Afternoon music
On the blog 2 years ago
Talking point
Same under Trump’s administration.
That commentator was a long-service CIA employee: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Giraldi.
Tweets seen
[“In last night’s Russian missile attack on the energy infrastructure of the Ukrainian capital Kyiv, some 19 missiles were fired, including Onyx hypersonic cruise missiles, Hwasong HS-11 ballistic missiles, S-400 missiles, Iskander-M ballistic missiles, and 2 Zircons, along with dozens of Gran-4/5 jet drones. The targets included the CHP-5 power plant in southern Kyiv, the Kyiv hydroelectric power plant, the Trypillia thermal power plant, and CHP-6 in northeastern Kyiv.”]
After that, no-one (at least no non-Jews), anywhere in the world, wants to hear any more about what is alleged (mainly by the Jewish lobby) to have happened to their ancestors in Eastern and Central Europe from 1933-1945, i.e. 81-93 years ago.
Britain’s ever-more “diverse” (and collapsing) society
[“A teenager who carried out a string of offences including theft and assault has been banned from Carlisle city centre for five years.
Osam Ahmed Mohammed, 18, of Aglionby Street, Carlisle, was handed a criminal behaviour order (CBO) after being sentenced at Carlisle Magistrates’ Court following work by Carlisle neighbourhood policing officers.
Mohammed admitted offences of obstructing a constable, common assault, theft from a shop and breaching bail conditions, according to Cumbria Police.
For the offences, he was given a 12-month community order and a five-year criminal behaviour order.“]
Of course, in a better Britain it would be put up against a wall. Wall. Squad. End. However, even in Britain as it is, one might have expected some form of detention, but no. We are in a death spiral, and hundreds, if not thousands, of bastards of that sort are arriving every day, either via direct invasion of our shores or via superficially “legal” routes. They are also being born here, either to black/brown women, or to stupid white women impregnated by non-whites.
Incidentally, the above-reported matters happened in Carlisle, in Cumbria, a part of the country with one of the smallest proportions of blacks and browns.
They cannot create a society, they cannot maintain a society created by others (Europeans), they cannot even live as parasites in a European society without degrading it simply by their presence in it.
Not often that I agree with Carole Malone…the Sharron Davies tweet is more significant, though.
Burnham has never opposed any form of immigration into this country, by the way. Quite the contrary.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Burnham#Immigration
Incidentally:
Late tweets
Fact is, to be posted to the crumbling front-lines of the Kiev-regime fake state is a near death sentence.
Apart from that, I think that very many Ukrainians want to be in some form reunited with Russia, rather than being ruled over by a brutal and corrupt regime led by a mixed cabal of Jew-Zionists and Ukrainian thugs and criminals.
[“Yesterday, I met the daughter of a prominent member of Moroccan high society. The young woman was transferring her family’s entire financial assets abroad. She told me that a specific group of Jews had been promised large tracts of land both on the country’s Mediterranean coast and on its Atlantic coast, including areas around Esauira. The young woman, about thirty years old, explained to me that her family had been forced, by direct order of the king, to sell their properties to Jewish buyers. If they didn’t, the properties would be confiscated under the pretext of national security reasons. They also forced her uncle to sell his citrus farm to an Israeli company at a price 50% below its true market value. To her and her family, as well as to her uncle and his, they offered the possibility of obtaining a residence permit in Canada, Australia, or the United States, in addition to being able to deposit their funds in any bank in Israel and later transfer them to any of those countries. This is exactly the same strategy that the Zionists used with the most influential Palestinian families during the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s.“]
I had not previously heard of that Moroccan situation.
“Them” (again)…
New York City. Zoo.
The victim was a hero for putting them in their place eventually.
Come to think of it, Bernhard Goetz was also a hero in his day: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_New_York_City_Subway_shooting.
We all know, in our hearts, that Britain is not going to come out of this swamp by “debating”, by voting in a rigged system for rigged and (((controlled))) parties, by tweeting, by blogging, by vlogging, or by appealing to the better nature of those that have no better nature.
‘Nuff said.
[“Smashing pensioners while opening the door wider is not a side note in Burnham’s pitch, it is the pitch, and up here you can already see what that means in the hotels, the lists and the people who paid in for decades getting told there is nothing left. The media class can call it hope. The rest of us can see it for what it is. BETRAYAL.“]
We hear a lot from Jew-Zionists, from “antifa” loonies, from the decadent and horrible mainstream media scribblers and talking heads —and from the brainwashed police woodentops etc as well— about “hate”. I tell you where I see “hate” (apart from the general way in which quite a few Jews, Muslims, and blacks view the white Europeans who have created almost everything worthwhile over the past 2,500 years): the recent propaganda against the British late middle-aged and elderly.
Look at the gloating over Burnham’s dumping of the Triple Lock. You see it on Twitter/X, you see it in some newspapers. There is more than firmly-held beliefs around generational fairness, the “national debt” etc to this.
There is a certain pathology here.
There is a pretty strong streak of sadism in this “debate”, an element of “smash the weak old pensioners (who cannot fight back)“, just as there was in 2010-2015 when the part-Jews David Cameron-Levita and George Osborne blamed the sick, disabled, and unemployed for the fact that Britain and its economy were tanking.
As a matter of fact, I think that the third of the electorate who are above State Pension age can and will fight back, and will mostly do so by abandoning the Labour Party and also the Conservative Party. To some degree, that has already happened.
The voters 65+ may not trust or even like Farage and Reform, but will hit out at Burnham and Labour (especially) by voting Reform or Restore (albeit that those two will both be weakened by having to stand candidates against each other).
I recall reading, very many years ago, about Rudolf Steiner’s prediction that, in the far future, in the 7th Post-Atlantean Age (we are at present in the 5th), society would collapse via a so-called “War of All Against All”, in which every race, sex, age-group, income/capital group etc would engage in all-out social warfare. That is not what we see today, but there are strong indications already of such divisions being entrenched.
Late music
Useless. Get rid of him.
https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20260925-argentina-poverty-rate-nearly-one-in-three-milei
LikeLike
Those f… bastards running Greggs deserve to be …. Typical of the greedy, obnoxious business owners obsessed with profit! Getting rid of people to replace them with robots! People should boycott them.
LikeLike
Claudius:
As Marx seems to have predicted, eventually there will only be a minority of the population, perhaps a small minority, working for pay, working “transactionally”. Robots and AI will be doing much of the work.
Basic Income must be the way forward. Failing that, the masses, without employment, will not have the money to buy, and so those selling products and services will, in turn, have few customers. Their businesses will then collapse, as will the economy generally.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I understand what you say, but who can guarantee that the Basic Income would be sufficient for, let´s say, a family of four? Also, as there will be fewer people working as a consequence of the widespread use of AI, there will be an enormous number of people depending on this subsidy.
Anyway, I hope I will be out of this world fairly soon. Option No. 2 to escape the horrible near future would be to win the lottery. (LOL)
LikeLike
Claudius:
One of the merits of a straight basic income policy would be its uncomplicated nature. Every citizen gets the same. If you want some people, eg elderly, disabled, sick,or those with children, to get more than the basic amount, you might have to do that via a separate programme or programmes.
Once you get into the realms of “this family is a mother alone with six children etc but she only gets the same as the man in the next house who lives alone and also has a paid job” then the great merit of simplicity is lost and you have to employ many more staff (or maybe AI…) to work out the amounts, and stop any fraud etc.
Yes, there might indeed be huge numbers of claimants, but with AI and robotics advancing, that huge horde without income or with a need for Basic Income is near-inevitable. Without that provided income, there will be a dystopian society never before seen, and political upheaval as well.
In any case, as said, and indeed as Marx commented (re. the advance of technology even in his day), without enough people with money enough to spend, the whole economy will collapse.
LikeLike
Yes, I agree with what you said. There will inevitably be many special cases like the one you mentioned.
Have you read Griffin´s article about Andy Burnham? I haven´t, but the idea that he can stay in power for more than 4 years seems ridiculous to me.
LikeLike
Claudius:
I read it, or skimmed it.
At present, it looks like Labour might get a plurality of Westminster seats without getting a majority of seats. Thus, we are in coalition territory after the next general election.The LibDems and others would support Labour, at a price.
Were that next election to be held next year, such a coalition, or arrangement, might give Burnham up to 5 years, plus 2026-2027, so anything up to 6 years altogether, though he would be weak, dependent on those (probably LibDem) allies.
As the polls now stand, Labour might be 50+ seats short of a majority. Only the LibDems would (probably) have enough seats (50-70) to plug the gap.
LikeLike
I can see I was wrong in dismissing Burnham so quickly. So, the muppet may stay in power for another 4 or 6 years. Well, somehow it does not surprise me. Having said that, considering Reform is such a bad joke, why are “they” so concerned about keeping Farage out?
I can understand a similar tactic being applied in France because, although Marie Le Pen is another fake and a Zionist puppet, her base is not, and her party does not have (as far as I know) black & brown candidates. In the last French election, the left and centre were horrified by the support Le Pen was getting and formed a coalition that managed to keep her out of the Elysée.
LikeLike
Claudius:
The System, at a high level, is not really anti-Farage. He has been on TV constantly for decades, certainly for at least 18+ years. The System used UKIP (one of his previous vehicles) to help crush a more genuine party, the BNP.
The anti-Farage, anti-Reform contingent are those lower down the food chain, the monkeys rather than the organ-grinders if you like.
The specifically Jewish element is not anti-Reform, especially now that there is a “Reform Friends of Israel” group. Farage is pro-Jew, pro-Israel; Tice is even worse. The Jews who oppose them are, again, not the “chief priests and elders” but the less influential ones.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, you are right, of course. As a public figure, the treatment of Farage by the media resembles the treatment given to Trump since 2016. Both are pathetic servants of the Jewish power; however, the System insists on presenting them as “dangerous fascists” Sure, and I am Mahatma Gandhi!
LikeLike