Morning music
Saturday quiz
Well, this week a clear victory over political journalist John Rentoul; he scored 3/10, but I trumped that with 6/10. I did not know the answers to questions 5, 8, 9, and 10.
Talking point
Utter barbarity.
Talking point
Tweets seen
How is this “news”? It has been obvious to all for weeks.
When I had a Twitter account (the Jew-Zionist lobby had me expelled in 2018 after a long and conspiratorial campaign), I found that practically all the “hate” directed against me came from Israel-fanatic Jews, together with a few non-Jew but vicious and/or mentally unstable types such as fake “doctor” Louise Raw, a loonie from Manchester calling himself “DaveAFAF” and a half-crazy part-Jew psychiatrist called Tim G. Stevens of Essex (Epping Forest area), most of whom were also pro the Jewish lobby and Israel.
One especially egregious one was minor Jewish academic Ben Gidley, who was obsessed with me, my views, my Twitter account etc, and set up a number of pseudonymous Twitter accounts (“BobfromBrockley”, “IntheSoupAgain”, “AntiNazisUnited” etc) in order to troll night and day. Eventually, I worked out his real identity, as did, not long afterward, others such as the journalist Peter Hitchens. Gidley had to shut up and go away after that.
Most, in fact almost all, of the vitriol came from Jews, several of which have now, however, died.
See also:
One has to ask why Jews have been expelled, historically, from over 100 states and territories.
Wall. Squad. End.
Numberplate Enthusiasts’ Club
More tweets seen
See also:
Upsetting to think that some (I hope only a small minority of backward) Americans hurt these lovely creatures.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opossum
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_opossum
I have commented previously on the fact that in the UK we are now moving rapidly to a non-civic society, i.e. one where people vote (whether in elections or when on juries) according to racial and cultural loyalties. Call it the “O.J. Simpson syndrome” if you like.
I fully support the jury system, in principle, and was myself a practising barrister for a number of years (based in London and later Exeter when not overseas) (1992-2008), but the jury system falls to pieces in a “multicultural” society. The same is true of voting “democracy”, and a police force that can be relied upon.
Talking point
At various times in history, states have promulgated “sumptuary laws”, defined by Wikipedia as follows:
“Sumptuary laws (from Latin sūmptuāriae lēgēs) are laws that regulate consumption.[1] Black’s Law Dictionary defines them as “Laws made for the purpose of restraining luxury or extravagance, particularly against inordinate expenditures for apparel, food, furniture, or shoes, etc.”[2] Historically, they were intended to regulate and reinforce social hierarchies and morals through restrictions on clothing, food, and luxury expenditures, often depending on a person’s social rank.
Societies have employed sumptuary laws for various purposes. They were used to try to regulate the balance of trade by limiting the market for expensive imported goods. They made it easy to identify social status and privilege, and as such could be used for social discrimination and to stabilize social hierarchies.[3][1] They could also be used to prevent, or at least reduce, opportunities for political bribery and corruption.
The laws often prevented commoners from imitating the appearance of aristocrats and could be used to stigmatize disfavoured groups. In cities of the Late Middle Ages, sumptuary laws were instituted as a way for the nobility to limit the conspicuous consumption of the prosperous bourgeoisie. Bourgeois subjects as wealthy as or wealthier than the nobility could undermine the latter’s presentation as powerful and legitimate rulers. This could call into question their ability to control and defend their fiefs, thus inspiring traitors and rebels. Such laws continued to be used for these purposes well into the 17th century.”
[Wikipedia]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumptuary_law
I think there are cogent arguments for similar laws in the UK at present. Let’s stamp on the nouveaux riches types (indeed, all of the excessively-rich) and those aping them and their lifestyles, including “influencers” and “celebrities” of one kind and another.
Society needs calm and reason, and a less-materialistic ethos.
Plain living and high thinking.
More tweets
[“BREAKING: its been revealed that Andy Burnham snapped up an ex council flat in Kennington for just £215,000 in 2005 while serving as an MP.
He then happily billed taxpayers for the mortgage interest payments because the rules let him get away with it.
That same flat is now worth 480000 to 500000 pounds and he rents it out while insisting the income barely covers his costs and he makes no profit.
Yet this is the same man demanding rent freezes council housing takeovers and lower rents for ordinary people.
Pure hypocrisy from a classic Westminster grifter feathering his own nest on the back of the system he loves to lecture everyone else about.“]
They destroy everything.
Monkeyworld UK. It really is time to recognize that most of them not only cannot create anything worthwhile, and certainly not a better society, but cannot even live in our existing society as parasites. Pests. Unwanted pests.
I had heard previously of how cruel some of the Israeli Jews are to donkeys. Arabs in Egypt can also be callous towards donkeys, if not actively cruel, and as early as 1914, British people set up charities such as the Brooke Hospital to care for the donkeys of the Middle East; the Arabs either could not or would not. However, there is that perversity in the Jews which we see in other areas, such as their cowardly sadism towards children and other defenceless people in Gaza and elsewhere.
Donkeys are, after cats, my favourite animals. Hard to understand why some lower types would harm them, but that is something one learns with life experience(s)— people are not created equal, in any sense.
Talking point
That was first posted by me about 10 years ago, on Twitter (the Jewish lobby goblins had me expelled from Twitter in 2018).
Ian Robert Millard 
Do you like dogs? I prefer dogs to cats. Most of the cats I have come across in my life have been evil little bastards trying to scratch and/or bite me.🤬😡
LikeLike
John:
There we part company…
I do not exactly dislike dogs, but would never have one myself.
LikeLike
Oh Vey! It is another Shoah!🙄 There are so many ‘fascists’ in Italy!🙄🙄🙄
LikeLike