Afternoon music
Tweets seen
Seems that eccentricity is not confined to the English.
[“In the eyes of some Israelis… In the eyes of a significant number of Israelis, Christian symbolism is offensive. Extremely offensive. So offensive that in some educational institutions, the plus sign “+” is not used in mathematics. What? Yes. The plus sign, which represents addition. Why? Because it resembles a cross. It is considered too offensive for students, so instead, an inverted “t” is used. I’m not joking, you can Google it.“]
The enemies of the world.
Now that I think of it, I believe I read that the same is true of some Jewish schools in the UK, that the plus sign is banned.
RAUS!
…and never forget what (((element))) is behind and always has been behind much of the invasion.
Everyone in Europe should see that brief summary.
Even at my free speech trial in late 2023, the rather pitiful outside Counsel instructed by the “Clown” Prosecution Service made mention of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan as a “conspiracy theory”. I had to put him straight on the spot, and I recall remarking that all he had to do was look around him (e.g. in Southampton, where the trial took place).
See also:
A popular blog post
I notice that a blog post from 2019, which has had hits frequently ever since, had a number of hits today. Nice that people value one’s otherwise unapplauded and certainly unremunerated efforts…
More tweets seen
Whisky wow wow!
Ian Robert Millard 
Most American servicemen and servicewomen belong to a generation of wimps who are encouraged by a decadent society to persist in their cowardly behaviour; hence the “nervous breakdowns” they experience. More likely, these are due to a lack of ice cream or a faulty Internet connection that does not allow them to play their favourite video games.
These despicable weaklings have not taken part in ANY combat operations, and yet, they claim to suffer from “mental issues”. Veterans who experienced REAL combat (infantrymen or Marines in Vietnam) must be disgusted when reading about the “sufferings” of these wimps.
LikeLike
Claudius:
I have met American military people, though mostly long in the past. Some had fought in Vietnam in “elite” formations such as the Rangers and U.S. Marines. They were very solid. I am talking long ago, though— 1970s.
I think that the bulk of the American forces are probably of very low quality, and then there is the fact that women make up about 22% of the USAF, and 16% of the U.S. Army.
LikeLike
I agree with you. The Americans of those days (the 1960s and 1970s) were made of better, stronger stuff. Also, and that is very important, at that time, their armed forces had not been corrupted by the sickening ultra-liberal, neo-marxist ideology of today.
LikeLike