Afternoon music
Saturday quiz
Not a very good week. I merely equalled the modest score of political journalist John Rentoul— 4/10. I knew only the answers to questions 1, 2, 3, and 7.
I take issue with the quiz-setter on question 10. As far as I know, no European country has forest cover as high as 78%, though Finland has, I believe, about 74%, and Sweden the same or slightly less. John Rentoul claims to have answered that question correctly, though; well, there it is…
The continuing abuse of the UK legal system by the Jew-Zionist troublemakers known as the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” or “CAA”
I happened to see the following tweet put out by the malicious and troublemaking “Campaign Against Antisemitism” or “CAA”, whose chief spokesperson, “Slitherman”, despite having been exposed (by the carelessness of the CAA’s own lawyer, and in open court) some years ago as a serial and sadistic online troller of people, especially women, is often featured on the “no one watches” Talk TV online outlet, GB News, and even Sky News, as well as LBC radio, all msm outlets under the (((usual))) influence, of course:
[“A warrant has been issued for Reginald D. Hunter to attend court in relation to a private prosecution brought by CAA. Mr Hunter is charged with three offences under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, relating to posts on X that he allegedly published in September 2024. The first hearing took place today at Westminster Magistrates’ Court, but Mr Hunter failed to appear. A warrant has now been issued for him to attend court on a future date. This is one of a number of private prosecutions that CAA is bringing, and there will be more to say on the case in due course.”]
That seems (in view of the date mentioned) likely to relate to events in 2024 described in a few previous blog posts:
Much of the background can probably be found in those blog posts.
As regular readers of the blog will know, the malicious “CAA” troublemakers, liars, and perjurers (who are disowned even by most Jews, even by most Jew-Zionists, in this country), and (connected by supporters and /or members, though not formally) “UK Lawyers for Israel” [“UKLFI”], have been gunning for me over the past 11-14 years: see
The right of individuals and organizations to bring private prosecutions, once, in practice, mainly the preserve of bodies such as the RSPCA and RSPB, is now being abused, mainly by tendentious political organizations such as the fake charity, the “CAA”.
The “CAA” is basically a volunteer arm of the Israeli Embassy in London. It has been, for about a decade, conducting both harassment and “lawfare” against individuals and bodies it considers anti-Israel and/or “antisemitic”.
So far, apart from me —not privately-prosecuted, the “CAA” having somehow suborned police and Crown Prosecution Service [“CPS”] personnel in order to have me prosecuted by direct police/CPS action (see blog posts above)— the CAA has harassed such as the famous David Icke, the (half-Jewish) jazz musician Gilad Atzmon, former footballer and TV pundit Gary Lineker, Al Jazeera TV, the BBC and its reporters, and many others, and has in the past privately prosecuted the satirical singer, Alison Chabloz, whose case was then taken over officially by the CPS.
Private prosecutions can be taken over by the CPS either on its own initiative or upon application by either the private prosecutors or the defendant(s). The CPS can then either stop the prosecution, or take it over and continue it officially.
The “CAA” seems to have had plenty of money donated to it, either by wealthy Jews in the UK, or from Israel. Indeed, their latest “lawfare” abuse follows on from their long-running attempt to recruit a competent lawyer as “General Counsel” (they love important titles— “Slitherman” is called “Director of Investigations and Enforcement”…):
Other “CAA” staff members have also been recruited recently.
The “CAA” usually tries (as in my own free speech trial) to use/abuse the notorious “bad law” of Communications Act 2003, s.127, which was recommended for repeal by the Law Commission, but which (so far) remains on the statute book mainly because Jew-Zionist organizations (principally the “CAA”) made representations, via “friendly” MPs and corrupt members of the House of Lords, to the effect that the provision should not be repealed (during the quite recent passage of the Online Harms Act).
This type of “lawfare” should be prohibited. It is a flagrant abuse of the English legal system.
More
[Daily Mail]
Incidentally, the “two Israelis” mentioned in the report of the Daily Mail are the two dishonest Jew-Zionist fanatics mentioned in the blog posts above, in fact, that is “Mark Lewis Lawyer” and Mandy Blumenthal (his wife/carer), acting together with Daily Mail scribbler Sabrina Miller to create a contrived “incident”.
It is pretty clear why the abusive and malicious “CAA” cabal is now trying once more to bring private prosecutions. The police and CPS are now, more than heretofore, aware of the CAA’s “lawfare” abuse, and are less and less willing to take the contrived “CAA” complaints at face value. Ergo, with the CPS and even the fairly clueless police unwilling to be used as “CAA” puppets, the “CAA” has had to shift for itself.
Successful defendants to private prosecutions have the right to ask for the costs of their defence, which may be, in some cases, very substantial, by the way.
Tweets seen
That made me laugh. Liz Truss is ancient history, politically (in the real Britain outside John Rentoul’s Westminster Bubble). I doubt that many voters care about any similarity between Farage’s economic views and those of already-near-forgotten Liz Truss.
As for whether the (non-existent) “books” or statistics “add up”, the people have had so much of all that nonsense wash over them for 15-20 years that it makes little or no impact.
People want to stamp on both Labour and Conservative parties. They know in their hearts that those System parties have to go, whatever the flaws of Farage and his Reform UK party.
Just a Westminster Bubble club, which has as its main aim (together with personal careerism) amplifying the System message(s)…
It is not a pro-Farage vote, or even pro-Reform vote, as such, but neither is it a “protest vote”. It is a seriously-angry vote against the System parties, their smug freeloading politicians, and about everything now going very very wrong in this country, and against the key cause (of several connected causes)— mass immigration, the trashing of a white European country, and turning that country into a black/brown/Chinese/God-knows-what dystopian mess.
I suppose that the others are either non-Brits anyway, or too young (under 30? under 40? and brainwashed in the schools) to realize what Britain has lost, and what it has become.
Beria, Stalin, and the Soviet Union
Strange that some of the blog posts I consider among my best are also the least-read! Well, that’s “consumer choice”, I suppose. One such is this, written in 2018, and since then only hit on by a few people per month:
More tweets seen
Not sure what that tweeter (the ex-wife and ex-expenses-paid secretary of a Con Party MP who was voted out last year) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Syms] is saying there. That Neil Duncan-Jordan should have joined the equally spending-cut crazy Con Party? Stayed at home and cultivated his garden? Still, her final point is unarguable. Politically, Duncan-Jordan is indeed “toast”: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Duncan-Jordan. At least he seems honest.
Duncan-Jordan is MP for Poole, which was the lady’s ex-husband’s seat until he lost it by only 18 votes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Duncan-Jordan#Electoral_record.
What might happen in (?) 2029 at Poole is anyone’s guess. Maybe a Reform win, maybe not.
System politics must age people. That Labour MP is apparently about 13 years younger than me, yet (to be frank) looks 10+ years older.
Yet GB News is certainly “biased and tribal” in one way— the (((usual))) way…
I agree with that. I also think, however, that women should not box other women either. Socially inappropriate. Martial arts such as taekwando, karate etc? That is a bit different, in my view. Grey area.
The New Forest?! Ha ha! I almost used a laughing “emoji” for the first time. Co-incidence, I suppose…
Presumably the same people telling pollsters that they intend to vote Reform in future.
For me, Farage and Reform are only “on the way”, not the —or a— destination. I wish them well, though, in the short term.
The appeal judge in the Rowan Laxton case disbelieved Falter’s sworn testimony, but it could not be proven “beyond reasonable doubt” that Falter and another Jew “witness” for the prosecution at the first-instance trial were lying, so Falter was never prosecuted for perjury.
https://www.thejc.com/news/foreign-office-man-wins-appeal-against-race-abuse-claim-gyp2ql35
https://www.gov.uk/government/people/rowan-james-laxton–2
Starmer-stein sounds more like a Conservative Party prime minister or chancellor than a Labour one. Cringeworthy.
Late tweets
…or, indeed, my own “case” (see this blog, above). Toby Young, the “Free Speech Union”, Matt Goodwin, Katie Hopkins etc, all the “controlled opposition” dissidents, are effectively in the pocket of (((the usual suspects))). Which is why they are “allowed” to hold public events, fundraise, get money, get onto TV etc.
I missed that tweet from a few days ago. Jews brutalizing Palestinian Arabs in one of their new Jew-Zionist concentration camps in and about Gaza.
Not 100% accurate. I was not imprisoned after my free speech trial ended in conviction in November 2023 (sentence passed in March 2024). I was not even given a suspended sentence. I was given a financial penalty (fine and costs) amounting to about £740, and a “community order” of 15 “rehabilitation days” over 9 months, which in the end was finished (effectively though not officially) after about 5 months, and which basically consisted in my having about 6 or 7 chats (from 20 minutes to over 2 hours in duration, mostly about 30 minutes or so) with a rather charming and polite young lady from the Probation Service.
Something for the Israelis to worry about.
He’s a crazie.
From time to time, the British Army comes up with crazy mavericks of Kemp’s sort. Orde Wingate. “Mad Mitch” Mitchell. Others. They rarely get to the higher ranks, though Kemp (pro-Israel to the hilt— quelle surprise…) did make full colonel, “Mad Mitch” Mitchell reached half-colonel, and Wingate was made up to major-general during WW2 (though at one point demoted to major).
Wingate was a very pro-Jew officer, who shot Arab civilians out of hand in then-British-ruled Palestine, and tortured many as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orde_Wingate#Palestine_and_the_Special_Night_Squads.
See also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Mitchell
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orde_Wingate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Kemp
Should Ukraine ever be in possession of nuclear weapons, Russia would have no choice but to destroy them using its own nuclear weapons (as Israel seems to want to do to Iran). Colonel Kemp is mad to suggest such an idea (which, however, will never happen).
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
DRAMA
https://x.com/khnh80044/status/1923388673279529346
LikeLike
Dear Leader
https://x.com/ActivePatriotUK/status/1928833980524015892
LikeLike
I am intrigued by some of the questions from John Rentoul´s quiz. Here are my answers: 1) The White House, 2) Libya, 3) No idea
I’m not sure, but the answer to No. 10 must be either Sweden or Finland.
I shall wait for you to put me out of my misery… 😁😁
LikeLike
Claudius:
I had several possible answers to question 10, but either Finland or Sweden have a great deal more forest cover than they had a couple of years ago (about 74%) or the question is mistaken; I think the question was wrongly put, because all my internet searching today (well, 10 minutes’ worth), after I finished the quiz, suggests that no European country has such a high level of forest cover as 78%.
Yes, you are right as to questions 1 and 2.
I got question 3 basically right, enough I think to award myself the point:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peignoir
LikeLike
Thank you very much for the information. It is funny how, sometimes, certain words in languages that belong to the same family, in this case the Latin (Spanish, Italian, French, Portuguese and Romanian) that sound similar tend to mean the same. In the case of “peignoir”, that sounds very similar to “peinar” (In Spanish: to comb your hair), it led me to believe that it meant “peine” (comb), and I could not connect the action of combing your hair with a certain garment. As strange as it may seem, I was, in a way, correct, because in French, comb is “peigne”. Trust the French to confuse things! 😁😁😁
.
LikeLike
Claudius:
I imagine, subject to correction, that not very many women these days would wear such a thing. Not the younger ones, anyway.
LikeLike
Dominic Cummings is a “has-been” who was/is a “nobody” 😁😁
LikeLike
I read the biography of that madman and Jewish lobby´s doormat, called Richard Kemp. The only intelligent thing he ever said was that women should NOT be accepted into fighting units. Not only they do not have “the killer instinct” that most males have, but most importantly, they are not physically and mentally strong enough. The Americans tried to incorporate women into their fighting units, and it was a fiasco.
LikeLike