Morning music
A stray thought out of season
I was just thinking about admirable scenes from films. One which shows a decision made by someone of real integrity is when “The Jackal”, played in the original film by Edward Fox (ignore the remakes), is told that the French security services have discovered his identity and the nature of his mission— “The Jackal is blown; repeat, the Jackal is blown“, and he therefore has the possibility of abandoning his mission and getting out, as well as keeping the half of his fee which has already been paid upfront. His car reaches a fork in the road on the Cote d’Azur. A signpost points left to Paris, right to Italy. After a momentary hesitation, he guns the engine and drives into France, to the fulfilment of his mission, despite the almost suicidal risk. That is integrity. Class.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_of_the_Jackal_(film)#Plot
Tweets seen
[“Cornell student Austin Franco was doxxed by Jewish business leaders after explaining that he “didn’t want to work for a Jew,” claiming his experiences with Jews were not “pleasant,” after a NYC startup he had applied to reached out to him three times.
After one of the cofounders, Gabe Einhorn, posted Franco’s reply with his last name blocked out, Franco was quickly identified.
Einhorn said he did not “want to ruin his life,” but wanted to “raise awareness” of antisemitism.
Franco, in a now-deleted post, said that in his personal and professional experiences, Jews were tribalistic and vengeful, and tended to ruin and bully others who opposed them.
Franco stated, “I am sure that if you indicated you didn’t want to work for someone who was White or Christian this would not have blown up…”
Franco claimed that the actions by Einhorn and the Jewish community, posting his reply, doxxing him, and then trying to investigate and uproot his personal life, vindicated his concerns that Jews do not work with others politely.“]
Never give in. Never “apologise” to them (they treat it as victory over you and will trample you all the more). Never delete honest and accurate material.
“Kiev”, not “Kyiv” (and certainly not the BBC’s “Keeev“).
In the Middle East, the die is cast.
I understood the paradox long ago: the USA has more military-destructive power than any empire or state in history, and can destroy any force, or whole country, designated as an enemy, yet cannot necessarily use that force without itself suffering mortal injury; also, it has not the ideological will to impose an imperium (not only military-political authority but also a continuing “way of life”) in the way done by the great empires of the past— Hellenic, Roman, Mughal, French, British, Russian/Soviet etc.
The USA should really make the (Israeli) Jews do what the USA requires, by cutting off arms and money, but of course the Israeli/Jewish element is embedded very strongly in Congress, as well as in the American mass media, influential think tanks, publishing, academia etc, as well as, obviously, business and finance.
[$$$ from US taxpayers to Israel, leading to corrupt payments of $$$ from Israel to American legislators. The Americans are therefore paying Israel to corrupt the Americans’ own supposed representatives…].
I admit that, at first, I discounted the various tweets seen a few days ago, which tweets were saying that the fake “communitarian” gobbledegook put out notionally by the family of the murdered boy, Henry Nowak, was in fact forced on that family by the police or others (“the authorities”), but it seems that I was wrong.
I had thought that the typical System language of that family’s communique was simply because some police or “community relations” drone had helped them express their thoughts. As all too often, I was too kind. Seems that the whole thing was a “nudge” unit operation.
It will be recalled that a “high-flying” Civil Service Jew set up the Downing Street “nudge” operation about a decade or so ago, and on the orders of David Cameron-Levita and George Osborne.
Very sinister.
Monkeyworld UK.
[“Online safety” laws and age verification mandates have absolutely NOTHING to do with protecting children.
You cannot stop under-16s from accessing a website without checking the age of everyone who visits it. And you cannot check everyone’s age without forcing them to prove who they are.
“Child safety” is the cheese in the mousetrap.
Laws sold under the banner of “child protection” constitute a Trojan horse for a system requiring every adult to verify their identity before they can speak, read, or post online. The child is merely an emotional shield. The adult is the real target.
And once that infrastructure exists, the pretext can be swapped out at will.
Today it is pornography, social media and “harmful content”. Tomorrow it is messaging apps and online banking. Soon after it is your ability to access the internet at all—each incremental step gated behind a digital ID you are required to keep in good standing.
It’s no accident that the exact same “online safety” agenda is being rolled out across the entire Western world simultaneously, with each national government reaching for a slightly different pretext to justify the same outcome—a verified digital identity standing between you and the open internet.
Different countries. Different pretexts. Same infrastructure.
They are not building a system to keep children safe. They are building the identity layer for a permission-based internet—orchestrated from the supranational level by people you never elected—where access to information itself becomes conditional on obedience.
The point is not to make the internet safer. The point is to make anonymous access impossible.
Because a person who can read, speak, organise and dissent anonymously is difficult to control. A person whose most intimate online activity is anchored to a state-monitored digital ID is not.
Once every account, search, post, payment, message and website visit is tied to a verified identity, the internet stops being a public square and becomes a monitored enclosure.
But the gate only closes if people accept “online safety” laws at face value”]
Starmer-stein and his Cabinet are tyrants. Historically, tyrants have often had to be removed by direct popular action.
She is right.
Does Andrew Neil really believe this has anything at all to do with “protecting children”? If so, he is less perspicacious than I had thought.
Many will have been headed to the UK; many more just like them are still en route. Backward migrant-invaders.
That was just one of them. Hundreds of thousands arrive every year now. To remove or eliminate them will be a Herculean and apocalyptic task.
I know what should happen, but cannot express it, not in our supposedly “free” country…
Question to Google AI about how the “under-16s” social media ban will affect adults in the UK
“how will the new under-16 social media ban affect those above the age of 18?
The new under-16 social media ban will primarily affect adults by requiring them to undergo strict age-verification checks, such as uploading government IDs or submitting to facial age-estimation scans, to access their own accounts. Because the law forces tech companies to police the age limit under threat of massive fines, platforms must prove all active users are old enough to be there. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Mandatory Age Checks
Adults will no longer be able to simply check a box to state they are over 18. Platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and X are rolling out Highly Effective Age Assurance (HEAA) measures. To log in or keep an active account, adults must use methods like facial analysis scanning, uploading passports or driving licences, or verifying through a bank account. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Increased Privacy and Data Concerns [1]
Civil liberties groups and digital experts note that this creates a system where adults must continuously hand over sensitive personal data to big tech firms. This has sparked criticism that the ban functions as a “digital ID by the back door,” raising prominent concerns about how securely adult data will be stored, monitored, and protected. [1, 2]“
[from Google AI]
Police state, by any other name…
Talking point
https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/makerfield-and-the-politics-of-pressure
More tweets seen
[“IMPORTANT :
There seems to be some individuals under the illusion that Remigration won’t result in mass violence on the streets. This is extremely naive and shows lack of understanding in the situation.
Let’s be conservative and say we have 20 million foreigners in Britain – do you think these people will leave just because you asked nicely?
The idea of “friendly Remigration” is childish and shows that people aren’t ready for what’s coming.
I worked with a Sudanese fella before – he watched his entire family get murdered in front of him in the civil war. Do you think he’ll go home just because you asked nicely?
What about the radical Islamists who are here soley to take over? Will they abandon their beliefs because you want them to?
What about the communists who support our replacement, will they change their minds because you promised to do it nicely?
Remigration will cause violence in the streets and many will die on both sides.
This is not a game.
The NRP understands this which is why we are a militant based party, we understand the sacrifices and the suffering that lay ahead of us.
There’s a whole world of suffering coming our way. It’s time to grow up and accept it.
We need a radical government to do radical actions.“]
I believe that the “NRP” is the National Rebirth Party, led by a former soldier called Alek Yerbury:
https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk
Ian Robert Millard 