Tag Archives: Religion

Diary Blog, 4 December 2025

Morning music

Talking point

Is that to be, quite soon, the fate of our own present civilization?

See also:

Talking point

Talking point

Talking point

Genocide, Israel is your name“…

Tweets seen

[defendant, ludicrously described by a Lincolnshire newspaper as a “Stamford man“…]

Well said.

I assessed that careerist little blot, Darren Jones, on a previous blog post. As the Germans say, “put a beggar on a horse and he rides it to death“. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darren_Jones.

Married to a “grifting” businesswoman, one Lucy Symons-Jones.

Are there any honest MPs or MP-spouses? Maybe, maybe not.

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erika_(song)]

More?

More music

[painting by Volegov]

More tweets seen

Brave girl.

The enemies of humanity may get their punishment sooner than they imagine.

Kim Leadbeater is a dim lesbian ex-PE teacher who is only an MP because she got sympathy votes after her sister, Jo Cox, was assassinated: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Leadbeater.

She will lose her seat at the next election: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spen_Valley_(UK_Parliament_constituency)#Elections_in_the_2020s.

Translates to a Commons with 348 Reform UK MPs (a solid majority), Labour 127, 53 LibDems, 42 SNP, 38 Cons, 6 Greens, 5 Plaid [etc].

So Labour seeming to recover slightly compared to other recent opinion polls (surprisingly), Greens therefore slipping quite a lot, and Cons still standing (just) with about a third of the MPs they have at present.

May be accurate, may not be. Even 1 point more for Reform, and 1 point less for both Lab and Con, would give Reform another 30 MPs, and slash the Con and Lab numbers accordingly.

Talking point

More tweets seen

Well, a rather different polling result. Greens on 18%?! Can that be right? Who knows, these days?

This one translates to a Commons with about 400 Reform UK MPs, a tremendous result for Farage (if it happens); Greens 58 (making the Green Party the official Opposition); LibDems 48; SNP 44; Cons 39; Labour 25…[etc].

I may be wrong, but that poll seems to me, if anything, more plausible than the earlier one featured today, despite this second poll being quite “off the wall”.

Quite right. Idiots such as Nadine Dorries should be cold-shouldered by Reform UK.

Once the System parties are crushed, Reform can fail and fall, leaving the way open for social nationalism.

[“This is not a trope. This is important information on how the the speech I gave in Leeds this August ended up being unlawfully used as a reason for my arrest today. The Leeds jewish representative council, CAA, CST, JLC and other pro-‘israel’ lobby groups and individuals worked together to make it happen. This is how: They had initially hauled in the: deputy mayor, councillor, MP and Chief constable to have the rally banned or to have us arrested. When this failed, they released a statement demanding a meeting with all the above (attached below). The Jewish Chronicle reported on this coordination and showed how the police did not have an issue with my speech or believe there was any reason to arrest me (initially and for 4 months after): • ‘West Yorkshire Police have said that no offences were committed at the ‘Northerners demo for Palestine’, which took place on Saturday. • The Community Security Trust and Jewish Council: Jewish security group CST told the JC, however, that in its view Aladwan gave an “antisemitic and extreme speech” at the rally. • Pro-‘israel’ jewish Simon Myerson KC, the chair of Leeds Jewish Rep Council: ‘Criticised the police for rejecting a full investigation and “dismissing the possibility of offences.’ ‘Myerson criticised the police response to the speeches. He said: “I was surprised to read the police statement. I have seen and studied the videos. In describing Zionism as ‘Jewish supremacy’, saying Western governments are occupied by Zionism (therefore by Jewish supremacy) and calling for armed resistance, it seems to me that the offences of putting people in fear of violence, harassment and encouragement of terrorism are all worthy of serious consideration. (Critical fabrication: *There was no call for armed resistance*) Myerson: “That would demand a full police investigation. By dismissing the possibility of offences on the say so of an unnamed ‘senior investigating officer’ that investigation is bought to a juddering halt. “I am also mindful of the fact that the police, having refused to act to prevent these speakers making these racist remarks, are now marking their own homework. Any arrest would be bound to raise the question of why this was allowed to happen when the police were warned about it. The obvious conflict is so apparent that I am surprised that West Yorkshire did not ask a different force to take over this investigation. “I am meeting the police on Tuesday morning and I will see if I can get any response to any of these questions then.”’ • Campaign Against ‘Antisemitism’: A spokesperson for Campaign Against Antisemitism said: “Dr Rahmeh Aladwan’s reported rants about Zionism being a form of ‘Jewish supremacy’ and a quarter of MPs being funded by the ‘Israel lobby’ bring the medical profession into disrepute. • The Jewish Leadership Council: Leo Brosh, the JLC’s Yorkshire Regional Manager, said: “On Saturday, two NHS doctors spoke at a demonstration in Leeds City Centre. In the speeches, Jewish schools were singled out and conspiracy theories about our community were amplified. Dr Rahmeh Aladwan also called for the destruction of the state of Israel through armed resistance. These remarks must be taken seriously by West Yorkshire Police and the GMC should finally step up and protect Jewish patients.” – Have a read of the attached post below for more information on the coordination. It took 4 months, but they finally got the arrest they demanded. Free Palestine. Free Britain.“]

[“This morning at 7AM, 10 police officers stormed my house to search the property and arrest me for a speech and X posts – again. This is the second arrest in less than 2 months. The order was from the London Met Police – they travelled to a different city to arrest me – again. I was questioned on X posts mentioning: – jewish supremacy & jewish supremacists – ‘israel’ – ‘israelis’ and ‘israeli’ jews – and their feelings. – Melanie Phillips, the Chief Rabbi: Eprahim Mirvis, Wes Streeting, the General Medical Council (GMC), Emily Schrader – and their feelings regarding my posts responding to them. – Armed resistance (Palestinian) and Oct 7. – The Thawabet (principles of Palestinian liberation) – The Palestinian Naional Charter (1968) – The repatriation of jewish settlers from Palestine One of the posts was my response to Emily Schrader saying ‘FAFO’ with a picture of the martyred Palestinian journalist Saleh Al-Jafarawi. I began crying when I saw his picture and the interview had to be stopped for 10 minutes. I was held for over 7 hours and released on bail conditions (pre-charge): – Not to publish, post, or communicate material or statements that incite hatred, discrimination, or harassment against any individual or group based on race, religion or ethnicity. I told the officer that I do not agree that I have done any of the above and therefore do not know what I am signing for. I was told: ‘ Posts on jewish supremacism’. I do not believe any of the above has much to do with Britain but the majority of the interview was centred on ‘israel’ and ‘israelis’ including their feelings, their entity, and their future. Just to reiterate: I am a British citizen. I am an NHS doctor with 0 patient complaints or clinical errors who has just been suspended for 15 months after a 2 year campaign by the pro-‘israel’ lobby. I am part-Palestinian. I have just witnessed the mass murder of my people by the ‘jewish state’/’israel’ and the IOF – using my tax pounds. I have never incited violence or harm. I have criticised a foreign entity, individuals who identify with and/or support this foreign entity and the genocide it is committing, and the system of oppression underpinning the 100+ years of dispossession, murder, violence, war crimes and crimes against humanity that the Palestinians are enduring. Our freedom of speech and expression, our freedom of assembly and our civil liberties in Britain are under attack. Free Palestine. Free Britain.”]

Yet more Israeli war crimes.

…and just who, which group, is behind most of that, Katie Hopkins? Yes, the “you-know-who” (((group))), which controls Starmer-stein and his Labour Friends of Israel misgovernment.

Ecce the “free” “democratic” Kiev-regime “Ukrainian” (Jew-Zionist) failed state, which bans trade unions, bans dissident political voices, shoots dissidents too, is totally shambolic and corrupt, and which abducts men off the street to be brutally forced onto the crumbling front lines of a lost war.

Late music

[Grotto Pavilion, Tsarskoe Selo, Russia]

Diary Blog, 18 August 2025

Morning music

Tweets seen

Myerson’s comment is improper. He should be reported (again) to the Bar Standards Board: https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/.

Also, there should be reform of this whole outdated and degraded “KC” stuff.

In the 1920s, only a few (3 or 4) KCs were granted “letters patent” annually. Back then, to be “KC” really meant something. Today, almost everyone and his dog sports the “KC” label:

In 1959, there were 181 practising Queen’s Counsel. Between 1966 and 1970, the number of practising QCs increased from 208 to 262. Wikipedia states that this number continued to grow, reaching 404 in 1978 and 601 in 1989.

From 1991 to 2000, the number of practising QCs steadily rose from 736 to 1072. In 1995, 71 QCs were appointed.

In 2006, 175 QCs were appointed out of 443 applicants. 33 of these were women, 10 were from ethnic minority backgrounds, and 4 were solicitors.

Between 1995 and 2023, data shows fluctuation in appointments, ranging from 60 in 1998 to 175 in 2006.

In 2021, 101 KCs (previously QCs) were appointed, including five solicitors.

In 2023 and 2022, 95 KCs were appointed in each year.

In 2024, 95 new KCs were appointed.

In 2025, 105 KCs were appointed, representing the biggest cohort in four years.

Efforts are ongoing to increase diversity among KC appointees, with the Bar Council actively encouraging applications from underrepresented groups and tracking statistics on women, ethnic minority lawyers, and those with disabilities.

[Google AI/Wikipedia]

The “KC” label is now almost worthless, though of course merely being a barrister is even less valuable…

Thousands of persons are now carrying the rank “KC”. Degradation, as with titles such as “lord”, “sir” etc…

“Coalition of the Clowns”.

Anyone deliberately starting large-scale wildfires must be dealt with severely.

“French“? Even Goodwin is, apparently, still infected by politically-correct nonsense-language.

(and, no, I don’t care whether the untermensch may possess a piece of paper saying that he is “French”…).

[“A significant number of British and English people are spontaneously “raising the colours” —flying Union Jack and St George’s Flags on their streets and outside their homes This should be seen for what it is —an act of resistance against mass uncontrolled immigration, broken borders, the decision by politicians to house illegal migrants in the heart of their communities, and the loss of their national identity. The English philosopher Sir Roger Scruton once said “the English are reluctant to display their identity — reluctant to sing their national anthem, to wave their flag, or to affirm their nationhood … But the cost of this reluctance is the steady erosion of something precious —a shared first-person plural.” What he meant by that was the erosion of a “we” —the erosion of a community, an identity, a home. And this is precisely what millions of British and English people now feel, even if many do not yet want to say it out loud—that we are losing a very precious sense of “we”. Mass immigration, open borders, a state policy of multiculturalism that prioritises minorities over the majority, cultural fragmentation, and an aggressive globalism that wants you to believe the only thing that defines people from these islands is not our own distinctive identity, culture, and history but merely welcoming others and celebrating “diversity” … all this has left many people feeling utterly bewildered, lost, demoralised, and in a place that no longer looks or feels like home. This is why some people in Britain and England, on streets like the one below, are “raising the colours”. By flying their flags they are letting us all know that they do exist, they do belong, they do have a home, and there is a “we” they want to reassert and protect, no matter how much the elite class want them and you to think otherwise.“]

“Raise the banners!”…

More Israeli war crimes.

[“Every single Jewish doctor who followed me for at least 6 years, often DMing me for a chat, has either unfollowed or blocked me recently for calling Gaza what it is -an atrocity. Not one of them has ever mentioned starving children in their tweets yet we’ve heard plenty about the hostages. I’m sorry but you shouldn’t be in medicine – they all were (rightly) devastated by the anti-semitism of colleagues after 7/10 yet have shown no empathy whatsoever for innocent Palestinian kids dying of starvation and disease. I’ve kept a very balanced view, sympathy for all sides, always fighting anti-semitism hard but Israel has gone way too far and if you’re standing by that, you’ve lost your way, precious few Israelis are. Israel & Netanyahu are fuelling anti-semitism not girls with leukaemia. If you cannot take a balanced view I don’t want your follow anyway. And tragically the actions of Israel have made it highly unlikely any more hostages will be got out alive.“]

Looks like someone is belatedly and reluctantly coming to certain conclusions about “them”…

Of course, Washington D.C. is largely non-white anyway: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington,_D.C.#Demographics. Not entirely, though. European-origined people are about 38% of the population, and many more reside in the suburbs, in the states of Maryland and Virginia; places such as McLean.

I have to admit that some of that was new to me.

Yes, and not because Farage or Reform are anything much, but simply because the main System parties are hated now, held in utter contempt, and rightly so.

Late music

[painting by Victor Ostrovsky]

Diary Blog, 20 November 2024

Morning music

[under the Chapel, Lincoln’s Inn, London]

The slide to dystopia in the UK continues…

“This British man and former soldier who served his country in Iraq and Afghanistan and has PTSD has just been sent to prison for two years because of what he said on Facebook in the aftermath of Southport.

Here’s what he said: -“Civil war is here. The only thing missing is bullets, that’s the next step.”

-he said he is only racist “to those who suck the life out of our culture. As a culture we are too nice and soft” -“They want us to be Islamic, that’s why they are here.”

-“Come on guys, it’s time to stand up. Everything our ancestors, our grandparents and parents fought for is gone, don’t be scared.”

-he then posted a series of AI images including a child dressed as a medieval knight carrying a sword next to lion with the caption “Time to wake up the lion to save our children’s future”.

-an image that depicted a man wearing what was described in court as “traditional Islamic clothing” with a large knife being held over his head

-and a third image depicting a group of men in traditional Islamic dress chasing a crying child in a Union flag t-shirt in front of the Houses of Parliament.

He was sent to prison for two years.”

One of several ridiculous aspects to political prosecutions of this sort is that, in that case as in many others, the defendant posted certain things, certain comments. He was sentenced, both harshly and absurdly, to 2 years, meaning he will probably serve about 9 months, yet the very same words have now been shared by the Clown Prosecution Service, the police (I believe), the System news media, people such as Matt Goodwin, all those who retweeted Matt Goodwin’s tweet (at time of writing, about 600), and others such as me, as seen hereinabove.

Obviously, that defendant’s words were posted on an earlier date and in, arguably, different circumstances (the now-famous protests and/or “riots”).

As regular readers will know, the Jewish/Zionist/Israel lobby finally procured (via direct political pressure and after a decade of trying) my prosecution, which happened last year, the one-day trial taking place in November 2023. I was sentenced in March 2024, as seen below:

A 9-month “community order”, now almost expired (and, in reality, long-ago finished with), and a financial impost (now paid off via instalments and a crowdfunder). See those earlier blog articles.

Possibly, but if so, by that time Farage will have become even more “System”; he is already going that way, not only pro-Israel but mellow towards the Muslims in the UK.

Britain should join with Russia and mainland Europe, thus creating a loose confederation based on shared values and mutual interests.

The crazy and stupid policy of recent UK governments, provoking and almost directly attacking Russia, is bound to result, in the end, in a major war and, quite likely, the destruction of much of Britain, certainly all the major cities, followed by civil war, social war, and overall chaos.

The intelligent Swedish policy of neutrality saved the Swedes from two massive wars in the 20thC. Looks like the present NWO/ZOG government is going to throw all that away.

Regular readers of the blog will know that the dim Essex Police invited me for a “voluntary” interview (in fact, entirely involuntary) in 2017, because Stephen Silverman, the malicious and self-styled “Head of Investigations and Enforcement” at the very small but (((well-funded))) pressure group, “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”], laid a complaint against me and also (as the police themselves told me) against about half a dozen other persons (all unknown to me) in respect of allegedly “antisemitic” tweets. At the time, Silverman lived in South Essex.

My account of that is here: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2017/07/13/when-i-was-a-victim-of-a-malicious-zionist-complaint/.

Well, that was in early January 2017. Here we are, almost 8 years later, and I no longer have a Twitter account (the Jewish lobby managed to have me expelled in 2018), but I am still publishing the blog almost daily. Several of those who have targeted me over the years have “shuffled off this mortal coil” already.

The stars in their courses fight on the side of the just” [Chinese proverb].

London. Zoo.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14105039/Moment-machete-attacker-rains-knife-blows-victim-Edgware-Road.html

[one of the usual “enrichers” of our formerly white European society, with his machete…]

Edgware Road underground station. The Bakerloo station, I think, rather than the nearby Circle and District Line one. I used both often at one time, decades ago.

London becomes more of a zoo, or a jungle swamp, with every day that passes.

Talking point

In fact, the picture is yet more stark. If you discount births to non-whites, the figures for almost all those countries would be lower. That is certainly the case regarding the UK, France, and Germany.

Scientific research seems to have established that the majority of people in Europe today, certainly the majority of real (i.e. white) Europeans, are descended from only 3 individuals in the Bronze Age, and most of those present-day people from only one man. I have featured that research a couple of times on the blog: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/01/26/the-tide-is-coming-in-reflections-on-the-possible-end-of-our-present-civilization-and-what-might-follow/.

It may be that a small group of people will have to lay the foundations for both a new society and, over time, a new race-formation. All others will fall by the wayside.

Late tweets

https://twitter.com/SprinterFamily/status/1859369238328435158

Starmer really is a stupid bastard, more stupid than I could have imagined, but in the end he is just a puppet of NWO/ZOG, just like Macron, in fact.

Late music

[Ural mountains]

Where Are The Limits Of Religious Freedom?

One of the pillars of a future “Threefold Social Order” society will be religious freedom. Such freedom is also said to be a pillar of our existing “Western” model of society.

“We” supposedly all agree with that ideal, meaning of course “we” white Northern Europeans. Of course, once one gets away from Northern Europe and its wider offshoots in North America, Australasia etc, that consensus ends. In the Middle East, much of Africa, South Asia etc, freedom of religion either does not exist, or exists only as a fragile plant.

In Europe, we see that the migration-invasion, and the societal takeover via a high birth rate of, in particular, Muslims, is threatening our fond belief that we have and always will have religious freedom. The pendulum is swinging. Whereas in the Middle Ages, Roman Catholic Christians repressed other religious communities and launched crusades to conquer Muslim lands (a simplification, of course, but let’s leave that aside), today the Muslims are invading Europe, not as armies (as happened several times in the past) but as migrant-invaders (immigrants, “refugees”, “asylum-seekers”, and as babies born in Europe…). If this continues unabated, we can expect to see more attempts to shut down religious freedom for non-Muslims, as shown in this cartoon:

CX9ZsZOWEAAky2e

This process can be seen in the UK. There have in fact been Muslims in the UK for a long time, at least in small numbers. An Islamic centre and cemetery was established on the edge of Woking, Surrey, in the 19thC (it can be seen just before trains enter Woking Station, on the Southern or lefthand side as the train travels from London). However, the political or societal strength has grown in more recent years, along with the numbers.

In the 1970s, the Muslim element rarely displayed itself politically. I myself recall that posters on the Underground in 1976 or 1977, advertizing the Libyan-funded film “Mohammed, Messenger of God” were often defaced, always with the same words: “Islam forbids representations”. That vandalism, along with “community” representation to the UK authorities and the film distributors, resulted in the film being renamed “The Message”.

Now, 40 or so years later, times have moved on. Despite the Muslim population of the UK only being between 5% and 6% (officially), there has been a gradual infiltration (I do not say that it has been particularly organized) into mainstream political parties, in areas where Muslim numbers are significant: parts of the North of England, the Midlands, smaller areas within London and elsewhere. The influence of Sharia law and courts has grown; the Church of England has shown itself craven (as indeed it is when confronted by the aggressive Jewish-Zionist element). In some cases, Christians wishing to display their faith, e.g. by wearing crosses etc, have been given the choice of not doing so or being dismissed.

I repeat, officially the Muslim population of the UK stands at little more than 5% (about 5.1%) so far, but a high birth rate may propel that to 10% in the short term and later to…who knows? What will then be its influence and power?

As to the Jews, in numbers they are small, somewhere between 250,000 to 280,000, though there are also very large numbers of part-Jews, many of whom have little or no day to day connection with Jewish religious practices. Their influence and power comes not from crude numbers, but from concentration in and control of key strategic areas: finance, law, politics, mainstream media and, now, large Internet organizations.

Christians and Muslims accept persons of any race into their communities, at least in principle. Both Christians and Muslims have traditionally accepted it as an article of faith that persons of other religions should be “converted”, whereas Jews do not seek converts (though some modern branches do accept small numbers, e.g. after marriage to Jews). Judaism, therefore, has never launched “crusades” or the like. The Jews do not aim to make the world Jewish, only to be the major influencing, controlling and profiting element in or over the world.

The modern Christian world of the post-Enlightenment has, in principle, accepted that people can be Christian, Muslim or Jew (or whatever else) freely. That is easy enough when it comes to beliefs, ideas, even public worship in particular buildings, though (as mentioned above) it took Europe a long time even to accept those aspects. Much of the world does not go that far.

Where things become more difficult is when the religious practice of a community contravenes the law or morality of the society as a whole. Halal slaughter, kosher slaughter, which revolt the sensibilities of thinking non-Muslims and non-Jews. Male and female genital mutilation by Muslims and Jews. The cries (now electrically amplified) of the muezzin from the minaret of the mosque. These are cases where, in my view, the demands of the society to prevent cruelty, the wish of Europeans not to hear constant mosque noise in their neighbourhood must prevail over the practices of both the Jews and the Muslims.

To take an extreme case: there were societies in the past, Aztecs, Incas, even Europeans of ancient Europe, who engaged in ritual sacrifice of humans. Would we accept such practices today just because “it is part of their religion”? I think not.

There have been problems in the recent past in relation to other religions: the Jehovah’s Witnesses, with their unwillingness to save the lives of their children via blood transfusion; the mental and sometimes physical cruelty to children of some small “Christian” sects such as the Plymouth Brethren; the contrived scam that is Scientology (the British government of the 1960s fought a long battle to suppress Scientology, because of its perceived cultic and controlling behaviour). There could be other examples given.

It might be said that even mainstream Christian religions have done very evil things, e.g. the sex scandals in the Roman Catholic Church, though those involved acts not sanctioned or encouraged by the religion as such.

In the end, society, meaning the political element, must draw the line between the zone where religion holds sway and the zone where group or community religious practice must give way before the general secular law which should protect people and animals.