Tag Archives: Greenwich Royal Observatory

Alison Chabloz, Alt-Right, Campaign Against AntiSemitism, daily blog, Defence, diary blog, Dr Rahmeh Aladwan, Farage, free speech, historical, historical revisionism, Ian Millard, immigration, Jewish lobby in UK, Katie Hopkins, Labour Friends of Israel, Laurence Fox, Mark Lewis, Matt Goodwin, MPs, Party Politics, Reminiscences and Musings, Russia and Russian relations, society, Sophie Meaden, Starmer, The Great Replacement, Tommy Robinson, Uncategorized

Diary Blog, 22 November 2025

4 Comments

Morning music

Saturday quiz

Well, a modest 4/10 this week, but enough to beat the 1/10 scored by political journalist John Rentoul. I thought the questions more difficult than usual this week. I knew the answers to questions 2, 4, 7, and 9. I should also have got questions 5 and 8, but did not.

From the blog

“Re. the Royal Mulatta, it is so funny watching the self-describing “Left” defend “Meghan”, simply because she is “black” (actually, of course, a half-caste, like Obama). No matter that she has, apparently, bullied her staff etc, she’s “black”. That’s her anytime Get Out Of Jail Free card.

As for the Royal Cuck, what can one say? Why are the “socialists” of Twitter not asking the question “why should we respect the Royal Cuck anyway?“

Were Prince Harry mere Harry Who?, he would be, at best, a junior Army officer or something like a car salesman.

The concept of royalty, in the real world, is mainly dependent on blood descent. Even leaving aside the Royal Cuck, the Royal Mulatta has no right, really, yet she is given the title of “duchess”. They have both forfeited any right to position and respect, and they have done what they have done for money and to be “celebrities” on American TV.

Actually, these contaminated British titles (duke, duchess, earl, baroness etc) are now so devalued that they really should be done away with.

I suppose that the ludicrous “Royal Married with Children” soap will continue. It’s a good alternative, for American TV, to other wealthy “celebrity” riff-raff such as the Kardashians.

A good “conspiracy theory” might be that the Royal Cuck and the Royal Mulatta are being built up as a way of engaging the interest of Britain’s new raceless, cultureless masses, who have little time for the traditional royals. I don’t suppose that such is the case (it’s too subtle for the royals, I expect) but an interesting idea an sich…

Musing….it seems to me that the Harry and Meghan marriage might be described as “White royal privilege meets black affirmative action privilege”. Just an idle thought…

The best way of describing Meghan Markle would be as in the old German saying, “Put a beggar on a horse and (s)he rides it to death“…”

[from the blog post published 4 March 2021]

Was I wrong?

Tweets seen

That seated figure is Peter Kyle MP, currently Secretary of State for Business and Trade, mentioned before on the blog in relation to links to “dodgy” finance companies, the Jew-Zionist/Israel lobby, and also to a former Labour MP said to have been involved with illegal gay sexual activities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Kyle

The comment is satirical, reflecting the 10-year sentence handed down to Nathan Gill for having taken money from Russian sources in return for influence in the European Parliament; yet MPs involved with the Israelis face no such sanctions at this time.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwy17y5g2x5o

[“Our government and the media have done such a good job with manipulating the population. I’ve even had someone stop talking to me just for mentioning the Pakistani grooming gangs a while ago. Our government aren’t just complicit in physical harm against the population, they are also complicit in psychological warfare against us too.“]

You see the same in the current msm revival of the ludicrous pro-“lockdown” propaganda of a few years ago. BBC News and Sky News have both been full of it for days. Many people have been completely brainwashed by that (and by the whole previous “Covid” scamdemic/panicdemic fear propaganda).

So according to that Rivkah Brown person, to denounce usury, or interest-collecting parasitism, is “antisemitic“? Ha. Interesting…

Dr. Aladwan is facing a well-organized Jew-Zionist attack on her membership of her profession. After my improper, wrongful and unlawful disbarment of 2016, the “CEO” of the tiny but (((well-funded))) “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”], the liar and (in my well-founded opinion) perjurer, Gideon Falter, crowed to the Daily Mail and other msm that my case “set a precedent”, and that members of other professions would now be (my words) in the firing line. So it has proven to be.

My disbarment was (formally, at least) instigated not by the CAA itself but by another pack of Zionist Jews, “UK Lawyers for Israel” [“UKLFI”], but the memberships or support bases of “CAA” and “UKLFI” overlap to some extent. For example, the dishonest and incompetent solicitor and Israel fanatic, Mark Lewis, belongs or has belonged to both, and has been active in both, holding office of sorts in at least one.

Nick Griffin blog

https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/unattractive-unfeminine-and-mannish

Well worth reading.

See also my own thoughts, published some years ago, on pre-WW1 “terrorism”:

Terrorism and Reason

Late tweets seen

Our animal friends.

Ha ha…

Britain cannot go to war with anyone. Its armed forces are now mostly rubbish, and very small in world terms, and there is no need for “us” to fight anyone. The only battles that matter at present are internal and around our coasts, and those battles are not going our way, so far.

[“In 2006 Frank Ellis, a former SAS soldier turned academic, was suspended from Leeds University for highlighting racial and gender differences in IQ. Ellis supported his claims with evidence (e.g. Murray’s Bell Curve) but the university didn’t want to see evidence, it wanted his silence which Ellis would not give them. Ellis, like his hero Enoch Powell, was no racist. He was multilingual (including in Arabic) and held degrees in Russian and German studies and a PhD in Russian literature. His contemporaries in the SAS has he didn’t have a racist bone in his body and be served alongside many non-white soldiers as a Para and SAS soldier. He embraced different cultures and peoples, he just didn’t want those cultures and peoples living alongside him. He was willing to discuss racial and gender differences and he advocated for repatriation having concluded multiculturalism had not and could not work. You can always tell when an idea has some legs because the ideologues on the other side refuse to debate the idea. They’ll happily debate topics they believe are winnable or debatable, but they hate debating topics for which there is a lot of independent scientific and statistical literature. Universities should be truth seeking institutions regardless of the inconveniences that causes for certain political ideologies. We cannot claim to have political or intellectual freedom if some people, parties, and ideas are off limits.”]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Ellis_(lecturer)

…and the gulling of the gullible continues. Fake “nationalist” organizations such as Reform UK, the “Tommy Robinson” set-up, and individuals such as Katie Hopkins, Laurence Fox etc are all pro-Jew, pro-Israel, and conflate support for Israel and the Jewish lobby with a “pro-Brit” position. They wave Israeli flags alongside Union flags. The activist Jews, e.g. the malicious perjuring “CAA” cabal, do the same; they wave not only Israeli flags (sometimes even asking their supporters not to bring Israeli flags), and also wave Union Jacks.

[“Identity politics wasn’t just for distraction and division. It was also a tool to make people seem way less credible when they finally woke up to what has been going on. “Oh he has autism so he must have just developed a new odd obsession” “Oh she has bipolar so she’s obviously just having an episode” Etc etc etc. There is a reason why so many patriots have mental health and/or learning disability diagnoses and it’s way more sinister why so than a lot of people realise. The majority of people with newer diagnoses do not actually have them, I can guarantee it. Social contagions have been a psyop.“]

Until a couple of years ago, a very unprofessional NHS psychiatrist prolific online, one Tim G. Stevens, often insulted me on Twitter/X (not that such has ever bother me; water off a duck’s back). He identified with Israel and the Jew-Zionists, despite not being Jewish (possibly “part-” but even that is uncertain).

Stevens even made up, years ago, a story to the effect that I, satirical singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz, and another, were plotting to attack him and his family (wife and two daughters) at their home in or near Loughton, Essex. A total pack of lies. He even claimed that I and the other two mentioned would be going to prison, and for a long time. A number of utter mugs on Twitter actually believed Stevens, and commiserated online with him!

The Essex NHS trust which employs or employed Stevens provided Alison Chabloz with a formal apology, and I was given a sort-of apology by that NHS trust, and told that Stevens would be subject to disciplinary proceedings (the third party did not want to involve herself in anything by complaining formally).

Since then, Stevens both spoke on ethics at the official convention for psychiatrists a few years ago (you really cannot make up this scheiss!) and was hospitalized with delusions for a while. As someone remarked, the psychiatrist was in need of a psychiatrist…

Well, the unpleasant and malicious Tim G. Stevens, aka “Dr. Dim”, has not tweeted for the past 18 months, but I have no idea whether he has simply stopped tweeting, has been admitted full-time into a mental hospital as a patient, or has “gone up the chimney” like quite a few others over the years who have plotted against me.

I should really have sued in libel. I would have won, hands-down, would have got a little bit of money (in damages and costs), and would have put Stevens and others in their place. Never mind. What goes around comes around…

Ah, well…

#TenGreenBottles

Incidentally, you can read more about the egregious psychiatrist (and amateur/self-published spy-thriller writer) below:

They’re Coming To Take Me Away, Ha Ha!

Later tweet seen

Translates to a Commons with about 414 Reform MPs, 75 Lab, 53 LibDems, 44 SNP, 16 Cons, 14 Greens.

Sea-change.

Incidentally, were my prediction to come to pass of a Con Party vote falling to 10% by the time of the next general election, those 14 Con Party MPs would reduce in number to…2.

Late music

Alt-Right, Defence, ethnostate, historical, immigration, Reminiscences and Musings, society, The Great Replacement, Uncategorized

Terrorism and Reason

4 Comments

Thoughts about the recent “Islamist” terrorists

When Joseph Conrad wrote The Secret Agent in 1907, he used as the basis for his plot a real plot of 1894 to blow up the Royal Observatory, Greenwich: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_Agent#Background:_Greenwich_Bombing_of_1894

In 1920, Conrad wrote this about a discussion about that real event of 1894:

“…we recalled the already old story of the attempt to blow up the Greenwich Observatory; a blood-stained inanity of so fatuous a kind that it was impossible to fathom its origin by any reasonable or even unreasonable process of thought. For perverse unreason has its own logical processes. But that outrage could not be laid hold of mentally in any sort of way, so that one remained faced by the fact of a man blown to bits for nothing even most remotely resembling an idea, anarchistic or other. As to the outer wall of the Observatory it did not show as much as the faintest crack. I pointed all this out to my friend, who remained silent for a while and then remarked in his characteristically casual and omniscient manner: “Oh, that fellow was half an idiot”.” [Wikipedia re. Conrad— The Secret Agent: A Simple Tale]

The supposed attempt on the Royal Observatory has in the past been described as “pure terrorism”, in that there could be no direct political “reason” to explode a bomb at or destroy the Observatory. I say “supposed” attempt because it was never proven, though it is hard to imagine any other reason why an anarchist carrying a bomb would climb the hill from Greenwich. Anyone who has been there knows that, to this day, the Royal Observatory stands alone, apart from an ice-cream shack etc, at the highest point of Greenwich Park; there is there no obvious other potential target:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenwich_Park#Royal_Observatory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_Bourdin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenwich_Park

In more recent years, that is in the 1990s, the Provisional IRA blew up buildings in London etc, trying as far as possible not to injure or kill anyone. That secondary intention was not born out of compassion or military decency, but purely out of reasoned calculation: destruction of important buildings in the City of London and elsewhere hit the “British Establishment” but resulted in little or no public outrage.

That campaign of the 1990s was in fact the polar opposite of the 1970s bombings of the Provisionals. Those 1970s attacks were poorly conceived from the political point of view and were, in some of the most outrageous examples, designed to kill or injure as many people as possible. The targeted buildings were often pubs sometimes frequented by British soldiers (entirely or almost entirely “other ranks”) as well as by civilian members of the public.

The Baltic Exchange was one such 1990s attack. I happened to hear the massive bomb detonate. At the time, I was in a small cafe-restaurant in Bloomsbury, nearly 3 miles away, with my then girlfriend. The sound of a bomb of that sort is distinctive. I remarked on it. We were puzzled.

In fact, despite the evening timing, the location of the target (uncrowded in evening) and a 20-minute warning, three people were killed (and 91 injured).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baltic_Exchange_bombing

The IRA (in collaboration, inconsistently, with Sinn Fein) had a political purpose and a strategy. Basically, a United Ireland, achieved via making Northern Ireland too much of a nuisance to hold on to.

It could be argued that, despite the apparent sincerity of the “peace talks” that led eventually to the Good Friday Agreement, Sinn Fein/IRA “won”, strategically: power sharing in a democratic Northern Ireland (which is leading over time to a Catholic/Republican and so Sinn Fein victory, via the greater birth rate of the Catholic/Republican community); as Mosley predicted decades before, greater concordance of Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic within the EU (until Brexit, at least…); Sinn Fein to pursue a peaceful political strategy in the South— which seemed unrealistic and even quixotic to me, but not now that —over 20 years on— Sinn Fein has become the most significant political party in the Republic and may form a government:

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1240551/varadkar-irish-election-sinn-fein-united-ireland-leo-varadkar-gael-bbc-newsnight

Other “terrorist” campaigns have been launched over the years and decades, but they have all had serious political aims: Jews against the British in Palestine, Arabs against the Jews in Palestine/Israel, Communists and Social-Revolutionaries in imperial Russia etc.

Now let us move to these “Islamist” terrorists (in the UK) of recent years. They appear to have no directing brain or organization, and any “allegiance” to the main body of the ISIS barbarians seems to be little more than notional.

More than that, the individuals seem to want to create havoc as far as they can, but in the absence of heavy-duty weaponry can only do so using whatever weapons are freely available: knives, axes etc, cold weapons generally.

Targets have generally been ordinary members of the public. Even the police have mostly been killed or injured not because they were the main targets, but because they became involved in the course of fulfilling their duty.

What is the political aim of the “Islamist” terrorist? There seems to be none, save for a generalized or “pie in the sky” wish that the UK, along with the rest of Europe and the rest of the world, turns to Islam and adopts Sharia law. I suppose that that desire might be described as having been the aim of Islam since its foundation in the 7th Century:

 

The term “Islamist” is in fact only a convenient label. It appears that the recent UK “Islamist” terrorists, such as the Streatham attacker, knew little of their own religion.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51351885

Certainly most have not been noted as having attended specifically-Islamic madrassahs. The Streatham attacker had attended secular schools in or near London and was only 20 at time of death.

No attempt has, as yet, been made by such “Islamists” (in the UK) to assassinate any famous politician or high-ranking military figure. That may be purely because the “Islamist” terrorists, as “lone wolves” or small groups, have not the ability or means to undertake reconnaissance or intelligence work in order to discover addresses, schedules, daily habits etc.

The recent “Islamist” attackers have no real political or religious aims. The connecting thread seems to be a wish to hurt and kill non-Muslims and to achieve a spurious “martyrdom” by being “killed in battle”, i.e. shot by police or SAS during an incident. The secular equivalent is called, in the USA, “suicide by cop”. They have no real strategy and their tactics are pathetic. They not only have no prospect of success or victory but also no way of even forming a conception of what such success or victory might look like.

In short, “Islamist” terrorism, like Islam itself, is a dead end. Islamist terrorism can lead to nothing on the socio-political level and its only results are, and can only be, death. Death for any victims, and death for the “Islamists” themselves. A form of evil not seen in Europe previously, even during the Mongol invasion of the 13th Century.

What can be done? Nothing, directly. If a state has within its borders millions of Muslims, a certain small proportion of them will fall victim, in their own uneducated or semi-educated minds, to Islamism. Perhaps one in a thousand. There are about 3 million Muslims in the UK, so maybe 3,000 potential terrorists. In fact, that is the figure the police are suggesting [see Notes, below]. Others may also be radicalized, usually blacks of non-Muslim origin.

The only long term solution is for Britain to become an ethnostate, and Europe a collection of ethnostates. In the meantime, these stupid, pointless and unpleasant attacks will continue.

Notes

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/feb/05/police-chief-cressida-dick-defends-streatham-attack-surveillance-operation

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/mohiussunnath-chowdhury-terror-buckingham-palace-sword-attack-tommy-robinson-a9322286.html