Tag Archives: Shomrim

Diary Blog, 23 March 2026

Morning music

Talking point

[“Professor Jiang — the man nicknamed “The Professor” because he is truly one of the most dangerous geopolitical minds in the world — revealed to Tucker Carlson words you will not hear anywhere else:

Iran’s war is an American quagmire with no bottom… China is the biggest long-term loser… and the UAE will be affected in a way no one expected.

This man is not an ordinary analyst. He predicted Trump’s victory years ago — and he won. He predicted America entering a war with Iran — and it did. And today, he speaks about the future with the same confidence.

  1. Iran War = Second Ukraine
    The war will be long and exhausting. No side will admit defeat.
    America is stuck between two bad options: withdrawal = collapse of prestige… continuation = endless bleeding.
    My view: this is exactly what happened in Ukraine. Americans have no exit strategy, only an entry strategy.
  2. Why can’t America exit?
    Iran will demand $1 trillion in compensation + complete US withdrawal from the region.
    If America withdraws:

Gulf states will become clients of Iran.

Petrodollar will collapse.

America — with $39 trillion in debt — will face a real economic collapse.
The point no one talks about: America is not fighting for Iran… it is fighting so it does not collapse itself.

  1. Iran’s smart plan — $800 billion per year
    Iran plans to impose a 10% passage fee on every ship crossing the Strait of Hormuz.

    Expected revenue: $800 billion per year.
    This amount will rebuild Iran stronger than before.
    If this is correct — and I see it as not far-fetched — Iran will emerge from the war richer than it entered.
  2. The biggest loser is not America — but China
    China imports 40% of its energy from the Gulf.
    Its economy is entirely built on cheap energy.
    Even artificial intelligence — which everyone talks about — requires cheap energy.
    Any disruption in energy supplies will hit China more than any other country.
    And what no one notices: the war in Iran is not just an American war — it is a war on China’s future as a great power.
  3. The real beneficiaries? Israel and Russia
    Israel:

Wants “Greater Israel” from the Nile to the Euphrates.

Draining America in a long war = pushing it out of the region.

Weakening the Gulf = removing any competitor.
Russia:

America lifted sanctions on Russian oil (130 million barrels).

Russia sells its oil at record prices.

And finances its war in Ukraine from America’s pocket.
In short: America is paying for others’ wars while thinking it is winning.

  1. The religious factor — the hidden power no one talks about
    There are religious factions in Israel and America that genuinely believe this war is a prelude to the return of Christ.
    Blowing up Al-Aqsa Mosque and building the Third Temple is part of the plan.
    Netanyahu and Trump — according to Professor Jiang — are just tools in a project far older than them.
    This is one of the most dangerous statements in the episode, because when political decisions are driven by end-of-the-world ideology — there is no room for rationality.
  2. The ground invasion is coming — a new Vietnam
    America is considering sending 2,000 Marines to control Kharg Island (90% of Iranian oil exports).
    But Professor Jiang said clearly: “You can take it, but you cannot hold it.”
    What begins with 2,000 soldiers could end with half a million — just like in Vietnam.
  3. Weakening the UAE — the bubble is about to burst
    Dubai was built on the illusion of security.
    Simple Iranian strikes revealed the model’s fragility entirely.
    What was a “safe haven” became a target. And the confidence upon which all those towers were built is eroding.
    The UAE will not “end” — but its economic model will be severely shaken, because everything is based on the assumption of regional security — and that assumption has collapsed.
  4. Japan will recover — and China will decline
    Professor Jiang literally said: “If I had a billion dollars — I would put it all in Japan.”
    Japan has historically risen from anything: the Mongols, World War II, nuclear bombs.
    China, however: agricultural, closed, and unable to adapt to the new era.
  5. The West is collapsing from within
    Europe, Canada, and Australia are experiencing deliberate demographic change.
    The “democracy” that emerges looks more like the “organized demolition” of Western civilization.
    And the question: who is driving this? No one has a clear answer.

Conclusion
What Professor Jiang said tonight:
America is stuck in a quagmire it cannot escape.
Iran will return stronger after the war.
Israel achieves its expansionist dream.
China will be the biggest loser.
And the West destroys itself.

The remaining question:
If Professor Jiang predicted Trump’s victory and the start of the war — and he was correct…
Will his predictions today come true?
“]

Worth thinking about.

Tweets seen

See also:

Written and published on the blog 8 years ago, in 2018. I think that it still stands up pretty well.

On the face of it; though what Trump may say on day 1 may be the opposite of what he says on day 2, and both may be different than what he does on day 3 [etc].

For once, I agree with Hodges.

[“Ritter: The new US and Israel stance towards Iran could trigger a global catastrophe:

Israel and the US have now realized that regime change in Iran is not possible, the Iranian government will survive this conflict. Therefore, they are now trying to impoverish the Iranian authorities and everything they control. They aim to inflict long-term damage on Iran’s ability to produce gas, oil, and energy and to generate revenue from it. Iran has stated that it will not be the only country to go down this path. Therefore, I believe this is the beginning of one of the greatest mistakes. Conditions are being created for a global catastrophe,” emphasized military analyst and former US Marine Corps intelligence officer Scott Ritter.”]

The U.S. Congress is 99% “occupied”:

Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham etc have blood on their hands, and gold in their pockets.

The facts speak for themselves, so there is little need to use such descriptive phrases as “fifth column” or “a state within a state“.

Having said that, there are other private ambulances in the UK, which may or may not (I do not know) also offer emergency cover.

I myself have only had private healthcare (insurance) in the past when living overseas at times (former Soviet Union, Caribbean), or travel insurance, and never had to call upon it.

I have no reason to suppose that such Jewish ambulance services would ignore a non-Jew suffering in front of the operatives concerned —if for example there were a car accident right in front of the private ambulance when it had not already been booked— but most people only have the option of calling a normal NHS 999 ambulance or paramedic.

English/British (i.e. non-Jew) citizens would not even know the emergency or other numbers for these “Hatzola” ambulances.

I am guessing, admittedly, but surely only Jews, and in certain areas of London, Manchester etc, would know those emergency numbers, and thus be in a position to appeal for help in the first place.

So it would seem that they are not —100%— “apartheid“-style Jewish-only services, but probably, admittedly at a guess, 99% so. If anyone knows differently, comment appropriately, and I may publish the comment or correction on the blog.

#MoralHighGround.

Of course, none of the above justifies the destruction of the “Hatzola” ambulances, any more than it would justify, mutatis mutandis, the destruction of private ambulances belonging to, say, BUPA or other private healthcare provider.

After all, if Jews in certain areas are using their Jewish ambulances, it must mean that they are not using NHS ambulances, thus ipso facto helping the non-Jew communities by not stretching the NHS skeleton service even more.

Still, it does show what a fractured society this now is, and how some people, some communities, are more privileged than others.

Finally, I note that £600,000-£700,000 has already been raised by Jews in order to replace the destroyed vehicles. Imagine that level of resource being available, within a few hours at that, to ordinary English/British communities…

Well, that information is new to me.

Incidentally, and at least according to Google, “Achdus” seems to mean “day”, and “shacharis” seems to mean Jewish morning prayer services, presumably part of Israeli army routine.

[“Mossad’s plan to destabilize Iran has failed

The idea to bring the Iranian people to uprising was proposed by the head of Israeli intelligence David Barnea during the preparation stage for the military operation. Later, he presented it to Netanyahu, and in mid-January — to Trump, writes The New York Times.

According to the publication, the conviction that the US and Israel could provoke a mass uprising was a key miscalculation in the preparation for the war. Three weeks after its start, no uprising occurred in Iran.”]

Unsurprising that the plan failed. For one thing, when a country is under external attack, most citizens tend to rally round the flag; secondly, the Iranian regime seems to have killed or imprisoned tens of thousands of its most active opponents, and to have done so within the past few months. A third factor may be (again, merely guessing from what I have read) that the Iranian counter-espionage groups have rolled-up many suspected MOSSAD, Aman, and CIA networks on the ground.

That does seem strange. After all, this was an act of criminal damage. Vehicle insurance should cover that, regardless of any (supposed) Iranian “terror” aspects. The insurers might try to wriggle out but surely a normal insurance policy would cover criminal damage, which is basically what this was.

Also, the UK Government is now going to stump up monies to buy new ambulances, while the normal ambulance service for English/British people is being cut back to nothing? Certainly gives the impression of prioritization of the Jewish community over the English/British…

Anyway, I read that well over £600,000 had already been raised by Jewish groups. Was that inaccurate? If not, why is the government wasting taxpayer money on vehicles not really available for most citizens, and when monies have already been raised anyway?

A totally incompetent and totally “occupied” Labour Friends of Israel government, headed by “Starmer-stein”.

Late tweets seen

Even some of the Jews (the more cultured and nuanced Jews) are appalled by the Jewish settler gangs in the West Bank. Murderers and terrorists.

[“I am adamant that every White Person in the world has been psyoped in one way or another over the years when jewish influence has been at its height.

It is now we put our differences aside, and come together as one to claim sovereignty of our nations once more.

I don’t believe that most people who advocate for communism want communism, just as much as I don’t believe that most people who advocate for fascism want fascism.

What we can all universally agree on is that we want freedom. Freedom is what we want, and so desperately need.

The left need to give up their open borders fairy tale and the right need to give up on their “American dream” for this to happen.

Globalism and usury need to perish.

Britain for the British, Europe for Europeans. Whites for the Anglosphere.

No more immigration. Loads of remigration. Total remigration.”]

As Jack London once said, “I am a socialist, but a white man first“. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_London.

Is he wrong? Even the migration invasion cannot be stopped, or at any rate is not being stopped.

Late music

[Ludlow Castle]

Diary Blog, 17 February 2026

Afternoon music

[Norwich Cathedral cloisters]

Tweets seen

They have had their own fake “police” force, called the “Shomrim”, for many years. North London heavily Jewish areas, such as Barnet. They drive vehicles made up to look like real police cars. If any other group did that, they would be prosecuted.

So speaks one Jacob Collier, 28-y-o MP for Burton and Uttoxeter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Collier_(politician). Looking at the voting history and statistics, I doubt that he will be MP beyond the present Parliament, so he may not be laughing at Reform UK for very much longer: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burton_and_Uttoxeter#Elections_in_the_2020s.

“Free poppadoms for all! Free chicken curry for all Gorton and Denton (Labour) voters!

Not a white face there…

Bar of England and Wales

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15558043/Starmers-great-friend-shared-8MILLION-pot-earnings-work-Chagos-surrender-deal.html

A close friend of Sir Keir Starmer shared an £8 million pot for his work negotiating the Chagos Islands ‘surrender’ deal to cede the territory to Mauritius, the Daily Mail can reveal.

Philippe Sands KC, who describes himself as a ‘great friend’ of the Prime Minister, pocketed his share of the sum while acting as chief legal counsel to Mauritius between 2010 and 2024.”

[Daily Mail]

“Sands was born in London on 17 October 1960 to Jewish parents.”

[Wikipedia]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippe_Sands

Every. Single. Time.

More tweets seen

The Greens, in the oft-seen Leninist term (usually misunderstood, however) are both infantile and disordered. Bad-joke politics, but (as one has seen with with Lab and Con over the past half-century and especially since 1989) that might not prevent them actually exercizing power and ruining society (even more), if the socio-political conditions were to become favourable.

Real “green” politics are different: see

[“Heil Goering!“— German cartoon from early 1930s, when National Socialist Germany, firstly in Prussia, became the first state on Earth to ban cruel experiments on animals]

Late tweets seen

There are one or two English in that crowd. Just one or two, or three. Hello, Robinson Crusoe!

A reference to hard-faced careerist moneygrubber and expenses blodger Antonia Romeo.

More (((propaganda)))

See also:

In that case, the Iranians have nothing to lose by launching an all-out and simultaneous attack on Israel using all available missiles and drones.

Dimona. Ben-Gurion Airport. Tel Aviv and nearby wealthy suburbs.

Late music

Diary Blog, 15 July 2023

Morning music

[Prague, 1930s; Vltava and Charles Bridge in middle distance]

Battles past

Saturday quiz

Well, this week brings me an easy victory over political journalist John Rentoul; he scored only 3/10, compared to my 7/10.

I did not know the answers to questions 2, 5, and 8. In fact, I “hit the post” on questions 2 and 8, and no.5 is arguable, depending on what you class as “a vineyard“, whatever “Wine GB” may say.

From the newspapers

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-12300651/SANTA-MONTEFIORE-reveals-six-months-death-sisters-spirit-sat-bed.html

Interesting.

Twitter

Looks as though curbing the Jew-Zionists, “antifa” idiots, and other would-be censors of freedom of expression, has encouraged better functioning at Twitter, and attracted more users and/or use.

Tweets seen

She is (in my opinion).

They are (in my opinion).

We look back at the Incas, and wonder why their priests had a kind of handball game in which you got executed if you dropped the ball [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoamerican_ballgame#Human_sacrifice]. We look at the Aztecs, and wonder what motivated their bloodthirsty and cruel human sacrifices. Yet we (meaning society as a whole) accept the cruelties and stupidities of our own age as right and proper: “net zero”, “lockdown(s)”, killer “vaccines” and “boosters”, the 2010-2023 “austerity policies”, the importation into the UK of millions of culturally and ethnically backward people; and so on. The full list would be too long to publish today.

I do not like George Osborne at all, but at the same time that very clearly terminally-smug “protester” (a woman aged maybe 60-70) could not have complained had she been hit in the face and/or given a good kicking.

Those “Just Stop Oil” loonies have to be stopped. In fact their sheer smugness (especially the ones aged 60+) is one of the most hateful things about them.

In some ways, British “toleration” is a very good thing, but it goes too far when it becomes toleration of malice and/or evil.

Ha ha! The bastards were not expecting him to drive over them!

If Biden drops dead, or becomes even less compos mentis, that creature would be the U.S. President…hard to believe…

I wonder how long before “the musicians” start to play (again)…

If so, one cretin less in the UK Government…

More music

More tweets seen

I think that the “Community Security Trust” [“CST”] is separate from the “Shomrim” Jewish private police, but I may be wrong.

More from the newspapers

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12296175/Homeless-sleeping-bloodstained-mattresses-migrants-four-star-treatment.html

EXCLUSIVE – A tale of two hotels: How migrants set to be housed in four-stay luxury hotel would be ‘treated’ while homeless people will be put up in cheap hotel so grimy that it shut and was then converted into a hostel”

[Daily Mail]

Britain in 2023…

More tweets

“Antifa” idiots and “refugees welcome” dimwits are, thankfully, only about 1% of the UK population. Get in your tank and roll over them.

I have still not seen anything anywhere indicating where “Dr” Louise Raw obtained her “doctorate” (specialized subject— one strike in 1888). She seems very reticent about it, and about where she obtained it, assuming she did obtain one (and even if the doctorate is genuine, she should not use the title “Dr” in the UK, not being a f/t academic, or clergy, or medical practitioner. It’s infra dig).

Nia Griffith, MP for Llanelli: among other things, a Labour Friends of Israel member, and an expenses cheat who owns three houses and flats, at least one with land. She should be able to accommodate some migrant invaders, surely? Oh, no, wait…

MSM conformity of opinion and news.

Late music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Albert]
[tideline at Truro, Massachusetts, where the composer died in a road accident]

Are the UK Police the New Lawmakers? Where Are the Limits of the Law?

My attention was caught by the Daily Mail report below.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6500245/Thames-Valley-Police-not-punish-caught-heroin-cocaine-controversial-scheme.html

In fact, the practice of not arresting or charging those caught with various “illegal” drugs has been going on for years in the UK. The Thames Valley force may have extended it to a previously unheard-of extent but the rot (if that is what it is) set in decades ago, when some police chiefs decided that the terribly-valuable time of their officers was wasted in arresting persons found in possession of small amounts of cannabis. Subject to correction, I believe that it was London Metropolitan Police officer Brian Paddick [see Notes, below] who, as Borough Commander of the bandit country which included Brixton, first introduced the policy.

Let’s pause right there. A police officer —fairly senior, so be it— decides, arbitrarily, that he is not going to enforce a law, or not always going to do so. There are arguments to be made in favour of decriminalizing some (or all) now-generally-illegal drugs, but that is a decision for the legislature, Parliament, to make, not a police officer.

Now there has always been a measure of “police discretion”, as when (forgive any possible anachronism around a policeman actually patrolling an area and so actually being in a position to catch someone doing something forbidden) a policeman finds a child “scrumping” (technically, stealing) apples or pears from an orchard or garden, that policeman then deciding to deliver a stern on-the-spot warning rather than arresting the child. Likewise, the motorist getting a ticking-off from a traffic cop rather than a speeding ticket for travelling a few miles per hour over the set limit. However, the examples given are minor crimes by any estimation. Possessing forbidden drugs may be considered minor by some, but not by most, even today. That becomes even more so when the drugs are “harder” than marijuana.

There is the other point that a distinction can be made between a policeman deciding to exercize discretion in a particular case, and a policeman (at higher level) deciding not to enforce certain laws as a matter of his own decision and in the geographic area under his command.

This is of course a grey area, but it is troubling when a police force decides, on its own initiative, to abrogate the plain words of valid legislation. True, there are many laws still on the statute books which are no longer applied, crimes which are no longer prosecuted, but they are mostly those which have fallen into desuetude by reason of effluxion of time: one good example of a crime which has not been prosecuted for several hundred years (if ever) is that of “entering the precincts of Parliament while dressed in a suit of armour”. For other bizarre examples, see the links in the Notes, below.

Those old crimes, still technically criminal but never prosecuted, are an amusement. What, however, about things which are not crimes at all, but which the police, under the influence of political correctness or pressure (usually from the Jewish lobby) have decided to treat as crimes or quasi-crimes? Another grey area? I have blogged previously about how Jew-Zionists made malicious complaint against me to Essex Police (about 2 years ago, in late 2016/early 2017):

https://ianrmillard.wordpress.com/2017/07/13/when-i-was-a-victim-of-a-malicious-zionist-complaint/

In that case, the police were notionally acting in pursuance of a wrongheaded, badly-drafted but technically valid and quite recent law: Communications Act 2003, s.127, but were trying to stretch its ambit so that views expressed which were dissenting, dissident, controversial and (according to some Jews, at least) “offensive”, became “grossly offensive” and so could in principle be caught by the Act.

In “my case”, the prosecution never happened because (it now appears) the Crown Prosecution Service [CPS] (and at a high level, in Whitehall…) took the commonsense view that a successful prosecution was both unlikely to succeed and not in the public interest. Leaks from the police, however, now make plain that some of their officers were completely in the pocket of an aggressive Jewish-Zionist cabal (the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” or “CAA”); one police officer in particular seems to have acted effectively as an advocate on behalf of the CAA to the CPS, advocating for me and others (persons unknown to me) to be prosecuted. He lost his professional objectivity completely, it seems; thankfully (for me and for the rule of law) he was over-ruled. Bitter herbs for him, perhaps.

The “Campaign Against Antisemitism” or “CAA” is now itself the subject of various police investigations around misuse of its charitable status; also, as some readers will be aware, one of its leading members, Stephen Silverman, was said (it was admitted) in open court (and by the CAA’s own lawyer) to have been an anonymous (pseudonymous) and sadistic Internet troll who stalked various women online.

More recently, in Summer 2018, I was harassed by a police constable based at Barnet, North London (which is effectively occupied territory), at the behest of a Jewish woman who had been firmly put in her place by Andrew Torba, CEO of the online GAB platform. That Jewish individual had demanded that Torba remove various accounts from his GAB platform (which is based in USA and Caribbean) and she had had the gall to threaten Torba online and publicly with “Scotland Yard”! Torba posted all the conversation on GAB and told her in very blunt terms to, er, “get lost”! Many GAB and Twitter account-holders also told her to “get lost”!

I was accused of having reposted one reply to that woman from Torba (which repost would in fact not be a crime in the UK anyway), but that did not stop PC…well, let’s just call him Plod…from sending me an (undated!) “Warning Notice” re. “harassment”, which under English law has to consist of at least two incidents, both of which have to be unlawful, whereas here was one (alleged) incident and that entirely lawful even on its face!

It was clear to me that the Jewish Zionist woman complainant, smarting from the whipping given to her online by Andrew Torba, had decided to make an entirely malicious complaint against me. I should add that she is or was a member or supporter of the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” and at one time used to tweet prolifically and negatively about me. The point is that the police should have realized that her complaint was both malicious and had no basis at all in law. They did not. They chose not to. Very alarming…

It is worrying when the police not only do not know the law they purport to be applying, but actually try to continue to insist that what is not the law actually is! Plod not only telephoned me at least once, but emailed me intimidatingly (as he thought) and, as said, sent a semi-literate, undated and completely ineffective (legally ineffective) “Warning Notice” to me.

What made that incident worse was the feeling that the police in Barnet were running wild and were not acting properly under law. I heard (though this was never confirmed) that “the said Jewish woman” is the ex-wife of one of the “Shomrim” faux-police or private Jewish police, who are based, it has been said online (correctly or not), at the building(s) of the Barnet Police! A private tribal militia operating out of London police stations? It would have been thought incredible only a few years ago.

I could have taken the above-mentioned matter further via official complaint against PC Plod, who, in my view, came close to committing “misconduct in a public office”, but contented myself with writing a detailed letter both to the Borough Commander in Barnet and to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner. Even then, after some time, Plod harassed me via email once more! Only when I provided a face-saving way for him to get lost, did he.

I perceive a degree of drift here: the police deciding not to apply some laws on a blanket basis, in other cases as good as making up the law as they go along. Taken further, those tendencies could together collapse the rule of law in the UK entirely.

Notes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Paddick,_Baron_Paddick

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3107160/No-armour-Parliament-never-handle-salmon-suspiciously-drunk-pub-ILLEGAL-Bizarre-Medieval-laws-stand-Britain-today.html

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/uk-strangest-weird-laws-enforced-christopher-sargeant-sturgeon-armour-a7232586.html

https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/private-lives/religion/overview/witchcraft/

https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06411

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/dec/03/police-harassment-warning-notices-diane-louise-jordan

http://www.heritageanddestiny.com/revealed-how-britains-leading-jews-lobbied-prime-minister-to-block-faurisson-and-leuchter/

Update, 24 January 2019

https://www.infowars.com/uk-hate-crime-police-investigate-mans-thinking-after-he-criticized-transgenderism/

https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/news/grimsby-news/humberside-police-transgender-twitter-thinking-2466084

Update, 20 May 2019

I saw a couple of Peter Hitchens articles…

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7019091/PETER-HITCHENS-country-slowly-choked-death-rights-wrongdoers.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6993553/PETER-HITCHENS-time-view-police-just-like-failed-industries.html

and this: it seems that the police now see fit to interfere in actual elections!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7046749/Politicians-tone-Euro-vote-speeches-avoid-stoking-hate-crime-says-police-chief.html