Morning music
Tweets seen
Fanatical Jew-Zionist extremist (ex-Daily Mail, now editor of the Jewish Chronicle) seems to believe that Britain should “defend” Israel! The sheer gall of “them”! Why should the UK “defend” Israel? This country would be better off were Israel to disappear into history.
The Daily Telegraph is just another mouthpiece or megaphone for Jewish Zionism.
The Palestine-resident (and other) Jews were committing acts of terrorism against British soldiers and civilians even when the Second World War was still ongoing, and later continued and intensified their terroristic activities, kidnapping and hanging British soldiers, blowing up the British HQ in Jerusalem, and attempting to poison the water supply in London, among other acts of terrorism and barbarity.
During the Falklands campaign of 1982, the Israeli state sold French Exocet missiles to Argentina, missiles which killed British soldiers and sailors.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exocet#Falklands_War
“Newly declassified files from the National Archives in Kew reveal that Israel supplied significant weaponry including strike aircraft to the Argentine Junta in the run-up to, and during, the 1982 conflict.”
[Falkland Islands Association]
Israel, both directly and via Jews with nominal British citizenship, and living in the UK, has suborned the two main System political parties of the UK, promoting Jewish and Israeli interests above those of real English/British people.
The above is no more than the tip of the iceberg.
In short, Israel is not an ally of the UK but its enemy, an enemy all the more dangerous for having a “fifth column” inside UK society.
Historical news reports:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sergeants_affair
More tweets seen
“Never complain, never explain” (in an ideal world, at least).
While I do not accept or agree with everything tweeted by David Morgan, his account is still one of the most worthy on political/social Twitter/X, and worth following by those with a Twitter/X account (I myself was expelled in 2018 after a long concerted campaign by a pack of malicious Jews, and I am disinclined to revive my Twitter/X account).
Even were that not the case, non-white immigration into Europe would still be wrong.
In the old Bar saying, “hard cases make bad laws“.
Civil servants should be neither seen (publicly) nor heard.
David Irving
For those who have not seen it, a 2-hour reminiscence by acclaimed historian David Irving:
Irving’s reminiscences are very interesting, not least on the scientific evidence establishing that the “gas chambers” of Auschwitz never were that; also about the selling to the world audience of the word “holocaust” as relating to the repression of Jewry in the years 1942-1944 (the word was rarely or never used in that connection until the early 1970s). Also, about how the supposed “gas chamber” at Auschwitz, visited with fake reverence by millions of (mostly American and Western European) tourists, was only built in 1948, 3 years after WW2 ended, and about how it is, in Irving’s words, “as genuine as the castle at Disneyland“… (there was belatedly placed a plaque on that Auschwitz building, stating that it is indeed a postwar “reconstruction”).
More tweets
Useless would-be dictator Yvette Cooper continues to drone on about “smashing the gangs” when the problem is not “the gangs”, as such, but the migration invasion itself, i.e. the migrant-invaders themselves. They are the ones who must be deterred or eliminated.
Yvette Cooper is a member of Labour Friends of Israel and has always favoured importing as many non-whites as possible.
That applies also to political leadership at all levels.
Salus populi suprema lex esto
[Cicero: “the welfare of the people is the supreme law“].
Interesting that the Israeli Jews hit the mosque first, or rather than anything else.
What the (Israeli) Jews are doing in Gaza is far more harsh than what happened in the Warsaw Ghetto in the early 1940s. The (Israeli) Jews are going to cut off all food and even water to Northern Gaza.
However, according to Jewish “human rights” lawyers in the UK, what is happening in Gaza is “not a genocide“…
Late tweets
The USA and the West generally are rowing back now on support for the Kiev regime. They are still funnelling money and arms to Zelensky’s cabal, but the aim is now not even to expel Russian forces from Eastern Ukraine and Crimea; the most that might be realistic is for the war to stop —or not stop— but on the present front-lines.
There never was, of course, any possibility that the shambolic Kiev-regime forces might seize and retain large areas of Russia, let alone advance on Moscow. That’s for the birds.
Russian forces are poised to advance, either in the winter, or next year, in the summer of 2025. In the meantime, the electrical supply infrastructure, and the transport infrastructure, of Ukraine will be further degraded. The whole of Eastern Ukraine might finally fall to Russia before very long.
The NWO/ZOG states of the West want to keep “Ukraine” (Kiev regime) fighting, but without any hope of military victory.
Few, if any, seem to be getting past the Israeli anti-rocket defences, but the aim may be to deplete the number of anti-missile missiles the Israelis have. I have no idea whether the Israelis have almost unlimited defensive rockets or not.
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
Jordan Peterson is a despicable person and a failure as a self-appointed “self-help guru”. He has suffered several nervous breakdowns. Here is an excellent article by Kevin MacDonald that exposes Peterson for what he is: a fraud and a lackey of the Jewish lobby.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/08/16/a-reply-to-jordan-peterson/
LikeLike
Buddy Brown – I Call BS on That
Buddy Brown is clearly fed up of immigration into the USA.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmJiu2vQ7HU&list=RDMMB7TXw5WLsq8&index=4
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fantastic song! The first line sums it up all “We have veterans on the streets, why do we need refugees?”
LikeLike
There is obviously a plan Claudius, otherwise how could this be happening in all white countries?
LikeLike
This should not have surprised me but it did. Another proof of how British politicians/traitors have sold out national sovereignty and dignity.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2328537/Just-6-British-army-uniforms-UK-75million-manufacturing-outsourced-abroad.html
LikeLike
Claudius:
Globalism…
That Daily Mail report is from 2013, btw; however, I doubt whether there has been any change since then.
LikeLike
If there was a change it must have been for the worse. I am sure Rishi must have helped his Indian pals giving them huge contracts…
LikeLike
Israel is no friend of Britain as your history proves. It was created by means of vicious anti-British terrorism which they have never apologised for (indeed they celebrate atrocities such as the bombing of the King David Hotel every year) and the Zionist state has a more recent record of anti-British actions such as those Exorcet missiles being sold to Argentina during the Falklands’ War and forging British passports when we had a Jewish Foreign Secretary, David Milliband, at the time.
Britain should only be a friend of Israel when they apologise for all of this and when they stop persecuting Palestinians, follow international law etc, stop acting like a typical bandit/criminal/outlaw/pariah state ect.
When people like Robert Jenrick wrap themselves in the Israeli flag it turns my stomach. Any normal British patriot wouldn’t do this knowing the Zionist state’s history towards this country.
In the distant past, no Tory leader or budding Tory leader would do that but now they do. This just goes to show how degenerate the so-called Conservative Party is and why they deserve to have an all-time low of 121 MPs in the House of Commons.
LikeLiked by 1 person
John:
Any persons (particularly educated, semi-educated, or prominent) supporting Israel and/or the Jewish lobby in the UK can be regarded as, in the broad or lay sense, a traitor.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed. We should keep our distance from the Zionist entity. If we dont and they continue to act as they do being perceived as being too close to them may encourage some people in the world to have terroristic inclinations against us.
LikeLike
Apparently, James Cleverly (Thickerly) is gaining support amongst the fake Conservative Party’s members in their farcical leadership election.
We know Tory members are, in the main, elderly people but surely not all of them have advanced cases of senile dementia?
It is clear that if they want the ‘Right-wing’ vote Jenrick is the best bet whereas if they want to pursue the Lib Dem leaning/centrist vote Tugendhat is their man.
Still, the party’s members gave us our first official clown as PM in Boris Johnson so they are obviously not that bright.
ALL of the remaining four are very flawed people and are not what the Tory Party needs. I would have thought more candidates would have come forward.
It is hard to believe that they once had leaders such as Stanley Baldwin and Margaret Thatcher.
LikeLike
John:
It must be clear even to Con Party members that Jenrick is a lying fake, who has no beliefs at all beyond his wish to do whatever wealthy Jews tell him.
I cannot see the bulk of the British people wanting any of the “gang of four” as Prime Minister. That is the ultimate point— the electoral choice for 2028 or 2029.
LikeLike
They are all duds and yes none of them will be PM. There should have been more candidates to contest the leadership and that does not mean useless idiots like Priti Patel.
Mind you, I suppose if there had been more contenders they would only have been of an immoral, libertarian globalist character. A real ‘traditional’ Tory like Sir John Hayes or someone like him should have stood.
LikeLike
That someone like Priti Patel stood to be leader indicates they are not a serious political party.
LikeLike
Who do you think they should choose? Who do you think think would be best for their electoral prospects and worst for them?
I am going for Jenrick for the former and Cleverly (Thickerly) for the latter. That being said all of them are deeply flawed.
LikeLike
John:
Out of that four, I am unwilling to choose. One black, one “half-caste” (as I would put it), one part-Jew, and one (maybe) echt-Englisch but married to a Jew (as is the black woman). I disagree with all four ideologically anyway.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Obviously they are all far from ideal from an ideological sense but you have to say which two would be best and worst electorally for the party.
LikeLike
John:
Do I? I do not think that I *do* have to do that, or anything else.
All right. Since you are a long-term blog reader…
As electoral assets purely, I would reluctantly say that, in descending order, I think that Tugendhat might appeal the most to the average voter: English (albeit in fact part-Jew), and looks British; military background (even if mostly Staff, or ceremonial, officer, though he worked in Intelligence and maybe even with special forces, unlikely though that may seem); Establishment background (father a High Court judge, and he himself educated at St.Paul’s and Cambridge).
The next most acceptable to the voters might be the rather thick Cleverly. He does not pretend to be an intellectual, but that might actually help him. Again, some military background, though not hugely impressive.
Third? Probably Jenrick. English or part-English (unknown). Says he is against the migration-invasion, which may help electorally.
Last, the would-be intellectual, Kemi Badenoch. Despite reasonable intelligence, her smugness and obvious disdain for the people would cost the Con Party dearly with the electorate, as would her Nigerian origins (after all, she has only lived here from age 16), and her marriage to a Jewish banker.
I do not know which two are likely to be put before the Con Party members.
Anyway, the above is my view.
LikeLike
Sorry about my rather sharp manner. Of course, I can’t order you to offer an opinion or do something you don’t wish to do on your blog.
I tend to think Jenrick would be best electorally-speaking but if he is wise he will quit this disturbing infatuation he has for the Zionist entity. Has he looked at opinion polls lately? Israel is NOT a popular country in Britain and never has been and that is especially the case since October 2023. As many as 70% of people have an unfavourable view of that state now. His corrupt ways and oiliness will grate with the electorate but he does appear to at least partially recognise the danger Reform UK poses to his party and that immigration is a serious issue.
Yes, Cleverly (Thickerly) may appeal in a ordinary person kind of way but he appears to have no vision or real policy agenda.
Tugendhat comes across as dull/managerial and could appeal to the more centrist/Lib Dem leaning Tories.
Kemi appears to be as mad as a box of frogs. She tends to emote and shoot off about a policy then think was that really sensible later? Her pet obsession (only real policy agenda ?) is ‘wokeness’ (whatever that is supposed to mean in practice) and transexuals. Immigration is a far bigger issue and more relevant to ordinary people. Yes, she does come across as quite smug/ full of herself and disdainful of people and their needs eg maternity pay. The electorate won’t like that.
LikeLike
I instantly switch off when I hear would be tryrants like Yvette Cooper say they are going to ‘smash the gangs’. That indicates their concern is about the gangmasters and the 99% fake ‘asylum seekers’ rather than where thrir concern SHOULD lay ie with the ever suffering British people who are having our one and only homeland invaded on a daily basis.
LikeLike