Afternoon music
A thought out of season
I was just thinking about the Henry Nowak matter. I myself live only about 20 miles from that part of Southampton, though in a very different semi-rural area.
I was also thinking about the Belfast protests or small riots.
The Southampton protests seen on TV and online seem to have involved 50-100 people, I doubt many more. I suspect that either a high minority, or a majority, of people generally are angry or at least concerned by wider aspects of the Henry Nowak case, also the wider aspects of the appalling savagery of the Belfast incident, as well as the incidents themselves, yet all we can see, on the surface, talking about Southampton, is 50 or 100 people (did the crowd ever amount to as many as 150?) confronting and —pointlessly— taunting a police contingent which also seems to have been in the dozens or maybe 100-150 in number.
Southampton itself has a population of about a quarter of a million people. You cannot judge the public mood by the few willing to get involved in street stand-offs (I do not think we can call them “battles”), whether in Southampton, Belfast, or anywhere else. You cannot say that, just because only a couple of hundred people turn out for a street protest in a city with 250,000 inhabitants, that that represents an otherwise-quiescent public. Not at all.
People are getting very apprehensive/concerned/angry about the present migration invasion and its consequences.
Tweets seen
Our animal friends.
Thus making Labour strong favourite to win the by-election. On the surface, bad news, in that it strengthens Labour, whose national vote (however stupidly) may rise if Burnham takes over from Starmer-stein.
On the other hand, looking at the bigger picture, it means that well over a third of the people —37%— of that Makerfield area (a traditional Labour area) are now thinking in terms of nationalist politics, though not so many thinking yet in terms of social nationalism; more than are thinking of voting Labour, anyway —only 35%.
The direction of travel is toward national and even social-national politics, and away from the traditional System parties.
In any case, voting “democracy” is only part of the story. All roads lead to Rome, and only white Europeans should be allowed to vote in this country.
See also:
Look at the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union and, indeed, post-Soviet Russia. Dozens if not hundreds of ethnic groups and languages. Kept together by the knut, one way or another. To the extent that Russia has “democracy”, it is because the Russians constitute the large majority.
USA? Well, until the Second World War, the USA was large-majority white European, indeed —at one time just after the First World War— about 90% white European, albeit with a number of minority European cultures (and also a strong Jewish element in a few cities, but mainly in New York). Now, whites are just about the minority, maybe 48%, and look at how dictatorial the USA has already become.
UK? You decide…
Seems that the police in the county have appealed for information as to the identity of the nasty person who killed a seagull in St. Ives today. It may or may not be the person identified in the above tweet. The sweatshirt certainly looks very distinctive.
A silly little man, a Labourite political careerist, who had no background at all in defence until appointed by Starmer-stein. Ludicrously pro-“Ukraine” (Kiev regime), too. Incidentally, Healey has always been a member of Labour Friends of Israel. What a surprise…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Healey
Very true, though a few of the examples cited are ill-judged. For example, that Linehan slug joined in several times with the Jewish-lobby attacks on me after I was both wrongfully and unlawfully disbarred in 2016. Linehan is a complete tool of the Israel/Jew lobby, a nasty person through and through.
Like others (e.g. Allison Pearson, Toby Young etc), Linehan pretends to be for “free speech”, but in reality favours the “cancellation” and censorship of whomsoever is hated by the Jewish lobby.
Of course, both Linehan and Allison Pearson are within the msm milieu, so their incomes (I presume that Linehan still has an income of some sort) are dependent on not being targeted by the Jewish lobby; dimwitted Allison Pearson has even made common cause with the malicious liars and perjurers of the so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism”, the main activity of which is to whine and demand for less “free speech”.
Talking point
Saw that the following blog post from over 9 years ago, so one of the first, has had hits. I can still stand by it:
More tweets
[“The government said the Online Safety Act was about protecting children. We were called conspiracy theorists for saying it wasn’t!
Well er … Ofcom is writing to platforms about “crisis situations”, civil unrest and enhanced moderation measures. (Blocking posts they don’t like)
Children aren’t mentioned once. NOT ONCE.
The problem isn’t removing genuine incitement to violence. The real problem is that unelected regulators will pressure platforms to decide what millions of ADULTS can and cannot see whenever a “crisis” is declared.
many platforms will remove perfectly lawful content rather than risk the punishment of Ofcom.
Read the letter for yourself. Link in the thread.]”
The cartoon below was about that sort of situation in the USA, but fits perfectly with the repression of online freedom in the UK:
[“Bloody hell, I’ve been digging more into the government definition of ‘Crisis’ a bit more So… an unelected regulator is now operating within government where the meaning of “crisis” has become very stretched.
The Cabinet Office Amber Book says an emergency under the Civil Contingencies Act covers serious damage to human welfare, the environment or UK security. (fair enough) But then it has added … “For the purposes of this guidance, the terms emergency and crisis are used interchangeably.”… INTERCHANGEABLY?
It also says an emergency/crisis can include situations that have not yet been harmful but have the potential to be (they do not define ‘harmful’ This guidance has not been voted for or debated So let me explain why thats so important. it means that almost any situation the government believes could become a problem can now be treated as a ‘crisis’.
And under that broad language, Ofcom has been able to write to platforms about civil unrest, crisis situations and how they will need to beef up moderation, it isnt just about removing illegal content.
Anything could become a “crisis”, no one voted for the widening of the definition and no one had the opportunity to, because thats how government by guidance works…. hoping you won’t even notice.“]
The “Covid” scamdemic/panicdemic was the template.
[“Oh lookie here…. And now the pincer movement. The government wants …
A NATIONAL COUNTER DISINFORMATION CENTRE!
The foreign affairs committee says it’s about protecting against foreign interference (sensible) But …
the recommendations include cross-government coordination and closer working with private organisations and expanded powers to tackle ‘harmful’ narratives.
Who decides what counts as “disinformation”? Well erm … government regulators and approved experts will decide which narratives are acceptable.
The greatest threat to democracy is not the public discourse. It’s the state deciding what discourse is permitted.
Read my book!“]
The BBC has led the way, with a “BBC Verification” department which is itself actually just a System disinformation-broadcasting department.
Late tweets
Translates to a Commons with about 311 Reform UK MPs (about 15 short of an overall majority), 85 Cons (very weak official Opposition), 83 Greens, 67 LibDems, 45 SNP, 32 Labour [etc].
Those figures would mean that about 370 current Labour MPs would lose their seats, including Starmer and, notionally, any Labour MP at Makerfield.
31 current Conservative Party MPs would also lose their seats.
I think that the polling organizations are going to have to place Restore on the board, because the absence of Restore obviously skews the suggested results in terms of seats notionally won at the next GE.
To my mind, with the present System people in place, almost any money spent on defence is wasted, much of the background policy being predicated on the nation that Russia wants to or even intends to invade Eastern or Central Europe, or even Western Europe, and maybe even the UK. It’s all nonsense.
This country should not be wasting money on supporting “Ukraine” (the corrupt, brutal, and shambolic Jew-Zionist/Ukrainian thug regime in Kiev); neither should any money at all be spent on assisting the vicious Israeli regime.
As for those political parasites and chancers such as Daniel Hannan, suggesting that both State pension benefits such as the Triple Lock, and disability benefits for British people, should be slashed and the monies diverted to “defence”, forget it! Crazy, as well as being political suicide for any party entertaining it.
A million migrant-invaders are coming into the UK every year; others are being born here… Our country is quite rapidly now falling to pieces by reason, mainly, of migration invasion. Stop that, rather than building fantasy armies and navies to be deployed in fantasy scenarios about fighting Russia (and its 7,000 nuclear weapons).
On the contrary, Britain should leave NATO and cultivate good relations with Russia, thus ensuring cheap energy for our industries and domestic consumers, and also giving the UK a huge and valuable market in Russia, a market currently closed to the EU states by reason of their mad anti-Russia sanctions regime. It could all be ours.
…and a member, of course, of Labour Friends of Israel.
Like most former officers who become MPs, Jarvis has proven to be a big disappointment in every way (cf. Johnny Mercer— remember him?).
Ah, another resignation. Al Carns looks good on paper (i.e. his background), but I reserve “judgment” (assessment) until more is known.
Seems to be pro the Kiev regime, so I am not too hopeful, but we shall see.
Wall. Squad. End.
Again more villages or hamlets. Russia needs a gamechanger in Ukraine.
A proper social-national government would change course, radically.
Our animal friends.
Late music
Ian Robert Millard 
John Healey is a total moron even by the usual pathetically low Labour standards. A ‘Defence’ Secretary who had an obsession with the so-called ‘danger’ of Putin’s Russia when that country has failed in a big way to subdue Ukraine after FOUR years of fighting yet Putin is said to want to conquer the whole of Western Europe including us!🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
He also thought it would be a good idea to give away the entire Chagos Islands whilst leasing back an island we already own outright ie Diego Garcia for a pathetic short space of time ie 99 years (some people in America get longer prison terms than that) and paying the mainly Indian Hindu government of Mauritus billions of our taxpayers money for the privalege.
All this when it is abundantly clear the Mauritian government has NO real valid claim to the islands (the Seychelles and particularly The Maldives have better ones), no interest in the islands or the Chagossian people and all their spurious claim of sovereignty is about is to thumb their noses up at the former colonial power (they clearly do not like us as they became a Republic just 24 years after independence) and attempt to get billions of pounds from us to pay for tax cuts and economic development at home.
As the government there and most of the population are comprised of mainly Indian descended people it is clear their claim to the islands was just a massive grifting operation. Indians are amongst the world’s most utterly shameless grifters perhaps the world’s worst. Even Talmud Tommy Ten Names Columbian Marching Powder Rubinstein can’t out do them!
Besides which their sovereignty claim was baseless in another sense in that upon independence in 1968 they promised us they would NOT pursue one over the Chagos Islands.
As ever for a Third World country they broke their promise. To my mind, the only non-white countries in the world who can be trusted to keep their word over treaties, international agreements ect are Japan, South Korea and perhaps Taiwan.
Mainland China can’t eg their breaking of the Sino-British Joint Declaration on Hong Kong.
Any decent, pro-British government would firmly tell Mauritius to kindly eff off and stop their embarrasing grift operation against us.
LikeLike
A proper Defence Secretary would defend our sovereignty over the entire Chagos Islands for ALL time. Also, such a person would tell the cretinous Home Secretary to defend our borders. If we can’t defend Dover then what is the point in having armed forces or that useless, very expensive, so-called nuclear deterrent which failed to fire properly the last time it was tested!🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄😡😡😡🤬🤬
LikeLike
John:
Why does the UK need those little islands? We once had thousands but were a global empire then. The base there is really American. Britain needs to focus on its own part of the world.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The base is BOTH British and American. It is useful for US, British and, in general, Western security against untrustworthy countries like China and India.
Most importantly, it is the homeland of the Chagossian people so handing it over to another state like what was proposed whose people are mainly of Indian descent (Chagossians are of African origin) which they have nothing in common with and whose people mistreated them when the British government under Wilson unjustly deported them to Mauritius without asking for their consent is not an appropriate course of action.
Most Chagossians wish to live under our sovereignty so let them.
LikeLike
John:
Britain needs no base in the Indian Ocean against China or India, firstly because those states are a long long way away from us and, secondly, because the UK has no power at all to influence, and certainly not to damage them, and certainly not via some far-flung air base.
LikeLike
The Chagos Islands ultimately belong to the Chagossian people. Most of them wish to live under our sovereignty so I say let them. They do not want to become Mauritian and fear the idea of Mauritian rule over them since they were discriminated against by ordinary Mauritians and the government of that Indian dsecent populated island which Wilson stupidly gave independence to when it should have been clear to him and the idiots in the Foreign Office that Mauritius would whinge, whinge, whinge and whinge again and again and again and pursue an entirely illegitimate sovereignty claim over the Chagos Islands.
Still, ultimately, we have Old Harrovian idiot, Winston Churchill, to blame for the mess over this issue, Hong Kong, Rhodesia ect as that moron effectively lost us our Empire.
I support the Chagossian people’s wish to live under our sovereignty and I fully understand their rightful fears over potential Mauritian rule.
The Channel Islands came under Nazi German rule from 1940 to 1945 thanks to that perpetually drunk idiot Churchill who should have been immediately sacked by our Monarch for losing British territory. Would it have been ok to force Channel Islanders at the war’s end in 1945 to continue being under German rule regardless of their wishes? I do not think so but this Labour government would be ok with that idea as would the previous Tory government of Liz Truss and Sunak who started this rudiculous sell-out proposal to hand over the Chagos Islands without involving the people it most affects ie Chagossians.
LikeLike
So even the party that should have as one of their prime aims the defence of civil liberties the Lib Dems have now jumped aboard the typically Labour and fake Conservative Party aim of censoring the Internet even more that it has already been due to the moronic Tories and idiots like Nadine Dorries and Priti Damm Useless and their Online Safety Act.
WHAT the hell is the point of the Lib Dems? They even manage to ruin their party’s best policy of all ie the introduction of Proportional Representation by arguing for the impractical for the UK (because of the size of constituencies it would need to use), overly complicated, ranked ballot using (we voted AGAINST the concept of preferential voting in the AV referendum of 2011) semi-proportional Single Transferable Vote (STV) method of PR as they use in only TWO countries for their lower houses of parliament ie the micro state of Malta and the Republic of Ireland.
Instead, the Lib Dems should argue for Mixed-Member PR as Germany and New Zealand use or wholly ‘Open List’ Party List PR as Finland has.
https://www.makevotesmatter.org.uk
LikeLike
Ed Davey is a silly little man. Whilst I rarely, if ever, agreed with him Paddy Ashdown was a pretty good leader for them. I wonder if the German-origin female MP for Bath would make for a better leader? I would be interested to know her thoughts on the LIb Dem obsession with the STV form of Proportional Representation. As a lady originally from Germany, I wonder if she thinks this obsession is barmy and a switch by her party to supporting the German and New Zealand version of PR would be a better Lib Dem policy.
LikeLike
Ed Davey and particularly the Labour and Green Party cretins in the House of Treason are probably very envious of Elon Musk’s admittedly ultra-obscene fortune which looks like soon making him the world’s first Trillionaire.
What is worse for a globalist open borders supporting lunatic? A ‘Nazi’, ‘fascist’, ‘racist’ or a very, very, very RICH ‘Nazi’, ‘fascist’, ‘racist’ like Elon Reeve Musk? 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍👍🤣🤣🤣😅😅👍👍👍👍
LikeLike
I think that Labour Party poll is inaccurate. I very much doubt the Lib Dems, little Kemi Odegoke Unbongo Unbongo’s very exotic fake Conservatives, the Greens and the other candidates will get the kind of vote share between them that poll indicates.
LikeLike
How exactly does Multi Tier Kweer (Ukranian Rent Boys loving) Starmer the evil Israel loving, Britain and the British hating, Grade A, effectively unelected, CUNT (as several very nice T shirts on sale on the internet rightly call the useless tosser) plan to crack down on a company owned by a person who is so ultra-rich he might be the world’s first TRILLIONAIRE soon and which, importantly, is based in a FOREIGN country 3,000 miles away from here?🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
LikeLike
Alison Pearson is a weird little bitch even for someone who ‘earns’ vast amounts for scribbinng gormless crap for what was once a respectable Tory newspaper but has now degenerated under GERMAN ownership into being an embarrasing mouthpiece for the regime in Tel Aviv.
So strongly Zionist and pro-Israeli is the Daily Tel Aviv O Graph that even actual ISRAELI newspapers The Jerusalem Post and Haaretz are more often critical of the government of the Zionist state and Benjamin Netanhayu.
I do not doubt that many Germans are ashamed of the Holocaust but do they REALLY have to go around buying-up British newspapers and then turning them into fanatical Zionist, Pro-Israel ‘newspapers’ to try and make-up for Germany’s national shame?
Please, Germany, keep your national guilt complex at home.
LikeLike
Who is this Linehan that you describe as “a slug”? I gather he is not on your Xmas list.
I looked up Allison Pearson on Wikipedia and found that, to her credit, she opposed the LGBT lobby and opposed lockdowns during the Covid scare. However, they do not mention her subservient attitude to the Jewish lobby. Looking at her photo, I understood why you called her “dimwitted” (LOL)
LikeLike
Claudius:
I do not disagree with some of his views, but anyone tied-in with the Jewish lobby is a red line for me.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Linehan
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I understand. BTW, this fellow Linehan seems to be a loony. He has had fights and lawsuits galore. You are right, most of our enemies are mentally ill.
LikeLike
Does she oppose the wilder excesses of the LGBT Lobby or all of it? Most LGBT rights are perfectly ok. About the only ones there should be any controversy about are gay marriage, gay adoption and 16 being the age of consent. 18 is the more appropriate age.
Alison is a typical Tory/Reform UK airhead. She fails to recognise the fact that ‘anti-semitism’ is NOT automatically the same as ‘anti-Zionism’. Some Jews are anti-Zionist ie the Ultra-orthodox Hasidic Jewish community in Stamford Hill of which Rabbi Elhanan Beck is a prominent member of. He goes to many of the Pro-Palestinian marches in London. Some of the most deluded and fanatical Zionist supporting people are not Jewish at all eg Robert Jenrick and Keir Starmer.
LikeLike
Al Cairns was apparently a member of the Royal Marines! I find it baffling that any Labour MP could have previously been even in normal regiments of the British Army or other normal parts of the armed forces let alone the most elite sections of them such as the Royal Marines.
Are patriotic/nationalist values not wanted at all from recruits nowadays?🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Oh, I forgot, I think the recruiters for our armed forces now look out for signs of ‘Right-wing extremism’ from potential recruits! Patriotic/nationalist values are a big no no!🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
LikeLike
Would it be so bad if Russia under Putin invaded us anyway? Russia locks-up fewer people per year for ‘mean tweets’ and Facebook posts than we do! What an utter national disgrace that statistic is!🤬🤬🤬😡😡😡🤬😢😢😢😢😢
LikeLike
It is a shame Apartheid SA is not still around as then we could ask them to invade us. We might get effective, real police forces then instead of ones mired in the loony-left cult of PC globalism and anti-white racism.
LikeLike
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Die_Stem_Van_Suid_Afrika
LikeLike