These people should be on our side! Europe (and Europeanized Eurasia) against Zionism, Islamism, Chinese hegemonism, and the American-based New World Order!
Other tweets seen
Peter Hitchens does a grand job with a plea for an end to anti-Russian sabre rattling, condemnation of the Afghan shame, & truth about Shirley Williams & David Cameron.
@s017actnow NATO is a bluff. The famous clause 5 allows each nation to take 'such action as it deems necessary' if another member is attacked. US would never have signed it otherwise. Congress might well deem no action at all necessary. https://t.co/cOuNxTAQUU
The sordid history of NATO expansion and the pointless Western recreation of tension in Europe. Almost nothing you have been led to believe about this episode is true: see: https://t.co/uQpbkWbBZx
Indeed, but Hitchens wants to keep his newspaper column, and so will not (I think) ever mention Zionist Occupation Government(s) (aka “ZOG”), the New World Order (NWO) or Bilderberg…[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_meeting]. NATO is on the label, as is “US power”, but the content is NWO…
Why did it take sleaze to make people realise that David Cameron was a disaster? Politicians should fall because their policies are bad. And we should learn from this. Destruction by sleaze teaches us nothing. https://t.co/asgt9DKpqh
1/2 What the Danish mask study actually said,verbatim: '4862 completed the study. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 occurred in 42 participants recommended masks (1.8%) and 53 control participants (2.1%). The between-group difference was −0.3 percentage point' . https://t.co/CzrrsgFy8A
There is a very obvious Jewish strain in the British royal family. You only have to look at some of them. Princess Margaret was the most obvious of all, arguably.
At present it seems more likely than not that the persecuted singer-songwriter, satirist and commentator will be released early, on an electronic tag, next week; so far, she has been in prison for nearly three weeks since her recent conviction and sentence. If she is not so released, either next week or thereafter, she will stay in prison until the latter part of May.
Alison Chabloz is appealing her conviction and sentence; the appeal is likely to be heard, in Crown Court, on or about 3-4 June 2021.
[Alison Chabloz]
More tweets
…When restrictions go, the Bristol model shows only a small rise in infections… (2/3) pic.twitter.com/kLoviz1C91
In reality, almost all of the dictatorial measures taken in 2020 and 2021 in the UK were and are useless in terms of the “panicdemic”, and yet have trashed much of the economy, and much of society as well, including our cherished illusions about being a society under law, and our equally cherished ideas about our civil rights.
Imagine the outrage if white-bashing Oxford University ran a course called 'Dismantling Blackness' or 'Dismantling Jewishness'. https://t.co/SDLwQTrIjn
Convinced that lockdowns work? Read this, you may find it interesting: Covid and the lockdown effect: a look at the evidence https://t.co/wPDx7h4JJ8 via @spectator
Multikulti Britain, 2021. Shows both the slide into near-anarchy under the surface, and also the damage that even a “small” weapon can cause. The calibre of the compact Beretta shown is not noted in that report, but quite likely a .22 (a favourite weapon of MOSSAD in the past).
👍How long before this happens in Britain, integration is a failed project in every European country https://t.co/rhcuJnTNl0
— Lord flashhard/ true Brit (@johns00000) April 15, 2021
I met the academic lawyer and author of that Spiked article, Professor Tettenborn, a couple of times when I was based in Exeter as a practising barrister (2002-2008). In fact we both sat, with a third person, as “Lords of Appeal”, presiding over a moot contested by Exeter University law students in 2002, and held at the city’s historic Guildhall.
[Exeter Guildhall]
[Exeter Guildhall interior]
My one and only time sitting as a “judge”!
In that Spiked piece, Professor Tettenborn says that Alison Chabloz is “an obsessive anti-Semitic headbanger“, which is not true, in my opinion (and that is strange language —even these days— in a serious piece of analysis, surely?). At least the Professor agrees with me that the prosecution(s) of Alison Chabloz has or have been “abusive“.
On the wider point, the fact is that the repression of free speech in the EU and in the UK is almost entirely driven by the Jew-Zionist element.
Alison Chabloz: application for bail pending appeal
Alison Chabloz today applied for bail pending appeal. She was represented, as on previous occasions, by Adrian Davies of Counsel, and the hearing was at Southwark Crown Court before H.H. Judge Tomlinson.
The application was refused, it seems on the ground that, on the facts of the case, it would be impossible to fashion terms of a suitable order that would prevent Alison from “reoffending” in the period between today and the date of the expected appeal hearing.
What that means is that Alison Chabloz remains in custody, though reports from usually-reliable sources indicate that she will probably be released before the end of this month (though, again probably, forced to wear an electronic tag for a while, absurdly).
At present, Alison’s likely release date will be on, or about, 26 April 2021.
It seems that the date of Alison’s appeal (in the Crown Court) from the conviction and sentence of Westminster Magistrates’ Court will be 3-4 June 2021. God grant her victory!
[Alison Chabloz]
Recently, Steven Silverman of the abusive and malicious “Campaign Against Antisemitism” cabal and lobby group, wrote (in the Jewish press) that the “CAA” had put out “5 years of effort” into getting Alison Chabloz imprisoned, and now had finally succeeded.
In fact, Alison was briefly imprisoned last year, after yet another malicious attempt by the “CAA”, but was granted bail pending appeal; she then won that appeal (in effect: the CPS abandoned its opposition), and so only served 2 days in the end (plus the days of reception and release).
Silverman crowed about Alison’s imprisonment then and now, as did several of the (other) usual Jews and “antifa” idiots on Twitter.
Net result? After all that five years of effort —on Twitter, in the Jewish press, in suborning politicians and police officials, as well as the CPS—, the “CAA” has succeeded, this year, in having Alison Chabloz imprisoned for a total of what looks like being rather less than one month.
As against that, Alison Chabloz has received huge publicity and rather a lot of support, as a direct result of the prosecution and conviction. Don’t believe me? Look at the Readers’ Comments appended to the recent Daily Mail report about the case. Thousands supporting her.
Should anyone wish to send anything to Alison Chabloz:
Please note that any books should be *paperback, *new, and *sent direct from Amazon or other online seller. Please remember always to include the prisoner number (A6478EK).
She “done the books…so he could a tab on his ill-gotten gains“?! Newspapers such as the Daily Mirror may not be great literature but they used to be at least halfway literate. Nowadays, supposed journalists are often seen writing such as “she was stood at the back“! Not only the Mirror, incidentally. The Daily Mail is also terrible. Others too.
Neither is the above sentence, about someone called Tiffany, an isolated mistake. Look at the sub-headline in the same report.
On the wider question, how is it that the defendants got off so lightly? The thug boyfriend got 27 months, so he will be out in a year. As for the “ho”…yes, that’s right...suspended sentence. Who needs a Get Out Of Jail Free Card when you have a couple of young children as an argument in mitigation to put before the sentencing judge?
Finally, the court was told that the amount made by the couple was uncertain. Maybe so, but they owned a Range-Rover (albeit a decade old).
If the State, if society, is unwilling to really repress drug dealers and users, it will never solve the problem…
Alison Chabloz
Nothing new about Alison Chabloz’s proposed appeal and/or bail application. I shall add detail as I have it.
In the meantime, at least Alison has now already served (as of tomorrow,14 April 2021) 2 full weeks of what is effectively, or in real terms, a 7-8 week sentence.
Nick Griffin forgot to mention the £100,000 the Lawrence family was awarded by way of compensation.
@saffiyah_khan1 By ‘cases’ you of course mean positive tests , a means by which governments search for people who are not actually ill. https://t.co/kp18trbM4u
Was saying the same thing yesterday. Im pleased that the shops and pubs reopened but sometimes we need to keep our hands by our side and not join in with the celebratory landmarks of reopening of normal things especially under such restrictive rules. pic.twitter.com/fKPNS6QDkp
Peter Hitchens, beautifully depicting the world of his late father, Eric Hitchens, the Royal Navy, and the quieter virtues of the past.https://t.co/3gj9hHmAsi
The sheer scale of the royal palaces can be understood better from the air.
[Windsor Castle]
Straw in the wind?
I was at, inter alia, a filling station today. As I went into the kiosk to pay, a lady was just coming out. I noticed that she was unmasked, though had pulled up her loose woollen jumper in a ludicrous gesture to the Covid toytown police state regime; yet the mere fact that she had no facemask muzzle on made my heart leap. Freedom!
More seriously, few really have much (if any) fear of “the virus” now (for good reason) but are complying with the facemask nonsense purely out of conformism and convenience. The whole nonsense of the “panicdemic” is ebbing away, not before time.
Realist! You'd do anything, @vrealistliberal, to avoid even considering the possibility that a drug famed for its power to alter the human mind, strongly correlated with incurable mental illness, is in any way linked with the criminal violence perpetrated by so many of its users. https://t.co/lxYrgUhNdT
Translation of tweeter “@HerbyMcfly”s tweet: “I only accept what the msm news outlets tell me. I have no idea about the “Great Reset” or other proven (and even admitted) matters that are often lazily called “conspiracy theories”. I cannot even understand why a serial and constant liar, chancer, and opportunist like Boris Johnson would lie again for political advantage...”
Truly, “democracy” (and education) is wasted on some people.
I’m beginning to think that immigration and multiculturalism has destroyed this country. It’s had a negative effect on our way of life, culture and values and considerably increased the crime rate. Our history offends them, our whiteness offends them, but still they come!
No, she still appears to buy into the "your struggle is our struggle" narrative, and will probably continue to be used as a willing propogandist for Israeli interests. I don't think she said anything there that right wing Jews wouldn't say
I think she knows, but obviously can't call it out. Intentionally or otherwise, it's a got to be a red pill for some one?
— Two Hidden Assassins 63 (@BillDrysdale6) April 12, 2021
Tweeter “@BillDrysdale6” makes a good point. A similar example might be the fairly useless and certainly hypocritical utterances of Laurence Fox, the “Free Speech Union” etc. While they are (like Breitbart, Prison Planet Watson, UKIP, Brexit Party, Farage etc) “controlled opposition”, the utterances of those people and groups do start to awaken some people, if not “radicalize” them directly.
…”had enough”, perhaps, but “do anything much about it”, beyond posting on Twitter, I doubt it.
I have no quarrel with people trying to raise socio-political consciousness by tweeting, vlogging, blogging (as I myself do), but those activities alone will not trigger anything directly.
Foot Locker donated $200 million to BLM. Their Minneapolis store was just looted and destroyed.
I, who once lived in London (mostly Little Venice, but also several other areas from time to time), now have not even visited the capital for over 4 years, and have not followed the contest for the position of Mayor in detail.
I imagine that Khan, though useless and unpleasant, will probably win; the “Conservative” candidate, Shaun Bailey, has never done anything but be a kind of “Uncle Tom” for various parts of the Conservative Party etc, except to run a “charity” which accomplished nothing, and which suffered from financial “irregularities” (though Bailey was never actually charged with anything). Let’s just say that the monies “disappeared” somewhere…[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaun_Bailey_(AM)#Career_before_politics].
Bailey may or may not have been dishonest; he may have been simply incompetent and/or negligent. Just the person to run London! Oh, no…wait!
Bailey recently held a press conference, but the only person he could get to be filmed with him was a woman who could best be described as a “Balkan fraud”, and who was actually convicted of fraud and forgery a number of years ago (in 2013). ‘Nuff said…(for now).
British Fascists fought and died for Britain. British Fascists were put in camps with no charge or conviction for running a peace campaign. British Fascists always put Britain first. British Fascists are not and never were the enemy. https://t.co/oUH1u3dPOH
— Restore Britain – Scotland (@LeaderNBU) April 12, 2021
I have no further news of the persecuted satirical singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz, currently in prison after having been sentenced to 18 weeks’ imprisonment for contravention of the notoriously bad law, the Communications Act 2003, s.127.
The imprisonment was the result of years of plotting by the malicious Jew-Zionist cabal known as the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”].
The sentence of 18 weeks is in fact about 7-8 weeks after taking into account normal and particular discounts and reductions. Alison has so far done about 2 weeks actually in prison (as of Wednesday 14 April 2021), and will in any event be released sometime late next month. In the meantime, her trial Counsel is thought to be applying for bail on her behalf (pending appeal). The progress of that application and that of her appeal lodgment is at present unknown to me.
Should anyone wish to send Alison a card, letter, or book, the address is:
Please note that any books should be *paperback, *new, and *sent direct from Amazon or other online seller. Please remember always to include the prisoner number (A6478EK).
Tweets seen
Jewish officials in Marine Le Pen's National Rally party are writing a blacklist of party candidates with neo-Nazi ties: https://t.co/NjvQ2YlfjM
“Jewish officials” in the (renamed) Front National?! Non, non! Very disappointing (though not surprising).
Perhas, @annehoo77837961 Yet far less radical ways of making life quieter, such as better trains, more trams, more bicycling and walking, are not popular and have tiny political support. And millions love, play loudly (and make) hideous noise which they call 'music'. https://t.co/V9jBxkS6Ef
A 'Sunday Times' survey finds that more than 40% of those surveyed actually *enjoyed* house arrest, strangulation of the economy, travel bans etc. Yes, I know it;s an unreliable sample, but even so, I never knew bondage was so popular. https://t.co/uqHwbl9VTJ
I think that many did “enjoy” aspects of the initially-strict “lockdown”. Several reasons. Life was simpler overnight, in a world and a UK which seemed, and now again seems, often too noisy, complicated, stressed.
The iniquitous “British” so-called “long hours culture” (that in fact started to appear in the early 1980s) is part of that “society under stress”.
Then there is the fact that the now-ubiquitous “pleb”/”chavscum” element (both poor and not so poor) was stopped from driving around, crowding into places, beaches and country areas and, indeed, shopping areas. Same applies to the blacks and others in the larger urban concentrations.
Less road traffic meant that Nature could come back in a way many (including me) liked: birds, animals. Where I live is a semi-rural part of England anyway, but the effect was still noticeable.
Also, many people suddenly did not have to attend boring jobs in offices, factories, hospitals (yes, many NHS people too worked from home), pubs, restaurants. Many “worked from home”, which especially for those with comfortable detached houses, maybe with pleasant gardens, swimming pools etc, was a welcome change from the daily commuter grind.
Most of those unable to work from home were chucked furlough monies amounting to —again in many cases— 80% of their net pay, which taking into account commuting costs etc, meant that quite a few were better off than they had been when actually working!
Even those forced to rely on State benefits were better off, inasmuch as the post-2005 and then post-2010 bullying and harassment regime instituted by such as Alastair Darling (“Labour”), Iain Duncan Dunce Smith, and the Jew “lord” Freud was put on hold for the duration.
Of course, I was impelled to oppose “lockdown”, because of the enormous damage that it has caused to the UK’s society and economy, as well as to any notion of properly passed and applied law and civil rights (and because it had little effect on the spread, over time, of the dreaded virus), but there is no doubt that some aspects of it, on the ground, were welcome to many.
The challenge, of course, is to create a society with the positive aspects but without, as far as possible, the negative.
More tweets
Look how smart everyone looks. And the streets are so clean.
“Pointless” from the point of view of “keeping the public safe” but certainly not pointless from the point of view of the secret cabals hiding within and behind the State.
A “vaccine passport”, “track and trace” etc are very very useful tools in the armoury of State snoopers. The old Stasi, in the DDR (East Germany), would have fallen over itself to get hold of such tools and technology. Every citizen to be registered, tracked, identified in all locations visited, followed everywhere by electronic impulse (in the near future?). A microchip under the skin? Don’t say, “no, that would never be done” or “people would never stand for that!”… The mass psychological experiment of the past year or so has put paid to such complacent certainties.
More tweets
@lf_group France has many admirable features. But it is only under the Magna Carta/Bill of Rights tradition that freedom is the default position, rather than the conditional gift of the state. This is precisely the advantage that we have been busily trashing in the past year. https://t.co/JXdd9GI5lC
@lf_group France has many admirable features. But it is only under the Magna Carta/Bill of Rights tradition that freedom is the default position, rather than the conditional gift of the state. This is precisely the advantage that we have been busily trashing in the past year. https://t.co/JXdd9GI5lC
Hitchens may be right in some Oxford Union, theoretical, newspaper scribbler way, but is wrong in practical terms.
Workhouses, appalling prisons, low pay and no employment rights etc have all been features of British life in recent centuries, as has been detention for political purposes without trial (in both the First and Second World Wars). The Bill of Rights and Magna Carta did not much help those who were directly affected by the foregoing.
#BLM leader shows typical Communist leadership hypocrisy when it comes to spending donors' dollars and Soros' shekels on a new home…. https://t.co/SW6Z1AIJoq
And here are more arguments against marijuana legalisation. The claims of the legalisers have all been shown to be false in practice. Yet they do not give up, because their real argument was always a combination of greed for money, and selfish pleasure https://t.co/2PAaVinuLihttps://t.co/q4voI3Bk8r
Key claim of marijuana legalisers was that legalisation would put illegal gangs out of business. That (like everything else they say) turned out to be bilge, as I warned it would: 'Stoners cheered when Canada legalised cannabis. How did it go so wrong?' https://t.co/KwRZ5MvCyY
My own view of cannabis (and other illegal drugs) and the law is that, while the clarity of complete decriminalization appeals, I despise drug abusers, and would prefer either drug abuse to cease to exist, or drug abusers to cease to exist (or be eliminated).
On the other hand, the present system is not working.
I am also cognizant of the fact that societies where cannabis use is prevalent tend to fall to pieces, as Hafiz, the Persian poet, saw happening in his own country many centuries ago, and as one can see in the areas of the world where cannabis use is prevalent; Jamaica, for one.
All the —mainly British— people I knew when younger (1970s, 1980s), those who regularly smoked marijuana, dropped out of society to a greater or lesser extent.
Please understand that every time you hear the media or academics blaming white people for 'systemic racism', talking about 'white privilege' or 'racial injustice' caused by whites, they are building an antiwhite narrative that has deadly real-world consequences. pic.twitter.com/HVFO5walbt
That anti-white narrative or stream of constant msm propaganda particularly affects the blacks, who as a group tend to lack logical-critical thinking skills.
Fantastic article about the systematic abuse of English girls and the complicity of the f… government, the media and the police. White people, you are under attack! Wake up! Please, pass it on!https://t.co/3VjPSDakz0
Great News! Don't fall for the BS. The only thing the COVID passport issue will succeed at doing, is to wake up more people to the NWO plan, to turn the UK into a communist bio-security driven tyrannical police state. The great awakening is inevitable. https://t.co/a7aSHcRxje
Top Twitter tip: if you're "disappointed" by someone you follow giving their opinion on something, maybe this social media platform isn't for you. You can unfollow, mute or block that person, but don't tell them what they can and can't say. This isn't North Korea quite yet…
Radio loudmouth Julia Hartley-Brewer (who blocked me years ago on Twitter when I exposed her ignorance on a point or two of law and procedure) seems to be turning a blind eye to the abuses carried out by the Jew-Zionist lobby. She has never said a word in support of the free speech of those attacked, and even prosecuted, at the instigation of packs of Zionist Jews such as the “Campaign Against Antisemitism”. I wonder why?
Yes, Laurence Fox and his “Reclaim Party” can be put in the same bin as all the rest of the controlled opposition: Reform UK, Brexit Party, UKIP, “anti-immigration” “Conservatives”, Katie Hopkins, “Tommy Robinson”, Breitbart, “Prison Planet” Watson, “Sargon of Akkad”, Delingpole, Toby Young and his fake “Free Speech Union” etc etc.
Don't be complacent. This isn't going to end anytime soon. Remove them all from office & replace with our own people. Only then can we put OUR agenda in place. ⚔️ ⚖️
…meanwhile, in England, the people amuse themselves with football, rugby, tennis or cricket matches on TV, the latest meaningless msm gossip, the latest “celebrities” one has never heard of, and they worry about their booking of controlled, mask-wearing, machine-holidays of the upcoming summer.
And why, when all of the books show that modern nations are astronomically in debt to that banking consortium, do they seem to get away with continually increasing their 'borrowing' and deferring 'repayment'?
… the committee becomes a wake. The world is now being run by calculating miscreants who have understood this from the beginning. https://t.co/OkRKeZj4JM
When did you realize humanity is being slowly assimilated into an AI hive mind cloud consciousness by satanic occultists who worship lower astral beings that are trying to escape entropy by creating their own universe by synthetic means?
Seems that the hysterical hate-filled Left Waffen SS have now *cancelled* David Jason as well as the Queen. It's easy to laugh at them, but it's actually quite dangerous. Our post-modernist infatuated academic system is pumping out generations of kids who are mentally ill.
— Sozzinski (Person without a cervix) (@Sozzinski) April 10, 2021
Four Scotland opinon polls this week put pro-independence parties on 52% & pro-union parties on 48% in total constituency votes https://t.co/Q3Lw9V0PjD
Is that so? If the new Alba Party challenges the SNP in most Scottish constituencies, and effectively enough so that other parties come through the middle (Conservative, LibDem, Labour), then yes. It may well be, though (and I never claim great knowledge of Scottish politics) that many voters “up there” will choose between Alba Party and SNP, and simply dump the others.
Voters who are pro-Independence but anti-SNP. I do not know whether that is so, and whether there are even any pro-Independence but anti-SNP voters.
I am guessing, but it may be that Salmond’s quite recent sex crime trial has mortally wounded him politically, even if he was formally acquitted.
Either way, it does seem that “Independence”, however nebulous a concept that is in the Scottish context where a new Scotland might still be tied into EU, IMF, World Bank, NATO etc, is gaining ground with Scottish voters. That might have big geopolitical implications.
Well, I see that John Rentoul has again been defeated by me, this week scoring only 3/10. My own score was 6/10 (I did not know the answers to questions 4, 6, 9 and 10).
Scotland got the UK govt it wanted 1945-70, 1974-79, 1997-2010; for 43 of 70 years (61% of the time) 1945-2015, when Scotland voted SNP & could not by definition get UK govt it wanted https://t.co/YWydPnMK5p
In 2015, the SNP captured 56 out of the 59 Scottish seats in the Commons; in 2017, 35 out of 59, and in 2019, 48 out of 59. “Scotland” therefore, supposedly “voted SNP”.
In reality though, meaning in terms of the popular vote, the SNP only scored 50%, 36.9% and 45% in those years.
Four Scotland opinon polls this week put pro-independence parties on 52% & pro-union parties on 48% in total constituency votes https://t.co/Q3Lw9V0PjD
Usually, when there is a successful popular movement for a country to leave a larger country or empire, there is a large popular majority for that: 90% in favour, perhaps; certainly 80%. In Scotland, any majority at all is likely to be small, maybe 55% for and 45% against.
"Home"? For a moment my heart skipped a beat. But don't worry, #diversity is safe. Not even the deadly covid plague can stop our #enrichment. Even though you can forget that corona-killing week in sunny Spain, our incoming borders remain firmly open.https://t.co/TNwuGekglf
The shocking video of Hoffman’s and Damon Lenszner’s abusive behaviour is below. A judge convicted the pair of ‘disorderly behaviour likely to cause harassment’, described their conduct as ‘aggressive’ and ‘wholly unacceptable’, fined them and gave them restraining orders. pic.twitter.com/Zp38yFJDGm
A good point. In those tweets, Stephen Applebaum, of the malicious “Campaign Against Antisemitism” or “CAA”, supports the bombing carried out against British and other soldiers and civilians in what was then British-controlled Palestine (now “Israel”) in 1946. In that bombing, carried out by (other) Jew Zionist extremists, 91 people were killed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing.
Applebaum was also exposed, a few years ago, as having been a Twitter troll who, using, pseudonymous accounts, taunted people (mainly if not entirely women) online. He was exposed, in the end, during a preliminary hearing in one of the cases brought by the CAA against the persecuted singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz. He now tweets mainly from Twitter accounts “@grubstreetsteve” and “@Raven2384”, and is part of a small but quite vicious Jewish-Zionist cabal on Twitter and offline.
[Update, 9 April 2022: the said tweets, justifying the King David Hotel bombing in 1946, have now been deleted, presumably by the author of them].
Something about the First World War. Lieutenant Leefe Robinson, the first person awarded a VC for gallantry performed in or over the UK (in 1916), died in 1918, not from enemy action, but having contracted Spanish Flu: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leefe_Robinson
Other tweets seen
Marie’s back legs were left damaged by a traumatic birth that killed her mother and her sister.
‘She was hopping around as if she wanted to show everyone she has a strong character and wants to live,’ said Ronja Pohl, who first saw the disabled baby alpaca at a friend’s farm pic.twitter.com/NTjjIBaUda
Laurence Fox, the latest “free speech” (etc) advocate to studiously avoid offering a kind tweet or a single word of welcome or support to those persecuted by the Jew-Zionists: Alison Chabloz, David Irving, David Icke, me…(among others).
Now we see that he is actively hostile to the real interests of the British and other European peoples and to their future.
Laurence Fox now joins the other pseudo-libertarians and pseudo-national wastes of space —Prison Planet Watson, Sargon of Akkad, Breitbart, UKIP, Brexit Party, Reform UK, Katie Hopkins, “Tommy Robinson”, Toby Young, that Delingpole creature, the “Free Speech Union” etc— in the bin, where they all belong.
My mom is Irish from a long list of Irish ancestors. My dad is English from a long list of British ancestors. Why is my mom a native Irish woman but my dad not a native Brit?
Robert Jenrick again. Corrupt, rather stupid, married to a Jewish woman lawyer, and appointed a Cabinet minister. British politics 2021 in a nutshell…
Allowing our gardens and community spaces to be a bit wilder can really help wildlife. Simple actions such as letting wildflowers grow, leaving a scruffy corner, and ditching the poison will all boost biodiversity. More small-scale rewilding tips: https://t.co/d91h7GzRMb
Please note that Alison’s Prisoner Number, which should form part of the address when writing to her or sending any gifts such as books, is slightly different to that previously given by some people, and is A6478EK.
What is the point in having laws for animal protection when a cruel and nasty individual such as the defendant in the above report gets let off so lightly?
Note: The correct prisoner number for Alison Chabloz is in fact slightly different: A6478EK.
Does anyone fully understand new rules on 'Track and Trace' aka surveillance on pretext of health and safety? Appears to me that pubs, when they reopen, will be under *stricter* regulations than before, requring registration of every individual (not just one in each party).
This professional complainant has ensured that every MSM platform in UK knows her name, Chabloz could only dream of such publicity. Something tells me this isn’t about hurt feelings …otherwise why allow CAA’s ‘BedlamJones’ a free rein to stalk women online for so many years?
Well done, BBC— only a full week late! The sentence was pronounced on the second and last day of Alison’s trial, which was 31 March 2021. Last Wednesday…
What a bunch of clowns (and monkeys on a stick) the BBC is! Defund the BBC!
Who but an 'evil racist' would object to such manifest justice? So keep paying your taxes, because things like this in the US invariably spread. Or, just quit the System that discriminates against people like us. Rear your own children, not other people's! pic.twitter.com/jmlSTBQ6Y2
Seems that, at least in Marin County (California…Marin County is the area the other side of the Golden Gate Bridge from San Francisco), “universal” means “universal…unless you are white (no matter how poor you may be)”…
“Universal”, like “diversity”, seems sometimes to mean the opposite of the proper meaning…
Still more craziness from Blood Services (this time in Scotland) over masks. Donors must wear them but 'be aware that for monitoring purposes, they will need to be removed for health check and while donating'. https://t.co/Q25oq9m9N9 So why no exemptions?
Masks are of little use in preventing infection (and, no, the masks people are forced to wear now in shops are not the same as those used in operating theatres where, in any case, they are just a conventional habit from the past as much as anything).
Until halfway through last year, the UK government agreed with what I have just written, but then decided to force the cowed and compliant masses into wearing masks. There is, as with the whole “Coronavirus” thing, an agenda behind it all, and one that has nothing much to do with health.
Blood service is *unique* in the whole NHS in refusing to permit exemptions from mask wearing. Yet donors are by definition healthy, and are on NHS premises only to help the sick, not to be treated for illness. So why? https://t.co/7aFu4V6iQ9 via @theconwom
Interesting from the historical-cultural point of view. The red part of that map coincides roughly with the Roman Empire, though not exactly (North African provinces are in green, as is the Dalmatian side of the Adriatic, and other areas (notably Asia Minor).
Again, the green areas are those which experienced greater penetration of Islamic ideas and customs from the 8thC onward. Again, though, not exactly; only in very broad brush terms.
BBC News – Alison Chabloz jailed for being 'offensive'…
As one man's wine is another man's poison… Who gets to decide what's offensive? And why?https://t.co/MjcBtLNGpz
— 🌴mick👀fulcher🏴 esq (@mickbognor) April 7, 2021
The above tweeter reflects what was normal British opinion until a couple of decades or so ago. Free speech etc. However, even at that time, and for decades before that, a certain (((tribe))) was worming its way into influence and power in the UK. Freedom of expression has been one of many casualties.
@clarkpaula. The great majority having accepted that they should live their future lives by government permission, will now learn in slow, intricate detail what that acceptance means. So, alas, will the rest of us. https://t.co/Kp945h3qvr
Blair was one of the most fervent members of Labour Friends of Israel when he was an MP. Corbyn, though weak, was relatively anti-Zionist. Starmer is another Labour “Friend of Israel”, and is married to a Jewish woman who is a lawyer; their children are being brought up as Jewish; Starmer and his wife celebrate Jewish tribal holidays.
The Jewish lobby wanted to regain control of the Labour Party. They have. Corbyn is now an “unperson”, but Starmer seems to be doing worse, as Labour leader, even than Corbyn (a result which I predicted in these blog pages).
Philip Proudfoot should report Lewis to the SRA for harassment and breaching their code of conduct. The threat of doing this to solicitors/barristers usually makes them stop because they don't want their professional career to be negatively affected. More people need to do this.
Aaron Bastani and Jew-Zionist solicitor Mark Lewis are “discussing”, in the tweets above, the new Northern Independence Party, which is standing a candidate —a former Labour MP— at the Hartlepool by-election. As to Lewis himself, I have blogged quite extensively about him in the past: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/01/11/update-re-mark-lewis-lawyer-questions-are-raised/.
Morning music
More tweets
More evidence that the police are just making this up on the hoof. How do you define ‘gender’ Derbyshire? Is denying that gender should have anything to do with policing ‘hate’? https://t.co/4x5Z3yzxhE
I have seen and heard nothing as to whether Alison Chabloz’s trial Counsel (who, on her behalf, will be appealing her conviction and sentence), has as yet lodged that appeal and/or applied for bail pending that appeal. I apprehend that such application(s) will be lodged and made as soon as possible, possibly today.
[Update, 7 April 2021: It now appears that Alison Chabloz’s prisoner number is in fact slightly different from that quoted in the above tweet, and is A6478EK]
Johnson the alleged 'libertarian' flounders as he evades questions about 'vaccine passports'. Fraser Nelson writes: https://t.co/v3PrfwwaIQ via @spectator
I'm sick of our governments not protecting us from these savages. Open borders has always meant open season on white people. pic.twitter.com/heL34t1H1k
Heard half an hour of what used to be called the BBC’s “flagship news show on radio”. Do they have the cheek to still use that description? I hope not. Terrible. Dull in the extreme: Covid Covid Covid blah blah, Covid Covid Covid blah blah. Rubbish presented as news and “analysis”. Pathetic.
Rachel Reeves, the pro-Israel lobby MP (nominally “Labour”) was on, talking about David Cameron-Levita, Boris Johnson, and the breaking of the Ministerial Code. All very earnest, superficially, and I am sure that a few people in the Westminster Bubble were interested, but not 99% or more of the British people.
BBC Four
Now it seems that the BBC may be about to kill off or ruin one of the few decent parts of the BBC still left, television station BBC Four. Typical. The BBC must be defunded. It is more or less “Soviet TV” now, just a craven mouthpiece of the government in power. It has lost all legitimacy and credibility.
Tweets seen
Blood type is determined by the types of antigens on the blood cells. If mankind evolved from the same African ancestor their blood would be compatible, but it's not. Why does the body of an Rh(-) mother carrying an Rh(+) child reject her own offspring? 🤔 https://t.co/uCflEbRTX9pic.twitter.com/PVunLQQWS0
Interesting discussion. Britain should have a scientific institute akin to the one-time SS-Ahnenerbe [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahnenerbe]. Part of such an institute would be for research into history, archaeology, heredity etc, but another and equally important part would be devoted to research into ways to evolve humanity in general and European/”white” people in particular to higher levels; in other words, the creation of higher race-forms in every way. The “design” of a higher race, if you like.
Mother, 27, dies of cancer after check-ups were halted by pandemic. Congratulations to everyone whose credulity, cowardice and compliance allowed the climate change obsessed elite to impose their insane and destructive 'de-development' scheme on us all.https://t.co/CaZdNEeYKF
Believe it or not, the bastard being discussed is David Cameron-Levita! I thought that there could scarcely be a worse Prime Minister…until Theresa May and then Boris-Idiot came along. All three part-Jew, by the way… [addendum: I have now been told that the PM under discussion was in fact Blair. “Best PM ever“? I think not! A complete NWO/ZOG puppet, whose hastily-passed laws and policies still impede us today].
Government to step up efforts to identify people who are not ill.
It is striking how Waugh's work is becoming less-known these days @michaelvgcollin. Even the TV series of 'Brideshead'(close to the text) was too long for the modern world and superseded by a dire film that missed the point. Waugh wrote for people who love to read, now dying out. https://t.co/WkAA3RxKaa
Startling ignorance of course, though rather highlighting the Hitchens “Oxford” obsession (he lives there). Not everyone knows the sex of even famous people, if the names are unusual.
When I started Bar practice in London in the early 1990s, I was given one of my relatively few Crown Court cases (I always did more public, administrative and civil law, as compared to criminal).
The case involved the sale of counterfeit tapes, and was set down for trial, to be heard at Snaresbrook Crown Court. One of the artistes allegedly copied was Shabba Ranks. My first question to the clerk at Chambers was “who’s she?“. Not a good start (it’s a “he”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shabba_Ranks).
That was not my first Crown Court trial (the first having been a case of “s.18” GBH, aka “GBH with intent”, a serious charge carrying a maximum sentence of life imprisonment), but it was at any rate one of the first few.
I was always lucky in the Crown Court, partly because, as a mainly non-crime barrister, I never graduated to the really serious criminal cases such as murder, terrorism etc. The most serious cases rarely result in acquittal, because the evidence is usually very strong and often overwhelming.
Well, anyway…more by luck than judgment, I did manage to do OK in my counterfeit tapes trial, after (on the first morning), the Prosecution told me that they were discontinuing (on the ground of cost, the cost of proving via forensic science that the tapes concerned actually were not genuine). Thus my defence, based mainly on an arguably implausible alibi, was never tested.
Incidentally, I was also lucky in that “GBH with intent” trial, held in what was then the Middlesex Guildhall Crown Court (the building in Parliament Square now occupied by the Supreme Court of the UK). In that trial, the defendant, despite having stabbed the thuggish “victim”, and then having poured boiling oil over him, was acquitted on the ground of self-defence.
Hard to believe that tweeter “@TimothyNerozzi” is serious but, as Cecil King once said, no-one ever lost money by underestimating the good sense of the British people (it might have been “the intelligence of”…); https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_Harmsworth_King.
We have a rotten Government and an equally ridiculous official Opposition, but the idea that “the House of Windsor” could rule autocratically is beyond satire. Who exactly? The almost 100-year old Queen and Consort? Charles and Camilla? Surely not Andrew or Edward? The tame thick princelings, William and Harry? I suppose that at least Andrew and William could fly away, piloting their own helicopters, when it all went wrong…
1/2 @Andylaw1976 I often think Germany is the last conservative country in Europe. I suspect it is because they had a preview, in the DDR, of what is planned for the rest of us, and did not much like it. https://t.co/UlNobY2YCT
2/2 @andylaw1976 We think of the Wall and the Stasi when we think of the GDR. But few are aware of the political correctness, the children stuffed into nurseries while their mothers were marched off to wage-slavery, the comprehensive schools and the contempt for the church. https://t.co/UlNobY2YCT
“We think of the Wall and the Stasi when we think of the GDR. But few are aware of the political correctness, the children stuffed into nurseries while their mothers were marched off to wage-slavery, the comprehensive schools and the contempt for the church.”— Take away the Wall and the Stasi and the rest is pretty much the same as 2021 Britain. Maybe that is the point that Hitchens is trying to make, in fact…
It always makes me laugh when some uncultured, semi-educated “antifascist” idiot and/or Jew calls social-national people “knuckledraggers” or the like; low culture, education, or intelligence is at least as common, I would say far more so, on the so-called “antifascist” side.
Because both Government and Opposition are pro-“The Great Reset” and “the Great Replacement”, both are riddled with agents of the Jewish lobby, both are pro-ZOG [Zionist Occupation Government], pro-NWO [New World Order] and in favour of the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan, and therefore both following exactly the same agenda. Understand now??
Every day I try my best to report objectively but when the country is run by a bunch of slippery, self serving law breakers with absolutely no respect for the truth & no obvious comprehension of right & wrong it’s not always easy
BBC news now becoming a government mouthpiece for number of covid jabs given out. Ten minutes every night. Barely any coverage of protests and emphasis on pice injuries. Wonder if they are real this time unlike Bristol.#bbcnews
And this year hymns are still forbidden, most wear masks and proper Holy Communion is banned. Still far from satisfactory @alex_komnenos . https://t.co/oX6rcD1bsh
That, @guffynicola, depends on which icons are being clasted. Michael Wharton, writing as 'Peter Simple' in the Daily Telegraph of the early 1960s, was a hugely funny satirist of the emerging age of self-regarding liberalism. Colin Welch did a reasonable job of following him. https://t.co/s2yrUK3vZV
Not sure that I can agree with Hitchens. “Peter Simple”, whose stuff I occasionally saw in the early 1970s, always seemed to me to be a rather unfunny propagandist of a kind of faux-English suburban pseudo-reactionary mindset. Fake. At least, that was my occasional impression, a long time ago.
Gosh, @barbatosalv. Leaving aside the fact that the Christian 'explanation' of the origin of the universe is a parable, not a literal account, Einstein was not an atheist . Why not? Please read : https://t.co/XbQF3HtZYrhttps://t.co/a07Rb3u4qy
'We have made a religion out of politics, have ascribed to government power and state power things which ought to be ascribed elsewhere, and that we are now reaping the reward of that mistake.' https://t.co/2xNPVNmKys
There's now an effort to rewrite history on the Covid frenzy. The government does not want to admit that it once told the inconvenient truth (they're not much use) about masks: https://t.co/j2OyGYNOT7
There are plenty of examples of socio-political madness at present in the Western world, not least the near-worship of the blacks (as in the “BLM” nonsense), and in respect of “the virus”. The former is nonsense partly because much of our present world has been created over the past few thousand years, and especially the past 600 years, by white European people(s). The blacks were and are mere adjuncts, bystanders, spectators, sometimes nuisances and, yes (and as the “BLM” proponents themselves say) sometimes “victims”.
As to the latter of my two examples, i.e. “the virus”, in some respects that seems to be a deeper-embedded sort of madness, perhaps because based on a deeper emotion— fear.
The Coronavirus or Covid-19 virus has (supposedly) so far killed somewhere around 2 million people in the world. That is about one person in every 4,000 people. In the UK, the death toll per unit of population has been far higher (taking the statistics as given, though they are obviously faked or wrong to a great degree). In the UK, there have been well over 60,000 people who have died at least “with” Coronavirus. That is somewhere around one person in every 1,000 people in the UK.
Conclusion as to seriousness: serious but not existentially so.
Conclusion as to measures taken: absolutely mad. Society has been crippled, normal life largely put on hold, civil rights abrogated, and the UK economy facing a very serious hit. A cowed and frightened population have been walking around (even on solitary country walks etc!) in facemasks (despite such masks being of doubtful use), and every kind of busybody and self-appointed guardian of public behaviour given loose rein. That applies also to the police.
Meanwhile, millions of people are all but abandoned by the NHS because their ailments (including the most serious) are priotitized as secondary in importance to the supposed battle against “the virus”.
The public debate, such as there is, is futile, because a huge propaganda campaign has frightened the unthinking mass of the people into imagining that their lives are in danger from this virus, whereas for 999 out of 1,000 people that is simply not so. Reasoned arguments from such as Lord Sumption, the former Law Lord (Supreme Court justice), cut little ice, because emotion almost always trumps reason.
Oh, well. In the phrase of the day, which so well sums up the present apathy and complacency, which applies in almost everything now (apart from the “panicdemic”), “we are where we are”…
Alison Chabloz
On this Easter Sunday, let us not forget brave and persecuted satirist, singer and songwriter, Alison Chabloz, presently sitting in prison because a malicious Jew-Zionist cabal instigated a prosecution under the notoriously flawed Communications Act 2003, s.127.
It is to be hoped that Counsel for Alison Chabloz will soon be able to secure her release on bail pending appeal (to Crown Court) against an egregiously poor verdict and sentence by a magistrate. Unfortunately, that is unlikely to happen (if it does happen) before Tuesday [6 April 2021], at earliest.
Bored by 'University Challenge', I wrote my own quiz, with questions which are interesting even if you don't know the answers. Guaranteed free of African flags, Pacific island statelets, obscure mathematicians or quantum physics: https://t.co/mwMA4HCOs3
That last is interesting as a metaphor. The same view, pretty much, that John Buchan, or Zuleika Dobson, might have seen before the First World War, or that others might have seen between the wars. Oxford now is hugely different (not just in terms of buildings but socially too) from both 1911 and the 1930s world of Evelyn Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited, from that of C.S. Lewis, Tolkien and the Inklings, but that view remains essentially the same.
When I was a (rather belated) law student, in the 1980s, there was being discussed the question of whether barristers would continue to wear wigs and gowns. The wisest answer came from a lecturer who said that the Bar would cast aside everything except the wigs and gowns. The outward forms would remain.
In fact, while the above has proven to be mainly the case (in Crown Courts especially), in County Court the judge has discretion to dispense with the old form of dress, and in High Court and other fora (particularly in commercial cases) the old form of dress is often not in use now (neither is it in family law cases).
Nonetheless, most people do encounter the practising Bar in Crown Courts, and there the old forms remain in force. The substance of the Bar has, however, changed out of all recognition even since I was finally (having spent time in the USA) Called to the Bar in 1991.
Looking at the UK, the same is true in many other ways. Look at, for example, the Monarchy. It looks, at least largely, similar to what it was in, say 1956, the year of my birth. In reality, it has changed to something rather different. As I have blogged on previous occasions, whatever one may think of the Queen and Consort, no-one could mistake them or their lifestyle for that of “ordinary people”.
When you look at Charles, Anne, Andrew, Edward, there is less of the “royal”. You could just about (certainly in the case of the last three) imagine them living in some expensive part of suburbia, as part of (if the term now has any meaning) the rich “middle classes”, or indeed the “nouveaux riches”; or (as indeed is the case) living in Gloucestershire or Surrey, racing around in Range-Rovers, like characters in an “Aga saga”.
What about William and Kate, Harry and the Royal Mulatta? Notionally “royal” (in the case of William and Kate), but only in a “holding on by the fingertips” sense. Certainly there is nothing royal about Harry the “Royal Cuck” and Meghan the “Royal Mulatta” (who, not so many years ago, was actually married to someone else, a Jew businessman in Southern California!).
I do not want to be too hard on Harry. He obviously has emotional or mental problems, and was bagged by the Mulatta easier than the Duke of Edinburgh used to bag grouse, but he is basically now a peripheral nobody, albeit with plenty of money and still holding (so far) a couple of English titles.
William and Kate? At present still lined up to be King and Queen at some point, but I rather doubt that they will reach the finishing post.
Ian Robert Millard 