Tag Archives: University of Edinburgh

Diary Blog, 14 September 2020

Twitter

Twitter is the home of the ignorant, very often. People are able to post nonsense, which is rarely challenged and often applauded. Look, for example, at the tweet below:

The first sentence is correct. Suella Braverman and Robert Buckland are indeed both barristers, and moreover, and despite their political elevation, remarkably thick ones. Now look at the second sentence.

The cited words are from published “Guidance” as to how the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority will exercize its regulatory functions. See https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/guidance/general-dishonesty/

The “Guidance” gives 8 examples, of which the words cited are part and only part of one: “helping other people to act improperly, such as by giving credibility to a dubious or suspicious investment scheme run by others.”

While the example might, arguing as advocatus diabolus, cover political matters such as in the instant case, it probably would not, particularly as International Law (Public International Law) is not always as fixed as many imagine it to be (I myself studied it as part of my law degree, in the mid-1980s).

Apart from that, and as noted, Suella Braverman and Robert Buckland are barristers, not solicitors. The Law Society (which the tweeter tags) regulates only solicitors, not barristers. Barristers are regulated by the Bar Standards Board. Also, barristers are not “struck off” but “disbarred”, as I myself was (for political reasons; see https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/09/the-slide-of-the-english-bar-and-uk-society-continues-and-accelerates/).

The Bar Code of Conduct does regulate barristers’ behaviour. Core Duties 3 and 4 provide that ”  You must act with honesty and integrity” [Core Duty 3] and “You must maintain your independence” [Core Duty 4]: https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/for-barristers/compliance-with-your-obligations/the-core-duties.html.

I suppose that those provisions might (but would probably not) apply to the behaviour of Suella Braverman and Robert Buckland.

Reverting to the tweet, you can see that the tweeter, one “@RussInCheshire” (why does it always seem to be people from Cheshire or nearby places such as Manchester?!) has that dangerous thing, “a little knowledge” (but not enough). He has tweeted something, with an air of authority, which is wrong in various ways. He has displayed ignorance but, importantly, few of his readers will know that he has tweeted bullshit!

“Russ in Cheshire” (whose Twitter profile is “Designer, coder, analyst, painter, wazzock. Centre-left, Remainer, work in progress and maker of mistakes. Working class Manc in Cheshire“) does at least admit that he is a “maker of mistakes“. My target is not “Russ in Cheshire” but Twitter itself. Not that the tweeter’s 103,000 (!) followers will be much misled. Most probably missed the tweet anyway.

What a waste of time Twitter is! I use tweets to illustrate my blog but most tweets are of little use and almost all are forgotten in minutes. Ephemeral. Political influence very limited.

Other tweets seen

This is the philosopher that the University of Edinburgh has “deplatformed” (in effect): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hume

As the long-deceased husband (ex-Guards and Royal Flying Corps) of an old friend of mine was wont to say, “one Jew can lead a thousand Englishmen by the nose“. He should have added “and two thousand Americans“.

Oh, yes…take away anything from public view that shows the inferior peoples as sometimes being or having been savage, and not as always having been innocent victims of white colonialism…

This government and its servants are an elected tyranny, elected only by manipulation, lies and sheer chance. Illegitimate government. When will determined people take it on?

Hitchens is not so clever here. Yes, UK banking and other jobs could be done and are being done from China and India, because “our” illegitimate tyrannical government is globalist, Zionist-infested, and finance-capitalist. Were the UK government (as it should be) social-nationalist, the above cartoon would not be true. British jobs for British people!

Roll on gale force winds, and then winter storms.

I have known numerous mixed-race persons. They all, to some extent, had psychological problems and, in most cases, problems around identity.

Below: typical Jew-Zionist attitude…

(((They))) care about their ethnostate, but not for our future. Actually, why should they? They are alien. It is up to us, up to the white Northern Europeans, to struggle for our future and for the future generations.

More tweets and news

Britain has given up any pretence of being a “free country”:

This is how a relatively free country becomes a police state. First, laws restricting so-called “hate speech”, which is quickly interpreted by the police (egged on by the Jewish element) to mean any political dissent of a nationalist character. Secondly, a contrived “emergency”. Third, laws passed on the nod, by a rubberstamp Parliament, and by manipulation of existing ambiguous statutes. Fourthly, repressive measures such as restrictions on assembly, travel, and mandates to enforce use of facemask muzzles. Fifthly, curfews (why?) etc, announced by thick drones such as Kit Malthouse.

The government and its servants have declared war on the British people.

Don’t have more than a few guests in your house, or the Jew will call in the toytown police and the poundland KGB…

No longer even a pretence that the UK is anything other than a “velvet glove” (so far) police state.

Looking beyond the encroaching police-state-ism, what will happen between now and the end of 2022, that most significant year? As far as the UK is concerned, it seems that unemployment will soon be in the several millions, that there will either be tax rises or heavy spending cuts, and that the people will be left desperate for a party to defend them in a situation where both “main parties” are basically Jew-Zionist and finance-capitalist fronts for globalism and the New World Order [NWO]. “ZOG”.

Sooner or later, the UK currency will collapse or depreciate significantly. Already we see the wealthy putting money into hedging assets: country estates, gold etc.

This is the calm before the storm. At the right time, a social-national movement can arise. I am not talking of, or not only of, System elections. It is possible that, despite the toytown police state, a movement might arise to sweep away what presently contaminates the UK.

Brief reverie

I am just amusing myself by looking at a few extant Twitter accounts which in fact are dormant because the individuals who used them, and who used to attack me and laugh at me being disbarred etc, are now dead (though not via my agency!). We may all go the same way in the end, but that does not entirely take away the pleasure…

Musical interlude

More tweets seen

They can destroy, but cannot create. Europe has imported millions of useless and/or hostile “elements”. No decent future can be built while they exist in Europe…

Anyone interesting has already been expelled from Twitter now, pretty much. The Jewish lobby conspired to have me removed in 2018. I know who was responsible. To each his own.

As noted previously, the absurd thing is that the once-“rebellious” parts of the population, meaning the “civil rights” “activists”, the “socialists”, etc, are now begging the State to take away their remaining freedoms, begging the State for stricter “lockdowns”, “social distancing”, wearing of facemask muzzles, curfews, fines, being ordered about by stupid little nobodies with clipboards etc, not to mention the Stasi-style informer culture being established by the most Jew-Zionist “government” Britain has ever had. “Socialism” died not with a bang but a whimper, and it whimpered “control us”…

Late tweets

To What Extent Can The UK Still Be Called “A Free Country”?

I noticed this tweet:

 

which relates to this [below]

https://supportnoahcarl.com/

Here we see the News Editor for The Guardian, no less, favouring censorship of views and even thoughts (so long as those censored are white…)

The Indian woman noted above, Priyamvada Gopal, is apparently an academic at Cambridge University. An out and out enemy of freedom (for white Northern Europeans). She does not want compromise, dialogue, let alone academic or civil freedom of thought and speech. She is an enemy.

In fact her Twitter timeline is a useful resource, where enemies of the British people expose themselves, in effect confessionally. As I have written in other contexts, Twitter is a good reservoir of open source intelligence about many of the enemies of Europe’s future.

Since I wrote the above (some weeks ago), Douglas Murray has written this:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7415169/Religion-political-ideals-replaced-dogma-turned-beliefs-hate-crimes.html

An interesting and valuable piece, though I have to say that I never saw Douglas Murray (very pro-Jew, pro-Zionist) standing up for my rights of belief or expression when a pack of Zionist Jews pressured the Bar Standards Board to have me disbarred a few years ago. See:

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/09/the-slide-of-the-english-bar-and-uk-society-continues-and-accelerates/

or when the same pack of Jews, more or less, also tried to have me charged by the police in 2017:

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/13/when-i-was-a-victim-of-a-malicious-zionist-complaint/

In fact, I have been writing on the same theme as Douglas Murray’s article for some time:

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/11/06/a-country-gone-mad/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/08/11/where-are-the-limits-of-religious-freedom/

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2018/05/30/one-mans-extremism-is-another-mans-struggle-for-liberty-and-justice/

There is more than one group trying to repress opinion (or even personal belief) in the UK at the moment. I have already mentioned the Jew-Zionists, and they are probably the most dangerous, because they have infiltrated over decades into the msm, as well as law, politics and, of course, business, as well as its offshoot, advertising. There are others travelling the same way, but the Zionists are driving most of this. The “antifa” idiots, the “multikulti” partisans, the Tooting Popular Front-style self-described “leftists”, post-Marxists etc are also involved, but on the lower levels, usually; they are far less effective because far less “connected”. “Useful idiots” for the Zionists.

I described in one of the links above how I was disbarred because the Jews wanted to punish me for my expressed views, views mainly expressed then on Twitter. In fact, I had ceased practice some 7-8 years previously, so “they” did not damage my professional and other life as they intended (which is no doubt why they then tried to manipulate tame Essex Police into doing their dirty work), but that is scarcely the point. The point is that (((they))) used (misused) the Bar’s Code of Conduct (now very much more restrictive than it was in the past, when professional standards were in fact far higher….) as a political bullying tactic.

The same thing has happened to a UK-based Palestinian activist, Nazim Ali:

https://www.cufi.org.uk/news/crown-prosecution-service-drops-charges-against-al-quds-day-march-leader/

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/campaign-against-antisemitism-launches-proceedings-against-the-cps-1.469174

https://5pillarsuk.com/2019/01/14/high-court-dismisses-case-to-prosecute-pro-palestine-campaigner-nazim-ali/

In short, the police and Crown Prosecution Service [CPS] declined to charge or prosecute Nazim Ali. The malicious Jew-Zionist “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [CAA] then launched a private prosecution, only for the CPS to take over that private prosecution and (as is their prerogative in law) discontinue it:

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/01/12/the-campaign-against-antisemitism-caa-takes-a-serious-hit/

When I was disbarred, Gideon Falter, the obsessed head of the CAA, crowed that people like Ian Millard, who had the temerity to criticize Jews, would “face devastating professional consequences”, which rather proved my point that that Bar Disciplinary Tribunal case was not really about me at all, but about trying to create a precedent which could be weaponized against others, not only at the Bar but elsewhere.

The CAA tried to do somewhat the same against Alison Chabloz, the satirical singer-songwriter, inasmuch as the CAA Jews, in her case, were trying to create a precedent in respect of “holocaust” “denial” (historical revision and revisionism). The CAA director, Falter, once studied law at Warwick University, but I have no idea whether he got a degree or not (and I have not seen it said anywhere that he has any professional legal qualifications).

Now we see that Nazim Ali is going to be “tried” by the professional regulators of the pharmacists’ profession. I wonder whether Zionists drafted the no doubt quite-recently-changed equivalent of their “code of conduct”? I wonder whether Zionists are employed in key posts?

https://antisemitism.uk/al-quds-day-leader-nazim-ali-who-blamed-zionists-for-grenfell-tower-tragedy-to-face-regulatory-investigation-following-complaint-by-caa/

The CAA pressured the relevant professional body. That is not some “conspiracy theory”; the CAA Zionists admit it [see link above] and in fact are proud of having done so!

The Zionists are far more dangerous enemies of freedom of expression than are odd UK-based Indian “academics”, however venomous they may be.

My view can be put simply, and is that there should be complete freedom to express, to adult citizens, one’s views on politics, society and history, as a minimum. However, such civilized freedoms have their enemies, and we must deal with them, before it is too late.

Notes

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/08/24/to-whom-do-we-turn/

A few relevant cartoons…

CZpdYWeW0AQXGc_

scan25

CxDUqlFWgAAY3LX

D635NrZW0AAGWQoC2YKf15WEAEfSBW

a0bl2RtB

Bso85QHCEAA1yun

CVkveUcWoAE0Hpx

Update, 11 September 2019

Here is a case which illustrates how far the UK has gone down the path of repression: someone imprisoned for 2.5 years for putting a few stickers on lamp-posts! That, in a country where violent thugs, abusers of the elderly, and other social evildoers are routinely given non-custodial sentences!

26 September 2019

Further thoughts

Germany is already treading such a path, and has been for many years. Laws against freedom of expression politically, socially, even historically (“holocaust” “denial” laws, laws against mentioning the many positive aspects of the [Third] Reich etc. Now such repression is intensifying.

https://www.thelocal.de/20190924/germany-to-create-300-jobs-to-fight-right-wing-extremism

https://variety.com/2019/film/news/german-regional-film-fund-boss-ousted-far-right-party-leader-1203348678/

Update, 28 September 2019

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/27/anti-racism-event-hosted-edinburgh-university-bans-white-people/

Here we see the approaching reality of “White Genocide”. It does not happen overnight. First, a few non-European immigrants, then more and more, all breeding fast. At the same time, freedom for British (or other European) people is eroded by “race relations”, “community relations”, “hate speech”, or “malicious communications” laws aimed in reality only at white people. The Jews are behind much of it, and they of course have their own agenda: to close down criticism or even plain disbelief in the “holocaust” fable and its fakery; also, to prevent opposition to Israel.

We see now (I saw 40+ years ago) where this leads: to a Britain where white people have no real political expression (just a shadow political life, ruled by Jewish influence); no freedom of expression even on legitimate political, social or historical questions; eventually, no right to exist at all.

Whites are not breeding; non-whites are. White Genocide. It’s real, it’s happening (gradually, but becoming ever-more apparent), and anyone sticking up for freedom (even in art or music) is repressed, even imprisoned. Look at the famous “banksters” mural,

BannedTowerHamletsMural

now painted over because said to be “anti-Semitic”. Look at Alison Chabloz, prosecuted and persecuted for singing satirical songs. Look at me (and others), disbarred for a few tweets critical of Zionist Jewry and the way the UK is fast-declining.

Action has to be taken if any decent future in Europe is to be saved.

Update, 29 September 2019

https://metro.co.uk/2019/09/28/man-who-displayed-huge-swastika-flag-on-home-will-face-no-further-action-10823515/?ito=article.amp.share.top.twitter

Good…but he should never have been harassed by the police in the first place.

Update, 14 October 2019

Below, radio loudmouth and ignoramus Julia Hartley-Brewer defends free speech. Strangely enough, she spoke not a word when I was disbarred at the instigation of a malicious pack of Jews, when Alison Chabloz was persecuted, prosecuted and convicted by connected pack of Jews, when Jez Turner was actually imprisoned by the same pack of Jews. I must be missing something. Or maybe not…

Julia Hartley-Brewer

@JuliaHB1

When does it all stop? People trying to get other people sacked by pretending to take offence at them expressing their perfectly reasonable and honestly held opinions. We all know where this ends… https://twitter.com/pinknews/status/1183300102062067712 

PinkNews

@PinkNews

Thousands call for Piers Morgan to be fired by Good Morning Britain for ‘dehumanising’ trans people https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2019/10/13/sack-piers-morgan-petition-itv-good-morning-britain-transgender/ 

Update, 15 October 2019

Below, what this politically-correct “offence” culture leads to: police (on the ground, the usual po-faced, politically-correct WPC…) threatening to investigate and arrest those who copy a definition out of the Oxford English Dictionary!

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/10/14/police-response-transphobic-stickers-branded-extraordinary/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/meet-academics-hunted-hounded-jobs-having-wrong-thoughts/

Update, 19 October 2019

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2019/10/19/police-predict-hate-crimes-twitter-first-time/

A comment about me, only seen by me on 24 October 2019

Strangely enough, “free speech” devotee James Delingpole seems unwilling to respond to someone’s tweet mentioning me. The Spectator and other places where he scribbles are all under Jew-Zionist influence or control, though, so it really is not so strange that his support for “free speech” has its limits…

(btw, Twitter account @ChequeShanghai seems well worth reading)

While browsing around the above, I happened to see the tweet below, in which the Jew scribbler Finkelstein (now, absurdly, elevated to the House of Lords!) makes a nuisance of himself to a young woman who retweeted me when I was still on Twitter (the Jews had me expelled in 2018). Another example of how (((they))) try to control free speech. The sad thing is that so many people fail to stand up to (((them))). I think that that will change, though…

Just seen…

Looks like the Shomrim (Jew private police operating out of a couple of real police stations in North London and even operating cars got up to look like real police cars and with their personnel dressed exactly like police —which is an offence, but a blind eye is turned—) may have had to find alternative accommodation…

https://barnetsociety.org.uk/component/k2/police-station-to-close

Update, 21 November 2019

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/11/20/right-offended-does-not-exist-judge-says-court-hears-police/

Update, 23 November 2019

https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/news/grimsby-news/police-offensive-useless-acaster-beswick-3482095

The police, CPS etc, but especially police, seem incapable of distinguishing, or unwilling to distinguish, between “grossly offensive” (unlawful) and merely “offensive” (lawful) and tend to treat all “offensive” communications as “grossly offensive”, which runs counter to Court of Appeal and Supreme Court case authority.

This is what happens when plainly bad law, such as Communications Act 2003, s.127, is drafted and passed into statute.

Update, 5 January 2021:

Re. the Nazim Ali case, the CAA conspirators had Nazim Ali brought before the disciplinary tribunal of the professional regulator of pharmacists. The result was that his comments were adjudged as “offensive” but not “antisemitic” (why not “antisemitic” but not offensive?!). He was then issued with a warning: https://www.pharmacyregulation.org/content/nazim-hussain; https://www.chemistanddruggist.co.uk/news/gphc-pharmacists-grossly-offensive-remarks-result-ftp-warning.

The full determination can be found here: https://www.pharmacyregulation.org/sites/default/files/determinations/ali_nazim_2041615_principal_hearing_05-11-2020.pdf

That was, of course, insufficient for the Jew-Zionists, who raged about being denied their pound of flesh. They wanted to have Nazim Ali deprived of his profession, trade, business, and home. https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/swc-and-caa-disappointed-zionism-slur-ruled-not-antisemitism-648435; https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/ethics-panel-clears-uk-pharmacist-blamed-zionists-for-london-fire-648292

I expect that their preference would be for Ali’s business and home to be demolished, as often happens in their beloved Israel (to which, however, few of “them” seem to want to relocate!).

The Jews’ next move was to get their (many) lawyers working on persuading the Professional Standards Authority to take the disciplinary part of the General Pharmaceutical Council itself to the High Court! See this jubilatory blog post by David Collier, a prominent Jew-Zionist activist for Israel who was one of only two “witnesses” against Nazim Ali: https://david-collier.com/jewish-community/

The aim is for the Nazim Ali case to be reheard and/or the “sentence” replaced by a far more severe one.

From the Jews’ point of view, the ideal outcome would be for Nazim Ali to be struck off the roll of pharmacists and also fined heavily. He would thus be deprived of profession, business and home. Almost as good as what would happen in “Israel” itself…