Morning music
Tweets seen
Links in with the “de-banking” of many other people, from —briefly— Farage to people without Farage’s connections, support base, or money; I am thinking of, inter alia, Sam Melia, Laura Towler, Mark Collett and (I think also) Nick Griffin at one time.
There are the powers of the State, but there are also the powers of corporate entities such as banks, exercised arbitrarily.
No (real) British citizen, i.e. white “proper” Brit, should have his citizenship revoked, for any reason.
That pathetic yet still quite sinister, and plainly defiant, Scottish lesbianka is full of both malice and, indeed, deceit. Apparently, she never noticed that her husband (I believe, now ex-husband) had bought both a motorhome costing £140,000 and a Jaguar SUV costing over £81,000.
So…Nicola Sturgeon visited her parents-in-law, where the new £140,000 motorhome was apparently parked (I thought it was at least once parked outside her own house, too; maybe not) and she remained, she says, totally unaware of its existence because it was parked alongside and not at the front of their house. Possible, if they live somewhere such as Blenheim Palace; otherwise not…
So, also…did Nicola Sturgeon’s “in-laws” never once mention her husband’s (and therefore also her own) massive, newly-bought, and very expensive motorhome to her? Does that seem even marginally plausible? Not to me. They never politely said “we love your lovely new motorhome” or “where do you think you will visit in your new motorhome?“?
As liars go, Nicola Sturgeon is not very believable.
It amuses me that, in order to seem sober, and not spendthrift or dishonest, the SNP has replaced Nicola Sturgeon with a dull fellow called Swinney, but he looks like a head-in-trough bureaucrat type anyway.
Incidentally, latest news is that Nicola Sturgeon is moving to, or perhaps has already moved to… London. London, England…
The history in that part of the world is amazing, and history is still being made there.
The “Parliamentary road” can only be a part, and probably a minor part, of the social-national revolution, in my view.
More music
More tweets
I know what I should like to say about that but, were I to do so, I should probably have to endure, yet again, the boredom of dealing with woodentopped plods at my door, or at a police station.
More music
More tweets
[“Been a lot of debate about the Blair article. But strip away all the froth, and it boils down to three key arguments.
a) A quarter of a century after the Iraq War British foreign policy should still be based around the principle of always being prepared to pay the “Blood Price” to maintain our “special relationship” with the United States.
b) Britain needs to reintegrate with the EU. And it can do so by forcing its way back in on our terms. Europe needs us more than we need Europe.
c) Having seen whole regions and communities of working Britain hollowed out economically, socially and culturally by uncontrolled immigration the exercise should now be repeated via uncontrolled and unregulated automation.
It’s insanity. It’s not bold thinking. It’s not provocative thinking. It’s not challenging thinking. It’s absolute, copper bottomed lunacy.“]
Europe, including the UK, needs a massive chistka. It is coming anyway, whether we like it or not, and whether we prepare for it or not. The only question is whether we shall be the victors or the victims.
Barbarian hordes atop the ruins of the “City of Light”. Can anyone now doubt that the 1939-45 war ended disastrously for all the peoples of Europe?
The more aware and intelligent, and far-sighted, people in the West began to understand that even in the 1960s. I myself certainly did, even as a child of 11 (in 1967-1968).
Now, the younger part of the mainstream population, for example in the UK, is coming to the same conclusion.
“No-one can rule guiltlessly” [Saint-Just].
Talking point
When “they” have numbers and armed force, that is what happens. Look and learn.
Meanwhile, in Europe and elsewhere, other tactics are utilized:
See also:
More tweets
Ian Robert Millard 
Stand-Up to Racism are vile, anti-British, Marxist SCUM and obviously are so mentally ill and just plain thick with a capital T they do not do irony. Demonstrating in favour of anti-white racism
LikeLiked by 1 person
is utterly abhorent and SICK. I wonder if pro-Zionist, pro-Israel groups and individuals fund them? Historically, Zionists have often funded these kind of loony globalist open borders supporting organisations. Stand-Up for white genocide and anti-white racism will need to be re-educated in camps!
This loony group of the unwashed had a demonstration outside the German Embassy in Belgravia protesting against the rise of the nationalist/national-conservative AfD party a few months ago. Do they really think either the German Embassy staff or the German people care about their lunatic fringe views?
The Afd is not even the most ‘far right’ party in Germany. Die Heimat (The Homeland) and Der Dritte Weg (The Third Way) are much further to the Right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
John:
Quite likely, either directly or via cut-outs, as with the Jewish “antifascist” pressure group and fake charity, “Hope not Hate”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Does the so-called Hope Not Hate (really Dope NOT Soap) group support the ‘right’ of Zionist Jews to take over and ethnically cleanse the ancestral land of Palestinians of their country of Palestine which is currently occupied by the bandit/continual international law defying state of Israel?
If they do and are funded by Zionist Jews it just goes to show typical Zionist hypocrisy. I wonder where that phenonemon of ‘anti-semitism’ arises from? Can it just possibly be connected to gentile fury and annoyance at Zionist double standards by any chance?🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
LikeLike
You would have to be a crackpot quasi-Marxist lunatic like Dan Hodges (and is it not strange or perhaps not that cretin writes for a supposedly strongly Tory newspaper?) or a hugely naive/terminally dim witted/very bad judge of character to not know Bliar was always going to be an evil, globalist, virulently anti-British POS as PM.
I worked it out as soon as he became Labour Party leader. What did people think so-called New Labour was going to be all about after Bliar ditched the party’s former commitment to socialism by getting rid of Clause 4? Without a formal adherence to socialism it should have been obvious the party would basically continue the economic neo-liberalism of the Tories whilst doubling down on Labour’s social liberalism ie open borders ect in order to distinguish itself from the Conservatives.
LikeLike
John:
Well, I agree, though when Blair became PM, I was living overseas (Almaty, Kazakhstan).
Socialism, in all forms, died in most countries around 1989. Labour’s ditching of Clause 4 was the UK aspect of that, or the flagging of that. Labour ditched any pretence at being “socialist”, and became social-democratic (ostensibly), later ditching even that. Now, Lab and Con are, to a large extent, indistinguishable in real policy terms. Just labels. Labour Friends of Israel v. Conservative Friends of Israel.
LikeLike
If only the Tories had diitched ineffectual and devoid of charisma liberal John Major in 1995, got themselves a better leader like Michael Portillo and pushed that excellent ‘New Labour, New Danger’ advertising campaign and strapline. Idiot John Major canned it!🙄🙄🙄🙄🤬🤬🤬😡😡😡
LikeLike
John:
Portillo is at least educated and quite intelligent, but against that, he was Chair of Conservative Friends of Israel…
I like Portillo’s train journey films, but he always tries to find an excuse to bring in Jewish things such as ancient synagogues, or the alleged behaviour of German forces in the early to mid 1940s.
LikeLike
I hope to see the day when Bliar is charged with high treason against this country, found guilty and then given an execution via hanging (the traditional British punishment for treason) for what he done to this country.
LikeLike
What goes around comes around.
https://x.com/SnowHimbo/status/2060877544950288487?s=20
LikeLike