Morning music
I was in Karlovy Vary in 1988, though for less than 24 hours and did not see that colonnade. Pity.
Morning thoughts
Looks as though billions of pounds are now going to be wasted on “defence”, and to be entirely spent on confronting Russia. Everything else, from pensions to social security, to rail and road improvements, to education, to the NHS and elder social care etc, is going to be sidelined so that the New World Order/Zionist Occupation Government (NWO/ZOG) can prod the Bear.
Russia has 6,000-7,000 nuclear weapons. Is that a country the UK should be provoking? I say no, and Russia in any case is not our enemy, unless the “British” government(s) make Russia our enemy.
In the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, even 1980s, there was justification for both the existence of NATO and for British defence against a real Soviet threat, however overplayed it often was, of an invasion of Western Europe by Warsaw Pact forces. That threat does not now exist.
We have seen how Russian forces have struggled over the past 4 years to subdue even the ramshackle armed forces of the Kiev-regime dictatorship. What in that leads those who pretend to lead the UK to conclude that Russia might invade any more of Eastern Europe, let alone Central or Western Europe? It’s mad.
Actually, why on Earth would Russia want to take over the gradually (steadily) crumbling British society, even were that possible? Russia has no need to rule Britain’s ever-more-crumbling cities, full of blacks and browns.
We are told that Russia may wish to re-absorb, in some form, the Baltic States or pribaltika, and maybe parts of present Moldavia. So? Actually, I doubt it anyway.
I have always supported the right of the Estonians, Latvians, and Lithuanians (and, indeed, Moldavians) to self-determination, especially culturally, also politically, but the only reason why Russia is now in Cold War-style opposition to those states is because they now belong to NATO, and persist in hostile actions against Russia, actions taken after “consultation” with NATO states (i.e. NWO/ZOG).
There are evil powers in the West pushing for war with Russia. The UK is a large part of that, as can be seen by the fact that huge donations (sometimes called “loans”, but non-repayable, in reality) have been made by the UK and EU to the Kiev regime, and that despite the crying needs of the British people, from whom necessary monies and services have been cut off, with more fake “austerity” to come.
The only real invasion of Britain (and Western/Central Europe) happening, or even likely to happen, is the migration invasion, a deliberate flooding of white Europe by blacks and browns. The “British” government is not only not stopping that, but actually facilitating it, by providing non-Europeans with free houses, money, services etc. It’s treason, in ordinary language.
The Soviet Union had an expansionist military doctrine, a supremacist ideology (Marxism-Leninism), and very powerful conventional military forces, as well as sometimes very effective intelligence agencies. None of those even apply to contemporary Russia.
My preferred policy would be for the UK to leave NATO (which outlived its usefulness by the mid-1990s), and to cultivate closer relations with Russia. We would get cheap or even cost-price oil and gas, as well as a huge market in Russia for British goods and services. We should also be able to redeploy the billions set to be wasted on armament to projects and services, and infrastructure, seriously needed here at home.
Let’s reset British-Russian relations.
Tweets seen
[“Starmer’s chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, set up astroturf groups to persuade advertisers to boycott the Canary website and so stifle close-to-the-bone criticisms of Starmer. The Canary has suffered financially ever since.
Now Lloyds Bank has inexplicably de-banked them.
Don’t expect the British establishment to play fair. It’s got a democracy to hollow out, a genocide to support, and a planet to pillage.”]
Nigel Farage was “de-banked” by Coutts, of course (though had it reversed, and collected compensation). Sam Melia, his wife Laura Towler, Mark Collett and others also suffered in the same way, via high street banks.
A kind of crypto-police state harassment of people, making their lives very difficult for socio-political reasons.
The banks are merely instruments. People, some in those banks, others elsewhere, made those decisions; individual people, and small groups. They should be sought out, identified, punished.
Morgan McSweeney I have already assessed on the blog (use the search box for more). Jewish lobby. Israel lobby. Labour Friends of Israel. Mandelson cabal. Epstein cabal.
Our animal friends.
[“When the Fukushima nuclear disaster forced thousands of people to flee in March 2011, they left with only what they could carry.
Homes were abandoned, farms were deserted, and countless animals were left behind. Many owners believed they would be back in a few days.
They never imagined they would be gone for months, or even forever.
For those animals, every passing day meant more hunger, more loneliness, and less hope.
But one man couldn’t walk away.
His name is Naoto Matsumura. After evacuating, he made the heartbreaking decision to return to the radioactive exclusion zone around the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.
While the world saw an empty, dangerous place, he saw thousands of innocent lives waiting for someone who might never come.
Every day, he fed abandoned dogs, cats, cattle, ostriches, and other animals that had no one left. Many had spent days searching for the families they had lost. Some ran to him for food.
Others simply stayed close, as if they finally felt safe again. With no electricity, limited supplies, and constant risk, Matsumura devoted his life to caring for creatures that the disaster had forgotten.
His selfless compassion earned him the nickname “The Guardian of Fukushima’s Animals,” but to the animals he rescued, he was something even greater.
He was hope.
In a place where so much had been lost, one man’s kindness reminded the world that even in the darkest moments, humanity can still shine through.
Faith in humanity restored.“]
Our animal friends.
See also:
Talking point
More tweets
Burnham already shows every sign of being a disaster even worse than has been Starmer-stein.
Not only the ghastly James Purnell, but even the horrible Alan Milburn are apparently advising Burnham now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Purnell
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Milburn
The human spirit.
Ian Robert Millard 
Good morning, Ian. Quite a cold morning here (5 degrees at 8.30 AM). If I remember correctly, yesterday the temperature in Paris reached 40 degrees. 🥵🥵🥵. For me, heat is the greater evil.
The British policy towards Russia has almost always been nasty and aggressive. Apart from the brief periods of friendship during the reign of Catherine the Great (1762-1796) and the Napoleonic Wars (1804-1814), British policy was always anti-Russian, but nothing compares to the present stupid and suicidal “poking of the bear” practised by the British media and the (((government))).
I think (and I hope) that the present “sabre rattling” of the pathetic alliance known as NATO is no more than that. Putin is not really a mortal enemy of the JWO (Jewish World Order). I wonder if all this is no more than a smoke screen to distract the Europeans from the growing migration-invasion.
LikeLike
Claudius:
Partly, probably. There is also the point that Russia is destined, though only after another 1,500 years, to take over the mantle of world leadership from (mainly, now) the Anglo-Americans. Attempts are therefore made to prevent that future from ever coming to birth, or to corrupt Russia to the extent that its future mission will be blunted.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A few days ago, I posted on a British nationalist channel on YouTube my opinion about Rupert Lowe´s pathetic attempt to distance himself from the so-called “hard-right/ethno-nationalists” within his party. I was abused in a big way, which proves how stupid/deluded many followers of R. Lowe are. Here is my comment:
The study of history and human nature teaches us that most people tend to excuse their leader´s faults because reality is too unpleasant. If I remember correctly, the saying goes like this: “People prefer beautiful lies to ugly truths”. One thing is to make vague political statements to mislead or confuse your enemies, and another, completely different, is to contradict or even deny the very principles on which your political movement is based. Rupert Lowe has done the latter TWICE in a couple of weeks. The man has proven himself unworthy of his position as leader of a supposedly radical nationalist movement.
A) “He (Charles the traitor) is certainly very keen to propagate a multicultural society, which I HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH, as long as people integrate”. The myth that unassimilable people who have NOTHING in common with European civilisation could or would assimilate is one of the greatest lies created by the system bent on destroying Western civilisation and its creator, the White race. Would you add garlic to a trifle? I don´t think so.
B) This one is even worse. In an interview given to a creature named Bret Weinstein, Rupert Lowe said: “I detest far-right, such as ethno-nationalists or neo-nazis…” (minute 15:00 of the interview available on YouTube (“Turning Britain Around”). Bret Weinstein belongs to the tribe that has been behind the destruction of Western civilisation since the late 19th century. Like many of his brothers, Bret Weinstein is posing as a defender of Western civilisation; only an imbecile would believe him. Again, Rupert Lowe showed his Tory/Liberal roots by repeating the same rubbish: “Everybody can be British/Ethno-nationalism is evil”. Like Farage, he has begun to turn towards the centre in a pathetic effort to look “respectable”. The best thing that could happen to Restore Britain would be a change in its leadership; otherwise, it will become another fake “nationalist” movement/party pretending to be “serious opposition”.
LikeLike
Claudius:
As you say.
I prefer Lowe to Farage; he at least wants to ban kosher/kashrut slaughter as well as halal-type slaughter, and Lowe seems to be more honest but, obviously, both are ideologically unsound, apart from anything else.
LikeLiked by 1 person