Happened to see a tweet about the most recent Extinction Rebellion demonstrations (or should that be “tantrums”?):
Extinction Rebellion has begun two weeks of protests, but Professor Frank Furedi calls it "moral and physical blackmail on the lives of ordinary people".
I would not in general be much on the same page as Frank Furedi, or indeed radio loudmouth Julia Hartley-Brewer, whom I had to set straight once or twice when I had a Twitter account (a few malicious Jews managed to have me expelled in 2018), but “there is no religion higher than truth”, as they say…
Socio-political hypocrisy: there’s a lot of it about. Not that the phenomenon is new. For decades, there have been the pro-immigration and “refugees welcome” idiots and virtue-signallers; more often than not they live in leafy suburban areas where the effects of the UK migration-invasion have been muted, at least on the surface.
I myself recall a girlfriend of the 1980s who once said to me (we were certainly not ideologically completely compatible!) that the British people who did not want mass immigration were mostly those who did not like to see council houses going to immigrants instead of to them! A neat British way of bringing social snobbery into the discussion (something that we saw also in recent years in relation to Brexit: the Remainer mythus that pro-Brexit people were little more than British hillbillies).
Easy for a woman whose father, upon her return from living in a foreign capital, simply bought her a London house outright as a present, who got paid far more for occasional or part-time work than most people did for working full-time, and who also had considerable inheritance expectations, to express scarcely-veiled contempt for the poorer section of the British population.
She simply did not see that many poorer British people were and are angered by the way alien imports take British social housing. Not everyone can be housed just by asking their father to buy them a house!
Just yesterday it came to light that central government is helping local councils buy “large houses” so that Afghan families with 10 or 12 members can live in them. Most of those large houses will be in the more expensive neighbourhoods as well, so British people are going to be doubly cheated.
The British people will also end up working, and being taxed, so that the Afghans (and the rest) can live parasitically upon the Brits. The Afghans will mostly not even speak English, will mostly have no skills or qualifications, but will have (according to studies) a far lower average I.Q. than the British, and so will be just a drag or a millstone round the necks of the people of this country.
Tweets seen
2/2 Jonni @jdportes. Your approach, to start with the theory, and to choose those figures which suit that theory( the fashionable but i suspect doomed Blairite view that manufactiring employment doesn't matter) is the classic approach of the dogmatist…. https://t.co/Riehfc3Omq
3/2 Jonni @jdportes. The belief you try to defend with these figures, as well as wholly lacking concern for human beings, is the policy which led directly to the Trump convulsion you no doubt despise. His election was the revolt of those whose lost jobs you think don't matter. https://t.co/Riehfc3Omq
Jonni @jdportes. I stick to what I first said, that most of it was destroyed after we entered the Common Market in 1972. Subsequent events, measure them how you will (and I believe such measurements are variable) , do not alter that observable fact. The jobs never came back. https://t.co/GL7QiMwUHT
Councils 'will be given grants to buy family homes to house refugees'.
If you still feel the slightest obligation to pay tax to a regime hell-bent on turning your children into an oppressed minority, there's something very wrong with your moral compass. https://t.co/lzCuiOsbqQ
How to characterize the Extinction Rebellion nonsense and demonstrations? “Woodstock with worry”?
FRANCE: Reims tonight – this is the makeshift restaurant of the day – around 200 people – no Vax Pass – just the Resistance taking over the street. Free people – isn’t it beautiful? 👊🏻🇫🇷#NonAuPassDeLaHontehttps://t.co/HMOmE36T0B
In the recent Alison Chabloz appeal, the Crown Prosecution Service applied for an absurdly badly-drafted (well, is it a surprise? “Pay peanuts, get monkeys”) Criminal Behaviour Order against Alison. The judge apparently treated that with the contempt it deserved, and refused to make such an order. No doubt the application was suggested in some way by the malicious Jew-Zionists who are behind the whole persecution (and prosecutions) of Alison Chabloz.
#BLM leader shows typical Communist leadership hypocrisy when it comes to spending donors' dollars and Soros' shekels on a new home…. https://t.co/SW6Z1AIJoq
And here are more arguments against marijuana legalisation. The claims of the legalisers have all been shown to be false in practice. Yet they do not give up, because their real argument was always a combination of greed for money, and selfish pleasure https://t.co/2PAaVinuLihttps://t.co/q4voI3Bk8r
Key claim of marijuana legalisers was that legalisation would put illegal gangs out of business. That (like everything else they say) turned out to be bilge, as I warned it would: 'Stoners cheered when Canada legalised cannabis. How did it go so wrong?' https://t.co/KwRZ5MvCyY
My own view of cannabis (and other illegal drugs) and the law is that, while the clarity of complete decriminalization appeals, I despise drug abusers, and would prefer either drug abuse to cease to exist, or drug abusers to cease to exist (or be eliminated).
On the other hand, the present system is not working.
I am also cognizant of the fact that societies where cannabis use is prevalent tend to fall to pieces, as Hafiz, the Persian poet, saw happening in his own country many centuries ago, and as one can see in the areas of the world where cannabis use is prevalent; Jamaica, for one.
All the —mainly British— people I knew when younger (1970s, 1980s), those who regularly smoked marijuana, dropped out of society to a greater or lesser extent.
Please understand that every time you hear the media or academics blaming white people for 'systemic racism', talking about 'white privilege' or 'racial injustice' caused by whites, they are building an antiwhite narrative that has deadly real-world consequences. pic.twitter.com/HVFO5walbt
That anti-white narrative or stream of constant msm propaganda particularly affects the blacks, who as a group tend to lack logical-critical thinking skills.
Fantastic article about the systematic abuse of English girls and the complicity of the f… government, the media and the police. White people, you are under attack! Wake up! Please, pass it on!https://t.co/3VjPSDakz0
Great News! Don't fall for the BS. The only thing the COVID passport issue will succeed at doing, is to wake up more people to the NWO plan, to turn the UK into a communist bio-security driven tyrannical police state. The great awakening is inevitable. https://t.co/a7aSHcRxje
Top Twitter tip: if you're "disappointed" by someone you follow giving their opinion on something, maybe this social media platform isn't for you. You can unfollow, mute or block that person, but don't tell them what they can and can't say. This isn't North Korea quite yet…
Radio loudmouth Julia Hartley-Brewer (who blocked me years ago on Twitter when I exposed her ignorance on a point or two of law and procedure) seems to be turning a blind eye to the abuses carried out by the Jew-Zionist lobby. She has never said a word in support of the free speech of those attacked, and even prosecuted, at the instigation of packs of Zionist Jews such as the “Campaign Against Antisemitism”. I wonder why?
Yes, Laurence Fox and his “Reclaim Party” can be put in the same bin as all the rest of the controlled opposition: Reform UK, Brexit Party, UKIP, “anti-immigration” “Conservatives”, Katie Hopkins, “Tommy Robinson”, Breitbart, “Prison Planet” Watson, “Sargon of Akkad”, Delingpole, Toby Young and his fake “Free Speech Union” etc etc.
Don't be complacent. This isn't going to end anytime soon. Remove them all from office & replace with our own people. Only then can we put OUR agenda in place. ⚔️ ⚖️
…meanwhile, in England, the people amuse themselves with football, rugby, tennis or cricket matches on TV, the latest meaningless msm gossip, the latest “celebrities” one has never heard of, and they worry about their booking of controlled, mask-wearing, machine-holidays of the upcoming summer.
And why, when all of the books show that modern nations are astronomically in debt to that banking consortium, do they seem to get away with continually increasing their 'borrowing' and deferring 'repayment'?
… the committee becomes a wake. The world is now being run by calculating miscreants who have understood this from the beginning. https://t.co/OkRKeZj4JM
When did you realize humanity is being slowly assimilated into an AI hive mind cloud consciousness by satanic occultists who worship lower astral beings that are trying to escape entropy by creating their own universe by synthetic means?
Seems that the hysterical hate-filled Left Waffen SS have now *cancelled* David Jason as well as the Queen. It's easy to laugh at them, but it's actually quite dangerous. Our post-modernist infatuated academic system is pumping out generations of kids who are mentally ill.
— Sozzinski (Person without a cervix) (@Sozzinski) April 10, 2021
Four Scotland opinon polls this week put pro-independence parties on 52% & pro-union parties on 48% in total constituency votes https://t.co/Q3Lw9V0PjD
Is that so? If the new Alba Party challenges the SNP in most Scottish constituencies, and effectively enough so that other parties come through the middle (Conservative, LibDem, Labour), then yes. It may well be, though (and I never claim great knowledge of Scottish politics) that many voters “up there” will choose between Alba Party and SNP, and simply dump the others.
Voters who are pro-Independence but anti-SNP. I do not know whether that is so, and whether there are even any pro-Independence but anti-SNP voters.
I am guessing, but it may be that Salmond’s quite recent sex crime trial has mortally wounded him politically, even if he was formally acquitted.
Either way, it does seem that “Independence”, however nebulous a concept that is in the Scottish context where a new Scotland might still be tied into EU, IMF, World Bank, NATO etc, is gaining ground with Scottish voters. That might have big geopolitical implications.
Well, I see that John Rentoul has again been defeated by me, this week scoring only 3/10. My own score was 6/10 (I did not know the answers to questions 4, 6, 9 and 10).
Scotland got the UK govt it wanted 1945-70, 1974-79, 1997-2010; for 43 of 70 years (61% of the time) 1945-2015, when Scotland voted SNP & could not by definition get UK govt it wanted https://t.co/YWydPnMK5p
In 2015, the SNP captured 56 out of the 59 Scottish seats in the Commons; in 2017, 35 out of 59, and in 2019, 48 out of 59. “Scotland” therefore, supposedly “voted SNP”.
In reality though, meaning in terms of the popular vote, the SNP only scored 50%, 36.9% and 45% in those years.
Four Scotland opinon polls this week put pro-independence parties on 52% & pro-union parties on 48% in total constituency votes https://t.co/Q3Lw9V0PjD
Usually, when there is a successful popular movement for a country to leave a larger country or empire, there is a large popular majority for that: 90% in favour, perhaps; certainly 80%. In Scotland, any majority at all is likely to be small, maybe 55% for and 45% against.
Another 49 “detained” (i.e. registered, given shelter and food and about £50 a week in spending money, then allowed to roam British streets).
In fact, not 49 but 175, because the French navy etc “detained” 126 others, then brought them to Dover!
175 a day now, in the winter. That will be 500 a day, probably more, by midsummer. Note also that most of the invaders today were picked up by French naval forces, then “escorted to Britain“!
“Many appeared to be men of African origin with one young teenage boy spotted among the groups.“
This is a disguised shuttle service, designed to flood the UK with more untermenschen, and in large numbers over time. In ordinary language, treason.
“Ruben Hood, Ruben Hood, riding through the glen…”
I happened to catch the end credits of an episode of the 1950s TV series The Adventures of Robin Hood [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Adventures_of_Robin_Hood_(TV_series)], which I recall seeing as a young child (I was born in 1956, but the series was being shown in the UK until 1961 or even later).
I was unaware until today that the executive producer was a Jewish woman called Hannah Weinstein [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannah_Weinstein]: “In 1952, after settling in London, she established her own production company, Sapphire Films, financially aided by the American Communist Party.[3][4] The company eventually made series for the British commercial ITV network via an arrangement with ITC‘s Lew Grade.” [Wikipedia].
Who would have thought it? Robin Hood filmed by an American Jewess closely connected with the American Communist Party?
Even I am amazed that the contamination of (in) UK-based TV was so blatant as long ago as 1956.
Maybe the theme song was a clue, using the Scottish word “glen” for a location in England. I noted also, today, that the Script Supervisor was one “Ruben”…
Tweets seen
With the National Strangulation Policy now extended for months, the Great Lockdown Debate between me and @dpjhodges is as important as ever. Almost 200,000 have watched it. You can watch it here : https://t.co/QKnixZWoSz
One key thing to watch is what now happens to test and trace, etc? Will we be able to live our lives without being tracked? Or will this persist indefinitely? Also, will many places, official and commercial , continue to insist on face coverings?
Because @juliahb1, almost all media now operate on the assumption that what the state says is true unless proven to be false (and regard it as none of their business to check). https://t.co/WCl1FPIeyM
From 1939. When I set foot on the Charles Bridge, in 1988, there were even fewer people than in that 1939 photograph.
It occurs to me, not for the first time, that a major difference between the UK and most of Europe is that, by reason of the Second World War and other upheavals, those other countries have had to look at and revalue their societies and institutions in a way that Britain has not. Not to anything like the same extent. Which is perhaps why Britain has institutions of various sorts that really are running on empty, that are just shells, without much real substance.
What do I mean by the above? Look at, inter alia, Parliament (the Commons and, even more so, the House of Lords), the Monarchy, the FPTP voting system, the Bar, the overall educational system, and the devalued Honours system.
Midday music
More tweets
@bvgroat. Thanks for the kind words. No, we must not exaggerate this. Repression in the Soviet-dominated lands was made of iron. The limits on freedom we face here are made of marshmallow. But Soviet Communism was ailing and dying. Our new despotism is healthy and growing. https://t.co/uHErGcx4aW
Not that I “support” the invasion of Budapest by the Red Army looters and rapists of 1945, but my “support” or “opposition” is scarcely relevant, 76 years after the event.
Of course, this is “cartoon history”, of less truth, probably, than Francis Drake playing bowls on Plymouth Hoe, or other events.
More tweets
On this day 1820 The Cato Street Conspiracy (Arthur Thistlewood) to assassinate Cabinet ministers was uncovered. Of 18 conspirators 5 hanged (Newgate prison 1/05/1820) 6 transported to 🇦🇺 & remaining rewarded/ released for status as spies, provocateurs or turning King's Evidence pic.twitter.com/Oka1qE8sVt
Dictatorial “lockdown”, mishandled Brexit, continuing mass immigration (though slowed by some voluntary repatriation over past months), collapsing real economy, sliding real estate values in London. Mass unemployment. Huge divides opening up, socially, culturally and politically.
There is no “revolutionary situation” in the UK. Not yet. By 2022, there may be, or at least the start of one.
Tweet seen
Can we just go full 1940 and lock these 5th Columnists up already? Bored to tears with their fluffing for fascism https://t.co/pUVZMuUwgr
“Dr” Louise Raw, prolific “antifascist” tweeter, fantasizing about being able to arrest, have arrested, or see being arrested, those with whom she disagrees socially or politically. Not “just” those she and her type label “fascist”, “Nazi”, “neo-Nazi” etc, but also persons such as American alt-Right journalist Andrew Ngo, or London radio loudmouth Julia Hartley-Brewer.
On the other hand, to compare “Dr” Raw or her like to Trotsky or Stalin (or Dzerzhinsky for that matter) would be even more silly than her labelling of others. As Marx commented in The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, the “first time tragedy, second time, farce“. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Eighteenth_Brumaire_of_Louis_Bonaparte.
As I have often noted in this blog, “socialism” died around 1989 and has been replaced by the grotesqueries of “Black Lives Matter”, LGBTQXYZ nonsense, “trans” nonsense, “antiracism” nonsense and all the other socio-political absurdities we now see around the self-describing “Left”.
Silly people such as “Dr” Raw tweet about locking people up for their views, but she at least seems (?) to have enough awareness to realize that she and her cohorts cannot actually do that. She and they are reduced to bleating that the State, or someone, or anyone, should take such measures.
The self-describing UK “Left” is now the haunt not of the scoundrel, not solely anyway, but of those in a comfortable, unthinking, and mutually-supporting niche, who want to be told what to think, say or do by the EU, official bodies, “Covid marshals” etc. Thus they love Twitter, and their greatest joy is to see someone of whom they disapprove expelled from Twitter. They put forward no programme, have no political traction, and are basically irrelevant.
I might add, “ask not for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee“…
Incidentally, Kim Philby [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Philby] was a great admirer of Eighteenth Brumaire. I expect that he would have known the fact noted below:
“In the preface to the second edition of The Eighteenth Brumaire, Marx stated that the purpose of this essay was to “demonstrate how the class struggle in France created circumstances and relationships that made it possible for a grotesque mediocrity to play a hero’s part.”[1]” [Wikipedia] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Eighteenth_Brumaire_of_Louis_Bonaparte. [my bold emphasis].
Is that how Philby secretly viewed himself? As a “grotesque mediocrity” nonetheless able to play a role arguably (in Philby’s mind?) “heroic”? Was that one reason why Philby drank so much, that dissonance?
I suppose that we shall never know. In any event, I myself am sceptical of the (supposed) importance or significance of Philby, despite the books which continue to be churned out about him, mostly in the UK.
As a matter of fact, I once (in fact more than once; several times) met someone who had once met Philby, or at least had heard him give a lecture. I should have been more curious and asked about that person’s impression of the “great spy” and/or “great traitor”.
More tweets
This thread should terrify anybody who cares about liberty or democracy. The government is killing off legal aid criminal law solicitors. Without them, the rule of law crumbles. https://t.co/9G9JXuy1Up
One of the most telling ways in which the Jew-Zionist lobby has poisoned the UK is in the “denial” label. First there was “holocaust” “denial”, aimed at anyone, whether professional historian or not, questioning the “holocaust” narrative in whole or part (even the ludicrous “gas chambers” nonsense).
After that came climate change “denial”, a term aimed at anyone questioning the causes or effects of what was originally termed “global warming”. As with “holocaust” “denial”, it turns out that the “deniers” have at least the preponderance of fact on their side: Prince Charles and others were wrong when they said, in 2009, that humanity had 3, then 5, then 7 years “to save the planet”.
It turned out that the “experts” were not only wrong but actively mendacious in saying that the Himalayan glaciers would soon melt completely, resulting in the Ganges, Indus and Brahmaputra all running dry.
‘Gore claims the snowcap atop Africa’s Mt. Kilimanjaro is shrinking and that global warming is to blame. Yet according to the November 2003 issue of Nature magazine, “Although it’s tempting to blame the ice loss on global warming, researchers think deforestation of the mountain’s foothills is the more likely culprit. Without the forests’ humidity, previously moisture-laden winds blew dry. No longer replenished with water, the ice is evaporating in the strong equatorial sunshine.”‘ “
Well, now we have “Covid-19” “denial”! Anyone questioning the origins of “the virus”, anyone saying that the World Economic Forum and others are using the virus as a means for a “Great Reset”, anyone questioning the utility of repressive government measures such as facemask-mandating, “lockdowns” etc is a “denier”, a kind of heretic, probably a criminal or even a murderer…
This is that happens when it becomes a heresy to question officially-supported fact-narratives. Beware.
More tweets
Well, @djflatwhite, in free countries, you have to win debates if you wish to right wrongs. Its a necessary, though not a sufficient, condition. https://t.co/2pYIGflXQ0
Peter Hitchens still regards the UK as sort-of “free”. Debatable?
The U.K. had a perfectly good plan for a pandemic, 70 pages of experience, knowledge and common sense, drawn up in 2011 – and ditched in the great panic of March 2020 pic.twitter.com/ngbj5MN2sy
Easily @plasfron@johnrentoul. Pol Pot's policy was unhinged, Mao's Great Leap Forward was unhinged, Hitler's massacre of Europoean Jews was unhinged. Burning down your house to get rid of a wasps' nest is unhinged.Problem is to know it, and be able to point it out, at the time. https://t.co/6KSngk1xUA
Hitler’s policy was resettlement of Jews. Millions did leave Germany, millions left Europe, in the 1930s and early 1940s. USA, UK, Australia, Palestine, and other places too.
What was “unhinged” was the UK and France offering Poland a “guarantee” in 1939 which was not worth the paper on which it was written. That spurious “guarantee” triggered WW2 as surely as the mass mobilizations of 1914 had triggered WW1.
More accurately, the “guarantee” to Poland, when not just ignored by the UK and France on the fateful days of 1-3 September 1939, triggered that disastrous war.
Why is nationalism okay for Jewish people, for black people, and for indigenous Americans but not for ethnic British people and whites in general?
HnH is yet another unaccountable anti-white group that blacklists books and supervises our speech. It has no place in our society. pic.twitter.com/zzpCYlcq0C
I lived in Cornwall for two years or so (and another two on the Devon side of the Tamar), having from 2002 to 2004 a lease of one of the largest country houses in North Cornwall (seen below in a 1940s photograph):
[above: same house in a more recent photograph]
The immediately above photograph shows me standing by the ballroom carriage entrance. Incidentally, I am not giving a “Hitler” or “Roman” salute, but merely trying to pose “casually” for the picture, as if resting my hand on the stonework. I am not (it goes without saying) a natural photographic subject…
Cornwall offers few people well-paid work; small businesses such as the Cornish Cheese Company (I am not a shareholder, by the way!) need encouragement to succeed or even survive. The geographical location of Cornwall, its relative isolation, increases shipping costs, and so on.
More tweets
Dismayed to read the reports from Bristol. The Labour Party under Keir Starmer is becoming an increasingly inept, anti-democratic, and frankly corrupt political machine.
I have no idea what shenanigans are going on in the Bristol Labour Party, but what might have been expected from Keir Starmer? It amuses me to see the parallels between him and that little pissant, “Conservative” Party Cabinet minister, Robert Jenrick: both completely in the pocket of the Jewish lobby, both married to Jewish wives (both of whom are property lawyers), both having children all being brought up as Jewish (eg celebrating the Jewish supremacist religious holidays etc).
Surprising court judgment
Kids Company judgment is out!! RUPERT BUTLER (acting through Leverets) and Natasha Jackson (instructed by Leverets) successfully defend Camila Batmanghelidjh in the 10-week directors disqualification trial before Falk J.
It is not for me to say whether or not that peculiar woman, Camila Batmanghelidjh, was in some measure a fraud, or whether what she did was in any measure fraudulent. All that can be said was that very large amounts of State funding were spent and probably wasted on a “motley crew” of inner city London ferals. She was in charge (supposedly).
All one can say for sure is that the government of the part-Jew, David Cameron-Levita, was a complete mess.
@johnrentoul. Sweden messed up its care homes (especially in Stockholm) , much as we did. The other Nordic countries did not. The interesting thing about Sweden and the UK is that their outcomes have been so *similar* , despite diverging approaches. https://t.co/Ghb28ZQTnW
3,250 have now commented on the Great Lockdown Debate between me and @dpjhodges and more than 100,000 have watched it. See the comments, watch it and make your own contribution here https://t.co/QKniy0dZK7
Ian Robert Millard 