"Conspiracy Theories/Theorist" is a pejorative term riddled with prejudice for information the user of term knows nothing about and never will because they've prejudged it to be false.
The experiment in mass psychology and propaganda turns the screw tighter…
Israel has highest poverty rate in the developed world, OECD report shows – Haaretz | Israel news, COVID vaccine data, the Middle East and the Jewish World – https://t.co/M8lVDdaAvlhttps://t.co/XbrYIeac3A
What a surprise… no wonder most Jews in the UK do not want to F.O. and go there to live…
The MSM ( BBC in this case) is complaining about abuse. I responded to one it's employees; condemning the abuse, but also to offer a reason why there's a massive increase in anti-MSM sentiment. He did take time out to respond. An interesting discourse …https://t.co/RdIGn7ofJg
1. Hi Mike. No, abuse is neither justified nor acceptable. What is happening, however, is that the people are getting increasingly fed up with the MSM's cradle to grave Establishment propaganda, including the BBC's contribution to that since it was created in 1922. Huge numbers
3. promulgators to patronisingly call people "conspiracy theorists", a term which is as pejorative as it is immature.
So don't be surprised if you see an increasing level of complaints and criticism towards the MSM, which it rightly deserves. Unfortunately a small minority will
5. questioning that narrative are being increasingly smeared and persecuted, not just by the MSM shouting "Conspiracy Theorist!" at them, but by Social Media actively limiting their reach using shadow banning, ghost deleting algorithms, deplatforming, etc. We know the BBC has
2. incredulous claim that I'm encouraging abuse only serves to back up that perception. In a free society people should be able to freely protest, criticise and complain ( but NOT mount abuse ) about anything they feel is wrong. The MSM has for centuries been an Establishment
2. "Conspiracy Theorist!" which in turn and as designed, encourages soe ordinary people to use the same pejoratives against those challenging the Establishment's narrative. "grossly oversimplified" ? Well, as someone au fait with geopolitical history, I could write a whole
4. governments are the entities indulging in "awful anti-free speech behaviour". Behaviour which is getting deliberately worse as more and more are speaking out.
I'm just hoping for you and others within the MSM bubble could at least try and see things from the POV of those of
2. term "Conspiracy Theorist!" liberally, which is severely damaging her narrative. The MSM, Wikipedia, etc is pebble dashed with the term in fact. By all means challenge what you consider to be false hoods, or what you are told are falsehoods by Establishment sources, but
Very well said Methi. More people need to speak up. Itβs scary how bad are media has become. They will regret this when our freedoms are never returned because they helped support this medical tyranny.
A fairly interesting thread seen on Twitter. The BBC drone was typical of the type, all reasonable and even-handed on the surface but, when challenged, basically a supporter of System dictatorship. Conflates “free speech” and “regulation” thereof. “We need to regulate free speech so that we can have free speech” etc.
cf. “we have to impose a police state around the virus so that we can live freely with the virus“, and so on.
Incidentally, the aforesaid BBC drone is not even British. American: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Wendling. Time was when BBC people were all British, except for administrative staff overseas.
Here is a tweet from one of his colleagues:
I wrote for The Sunday Times News Review about my first year as the BBCβs Specialist disinformation reporter.
I have tried to meet and interview the people impacted by, falling for and spreading online conspiracies. Hereβs what itβs taught me! https://t.co/15qTrSaJJE
People like that, assuming for the sake of argument (and initial courtesy) that they are honest, should really look at the propaganda being spewed out 24/7 by the msm. Example? https://ianrobertmillard.org/2018/12/10/tv-ads-and-soaps-are-the-propaganda-preferred-by-the-system-in-the-uk/. They might even start to take a properly sceptical look at the “holocaust” farrago, with its thousands of proven fakeries and hoaxes (not least the “gas chambers” narrative).
In reality, such BBC and other “salarypeople” are closer in behaviour to propagandists than to traditional truth-seeking journalists. Look at this, from the same person, and published on the BBC’s own website: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-54738471.
Pretty similar to the sort of piece that was published in Soviet newspapers of, say, the early 1980s, or 1970s. Smug, hectoring, one-sided, biased.
Meanwhile, “in other news”
…it seems that it has come as a shock to many people that a crazed butch lesbian runs “a toxic workplace“…quelle surprise…
Ellen DeGeneres has faced a steep ratings decline, losing more than a million viewers since September, after reports of a toxic workplace at her show. It is a startling setback for one of daytime televisionβs most successful franchises. https://t.co/01cmSorOgU
At last! Caroline Jones in the Daily Mail points out the major health dangers of the absurd and pointless wrenching forward of clocks each Spring. pic.twitter.com/ee3WDcq9FJ
— π½πππππ π³πππππππππ πΉ (@scotbot) March 22, 2021
I've spent the last month producing a film about lockdowns. Why and how they were implemented, and whether we will see them again post-COVID, also featured in today's @TheSun.
…and the World Economic Forum, Financial Times etc have said, openly, publicly, that the “pandemic”/”panicdemic” is “a great opportunity“. They also specified “for what?”…the Great Reset.
They are preparing the ground for the next 33 years, to start next year in 2022.
Chief Constable of the joke police force that has been persecuting the satirical singer Alison Chabloz for years, egged on by a dimwit Labour Party Sikh who is the Police and Crime Commissioner for the county. Dim and also suborned. You could hardly have a more “peaceful protest” than singing songs! Even if (((they))) do not like them!
Derbyshire Police force was also one of the worst bullying forces during the initial panic of the “panicdemic”.
Look carefully and you can see the hatches through which the Polaris missiles would have been launched. The Ship's Company referred to themselves as 'The Greater Moscow Redevelopment Corporation', a joke I enjoyed even more when, a few years later, I lived in Moscow. https://t.co/NtsFqO9qDx
When I was first in Moscow, in 1993, I had a German map which was very easy to use because it had the landmarks and landmark buildings in 3-D picture form. Trouble was, the map had been printed in about 1988, and since then many of the streets had changed names. I knew that in outline, but not in detail. My enquiries of passers-by were therefore confusing to both parties.
Prospekt Kalinina had become Novi Arbat, the Lenin Hills were now (again, as before Lenin’s death) the Sparrow Hills, and so on. Various “landmarks”, such as statues and large busts of Soviet notables, were gone, sometimes without trace, sometimes having left behind evidence of recent removal, such as the bust of Kalinin on the former Prospekt Kalinina, ripped off its massive marble or polished granite plinth, the metal stalk that had secured it still sticking up from the stone.
When I returned to Moscow on a brief business trip in 2007, even more had changed. The huge, circular, and pleasantly dilapidated, swimming pool “Moskva”, near Metro station Kropotkinskaya, which in 1993 I had shared every morning with only a couple of small groups of elderly lady swimmers wearing plastic caps (the pool could supposedly accommodate 10,000 swimmers), had had a cathedral built upon it and, in other neighbourhoods, ugly new buildings were everywhere. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moskva_Pool
[Swimming pool “Moskva”, c.1980]
No @mklogue. My time in the USSR, later Russia, was by turns exhausting, educational, thrilling, dispiriting, exhilarating and hard on my family. I was never in any danger of romanticising it. But I am amazed at the (easily-cured) ignorance of it at high levels in the UK. https://t.co/bEvFenxXrN
As seen on almost every past blog post recently, Twitter censorship is now very evident; many embedded tweets just removed, leaving blank spaces. “The Great Reset”…
The persecuted satirical singer-songwriter, Alison Chabloz, faces trial under the notorious bad law of the Communications Act 2003, s.127 on 30-31 March 2021 (next Tuesday and Wednesday).
Alison Chabloz welcomes attendance by supporters (Westminster Mags, Marylebone Road, London; nearest Underground–Edgware Road; trial starts at 10.30, but anyone can enter at any time).
The number of Scottish MPs at Westminster varied, in those years, from 72 to (the present position) 59.
The SNP had no more than half a dozen MPs until 2015 (except for the mid/late 1970s, when it had 11). In 2015, the SNP won 56 out of 59 Commons seats (that fell to 35 in 2017, but rose again to 48 in 2019).
[2015 General Election: a map of the results, showing each constituency as a hexagon of equal size, with the black lines showing separations in regions]
[similar map for the 2017 General Election]
[similar map for the 2019 General Election; and note the erosion of Labour support in England]
The SNP is of course a System party itself: pro-Jewish lobby, pro-Israel, pro-immigration, pro-finance capitalism. Domestically, in policy terms, it is mostly somewhere around where Labour was in the mid 1970s.
For me, the interesting speculation is as to whether, should support for the “three main” System parties collapse in England, a new social national party might not do what the SNP did in Scotland. Despite the absence of any credible nationalist (let alone social-national) party in England, it might be possible, in an extreme situation. The considerable though brief success or near-success of the weak conservative nationalist parties, UKIP and Brexit Party, has shown what might still be possible.
Much of what has happened and is still happening in the UK (and the EU states, and Australia/New Zealand) in the past year or so has been a mass psychological experiment, on a huge scale. Social conditioning. Part of the “Great Reset”…
A perfect example of the crap British TV is. True Brits (that means White people!) are almost always shown as dimwitted, rude, coarse, racist (of course!) whereas coloured people are always polite, funny, clever, law-abiding characters. A bit one-sided, don't you think? https://t.co/b8natorjfi
Ironically, Peter Hitchens very good "A Brief History of Crime" from around the same time, is the best critique of this claim. Goes through a long analysis of police numbers to show we were at historic highs for officer numbers, especially considering the tasks they no longer do
Iβm sure the present combination of police overreach, harsh anti-civil liberties legislation and growing political intolerance will work out fine. https://t.co/7Rvszi0qF1
Good to see so many white (almost entirely white) real British people stand up and march for freedom and reason.
As for the liars at Sky News and other MSM outlets, they have proven themselves time and again to be the enemies of the people.
Tweets seen
I watched a live stream of the London protests while working today and it was honestly the best birthday present I could wish for. Well done to everybody who took part. You represented millions of decent, rational people.
Thank you for standing up for our future & our freedom.
We are not at the beginning of this, debating whether or not to lockdown. We've been doing it for a whole year. We have had stricter measures, for a longer period of time, than almost any other country on Earth. And still, you claim, 130,000 people died from the virus.
killed in the coming years. Then you will have two numbers to compare and this will help you to prove that lockdown was justified. Or maybe it won't (it won't). The completely psychotic reasoning of pointing out how many people died while we were doing the thing that was meant to
prevent them dying, as proof that we got it right, really worries me. I don't think it's healthy for this many people in a society to abandon their critical faculties to this extent. Aside from that, it just makes the debate so incredibly boring.
The implication is clear: “lockdowns” either do not “save lives” or are actually counterproductive. Lack of sunlight (and so, vitamin D) seems to result in higher “Coronavirus” infection rates. Being cooped up inside with others (at home or at offices etc) is worse than being (some of the time) outside.
Sweden has had no “lockdowns”, yet has done better than the countries, such as the UK, that have had such draconian restrictions. Those who say that Sweden is different because Sweden “has few people” and those “widely spread out” are merely showing their ignorance: most Swedes live in cities, towns, and suburbs, just like the British.
I had an interesting experience a few days ago. I attended a routine eye screening test appointment at a medical centre in a small town in the South Central part of England, near the coast. About 6 miles from my home.
I was about 20 minutes or so early, so sat in my car reading a book and observing. The car park was small, and I parked right by the main entrance of the medical centre. Early afternoon.
Apart from the main entrance, there were two large signs, one red, one green, with arrows pointing left and right, both directing persons with booked vaccination slots to go this or that way. I wondered whether the red was for people with “Covid-19” or other symptoms. Or it may be that the red was for people in a higher-priority tranche of the population. I saw two people enter by those entrances. Both looked entirely normal and well, on the face of it.
For my own appointment, the routine eye test, I entered the building. Deserted. Not even a receptionist. In fact there was one very old person sitting, masked, in an ancient parka, on a chair in the waiting area, where the chairs had been widely-spaced.
After a minute, a nurse or assistant in a dark blue uniform asked me to wait (and requested that I put my disposable facemask above my nose!) (I should add that, in the test itself, the girl doing the test said that it could only conveniently be done by having the mask below the nose). I was called bang on time. Very good.
The eye test itself was conducted in a friendly and professional manner and took but a few minutes. Before eventually leaving the building, I noticed that the waiting area was now deserted again; even the old fellow in the parka had shuffled off. I was interested to note, while sitting in the car for a while (to ensure that my eyesight had returned to normal after the test) that a few more vaccination people (about half a dozen in all, in about 30 mins) entered or exited the building via the side entrance-points. All looked entirely healthy, whichever entrance they used.
I had been to that medical centre once before, a few years ago. It was fairly busy then. Where, now, are all those other patients? Looks as though many many people who were being seen, in pre-“virus” times, are now not being seen, or only seen in small numbers. As Peter Hitchens or someone said last year, to some extent the National Health Service has become a National Covid Service.
As to the routine screening I myself attended, and though I doubt whether it was really necessary in my case, I was grateful that, under the NHS system, such precautionary measures are available for free. In the USA and some other countries (most, in fact), many miss out, and some then suffer and/or die because they develop conditions which, had they been detected at an earlier stage, might well have been treatable.
The NHS needs a real overhaul, but the principle is good.
More tweets
Just a few weeks of lockdown while we roll out the vaccine, they said. It's just one final push and it will all be over, they said.
It's now been ELEVEN WEEKS.
We still have THREE MONTHS more to go.
This week the Govt will extend lockdown powers to October.
How to demoralise public even further? Not only Gov ignoring data & sticking rigidly to dates, but public health types telling us dates won't count either. Freedom treated as theirs, dispensed drip by drip. Precautionary principle replacing principles of democracy & liberty. Grrr https://t.co/ID4dmkXMru
The Guardian, which has managed for decades to avoid paying corporation tax, despite sheltering a billion pound asset sale in the Caymans, claimed Β£100,000 in furlough funds.https://t.co/SOvZ5DcsFK
Where are all the masks being forced on our children in this happy little video? Just the one mask – with children behind happily mask-free. Isn't the Govt proud of telling schools to make children wear face masks all day? https://t.co/Y1w0WHcUWZ
Professor Neil Ferguson estimated that their were 33 people at the protest march today in London π pic.twitter.com/IZXYiTlx6m
— Sir Truth Seeker π΄σ §σ ’σ ·σ ¬σ ³σ Ώ ππ³π±π΅πΈ (@Truth_S_eeker) March 20, 2021
Sticks and stones…Professor Ferguson can be well satisfied: despite all his predictions having been proven wrong, wildly wrong at that, he is apparently still listened to at Downing Street, still welcome and treated with almost absurd respect on the BBC Today Programme and by that ghastly little bumboy on BBC PM; and he is still, very likely, banging his married “ho” in contravention of the stupid anti-virus “rules” he himself laid down. In fact, I should not be surprised, in our new “reward failure” UK, were Ferguson to be awarded some shopworn “honour” in the end.
Copper giving a good kicking to an anti-lockdown protestor whoβs already down on the floor
Wonβt outrage the media nor Twitter. No urgent review of policing will be called for by @SadiqKhan nor Labour
“What the hell” it is…is the sharp end of the emergent UK multikulti “Great Reset” police state. A UK where a remark —however true or accurate…that’s irrelevant— about a Jew or a black can get a British person hauled to court, a Britain where a Government-funded commission headed by an ex-Muslim repression-fanatic can report that statements not illegal (even under the present very repressive laws), and not even based on (however defined) “hate”, should be made illegal (!) if anti the doomed multikulti society.
Parliament is now a rubber stamp, as is the Monarchy, and the Opposition is exactly as ruled by the Jewish-Zionist-Israel lobby as is the Government. In reality, there is no true Opposition.
People were marching for their fundamental human rights and civil liberties, not against vaccines. And that doesn't make them "clots". I don't recall him abusing BLM or XR or the Everard protesters. When did the Left start abusing people for standing up for their civil liberties? https://t.co/shCwme37DJ
That’s the Dutch all over. In 1940, German forces invaded and occupied the Netherlands in 4 days (5, officially); Soviet forces would have taken 2 (had there been an invasion in the 1980s). In the 1990s, Dutch Army “soldiers” abandoned the civilians of Srebrenica to their fate after the Dutch were given the choice of fighting or leaving.
I used to really respect the Dutch and at least some of their liberality (in the 1970s), but even Dutch family friends began to understand, from the 1980s onward, that the liberality had led to licence. Also, to mass immigration, migration-invasion, crime, and general decadence.
Now look: liberality-licence-disorder-dictatorship, and a police force worse than that of Belarus or Russia. As often happens, Plato described the process first (in The Symposium). The cartoon below also fits.
At some point we have to tell these idiots to sod off. Social distancing is not human. The vulnerable have been vaccinated and the residual risk is now acceptable https://t.co/0CosOwT9X5
Most msm journalists, like (probably) most members of the public, still think that this is all about a virus (one that, worldwide, has only killed about 1 person in every 4,000, and in the UK about 1 person in every 1,000 —if that, bearing in mind the faked statistics—).
This is not about a virus. It is about “The Great Reset”, openly promoted by the World Economic Forum and in the pages of the Financial Times, Economist, and other System “insider” publications.
The virus situation has simply provided (as the WEF admitted in its tweets) a convenient opportunity. The virus has been weaponized, and the majority fooled.
In the all-important 33-year cycle, 2022 is the next really significant year. The year that will set the agenda for the subsequent 33 years, as 1989 set the agenda for the past 32-33 years.
George Galloway, though once a good effective orator, is ideologically unsound, inconsistent, self-seeking and, ultimately, just silly.
Civil society – the educated, the prominent, the influential, the professions, the media, the political class – must defend itself – or it will die. Between March and June 2020, it failed or refused to do so. It died. You won't revive it by walking down Oxford Street. https://t.co/jT3CtY4Hng
Hitchens is right insofar as marches and demonstrations achieve little or nothing, beyond boosting morale (if the numbers are impressive). As for the categories Hitchens mentions, he is correct about their surrender, but a future social-national state and, before that, movement, will not rely on those categories as they now are.
The media has one purpose and that is to lead your thought in one direction.
If it was a fair and unbiased platform you would be freely hearing two sides of the vax debates, allowing you to decide what is best for you instead of being forced fed one fear driven narrative.
The #GreatReset is just another one of the particularly greedy elite looting sprees seen throughout History: 1066. Enslaving serfs who ran away after the Black Death. Dissolution of the Monasteries. The theft of the Commons. The Clearances. It's what the super rich do. #scumpic.twitter.com/31LCaRyevX
Quite so @daveheller10 . And Professor Ferguson, acting as if he has been vindicated, is treated with deference by the BBC. This is what happens when civil society does not fight to save itself. The rule of drivel. https://t.co/g4DMeSw16l
1/2 A ridiculous misreading of the 1930s by @theeconomist. Channon was a marginal playboy. The upper-classes were mostly not 'pro-Hitler' and were prominent in fighting him personally when war came. The British Left opposed rearmament until the last minute… https://t.co/qwZ5G4VmCO
2/2 UK's then main left-wing newspaper, 'The Daily Herald' attacked rearmament as 'an affront to Germany' in March 1935 (2 yrs *after* Hitler came to power). Clement Attlee, *after* reoccupation of Rhineland in 1936, denounced 'a ruinous arms race leading to war'. https://t.co/qwZ5G4VmCO
Scribblers such as Hitchens would be far more credible were they able to write about how disastrous the Second World War was; and, above all, that it need not have happened….(Hitchens is part-Jew, though, so that may play a part in his reticence). See https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/05/19/peter-hitchens-and-his-views/.
…Elliott Cuciurean, for contempt of Court. Yesterday, the Court of Appeal halved his sentence. However, the fact this case exists at all is yet another threat to our freedom to protest. In 2020, he was found in contempt of Court for breaching #HS2βs anti-trespass injunction… pic.twitter.com/nK0RDIcgIM
…he was arrested, while #HS2 were allowed to continue with their felling & #ecocide. He was initially given a six months sentence, which was suspended for a year. Yesterday, the Court of Appeal halved his sentence to three months, suspended for a year, on the basis that …. pic.twitter.com/MfwBdeInx2
…the Judge had not taken full account of the fact that Elliott was engaged in βcivil disobedienceβ against #HS2. The Court of Appeal confirmed the important principle that people involved in civil disobedience must be shown greater clemency by the courts when being sentenced… pic.twitter.com/c7JCbhAwLI
Enjoyable, if slightly slow in places. Generally watchable. A team of Swedish and Danish counter-terror officers try to track a team of Islamist terrorists who are planning to use a stolen missile warhead mounted on a drone, and to attack a target not yet known to the authorities.
What made me laugh is how a huge amount of skill and ingenuity is used to try to catch the terrorists, but no-one ever questions the presence in Scandinavia of large populations of alien Muslims, without which situation, and regardless of the fact that (?) 90% or more are neither terrorists nor supporters of terrorism, the terror plot in the TV series would never have been possible…
Tweets seen
1/2 @matthew_lees. Many governments murder and/or torture their people(as well as other people's people). And we trade with them, subsidise them and invite them to stay with the Queen. Therefore our reason for intervening in Syria cannot be that. https://t.co/mJ41tRiH3W
The 'West' was displeased enough by Morsi's election to condone Sisi's seizure of power, and to accept without serious protest his large-scale massacres, so showing that their supposed objections to dictators, 'killing their own people' are in fact selective and not principled. https://t.co/uYtA2tKjTs
Nobody wants to see a repetition of US policies in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Libya, Yemen and Syria that have resulted in horrendous bloodshed and have given rise to the terrorist scourge and the refugee problem in Europe.
Let us take a country, unnamed. In that country, freedom of expression is gradually whittled down to almost nothing, especially on certain topics that are the mainstay of a certain ethno-religious minority within the unnamed country. Malicious prosecutions are bulldozed past lazy, dozy, incompetent, or suborned police, prosecutors and even courts.
In the unnamed country in question, the newspapers, radio stations, newspapers, magazines, are virtually all controlled or very strongly influenced by that same ethno-religious minority. In any case, a government organization has regulatory power over TV and radio and works to the agenda of that same minority.
In that country, the political system is likewise controlled, making the formation and operation of a “democratic” political party almost impossible, and certainly (combined with control of the msm) making political success in the ordinary peaceful way all but impossible.
Online, the same group (in fact, a small subset of the minority mentioned), in that same country, makes sure that dissidents are removed from major social media platforms. Any payment pages they have are also interfered with, and donations made difficult.
At the same time, malicious complaints are made about any dissident persons holding views inimical to the same minority mentioned above. Such complaints are made to social media platforms, to employers or business clients of the dissidents, and also to police, as already mentioned.
In such a situation of unfreedom, what is to be done, in what has become, in that unnamed country, an emergent police state, effectively controlled or influenced (to a degree amounting to near-control) by a small and clearly-defined minority?
I 'liked' tweets today that were offensive in nature about the use of the British flag as a backdrop in a government interview this morning. I have since removed these 'likes'. This do not represent the views of me or the BBC. I apologise for any offence taken. Naga
In fact, of course they represented her views and those of the “ZOG” BBC, which is now an organization wholly inimical to British and all other white European people.
To be fair, why should “Naga Munchetty” (real name Subha Nagalakshmi Munchetty-Chendriah) be favourable to the Union flag? After all, though born in London, she is not British by origin: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naga_Munchetty. She is, basically, alien.
The problem with Naga Munchetty is not her view of the Union flag (discourteous though that was) but the fact that she and others who are basically not British —and are fundamentally anti-White race and culture— are on the BBC and other TV and radio stations at all (certainly in the numbers they are).
Also, why are mediocre people such as Naga Munchetty and her English or Irish fellow sofa-sitter paid large amounts to sit looking stupid, and asking banal questions, on morning TV? A side point, but another irritating aspect all the same.
Still, her behaviour (not for the first time) is rather rude, and also rather churlish, bearing in mind the opportunities —and the luxury lifestyle— which this country has provided for her.
The Naga Munchetty storm in a Twitter teacup has brought all the political loonies and deadheads out! Here are a few:
All the people giving it "if you don't like the union jack, you don't have to live here" – where do they think people can just go? YOU TOOK THE AUTOMATIC RIGHT TO LIVE AND WORK IN 27 OTHER COUNTRIES AWAY
Oh, yes, the right to work in Slovakia, Portugal, Finland. I am sure that millions of Brits are gnashing their teeth that they can no longer do that! What world do these pro-EU idiots inhabit? Yes, true, I myself lived in France for years (though worked elsewhere, mostly in the UK), but the British masses never realistically had the opportunity to work in mainland EU. Only a few here and there (if you leave out the sad chancers trying to do B&B in Spain or France).
Here’s another:
To my mind the Union Jack has now started to look as sinister as the Nazi flag.#ToryDictatorship
— Julie Street πͺπΊππΊπ¦ (@Juliest101) March 18, 2021
Well, I do not think that the Hakenkreuz (Swastika) is “sinister” anyway, and neither is the Union flag.
“In 1920, Adolf Hitler decided that the Nazi Party needed its own insignia and flag. For Hitler, the new flag had to be βa symbol of our own struggleβ as well as βhighly effective as a poster.β On August 7, 1920, at the Salzburg Congress, this flag became the official emblem of the Nazi Party. In Mein Kampf, Hitler described the Nazis’ new flag: βIn red we see the social idea of the movement, in white the nationalistic idea, in the swastika the mission of the struggle for the victory of the Aryan man, and, by the same token, the victory of the idea of creative work, which as such always has been and always will be anti-Semitic.β [National Museum of American History;https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/search/object/nmah_1357427].
The above two tweets represent a current within the UK which is or was probably most concentrated in Corbyn-Labour. A cartoon view of both history and contemporary UK politics.
The anti-Union Jack people may be (?) in the majority on Twitter, but in the real world are a small minority. I myself am not a devotee, particularly, of conservative faux-nationalism, nor of monarchy for that matter, but it is irritating when aliens, and/or those with no alternative to speak of, attack either in a silly way. I’m English, you see…
Tweeter “@Helen121” is an example of a quite commonly seen phenomenon: the (almost certainly) white British person who sincerely, though wrongheadedly, believes that decent civic values, culture, law, order etc can survive migration invasion by (and subsequent breeding by) million upon million non-Brits; non-Europeans who have (even when born here) no real connection to our history, culture, beliefs, or values.
More tweets
I was struck by a final remark from Prof. Seedhouse in the very balanced HART review.
" …we desperately need to shift away from this monomaniacal obsession with one single respiratory virus and reclaim the vast array of choices that make up a worthwhile life"
I have obtained this photo of Izzy Lenga — a candidate for Labour's new National Women's Committee — decked out in an Israeli army uniform and flag and holding an M16 rifle. pic.twitter.com/W2xN51mqyE
If that were an Arab or other young person, who travelled from the UK to the Middle East to be trained in the use of weapons and explosives, not only would it be a tabloid newspaper story but, also, the “anti-terror” police and others would take an interest. Jewish? Israel? Oh, no problem…
The complacency of the police and others is incredible.
The MOSSAD defector, “Ostrovsky”, wrote in his book By Way of Deception (I read it in the USA when it was published in 1990) that MOSSAD and other elements of the Israeli state maintain arms caches in all foreign states where Jews live in any number, except the USA. I presume that ownership of weapons is so widespread in the USA that arms caches are unnecessary (or that the USA is thought to be completely under “their” control at Federal level). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Ostrovsky
This is as close to “preparation of acts of terror” as one could imagine without an actual proven operational plan: young Jews going to Israel and receiving such training (and/or “other” training?), arms caches prepared etc, yet nothing is done.
The Zionists are now embedded in the UK state and its institutions (police, MI5, MI6 etc), not to mention both Government (the Boris-idiot government being the most Zionist ever) and Opposition (Keir Starmer is just a Zionist monkey-on-a-stick).
Jewish-Zionist supremacism has to be dealt with in the UK once and for all.
Alison Chabloz
[Alison Chabloz]
Alison Chabloz, the persecuted singer-songwriter and satirist, has appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on a charge under the Public Order Act 1986.
When I first heard of the case, I realized that such a charge requires the approval of the Attorney-General. [“A-G”] It seems however, that PC Plod and the CPS do not know the law, because such approval was for some reason not sought before (should have been long before) the matter came to a court hearing.
I hear that, today in Court, retrospective or retroactiveapproval was sought! Really, the nonsense should have been dismissed, but it seems that a 6-week adjournment has been granted in order that the personal approval of the A-G, as required by law, can be obtained.
The present A-G is Suella Braverman, whose appointment has been very heavily criticized in the past couple of years. She is of expatriate Indian origin, and apparently a Buddhist. She is believed to have a Jewish husband.
“After meeting with her…the Board of Deputies of British Jews said in a…statement that she is “not in any way antisemitic”, saying it believed that she did not “intentionally use antisemitic language”, while finding that she “is clearly a good friend of the Jewish community” [Wikipedia] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suella_Braverman
We shall have to wait and see whether this rather “unusual” case against Alison Chabloz receives the required approval of the Attorney-General, or not.
One wonders about the state of the police and CPS these days when they bring a case to court that requires the approval of the Attorney-General, and when the CPS has neither received nor even sought any such approval! What a waste of public money and court time! Is it a “pay peanuts get monkeys” scenario? I don’t know.
This country is so screwed now that only a social national revolution can save it.
I have more information, but will blog anon about the case (if it actually proceeds, which must be doubtful).
[Update, 17 March 2022: The Attorney-General’s consent was not given, so the charges were reduced and changed to a level where consent was not necessary]
He also tweeted to Jewish-lobby puppet John Woodcock (the former MP, who is now “lord” something or other) that he should block me on Twitter! Woodcock complied, immediately!
Owen Jones never sued me for libel, if he thought that I libelled him (admittedly, I am now all but “unsueable” by reason of impecuniosity). I wonder whether, after seeing Jones’s performance over the past few years, more people agree with my assessment?
She actually had the gall to criticize her critics!
π΄ Not the most flattering angle on the pic doing the rounds, but can take the snoozing gags on the chin – I like a laugh as people know! But amidst the jokes, tripe like this is never far away – this time from an advisor to @andy4wm. Oh, to be a woman in politics… pic.twitter.com/KD2TPknJu6
The persecuted satirist and singer-songwriter, Alison Chabloz, will be in court tomorrow on first appearance in respect of a charge under Public Order Act 1986. From what little I have heard, it sounds like a nonsense charge, but I await developments. In the meantime, I wish her well.
Alison Chabloz also awaits trial, set down for 2 days (30-31 March 2021) on a charge under the notorious bad law of the Communications Act 2003, s.127.
Tomorrow’s hearing, and also that trial at the end of the month, will be at Westminster Magistrates’ Court, Marylebone Road, London.
Just a reflection: Have you considered how similar, if not identical was the art and architecture of Europe between let's say 1500-1900? That should make people realize that we are a great family that has been divided by religious fanatics and narrow-minded nationalists.
Just me and Enoch Powell on this show. Covering everything from police violence to Sarah Everard, LGBTQ+ and the war on the family to the Great Reset. Plus an exclusive reading from the latest book I've edited. Tune and thanks for all shares!https://t.co/pftoND5WRb
If you're not feeling uncomfortable about the merger of monopoly capitalism, big pharma and surveillance technology, you're not paying attention. And deserve everything you get! pic.twitter.com/Ntt2W19B5w
What is now happening is of course terrible, and is closely connected with the upcoming very significant year 2022, the latest since 1989 in the 33-year cycle.
By grace of God, there may be a way to turn all of it to the Good in the end.
Why does @ChtyCommission allow Zionist groups to βpoliceβ UK citizens using tactics synonymous with The Cheka police. How long before βvolunteersβ claim leather coats on expenses? Make no mistake #Chekism is alive and well just watch Joe Glasmanβs video. https://t.co/zZvuGe5HWg
1/3 @manmadeimage On the contrary, truth is often permanently suppressed. Who now remembers Burns and Morley, the members of Asquith's Cabinet who rightly opposed British entry into the 1914-18 war? https://t.co/ZJ9GLnaAf9
2/3 @manmadeimage. Who recalls Tizard and Bell, who opposed British bombing of German women and children as both futile and wrong? https://t.co/ZJ9GLnaAf9
3/3 @manmadeimage. These are 2 major issues where the truth was crushed by state power and mass opinion, and a ghastly error made- & to this day it can get you into trouble to support the losing side. There are many others. There is no temporal justice.Make of it what you will. https://t.co/ZJ9GLnaAf9
The suppression of truth is what the Jew-Zionist element has been trying to accomplish, for decades, in respect of the “holocaust” farrago, and in particular the “gas chambers” nonsense.
Todayβs Integrated Review looks βcake-istβ to me. Still pulling punches on China and lacking anything like the commitment of resources that the challenge requires. The West could be only a few years away from losing its military+technological advantage and we are still asleep.
There will probably be an all-out war with China (NATO v. China) sooner than we think. That war may well devastate the USA and Europe. It will be terrible, but also may give the post-Aryan European people the possibility of joining with Russia afterwards, in order to create a new society across Eurasia…and a future super-race.
I'm putting this on Twitter, after much reflection, so you can all see the kind of harassment that people like me get.
If he feels so strongly about such bad behaviour, Goodwin should have a word with the officials of the small but well-funded Jew-Zionist cabal known as the “Campaign Against Antisemitism” or “CAA”. They and their members have been trying to ruin people’s businesses, professional practices, academic careers etc for years, all the while playing the Jewish “victim”… The same applies to other basically Jewish groups such as “Hope not Hate” and its smaller copyists.
Protest against authority has now taken off. Like many others, I wish it had come sooner, had different roots in a rejection of tyranny. But we need to take what we can get. Left and right need to unite against despotism on 20 March.
Remember when only Third World dictators wore absurdly OTT uniforms covered in medals they'd 'won' without ever going to war? pic.twitter.com/uUk4j6VDYt
Scenes in Dresden as Germans who remember the police being on the wrong side before lose patience with their cowardly, thuggish bullying. "We woz only obeying orders" is no defence. Them's the Nuremberg Rules for tyrants and their bootboys. pic.twitter.com/aW07s6mr9E
Quite so @janinethechef1, but , having resisted it from the start, I feel I am well-placed to say that the flaccid, useless performance of the British educated classes came as no great surprise to me. https://t.co/dSH0V6vZIf
Peter Hitchens neglects to point out that it is hardly surprising that the (supposedly) “educated classes” in Britain have not, en bloc, resisted the weaponization of “the virus” into a social-control measure or excuse. Most of them have done OK during the past year of nonsense, “working from home” and getting paid (in effect) more, saving up to 4 hours a day on the commute etc.
The same people also failed to resist the 2010-2019 (in reality, 2007-2019) “austerity” nonsense and cruelties, because they themselves, and their families, were largely exempt.
As I have pointed out before, revolutions may be led or counselled, or later consolidated if successful, by disaffected aristocrats and middle-class intellectuals, but are usually made by the mob. Look at 1789 (French Revolution), 1848 (revolutions across Europe), 1871 (Paris Commune), 1905 (uprising in St. Petersburg), 1917 (first Russian Revolution, then Bolshevik uprising), 1953 (uprising in East Berlin), 1956 (Hungarian Uprising), and so on.
1/2 Lord Sumption was right to say that our freedom exists largely through convention. A lot of expensively-educated, prominent people well-rewarded by our free society simply failed to stand up for the liberties which permitted them to flourish. https://t.co/X3kLaDukHi
2/2 Now these same people moan because they have (just) discovered that the police have become an overbearing, excessively powerful militia. Of course they have. Parliament and most media backed the change a year ago. Power expands as freedom retreats. https://t.co/X3kLaDukHi
So far as I can see, no other media have followed this story. The near-universal voluntary silence on the OPCW makes suppression unnecessary. Once Iβm dead , * nobody* will do this sort of thing. pic.twitter.com/dAG1pgIz0u
Recognize the source of the lies. As always, mainly the Jew-Zionist element, now embedded in UK politics, civil service, msm, and law.
Another lost battle, as test positives are now universally described ( inaccurately) as βcasesβ :βThird wave of Covid in autumn is inevitable, says ONS chief Sir Ian Diamondβ https://t.co/a3phO1Jgpk
Death notice in window of what was in my childhood the majestic Elliston and Cavell department store in Oxford, an unalterable fixture in the heart of the town . I believe the Cavell was distantly related to the brave Nurse Edith Cavell. pic.twitter.com/2egYNH8SBZ
Prejudging any inquiry, Johnson submits to the Ferguson orthodoxy like a defendant confessing to sabotage at a Stalinist show trial. You cannot βacceptβ as fact something which has not been established. pic.twitter.com/9QAfjyAU8Y
There are quite a few odd people such as “@drdankeown” on Twitter, people who seem to think that we live in the world of Robin Hood, Cromwell, or King Arthur, a world in which the Monarch exercises real power, rather than simply being a constitutional figurehead with real privilege, something rather different.
Acting as Devil’s Advocate, I suppose that if, in some fantasy scenario, the Queen were to suddenly put herself forward as a kind of crowned dictator, and were to demand that police, Army etc follow her political and immediate direction, the vast majority might comply, in our 2021 UK where the notionally “elected” politicians are almost all fools, incompetents, knaves and/or traitors.
The fact, though, is that the Queen will not put herself up as such a tyrant, and her apparent successors, Charles and William, could never command such support, either among those who have sworn an oath, or the public generally.
Just heard a few minutes of a BBC Radio 4 The World at One interview with Alicia Kearns [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alicia_Kearns], Conservative Party MP for Rutland and Melton. Frighteningly thick. These people purport to rule the UK…
My latest conversation with @Iromg on @talkradio – Clapham, the police, become a militia, lost sheep welcomed back to the fold, plus poison gas and Admiral Lord West
Easy to say @henryviii , but how precisely do you win against such overwhelming forces? History is full of good causes that were defeated. Sometimes you must fight simply because it is right to do so, not because you expect to win. https://t.co/JngVC1jSf4
The most anti-white ppl are *white* ppl – whites with lefty-genes. Includes most MPs & MSM. We are bombarded with white hate all day long from the MSM. Sometimes ppl in other races, and who are individuals who do not hate us, when they observe this, simply cannot understand it.
— @Keep_Bexhill_ Weird (Heyoka), Kyrie Eleison (@Larus_Argentus) March 13, 2021
#Davina is right. Sarah's killer should hang, but the anti-male, sex-war hysteria being whipped up is as artificial & dangerous as the anti-white obsession promoted over George Floyd. If you want to make our streets safer for women, stop immigration.https://t.co/Yhctep5DhJ
It occurs to me that, as with “the virus”, this recent crime is being used to continue “lockdown” by other means. A curfew for men after 1800 hrs is absurd, yet apparently being considered by the Scottish and Welsh pseudo-governments. England? Who knows?
A “curfew for men”, if it were actually to be enforced, would in reality be a curfew for everyone, because relatively few women walk around alone after dark anyway.
All part of “the Great Reset”? I wonder…
In your opinion @stephenbottrill . Christ is indeed unwelcome in every generation, to those to whom He is unwelcome. That's a large part of the point of the Gospels. https://t.co/zDczKBzqoL
Christ overturned the tables of the Jew moneychangers. That is one part of the New Testament which is very relevant to the present-day.
'What I object to strongly is the idea that there is something wrong, secular or frivolous about loving the beauty of the 1662 Prayer Book's language. Beauty is truth, and goodness is both beautiful and truthful.' https://t.co/jz101BABaH
Not sure that I agree with that: the Good, the Beautiful, and the True, are all distinct, though they may at times co-incide, or coalesce. The “Trinity of existence”?
'If we truly believe in eternal life, then we should not submit so easily to secular decrees. If we believe in the love of God, we might do well not to fall in so easily with policies based largely upon fear.' From my intervew with the 'English Churchman' https://t.co/jz101Bj0j9
Will we ever get a cool rational anlysis of the global panic which has impoverished the free nations of the world, and led them to abandon much of the liberty on which they used to pride themselves? Increasingly , I fear not. This was as bad as 1914. https://t.co/1fWmb36ySk
Every day at home is driving people up the wall, and strangling whatβs left of a very dodgy economy. I wonder how @dpjhodges is feeling now about his optimism that Johnson would lead us to liberation. pic.twitter.com/sUA33fpRMX
Absolutely true. Buildings can always be saved if thereβs a will. (But too often developers bamboozle planners & planning committees.) Hereβs an example. Ally-y-Bella in Wales. Derelict & restored by small building trust the @SpitalfieldsT following compulsory purchase. https://t.co/s3qW4z9zo0pic.twitter.com/XXbcVFUVVx
John Rentoul gave himself 5.5 out of 10 this week, thus (for once) beating me. I scored only 5 out of 10, not knowing the answers to questions 3, 6, 8, 9 and 10.
This is what happens when Jews, particularly Zionists, have power over non-Jews. It may take different forms in different host-countries but the essence is similar. The extent or degree depends on the demographic percentages, mainly.
Late afternoon music
Late music
14 March 2021
Some music
England…
A few stray thoughts about the USA(etc)
Those who read my blog regularly will know that I have never been favourable to Trump, and for a number of reasons, despite the fact that I tweeted “in his favour” during the 2016 campaign (because Hillary Clinton and her clique wanted conflict in the Middle East against Syria and Russia, which could have ignited open Russia-USA warfare).
Well, time moves on. A Jewish cabal had my Twitter account removed in 2018; since then I have not tweeted (it’s a largely pointless activity anyway). Trump, after having been elected, proved himself nothing more than a loudly-squawking parrot in a gilded cage, and guarded by Zionist Jews. His removal at the 2020 election was, overall, formally legitimate (in my opinion), even if attended by some anti-Trump illegalities. Was it, however, truly legitimate in the wider sense? I say not.
For me, this whole question goes beyond ludicrous Trump himself. It cuts to whether the American system and way of life is actually working for either those of white European origin who mainly built the country into what it is, or indeed for the blacks and others who are —with exceptions, yes— at the bottom of the socio-economic pyramid.
The socio-economic system in the USA is an exaggerated example of that now existing in the rest of the Western world.
In the late 1980s, I think around 1987, I saw an ad in a British magazine which summed up what was happening under the Thatcher government (and in the USA under Reagan). A picture of an Old Master painting juxtaposed with a photograph of the then quite new Canary Wharf development. Under the Old Master, the legend, “work of art“, but under Canary Wharf, “the art of work“.
In the past 30+ years, that influence has become mainstream in both the UK and also the even more receptive USA. How often do we now see and hear about any group of people that they deserve more pay, profit, privileges because they are “hardworking”? All the time. School students “deserve”, we are told, to be awarded top grades (meaningless as many now are) because, yes, those teenagers are (said to be) “hardworking” even when it is patent from the pronouncements and tweets etc of many that they know very little about anything.
Likewise, groups ranging from NHS employees to schoolteachers are judged not on whether they are being organized, deployed and activated efficiently or with good results and outcomes, but on the premise that they are “hardworking”.
The other side of the coin? Those who for whatever reason are (supposedly) not “hardworking”, meaning the unemployed, disabled, artists and others not financially successful, and so on.
It is rarely examined how many of those at or near the top of the society “deserve” their privilege. One example? The UK Royal Family. The kefuffle around Harry and the Royal Mulatta has brought that into focus, with the usual protestations of how “hardworking” they all are! I suppose that some mugs believe it…
The aim of all the propaganda is, of course, to keep the working masses under control. The “virus” situation (a weaponization of a real, serious, but not existential problem) has made such control easier.
[with a few small changes, the first line could also read “(old-style) SOCIALISM”…]
Reverting to the American situation, we see that there has been an election which simply changes the deck chairs on the boat deck. Trump is out, Biden (with his even more plainly Jewish government appointees) is in.
The mass of the American people are simply not served by either major political party now. I want to focus on those of white European heritage, those who might create a better society, i.e. those who have the inherent ability to do that.
America is now majority non-white. The election of the mixed-race Obama (always called “black”, of course) was the sign that the democratic one-man one-vote system was no longer going to be any use for the white people of America on the Federal level.
Yes, Biden is a white person, but he is just a figurehead, and a puppet. Almost all of his top appointees are Jews, and the few who are not are “black” or, rather, mixed (eg Kamala Harris).
Demographics are the key. As America grows ever-more non-white, the political power will move that way too, towards the non-whites (but always under Jew-Zionist ultimate control), and towards the major cities and population hubs.
If the white people of America and (because this is not solely a race/ethnicity question) those who favour a so-called “traditional” way of life, become an ever-smaller minority, elections become less and less relevant to them. On the Federal level already, soon on the State level in some parts of the USA.
At some point, those who favour a civilized form of life and government are going to have to pull away from the USA as it now is becoming. Not just in terms of the ethnicity of the President, but also in terms of the whole finance-capitalist system that no longer serves the people (white, mixed, black, or other).
I do not foresee an immediate civil or social war, one with many casualties. This is a slow burn. Certainly the weapons which so many Americans worship are of no immediate utility. Not when the Federal authorities have tanks, jet aircraft, armoured cars, SWAT squads, the FBI etc. Still, the night is young…
[Update, 15 March 2021: I am told that in fact tweeter Horus is still on Twitter].
Covid-19
From 6 months ago:
Tweet seen
Thanks to my blog commentator, “Claudius”, in Argentina, for alerting me to this:
This image is a symbol of everything beautiful about the Aryan race. An elegantly dressed young woman in a beautifully landscaped garden showing affection towards an animal. Elegance-Beauty-Compassion. https://t.co/uyigoknSxI
Exactly! No wonder so many people of colour have nothing but contempt for us. And they are right! I don't hate people of colour, I just love my own. My hatred is reserved for those brainwashed self-hating white traitors! https://t.co/EebXH0GJyI
The news that a piece of “digital art”, or electronic art, has been sold at auction for USD $69 million was puzzling. Apparently, such art can be copied for free, without any cost at all.
In other words, the $69,000,000 art can be replicated and used effectively without cost. This is not quite the same, or goes beyond, having a paper or other copy of, say, the Mona Lisa. Any copy of the Mona Lisa is probably subtly different from the real one, whereas (according to BBC Today Programme) the copy of the piece of “digital art” will be exactly the same as the original.
It seems that what is auctioned is not the digital art alone but the art plus an electronic key to the original, which allows the owner of that original to access the blockchain for it, blockchain being defined as follows:
“Blockchain is most simply defined as a decentralized, distributed ledger technology that records the provenance of a digital asset“; or
“In the simplest terms, Blockchain can be described as a data structure that holds transactional records and while ensuring security, transparency, and decentralization. You can also think of it as a chain or records stored in the forms of blocks which are controlled by no single authority” [and see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain].
In other words, what the purchaser has bought for his $69 million US dollars is the right to change the electronic artwork, just as the owner of the Mona Lisa or other material art has the legal right to add a moustache to the subject, or to take up an axe and chop it to pieces.
In fact, thinking about it, presumably the artwork, if copied by a third party for free, can also be changed for free (though not the accepted “original”). That means that the $69 million US dollars is buying only the notional ownership and nothing else.
The auction of of the $69 million artwork challenges our concept of value. To me, buying “digital art” for more than pennies is completely stupid, but I concede, if it is a concession, that paying out 69 million dollars for any artwork is absurd, even if that artwork were the (original) Mona Lisa or, say (a favourite of mine), Man in Armour by Rembrandt (believed by some to be a representation of Christian Rosenkreutz, said to have been modelled by Titus, son of Rembrandt).
Bitcoin can be sold back, i.e. cashed in, though its real world use is limited. “Digital art” can be sold on as well, if the owner of the art, i.e. holder of the blockchain key, can find a purchaser (in my opinion, mug) willing to take it on.
In my first blog post about Bitcoin, I examined money. Why do we value tokens of monetary value such as banknotes? It all comes down to confidence.
In the end, does Bitcoin have less “legitimacy” or “value” than paper banknotes, or electronic entries on the ledgers of known banks? Maybe not, but that is perhaps less a validation of Bitcoin than a criticism of what we call “money value”.
Has capitalism reached, with the auction of digital art (and, arguende, with the sale of “real” art for sometimes hundreds of millions), a stage of decadent absurdity which may be a predictor of worldwide economic and social collapse? For me, the crazed heights at auction (of both types of art) are a sign of poor judgment as much as anything.
It does make me wonder what kind of person would rather have a piece of digital art than USD $69 million! Does that make me a Philistine, or just not a mug?
Is there a case for artworks of designated importance, of more than a certain age (100 years plus?), and valued at more than a designated level, being held and owned only by specified museums and galleries around the world? It’s a idea (of my own), anyway, though of course that would not stop speculation in artworks of younger age (and we have seen works by many quite recent artists, including Francis Bacon, Lucian Freud, even Damien Hirst, go for huge amounts). Neither, of course, would such regulation stop speculation in digital art, not for decades to come, anyway.
For me, this latest art speculation is a societal warning flag.
Tweets seen
Surely I'm not the only one removing such outrageous affronts to human dignity, freedom and common sense? pic.twitter.com/g11AfVT64A
The odd logic of tweeter “@MenziesBj” reminds me of the similar thinking of not a few instructing solicitors when I was at the practising Bar. There is a phrase in use among barristers, “solicitors go elsewhere“, reflective of the fact that instructing solicitors often stop instructing particular Counsel for no obvious reason.
You would imagine that, if as a barrister you do well in a case, then the solicitor who instructed you would instruct you again, and if you did not do well, would not instruct you again. In fact, while that sometimes does happen, often the reverse is true. No-one knows why.
Barristers are, especially when not in the very top sets, very dependent on their own relationship with solicitors. I was once slightly acquainted with one barrister, in a friend’s chambers, who had a very good practice despite (my impression) being not particularly intelligent. 90% of his work (25 years ago) came from one solicitor (not even one firm, but one individual solicitor in one firm).
One fine day, as Kafka put it in The Trial, that solicitor stopped instructing him; according to that barrister, for no obvious reason. Result? A serious problem for the barrister, obviously. 90% of work gone means about 90% of income gone.
That (nameless) barrister was one of those men who combine a relentlessly politically-correct attitude with a certain amount of sex-pestery, as my friend in his then chambers had mentioned to me. Many years later, one of his pupils, a young woman, made an official complaint about him. I do not know all the details, but he was fined Β£4,000, and may have been lucky not to have been dealt with more severely.
A personal nexus between a solicitor and a barrister, though inherently precarious, can work in favour of a barrister. I knew another barrister, though not well, who was a member of another friend’s chambers. The former had a friend from university who had become a salaried lawyer in a large organization. That employed lawyer directed work to the barrister. In one year, such work totalled, in fees, some Β£600,000! That was nearly 30 years ago!
Not quite as good as winning the lottery (or being born into a fortune), but almost.
More tweets
I am quite certain of this. Indeed the British Foreign Office has shockingly resorted to this smear, as I shall soon reveal in detail @julian_grbichhttps://t.co/odw1ZE0e01
It is very distressing @kynohy. And reminds me of βHenryβs Demonsβ . The side-effects of the antipsychotics used to treat marijuana users who become ill are pretty grim. This is not just an episode that comes and goes. Lives are wrecked for good. https://t.co/tcOo8KpXPV
Did you know that just a few minutes of being active in nature is a proven mood booster? No matter where you are, urban, rural or anywhere in between, the beauty of the natural world exists amongst all of us and the best thing is, it doesn't cost a thing. https://t.co/MNYZU5Xkoc
Trying their best to hide more of our history,sir Henry Cooper heavyweight boxing trained above this pub now a Chinese restaurant,just as well I knew it was here and enough solid locals to ensure it remains Thomas A Beckett old kent rd se1 pic.twitter.com/53mtMEdMYL
I remember seeing that pub in the 1980s, when travelling down the Old Kent Road in Southwark. So now it is apparently a restaurant?Vietnamese, not Chinese, according to the Internet. Sign of the times.
It may be a Muslim “Scottish” Pakistani who is fronting the new Scottish free speech repression, but I would be prepared to bet that those really behind it are (((something else))).
“Heather Burns, policy manager for the digital rights organisation Open Rights Group, said: ‘It’s needles in haystacks, and this is collecting the entire haystack.
‘We should have the right to not have every single click of what we do online hoovered up into a surveillance net on the assumption that there might be criminal activity taking place.’
Privacy International’s advocacy director, Edin Omanovic, echoed a similar sentiment and said: ‘Make no mistake, as warned, the Investigatory Powers Act (2016) gives authorities across the UK some of the most far-reaching and draconian surveillance powers found anywhere in the world.
‘When the Bill was proposed, we were promised the most transparent surveillance regime in the world. Yet, here we have a secret experiment where two secret internet companies have reportedly been collecting internet browsing data about individuals’ online activities.” [Daily Mail]
“Male curfew”
I missed this latest piece of crazed nonsense, which was being reported upon yesterday, it seems.
“A Green Party peer has suggested a 6pm curfew should be introduced for men in the wake of Sarah Everard’s disappearance.
Baroness Jones of Moulescoomb told the House of Lords that such a move would “make women a lot safer, and discrimination of all kinds would be lessened”.” [Sky News]
So she was an office bod for a number of years, became a mature student and then studied carbonized plant remains for a decade…oh, and she was a member of the pathetic London Assembly for 4 years, and failed to become an MP twice (in different London constituencies, coming 4th in both elections, getting 6.5% of the vote in one, then 2.9% in the other). She also tried to become Mayor of London, but only received about 4% of the overall vote.
Not a stellar political record, but hey!…this is the UK, where serial failure is rewarded so long as the idiot is “anti-racist” and/or (stand up, Boris-idiot!) pro-Israel. So she was elevated to the House of Lords!
Sometimes, I think that this country is terminally screwed.
Her previous utterances? Let’s see…”She was outspoken about numerous issues including what she called mayor Boris Johnson‘s demonisation of youth through the use of “baseless” rhetoric on “soaring gang-membership and rising knife-crime”, suggesting the mayor created an unhelpful climate of fear.[28] ” [Wikipedia].
As for her curfew idea…look at her!
Jesus H. Christ! If I saw that walking towards me after dark, I would go home at once, lock and bolt my door, and impose a curfew on myself!
A nice-seeming young woman having her dreams crushed by the usual Jew-Zionist “claque” and clique, aided and abetted by their “antifa” idiot-serfs.
If you're white they call you a "racist" sooner or later, no one can escape their fate. In an antiwhite system that's how enemies of the regime are designated. It's time to bring down antiwhitism! There is no other way around it!
So sorry you are sanctioned just for being true to yourself Freedom of speech is no longer respected in the UK Hold your head up high You have done nothing wrong π
— π¬π§Alicia π¦πΊπΊπΈ (@12Walkies) March 12, 2021
Your views and concerns are perfectly valid, rational and shared by millions. We not a tiny minority they make out. Don't give up you have lots of support.
Amy be really strong and stand up for yourself do not let these people bully you or try to take your place away if they do join another dance academy ππ
— EibhlΓn NΓ ChrualoaΓ (@EileenCeltQueen) March 12, 2021
I had a similar letter and phone call from the British association of counsellors and psychotherapists about my social media activity I told them where to effing go!!
— EibhlΓn NΓ ChrualoaΓ (@EileenCeltQueen) March 12, 2021
British social-national revolution! We know in our hearts what has to happen.
Ian Robert Millard 