Morning music
Tweets seen
Amusing.
Axel Steier— Verrater.
Talking point
More music
More tweets
Hundreds of thousands of non-whites, mostly parasitic or criminal, and 90% or more of which are useless whichever way you look at it, are entering the UK every year. At the same time, a smaller but still considerable number of real English/British people are leaving. The “net migration” figure may be officially 171,000 (which is still enormous) but what it really means is that a couple of hundred thousand real Brits left, and half a million blacks, browns, Chinese etc flooded in.
Thoughts out of season
It may be that the salvation of our civilization lies not in its preservation, or its preservation as it is, but rather in its transformation into something totally different. A burial and then a resurrection or, to put it another way, a burial and then the germination of a seed of the future.
More tweets
That type of fake “libertarian” bs and money-worship needs to be stamped into the ground.
The reason that mass immigration is so important is that the migration issue impacts all other issues of importance: housing, taxation, education, pensions, crime, road congestion, crowded railways, and the NHS; even water shortages and energy security.
Well, import the pests, import also their ways of doing things.
[“The jewish Marks, Sieff and Sacher Families (Marks & Spencer Dynasty) were the primary architects of the economic and institutional pro-‘israel’ network in the UK.
After they ousted the son of English co-founder Thomas Spencer from the company, they used their wealth to fund ‘israel’s’ development and the IOF.
They were tightly interwoven through marriage: Israel Sieff and Harry Sacher married the sisters of Simon Marks—son of M&S co-founder and Polish immigrant Michael Marks—Rebecca and Miriam, respectively. Together, they formed the core of the ‘Manchester School of Zionism’ and:
- Acted as the primary handlers and aides to Chaim Weizmann, the Russian jew who went on to become ‘israel’s’ first president.
- Built the political machinery that lobbied the British War Cabinet, directly resulting in the 1917 Balfour Declaration.
- Created a London headquarters at Great Russell Street, noted by historians as the physical ‘heart of the UK’s pro-‘israel’ lobby’.
After the Nakba in 1948, they systematically worked to repair the diplomatic damage left by the jewish terror on Britain during the Palestine Mandate by leveraging the immense economic clout of Marks & Spencer.
Michael Sacher became the primary financial force behind the creation of early political briefing groups. He bankrolled the British ‘israel’ Public Affairs Committee (BIPAC), which directly laid the logistical and structural foundation for what would become the Conservative Friends of ‘israel’ (CFI) in 1974.
M&S built ‘israel’s’ modern textile and agricultural industries through exclusive massive supply contracts with ‘israeli’ firms like Delta Galil. This injected hundreds of millions of vital foreign currency effectively making the British high street a major financial pillar of early ‘israeli’ entity survival.
Former M&S corporate spokespersons have said ‘We have a history and a background with “israel” that we are very proud of’.
M&S executives direct personal connections to ‘israel’:
- Simon Marks (Lord Marks) was a close lifelong friend of Chaim Weizmann. During World War I, the British military officially detached Marks to direct Weizmann’s London headquarters, effectively allowing him to run early zionist political operations alongside his growing corporate empire.
- In 1948, ‘israel’s’ first Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, personally requested Lord Marcus Sieff (the future chairman of M&S) to help defend the new entity. Sieff temporarily joined the IOF, advising the ‘israeli’ Ministry of Defence on logistics, transportation, and supplies. He openly coordinated M&S goods and corporate finances to bolster the colony during its early aggressions on Palestinians and surrounding countries.
- In his 1990 book, Management: The Marks and Spencer Way, Sieff explicitly wrote that one of the fundamental corporate objectives of M&S was to ‘aid the economic development of “israel”.’
They used their wealth to build the settler colony and to influence British politicians to forget the massacres of the British troops and civilians by jewish terrorist groups and become pro-‘israel’.“]
Of course, that may not reflect the present position of Marks and Spencer. Blue chip companies of that sort are now often owned, beneficially, more by impersonal capital-blocs such as pension funds.
Dr. Aladwan’s crowdfunder: https://chuffed.org/project/dr-rahmeh-vs-the-lobby-and-the-state.
The RAF should not be “poking the Bear” at all, and certainly not in the Black Sea region, which has nothing at all to do with British interests. Let the brutal, shambolic, and corrupt Jew-Zionist regime in Ukraine fight its own war…if it can.
Late tweets
Forget the “left/right” stuff. Apart from that, though, I certainly agree.
More or less controlled by the Jewish lobby.
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
I am quite sure you published a video or news about “Shropshire Cat Rescue”. Well, here is a video that gives an excellent picture of the wonderful work they do.
LikeLike
Claudius:
Yes, I think I did. Thanks.
LikeLike
I have just watched a video that made my wife cry. The video clearly points out that the destruction of the small businesses and the communities was part of an evil plan (executed mainly by Margaret Thatcher). It was the triumph of unrestricted capitalism and corporate greed, things that Margaret “F…” Thatcher loved and promoted.
British High Streets Were Perfect… Until We Let This Happen
LikeLike
Claudius:
1960s, early 1970s. As the video says, there was movement a decade before Mrs. Thatcher, she just accelerated existing trends.
I recognize some of those high streets in the video, and some of the people, eg Shaw Taylor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaw_Taylor
LikeLike
With regard to the Hope Not Hate state-sponsored and organised attack mob, and their openly campaigning for the LFI stooge, Burnham, isn’t it ironic that the cretinous clown, Richard Tice, was asking ‘Hope Not Hate’ to approve and vet candidates wishing to stand for Reform. What an absolute clown show Reform is.
However, as you say, they’re the only instrument available with which to break the Tory / Labour duopoly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
HennyPenny:
That is it. Reform is the only game in town capable, on present showing, of breaking the “two/three main parties” scam, and is useful for that purpose but for no other.
As you will apprehend from my comments on the blog, I fully expect Reform to fail spectacularly if/when they are in government. The political and para-political field will then be wide open.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I couldn´t agree more with you about Richard Tice, what a despicable bastard he is! Another doormat of the Jewish lobby.
LikeLike
Carl Benjamin is a supporter of REFORM, which says almost everything about him. The fool described himself as “a classical Liberal”, in other words, a numbskull. He is one of the many hypocrites who pretend to be nationalists but, deep down, are Tories. The kind of people who support Farage.
BTW, what a funny way to spell “fare” he has…
LikeLike
Hi, Claudius.
I think that Carl Benjamin is supporting Rupert Lowe’s Restore Party. However, as has become evident since Rupert Lowe started to speak further in public, he is little different to Farage and Tice. He has also voiced his support for Israel.
Restore and Reform are both Thatcherite parties whose leaders think that we need just a little less immigration, and talk vaguely about deporting / repatriating illegal migrants.
By campaigning for Restore, all Carl Benjamin will achieve is the whittling away support for Reform (whom those lured away to Restore would have otherwise voted for).
In the upcoming by-election in Makerfield, all that may achieve is to allow Andrew Burnham, the would-be LFI Labour Party leader, to win.
LikeLike
Hello: You are right, Carl Benjamin is a supporter of RESTORE BRITAIN; however, I must say that my previous comment was based on erroneous information supplied by “AI”. I asked the same question today, and I got the right answer.
Anyway, I thought Rupert Lowe was OK, but I found that he is on record making pro-Jewish statments. I quote what I found today:
Defense of Israeli Athletes (2025): Lowe opposed the World Bowls Tour’s initial decision to exclude Israeli competitors from the World Indoor Bowls Championships. He intervened to ensure their participation, framing it as a stand against rising antisemitism.
Criticism of Pro-Palestinian Activism (2025): He suggested that Palestine Action activists who infiltrated a UK military base “should expect to be shot.” He also expressed frustration with MPs “opining about Palestine” instead of focusing on domestic issues, signalling a pro-Israel stance.
I think Lowe spotted a weakness in REFORM´s platform and exploited it by taking a very tough position on repatriation; however, I do not believe him. I think he is just an opportunist and deep down a Tory. Having said that, it is possible that the events may force him to change his tune and policies.
LikeLike
Dr Aldawan´s post about “Marks & Spencer” is priceless. God knows how many “British” companies with very British-sounding names are owned by (((them))).
LikeLike
Claudius:
True, but (as I noted) many others in the UK are effectively owned by large institutional investors such as pension funds.
LikeLike