Please note that Alison’s Prisoner Number, which should form part of the address when writing to her or sending any gifts such as books, is slightly different to that previously given by some people, and is A6478EK.
What is the point in having laws for animal protection when a cruel and nasty individual such as the defendant in the above report gets let off so lightly?
Note: The correct prisoner number for Alison Chabloz is in fact slightly different: A6478EK.
Does anyone fully understand new rules on 'Track and Trace' aka surveillance on pretext of health and safety? Appears to me that pubs, when they reopen, will be under *stricter* regulations than before, requring registration of every individual (not just one in each party).
This professional complainant has ensured that every MSM platform in UK knows her name, Chabloz could only dream of such publicity. Something tells me this isn’t about hurt feelings …otherwise why allow CAA’s ‘BedlamJones’ a free rein to stalk women online for so many years?
Well done, BBC— only a full week late! The sentence was pronounced on the second and last day of Alison’s trial, which was 31 March 2021. Last Wednesday…
What a bunch of clowns (and monkeys on a stick) the BBC is! Defund the BBC!
Who but an 'evil racist' would object to such manifest justice? So keep paying your taxes, because things like this in the US invariably spread. Or, just quit the System that discriminates against people like us. Rear your own children, not other people's! pic.twitter.com/jmlSTBQ6Y2
Seems that, at least in Marin County (California…Marin County is the area the other side of the Golden Gate Bridge from San Francisco), “universal” means “universal…unless you are white (no matter how poor you may be)”…
“Universal”, like “diversity”, seems sometimes to mean the opposite of the proper meaning…
Still more craziness from Blood Services (this time in Scotland) over masks. Donors must wear them but 'be aware that for monitoring purposes, they will need to be removed for health check and while donating'. https://t.co/Q25oq9m9N9 So why no exemptions?
Masks are of little use in preventing infection (and, no, the masks people are forced to wear now in shops are not the same as those used in operating theatres where, in any case, they are just a conventional habit from the past as much as anything).
Until halfway through last year, the UK government agreed with what I have just written, but then decided to force the cowed and compliant masses into wearing masks. There is, as with the whole “Coronavirus” thing, an agenda behind it all, and one that has nothing much to do with health.
Blood service is *unique* in the whole NHS in refusing to permit exemptions from mask wearing. Yet donors are by definition healthy, and are on NHS premises only to help the sick, not to be treated for illness. So why? https://t.co/7aFu4V6iQ9 via @theconwom
Interesting from the historical-cultural point of view. The red part of that map coincides roughly with the Roman Empire, though not exactly (North African provinces are in green, as is the Dalmatian side of the Adriatic, and other areas (notably Asia Minor).
Again, the green areas are those which experienced greater penetration of Islamic ideas and customs from the 8thC onward. Again, though, not exactly; only in very broad brush terms.
BBC News – Alison Chabloz jailed for being 'offensive'…
As one man's wine is another man's poison… Who gets to decide what's offensive? And why?https://t.co/MjcBtLNGpz
— 🌴mick👀fulcher🏴 esq (@mickbognor) April 7, 2021
The above tweeter reflects what was normal British opinion until a couple of decades or so ago. Free speech etc. However, even at that time, and for decades before that, a certain (((tribe))) was worming its way into influence and power in the UK. Freedom of expression has been one of many casualties.
@clarkpaula. The great majority having accepted that they should live their future lives by government permission, will now learn in slow, intricate detail what that acceptance means. So, alas, will the rest of us. https://t.co/Kp945h3qvr
Because both Government and Opposition are pro-“The Great Reset” and “the Great Replacement”, both are riddled with agents of the Jewish lobby, both are pro-ZOG [Zionist Occupation Government], pro-NWO [New World Order] and in favour of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan, and therefore both following exactly the same agenda. Understand now??
Every day I try my best to report objectively but when the country is run by a bunch of slippery, self serving law breakers with absolutely no respect for the truth & no obvious comprehension of right & wrong it’s not always easy
BBC news now becoming a government mouthpiece for number of covid jabs given out. Ten minutes every night. Barely any coverage of protests and emphasis on pice injuries. Wonder if they are real this time unlike Bristol.#bbcnews
And this year hymns are still forbidden, most wear masks and proper Holy Communion is banned. Still far from satisfactory @alex_komnenos . https://t.co/oX6rcD1bsh
That, @guffynicola, depends on which icons are being clasted. Michael Wharton, writing as 'Peter Simple' in the Daily Telegraph of the early 1960s, was a hugely funny satirist of the emerging age of self-regarding liberalism. Colin Welch did a reasonable job of following him. https://t.co/s2yrUK3vZV
Not sure that I can agree with Hitchens. “Peter Simple”, whose stuff I occasionally saw in the early 1970s, always seemed to me to be a rather unfunny propagandist of a kind of faux-English suburban pseudo-reactionary mindset. Fake. At least, that was my occasional impression, a long time ago.
Gosh, @barbatosalv. Leaving aside the fact that the Christian 'explanation' of the origin of the universe is a parable, not a literal account, Einstein was not an atheist . Why not? Please read : https://t.co/XbQF3HtZYrhttps://t.co/a07Rb3u4qy
'We have made a religion out of politics, have ascribed to government power and state power things which ought to be ascribed elsewhere, and that we are now reaping the reward of that mistake.' https://t.co/2xNPVNmKys
There's now an effort to rewrite history on the Covid frenzy. The government does not want to admit that it once told the inconvenient truth (they're not much use) about masks: https://t.co/j2OyGYNOT7
There are plenty of examples of socio-political madness at present in the Western world, not least the near-worship of the blacks (as in the “BLM” nonsense), and in respect of “the virus”. The former is nonsense partly because much of our present world has been created over the past few thousand years, and especially the past 600 years, by white European people(s). The blacks were and are mere adjuncts, bystanders, spectators, sometimes nuisances and, yes (and as the “BLM” proponents themselves say) sometimes “victims”.
As to the latter of my two examples, i.e. “the virus”, in some respects that seems to be a deeper-embedded sort of madness, perhaps because based on a deeper emotion— fear.
The Coronavirus or Covid-19 virus has (supposedly) so far killed somewhere around 2 million people in the world. That is about one person in every 4,000 people. In the UK, the death toll per unit of population has been far higher (taking the statistics as given, though they are obviously faked or wrong to a great degree). In the UK, there have been well over 60,000 people who have died at least “with” Coronavirus. That is somewhere around one person in every 1,000 people in the UK.
Conclusion as to seriousness: serious but not existentially so.
Conclusion as to measures taken: absolutely mad. Society has been crippled, normal life largely put on hold, civil rights abrogated, and the UK economy facing a very serious hit. A cowed and frightened population have been walking around (even on solitary country walks etc!) in facemasks (despite such masks being of doubtful use), and every kind of busybody and self-appointed guardian of public behaviour given loose rein. That applies also to the police.
Meanwhile, millions of people are all but abandoned by the NHS because their ailments (including the most serious) are priotitized as secondary in importance to the supposed battle against “the virus”.
The public debate, such as there is, is futile, because a huge propaganda campaign has frightened the unthinking mass of the people into imagining that their lives are in danger from this virus, whereas for 999 out of 1,000 people that is simply not so. Reasoned arguments from such as Lord Sumption, the former Law Lord (Supreme Court justice), cut little ice, because emotion almost always trumps reason.
Oh, well. In the phrase of the day, which so well sums up the present apathy and complacency, which applies in almost everything now (apart from the “panicdemic”), “we are where we are”…
Alison Chabloz
On this Easter Sunday, let us not forget brave and persecuted satirist, singer and songwriter, Alison Chabloz, presently sitting in prison because a malicious Jew-Zionist cabal instigated a prosecution under the notoriously flawed Communications Act 2003, s.127.
It is to be hoped that Counsel for Alison Chabloz will soon be able to secure her release on bail pending appeal (to Crown Court) against an egregiously poor verdict and sentence by a magistrate. Unfortunately, that is unlikely to happen (if it does happen) before Tuesday [6 April 2021], at earliest.
Bored by 'University Challenge', I wrote my own quiz, with questions which are interesting even if you don't know the answers. Guaranteed free of African flags, Pacific island statelets, obscure mathematicians or quantum physics: https://t.co/mwMA4HCOs3
That last is interesting as a metaphor. The same view, pretty much, that John Buchan, or Zuleika Dobson, might have seen before the First World War, or that others might have seen between the wars. Oxford now is hugely different (not just in terms of buildings but socially too) from both 1911 and the 1930s world of Evelyn Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited, from that of C.S. Lewis, Tolkien and the Inklings, but that view remains essentially the same.
When I was a (rather belated) law student, in the 1980s, there was being discussed the question of whether barristers would continue to wear wigs and gowns. The wisest answer came from a lecturer who said that the Bar would cast aside everything except the wigs and gowns. The outward forms would remain.
In fact, while the above has proven to be mainly the case (in Crown Courts especially), in County Court the judge has discretion to dispense with the old form of dress, and in High Court and other fora (particularly in commercial cases) the old form of dress is often not in use now (neither is it in family law cases).
Nonetheless, most people do encounter the practising Bar in Crown Courts, and there the old forms remain in force. The substance of the Bar has, however, changed out of all recognition even since I was finally (having spent time in the USA) Called to the Bar in 1991.
Looking at the UK, the same is true in many other ways. Look at, for example, the Monarchy. It looks, at least largely, similar to what it was in, say 1956, the year of my birth. In reality, it has changed to something rather different. As I have blogged on previous occasions, whatever one may think of the Queen and Consort, no-one could mistake them or their lifestyle for that of “ordinary people”.
When you look at Charles, Anne, Andrew, Edward, there is less of the “royal”. You could just about (certainly in the case of the last three) imagine them living in some expensive part of suburbia, as part of (if the term now has any meaning) the rich “middle classes”, or indeed the “nouveaux riches”; or (as indeed is the case) living in Gloucestershire or Surrey, racing around in Range-Rovers, like characters in an “Aga saga”.
What about William and Kate, Harry and the Royal Mulatta? Notionally “royal” (in the case of William and Kate), but only in a “holding on by the fingertips” sense. Certainly there is nothing royal about Harry the “Royal Cuck” and Meghan the “Royal Mulatta” (who, not so many years ago, was actually married to someone else, a Jew businessman in Southern California!).
I do not want to be too hard on Harry. He obviously has emotional or mental problems, and was bagged by the Mulatta easier than the Duke of Edinburgh used to bag grouse, but he is basically now a peripheral nobody, albeit with plenty of money and still holding (so far) a couple of English titles.
William and Kate? At present still lined up to be King and Queen at some point, but I rather doubt that they will reach the finishing post.
We often spend time doing things such as trying to gain ordinary political traction, or defending ourselves against the onslaught of nonsense (malicious complaints to social media organizations, police etc) from the Jew-Zionist element and their “antifa” idiot-serfs, or commenting on the events of the day.
All of the above are of course necessary, but we should never forget that our primary focus should be the creation of a new and better society, together with the race and culture which should and must underpin that new society.
Society consists of people, and the most important thing of all is the production of sufficient numbers of white Northern European children, properly brought up and educated.
We, as white Northern Europeans, are facing existential peril. Call it “the Great Replacement” or simply “White Genocide”. Whatever. For example, in the world as a whole, only a few percent of people in this world are actually ethnically European, even broadly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_people (n.b.the most populous regions, i.e. those of Asia, especially China, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, which four states comprise nearly half the world population, are not covered in that article).
More directly, our own European societies have faced, in the past half century or so, unprecedented migration invasion. Since the fall of the socialist world (i.e. since 1989) and particularly since the disruptions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and the fall of Gaddafi in Libya, a gigantic wave of migration-invasion has hit Europe.
We have seen how the evil cabals of the international conspiracy have helped that invasion, and funnelled the invaders from Africa and Asia to Europe, even to the UK, Ireland, Scandinavia etc; even to Iceland!
We have our backs to the wall, but all is not lost. The world may soon face destruction on a scale that may dwarf even the terrible events of the Second World War. If (when) that happens, we as white Northern European social nationalists may be mere bystanders and/or victims, but after the corrupt old world is destroyed (in large measure) we shall have both the opportunity and the duty to create a new society out of the ruins of the old.
Tweets seen today
Flu rebranded as covid, to allow greedy psychopaths rebranded as philanthropists, to force Communism rebranded as the Great Reset, on the entire world.https://t.co/K4ZdSH49a3
That's kind @keithg811, and I do think one major task in the past 11 months was to reassure dissenters that they were not alone. But now we have to think of some way of securing a rigorous inquiry which will make a repeat unlikley. https://t.co/ao9OhsLRVf
Why would you be surprised about Wiliam Hague teaming up with the Blair Creature, @Francis_Hoar? Are you still beguiled by the Tory Delusion? '[They] looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.' https://t.co/yTuCX2Y7A0
'There is very little data that supports the claim that, at least until most people have been vaccinated, lockdowns are the only effective way of containing the spread of infection.' Alasdair Palmer in 'The Critic' https://t.co/znSmFZOt0u
Thank you @ink_spot_slot. Whenever I hear politicians talking about more 'bobbies' on the 'beat', I know he or she knows nothing. There have been neither any 'bobbies' nor any 'beat' for many decades. https://t.co/NSLR4dk4jB
I think this is rather good. Freddie Sayers on our willing acceptance of what would once have been rejected as servitude: How lockdown changed us @UnHerdhttps://t.co/GwZkLsZwZZ
Yes, that is pretty much the rule. The more that he talks of our freedom, the faster we head for the door. Another reason *not* to refer to him by the cuddly stage-name 'Boris' and use 'Johnson or 'Al', the name his family and close friends use @nannypicker. https://t.co/BKoRCZi4qb
It seems that, for the second year in a row, schools will mark the exams of their pupils, thus throwing away any rigour or credibility in the public examination system. For God’s sake, just check that the pupils are all breathing, then chuck them all “A” grades. They will love it, their parents will love it, the schools will love it and this shite “government” will love it. Sweeties for all! Meanwhile, in the real world…
Afternoon music
More music
More tweets
The smart city will sit at the base of Mount Fuji in Japan, about 62 miles from Tokyo. It is set to be built on the site of one of Toyota's former manufacturing plants called Higashi-Fuji. https://t.co/dTCK8vWXMy
A fleet of Toyota's self-driving electric vehicles, called e-Palettes, will be used for transportation, deliveries, and mobile retail throughout the city.https://t.co/oIe2rHsOOf
There are such exciting possibilities in the world now, gifted by human intelligence and technology. We must add to those positive aspects others, such as love for Nature, and human compassion. If the forces of Evil can be defeated, who knows where we may be led?
My basic medium-term strategy would be to concentrate as many British/European people of social-national tendency as possible in one region, probably the South West of England.
The concept in outline is clear, the Schwerpunkt or “concentration of forces” at a single point, or in this case a diffuse point, a whole geographic region.
Not everyone can relocate, but a goodly number can, and many would.
I am not going to go into details here, mainly because I have done so in my previous blogging on the subject, going back 4 years.
Social nationalism must exist everywhere in the UK, including the major urban areas which are increasingly occupied by alien populations; the point is that one must have both a “home area” or “base area” and also the (same) place or area where people and forces are concentrated.
The people and groups in the “occupied” areas can draw strength and succour from that base or home area.
We do not know what disasters will befall the UK in the short to medium-term future. War, civil war, economic collapse, even a real pandemic which will kill much of the population.
We must be ready to take action, and then take up the reins of power, if and when something truly large-scale happens.
A small group of harmless bike buffs harassed pointlessly by the UK toytown police. Typical of what this country has become. Note that, far from being ashamed, the police are so proud of their actions that they tweet about them…
That sort of nonsense detracts from the necessary and publicly-useful work that the police (including the traffic police or highway patrol) do.
Still waiting for this racist outrage and naked institutionalised anti-white racism to be condemned on the BBC…..https://t.co/ymDwHONoe1
Our society does not need this kind of millstone round its neck.
@Iromg please ask @cjsnowdon to acknowledge that the years 1942-2008 all had worse per capita death rates (age-standardised) than 2020. Also, over the last 30 years, 2020 only ranks 19th highest for England and Wales.https://t.co/icVdRie94t
Good point @justine_heaton. Metaphorially railroaded into metaphorical prison on false charges, the nation has given up protesting its innocence and is now prepared to undergo all kinds of humiliations in return for a parody of liberty. https://t.co/pu1nuFdQez
I keep trying to explain to people @paulembery that, whether you approve of them or not, such things are clear evidence that a major cultural, moral, social and political revolution has taken place in this country, and is still under way – supported, amusingly, by the Tory Party. https://t.co/jGeSg9gapZ
The UK msm (and so UK people) often think that the Roma Gypsies (with Romanian or other passports) are Romanian. Not so. They may have been born there, lived there, acquired passports there, but they are not Romanian.
The popular cultural milieu is where the purge must start. Having said that, take the above as a “many a true word spoken in jest” situation. That clip talks about the year 2050; in fact, the USA is already majority non-white, and the UK will, supposedly, be majority non-white by 2066. I think that it could in reality be as early as 2040 in the UK, with the continuing migration-invasion, and the far faster breed-rate of non-whites today, as well o the reluctance of white British people to breed, or to have more than one or two children.
We owe no loyalty to an alien-occupied state but only to our race and culture.
“‘If it turns out that we will be vaccinated with the AstraZeneca vaccine, we will go on strike,’ a nurse in a Flemish hospital told the Het Laatste Nieuws newspaper yesterday.”https://t.co/52g52py1nj
There are now 25 case studies of >250 acres covering a total of 224,830 acres on @RewildingB#RewildingNetwork pages. 16 from England and 9 from Scotland but as yet 0 from #Wales. Surely there are some out there somewhere? If so we'd love to hear from you.https://t.co/6pvWk9hak9
‘Wenceslas Square’ actually a very wide street, in 1939. Another of Karel Plicka’s beautiful black and white photographs of Prague before the modern age. pic.twitter.com/CLo5uuLIxL
That is quite similar today, or at least was, the last time I was there (1999). Less crowded in 1939, though.
More music
Late tweets
No doubt @dpjhodges is pleased with HMG's generous parole terms. Isn't 'no earlier than' a wonderfully flexible phrase? And aren't those four tests lovely and vague? Rejoice if you want. I'll do so 'no earlier than' I'm actually free again.
Oh, thank you! thank you! Oh bountiful Mr Johnson and generous Mr Hancock, for so kindly 'letting' us do some of the things we were once free to do, eventually, and provided various vague 'tests' are met . Yeah. https://t.co/Po3L4RuSkt
I happened to see the tweet below by Nick Griffin:
I had a long discussion with Jayda and others a couple of days ago. She's head & shoulders above anyone else on the UK scene. Some exciting plans shaping up.#Resistancehttps://t.co/PkdiV7nASc
I hate to criticize any British nationalists unless they are obviously either controlled opposition or completely degenerate, but what on Earth is Griffin talking about?!
I have never met Jayda Fransen, and have never had any contact with her, but if Griffin is correct that she is “head and shoulders above anyone else on the UK scene“, then I despair…
I am just watching the video in that tweet. Based on that video, Jayda Fransen is no less articulate than many System party MPs, but that is, frankly, not saying much.
I looked up Jayda Fransen on Wikipedia, but the entry about her is not very enlightening: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jayda_Fransen. Wikipedia is (((infested))) and that comes out in its more “political” articles.
Jayda Fransen’s Wikipedia entry contains little about her as a person. No date or place of birth, no educational details, no family details.
I have now attempted to discover a few facts about her. If any readers have any further or better information, preferably verifiable, to add to what I have discovered, it can be left in the Comments section below.
It seems that Jayda Fransen was born in 1986, making her about 34.
In the video which I am now watching, Jayda Fransen refers to a time when she “practised law for many years“, presumably as a solicitor. Certainly I (who was a practising barrister) have never heard of any Jayda Fransen who was a barrister. I have just looked at the Bar Registry: no trace.
There is no trace of Jayda Fransen as a solicitor either, whether on the present roll of solicitors or on the record of struck-off former solicitors (see: Solicitors’ Regulation Authority website).
I did see this, https://www.allinlondon.co.uk/directory/solicitors/67054-martin-wilkinson, which indicates that at some point many years ago, Jayda Fransen was working for a “one-man band” solicitor, based in Forest Hill, South London and/or at Thamesmead in South East London. At that time she was apparently doing a correspondence course for a degree in law (LLB).
It is unarguable that merely working in a solicitor’s office is not “practising law” in normal English usage.
That Martin Wilkinson solicitor’s office is now, it seems, closed.
Conclusion: Jayda Fransen is not and never was a solicitor or barrister. Indeed, it is an open question whether she even has a law degree.
Jayda Fransen herself has only stood for election once, at the 2014 Rochester and Strood by-election, where she represented the Britain First party.
At the Rochester and Strood by-election, Jayda Fransen/Britain First came 9th out of 13 candidates. She received 56 votes out of 40,065. In percentage terms, very roughly 0.1% or slightly more. About 1 vote out of every 765; by any standard, a pathetic result. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Rochester_and_Strood_by-election#Result
Jayda Fransen’s new party is online https://www.britishfreedomparty.com/news but as far as I have been able to discover is as yet unregistered with the Electoral Commission.
I have not been very impressed by the Jayda Fransen video which I have just seen. Muslims mentioned but no mention at all of the Jew-Zionist influence in the msm, or in politics, legal system, finance etc.
There was no attempt in the video to address the serious problems facing the UK and Europe, whether the problems are economic, racial, or cultural.
I could also do without the references to “Lefties”. That is Daily Mail or Sun-speak from the 1980s, and says nothing, really. I myself never use such meaningless terms as “Right”, “Left” etc. As for the frequent use of “Marxist”, that will convey little to most people, certainly to the bulk of the people.
Trump: why support that idiot? He is a parrot in a gilded cage, guarded by a troop of Jews. Even his son-in-law is a Jew!
She seems to have tattoos on her arms.
Jayda Fransen seems to be a pleasant enough person, not completely unintelligent either. I could agree with some of what she said in her video. However, speaking politically, she is a non-starter in my view, though I am not “opposed” to her as such, and at least she seems to have the energy to get out and do things, which itself distinguishes her.
I have read the “manifesto” of the new party; again, I can agree with much of it.
This is not the new movement that Britain needs.
[Update, same day: I have been sent the video below since I published the above assessment of Jayda Fransen:
Jayda Fransen when she was a leading member of the Britain First party, in Golders Green (North London) with Paul Golding, who is still its leader and, as I understand, Ms. Fransen’s ex-boyfriend.
Spouting nonsense about how wonderful the Jews are…
Absolutely naive, ridiculous and stupid. To choose between Islamists and the Jewish lobby is a false choice, for one thing. Apart from that, Ms. Fransen either is unaware of the effects of the negative influence of the Jew-Zionist element on race and culture in the UK, in Europe, in the world, or thinks it acceptable.
I was willing to be favourable, in principle, to this new British Freedom Party, or at least even-handed, but I have seen and heard enough now. In the formula of Dragons’ Den, “I’m out“!
What on Earth is Nick Griffin playing at?]
[Update, 14 October 2021: since the above was written, Jayda Fransen stood as candidate at the July 2021 by-election at Batley and Spen. The result was that Labour just held on against the Conservative Party, with George Galloway coming in a fairly strong third. As for Jayda Fransen, she came in 15th out of 16 candidates. Her 50 votes (out of 37,695) represented 0.13% of turnout. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Batley_and_Spen_by-election#Result. Point proven, I think…].
[Update, 16 February 2023: in the past year or so, Jayda Fransen has stood for election twice more (as Independent), at Southend West and at Wakefield. In the latter she scored 0.1% of the votes cast, meaning that 23 voters voted for her. At Southend, she did better, scoring 2% (229 votes) but the Labour, LibDem and even Reform UK parties did not stand: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jayda_Fransen#Westminster_by-elections
Is the ‘centre’ beginning to grasp that the National Panic Strategy is a vast disproportionate mistake? @iainmartin1, anxiously reassuring us that he is not a ‘libertarian’ or a ‘Covid denier’, manages to squeeze some sense into a paper that has until now been Johnson’s ‘Pravda’. https://t.co/jQ2cBuopr1
The UK Govt is broken. @Conservatives MP going crazy on WhatsApp groups, Emails ex… over @BorisJohnson & Dominic Cummings dictating laws & breaking treaties. They wanted Boris because they knew how he would behave, they didn't expect it aimed at them though.
I have seen nothing about Katie Hopkins in the msm since she was expelled from Twitter, though she is still on YouTube and Facebook. At present she herself is in the USA.
As I have blogged previously, the “alt-Right” put all its lucrative eggs in one basket— social media. Take that away (at the clamour of “antifa” idiots and the Jews behind them) and they have nothing on which to fall back; no political parties, no street armies, no armed cadres. Without social media, they just fade away.
Look at “Prison Planet” Watson. His quite popular rants against the migration invasion, the “virus” fear propaganda etc, are fine as far as they go, but (like Ms. Hopkins) he puts forward no political programme. A megaphone with little behind it. Also like Ms. Hopkins, he never defended —as far as I have seen— those who have actually been suffering for years in the cause of free speech in the UK, meaning, inter alia, me, Alison Chabloz, Jez Turner etc.
Both Katie Hopkins and Paul Joseph Watson make a big song and dance about being pro-Jew and pro-Israel. That puts them in the “useless” category as far as I am concerned. You can add Breitbart, “Milo”, “Sargon of Akkad”, Tommy Robinson and many others to the same list, then chuck it in the bin.
Again, I sympathize with the statement, but for me the earlier building is almost as unaesthetic as the newer one (which Prince Charles criticized when it was in the planning stage).
Yes , it's everywhere @leoniedelt I am currently in the midst of a complaint to the Advertising Standards Authority about this advertisement. The pictured person has no experimental basis for her suppsoed claim that her wearing of a mask protects anyone else. https://t.co/zcDfNM15Iz
The poster shown above is symptomatic of the “new Britain” which is not worth defending but eminently worth replacing: a mixed-race woman, of child-bearing age, wearing a mask-muzzle, and both propagandizing and socially-intimidating the public, all under the “caring-sharing” NHS banner…
Nor do I claim to be such @jeffvahue. But why don't you also observe that you don't see 'virologist' in the bios of Alexander 'Boris' Johnson or Matt Hancock. Prof Ferguson is a physicist. But Prof Sucharit Bhakdi of Mainz, who shares my view, is a virologist. Your point? https://t.co/U2yqmHalqK
Ah, Commissar Fogarty @shelaghfogarty, like Wee Willie Winkie running through the town making sure everyone's in bed, rushes around the rail network trying to get people to muzzle themselves. Isn't there something a bit Freudian about this preoccupation? https://t.co/X7SldQ6KzB
Quite @iainmartin1 . We are being ruled by decree, and it is probably ultra vires. But constututions are only as good as their defenders. Media, MPs and courts have so far *all* failed to defend the rule of law. So you're stuck with me. https://t.co/WfsNttttwb
If the UK is now acceptedly not a democracy (even a Parliamentary one), not under valid law, not even under competent administration, then anything is justified by way of resistance.
We live in a time where the globalist/Marxist agenda is so advanced, even The Telegraph – a formerly conservative newspaper – is ridiculing people for not wanting to sexualise children. I hope you're ready for what's coming. pic.twitter.com/HQhlkCyI4I
A cultural revolution, indeed at first a cultural purge, is the most necessary revolutionary action in the UK. The mass media is sick and rotten to the core, the worst of all being the BBC. There has to be a wholesale purge of mass media personnel. Press, online outlets, TV, radio etc. TV is the worst. Harsh measures are necessary.
‘In the last 10 years, we see an average of 500,000 acres burn in an entire year. We've seen that nearly double in the past three days,’ said Oregon Governor Kate Brown as wind-driven wildfires burned through forests and towns in U.S. West Coast states https://t.co/66vMxeXuo5pic.twitter.com/1I3aY0BSbb
The planet is showing signs it’s in peril. Recently, the world has seen ferocious wildfires in the U.S., torrential rains in Africa, weirdly warm temperatures on the surface of tropical oceans and record heat waves from California to the Siberian Arctic https://t.co/YfTHPuXE1bpic.twitter.com/WIMa1mkjZB
While I do not accept the mainstream narrative re. the overall causation of climate change, a change is in some form happening. The major problem that the world has is that there are too many people, and that really means too many black, brown and yellow people: persons of African and Asian descent, mainly. Numbers. Percentages too.
The above tweet refers to events in the USA, but applies to the UK and mainland Europe to an equal extent.
It is clear that, for social nationalists, online activism, though good and useful, is not enough. Do not be dependent on it, or on funds from it. As for those enemies intent on taking away your rights, you cannot oppose them effectively just by tweeting, leaving messages on Facebook or, for that matter, writing a blog.
Late music
The most brilliant staging of it that I have ever seen.
Ian Robert Millard 