Tag Archives: electoral fraud

Diary Blog, 27 February 2026, including views about the result of the Gorton and Denton by-election

Morning music

Dry cold air, a frozen pond, skates, winter sun, and a pretty girl. Life could be worse…

Gorton and Denton by-election result

Well, there it is. It seems that a considerable proportion of the Green votes may have been tainted by coercive “family voting” by Pakistanis (12% at polling stations, and an unknown number via postal voting), but even that might not have changed the result.

Social media is already alive with idiotic white “me-too” type anti-Reform tweeters etc, all saying what a humiliation this has been for Reform and for Matt Goodwin personally. Really? Reform doubled its percentage share of the vote since 2024, less than 2 years ago. True, the Greens tripled their 2024 vote, but Labour halved their share.

The real story here is that the traditional “mainstream” parties have all been rejected by the voters, both white and non-white.

Labour lost a seat, and in an area, which has been a Labour stronghold throughout living memory. Labour’s vote-share fell from 50.8% in 2024 to exactly half of that, 25.4%, at the by-election.

The Conservative Party scored 7.9% in 2024, but now only 1.9%.

The LibDems scored 3.8% in 2024, but only 1.8% this time.

Contrary to what the pseudo-“Green” supporters on social media are saying, the big loser at Gorton and Denton was not Reform but the Labour Party.

Gorton and Denton was only 440th on the Reform UK target list, and/but was considered a very safe Labour seat.

Fairly disastrous for Labour. If Labour cannot win, or even come second, in a place like that, where can it win?

As for Reform, well…had it been social-national, rather than “libertarian” fake “conservative”-nationalist (if “nationalist” at all), if it were not so pro-finance capitalist, not so very pro-Jew, pro-Israel, not so hostile (Tice and Farage) to employed persons and to people cheated out of property-ownership (and so having to rent from the likes of Tice), it might have won handsomely in this by-election.

The new Green Party MP, Hannah Spencer, looks to me like both a fake and a freak.

I think that head-counting “democracy” of this sort really is washed-up in the UK. It just does not work in a so-called “multicultural society”.

As for Starmer-stein, and as blogged previously, I doubt he will resign. He likes the status and money and the rest too much. He loves to parade, albeit comically, on the world stage, and play the “world statesman”, however implausibly. He will cling on until people stamp on his fingers.

The other big loser out of the by-election might be the pathetic Corbyn/Sultana “Your Party”, which did not contest the seat, but has now been totally overshadowed and made irrelevant by the Green triumph.

More about the Jew Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Andrew Windsor etc

Well, I have just watched a Netflix documentary (4 or 5 hour-long episodes) about the case of the Jew Epstein etc. It ends with the indictment of the half-Jewish Ghislaine Maxwell, after the supposed suicide of Epstein, so misses out her conviction and sentence, and the fall of “The Andrew Formerly Known As Prince”.

Fairly good as a documentary, and it kept the interest, but it completely failed to investigate the Israeli intelligence and espionage connections. Not one word…

No mention of MOSSAD, Aman, the Trilateral Commission, or the Council on Foreign Relations.

In fact, despite almost all the main characters on the “guilty” and/or allegedly guilty side (Epstein, Maxwell, Dershowitz, many many others) having been Jews or (in Ghislaine Maxwell’s case) half-Jews, the word “Jew” was, I think, not uttered even once. Of course, not all of the alleged abusers were Jews (Andrew Windsor, Bill Clinton etc) but many were, and most if not all of those connected in other ways to Epstein were Jews, even those who were not American (e.g. “lord” Mandelson).

Still, it was good to reflect, while watching the high life of Epstein, on the fact that the Jew has gone up the chimney, and that Ghislaine Maxwell remains in a U.S. prison, albeit now in a “Club Fed” soft one, and may remain there for much of the rest of her life.

See also:

Tweets seen

In the unlikely event of those figures being the outcome of a general election, the House of Commons would consist of about 467 Reform UK MPs (massive massive majority), Greens 82 (official Opposition but very weak), 40 SNP, 27 LibDems, and 12 Lab. Oh, and zero Cons…

It is quite funny to see the usual Labour/Green idiots getting it wrong again. Yes, Reform failed to win the Gorton and Denton by-election, but Greens standing elsewhere will mostly benefit Reform by knocking out Labour without themselves being able to win.

As I said today and previously, Starmer will only give up his position and privileges when people start to stamp on his fingers to make him let go…

Starmer-stein is becoming totally pathetic.

Starmer-stein may have to go but not, I think, swiftly. Not if he himself has any say in it.

That is dire, even by the standards of Starmer-stein, a no-ideas, box-ticking, bureaucrat-lawyer. Glib but utterly meaningless phrases: “Our communities“, “laser focused” etc. He did make a couple of good points (about minimum wage and the rights of renters) but this government is 95%+ a farrago of soundbites that mean absolutely nothing. Just a pack of jokers, as were the “Conservative” governments of 2010-2024.

Starmer even ticked the “support Ukraine” box, which is an incredible waste of money, and a potential trigger for a war which would leave the UK a charred and radioactive wasteland.

What is “not fair” about hating Starmer-stein? He poses on the world stage while the country slides into dystopia, he makes lying noises about “smashing the gangs” while migrant-invaders flood into the UK, he has virtually prevented poor British people from getting homes (whether private or social) while placing migrant-invaders (many criminal) into council and housing association houses and flats, and throws money away on support for Israel and “Ukraine” (Kiev regime), while the standard of living of 90% of the UK population is plummeting. Oh, and after the 2024 migrant-hotels and sex crime protests, he interfered with the judicial protests and demanded that protesters be imprisoned, and even held in custody until trial months or years later; some died.

Starmer is evil, and if he merely loses his unmerited status as Prime Minister, a position which he has proven he cannot fulfil properly, he will be lucky indeed.

Ha. Hodges was tweeting only yesterday that he could not see Labour losing the by-election! That aged well! (about 12 hours).

So, according to Hodges, Reform did not come close to winning? Well, they came second, and though their vote was below 29%, that is after all nearly a third of the votes cast, and in a constituency where about a third of the voters are not even (really) English/British (yes, they probably do have British, as well as Pakistani, passports).

It may be that the Reform UK “ceiling” is around 35%, or even the Gorton and Denton figure of 28.7%, but even the latter would ensure that Reform would win a plurality of Commons seats, and perhaps a majority, unless Labour can exceed that figure, and there is no sign of that, at present.

As for the Greens, they can only win seats where there are either huge numbers of freaks, brainless young know-nothings and “wokes” (such as Brighton Pavilion), or seats where there are huge numbers of Muslim voters with no other likely options (as at Gorton and Denton). The Greens may be able to get 20, 50, even 75 seats at a general election, if Labour continues to be hated and despised, but probably no more.

At present, Reform, underwhelming as it is, is stll likely to win a plurality of seats at the next general election.

I think Westminster Bubblers such as Hodges find it hard to understand that both Lab and Con have had their day, and for the same reason— their natural support-bases are eroding, and fast.

For once, I agree with Farage completely.

If you turn large parts of your country into an Indo-Pak ghetto, that is what you get…

On the wider question of Reform v. Green, just look at all the opinion polling from the past year. Reform 25%-35%, Greens 10%-18%. The many anti-Reform (anti-national) tweeters etc cannot seem to grasp that, in 90% of the constituencies, all they will do at the next general election is weaken the Labour vote and so allow Reform to win.

Within about 15 years, the various ethnic factions within the UK will not be voting, they will be arming.

Well, wouldn’t you know…

Every. Single. Time.

Wall. Squad. End.

[“A pharmacy manager in Bradford has been jailed for sexually abusing a child who had also been r-ped by another man.

Shahzad Hussain, 27, contacted the girl on Snapchat, lied about his age and groomed her in 2022. He was found guilty following a trial of six offences relating to sexual activity with a child. Last month, Ahmer Hamid, 29, was jailed for nine years after being found guilty of driving the same girl to a secluded location and r-ping her in a separate incident in 2022. Defence said Hussain, “was a man of previous good character” and “he’s paid the ultimate price” [of losing his job] due to a “weekend of terrible behaviour”. Hussain was jailed for just seven years. He was ordered an SHPO curbing internet use for 15 years and on sex offenders register for life. Sickening.“]

Wall. Squad. End.

He will be out in about 4.5 years but, when Britain has a real British government, will be tracked down and eliminated with the rest.

Wall. Squad. End; and refer to previous comment.

The vituperative and fanatical Jew-Zionist barrister, Simon Myerson, of Leeds [@scynic1], who was sacked a couple of years ago as a part-time judge (Recorder) for being unable or unwilling to stop intimidating and insulting people on social media, actually set up a “charity” to import more Afghans (to the UK, not Israel, needless to add).

Every. Single. Time.

Incidentally, tweeter Sophie Meaden, as a law student, will be aware that one requirement of the existence of a charity under English law is that it should have “public benefit”. What possible public benefit can there be in importing the racially/culturally inferior into this country?

Psychologically, a win for Goodwin would have been better for Reform, but the swing at Gorton and Denton might indicate that Reform can easily get an overall majority at the next general election, pushing both Labour and Conservative, let alone the fake “Green” freaks into double-digit or even single-digit territory.

The result at Gorton and Denton also tends to destroy any remaining faith of white English/British people in the supposedly “democratic” electoral system (large ethnic minority bloc-voting, coercive “family voting” by Paki-stani Muslims, electoral fraud of various kinds), and that disenchantment may eventually fuel a proper national uprising.

British voters have been pushed to and beyond the limit by the dual incompetence and malice of the Labour and Conservative parties, the main System parties.

Of course, the Greens only triumphed at the by-election by a shameless pandering to the ethnic minorities, especially Pakistani Muslims. That minority voted, one can fairly accurately guess, in numbers around 12,000 of the 37,000 voters who voted. Seems that rather more than half of the Muslim element, maybe even three-quarters, voted Green (the rest voted Labour).

The Greens got just under 15,000 votes altogether, so between ~6,000 and ~9,000+ of the Greens’ votes were Muslim votes. Without those votes, the Greens would have come a poor third with as few as ~6,000 votes.

I note that none of the msm scribblers and talking heads are willing to engage with the realities; all talk or scribble is about parties as though policies and personalities are the only things that matter. Race and culture of the voters is only mentioned, if at all, in passing, yet the Green triumph was mainly an ethnic non-English/British win over the real British in that area, and because the stupid whites —disenchanted with fake Labour, so be it— who voted Green allied themselves with the Muslim Pakistanis. I can only assume that those white Green voters wanted something socialist or at least social, and neither Labour nor Reform suited them.

Late tweets seen

Hard to assess, but seems plausible, looking at the fact that the Labour vote “only” halved, rather than collapsing completely. After all, few white (i.e. English/British) people are now going to vote Labour, wherever they may live.

Turnout at the by-election was slightly below 50% (47.62%), and there are about 80,000 voters of which just under 37,000 voted. Muslims etc (non-whites) who voted probably numbered somewhere between 12,000 and 20,000. It can be seen that, without the non-white (almost all Pakistani Muslim) voters, both the Greens and Labour would have scored around 5,000 votes, maybe fewer than 5,000, and Matt Goodwin/Reform would have won easily.

In parts of England and Wales where the ethnic minorities are “only” 5%, 10%, or even 20%, Reform is still very much on track for an historic overall victory. The upcoming May local elections will be interesting to see.

Having said that, probably around 25,000-30,000+ white voters voted at that by-election. Fewer than 11,000 voted Reform. At least 14,000, maybe more, voted Labour or Green. I suspect that the old and very old voted in the mindless tribal-Labour way one sees in the North of England; the young or very young, e.g. students and dropouts, where they voted at all, may have voted Green.

Reform’s weakness, as often blogged, is that it is not social-national. Its ceiling may not be (as Dan Hodges thinks) 28%, but it may be around 35%. All the same, either figure might yet put Reform into government.

Does Hodges understand just how atypical Gorton and Denton is? The Greens might manage 50 seats at a general election; I doubt more. There are huge areas of “Middle England” where both Labour and Conservatives are almost swear-words now. Those areas are going to go Reform almost en bloc as things stand.

Hodges just wilfully fails to understand that, when you import millions of Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, blacks etc, you become, in proportion, a country with traits like Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, African countries etc.

Fixed. Rigged. Fake “democracy”…

I see on TV news that there are hopes for an agreement between Iran and the USA re. nuclear enrichment etc. It occurs to me that those subtle Iranians might have a strategy— agree to pause uranium enrichment and nuclear weapons research, but at the same time to step up, hugely, their conventional missile production (I read that they presently produce about 100 missiles per month, many hypersonic).

If they can produce 200 a month for 3-4 years, they will have in readiness up to 10,000 missiles, maybe 15,000 if you include their present stock, missiles many of which will be impossible to intercept; by about 2029 or 2030. The missiles will be buried below mountains, ever-deeper, and almost impossible to destroy pre-launch. On that basis, Israel is doomed.

On the other hand, maybe the USA is about to attack, doing Israel’s bidding yet again…

The situation is similar with the UK msm.

[“The Mossad made sure all jews were warned before their terror attack on the American people at 911.
But they were not only warned not to enter the Twin Towers.
One of my bosses (jewish) at Credit Suisse First Boston showed me his boarding pass to one of the hijacked planes.
He told me had was warned not to go on the plane.
He told me he kept the boarding pass in his wallet ever since.
At the time I thought it was a Cohencidence.
Not any more.
We need to end Pax Judaica
and the terror state of Israel
“]

Late music

Diary Blog, 26 February 2026

Morning music

[purifying lemniscate waterfall]

Talking point

Happened to see a news report from 2018, quoting Jewish organizations, which report stated that “the most antisemitic cities in Europe…” [were/are]…”London and Paris“.

The cities with the most Jews in Europe are…London and Paris!

How strange, or perhaps not.

Talking point

Talking point

More music

[The Angel of the North]

Tweets seen

The Gorton and Denton by-election.

I have blogged my views in previous blog posts over the past month or so. Now the voters are voting, and the result will be known tonight or tomorrow. All three main contenders —Reform, Green, Labour— are neck-and-neck.

[“A few details the jew below ‘accidentally’ left out for obvious reasons:

  • The Struma was actually originally a steam-powered luxury yacht but was old and was being used as a cattle transport on the Danube before being outfitted with a cheap old second-hand diesel engine for the voyage.
  • The jews on board all paid the Betar movement (the Revisionist Zionist Youth Movement) large amounts of money for their tickets to go to Palestine and Betar handled everything else. Originally the Haganah were going to use the Struma for the same thing but from Bulgaria to Palestine.
  • The jews on board were from Romania not the Third Reich plus 60 members of the Betar movement and their leaving Romania had the support and encouragement of the Romanian government.
  • Betar lied to the jewish passengers and claimed they were just going to make a short stop in Turkey to ‘collect their visas for Palestine’.
  • Betar only put two lifeboats on the Struma for 791 crew and passengers.
  • Betar packed the bottom of the ship with bunkbeds so as to cram as many jewish passengers in as possible.
  • The diesel engine immediately failed when the Struma was getting out of the harbour in Romania.
  • The Romanian navy towed the Struma at Betar’s request out to sea and through the Axis minefields to make sure they were okay. Then the Romanians left while Betar tried to repair their diesel motor.
  • Betar failed to repair the Struma’s diesel engine and signalled distress. The Romanian navy returned and Betar demanded the Romanians fix their engine for free; the Romanians refused and requested to be paid for their time and the parts. Betar refused to pay the Romanians so the passengers paid the Romanians with their wedding rings instead; the Romanians then fixed the Stuma’s engine.
  • Two days later the Struma’s engine promptly failed again and she was towed into Istanbul harbour by the Turkish navy on 15th December 1941.
  • It was then revealed that Betar hadn’t arranged any visas to Palestine at all for the passengers or the Betar youth. The British refused them permission to migrate to Palestine as illegal immigrants (per the British White Paper of 1939 on this) and Turkey refused to grand them entry as illegal immigrants (so as to not encourage more such immigration and burden their tax payers and ports).
  • Weeks of negotiation followed between the British and Turks; the jews then ran out of food and refused to let Turkish police board the Struma. The result was the British honoured expired visas for Palestine held by a couple of the passengers plus granted visas to any jew who was 11-16 years old. While the Turks hospitalized one jew who was ill but the bulk of the jews didn’t fit this criteria. However neither the British or the Turks agreed to take these jewish illegal immigrants.
  • The Turkish government spent weeks trying to repair the Struma’s engine but failed. Eventually the Turkish authorities had had enough of jews demanding things from them (food, immigration visas, free repairs etc) so they towed the Struma out to international waters for jewish organizations or another country to sort out.
  • The Struma floats around a bit with no engine; jewish groups make no attempt to rescue the crew and passengers.
  • Soviet submarine Shch-213 on secret orders to engage in unrestricted submarine warfare sinks the Struma which is still overcrowded and only has two lifeboats.
  • The Turkish navy tries to effect a rescue but are too late.

In other words: the Struma disaster was almost entirely the fault of the Betar Zionist Youth organization and nothing to do with the Axis whatsoever with the only minimal blame going to the British, the Soviets and the Turks.“]

We shall know soon enough.

[“The by-election in Gorton and Denton shows that democracy can’t survive in a multicultural country. It just becomes a demographic head count.

People no longer vote according to values or policy, they vote according to tribal loyalties and concerns.

As the non-native population grows it will vote for redistribution of wealth from the native population, assisted by leftists who ally with them against their common enemies of “capitalism”, “the nation state” and “attractive, successful people”. This is already happening – look at the Green Party.

Why did you think the left brought these people in?

Unless British people realise what’s happening and deal with it (unlikely because it would mean rejecting the national religion of multiculturalism, saying no to women and being a bit mean to people who hate us), the best we can hope for is South Africanisation; a dwindling productive population squeezed by an increasingly bitter and entitled majority.

Worst case scenario: Lebanon.

In essence, points made on the blog many times.

See also:

Frightening to think how many idiots such as that woman live in this country, even in areas such as Gorton and Denton, which are (I read) such as you would think might cause them to know better.

Seems that she wants more immigrants to arrive. “Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad.”

As the woman said, though, she is voting against Labour and Reform, more than just voting for the Greens. A protest vote, mostly.

I agree with him. That freak may (we shall see) soon be a Member of Parliament. An enemy of the future of the British people. Still, I want Starmer-stein Labour to lose more than I want the freak and her pseudo-“green” fellow-freaks to lose, albeit that the best result at the by-election would be a win for Goodwin and Reform.

As previously blogged, I have found that the betting market is a poor predictor of by-election results, and anyway, at time of writing there is still a 5-hour window in which eligible voters can vote. The Greens may win, but Reform and Goodwin also have a sporting chance, despite the fact that a third of the voters in that semi-ghetto are non-white.

[“They’re being moved to HMOs all across the country, you absolute mong.

Which means it’s even harder for us to locate where these savages are. But it’s all okay for you, living in your manor where you’re safe and sound where it’s working class women – such as myself – and children who will be even more in danger now!

Hang your head in shame, you old witch. You’re advocating for the rape of fellow women and girls.“]

Deborah Meaden is a fake, in my opinion. Pretends to be so “caring/sharing/communitarian”, while grubbing and grabbing as much money as possible in the finance-capitalist marketplace, and posing as some kind of “green”-aware capitalist despite sometimes using private helicopters.

In 2009, a planning inspector criticised Meaden’s evidence to his enquiry as “implausible” in a dispute over the granting of village green status to a field on which Mudstone LLP, a firm in which she is a partner, wished to build 48 homes

[Wikipedia]

In politics, she endorsed the Liberal Democrats in 2019 and endorsed Labour in 2024.[33][34] In October 2025, she said “the rising popularity of the Green Party was ‘extremely hopeful'”

[Wikipedia]

Unenforceable“? In places such as Afghanistan, it is illegal for women not to be covered; any woman defying that edict is taken away, beaten, even shot. In other words, the edict is, in a word, enforced… Just reverse the requirement, and a ban would be enforceable here too (though I myself see such a ban as pointless anyway).

If the idea is to stop people wearing face coverings at marches, demonstrations etc, then again the ban would be enforceable, in principle, but this is not a major issue.

“Griffin”, not “Griffen“, but yes…

He was acquitted, incidentally, by the same kind of British jury that Lammy wants to abolish.

Wall. Squad. End.

In a better society, the mother would be charged with having committed Rassenschande. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rassenschande.

The above crime occurred in the USA, but the UK also has a massive problem.

Talking point

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15594707/Number-asylum-seekers-granted-permission-stay-Britain-soars-third.html

As I predicted.

Get rid of them

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15595869/Afghan-asylum-seeker-sexually-assaulted-women-takeaways-jailed.html

An asylum seeker who sexually assaulted two women at their homes while delivering their takeaways has been jailed.

Shafiullah Rasooli, an Afghan national, was charged with three counts of sexual assault and was convicted following a trial at Sevenoaks Magistrates’ Court.

On Wednesday, he was handed the two-and-a-half-year prison sentence as well as a a Sexual Harm Prevention Order.”

No deportation order, so the untermensch will be out in about a year, maybe less, and will then still be here, supported by the UK taxpayer.

A proper government would have him put up against a wall and shot.

More tweets

[“20 Hitler Speeches Translated: Adolf Hitler – 11-08-42.mp4 Adolf Hitler commemorates the Putsch – 110842.mp4 Adolf Hitler – Proclamation To The German Volk.mp4 Berlin – Feb 1-1933 – Proclamation Of The Reich To The German Volk.mp4 Berlin – January 30 – 1939 – Address to the Reichstag.mp4 December 11, 1941 – Germany Declares War On The USA.mp4 Dusseldorf – January 27th – 1932.mp4 Hitler – Industry Club Speech – 1932.mp4 Hitler – Munich – 041323.mp4 Hitler – Nuremberg – 21Aug27.mp4 Hitler – Proclamation – 1932.mp4 Hitler’s Trial Speeches – 26Feb1924 and 27Mar1924.mp4 January 30, 1945 – Hitler’s Final Live Radio Broadcast.mp4 June 22, 1941 – Germany Declares War On Russia.mp4 Munich – April 27th – 1923.mp4 Munich – July 28 – 1922 – English – 360p.mp4 Munich – May 12 – 1922 – English – 360p.mp4 On National Socialism And World Relations – 01301937.mp4 The Führer To The German People – 22 June 1941.mp4

Audiobook Project: https://mega.nz/folder/ORNUhAbZ

code: -d-4zuFfpgCl1vbxu2lc-A“]

Anyone pro-Israel, pro the Jewish lobby in the UK, is an enemy of the UK.

Volksgemeinschaft?

Whichever party wins the by-election, it is clear that the old “three main (LibLabCon) parties” rigged scam is finished. It is also clear that the voters are now mainly voting on ethnic lines. What will matter in the future is not who has the most votes, but who has the most, and best, soldiers.

Britische Freikorps?

Also, the LibDems used to be notorious as the shameless party that jumped on every bandwagon to get votes, espousing different policies in different constituencies. That “accolade” has now been transferred to the Green Party…

Late music

Diary Blog, 2 June 2024, including Robert Largan’s deliberate dishonesty in the election for the High Peak constituency

Morning music

Robert Largan, the 2024 General Election, and the constituency of High Peak

Largan. A Conservative Friends of Israel puppet. A nasty little man, who used to be an accountant for Marks & Spencer. Also, a dishonest little bastard.

Largan has obviously realized that, as a “Conservative” MP who won his seat narrowly in 2019, with a majority of only 509 votes, he has little chance of beating the Labour candidate this time in the normal way, so has decided to cheat.

Largan is an election cheat. Those fake “Labour” and “Reform UK” posters he has published are an outright attempt to defraud the High Peak electorate.

Despite having been a barrister (in practice or overseas employed practice 1992-2008, and still nominally a barrister until wrongfully and unlawfully disbarred for political reasons in late 2016), I know little about the law pertaining to elections.

I have just looked at the links below: https://www.college.police.uk/app/policing-elections/investigating-electoral-malpractice; and https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/guidance-candidates-and-agents-uk-parliamentary-general-elections-great-britain/campaigning/table-offences; and

What’s not in the law

There is nothing in law that requires a party to include their logo on campaign material.

There is also no requirement in law to specify what colours or branding a party needs to use in their material.

[https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/voting-and-elections/campaigning-election/campaign-material-and-campaigning-polling-day]

The above, however, does not seem to cover the case of a candidate deceptively using the style and colours of his opponents in order to trick voters directly.

See also https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/election-offences

Even if Largan is not actually in breach of electoral law (and I cannot say whether that is so or not), in view of his deliberate and dishonest copying of the colour and style of Labour and Reform UK posters, the voters of High Peak must be made aware of how very dishonest and desperate Largan is (desperate not to have to get a real job again, something he has only had for 5 out of his 38 years).

Send Largan back to counting beans for M&S.

Actually, when you think how likely (in fact, inevitable) it was that Largan’s deception would be discovered (having after all been publicized on Twitter/X by Largan himself!), it does call into question Largan’s commonsense or lack of the same. His judgment too. He is an idiot.

Desperate, yes, so stupid and desperate, maybe not.

Robert Largan—serially dishonest and not even very clever in being so.

Imagine, though, how little confidence Largan must have in the “Conservative” brand to try to camouflage himself on different election posters as Labour, and Reform UK and Green, in other words anything but “Conservative”…and also even printing a fake “newspaper”.

Faux-proletarian scribbler Dan Hodges is one of the least credible of his type. “Poor” scarcely covers his nonsense.

Well, I agree with Hodges on that, at least in terms of the gap between Con and Lab, but then, after all, I did predict on the blog quite some months ago that, contrary to the usual scenario, there would not be a convergence in the polling prior to Election Day. The reason is clear— people have just given up on the “Conservatives”. Labour is disliked but, in the UK’s basically binary system, if people do not vote Con, Lab profit thereby.

Look at how many Con MPs are failing to contest GE 2024, and look at the poor quality of most of those intending to contest it. Robert Largan is but one, and egregious, example of that.

The voters have a choice: Labour, who will probably be both incompetent and repressive, and the “Conservatives”, who have already proven themselves incompetent and repressive. Both parties are as good as controlled by the…”Israel lobby”.

Really? I can think of a number of things of which one could accuse Sunak, but surely not that. Or have I misunderstood the headline?…

Penny Mordaunt got a very high 61.4% vote-share in 2019, and her vote -share has increased every election since she was first elected in 2010, but Portsmouth North has been a “bellwether” seat since 1966, so the chances are that she will lose this time, though she may just be able to buck the trend: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portsmouth_North_(UK_Parliament_constituency)#Elections_in_the_2020s.

Seems a good idea.

In the past, there was clear blue water between Con and Lab, at least on some issues, but the Cons cannot now even compete on issues traditionally (if falsely) their own: immigration, defence, law and order, Treasury competence. Etc. They have failed miserably on all of those and more.

That is the core point, surely. I can think of no issue on which the Cons can credibly make a stand, not even on cultural issues such as the trans nonsense, free speech etc. They are, on those topics, so far as bad as Labour, overall.

I suppose that it might be embarrassing to invite the murderous Israeli regime there; akin to inviting one of the African cannibal dictators of the recent past, such as Bokassa, to a food and drink exhibition.

I suppose that Netanyahu is well-guarded, but so far the only Israeli (ex-) PM to be assassinated (Rabin) was hit by Jewish dissidents, not Arab Palestinians.

The label “far right” (like “right and “left“) is meaningless. Policy is key.

The “Tommy Robinson” crowd are sheep, though they cannot see that. What policies does “Tommy” offer? None, except to —somehow— stop the growth of Islamic or Islamist influence in the UK. Gesture politics, and controlled opposition. Meaningless.

you read it here first“…

Afternoon music

[old waltz “Sorrow“]
[painting by Konstantin Korovin]
[painting by Volegov]

More tweets seen

There were genuine reasons to favour Con over Lab in, say, 1970, 1974, even 1979 and 1983, though I personally have voted only once, aged —just— 18, in October 1974, and it was not for a System party (my chosen candidate came 4th out of 4 with about 600 votes).

Both major System parties have changed out of all recognition since the 1970s, and are really just corporate facades, indeed to a large extent similar corporate facades, hiding the almost identical core ideologies within.

Oh, I believe that evil woman all right. She will stop the cross-Channel boats, or most of them. She will do it by setting up places in France where 90%+ of those applying for asylum will simply have their applications rubberstamped. They will then get ferries to the UK.

At present ~1M unwanted immigrants are coming to the UK every year, whether “legally” or not. That is the problem, not the rubber boat mob as such.

The other aspect of the problem we face is that there are large numbers of complete idiots who naively (or actively maliciously) prefer to believe that the UK can absorb millions of mostly uneducated, mostly parasitic, often hostile non-white immigrants without any effect on our way of life, culture, or public services. Some of the idiots even prefer to believe that the influx is something positive…

Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalergi_Plan.

That Osland person, apparently a freelance scribbler, has posted quite a number of other socially and economically-illiterate tweets, such as, today:

Incredibly (or maybe not, in view of Britain’s ever-sliding educational standards), no less than 109,000 Twitter twits “follow” Osland’s Twitter/X account.

There may be a billion or more non-whites in the world who, in principle, might make out a case for UK residence, either on the basis of asylum (under outdated rules) or otherwise. How many houses do Osland and his fellow-idiots think might be required? 500 million? 200 million? (paid for, incidentally, by the British people). That’s before they start to breed, of course. The whole argument these people put forward is a nonsensical one.

Look at it, making one of “their” characteristic gestures…

As to China being “Putin’s tool“, how ridiculous can Zelly get?

Late music

Peterborough By-Election: post-poll analysis and thoughts

Well, I got it wrong vis a vis the headline result. I thought that the Brexit Party would win and indeed enjoy a near-walkover. In the event, Brexit Party had to accept a close 2nd place. As the Americans are supposed to say, “close but no cigar”.

The result of the Peterborough by-election

The result was:

  • Labour 10,484 votes, a vote share of 31% (down from 48% in 2017);
  • Brexit Party 9,801 (29%);
  • Conservative Party 7,243 (21%, down from 46% in 2017);
  • LibDems 4,159;
  • Green 1,035;
  • UKIP 400.

All others, nine in number, received fewer than 200 votes each, most below 100.

In retrospect, my own prediction was badly misled by the betting (which even on the day showed Brexit Party as very heavily odds-on) and by the large and impressive meetings Farage held in the city (one with 2,000 in the auditorium).

I was right about the Conservatives coming third and the LibDems in fourth etc. Still, irritating to have misread the main contest, close as it was. No cigar for me, either.

Why did Brexit Party lose at Peterborough?

In my previous blogging on the specific subject of this by-election, and on other topics, I have made the point that the UK now has cities (including London) where the white population (let alone the British white population) is less than 50%. Peterborough still has, supposedly, about 80% white population, but at least 10% are from other parts of Europe. The white British part of the population is below 70% of the whole, possibly as low as 60%.

There is also the point that the city and constituency are not delineated the same; part of the city is not within the constituency.

When a city has more than a token non-white presence, a nationalist party of any kind will struggle to win elections there, and that applies even if (as is the case with Brexit Party) the party is not social-national, has no racial or ethnic principles or policies, and even if (as with Brexit Party) some of its actual candidates are black or brown.

It is not only that, in general, the “blacks and browns” will not vote for even a mildly (and notionally) “patriotic” party such as Brexit Party (let alone a social-national party) because they fear that party. The point is that the vast majority of ethnic minority voters have little or no real connection with Britain, its society, its history, its culture etc. They are, in a word, alien to Britain. Look at how even those adhering to the far-longer-standing Jewish community are always “threatening” (“promising”?) to flee from the UK if their demands are not met. They are not really rooted here; the roots of the “blacks and browns” are shallower yet.

Thus, in Peterborough, one can surmise that few blacks, Muslims etc voted Brexit Party. Why should they? Why would they? Brexit Party is hardly the British National Party. It offers no implied threat to the minorities, but it is broadly conservative-nationalist in ethos, and that is enough for the ethnic minorities to vote elsewhere, mainly for Labour.

I have been blogging and tweeting for several years about how the UK part of the “Great Replacement” (of whites by non-whites) means that elections become a no-win situation in much of the UK. That was true, for example, in the Stoke-on-Trent Central constituency in 2017. In the by-election of that year, Gareth Snell, a spotty unpleasant Twitter troll, was the Labour candidate. Paul Nuttall stood for UKIP. Snell beat Nuttall, Labour beat UKIP, by only 2,620 votes. The Pakistani Muslim community locally, numbering over 6,000,  almost all (always) vote Labour, a cohesion enforced by dodgy postal ballots and “community” exhortations (eg in local mosques) to vote Labour. Local Muslims 6,000+, Labour majority 2,620…

In other words, without those 6,000 or more Muslims (and others), Nuttall and UKIP would have won Stoke-on-Trent Central easily. As it was, UKIP faded and, at the General Election of 2017, Labour won again, against the Conservatives in 2nd place. Labour won by 3,897 votes. Point made, I think.

Now look at Peterborough. The postal votes were very high (who knows who really fills in the forms?) but even leaving that aside, we see that Brexit Party lost to Labour by 683, in a constituency where the non-European ethnic minorities number perhaps as many as 20,000. “It was the w**s wot won it!”, to paraphrase the famous Sun headline of 1992.

Non-white ethnic minority population in the constituency—10,000-20,000. Votes for Labour in the by-election—10,484

In fact, Labour only won Peterborough by 607 votes at the 2017 General Election, thus propelling useless African ex-“solicitor” Fiona Onasanya into Parliament.

The Future

Labour is, as I have often noted before, now the party, in terms of core vote, of the ethnic minorities (excluding Jews), of the metropolitan “socially liberal” types, of public service workers or officials. The real hard core is mainly the blacks and browns, and the public service people. Labour struggles to win votes wider than that core. Labour won Peterborough in the by-election on a vote-share of only 31%.

Brexit Party has suffered a bad blow. Had it won at Peterborough, its momentum would have carried on. Now, its future seems unclear. It may continue and may yet win seats, but Peterborough was a very good chance despite the ethnic minority vote, and Brexit Party fluffed it.

The LibDems almost quadrupled their 2017 3.3% vote to about 12%, but are still well behind the 2010 days of “Cleggmania”, in which they scored nearly 20% at Peterborough. My opinion? There will be no LibDem revival, at least not on a big scale. Most voters are getting angry. “Centrism” is not the flavour of the times.

The Conservatives were the big losers, as in the EU elections. They achieved what might be regarded as, had it been elsewhere, a respectable 3rd place on a vote-share of 21%, 7,243 votes, only 3,000 or so behind the Labour victor; but Peterborough has mainly been a Conservative seat since 1945. It had a Conservative MP as recently as 2 years ago.

If this result were to be replicated nationwide, there would be little left of the Conservative bloc in the House of Commons. Seats would fall either to Brexit Party, or to Labour (or in a few cases, to LibDems).

Final words

Strategically, a Brexit Party win would have been my preference, in that, down the line, it would expedite the break-up of the “LibLabCon” “three main parties” scam. Having said that, the Conservatives were rightly cast down, while at least the Labour MP elected seems to be to some extent against the Jewish Zionists (though pretty invertebrate when “challenged” on that).

Tweets etc

https://twitter.com/KTHopkins/status/1136962411666321410

Below, illustrating my point that Labour’s core vote is now “the blacks and browns”

Notes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterborough_(UK_Parliament_constituency)#Elections_in_the_2010s

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoke-on-Trent_Central_(UK_Parliament_constituency)

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2019/05/09/notes-from-the-peterborough-by-election/

https://gab.com/Fosfoe/posts/YldMYkx4cXRRdlpGM2NqWE40QjNYZz09

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa_Forbes_(politician)

https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/peterboroughs-new-mayor-says-prison-stint-should-be-forgotten-as-he-prepares-to-become-citys-first-citizen/

http://participator.online/articles/2019/06/peterborough_byelection_postal_voting_questions_20190611.php

https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1140260185446989824