Morning music
Death and rebirth of a culture
The following short essay from the American online publication National Vanguard was sent to me by a reader of the blog:
“Stalingrad and the Death of the West
SOMETIMES A MOMENTOUS event occurs whose significance is not recognized at the time but only becomes apparent later. So it was with the surrender of the last German defenders of the Stalingrad pocket on Feb. 2, 1943. At the time, every observer understood that it was a fatal turning point in the Second World War — after Stalingrad, a German victory by the force of arms was impossible. All the Soviets and the Allies had to do was to ignore their casualties and grind through to the finish.
But in retrospect, we can see that the defeat at Stalingrad was more than just the defeat of Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany: It was the beginning of the end of Western civilization. The 82 years that have passed since then have revealed this. What we are experiencing now — and will continue to experience in the decades ahead — is merely the winding down of a civilization and culture that has lasted 1,000 years. Had Hitler prevailed in the War, he would have revitalized Western civilization and extended its life another two or three hundred years — perhaps even the thousand years that he himself predicted. But Hitler did not prevail, and so the fate of the West was sealed.
One of the first to recognize the true significance of Stalingrad was the French author Louis-Ferdinand Céline, who said:
It’s Stalingrad. How’s that for catharsis! The fall of Stalingrad is the finish of Europe. There was a cataclysm. The core of it all was Stalingrad. There you can say it was finished and well-finished, the White civilization.
We agree with Céline — up to a point. What was “well finished” was not White civilization as a racial phenomenon but only the Western incarnation of White culture.
Adolf Hitler noted in Mein Kampf:
Every defeat can become the father of a subsequent victory, every lost war the cause of a later resurgence, every hardship the fertilization of human energy; and from every oppression the forces for a new spiritual rebirth can come — as long as the blood is kept pure. (Vol. I, Ch. 11, p. 327 Manheim; p. 605 Dalton; S/ 359)
That the West is doomed is beyond question. Yet, as long as there are Aryans of pure blood in the Universe, our culture and civilization can continue. That is what we National Socialists fight for today: not to preserve the rotting corpse of Western civilization but for the new racial rebirth of Aryandom that shall follow it!“
“For further elucidation of the fundamental idea expressed in this short article, see:
- Faith of the Future by Matt Koehl https://theneworder.net/faith-of-the-future2.html
- The Revolutionary Nature of National Socialism by Matt Koehl https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/06/the-revolutionary-nature-of-national-socialism/
- Forward to a New Aryan Dawn by Martin Kerr https://theneworder.net/new-aryan-dawn.html“
[Martin Kerr, writing in National Vanguard https://nationalvanguard.org/2025/02/stalingrad-and-the-death-of-the-west/]
See also my own views, first published on the blog some 6 years ago, in early 2019:
Tweets seen
We in the UK need only about 1% of the existing white (English/British) population, and zero percent of the rest. I do not say, though, that the 99% or more must be removed or eliminated, simply that we do not actually need them.
Our animal friends…
Cruelty to animals: James Garnor, parish councillor, of Whittlebury, Northamptonshire
“A family cat in a quaint Northamptonshire village has been left traumatised after allegedly being targeted in a firework attack by a local parish councillor.
The shocking incident, captured on video, shows the cat being blasted after stepping into a birdhouse rigged with explosives.
The attack is believed to have been carried out by Councillor James Garnor, and is one of at least two such occurrences that took place in the village of Whittlebury.
It has been reported that Mr Garnor used remote-controlled devices to detonate explosives aimed at the animals.
Police were alerted in October 2023 when a local resident filed a complaint about the April 2023 attack.
While Garnor attended a voluntary interview and was shown footage of the April 9 incident, the authorities ultimately decided there was insufficient evidence to press criminal charges. Instead, he was addressed under anti-social behaviour legislation.
Nikki the owner of the attacked cat, Suki, has spoken about the disturbing effect the attack has had on the animal which suffered visible injuries such as singed whiskers.“
[Daily Mail]
Such behaviour is still not appropriately punished in this country.
More tweets seen
The individual and the collective— free speech
I happened to see that one of my earliest blog posts, written almost exactly 8 years ago in January 2017, and brief, had a couple of recent hits after all these years. Still worth reading, I think.
More tweets
In two minds about that. First of all, the farmers may be notionally anti-socialist, but that never stops them from accepting all the subsidies and other freebies they can get, and they are not only ungrateful for getting heavily subsidised in the first place but also constantly demand more.
On the other hand, the farmers are one of the last few bastions of Britishness. Few are black, brown, Jewish, Muslim etc.
The German people should, before all else, demand repeal of all “holocaust” “denial” laws (and similar repressive laws), which criminalize free expression, and inhibit examination of history.
Until that is done, untruth will continue to permeate German history and public life.
Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan…
“Offenes Feuer!“
South Africa should have killed off stupid Mandela and the rest of the “activists”, then fought to the bitter end if necessary.
They gave up, 30+ years ago, in return for “rainbow nation” bs…
They put their swimming pools and “way of life” before their right to rule…
God…another total idiot in a ministerial post.
This is her: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashley_Dalton. Both a lesbian and a member of Labour Friends of Israel. Can it get worse?
By that time (2032) the total non-white population in the UK will be (including those born here) about 40%, certainly not far off that level. By 2050, probably at least 50%.
What an incredible waste of money.
Take away Zelensky’s ricebowl. Cut off money, arms and ammunition to the Kiev regime. By all means continue with genuine person-to-person humanitarian aid to Ukrainian families, though.
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
That f… councillor responsible for the sadistic attack on the cat should be dealt with by the locals but I am sure nothing will happen to him. No wonder the country is in such a state…
As you can see if there is something that drives me mad is cruelty against animals. Believe me, if this would have happened in my neighbourhood and we knew the person responsible for it, he/she would have cursed the day was born.
LikeLike
Claudius:
It is a small village. I have no doubt that the locals know both the culprit and his address. As a matter of fact, I too know the address, though it has now been removed from Google results by, e.g., the local parish council, but I shall not be publishing it on the blog. Not for the culprit’s sake, but because it would be too boring to have to bat away (again) police people saying that I am “inciting” anything. Neither would I take justice into my own hands, at least not in this case.
LikeLike
Yes, I understand. Is a miracle that the adorable cat did not die or lost an eye! 🤬🤬🤬
LikeLike
Operation Cowboy and the 1945 Rescue of Europe’s Stolen Horses.
A fascinating snapshot of how one aspect of beauty and culture was preserved in the final days of WWII. The breeding stock of the Spanish Riding School of Vienna were taken across Europe and shipped to the USA after an agreement between the NSPAD and General Patton.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yVGonC2aLk
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Cruelty to animals: James Garnor, parish councillor, of Whittlebury, Northamptonshire”
I wonder which political party this scumbag is a member of. I did a quick google search but was unable to find out. It wouldn’t surprise me if this piece of filth is a Tory.
The modern greedy, self-centered, neoliberal Thatcherite Tories believe that caring and compassion are signs of weakness.
After all, their patron saint Margaret (protector of (((REDACTED))) pederasts) said that “there is no such thing as society.”
As the Traditional Britain Group put it: “The Iron Lady was aptly named, for her heart was both cold and hard, devoid of compassion and empathy, having no heartfelt connection to the people she was elected to represent, seeing herself and the rest of Britain as atomized individuals and families. For her, society does not exist.”
https://traditionalbritain.org/blog/collapse-idol/
In the above article, the TBG also correctly points out that Thatcher was a neoliberal, and certainly not a true traditional conservative in any way.
The same is true of most Republican “conservative” politicians in the USA. They are greedy globalist neoliberals who merely use the label “conservative” to win elections. They have ZERO racial loyalty. All they care about is enriching themselves.
Supposedly the Republican elites have a secret event each year (?) where they ritually burn a straw figure that represents “caring”, to show that they don’t care about anyone. The former Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has allegedly attended this event in the past.
The modern neoliberal Reaganite/Thatcherite “conservatives” throughout the west are repulsive: they worship (((money))).
Returning to the subject of the malicious Councillor James Garnor, he should be severely punished for cruelty to animals.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Friend of Britain:
I saw a Daily Mail reader’s comment to the effect that Councillor Cat-attacker is Labour, but that seems slightly unlikely, in that Whittlebury is apparently a rather affluent village.
LikeLike
Hello: Your analysis of Margaret Thatcher´s personality and the Conservative Party is spot on. Of course, the same thing applies to the so-called American “conservatives”, the gutless, rabildy pro-Jewish Republicans. Both parties had been throughly infested by the Jewish virus a long time ago but by the 1980s they could not be bothered with keeping up the appearances and embraced money-making and vulgar ostentation with a passion.
If I had to choose a film that depicts brilliantly the spirit of the 1980s and, therefore, the Reagan´s and Thatcher´s years , I would pick “Wall Street” (1987). Having been directed by a Jew (Oliver Stone) and written by a Jew (Stanley Weiser) the villain, Gordon Gekko (played by the Jew Michael Douglas) could not be but an Aryan. Interestingly, Gekko´s most famous line in the film: “Greed is good” was taken from a speech given in 1986 by the Jewish swindler Ivan Boesky to the students at the University of California. In fact, Gekko´s character is based on Ivan Boesky. Here is a link to the biography of that POS:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Boesky
LikeLike
Some more thoughts:
Yesterday during the Super Bowl (American football championship) in the USA, the “campaign against anti-semitism” ran TV ads featuring the rapper Snoop Dogg, which denounced “hate”.
The (((REDACTEDS))) have a lot of nerve, daring to accuse other people of “hate”, while (((they))) are enthusiastically and mercilessly genociding the Palestinians.
As the saying goes, “the (((REDACTEDS))) shriek in pain as they strike you.”
(((They))) are masters of projection, constantly accusing everyone else of the things that (((they))) are actually doing.
Everyone should remember: the Palestinians are the proverbial canary in the coal mine. The (((REDACTED))) goal is to turn the entire world into the Palestinians, so (((they))) can rule supreme over the entire earth, slaughtering anyone whenever (((they))) feel like it.
Everything the (((REDACTEDS))) are doing to the Palestinians, (((they))) lust to do to every other group on earth.
Indeed, this is already happening: the (((REDACTEDS))) are using the violent diversity as (((their))) proxies to harm White people, while simultaneously gaslighting and brainwashing White people to feel guilty for existing.
-With regard to the replacement of Andrew Gwynne as health minister, his resignation as health minister is not sufficient. Both the Tories and Labor have lots of form for letting scandal-plagued politicians resign from ministerial positions, and then lurk on the back benches for a couple of years until the scandal is forgotten, whereupon the scumbag MP is once again promoted to a ministerial role. Priti Patel comes to mind, but there are plenty of others. As long as they are still in parliament, they can simply wait until the scandal fades from public memory, and then return to the front benches.
Gwynne should be pressured into resigning from parliament, so at least the British people he hates can take solace that his political career is over, although he will undoubtedly move on to a lucrative (((corporate))) job.
Unfortunately, if Gwynne is actually forced by Starmer to take the Chiltern Hundreds, it will only be because of his “anti-semitic” and “racist” comments, and not his comment about hating British pensioners.
-With regard to the proposed transfer of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, maybe I am missing some context because I am an American, but the whole matter seems largely irrelevant to me.
I keep hearing the Tories beat their chests and bloviate about how they won’t let Starmer give away the Chagos Islands.
A few days ago, Robert Jenrick posted a video online, loudly denouncing “Starmer’s Chagos surrender deal.”
I suspect that the Tories are trying to gain support by pretending to be patriots.
Maybe their (ever declining) braindead members will be motivated by this histrionic chest-beating, but I doubt many other people will care.
The Empire is long gone, and the ownership of a few tiny islands in the Indian Ocean scarcely seems relevant when London is majority non-White and has a pakistani muslim mayor, over a million third world immigrants are flooding into Britain each year, and over a million little White British girls have been raped by muslims and africans.
The very survival and continued existence of the British race is at stake. THAT is what British patriots should be focusing on saving.
Who cares about a few insignificant islands in the middle of nowhere?
The Tories (and Farage) ranting about the Chagos Islands while their own homeland is being invaded, is the equivalent of worrying about your self-storage unit while your own home is being invaded and set on fire by a violent criminal gang.
British patriots shouldn’t let the Tories (or Reform) distract them from the issues that really matter.
The Tories and Reform are waving the Chagos issue around as a decoy to try to distract British patriots from the ongoing genocide of the British race.
“We won’t let Mauritius have the Chagos Islands! Rally behind us to keep the Chagos under British control!”, the Tories bleat, while their own party is run by a Nigerian immigrant, who replaced a hindu Indian.
If this was the 1800s, or even the 1950s when the Empire still existed, the hand-wringing over the Chagos Islands might be justified.
But today, with Britain being invaded by violent diversity and the British race being progressively erased from existence and (((brainwashed))) into self-hatred, the Chagos Islands are totally irrelevant.
The faux-patriotic chest beating seems to be largely coming from Tory neocons who fantasize about playing the “great game” on the global stage and declaring war on China or Russia.
The establishment politicians are waving the Chagos issue around, trying to distract British patriots from focusing on the issues that actually matter: namely White racial survival and the preservation of Britain as the exclusive homeland of the indigenous White British people. These are the issues that British patriots should be focusing on like a laser beam, NOT some irrelevant islands on the other side of the world.
The Empire is long gone. Maintaining the minuscule remnants should not be a priority, when the very survival of the British race is in grave danger.
As I said above, maybe I am missing some context because I am an American. But as far as I can see, the whole Chagos issue is an irrelevant and pointless distraction from the issues that actually matter.
-With regard to South Africa, I am pleasantly surprised to see Elon Musk taking a stand.
The Afrikaners/Boers never should have ended apartheid and relinquished power. That was a disastrous mistake, as was their foolish short-sighted decision to throw Rhodesia under the bus.
They should have executed the terrorist Mandela, and ruthlessly crushed the ANC and all other resistance groups.
The african population could have been transferred en masse to the bantustans, or even to neighboring countries such as Botswana or Mozambique.
The international community might have whined about it, but South Africa had a nuclear deterrent (and chemical and biological weapons too), so no military action would have been taken by the USA or the Soviets or anyone else.
South Africa is rich in natural resources and could have lasted indefinitely in isolation, despite international sanctions.
During the 1980s, there were South African troops fighting in Angola, so securing the Angolan oil fields would have been easy.
The Boers could have maintained the apartheid system and kept a high standard of living, in defiance of the international community.
And even if the standard of living declined due to sanctions, a Boer version of North Korea would have been preferable to african rule. South Africa under african rule is a violent, chaotic, and impoverished mess. This could have been avoided if the politicians hadn’t been cowards and traitors.
The fall of Boer-ruled South Africa is largely due to two factors, both of which involve subversion from within.
Firstly, the ruling National Party was too tolerant of opposition and subversion. They were too soft on the ANC, and they also were far too tolerant of subversive liberal elements among the White population.
These liberal elements were allowed to have political parties, circulate newspapers, and engage in various subversive activities designed to make the White South Africans feel guilty and undermine their will to maintain the apartheid system.
This subversive behavior by the White liberals should NOT have been tolerated. And of course, the White liberals were largely funded by the (((REDACTEDS))). What a surprise.
The second major factor in the collapse of the apartheid system was subversion within the ruling National Party itself.
Exactly what happened and why and how, remains shrouded in mystery and has never been adequately explained.
But essentially what happened is that the leaders within the National Party including cabinet ministers etc, betrayed their own Boer people and made the decision to dismantle the apartheid system.
It is unclear exactly why the National Party leaders became traitors.
Throughout the apartheid era, the National Party was heavily controlled and influenced by the Afrikaner Brotherhood (AB), a secret Afrikaner ethno-society:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrikaner_Broederbond
Throughout the apartheid era, the leading Afrikaner politicians, civil servants, senior military officers, etc were almost all members of the AB.
Indeed, it was the AB that was responsible for the rise of the National Party, the electoral victory of 1948, and the creation and implementation of the apartheid system.
The AB started out as a very Pro-White organization. Indeed, as mentioned above, it was the AB that oversaw the creation of the apartheid system.
But somehow, during the following 4 decades, the AB transitioned from a Pro-White Pro-Boer organization, into a subversive ANTI-White and ANTI-Boer organization, which sought to betray the Boer people and end apartheid and establish african rule.
The reasons for this dramatic 180 degree shift in ideology within the AB is still a mystery.
But for some inexplicable reason, by the early 1970s the AB was already turning against apartheid, and this trend accelerated greatly during the 1980s.
As the Wikipedia article points out, by the early 1970s the AB was already forcing pro-apartheid hardliners out of the organization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrikaner_Broederbond#The_Broederbond_and_apartheid
The strongly Pro-White leader Andreas Treurnicht was removed as leader of the AB and forced out of the AB in 1974.
As stated above, it is unclear exactly what happened within the AB that caused the dramatic 180 degree change in ideology and turned the AB from a Pro-White, pro-apartheid organization into an ANTI-White and ANTI-apartheid organization.
But whatever happened within the AB was decisive, and since the AB essentially controlled Boer society, this meant that the South African government and the ruling National Party was now controlled by an increasingly anti-apartheid AB.
The first major steps to dismantle apartheid occurred during the premiership of the arch-traitor PW Botha, who legalized interracial sex and marriage, and also legalized mixed-race neighborhoods.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P._W._Botha#Apartheid_government
Since the ultimate goal of apartheid was to preserve the purity of the Boer race and prevent the mixing of the races, PW Botha’s legalization of race-mixing was really the death blow to apartheid, although it continued to exist until the remnants of the apartheid system were erased by the arch-traitor FW De Klerk.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F._W._de_Klerk
The decisive factor in the destruction of White rule in South Africa was the change in policy of the AB secret organization, which essentially controlled and led the Boer society and the National Party.
Once the AB turned against apartheid, South Africa was ruled by traitors who began dismantling the apartheid system.
I am very curious as to what happened within the AB that turned this secret society from a Pro-White organization that created the apartheid system, into an anti-White organization which ended apartheid.
Perhaps we will never know exactly what happened within the AB that caused the organization to turn traitor. Maybe the business elites felt that international sanctions were limiting their wealth, and wanted to end the sanctions so they could do lucrative business deals in foreign countries.
Another mystery is why the South African security services and military allowed the leaders to betray the Boer people. This is perhaps partially explained by the fact that the senior ranks of the security forces and military were members of the AB, so they were on board with the treason.
But it’s a mystery why the middle and lower ranks didn’t neutralize PW Botha and deKlerk and the other traitors.
Indeed, when PW Botha abolished the much-feared intelligence service, the Bureau of State Security (BOSS) and replaced it with a neutered National Intelligence Service, the security officers and secret agents meekly obeyed and let PW Botha dismantle the sharp sword of apartheid.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bureau_of_State_Security
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Intelligence_Service_(South_Africa)
PW Botha fired the director of BOSS, Henrik van den Burgh. The AB also expelled van den Burgh.
Instead of doing anything, van den Burgh meekly retired to a chicken farm.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hendrik_van_den_Bergh_(police_official)
The paralysis and inaction of the security services and military in defending the apartheid system is very hard to understand. They basically stood by and allowed PW Botha and FW de Klerk to betray the Boer people.
At the end of apartheid, some of the Boers were discussing taking up arms to fight the treason, but they were manipulated and gaslighted into standing down and trusting the political process, by this traitor:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constand_Viljoen
A major way that De Klerk, Viljoen and the other traitor politicians deceived the Boers into taking no action was the creation of a “Volkstaat Council” which was created to study the issue of whether the Boers could have a small ethnostate within South Africa.
Of course, the entire purpose of the “Volkstaat Council” was to deceive the Boer people into believing that they could trust the political process, so they would allow the traitors to implement african rule. The “Volkstaat Council” was disbanded in 1999, and of course the Boers never got an ethno-state.
And that was that, the treason was complete, and White rule was over, and the genocide of the Boers by the african majority began.
LikeLike
Friend of Britain:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chagos_Archipelago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diego_Garcia
The strategic location of the Diego Garcia air base seems to be one consideration but the idea of not only giving the whole archipelago to Mauritius but also *paying* Mauritius so that the UK can, so to speak, rent it, seems perverse.
As you say, though, the British people gain nothing.
LikeLike