Tag Archives: resistance

Diary Blog, 23 February 2026

Morning music

[Prokofiev, Piano Concerto no.1, played by Evgeny Kissin, with Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra under Claudio Abbado]

Basic Income, Artificial Intelligence, robotics, and social upheaval

I saw that a blog post published in 2018, 7-8 years ago, still stands up well, in my opinion:

Morning cartoon

Tweets seen

See also:

Good God. Talk about “the new Bu“! J. Edgar Hoover must be spinning in his grave.

Lindsey Graham is a truly disgusting person and puppet of the Jewish lobby/Israel lobby, even by the standards of most American politicians.

Too late, surely?

Is Dan Hodges being disingenuous or just fatally naive? Has he never heard of the Jewish lobby, the Israel lobby, the “New World Order” plan(s), or “Zionist Occupation Government”?

Starmer is not the organ-grinder, but merely one of the monkeys…

I have tried various games or tests like that in the past.

Today, I tried same test:

Not far different from tweeter Sophie Meaden, but rather more socialist and even less authoritarian.

There, you see: I am not really “an extremist” (as Jew-Zionist fanatics, “antifa” loonies etc, even the Clown Prosecution Service, have often said) after all…

[“National Socialists are terrifying.

Imagine a whole group of people who:

  • Protect and love animals, nature and children
  • Prioritise the health, safety and welfare of their people and nation
  • Aim to abolish everything harmful to their people and nation (violent crime, drugs, prostitution etc)
  • Appreciate and cultivate beauty, art and skill
  • View one another as family, as part of a spiritually collective soul

Definitely wouldn’t want to associate with anyone like that.

It’s a wonder how any of us sleep at night knowing there is evil like this living among us.

In all seriousness, the only people who have any reason to fear national socialists are those who pose a threat to our people, nation, animals, nature etc.

So if you fear us, you should take a look in the mirror and realise that YOU are the problem. Not us.”]

Brava!

That kind of noisy “grifter” achieves nothing much beyond an increase in his own bulging bank balance. I am only interested in concrete results.

(not that I disagree with all that he says, of course).

Investigations are OK, and sometimes necessary, but in the final analysis, again, I want concrete results. Read that how you will.

Josh Simons“. Jew, or half-Jew. The Jewish/Zionist/Israel influence runs like a toxic streak through the whole “get rid of Corbyn”/Labour Friends of Israel/Labour Against Antisemitism/Starmer/Mandelson/Labour Together/Maxwell/Epstein thing. Absolutely toxic influence, both in the UK and, under other guises, in the USA and elsewhere.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Simons

Josh Simons was born on 24 July 1993.[2][3] His father was Jewish and from BuryGreater ManchesterSimons has cited “persistent failure” to tackle antisemitism for his resignation from Corbyn’s office.[5][6] He later contributed to the Equality and Human Rights Commission‘s investigation into Labour antisemitism

In 2022 Simons became the director of the think tank Labour Together[11] which he led until his Parliamentary selection in 2024.[12]

Simons is also a member of the UK parliament Israel All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG), which supports Israel and advocates a bilateral relationship between the UK and Israel.

In February 2026 it was reported that PR firm APCO Worldwide had investigated the private affairs of several journalists when commissioned by Labour Together, whilst Simons was director, to ascertain the source of reports about Labour Together’s late declaration of certain donations.[13]

The Sunday Times reported that the APCO report was written by a former Sunday Times employee and was shown to Labour shadow cabinet members, falsely suggesting that two Sunday Times journalists were part of a Russian campaign to politically harm Starmer. Labour Together sent a shorter version of the APCO report to GCHQ‘s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), which declined to investigate.”

[Wikipedia]

A conspiratorial cabal.

Note the repeated attempts that have been made to blame Putin and Russian Intelligence for the defaults of Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell etc, when it was quite obviously an Israeli operation from the start. MOSSAD, Aman etc.

Dan Hodges and other scribblers have eagerly recycled the “it was Putin and Russia and the SVR” smoke, but it really never washed. Utter bilge.

I wonder whether that dishonest Steele person, who was in SIS before he turned to making money privately, was involved in the anti-Russia smear (again; not for the first time, of course).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Steele

More tweets seen

The betting market is strongly focussed on the Greens to take Gorton and Denton at the by-election. Maybe so, but I remain convinced that Reform and Goodwin can still do this.

Many 2024 Labour voters (50.8% vote-share) in the constituency will either not vote at all, or will migrate to Reform or the Greens.

Many of the Muslims, who comprise about a third of all Gorton/Denton voters, will migrate to Green; at any rate, the Muslim vote may be split between Green and Labour (in proportions that are and will be unknown, even after Thursday).

How many white English/British voters will go for Reform is also up in the air, as is any quantification of the chance of Reform being able to recruit people eligible to vote but who did not vote in 2024 (turnout was only 46.8%, pathetic for a general election). In 2024, Labour was returned with 50.8% of votes cast, but only about 23%-24% of all eligible votes.

My guess is that few real British/English voters are going to vote Labour in this by-election, and they are about 65% of all eligible voters. The Muslims will either go Labour or Green, probably more the latter.

My conclusion remains what it has been since the beginning: very close, but Reform can do this, if luck is with them.

Incidentally, at this by-election, a third of the voters are the Muslims, and they are all or almost all, Pakistanis. Should non-Europeans even be allowed to vote? Frankly, I think not.

[“Police vehicles were used to traffic her and some of the abuse events were called ‘cop nights.’

“torture included waterboarding and strangulation by rope.”

“raped by a dog, filmed, and forced to rewatch the footage as the men placed bets.”

“she witnessed the murder of at least three girls, one of whom was allegedly killed as a punishment for speaking to the police force.”

You aren’t angry enough.“]

That is my conclusion about British people generally over the past decades— “not angry enough“. Too many are still far more interested in whether a “British” sport team (mostly composed of blacks and browns, usually) can beat some other such team, somewhere or other in the world, in some meaningless competition, than in the steep slide of the UK into multikulti dystopia.

Talking point

Is she wrong? Look at the Israel lobby in the UK.

Dr. Aladwan is fighting to save her medical career, heretofore unblemished, from extinction at the hands of the malicious Jewish/Israel lobby. Her crowdfunder: https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/help-me-fight-the-israel-lobby/.

More tweets seen

I doubt that I have ever agreed with scribbler Yasmin Alibhai-Brown before. Wonders will never cease.

Every. Single. Time.

Perhaps he will flee to Israel in the end.

Late tweets

Presumably, that woman then retreated indoors to her bottle of booze, her hashish pipe, and her viewing of something such as Loose Women.

Not necessarily. After all, Reform is still an upstart party, despite having had opinion poll leads for well over a year. I think that, if Labour cannot retain Gorton and Denton, it proves that they are toast. However, if Labour were to hold on by a few points, that would still indicate that they are toast in all but long-traditional, kneejerk Labour tribal areas.

If Reform comes in second to the Greens, especially,then that would be a smallish setback, bearing in mind the Muslim/Islamist factor. If Reform comes in third, then that would be a far bigger setback, though scarcely fatal.

It is true that Reform is not breaking past the 35% point in the opinion polls, and usually is not breaking past the 30% mark. That is because (as Goodwin has said) Farage has welcomed too many tarnished Con Party defectors, several not even white European. Were Reform social-national, and free of fake “libertarian” rubbish, it would be at 50% in the polling.

Ha ha. Yes, I am sure that she feels terribly afraid, that BBC talking head “earning” hundreds of thousands of pounds a year, and who only has to say a word to have the police (and the several Jew-Zionist snoop and strongarm squads) come running to her assistance.

More propaganda.

The hypocrisy would be stunning, were it not so typical, and so often seen.

“They” seem to be afraid…

Hey! Had they been offering that when I was there 1989-1993 (on and off), I would certainly have signed up for a few days, or a week or two, while I was reading for the New York Bar (I was Admitted and sworn in in early 1993, if memory serves) and had little money most weeks.

The Muslim/Islamist element is only one of several major demographic blocs in the UK that pose a challenge to a decent future for the British people.

Late music

Diary Blog, 10 September 2025, including more thoughts about clueless Starmer, and about the Jew Mandelson and his links with Epstein, the Maxwells, and Israeli Intelligence

Morning music

[Cloisters, Gloucester Cathedral]

Tweets seen

“They” are very brave when targeting children or other unarmed civilians, but they still have the race-memory of a time, about 80-90 years ago, when they themselves (at least, their ancestors) scurried in fear away from soldiers wearing a different uniform…

A horrible, evil little sprite.

One day, the Tel Aviv area may see similar scenes. “What goes around comes around“.

Translates to about 392 Reform MPs, so a substantial overall majority. Lab 99, LibDems 64, SNP 33, Cons 30 (etc).

I have seen a few tweets noting that, in another recent opinion poll, Reform’s share dipped to about 28% after its recent annual conference, but those tweets are mistaken insofar as they say that the lower Reform UK level therefore shows increased support for Labour or Con. I think not. People are not intending to vote Reform to get a Farage/Reform government; they are intending to vote Reform in order to stamp on and kick Lab and Con.

Look at 2024. Voters voted Labour (or abstained) in order to kick out the Cons and their “great non-white hope”, the little Indian money-juggler, Sunak. Labour thus gained an unmerited large Commons majority even though, out of every 20 eligible voters, a plurality, 8 out of the 20, did not even vote; 4 out of every 20 voted Labour; 3 out of every 20 voted Con; 2-3 out of 20 voted Reform; another 2-3 voted LibDem, and 1 out of 20 voted Green.

The point is that, having binned the fake Conservatives, the voters now want to bin fake Labour. The result of that will be that Reform benefits by default, as Labour did in 2024. The wish of the people, though, is not Reform government, as such. They accept, whether consciously or not, that that will be the inevitable result of binning both main System parties, but their wish is just to have an effective government, and a society which puts Britain and British people first.

It is hard to say what the “ceiling” of Reform, in percentage terms, may be. The opinion polls have had Reform as high as 35%, so far. That may stretch to 40% or higher; we do not know. I certainly think it doubtful that either Con or Lab will get to 35% before the next general election. Lab may or may not get to 30% (I doubt it); the Cons are unlikely to go higher than 25%, or even 20%.

As often said, my hope is that Reform beats Con and Lab, but then fails in government, leaving the field wide open for the advance of a social-national movement that, at present, does not exist in a formal sense.

…and the police must stop acting as puppets or good little dogs for the Jew-Zionist/Israel lobby (especially the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism” or “CAA”).

No “financial support” or facilitation should be going to Israel anyway.

Well, if so, then also ban the main Jew-Zionist troublemaking orgs— “CAA”, “CST”, “UKLFI” (etc). After all, “equality is equity“…

Well, we know that Mandelson is uninterested in young (or any) women, so what is the connection? It must be the Jewish and Israeli connection. Mandelson is a Jew. Epstein was a Jew (Epstein now, of course, having “gone up the chimney”, but Mandelson not yet).

Mandelson is yet another member of Labour Friends of Israel, along with Starmer-stein and almost all of his Cabinet.

There is a clear Jewish, Zionist or pro-Zionist, and Israeli Intelligence (MOSSAD, Aman etc) aspect to the whole Epstein case. Look at the involvement of the half-Jew, Ghislaine “Maxwell”, whose horrible full-Jew father, “Robert Maxwell”, is believed to have been MOSSAD’s chief agent in Europe, until (very probably) assassinated on MOSSAD or Aman orders. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Intelligence_Directorate_(Israel).

Look at my very detailed, and frequently updated, examination of all such matters around Epstein:

Hodges thinks Starmer-stein’s position is hard to understand. Not when you factor-in Starmer’s slavish pro-Israel position, which is egregious even compared to that of Sunak, Truss, “Boris”-idiot, May, and Cameron-Levita.

Look at Starmer’s Cabinet, at his elevations to the Lords etc. Starmer may actually be a conscious and willing agent, or at least an “agent of influence”, of the Israeli state.

Mandelson. Just another lying and manipulating Jew-Zionist, who has wormed his way into the world of Westminster politics over the past 30-40 years.

Like previous no-good prime ministers, Starmer was the preferred candidate of the Israel lobby. That lobby trashed poor old Corbyn, and (via a Labour Friends of Israel, and pro-Zionist msm, conspiracy) installed Starmer and his Labour Friends of Israel ministers.

Speaking for myself (and as can be verified by my blog posts going back several years), I always saw Starmer as “dull as ditchwater“; also, having been at the Bar myself, I knew that quite mediocre people often get quite high positions in English law, in Starmer’s case as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). I therefore thought, until about 3-4 years ago, that Starmer, though dull and also in the pocket of the Israel lobby, would —as a Prime Minister of this country— be at least administratively competent. I was therefore surprised, circa 2022, to see that, in fact, Starmer was so incompetent that I described him that year as “utterly clueless“.

I think, though should not say so, that I was right…

Look at stupid Starmer-stein’s face as the scarcely rhetorical question is asked. He looks more affronted than the Jew from Israel.

In a single day…(and it is happening every single day).

I am not “anti-Polish”, not by any means, and travelled there several times in the late 1980s, but I struggle to understand why the current Polish authorities seem determined to have their country flattened again, and for no good reason.

I suppose that is what happens when parliaments are full of corrupt self-seekers, and do not reflect the will of the people.

Salus populi suprema lex esto: the welfare of the people is the highest law [Cicero].

Late music

[painting by Victor Ostrovsky]

Update, 14 September 2025

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/13/jeffrey-epstein-emails-wealth

“Jeffrey Epstein was a very wealthy man, but exactly how wealthy and where that money came from remains shrouded in mystery.

Newly unearthed emails last week shone light on Epstein’s role as freelance client development officer, acting as a channel between political figures and business titans, greasing up the former with lifestyles they could not afford and the latter with avenues of political influence.

the questions about the source of Epstein’s wealth have never been fully resolved. He was worth nearly $600m at his death, thanks mostly to two wealthy billionaire clients – Victoria’s Secret founder Les Wexner and, later, Apollo Global Management co-founder Leon Black – as well as Johnson & Johnson heiress Elizabeth “Libet” Johnson, sister of former US ambassador to the UK Woody Johnson.

Between his collection of lavish homes in New York, Palm Beach and Paris, two private Caribbean islands, two jets and helicopter, Epstein held nearly $380m in cash and investments, according to his estate.

That wealth arrived suddenly. According to associates, until the end of the 90s, Epstein was living in a two-bedroom apartment on Manhattan’s Upper East Side close to the river. It was only when Maxwell arrived from London that his lifestyle was dramatically elevated.

Epstein moved to a townhouse on 68th Street and later to a 28,000-sq-ft mansion on 71st Street, later transferred to him by Wexner in 2011.

Steven Hoffenberg, a former business partner of Epstein convicted of running a Ponzi scheme, claimed that Maxwell’s father, disgraced press baron Robert Maxwell, introduced his daughter to Epstein in the late 1980s.

[Guardian]