and attacks to shut-up and put-out pro multi-racial statements for decades both under the present globalist, anti-British vermin regime and those similar adminstrations from the so-called Conservative Party.
It is utterly repellent and despicable behavior but all too typical of the globalist traitors.
These scumbags surely know in their heart of hearts that their beloved multi-racial/multi-cultural experiment is a total failure mostly because it was imposed upon us with no real form of democratic consent being obtained via FAIR general elections or a specific referendum before it was put into effect yet they still can’t acknowledge this in public so they prefer to disgracefully harrass crime victims’ families.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Ross_Parker
LikeLike
John:
To be quite candid, I thought that the tweets I saw days ago, claiming that the Nowak family had been pressured into making those fake “communitarian” statements, could not be true, even though I recognized that the language used in the statements was not Average Joe language but the usual gobbledegook of the System MPs, social-worker drones, brainwashed police drones etc. I thought maybe they had just had some help in saying what they wanted to say. I was wrong.
We are living in a rapidly-developing fake “communitarian” police state now.
LikeLike
If a family member of mine was murdered or injured in a racially motivated anti-white attack, I would tell the local PC Stazi goons and local MP/councillors to eff off and ‘do one’!
LikeLike
A wretched shambles of a ‘government’ full of childish, moronic clowns. How stupid of ‘British’ governments like this one and the previous Tory cretin show to wreck the internet in this country for no good reason.🙄🙄🙄🤬🤬🤬😡😡😡🤬😡😡🤬🙄🙄🙄🙄🤬🤬🤬😡😡😡🤬🤬🤬
The worldwide revolutionary World Wide Web part of the Internet should be a source of national pride since it was invented by the Briton, Tim Berners-Lee.
LikeLike