Tag Archives: Israeli influence

Diary Blog, 17 November 2025

Afternoon music

[Akademgorodok, Novosibirsk, Western Siberia]

Tweets seen

No real English/British people voted for any immigration.

Goodwin and other Reform types will not admit that the illegal migration is only 5%-10% of the whole, and so is only one part of the problem. “Legal” migration is far bigger. Then there is the disguised migration— births to non-Europeans and to European women impregnated by non-Europeans.

Stop it all.

Sack them all.

Translates to a Commons with about 430 Reform MPs, 56 Lab, 44 LibDem, 42 SNP, 30 Greens, 13 Cons.

It has been clear for at least a year that the once-great Conservative Party is on the way out. By the time of the next general election, many of the long-term loyalist voters of the Con Party will no longer be around. They are the backbone of the Con vote.

I went into a small village shop recently, and there, holding forth to the shopkeeper and his wife, was some old lady of, I should imagine, about 90, certainly around that age. She was saying that people on “Jobseeker’s”, i.e. unemployment benefit, should be cut off after 3 months. Utterly moronic, and echoing the propaganda of the part-Jews David Cameron-Levita and George Osborne 10-15 years ago. There you have the sort of voter who might even now stick with the Con Party, or maybe move to Reform (if she lives that long).

I should not be surprised to see the Con Party vote at the next general election decline to around 10%, especially if Reform continues to hold pole position.

Yes, and one (((foreign influence))) in particular.

I bet that most of the abortions are of white English/British.

A few “squads, walls, and ends” would put the untermenschen in their place before they can be removed permanently from our society.

As if a Pakistani woman, elevated far above her abilities, is going to be interested in responding properly to that.

Britain’s toytown police state once again.

When a police woodentop came to my door about 18 months ago and in relation to alleged tweets, the first thing he said, after explaining it was about tweets reported (somehow, by an anonymous someone), was that I need not worry, because the matter had been marked “NFA— No Further Action“.

One might ask, if a matter has already been designated “No Further Action“, surely there is then no need for a uniformed constable to visit the alleged tweeter at his home in the first place? Or was that a British equivalent of the implied threats made to dissidents in the late Soviet Union, or the DDR/East Germany? i.e. “be careful what you write! We are watching”

Imagine wasting supposedly scarce police resources on that.

I might add that in fact I was expelled from Twitter in 2018, at the instigation of a pack of Jews connected with the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”], and have, therefore, not tweeted anything at all since then. I notified the policeman of that fact, and he reluctantly accepted it; he then went away thanking me, though he did not salute me as he should have done (only —sort-of— joking…).

More tweets

More about the dishonest, negligent, incompetent, self-publicizing Jew solicitor Mark Lewis, and the (mainly if not entirely Jewish) Patron Law firm. For more about the egregious Lewis, use the search box on the blog.

Don’t expect decency or honesty from “them”, and then you will not be disappointed.

More tweets

https://greghadfield.medium.com/repeal-section-127-deeply-flawed-law-legislation-that-police-use-to-stifle-free-speech-2205a3dd8be8

Well worth reading.

Incidentally, the problem with such abuse of the law (“lawfare”), and the abusive law itself (Communications Act 2003, s.127) does not lie mainly with the police but with the Jew-Zionist cabals that have managed to influence, persuade, demand, wheedle, bribe, or suborn the police and the (now-thankfully-doomed) “police and crime commissioners”.

We are talking not about Jews in general but about that tiny activist, and fanatically pro-Israel, element. Out of around 250,000 or more Jews in the UK, only a few hundred, at most, are active in the said cabals (such as the “CAA”).

Some of my own experiences:

Late tweets seen

Late music

[1941— German soldier fraternizes with Parisienne by the Jardins du Trocadero]

Diary Blog, 7 October 2025, with thoughts about Gaza, the proscription of Palestine Action, and the Jewish/Israeli influence on the Starmer misgovernment

Morning music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doreen_Carwithen]
[Basingstoke Canal, southern England, in Autumn; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basingstoke_Canal]

Tweets seen

Not much different in the UK, except in terms of scale.

Starmer-stein is far from being the only UK politician more or less under (((control))), but he is, after all, the person currently posing as Prime Minister.

Incidentally, that U.S. Congressman featured above, Jake Auchincloss, is a half-Jew anyway: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jake_Auchincloss#Early_life_and_education; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jake_Auchincloss#Israel

Take a look at this, about David Cameron-Levita, too:

Once again, Cameron (Cameron-Levita) is himself both a member of Conservative Friends of Israel, and a part-Jew.

More tweets

I hope so, if only because it will show that “their” money and consequent political influence will be resisted.

Would translate to a Commons with about 438 Reform MPs, 74 Lab, 54 LibDem, 36 SNP, and 20 Cons (etc).

Reinforces the previous ~125 opinion polls over the past year.

Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan.

Deliberately insane.

Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan.

And which group do you think is behind most of that?…

“Them”.

…and the Jew-Zionist/Israel lobby.

[“NEW: A source very close to the senior leadership of MI6 has got in contact. They wanted to make public the opposition within the intelligence agency to the proscription of Palestine Action. Senior figures are said to feel it is a distraction from the battle against real terrorist threat – and should never have happened. The source has been verified.“]

The proscription of Palestine action was and is absurd. They are mostly totally harmless people; the few who are not commit acts of politically-motivated vandalism, aided by the apparent fact that the RAF and others seem incapable of guarding their sites properly. There are already laws in place to deter or punish criminal damage, conspiracy to commit criminal damage, burglary etc.

The only reason that the Palestine Action group was proscribed was because Israel, via its publicity and “lawfare” fronts in the UK (eg the malicious “Campaign Against Antisemitism” or “CAA” cabal), pressured weak Starmer and other Labour Friends of Israel members presently in Cabinet to do it.

See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blaise_Metreweli; also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta_Ramsay,_Baroness_Ramsay_of_Cartvale. “[Meta Ramsay] is the chair of Labour Friends of Israel in the House of Lords.[9][10]” [Wikipedia].

The absurd thing is, of course, that the tiny number of people actively involved in “direct action” against Israeli targets, or targets involved with helping Israel, in the UK, will not be in the slightest deterred from their actions by the proscription of, in effect, a name.

Hundreds of thousands of civilians killed or badly injured, not to mention driven out of their modest homes which have now been flattened, and the neighbourhoods simply erased.

Every day, hundreds more killed, yet the newspapers in the UK prioritized the death by shooting of two Jewish guards at a synagogue in the UK, one of whom seems in fact to have been shot by the police.

The Gaza flattening goes beyond even most of the similar destruction in WW2. It is Biblical in its genocidal extent. The Roman destruction of Carthage also comes to mind— the symbolic sowing of salt in the ground, and then plowing of the ground where Carthage had stood.

As to the USA, for me it lost any right it still retained to call itself “home of freedom” etc when it embarked on its post-2001 programmes of secret abductions, concentration camps, and torture. All done in collaboration with the Jewish state, *Israel, and with the connivance of Jews and pro-Zionists across the U.S. Federal Government.

More tweets seen

Hardy-ha-ha. Cameron-Levita was always ready, as Prime Minister, to throw money at bureaucratic “aid” projects, yet his government was the one that really weaponized hatred of the sick, disabled, and unemployed, and indeed the elderly (“bedroom tax” etc)…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedroom_tax

The lady tweeter, once “employed” by her MP husband (now ex-MP and ex-husband) via his bloated expenses, likes to pretend that she represents a political faction she calls, or miscalls, the “Moderates”. I have previously speculated as to whether the membership of the “Moderates” exists (beyond the lines of empty bottles in her kitchen). I doubt it.

“Compassionate Conservatism” was always a lie. Now it is a bad joke.

Typical black, though. Thinks that, so long as she keeps talking, or talking over the interviewer, and even if talking nonsense, people will think her both intelligent and plausible. Lammy is no different.

Looking at that Conservative Conference audience, once you take away the journalists and lobbyists, those sitting there are mostly about 80 years old, for one thing, and completely unresponsive to the speaker (unsurprising, since it was Mel Stride).

Both Dan Hodges and Owen Jones in the realms of fantasy. In reality, “neo-Nazis” are not “beating people up“. Most of the UK political violence you see is from the “antifa” dupes of Jew-Zionism, or from Islamist crazies, and the former at least is something that Owen Jones supports, as does Dan Hodges, in my opinion.

Late tweets

I predicted that on the blog months ago, in January or February.

The top issue which impacts every other important issue.

[“Dizen: The European Union has no future – it is finished, a gradual disintegration also awaits NATO The EU has exhausted both its economic potential and has long ceased to bring any dividends to its members. Now those who lead it are trying to replace the language of mutual benefit with ideology and Russophobia. They propose increasing military spending, militarizing European societies, and the prospect of a great war instead of friendship with neighbors and shared prosperity. The people in the EU did not vote for this. The appropriate question is: aren’t the USA interested in a united Europe? They are, but Washington sees a united Europe as a competitor. Of course, it does not wish it harm, because it wants allies in European countries. However, the USA encourages internal conflicts because it benefits from a divided Europe. Therefore, I do not think the EU will last much longer. PROFESSOR Glen Dizen of the University of South-Eastern Norway assessed that the European Union has exhausted its own future, and that the prospects for the NATO pact are not at all rosy. Asked whether the European Union has a future or whether internal contradictions will prevail over the idea of a united and strong Europe and lead to the bloc’s disintegration, he said: – The EU has no future; it is finished. Not this year or next, but certainly in our lifetime. The European Union was born in the unique circumstances of the conflict between the West and the Soviet Union. Now, in the context of the transition to multipolarity, Europeans are losing unity because member states have gained more freedom. In this context, the gap between the interests of individual players becomes more obvious: for example, the security interests of Latvia have very little in common with those of Greece. Dizen further points out: “As for the economy, the EU has also exhausted its potential and has long ceased to bring any dividends to its members. Now those who lead it are trying to replace the language of mutual benefit with ideology and Russophobia. They propose increasing military spending, militarizing European societies, and the prospect of a great war instead of friendship with neighbors and shared prosperity. The people in the EU did not vote for this. – Even Germany, one of the key EU countries, has already begun to protest and seek a more important role in determining European policy. Essentially, this is a protest against the attempts of Brussels bureaucrats led by von der Leyen to tie all decisions to themselves. East, West, North, South — most EU countries are not ready to give up their sovereignty to some supranational body. They understand that this would result in discrimination against their interests. Therefore, fragmentation within the EU is growing. – Of course, the appropriate question is whether the USA are not interested in a united Europe? They are interested, but Washington sees a united Europe as a competitor. Of course, it does not wish it harm, because it wants allies in European countries. However, the USA encourages internal conflicts because it benefits from a divided Europe. Therefore, I do not think the EU will last much longer. Dizen answers the question of what awaits NATO as follows: — Paradoxically, the alliance also faces gradual disintegration. The USA have realized that they have lost the ability to “dominate” the world. Therefore, they are forced to choose: either to deal with European quarrels or to focus all their forces on a dangerous rival, China, which is becoming more and more confident. In this, of course, the Old World is less important. That is, the alliance leader, who held everything together, is slowly leaving them. And without the Americans, European countries will remember their mutual grievances and drown in mutual conflicts.“]

It is clear that the USA no longer, in the American phrase, “has Europe’s back“.

What goes around comes around”

Late music

[painting by Victor Ostrovsky]

Diary Blog, 14 May 2024

Afternoon music

[Villa Borghese park, Rome]

Tweets seen

Answer: NO.

Hard, in a sense, to see what that snake-oil salesman would add to Reform UK’s limited popular appeal, especially after his recent frenzied pro-Israel soundbites, but then I am not a typical voter. Parties need leaders, either that or at least figureheads.

If Farage takes up the reins of Reform UK, and if that boosts its vote-share from last week’s 18% to 26%, and if the extra 8 points come equally out of the Con and Lab vote-share, leaving Cons on 14%, Labour on 44%, LibDems on 9% and Greens on 7%, the result might be Labour with 490 Commons seats, Reform UK with 57, LibDem 55, Con 6, and Greens 2. [calculation via Electoral Calculus https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/userpoll.html].

Is that possible? The uncertainty alone speaks volumes. It seems impossible… and yet…

That would put Reform UK into Parliament as second-largest party, and official Opposition. As for the Conservative Party, 6 MPs and a very very poor fourth place; for them, it would probably mean the end of the road.

If Sunak, the little Indian money-juggler, were to lose his seat, he would not even have to find a reason to relocate, with his immensely rich wife, to California. If so, good riddance.

Even were Labour to ebb to 40%, and the Cons to recover to 18% (where one opinion poll had them last week), that would still leave the Cons with a mere 35 MPs (Lab 435, LibDems 58, Greens 2, but Reform UK with 79 MPs!

A party has to get well beyond 20% to get any seats at all under the UK’s FPTP voting system, but if it can get 25%+, it may hit the jackpot.

We shall have to wait and see, but the situation looks dire for the treacherous and incompetent Con Party, and I doubt whether the latest pseudo-1940 “fight on the beaches” appeal, featuring the Indian money-juggler and the Jew Shapps (he of the 5 fake identities and the Israeli Bnai Brith membership) will do anything, except confirm that the voters will vote “ABC” (“Anywhere But Conservative”).

Talking point

I happened to be out early in the car this morning, and tuned in to the Radio 4 Today Programme for a few minutes. I caught most (I think) of an interview with a retired general, only a year older than me: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Shirreff.

The general seemed to want, or want to risk, a war with Russia, and seemed totally signed-up to support for “Ukraine” (the Kiev regime). He wants “the Ukrainians” (Kiev regime) to be given more and more-powerful weapons, so that they can attack Russia, and far deeper inside Russia.

That’s what you do in war, attack the enemy“, proclaimed the desk warrior (his only active “war” command a few months in the Gulf in 1991, as a major, and aged 36).

When the interviewer hesitantly wondered whether that might lead to all-out war between NATO and the Russian Federation, he seemed sanguine about that awful possibility.

The general also seemed to miss the point that, while the Jew-Zionist regime in Kiev may be at war with the Russian Federation, we in the UK are not…; not yet, anyway, no thanks to people like him.

Britain has not been well-served by its chocolate soldiers of recent times, and it seems to me that their very limited-in-scope yet gung-ho pseudo-macho posturing might yet lead this country into becoming the target of Russia’s vast nuclear arsenal.

More tweets

Talking point

More tweets

My 2019 assessment of Esther McVey: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/10/03/deadhead-mps-an-occasional-series-the-esther-mcvey-story/.

Late tweets

When I started at the (English) Bar in 1993 (I had been Called to the Bar a couple of years before that but was living in the USA), I did some criminal cases, mostly in the magistrates’ courts in London, and also some Crown Court trials. Most of the defendants were non-white. To some extent, that reflected the rather rackety chambers I was in, but not only that; most serious criminal defendants in London were non-white, mostly West Indian. That must be even more so in 2024, over 30 years later. That, despite the fact that, in 1993/1994, the proportion of non-whites in London was probably only about 10% to 20% (it’s 46% in 2024).

As for relatively recent migrants, say those who have “arrived” in the past two decades, it is hardly surprising that they commit a huge amount of crime: most are young or youngish men, few even speak English beyond a “pidgin” level, few have any marketable skills, and few have any money (though they must have had some previously in order to have been able to buy their passage from the people-smugglers).

Russia only needed one crack in Ukraine’s defenses to increase its vulnerability – The New York Times.

Recent Russian offensives in eastern and northeastern Ukraine are beginning to “dangerously” change the geometry of the front for Kyiv. The “sudden” breakthrough of Russian troops in Ocheretino illustrated how even a small crack in the defense line can cause a cascading effect, threatening already stretched platoons of the Ukrainian Armed Forces with encirclement from the flanks, writes The New York Times.

The publication spoke with Ukrainian soldiers and commanders on the front line. They acknowledged that they were in a more vulnerable position than at any time since the “first harrowing weeks” of the conflict.

Moscow is trying to use the window of opportunity that has opened. Its army is increasing pressure in the Donbass and is seeking to open a new front by attacking Ukrainian positions along the northern border near Kharkov.

According to the publication, months of delays in American assistance, a growing number of casualties and an acute shortage of ammunition led to dire consequences for the Ukrainian Armed Forces. This is evidenced by the exhausted faces and tired voices of Ukrainian soldiers.

“To be honest, I’m scared,” the commander of a Ukrainian tank battalion told The New York Times. “Because if I don’t have shells, people, equipment with which my people can fight… then this is the end.

A city suffering blackouts has a strange atmosphere. When I relocated (for a year) to Almaty, Kazakhstan, in 1996, blackouts were an everyday occurrence, affecting various areas of the city in turn, even the “Presidentsky District” (the governmental and diplomatic quarter) where I lived. I have blogged in the past about this.

A typical example of the shambolic brutality of the Zelensky dictatorship.

Crowdfunder

https://www.givesendgo.com/GC14J

Late music