Tag Archives: Eliot Ness

Diary Blog, 14 February 2026

Afternoon music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beatrice_Rana]
[painting by Vicente Romero Redondo]

Saturday quiz

Well, this week 5/10, same as political journalist John Rentoul. I knew the answers to questions 4, 5, 6, 9, and 10. In the back of my mind, I think I might have scored on question 1, too, but did not.

Cuba: interesting report

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/feb/13/no-water-or-electricity-and-children-begging-in-streets-filled-with-rubbish-but-this-is-why-i-wont-leave-cuba

I have written about Cuba previously (use search box if interested), but this report by a (formerly?) pro-Cuba and maybe pro-Castro Scotsman who has lived there for years is well worth reading.

Of course, it is almost trite to say that Cuba is on the point of collapse, because that has been said for the past 35 years, but it now seems inevitable, either from implosion or via American intervention.

Tweets seen

Our animal friends.

[“Everyone was lied to about Hitler. Our education system pushing it all for many decades has done so with Jewish history books and lies about the war. Nationalism Socialism isn’t “far right”. It’s the third position which is very centrist in a political sense. Yes, Hitler went a bit full throttle towards the end, but his initial ideology of the NSDAP is what we need to fix Britain and Europe.“]

Free poppadoms for all!“…

Meanwhile, Starmer-stein is again, as he fondly imagines, on the world stage. He wants British and EU taxpayers to stump up even more money for “defence” (anti-Russia build-up) and “Ukraine” (the sliding Jew-Zionist regime in Kiev).

Meanwhile the migration-invasion of the UK continues unabated…

Jews talking about killing all Palestinian Arabs in Gaza (etc) and then settling the cleared areas with Jew settlers or colonizers. A fully-Jewish “final solution”…

Genocide and then settlement by Jews, in plain language. Jew lawyers in the UK, USA etc may argue, in their Talmudic way, about whether Jews have or have not engaged in “genocide” in Gaza, but just look at the place now! Does it matter what label Jews or others place on what has been done?

Actually, from the Israeli point of view, the “crime” of the Palestinian Arab operatives on 7 October 2023 was not the killing of hundreds of Jewish revellers and military personnel (many of which were actually killed by Israeli forces, implementing free-fire protocols, anyway), but to have successfully invaded “Israeli” territory. That pierced the Israeli feeling of invulnerability.

I admit that I myself was taken by surprise; I would previously have doubted that the Arabs could pull off an operation like that (and keep the plans secret).

In fact, I think that Netanyahu and his cabal may have known of the 2023 attack on Israel in advance, and let it go ahead (in the manner of Roosevelt and Pearl Harbor), because it provided a good excuse to ethnically cleanse Gaza (just as Pearl Harbor provided the excuse to get the USA into war with Germany, via its Japanese ally).

[“Help for the peaceful inhabitants of Dimitrov” (Dimitrov was the older name of Mirnograd)]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myrnohrad

I heavily criticized that “End of History” nonsense in my unpublished book The End of the Millennium and the New Age of Alexander (written in the United States in 1990-1991). Nice to have been proven right (again).

Starmer-stein— a complete puppet of NWO/ZOG.

More music

More tweets seen

Ha ha! “…once war reparations are received from Russia“…That will be never, then. “Reparations” are paid by the losing side in a war. Russia is quite obviously winning (though slowly) the war against the Kiev regime. The EU “leaders” are living in a world of wilful delusion.

The British and EU taxpayers are going to be losing out. Money desperately needed here is going to be sent “over there”…

Note also:

All connected…

I am waiting.

Dimona. Ben-Gurion Airport. Central Tel Aviv, and nearby wealthy areas.

Russians, too, do not want more Jews. It is a conundrum; a problem, in fact…

Those tweets refer to the Jew Epstein.

See also:

More music

[Robert Stack as Eliot Ness in The Untouchables; Ness was not FBI, though: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliot_Ness]

Late tweets seen

Late music

[https://ekaterinalitvintseva.com/en/biography]
[Roman Bozhkov, Bridge . Reminds me of the wooden, narrow, and very dilapidated bridge —but without any handrail!— which I used in early 1982 to get from the shore of a lake on the border of West and East Germany to a tiny island, where there was a birdwatchers’ hut (no glass in the window, and a leaky roof), and in which I had to sleep one night]

Diary Blog, 20 September 2024

Morning music

[Robert Stack as Eliot Ness in The Untouchables; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Untouchables_(1959_TV_series)]

Tweets seen

A completely corrupt political system.

“Fill your (gold) boots”…

Starmer is despised and hated. Not all political leaders, though, are afraid to meet and walk among the people…

More music

“Mark Lewis Lawyer”—latest news

Regular readers will be aware that James Wilson, a university lecturer, won a libel case against two Jews, Cantor and Mendelsohn. A third defendant, a vicious Jewish online troll called Pete Newbon, killed himself during the trial, having concealed his activities from his wife.

At conclusion of the trial, the judge criticized, and found not credible, the evidence of a number of Jewish “witnesses” called for the defendants. Among those witnesses, Adam Cailler (Daily Star scribbler), Joanne Bell (prolific on Twitter sub nom “@jobellerina”), one Nathan Comiskey, and Simon Myerson, a notorious and vituperative Jewish barrister and, at the time, Recorder (p/t judge) who since the trial (though not because of it), has been removed from the Bench by reason of his unpleasant social media arguments and remarks.

Mark Lewis, the egregious and now mainly Israel-based solicitor, acted for at least one, and I think at least two) of the defendants. The lost trial and the aftermath of that trial, brought out that Lewis had, not for the first time, misled the Court, and also had misled (whether deliberately or negligently) his own client(s), in telling them that, were he/they to lose at trial, his/their family home(s) would not be at risk in relation to the damages and costs of the proceedings (costs incurred by the victorious claimant, Wilson).

The Court, at and after conclusion of trial, made it clear that those homes were at risk, not protected. Lewis’s negligent or (arguende) deliberately dishonest behaviour and advice has thus put at risk the homes of the losing defendants.

I missed what has been happening in the past few days:

Not sure whether Wilson is “tongue in cheek” there. Mark Lewis “one of the UK’s leading media litigators“? He must be joking. Lewis is just a self-promoting fraud, his dishonesty covered up (and his abilities hugely puffed) in past years by a Jewish-Zionist newspaper and TV cabal.

When Lewis was found guilty in the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal in 2018, his own Counsel asked the panel to limit any fine on the ground that Lewis was impecunious, his only assets being his own clothes, a private pension worth £70 a week, and a mobility scooter! Lewis was said not to own his own home, and even the car he drove was being paid for by the DWP scheme “Motability”.

My own blog posts about Lewis, going back to 2018: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2019/01/11/update-re-mark-lewis-lawyer-questions-are-raised/ (that post has links to the other posts).

See also, my most recent post, which contains much about those Wilson v. Mendelsohn and Cantor and Newbon (deceased) legal proceedings: https://ianrobertmillard.org/2024/07/26/diary-blog-26-july-2024-including-the-latest-news-about-the-unprofessional-behaviour-of-mark-lewis-lawyer/.

The losing defendants, who were plainly misled by a cabal of their fellow-Jews, face losing their family homes. Wilson seems far more concerned about them than I would be in his place. Those Jews were after all (all of them, not just the hapless losing defendants) willing and eager to see Wilson and his family lose everything, including their home, so I say F*** them!

Even if the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority does not, once again, put Lewis on professional “trial”, I imagine that his losing client or clients will very likely sue him in professional negligence to recover the monies (at least the costs monies) lost (apparently) by reason of Lewis’s poor advice. We shall see.

Those photos of Lewis must have been taken at least a decade ago. He is now scarcely able to get in and out of his wheelchair without assistance, as was seen recently after his latest scam (assisted by his now wife, Mandy Blumenthal) crashed and burned at the Edinburgh Fringe:

see

I think that I can claim to have been the first, or one of the first, to have seen through the Mark Lewis scam/hype/fraud. He was trying to have me disbarred and/or prosecuted since about 2012. Look at my blog posts about him (eg via the search box on the blog) for full details.

Lewis has never threatened me with a defamation suit either, though in my case my armour is, at least in part, my own impecuniosity.

Cash at bank…£666K“…ha.

Again, Wilson credits the losing defendants with far more than I would. They were guilty parties too, in my view. Surely Wilson does not also let the horrible Newbon (deceased) off the hook?

I note that Lewis, once a prolific tweeter, and even quite recently a daily tweeter, and who famously was caught out having bought tens of thousands of fake Twitter “followers”— he still claims over 27,000 (at one time his fake “followers” numbered nearly 80,000), has not, as of today’s date, tweeted for a full three weeks. He must know that the game is up. I think that he will soon scuttle back to Eilat (Israel), if he has not done so already.

Talking point

At least an arguable proposition, though those few shelves are hardly a library…

Part of my library c.2005, complete with library cat reading about ancient civilizations.

Library cat peruses The Secret Doctrine, by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_Doctrine].

More tweets

I agree with Farage on that point, but he too has not been steadfast.

Farage and Reform UK are pro-Israel, pro the Jewish lobby, not social-national, and so not “the answer” Britain needs.

Also, Farage has made it plain that he bases his hostility to mass immigration not on race and culture, but solely on general mass culture and on whether the immigrants “integrate”. I disagree.

Having said that, people cannot vote or flock to the banners of a party or movement that does not exist. At present, there is no credible social-national movement or party in the UK, a situation which has been the case since at least 2010 (when the BNP was destroyed), or maybe the 1970s or, arguably, since the start of the disastrous war against the German Reich in 1939.

What we have now is a situation in which the “Conservative” Party has been binned (though unfortunately not totally), and in which a fake “Labour” Party has, by reason of a ridiculously unfair and illogical electoral system, achieved a fake “landslide” by default, a “landslide” in which only 4 out of every 20 eligible voters (and 4 out of every 12 voting voters) voted Labour (and many even of those only because they wanted the “Con-men” and women binned.

Labour is already failing, and will achieve nothing in its projected 4-5 years up to 2029. However, the “Cons” are not a viable alternative, a fact underlined by the present uninspiring and mainly non-white leadership contest.

On that basis, Reform UK (which after all was voted for by over 4M voters, over 14% of the total) must be in with a good chance over the next 4-5 years.

Reform UK is not “the answer”, but it may be the start of an answer, or part of the answer, though the “Parliamentary road” is only one road.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_Kingdom_general_election#Full_results

Late music

[Tunis on a wet night]