Afternoon music
Stray thought
We are hearing much about the murder of the Polish or Anglo-Polish student, Henry Nowak, killed by a non-white in Southampton a while ago. In particular, people are arguing about what are the wishes of his family now.
It seems to me, not that those wishes (whatever they really are) are unimportant, but that this whole matter goes beyond those wishes (whatever they are) and, indeed, beyond the murder itself.
The matters to be considered revolve around the mass immigration (and subsequent/consequent breeding) of vast non-Brit, non-European populations within the UK, and the wider consequences of all that.
I cannot think of a really multiracial/multicultural society that has lasted long. People talk about the USA, but at the end of the First World War, the USA was about 90% European-origined, and the present very multiracial, if not very “multicultural”, USA of recent decades is already falling into near civil war.
The Roman Empire? Mostly European, of various strands, and it is important to note that the vast bulk of the populations within the Roman Empire did not travel far, or at all.
The main issue is that the UK’s present society is crumbling wherever you look.
I was also thinking about the present wave of arrests and trials of those protesting about the Nowak matter. It seems to me that, as with the not-dissimilar 2024 Southport protests, the System is using the whole arrest and trial process as a “punishment before the punishment”. To put it another way, “the process is the punishment”.
Those protesters arrested (whether pleading Guilty or Not Guilty) have all, I believe, been remanded in custody. There is no proper reason for such remand in any of the cases of which I have read: see Bail Act 1976, as amended. It is obviously being done as a means of repressing further protest by others. Purely political, or socio-political. Improper.
Tweets seen
…and, more importantly, arguably, are almost all just mouthpieces of the Jewish/Israel lobby…
The untermensch will be in prison for the next 21+ years, but a wall, a squad, and an end would be a better outcome; more just, and less expensive for the British people.
I generally disfavour capital punishment, but there may be exceptions. In any case, I distinguish between ordinary judicial punishment, and executive action designed to protect the people.
I myself have been bothered by Hampshire police drones repeatedly (also, once, Essex Police, in 2017, and once by the Metropolitan Police) over the past 14 years, always at the behest of Jewish-lobby “activists” and/or Jewish loonies connected with the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” liars and perjurers.
I do not know to what extent, if at all, the Hampshire Police and Crime Commissioner was involved (in recent years) in all that; I suspect, perhaps so. We shall see.
In any event, Police and Crime Commissioners are being phased out in 2028. She may even have to get a job (I think for the first time in her life, as far as I have read anyway): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donna_Jones_(British_politician).
See also:
In fact, such more or less peaceful demonstrations probably accomplish more than the kind of slightly violent confrontations we saw recently and, nearly two years ago, at Southport. There is no point using force when you are too weak to take that to a successful or victorious conclusion.
Britain needs no defence against Russia.
Russia is not the pre-1991 Soviet Union, has no world-conquering ideology such as the old Marxism-Leninism, and no motive to try to rule Central or Western Europe.
Moreover, we can see that Russia is struggling even to subdue the corrupt and shambolic Jew-Zionist regime in Kiev, and so far has not managed to occupy most of Eastern Ukraine, i.e. Ukraine east of the Dnieper.
Another point is that, were the UK to leave NATO and stop confronting and provoking Russia in the Baltic and the Black Sea, Russia would supply the UK at cost price with oil and gas, and also provide us with a large market for British goods and services.
Late tweets seen
Assuming that Labour wins at Makerfield (which is quite possible and even probable), it makes no difference in big-picture terms. The Overton window is moving; the fast rise of relatively more radical Restore Britain proves that. More and more people want something at least approaching a social-national world view. Reform UK, with its black/brown candidates and its pro-Jewish lobby, pro-Israel mindset, is getting left behind.
It may be that, for GE 2029 (or anyway the next GE), Reform and Restore could form a limited-time alliance —call it “Reform-Restore”— to avoid splitting the vote. Were they to do that, the prize could be…Government.
Both Reform and Restore will eventually either give way to social nationalism, or will morph into that to a large extent. Eventually, the will of the awakened people will break through and triumph.
Monkeys-on-sticks like that purport to rule over us…
All roads lead to Rome, but of course there is no “Parliamentary road” to political power in the present rigged system.
Late thought
Earlier, I saw some manic Ukrainian woman, apparently the head of the “Ukraine Forum” at the System “think-tank”, Chatham House (Royal Institute for International Affairs) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatham_House].
Said Ukrainian woman, as expected, spouted her piece about how “Ukraine” (the Kiev regime) was “winning” but —wait for it— needs more money, arms, ammunition etc.
One of the problems with the conflict in Ukraine is that the UK mass media is simply giving one side of both news and opinion. All the reporting is from Kiev or the Kiev-regime side, and the Kiev regime’s policy and propaganda is rarely if ever questioned.
Conversely, there is simply no real reportage at all from Russia, Kiev-regime attacks on civilian targets are not covered at all, or only very briefly, and there are never interviews with pro-Russian persons in Russia or anywhere else.
The elephant in the room is that Russia has maybe as many as 7,000 nuclear weapons of various types. Ukraine has none. The whole reporting of the war is akin to a kind of shadow-boxing. Russia has x-troops, the Kiev regime has x-troops; Russia has this or that, but the Kiev regime also has this or that.
You never hear anyone say that, were the order to be given, Kiev and all major Ukrainian cities could be holes in the ground within the hour.
Russia does not want to devastate Kiev and other cities. Why? Because of a thousand years of mutual history, because Russia and Ukraine were effectively one state for most of that time, because they are almost one people ethnically and culturally, and because Russia wants to rule a productive and healthy Eastern Ukraine, not a radioactive wasteland.
However, the way things are going, it may be that Russian leaders feel forced to escalate, if not to a nuclear level —yet— but at least to a more destructive conventional level.
Russia has hundreds of ballistic missiles in its conventional arsenal, and could launch, realistically, in any one day, maybe as many as 100 up-to-date ones, bearing in mind logistical bottlenecks etc; Russian forces already have, since 2022, used up to 70 missiles, including older models, in a night, but not concentrated on a single city or other target area.
Russia produces over 100 new ballistic missiles per month.
Were Russia likely to seriously look as if it might “lose” this war, part of its nuclear arsenal could be used, for example on Kiev. A terrible war crime, true, and it has not happened yet, despite 4 years of warfare, but it could happen, and don’t tell me that NATO —or the USA alone— would take on Russia in a nuclear exchange on behalf of the Kiev regime.
Were Russia to destroy Kiev and Kharkov, that would be terrible and/but also would be the end of the war. It might just happen. If it does happen, the main thing is not to let that slide into a general East-West nuclear war.
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
Seeing the video about that excellent film, “The Wild Geese” (1978), I remembered its awful sequel from 1985, “The Wild Geese 2”. The plot was ridiculous, to say the least, and the actors did not seem interested in the story, which was based on a plot, funded by an American billionaire, to liberate Rudolf Hess and had him interviewed worldwide on his TV network (???). As it was to be expected, the film failed miserably at the box office. I vaguely remember watching it and being very disappointed. Absolute rubbish.
LikeLike
Claudius:
I never saw that sequel. Sequels are often inferior to the first film; the Rambo series was like that. First Blood was very entertaining, but the sequels unwatchable:
LikeLike
Yes, I do agree. I vaguely remember “First Blood”, but it was excellent, by the way, the obnoxious sheriff who persecutes Rambo was played by a magnificent actor who deserved, at least, three Oscars but who was ignored by Hollywood. I am referring to Brian Dennehy. He usually starred in low-budget films made for TV. His career reached its apex between 1980 and 2000.
Brian Dennehy – Wikipedia
LikeLike
Basil The Great seems to be your typical Tory/Reform Party/ Tommy Talmud Ten Names Rubenstein supporting MORON.
Yes, muslims do cause a great deal of trouble in this country and make for undersirable immigrants but as we saw just this week undesirable immigrants can be Sikh Indians as well not to mention blacks drug dealing, mugging and stabbing all too frequently.
As for Jews, they do not often commit serious crimes but the Zionist Pro Israel fanatic ones are pests as well in their own way in that Zionist organisations like the so-called ‘Board of Deputies of British Jews’ helped to draw-up the anti free speech legislation of Public Order Acts such as the particularly notorious one of 1986 which was used by Thatcher’s government to shut-up and imprision the most passionate opponents of mass immigration when the problems associated with mass immigration first started in earnest to rear its ugly effects.
Then you get the Zionist fanatic of the present Chief Rabbi seeking to intervene in a general election campaign by making false allegations of ‘anti-semitism’ and virtually calling Jeremy Corbyn of being the second coming of Adolf Hitler when it is a FACT Corbyn is NOT ‘anti-semitic’ in anyway. This is NOT my opinion but the opinion of Rabbi Elhannan Beck of Stamford Hill’s Ultra-Orthadox community who regularly goes on the Pro Palestine demonstrations and who seems to me to be a very decent and humane person.
LikeLike
We should try and be friends with Russia. If we had done that in the 1930’s Chamberlain’s appeasement policy might well have been succesful in the end.
Russia is the largest geographical country in Europe, Moscow is the biggest capital and the country has 140 million inhabitants which is, by quite some way, the most in Europe thereby potentially being the biggest market for British goods and services.
After having made trade ties with the EU more harder to operate by our EU exit our firms need to find new markets . Russia can be a prime candidate for that especially as it is a fact of world economic history that countries tend to trade the most with countries that are nearer to them.
Do not the Foreign Office and Treasury have world maps in them? One wonders if they do!🙄🙄🙄
LikeLike
The only Jewish communal organisation there should be is the Union of Orthadox Hebrew Congregations. The Board of Deputies of Zionist Pro Israel Extremists should be shut down.
LikeLike
To my mind, the only even partially succesful multi-ethnic society is Singapore but even there it occasionally causes trouble. However, the two main facts that make Singapore at least a bit succesful in this way are that it is an extremely wealthy country with its people earning high incomes with little wealth inequality and the fact the Singaporean government is very authoritarian with restrictions on press freedom ext.
The country is not known as ‘Hang ’em High City’ for nothing!
LikeLike
What a photo.
https://x.com/BloodyPolitics/status/2063560916252168556?s=20
LikeLike
One reason Reform UK may fail in Makerfield is they are perceived as having far too many Tories in their ranks and not just any old Tories but people who seriously FAILED this country and native Britons the last time they were in office ie Jenrick, Suella and, worst of all, corrupt Nadhim Zahari.
You can make a plausible excuse to take on a few ex-Tories but they should be unknown backbenchers and councillors NOT utterly failed ex cabinet ministers.
In general though, the best policy is not to recruit Tories. Tories are poison to a successful political party. There is a reason the Lib Dems have not properly recovered from their ill-judged coaltion with the Conservative Party from 2010 to 2015. Tory mud sticks, I am afraid!
LikeLike
John:
I agree with that. In fact, the Reform “brand” started to lose its lustre when Farage and Tice were so happy to take in the very worst of the Con Party failures— Nadine Dorries, Zahawi, others. At the same time, they started to become more pro-Israel than many actual Jews! Mad.
Matt Goodwin also started to lose his political appeal around that time. His failure to win at Gorton and Denton badly damaged his own political rise; how badly, exactly, is as yet unclear.
LikeLike
Choosing the madly pro-Zionist Israel, Matt Goodwin, to contest a by-election in a seat with large numbers of muslims was mental. Yes, muslims were never going to vote for him but his presence on the ballot paper might well have increased the chances of muslim voters turning out at higher than normal rates. Muslims do generally-speaking vote in decent numbers whereas too many British people do not. That apathy is going to cost us control over this land.
LikeLike
That´s right. Goodwin´s pathetic performance at Gorton & Denton proved his incompetence as a political activist. I remember sending you a video that exposed his lame performance. Besides, the fellow is a cynical opportunist who, a few years ago, was writing papers about the “dangerous rise of the far-right”
LikeLike
Exactly, Claudius. A Grade A cynical opportunist is what he is along with Farage. Matt wrote a very nasty book about the BNP yet he now at least partially recognises the BNP were right about the severe immigration problems even then eg Nick Griffin nearly got sent to prison in this Marxist hellhole of a country for stating the truth about the muslim grooming gangs. Griffin got there well before Matt thought he could grift some money out of gulliable people on Substack to enrich himself, Tommy Ten Names Robinson could do so for obtaining the old Columbian Marching powder he imbibes so much and before Tory Boy Farage helped Boris Johnson ‘win’ an election and impose yet more immigrants on this country.🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Forgive me if I think Matt Goodwin is a cynical opportunist tosser. He is a very good fit for Reform Zilch in the UK and the utterly failed Tory grift band it represents.
LikeLiked by 1 person
John:
I think that you and others are quite right about Matt Goodwin, i.e. that he is making a career and plenty of money out of his “alt-right” Reform UK stance. TV presenting, TV appearances, paid msm articles, and a monetized Substack blog which may be bringing in anything up to £100,000 a month in subscriptions.
Having said that, I think that, at least to some extent, Goodwin has been on an ideological journey. I do not see him as totally dishonest in the “Jack Monroe” kind of way (if you recall that “Bootstrap Cook” fraudster and fake).
Of course, anyone who supports Israel and, especially, the UK Jewish lobby, is anathema to me, but Goodwin’s journey may not be at an end yet.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tice himself is a huge liability. Even by the usual lame Tory standards, the man is a thick cretin what with his loony conspiracy theories about Net Zero ect.
Imagine if he were a cabinet minister! God almighty! Do we really wish to see a repeat of a government filled with the same sort of chancers and morons who that despicable Metropolitan globalist, open borders supporting elitist tosser oaf, Boris Johnson, filled his ‘government’ up with?
A Reform Zilch in the UK ‘government’ would be an utter shambles and achieve nothing rather like The Oaf Johnson’s government did not.
Boris Johnson is evil. More people need to know that he deliberately torpedoed talks to end the Ukraine-Russia war early on thereby ensuring many more Russian and Ukrainian deaths and more expense for our tax payers.
LikeLiked by 1 person