Afternoon music
A thought out of season
I was just thinking about the Henry Nowak matter. I myself live only about 20 miles from that part of Southampton, though in a very different semi-rural area.
I was also thinking about the Belfast protests or small riots.
The Southampton protests seen on TV and online seem to have involved 50-100 people, I doubt many more. I suspect that either a high minority, or a majority, of people generally are angry or at least concerned by wider aspects of the Henry Nowak case, also the wider aspects of the appalling savagery of the Belfast incident, as well as the incidents themselves, yet all we can see, on the surface, talking about Southampton, is 50 or 100 people (did the crowd ever amount to as many as 150?) confronting and —pointlessly— taunting a police contingent which also seems to have been in the dozens or maybe 100-150 in number.
Southampton itself has a population of about a quarter of a million people. You cannot judge the public mood by the few willing to get involved in street stand-offs (I do not think we can call them “battles”), whether in Southampton, Belfast, or anywhere else. You cannot say that, just because only a couple of hundred people turn out for a street protest in a city with 250,000 inhabitants, that that represents an otherwise-quiescent public. Not at all.
People are getting very apprehensive/concerned/angry about the present migration invasion and its consequences.
Tweets seen
Our animal friends.
Thus making Labour strong favourite to win the by-election. On the surface, bad news, in that it strengthens Labour, whose national vote (however stupidly) may rise if Burnham takes over from Starmer-stein.
On the other hand, looking at the bigger picture, it means that well over a third of the people —37%— of that Makerfield area (a traditional Labour area) are now thinking in terms of nationalist politics, though not so many thinking yet in terms of social nationalism; more than are thinking of voting Labour, anyway —only 35%.
The direction of travel is toward national and even social-national politics, and away from the traditional System parties.
In any case, voting “democracy” is only part of the story. All roads lead to Rome, and only white Europeans should be allowed to vote in this country.
See also:
Look at the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union and, indeed, post-Soviet Russia. Dozens if not hundreds of ethnic groups and languages. Kept together by the knut, one way or another. To the extent that Russia has “democracy”, it is because the Russians constitute the large majority.
USA? Well, until the Second World War, the USA was large-majority white European, indeed —at one time just after the First World War— about 90% white European, albeit with a number of minority European cultures (and also a strong Jewish element in a few cities, but mainly in New York). Now, whites are just about the minority, maybe 48%, and look at how dictatorial the USA has already become.
UK? You decide…
Seems that the police in the county have appealed for information as to the identity of the nasty person who killed a seagull in St. Ives today. It may or may not be the person identified in the above tweet. The sweatshirt certainly looks very distinctive.
A silly little man, a Labourite political careerist, who had no background at all in defence until appointed by Starmer-stein. Ludicrously pro-“Ukraine” (Kiev regime), too. Incidentally, Healey has always been a member of Labour Friends of Israel. What a surprise…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Healey
Very true, though a few of the examples cited are ill-judged. For example, that Linehan slug joined in several times with the Jewish-lobby attacks on me after I was both wrongfully and unlawfully disbarred in 2016. Linehan is a complete tool of the Israel/Jew lobby, a nasty person through and through.
Like others (e.g. Allison Pearson, Toby Young etc), Linehan pretends to be for “free speech”, but in reality favours the “cancellation” and censorship of whomsoever is hated by the Jewish lobby.
Of course, both Linehan and Allison Pearson are within the msm milieu, so their incomes (I presume that Linehan still has an income of some sort) are dependent on not being targeted by the Jewish lobby; dimwitted Allison Pearson has even made common cause with the malicious liars and perjurers of the so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism”, the main activity of which is to whine and demand for less “free speech”.
Talking point
Saw that the following blog post from over 9 years ago, so one of the first, has had hits. I can still stand by it:
More tweets
[“The government said the Online Safety Act was about protecting children. We were called conspiracy theorists for saying it wasn’t!
Well er … Ofcom is writing to platforms about “crisis situations”, civil unrest and enhanced moderation measures. (Blocking posts they don’t like)
Children aren’t mentioned once. NOT ONCE.
The problem isn’t removing genuine incitement to violence. The real problem is that unelected regulators will pressure platforms to decide what millions of ADULTS can and cannot see whenever a “crisis” is declared.
many platforms will remove perfectly lawful content rather than risk the punishment of Ofcom.
Read the letter for yourself. Link in the thread.]”
The cartoon below was about that sort of situation in the USA, but fits perfectly with the repression of online freedom in the UK:
[“Bloody hell, I’ve been digging more into the government definition of ‘Crisis’ a bit more So… an unelected regulator is now operating within government where the meaning of “crisis” has become very stretched.
The Cabinet Office Amber Book says an emergency under the Civil Contingencies Act covers serious damage to human welfare, the environment or UK security. (fair enough) But then it has added … “For the purposes of this guidance, the terms emergency and crisis are used interchangeably.”… INTERCHANGEABLY?
It also says an emergency/crisis can include situations that have not yet been harmful but have the potential to be (they do not define ‘harmful’ This guidance has not been voted for or debated So let me explain why thats so important. it means that almost any situation the government believes could become a problem can now be treated as a ‘crisis’.
And under that broad language, Ofcom has been able to write to platforms about civil unrest, crisis situations and how they will need to beef up moderation, it isnt just about removing illegal content.
Anything could become a “crisis”, no one voted for the widening of the definition and no one had the opportunity to, because thats how government by guidance works…. hoping you won’t even notice.“]
The “Covid” scamdemic/panicdemic was the template.
[“Oh lookie here…. And now the pincer movement. The government wants …
A NATIONAL COUNTER DISINFORMATION CENTRE!
The foreign affairs committee says it’s about protecting against foreign interference (sensible) But …
the recommendations include cross-government coordination and closer working with private organisations and expanded powers to tackle ‘harmful’ narratives.
Who decides what counts as “disinformation”? Well erm … government regulators and approved experts will decide which narratives are acceptable.
The greatest threat to democracy is not the public discourse. It’s the state deciding what discourse is permitted.
Read my book!“]
The BBC has led the way, with a “BBC Verification” department which is itself actually just a System disinformation-broadcasting department.
Ian Robert Millard 
John Healey is a total moron even by the usual pathetically low Labour standards. A ‘Defence’ Secretary who had an obsession with the so-called ‘danger’ of Putin’s Russia when that country has failed in a big way to subdue Ukraine after FOUR years of fighting yet Putin is said to want to conquer the whole of Western Europe including us!🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
He also thought it would be a good idea to give away the entire Chagos Islands whilst leasing back an island we already own outright ie Diego Garcia for a pathetic short space of time ie 99 years (some people in America get longer prison terms than that) and paying the mainly Indian Hindu government of Mauritus billions of our taxpayers money for the privalege.
All this when it is abundantly clear the Mauritian government has NO real valid claim to the islands (the Seychelles and particularly The Maldives have better ones), no interest in the islands or the Chagossian people and all their spurious claim of sovereignty is about is to thumb their noses up at the former colonial power (they clearly do not like us as they became a Republic just 24 years after independence) and attempt to get billions of pounds from us to pay for tax cuts and economic development at home.
As the government there and most of the population are comprised of mainly Indian descended people it is clear their claim to the islands was just a massive grifting operation. Indians are amongst the world’s most utterly shameless grifters perhaps the world’s worst. Even Talmud Tommy Ten Names Columbian Marching Powder Rubinstein can’t out do them!
Besides which their sovereignty claim was baseless in another sense in that upon independence in 1968 they promised us they would NOT pursue one over the Chagos Islands.
As ever for a Third World country they broke their promise. To my mind, the only non-white countries in the world who can be trusted to keep their word over treaties, international agreements ect are Japan, South Korea and perhaps Taiwan.
Mainland China can’t eg their breaking of the Sino-British Joint Declaration on Hong Kong.
Any decent, pro-British government would firmly tell Mauritius to kindly eff off and stop their embarrasing grift operation against us.
LikeLike
A proper Defence Secretary would defend our sovereignty over the entire Chagos Islands for ALL time. Also, such a person would tell the cretinous Home Secretary to defend our borders. If we can’t defend Dover then what is the point in having armed forces or that useless, very expensive, so-called nuclear deterrent which failed to fire properly the last time it was tested!🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄😡😡😡🤬🤬
LikeLike
John:
Why does the UK need those little islands? We once had thousands but were a global empire then. The base there is really American. Britain needs to focus on its own part of the world.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The base is BOTH British and American. It is useful for US, British and, in general, Western security against untrustworthy countries like China and India.
Most importantly, it is the homeland of the Chagossian people so handing it over to another state like what was proposed whose people are mainly of Indian descent (Chagossians are of African origin) which they have nothing in common with and whose people mistreated them when the British government under Wilson unjustly deported them to Mauritius without asking for their consent is not an appropriate course of action.
Most Chagossians wish to live under our sovereignty so let them.
LikeLike
John:
Britain needs no base in the Indian Ocean against China or India, firstly because those states are a long long way away from us and, secondly, because the UK has no power at all to influence, and certainly not to damage them, and certainly not via some far-flung air base.
LikeLike
So even the party that should have as one of their prime aims the defence of civil liberties the Lib Dems have now jumped aboard the typically Labour and fake Conservative Party aim of censoring the Internet even more that it has already been due to the moronic Tories and idiots like Nadine Dorries and Priti Damm Useless and their Online Safety Act.
WHAT the hell is the point of the Lib Dems? They even manage to ruin their party’s best policy of all ie the introduction of Proportional Representation by arguing for the impractical for the UK (because of the size of constituencies it would need to use), overly complicated, ranked ballot using (we voted AGAINST the concept of preferential voting in the AV referendum of 2011) semi-proportional Single Transferable Vote (STV) method of PR as they use in only TWO countries for their lower houses of parliament ie the micro state of Malta and the Republic of Ireland.
Instead, the Lib Dems should argue for Mixed-Member PR as Germany and New Zealand use or wholly ‘Open List’ Party List PR as Finland has.
https://www.makevotesmatter.org.uk
LikeLike
Ed Davey is a silly little man. Whilst I rarely, if ever, agreed with him Paddy Ashdown was a pretty good leader for them. I wonder if the German-origin female MP for Bath would make for a better leader? I would be interested to know her thoughts on the LIb Dem obsession with the STV form of Proportional Representation. As a lady originally from Germany, I wonder if she thinks this obsession is barmy and a switch by her party to supporting the German and New Zealand version of PR would be a better Lib Dem policy.
LikeLike
Ed Davey and particularly the Labour and Green Party cretins in the House of Treason are probably very envious of Elon Musk’s admittedly ultra-obscene fortune which looks like soon making him the world’s first Trillionaire.
What is worse for a globalist open borders supporting lunatic? A ‘Nazi’, ‘fascist’, ‘racist’ or a very, very, very RICH ‘Nazi’, ‘fascist’, ‘racist’ like Elon Reeve Musk? 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍👍🤣🤣🤣😅😅👍👍👍👍
LikeLike
I think that Labour Party poll is inaccurate. I very much doubt the Lib Dems, little Kemi Odegoke Unbongo Unbongo’s very exotic fake Conservatives, the Greens and the other candidates will get the kind of vote share between them that poll indicates.
LikeLike
How exactly does Multi Tier Kweer (Ukranian Rent Boys loving) Starmer the evil Israel loving, Britain and the British hating, Grade A, effectively unelected, CUNT (as several very nice T shirts on sale on the internet rightly call the useless tosser) plan to crack down on a company owned by a person who is so ultra-rich he might be the world’s first TRILLIONAIRE soon and which, importantly, is based in a FOREIGN country 3,000 miles away from here?🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
LikeLike
Alison Pearson is a weird little bitch even for someone who ‘earns’ vast amounts for scribbinng gormless crap for what was once a respectable Tory newspaper but has now degenerated under GERMAN ownership into being an embarrasing mouthpiece for the regime in Tel Aviv.
So strongly Zionist and pro-Israeli is the Daily Tel Aviv O Graph that even actual ISRAELI newspapers The Jerusalem Post and Haaretz are more often critical of the government of the Zionist state and Benjamin Netanhayu.
I do not doubt that many Germans are ashamed of the Holocaust but do they REALLY have to go around buying-up British newspapers and then turning them into fanatical Zionist, Pro-Israel ‘newspapers’ to try and make-up for Germany’s national shame?
Please, Germany, keep your national guilt complex at home.
LikeLike