Tag Archives: data centres

Diary Blog, 10 August 2026

Morning music

[“Sweet Thames” at Newbridge, Oxfordshire; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Bridge,_River_Thames]

Morning thought

Heard some idiotic woman from a quango on BBC Radio 3 news while driving. Blaming “climate change” for Britain running short of water. No mention of the fact that “we” (the System authorities) are importing about a million unwanted blacks and browns every year, some of which are breeding. Might that not have something to do with the water shortage? (he asked, rhetorically…).

Tweets seen

Our animal friends.

Our animal friends.

[“The Fuhrer as friend of animals“]

Our animal friends.

The use of the outdated “right”/”left” labels is just not useful these days.

There is at least an arguable position that what might be called “World Jewry” has a long-term plan to use Argentina as a kind of bolthole or secure base while war (nuclear war), and famine ravage much of the rest of the world, war and famine which the Zionists themselves are doing much to bring about (Ukraine, Iran, Middle East/Mediterranean).

Conspiracy theory? Possibly, but then look how many of those “conspiracy theories” have proven to be accurate analyses in recent decades.

In many ways, Galloway is a clever man, but in some ways he is stupid and hopelessly —indeed wilfully— ignorant. Hitler and National Socialism (and the crimes of Stalin and the CPSU) are blind spots for him.

A grade-A “grifter” too, of course.

Galloway tweeted against me a couple of times many years ago.

[“The ‘vetting process’ of populist parties exists to screen out people who are simultaneously intelligent AND honest. Honest idiots can be tolerated because they are easy to manipulate. And intelligent psychopaths can too, because they will agree with the corruption.

But honest and intelligent people are poison for them.”]

Once again, well-said by Yerbury. I myself have made the same points often, on the blog, on Twitter (before a pack of Jews had me expelled in 2018), and elsewhere, over the years.

I recall an old friend, now-deceased, saying to me and a couple of others in the 1980s about how “any one of us could be an MP for any of the [then] three main parties, were we willing to sell our principles for a career, and to tolerate the bullshit”. Very true.

Basically, just a horrible tribe.

Still, what goes around comes around…

Just a horrible tribe, as said previously.

Typical. There have been, over the years, thousands of such faked “antisemitic” attacks, including quite a few in the UK. A Jew lawyer in Scotland —Glasgow, I believe— was convicted some years ago of faking “antisemitic” attacks; unfortunately, his sentence was far too lenient. I think that he was even allowed to continue working as a solicitor.

Par for the course. Look at “Mark Lewis Lawyer” and his cronies, a whole pack of dishonest Jew lawyers. Lewis has more than once cheated his own clients, and has contrived a number of fake “antisemitic” incidents over the years, both for Zionist propaganda purposes and to make money for himself, his present wife, and others. He’s a criminal.

[“Pastor Mitri Raheb has warned that, if current conditions continue, the Palestinian Christian presence in the West Bank could disappear by 2050, amid worsening economic conditions, escalating settler violence, and growing restrictions and military checkpoints. According to Raheb, more than 200 Christian families have left the West Bank since the outbreak of the war in Gaza, while church leaders report that thoughts of emigration are becoming increasingly common, particularly among young people.

These concerns are especially evident in Taybeh, east of Ramallah, the last entirely Christian town in the West Bank. Churches have documented the departure of more than 15 families since October 2023, alongside attacks targeting the town’s lands and residents’ property, as well as its holy sites.

While the Christian population in the West Bank is currently estimated at between 40,000 and 45,000, their share has fallen from 6% in 1967 to just over 1% today. Warnings are growing that continued emigration threatens the presence of the “living stones” in a land to which they have been connected for two thousand years.”]

Devils.

Blast from past

I wrote the following words in July 2024:

“Regular readers will know that I have blogged recently about the fact that Starmer-Labour has no real mandate. The electoral system of the UK has been broken beyond easy repair.

At GE 2024, out of every 20 people eligible to vote, and in very rough terms, 8 did not vote at all, 4 voted Labour, 3 voted Conservative, 2 voted Reform UK, 2 voted LibDem, and 1 voted Green.

That is Starmer’s and Labour’s mandate— 4 out of 20. For pedants, arguably, 4 out of 12. Not much of a mandate either way.

[IanRobertMillard.org blog: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2024/07/28/diary-blog-28-july-2024/]

In retrospect, plainly correct, if I myself say so; the point, though, is that, if that was Starmer-stein’s very inadequate mandate, how much less of a mandate does Andy Burnham have?

Andy Burnham has no real legitimacy at all.

More tweets

Burnham and his clown Cabinet are planning to send even more arms and cash to the Kiev regime.

After only three weeks, Burnham already looks well out of his depth, though his quasi-electioneering has resulted in a limited “Burnham bounce” in the opinion polls.

An interview with Nick Griffin

https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/a-volcano-ready-to-explode-war-civilisation

Well worth seeing/reading.

Late tweets seen

I should think that a hung Parliament is quite likely, on present polling. Labour will fall back, the Con Party stay back, while Reform looks to have shot its bolt by being too pro-Israel, pro-Jewish lobby, by failing to be truly hardline on migration invasion, and by being far too sleazy as well. Still, Reform will get votes by not being LibLabCon; a default choice, if you like. Restore? Slightly better, ideologically, than Reform —but not much— and even more of a one-man-band than Reform. Greens? Hard to say. Will its odd alliance of “antifascist” oddities and pro-Islamist Muslims last? Maybe, maybe not.

[“If you enjoyed the Autochrome of artist Claude Monet, which I shared with you in June, you may be interested to learn that I’ve found this new one of the great man, taken in 1917 by Étienne Clémentel in Monet’s garden at Giverny.
I’ve given it a good clean-up for you! I have to say: for an artist renowned for his use of colour, he is dressed surprisingly drably! Nevertheless, this is a very rare colour shot of the great man. It was taken using an early colour glass-plate process and isn’t colourised.
“]

Late music

Diary Blog, 24 July 2026

Afternoon music

Stray thought

Was just reading the Daily Telegraph obit of once-famous newspaper editor Donald Trelford: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/obituaries/2023/01/27/donald-trelford-obituary-editor-observer-fleet-street-lonrho/.

What struck me as much as anything is that, in 1966, Trelford bought a 4-bedroomed house at Kew (presumably detached) for £6,000. That is somewhere between £120,000-£130,000 in the money of 2026. How much is a 4-bed house in Kew today? Between £1.3M and £2.5M [https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/87831852#/?channel=RES_BUY]. The real-terms inflation in residential property values continues to amaze (and appal).

Tweets seen

Dr. Aladwan’s crowdfunder: https://chuffed.org/project/dr-rahmeh-vs-the-lobby-and-the-state.

Someone is about to have a bad day…

Those fake states in the Gulf are just an historical anomaly. It would be better if the region were ruled by a supervening imperium (so long as it is not Israeli).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piddington,_Oxfordshire

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piddington,_Oxfordshire#Independence_referendum

Oxfordshire or, once the invasion has happened, Oxfordshite.

The invaders are being facilitated in their invasion by System MPs, mainstream media, and other traitors.

Social-national ethnostate. Nothing else will do.

Late tweets

What a huge surprise…

One of the untermenschen living here in what should be a white European country.

Wall. Squad. End.

He says one thing one day, the opposite the next day. Farcical. Demeaning.

Late music

Diary Blog, 11 June 2026

Afternoon music

[painting by Serge Marshennikov]

A thought out of season

I was just thinking about the Henry Nowak matter. I myself live only about 20 miles from that part of Southampton, though in a very different semi-rural area.

I was also thinking about the Belfast protests or small riots.

The Southampton protests seen on TV and online seem to have involved 50-100 people, I doubt many more. I suspect that either a high minority, or a majority, of people generally are angry or at least concerned by wider aspects of the Henry Nowak case, also the wider aspects of the appalling savagery of the Belfast incident, as well as the incidents themselves, yet all we can see, on the surface, talking about Southampton, is 50 or 100 people (did the crowd ever amount to as many as 150?) confronting and —pointlessly— taunting a police contingent which also seems to have been in the dozens or maybe 100-150 in number.

Southampton itself has a population of about a quarter of a million people. You cannot judge the public mood by the few willing to get involved in street stand-offs (I do not think we can call them “battles”), whether in Southampton, Belfast, or anywhere else. You cannot say that, just because only a couple of hundred people turn out for a street protest in a city with 250,000 inhabitants, that that represents an otherwise-quiescent public. Not at all.

People are getting very apprehensive/concerned/angry about the present migration invasion and its consequences.

Tweets seen

Our animal friends.

Thus making Labour strong favourite to win the by-election. On the surface, bad news, in that it strengthens Labour, whose national vote (however stupidly) may rise if Burnham takes over from Starmer-stein.

On the other hand, looking at the bigger picture, it means that well over a third of the people —37%— of that Makerfield area (a traditional Labour area) are now thinking in terms of nationalist politics, though not so many thinking yet in terms of social nationalism; more than are thinking of voting Labour, anyway —only 35%.

The direction of travel is toward national and even social-national politics, and away from the traditional System parties.

In any case, voting “democracy” is only part of the story. All roads lead to Rome, and only white Europeans should be allowed to vote in this country.

See also:

Look at the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union and, indeed, post-Soviet Russia. Dozens if not hundreds of ethnic groups and languages. Kept together by the knut, one way or another. To the extent that Russia has “democracy”, it is because the Russians constitute the large majority.

USA? Well, until the Second World War, the USA was large-majority white European, indeed —at one time just after the First World War— about 90% white European, albeit with a number of minority European cultures (and also a strong Jewish element in a few cities, but mainly in New York). Now, whites are just about the minority, maybe 48%, and look at how dictatorial the USA has already become.

UK? You decide…

Seems that the police in the county have appealed for information as to the identity of the nasty person who killed a seagull in St. Ives today. It may or may not be the person identified in the above tweet. The sweatshirt certainly looks very distinctive.

A silly little man, a Labourite political careerist, who had no background at all in defence until appointed by Starmer-stein. Ludicrously pro-“Ukraine” (Kiev regime), too. Incidentally, Healey has always been a member of Labour Friends of Israel. What a surprise…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Healey

Very true, though a few of the examples cited are ill-judged. For example, that Linehan slug joined in several times with the Jewish-lobby attacks on me after I was both wrongfully and unlawfully disbarred in 2016. Linehan is a complete tool of the Israel/Jew lobby, a nasty person through and through.

Like others (e.g. Allison Pearson, Toby Young etc), Linehan pretends to be for “free speech”, but in reality favours the “cancellation” and censorship of whomsoever is hated by the Jewish lobby.

Of course, both Linehan and Allison Pearson are within the msm milieu, so their incomes (I presume that Linehan still has an income of some sort) are dependent on not being targeted by the Jewish lobby; dimwitted Allison Pearson has even made common cause with the malicious liars and perjurers of the so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism”, the main activity of which is to whine and demand for less “free speech”.

Talking point

Saw that the following blog post from over 9 years ago, so one of the first, has had hits. I can still stand by it:

More tweets

[“The government said the Online Safety Act was about protecting children. We were called conspiracy theorists for saying it wasn’t!

Well er … Ofcom is writing to platforms about “crisis situations”, civil unrest and enhanced moderation measures. (Blocking posts they don’t like)

Children aren’t mentioned once. NOT ONCE.

The problem isn’t removing genuine incitement to violence. The real problem is that unelected regulators will pressure platforms to decide what millions of ADULTS can and cannot see whenever a “crisis” is declared.

many platforms will remove perfectly lawful content rather than risk the punishment of Ofcom.

Read the letter for yourself. Link in the thread.]”

The cartoon below was about that sort of situation in the USA, but fits perfectly with the repression of online freedom in the UK:

[“Bloody hell, I’ve been digging more into the government definition of ‘Crisis’ a bit more So… an unelected regulator is now operating within government where the meaning of “crisis” has become very stretched.

The Cabinet Office Amber Book says an emergency under the Civil Contingencies Act covers serious damage to human welfare, the environment or UK security. (fair enough) But then it has added … “For the purposes of this guidance, the terms emergency and crisis are used interchangeably.”… INTERCHANGEABLY?

It also says an emergency/crisis can include situations that have not yet been harmful but have the potential to be (they do not define ‘harmful’ This guidance has not been voted for or debated So let me explain why thats so important. it means that almost any situation the government believes could become a problem can now be treated as a ‘crisis’.

And under that broad language, Ofcom has been able to write to platforms about civil unrest, crisis situations and how they will need to beef up moderation, it isnt just about removing illegal content.

Anything could become a “crisis”, no one voted for the widening of the definition and no one had the opportunity to, because thats how government by guidance works…. hoping you won’t even notice.“]

The “Covid” scamdemic/panicdemic was the template.

[“Oh lookie here…. And now the pincer movement. The government wants …

A NATIONAL COUNTER DISINFORMATION CENTRE!

The foreign affairs committee says it’s about protecting against foreign interference (sensible) But …

the recommendations include cross-government coordination and closer working with private organisations and expanded powers to tackle ‘harmful’ narratives.

Who decides what counts as “disinformation”? Well erm … government regulators and approved experts will decide which narratives are acceptable.

The greatest threat to democracy is not the public discourse. It’s the state deciding what discourse is permitted.

Read my book!“]

The BBC has led the way, with a “BBC Verification” department which is itself actually just a System disinformation-broadcasting department.

Late tweets

Translates to a Commons with about 311 Reform UK MPs (about 15 short of an overall majority), 85 Cons (very weak official Opposition), 83 Greens, 67 LibDems, 45 SNP, 32 Labour [etc].

Those figures would mean that about 370 current Labour MPs would lose their seats, including Starmer and, notionally, any Labour MP at Makerfield.

31 current Conservative Party MPs would also lose their seats.

I think that the polling organizations are going to have to place Restore on the board, because the absence of Restore obviously skews the suggested results in terms of seats notionally won at the next GE.

To my mind, with the present System people in place, almost any money spent on defence is wasted, much of the background policy being predicated on the nation that Russia wants to or even intends to invade Eastern or Central Europe, or even Western Europe, and maybe even the UK. It’s all nonsense.

This country should not be wasting money on supporting “Ukraine” (the corrupt, brutal, and shambolic Jew-Zionist/Ukrainian thug regime in Kiev); neither should any money at all be spent on assisting the vicious Israeli regime.

As for those political parasites and chancers such as Daniel Hannan, suggesting that both State pension benefits such as the Triple Lock, and disability benefits for British people, should be slashed and the monies diverted to “defence”, forget it! Crazy, as well as being political suicide for any party entertaining it.

A million migrant-invaders are coming into the UK every year; others are being born here… Our country is quite rapidly now falling to pieces by reason, mainly, of migration invasion. Stop that, rather than building fantasy armies and navies to be deployed in fantasy scenarios about fighting Russia (and its 7,000 nuclear weapons).

On the contrary, Britain should leave NATO and cultivate good relations with Russia, thus ensuring cheap energy for our industries and domestic consumers, and also giving the UK a huge and valuable market in Russia, a market currently closed to the EU states by reason of their mad anti-Russia sanctions regime. It could all be ours.

…and a member, of course, of Labour Friends of Israel.

Like most former officers who become MPs, Jarvis has proven to be a big disappointment in every way (cf. Johnny Mercer— remember him?).

Ah, another resignation. Al Carns looks good on paper (i.e. his background), but I reserve “judgment” (assessment) until more is known.

Seems to be pro the Kiev regime, so I am not too hopeful, but we shall see.

Wall. Squad. End.

Again more villages or hamlets. Russia needs a gamechanger in Ukraine.

A proper social-national government would change course, radically.

Our animal friends.

Late music

Diary Blog, 9 June 2026

Morning music

Tweets seen

The pages of history are turning.

Talking point

[“THE DOSSIER #8: Andy Burnham MP – The Corpse of the North

Born Liverpool 1970. Father a BT engineer. Mother a GP receptionist. Then Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge. The elite’s finishing school. You have never worked outside politics. Not one day. Researcher for Tessa Jowell. MP for Leigh 2001-2017. Secretary of State for Health.

You failed at every level. You failed upward. You always do. You lost your seat in 2017. The working-class town rejected you. The “man of the people” too posh for his own people. Now Mayor of Greater Manchester. The “King of the North.” The man who would be Prime Minister. You want the Labour leadership? You have tried twice. 2010. You came fourth. Eliminated with ten percent. 2015.

You launched your bid in an accountancy firm linked to tax avoidance. You attacked the mansion tax as “spiteful.” You abstained on Tory benefit cuts. You lost to Jeremy Corbyn. You cannot even win your own party.

You slammed “indefensible” waste on NHS consultants in opposition. Then you tripled spending to £27 million per year as Mayor.

While working-class girls were raped, tortured, murdered. While they were called prostitutes by the authorities you controlled. While they begged for help. You spent millions on consultants. You lent public money to a property tycoon. No full checks. He built luxury apartments. Working-class families slept on streets. You promised to end such arrangements. You lied. You always lie.

But here is your extinction. Here is what ends you forever. Mid Staffordshire. You were Health Secretary when the scandal broke. Hundreds dead. Patients drinking water from vases. Left unwashed in their own filth. You resisted a full public inquiry. You delayed. You obfuscated. Whistleblower Julie Bailey called you “grossly unsuitable.” She said you were “incompetent or negligent.” The Francis Report exposed the rot on your watch.

Maggie Oliver. The whistleblower who exposed the Rochdale grooming gangs. She came to you. She warned you. She gave you the evidence. Industrial-scale rape. Torture. Trafficking. Working-class girls, twelve years old, called prostitutes by Greater Manchester Police. Raped repeatedly. Tortured. Murdered. Their families ignored. Evidence destroyed. Complaints buried. Maggie Oliver said you “turned away” from victims. She said you “did not grasp the nettle.” She resigned over your handling of the Oldham inquiry. You had the evidence. You had the warnings. You did nothing. The girls suffered. The girls died.

You were Mayor. Under your watch, Greater Manchester Police abandoned one in five reported offences. Domestic abuse victims. Working-class women. No investigations. No safeguarding. No justice. They called for help. You were too busy being King. Too busy planning your PM bid. Too busy spending £27 million on consultants while children were raped.

You preach about the NHS while your Labour government started the privatization. Section 75. Competitive tendering. The market devouring public health. You built the machine you now pretend to oppose.

The hypocrisy is surgical. You want to be Prime Minister. Labour blocked your MP bid. You called it “an insult to people’s intelligence.” The insult, Andy, is you. The Cambridge-educated “man of the people” who failed the people. The King of the North who could not protect the North’s daughters. Who turned away. Who did nothing. Who spent millions on consultants while children were raped.

You have no seat. No hiding place. No sanctuary. You gambled that we would forget the girls called prostitutes while they suffered. You gambled that time would erase your cowardice. You lost. You are not a king. You are a caretaker of carnage. You are not a leader. You are a liability. You are not the future of Labour. You are its shame. You are its corpse. Your reputation is ash. Your conscience is a void. Your ambition is grotesque. Your career is over. Your betrayal of Britain is now complete. Permanent exile awaits. Congratulations. You are The Dossier.”]

An excoriating polemic.

Is this really someone the people of Makerfield want as their MP? Or as Prime Minister? I would have thought not.

I was actually unaware that Burnham started off, if that is correct, as “gopher” to freeloading/corrupt Blairite MP, Labour Friends of Israel member and, effectively, agent of influence for Israel, Tessa Jowell.

Incidentally, Tessa Jowell, now deceased, was also the minister responsible for the Communications Act 2003, under the appalling s.127 of which many people —including me— have been targeted by the Jewish/Israel lobby.

Seems to me that Burnham is being pushed and promoted by the (((msm))), and that is always a bad sign, as we have seen in the past, e.g. with Stermer-stein, “Boris”-idiot etc.

Burnham has nothing in the tank. Nothing new, and nothing interesting. A typical Blair-Brown era machine-Labour political careerist.

More tweets

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkady_Volozh

Britain has to be cleaned out. The whole Western world needs to be cleaned out.

Translates to a Commons with about 300 Reform UK MPs (about 26 short of an overall majority), 88 Cons (very weak official Opposition, but this is the first time for quite a while that the Cons have come second in the opinion polling), 64 LibDems and 64 Greens, 60 Lab, and 45 SNP [etc].

Restore Britain are still not yet on most of the polling questionnaires. If they were, that would make a difference even were they to reach only 5%-10%; a recent poll in Makerfield had them on 19% in that part of the world.

Very open, overall, but it is clear that people want a real change from the same-old, and LibLabCon cannot provide that, even if (in my view, especially if) Andy Burnham takes over Labour.

Incidentally, on those figures, were Reform able to climb from 25% to 27%, that alone would give them a small overall Commons majority.

Also incidentally, I see tweets from a couple of loonie women to the effect that Yvette Cooper would transform Labour Party fortunes were she to become leader. Hardy-ha-ha. I very much doubt it.

For one thing, Yvette Cooper and her husband, Ed Balls, were both fraudsters and expenses cheats prior to 2010, and were exposed as such even if never prosecuted. Yes, over 15 years ago now, but it goes to character. She is still moneygrasping and moneygrubbing.

Also, Yvette Cooper is a died-in-the-wool pro-Jewish lobby and pro-Israel drone, completely under “their” thumb. She is also pro-migration invasion and the hopeless and degraded multikulti society. A would-be dictator and total careerist; power-mad, and bitter towards those standing up for Europe’s, including Britain’s, future.

Nein danke.

Until I saw those tweets, I was unaware that yet another “chimp-out” of some kind had occurred in the UK.

Don’t forget which “community” is, at root, behind the causes of all that, such as the importation into Europe of vast numbers of non-Europeans.

Look below the surface of events.

Talking point

I happened to see a blog post from well over 6 years ago, and which has had a few recent hits. The issues raised in 2019 are, most of them, still almost exactly the same as they now are:

More tweets seen

I think we have to start to understand, as a people, that quite a number of MPs, “journalist” scribblers, TV and radio talking-heads etc, are actually traitors; traitors to us, to our future as a people. Not just as a label, or as a word to put in a tweet, but in a real sense.

The Hilary Benn type of System politicians are enemies of this country, while sitting in a privileged position within it. Benn himself is, of course, the son of now-deceased idiot-“socialist” Labour MP, Tony Benn, a total hypocrite, as well as being completely wrongheaded on almost (?) every issue.

[“A white man sent out 300 job applications with his real name — zero responses.
He changed his last name to “Singh” on his résumé — and suddenly got callbacks.
This is not a coincidence. This is anti-white discrimination, enabled by DEI policies that openly discriminate against native Europeans and Americans.
While politicians import millions from India and lecture us about “diversity,” qualified white applicants are passed over for less qualified foreigners who game the system.
Merit is dead. Tribalism has replaced it.
End DEI. Deport the invaders. Hire based on ability, not skin colour or foreign name.
“]

Same in the UK. Even those institutions and employers not infested or contaminated with “woke-ism” etc are afraid that, if they ignore the non-whites, they will be on the end of a “discrimination” suit before long.

Monkeyworld UK, brought to you by the Benns, the Blairs, the Gordon Browns, the David Cameron-Levitas and George Osbornes, the Theresa Mays, the Starmer-steins, the “Boris”-idiots, and the Ed Daveys (etc) of this world.

I am unable to add what I think should happen to the enemies of civilization and culture, because we no longer live in anything even approaching a “free country” (as people used to say, long ago), and having politically-correct poundland Stasi police employees at my door (as has happened several times over the past decade or so) is very very boring.

Jenrick is also corrupt, tied-in with Jewish property-speculators etc. He should have been prosecuted.

Also, Jenrick decided to intervene in favour of building the proposed ugly concrete “holocaust” propaganda centre by the Palace of Westminster (not yet built, thankfully), over-ruling all opposition from the local council, environmental groups, and patriotic groups.

Even some in academia are awakening.

The full tweet by David Betz:

[“It is pointless trying to understand the contemporary British media complex as ‘media’ in the conventional sense—journalism, reporting, or even opinion. The correct frame is propaganda: mood and sentiment management, with its sharpest tool today being crisis communications.

The dominant technique, visible daily if you still watch, is inversion—systematic reversal. It flips reality: victim into perpetrator, aggressor into defender, truth into falsehood, good into evil. It constructs Walter Lippmann’s ‘pseudo-environment’, an alternate reality in which the public is meant to dwell.

A key subtype is projection, or ‘accusation in a mirror’, neatly summarised by a Rwandan Hutu propagandist in a 1990s manual: impute to your enemies exactly what you and your own side are planning or doing.

When a genuine crisis erupts—such as the racially aggravated murder of Henry Nowak—the first imperative of the machine is to stall, dampen, and defeat the natural eruption of public outrage.

Call it ‘restoring calm’ if you like the euphemism. In practice, it means herding people back into anaesthetised normality so that inversion can resume.

Once the majority has been shamed, distracted, or bullied into silence, the remnant still angry can be ridiculed by the usual chorus—eye-rolling panellists on Have I Got News for You, columnists sneering at those ‘harping on’, and accusations of crypto-racism or worse.

Thus, the brutal stabbing of an unarmed 18-year-old student, the false cry of racism by his killer, and the police reportedly handcuffing the dying boy as he bled out on a Southampton street is repackaged as another ‘knife crime’ tragedy (note Shaban Mahmood’s flaccid parliamentary statement this afternoon)—preferably illustrated with a generic white face in the style of the BBC’s so-called reality-based drama ‘Adolescence’ or the more recent but equally putridly manipulative ‘The Capture’.

Real patterns (grooming gangs, crime disparities, two-tier policing) are airbrushed. This is projection at work: the actual sources of predation and institutional failure are recast, while legitimate grievance is pathologized.

The truth? The system enabled both the attack and the immediate inversion of its aftermath and that stands exposed to anyone with eyes and functioning brain by the video evidence. That’s the problem, your own ‘lying eyes’, that crisis communications has to handle before there can be a return to normal levels of public mood management can be restored.

This is precisely what Dan Hodges is performing when he labels people demanding we talk about the murder ‘scum’ for refusing to respect the family’s wish that their son’s death not be politicised. It is phase-one grunt work in the inversion protocol: shame the angry back into silence so the pseudo-environment can be restored.

Smart enough to know his role, malleable enough to perform it willingly—exactly as Noam Chomsky described the filtering process that keeps the right sort of voice prominent in the system.

The technique still works on some. But it is wearing thin. Every overplayed inversion, every scummy dismissal of raw public grief, prepares the ground for sharper identities and clearer grievances against the system itself. Normal people do not remain moderate forever when the machine insists their reality is the problem.“]

Exactly. One of the best expositions I have seen recently.

Late tweets

[“If a migrant comes to our country and attempts to saw a man’s head off in the street, a Restore Britain Government will not deport.

With the British people’s approval, that savage will be put to death.

But that is not enough – these atrocities will keep happening. The barbarians are already inside the gates.

Immigration will end from countries that are proven to supply us with these monsters.

Third world migrants who hate our way of life will be removed from our country. Restore Britain will deport millions.

I have had enough. The British people have had enough.

We do not have to live like this – there is another way.

Death penalty, mass deportations, end mass immigration.

That is what Restore Britain will do.“]

Late music

[Levitan, Evening Bells]