Tag Archives: Stalinism

Diary Blog, 25 September 2024

Morning music

[John Augustus Knapp, The Rosicrucian Philosopher; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Augustus_Knapp]

Tweet seen

I happened to see the above tweet. Unusual to see a recent tweet apparently and directly quoting me from many years ago (certainly pre-2018, when I still had a Twitter account), and I have not previously seen that Twitter/X account, “German Historical Education”, or “@GermanScholarrr”, but I shall keep an eye open for it now that I am aware of it. The tweeter seems to be —from, inter alia, expressions used— American.

Worth looking at, anyway.

More tweets seen

Dr. Goebbels discussing the fragile peace in Europe, 1938 or 1939.

The Second World War was disastrous in many ways: including the destruction of the German Reich; the reinforcement of Stalinism not only in the Soviet Union but also across both Eastern and Central Europe; the huge human and animal cost in terms of death, injury, and other harm; the destruction of the very concept of “Central Europe” [“Mitteleuropa”] for nearly two generations; the collapse of the civilized European empires across Africa, Asia, and elsewhere; the huge environmental, wildlife and human cost of decolonization; the near-squeezing-out from Europe of European-centred ideology between American finance-capitalism and Marxist-Leninist Sovietism; the 1948 establishment of the state of Israel, and the consequent increase of Jewish wealth, influence and power in the world generally; the shrinking proportion of white Northern Europeans as against the general population of the world.

Today, we again stand on the brink of European and “world” war. If it were to happen, and whether it were to start in the Middle East or Eastern Europe, or even in the Far East, it would be more disastrous in its consequences even than were the previous two “world” wars.

Statesmen and political leaders of all existing states must pull back from the brink.

More tweets

As predicted on the blog as well.

Labour Friends of Israel Starmer/Reeves/Cooper etc will later launch their version of “stop the boats”, meaning set up “processing centres” in France which will rubberstamp 90% of intending migrant-invaders as “legal migrants”. The few not so “legalized” will continue to use the rubber-boat method of getting here anyway.

The migration-invasion is all part of a System plan, the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan:

“The Kalergi Plan, sometimes called the Coudenhove-Kalergi Conspiracy,[1] is a…far-rightantisemiticwhite genocide conspiracy theory.[2][3] The theory claims that Austrian-Japanese politician Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, creator of the Paneuropean Union, concocted a plot to mix and replace white Europeans with other races via immigration.

The…theory stems from a section of Kalergi’s 1925 book Praktischer Idealismus (“Practical Idealism”), in which he predicted that a mixed race of the future would arise: “The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes[a] will gradually disappear…

 …Coudenhove-Kalergi intended to influence Europe’s policies on immigration in order to create a “populace devoid of identity” which would then…be ruled by a Jewish elite.

[Wikipedia]

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalergi_Plan]

[Be aware that Jew-Zionist cabals such as the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”] often vandalize Wikipedia in respect of topics such as the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan].

As a matter of fact, the evil “elite” noted on Wikipedia consists largely of persons only part-Jewish, as seen in several recent UK Prime Ministers: David Cameron-Levita, “Boris” Johnson, Theresa May, and some not Jewish at all (though all pro-Jewish lobby and pro-Israel, as with Blair (some people think he in fact is part-Jewish, though), Brown, Liz Truss, Sunak, and now Starmer).

More music

Historical note

I have to admit that I must have missed that, at the time— I had never heard of it, or (as far as I can recall) the Hoffman Group.

Have just now seen a report, dated 17 February 1980, from the Washington Post.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1980/02/17/the-neo-nazi-group-that-went-too-far/8390e899-0c45-412b-8751-5bad6d074e40/.

More tweets

Constantin von Hoffmeister declares that the AfD’s triumph in Brandenburg signals the reawakening of a deeper European spirit, where the East rises as the final bastion of strength and tradition, standing defiantly against the crumbling decadence of a hollow, self-forgetting West.”

https://www.eurosiberia.net/p/the-nietzschean-rise-of-the-afd.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%BCndnis_Sahra_Wagenknecht

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_for_Germany.

Wilson v. Mendelsohn, Cantor and Newbon (deceased)…

Latest:

Time for the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority to take (another) look at egregiously dishonest and self-promoting (and now washed-up) solicitor, Mark Lewis, and his cohorts.

Lewis, previously prolific on Twitter/X (he even bought 70,000+ fake Twitter “followers” a decade ago) has now not tweeted for almost a month, not since he and his wife, Mandy Blumenthal (also a Jew-Zionist extremist) were caught out conspiring to invent a scandal, and also make money (by demanding compensation, a trick they pulled at least once before), by creating a fake “antisemitism” incident at the Edinburgh Fringe show of black American comedian Reginald D. Hunter, an incident then heavily publicized in the Press, notably by Daily Mail reporter Sabrina Miller, yet another Jew-Zionist activist.

More tweets

Poor Britain.

First, the “...second time as farce” poundshop Churchill, “Boris”-idiot, then Liz Truss, who only became an MP in the first place on her back; then Sunak, the little Indian money-juggler; and now a poundshop Stalin —the nasty, yet utterly farcical, Starmer.

Late tweets

Idiots such as Starmer and, a fortiori, Lammy just diminish Britain. Putin, the Chinese, and others, laugh at us because of them, because of their Lilliputian antics, as was also the case with “Conservative” idiots such as Cameron-Levita, William Hague, and Gavin Williamson, among others.

Williamson was a political Alan Partridge, of course. I say “was” despite Williamson still being an MP. His irrelevance is now unsurpassed. I wrote an assessment of him about 5 or so years ago: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/05/02/deadhead-mps-an-occasional-series-the-gavin-williamson-story/.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Williamson

Russia cannot lose this war and will not lose it.

Late music

Reports and Lies

We are accustomed to reading the most arrant nonsense about Adolf Hitler. According to this stream of black propaganda (which started as long ago as the 1920s), Hitler was savage, unforgiving, tyrannical, vituperative, uneducated, a down-and-out from the gutter, a house-painter, sexually perverse, an erotomaniac, impotent, excessively interested in women, a gay, mad, sometimes mad, occasionally mad, only interested in his own material benefit, a tax dodger, even harsh toward his beloved dog, Blondie!

In Hitler’s own lifetime, a pack of lies was spewed out by his enemies: Jewish elements and interests; the Communists and Socialists who, many of them, supported or condoned Stalinism; also journalists working, in effect, for those same groups. During the Second World War, both the Soviet Union and the Western Allies maintained huge ministries and agencies dedicated to “black propaganda”. After 1945 the baton was passed to the increasingly prevalent Jewish or Zionist lobby and its major offshoot, the “holocaust” industry, aided by historians who knew that their careers depended on not challenging the approved narrative.

The “Hitler was a house-painter” story seems to have come from a Jesuit priest who was taken to hear Hitler in Munich in or about 1920. He asked what Hitler was (at that time Hitler had few followers and was unknown outside the city); the answer came, “I think that he is a painter of houses” (no doubt a garbled version, heard somewhere, of Hitler’s pre-WW1 life as a struggling art student and painter). In the 1930s, Churchill took up that false version of Hitler’s life as a young man, no doubt calculating that English snobbery would be inherently biased against a political leader with a past involving painting houses or the like. Even today, one occasionally sees reference to Hitler “painting houses”.

The idea that Hitler was “mad” came from an anti-Hitler newspaper editor (probably the half-Jewish scribbler Konrad Heiden), who, in the 1930s, told the American correspondent and anti-Hitler propagandist William Shirer (who posed as an historian after 1945) that Hitler was a “Teppichfresser” (“carpet-chewer”), meaning prone to bouts of insanity when he would supposedly curl up in rage on the carpet and chew the edge of the same. A complete invention, which has coloured the popular view of Hitler ever since, though even the Jewish historians no longer make the exact allegation.

As to the stories and speculations about Hitler’s  sex life, I should imagine that every possibility has now been explored by journalists and historians eager to reduce Adolf Hitler to a sort of freak show. Needless to say, the most likely possibility (that Hitler was “normal” but unenthusiastic) is of little interest, being unlikely to sell books or newspapers.

A more recent allegation has been that Hitler was a drug addict. Again untrue, though there is at least a kernel of fact underpinning this one, in that Hitler’s doctor, Morell, was a medical innovator who did tend to experiment on his patients. Hitler demanded results; Morell tried to provide them:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodor_Morell#Substances_administered_to_Hitler

(actually, though many have quailed at Morell’s preparations, such as the ones that included “intestinal bacteria”, these were the basis for the now-popular “active” yoghurt health drinks for the stomach now found next to the milkshakes in every UK supermarket).

What about Hitler as a vengeful tyrant? This seems to rest mainly on his reaction to the 1944 plotters, who, in the midst of Germany’s fight for survival, saw fit to blow up Hitler and the German High Command at Rastenburg in East Prussia (now in Poland). Yes, they were executed, some cruelly, it seems, but would it have been much different in, say, England, had Churchill been blown up by “traitors” at Ditchley Park (in, perhaps, 1940), alongside his military and naval chiefs?

In reality, Hitler was not a vengeful type. Anton Drexler, the locksmith who founded the then DAP which Hitler joined in 1919, had a serious quarrel with Hitler in 1921. He wrote a letter accusing Hitler of “acting like a Jew, twisting every fact” (!), was removed as head of the party (replaced by Hitler) and was given a purely figurehead position until he resigned in 1924, after which he was elected to the Bavarian Parliament for another party, serving as elected member until 1928. Despite that, Drexler was readmitted to the NSDAP in 1933, honoured (though not given any political position) and died peacefully in 1942. One cannot imagine Stalin treating a similar case the same way!

Another example. The first reports about an attempted putsch in Munich in 1923 (the Beer Hall Putsch, also known as the Hitler-Ludendorff-Putsch), reached the ears of a police commander called Sigmund von Imhoff, who contacted the Reichswehr commander of the city and seized the telephone and telegraph exchange. He was probably the most important reason that the putsch failed (amid bloodshed, Hitler himself being injured as the main march was brought to a halt).

One can well imagine what Stalin, on attaining power, would have done with an officer such as von Imhoff, but under Hitler he was not punished. On the contrary, he was promoted to Police General in 1933 and, in WW2, seconded to the Luftwaffe with the rank of Major General (he died in Bavaria in 1967).

This article could be ten times or a hundred longer, so many lies about Hitler and the Reich have been told and continue to be told. However, the few examples above perhaps will give pause to those who imagine that they have been told the truth about those world-historic events of the 1920s, 1930s and 1940s.