Tag Archives: ICE

Diary Blog, 25 January 2026

Morning music

[El Escorial, Spain]

Morning thought

Until 1945 we were a party; after 1945 we are the nucleus of a great international faith…

[Savitri Devi]

Talking point

In War – Resolution , In Defeat – Defiance , In Victory – Magnanimity , In Peace – Goodwill

[Churchill]

Fine words, something Churchill was good at. Perhaps the only thing he was good at.

[Churchill, as Prime Minister in 1940, toting the drum-magazine Thompson
submachinegun when on an inspection trip to North-East England]

Talking point (first published 1 May 2021)

Starmer, the Jewish Lobby puppet, is (as I predicted from the start) hopeless and as dull as ditchwater, but he is no more “the problem” for Labour than was the rather different Corbyn.

Labour’s problem is that there is no longer a “proletariat” or (in the old sense) a “working class”, there is no more a bloc “Labour vote”, there are no more, or very few, “working class communities”, as such, no nationalized industries of any size, and no great loyalty to Labour, even in its traditional North and North-East heartlands.

The Labour Party itself has changed out of all recognition since its highest point of popularity in 1945. From being a largely socialist party, it moved to social-democracy and then, arguably, in the 1990s under Blair, ditched even that. It became really just a label (or as the egregious waste of space, freeloader, and careerist, Jess Phillips MP, put it, “just a ****ing rose“). Rather like those Latin American countries where the almost-identical parties distinguish themselves by colour: the Blancos v. the Colorados. Like football teams, or the racing silks in the Hippodrome at Byzantium.

It is hard to see now for what the Labour Party stands. Starmer seems to be saying that he supports almost all of what Boris-Idiot’s maladministration does, but that “Boris” should do it better!

In fact I saw a satirical comment to the effect that, were the “Conservative” misgovernment to reintroduce workhouses, Labour under Starmer would agree, but cavil that that should be done more efficiently and slightly more humanely! A joke? Yes, sort-of…but then look at the attack on the unemployed, disabled etc over the past 15-20 years. Which party really started that? Labour…Yes, the “Conservative” Jew-lobby regime of David Cameron-Levita made it worse, but all that nonsense started under Gordon Brown and his lunatic misgovernment, via Alastair Darling, Stephen Timms etc. They, not the Conservatives, brought in the crazily dysfunctional —and also dishonest— ATOS carpetbaggers, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_Capability_Assessment#History.

As I have often said, Labour is now basically the party of the blacks and browns and/or public service workers, which is why Labour eulogizes the NHS constantly (though the NHS is a very hit-and-miss service overall).

[from this blog, first published on 1 May 2021]

Reading it now, I think I can claim that my views then expressed have held up rather well almost 5 years later (nicht wahr?).

See:

Tweets seen

There is a sense of chaos about what is happening in parts of the USA at present.

[“The British government has passed legislation that criminalizes telling “offensive” jokes in public places.

If you go to a restaurant and tell a joke that makes an overhearing waiter in London feel offended, the establishment will have to report you to the police.

The government says it’s totally about protecting people from “harassment” and won’t infringe upon free speech rights at all.”]

The only answer, at least the only “peaceful” answer, to the gathering clouds of repression of free speech in the UK is to say or publish whatever you decide to say or write, then —if push comes to shove— stand up in the face of the poundland police state, refuse to accept any level or type of “guilt”, refuse to express any form of “apology” (the Jewish/Zionist/Israel lobby love it when they can force fake “apology” out of non-Jews), and refuse to accept untruth(s).

I stood up for both my own views and for freedom of expression generally both in 2016, when a pack of Israel-controlled Jews procured my disbarment (which disbarment was not only wrongful, but actually unlawful, as the Bar Standards Board admitted in a letter to me a couple of years later), and also in 2023-2024, when the same pack (nominally a different pack but in fact or effectively the same) procured (via political influence, and the suborning of police and “Clown” Prosecution Service personnel) a criminal prosecution of me: see

This blog, begun in late 2016, after my disbarment, and quite quickly published near-daily, continued to be published during the process of persecution, prosecution, trial, and sentencing.

In March 2024, the Jew-Zionists pressured the “Clown” Prosecution Service to apply for an order restricting publication of the blog, and the very “underwhelming” barrister instructed by them made a half-hearted attempt to secure that but, and to his credit, the very experienced District Judge who sentenced me (a former Deputy Chief Metropolitan Magistrate) agreed with me that the application was nonsense.

The blog continues to be published near-daily, and even were some further attempt to restrict it and me to be made, I should continue to publish, no matter what, and come what may, even if that meant arranging for publication via overseas proxies.

“They” never learn. Had I not been disbarred, I might never have started the blog.

Had I not been expelled from Twitter in 2018 (again at the instigation of Jew-Zionists, who organized a mass complaint about me, and also had political doormats such as the degenerate MP, Ian Austin —now a fake “lord”— write letters to the Attorney-General etc about me), I might well not have started daily or near-daily publication.

Now, having been persecuted/prosecuted (2023-2024), I am even more determined to continue to struggle for truth and a better society.

Greenland

Interesting. More up-to-date and consumerist than I previously should have thought, though less sophisticated than the newer malls etc of London, New York, Hong Kong, Dubai, Sydney etc. Ambience maybe somewhere between a shopping mall and a UK “indoor market”.

More:

Apparently, Nuuk is not connected to the rest of Greenland by any roads, only by sea or air: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuuk#Transportation.

Greenland is nearly 9x the size of the UK.

Talking point

More tweets

[“To be completely honest, I am becoming increasingly pissed off with the aggressive gangs of foreign men who are plaguing the streets of our towns and cities.

We can all see it. They don’t speak English, they don’t work, they certainly don’t respect us.

I get dozens of messages every single day from women who hate it. They feel uncomfortable, harassed, intimidated. But we’re all supposed to think it’s normal?!

It didn’t used to be like this. Five, ten years ago.

And it doesn’t have to be like this. It isn’t normal, and we shouldn’t accept it as so.

Women should be able to go for a night out with their friends without the fear of foreign sex pests and weirdos assaulting them.

Of course there are sordid and abusive British men, but sadly we can’t deport them.

We can remove the foreign ones. I thoroughly believe we should do so.“]

Britain needs a thoroughgoing chistka. Not just the migrant-invaders. Across the board.

Topical thought

Whatever the nuances, it is clear that the recent killing of a man by the members of an ICE squad in Minnesota was murder by any normal metric. It seems that the man was shot while defenceless and on the ground, and shot several times. One might ask why he was wandering around armed at all, but of course that is not so unusual in parts of the USA.

Leaving the specific question aside, and looking at the general demeanour of the ICE squad (in fact, all of those I have seen), and the way they move and interact, their behaviour, the impression given is not one of a disciplined unit, but something more akin to a street gang.

More tweets

For more on “Mark Lewis Lawyer”, Beth Grossman, Daniel Berke, Simon Myerson, Patron Law, James Wilson, and the whole sorry saga, use the blog’s search box.

[“At the end of the day, every time you talk to people about politics, the most common thing they will complain about is a complete lack of trust in the old parties of the system and the people in them.

And the reason this lack of trust exists is because of generations of people in those positions saying one thing and doing something else.

It doesn’t matter if people agree with absolutely everything you are telling them, if they can’t trust that what you are telling them is true, or they can’t be certain that what you are telling them is what you genuinely believe.

I’ve seen and heard it with my own eyes over the past few years, an uncountable number of nationalists get this wrong. They spend so much time creating this perfectly refined, contrived image of themselves, saying all the things that they think people agree with, and constantly treading on eggshells over certain topics – but it never works because anyone who engages with them in real life realises that they aren’t being truthful.

95% of people will be more likely to listen to someone whose views they don’t always agree with, but who they believe always tells the truth, than they will to someone who they never disagree with, but they don’t believe is honest.“]

Veritas omnia vincit.

30 years of service careerism“…

Burnham, though better —arguably— than Starmer-stein, is equally in the pocket of the Jew-Zionist-Israel lobby. System puppets.

Tully was a household name in India. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Tully.

Even a stopped clock is right once or twice a day (depending on what kind of clock it is).

For some people, wilful “belief” is far stronger than obvious reality sitting right in front of them. Look at how unpopular Starmer is! Also, what “restoration” of the economy is that idiot talking about?

Oh, I see now. “George Foulkes” is an ex-MP, now a “lord”, who was (maybe still is —I do not know) a noted expenses cheat and/or freeloader. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Foulkes,_Baron_Foulkes_of_Cumnock.

Tribal-Labour idiot. Also, a pro-Israel/Jewish lobby puppet. He supported the Iraq war even after it was long over, supported ID cards, supported anything that he was told to support, in order to keep his paid positions and preferment.

A disgusting corrupt slug, member of Labour Friends of Israel, and also someone convicted of hitting a policeman while drunk.

Undeniable.

Priti Patel was/is also an agent of influence for the Israeli state. Member of Conservative Friends of Israel. As blogged previously, had it not been for Idi Amin, she would have spent her life behind the counter of a Kampala grocery store. Thick as two short planks.

Priti Patel saying that Reform UK are “National Socialists“! If only!

Idiotic woman.

Would translate to a Commons with 374 Reform UK MPs, Lab 119, LibDems 60, SNP 41, Cons 14, Greens 7 [etc].

The Cons and Lab have both polled between 14% and 24% in the last few months, mostly between 15% and 22%. I do not think that Reform has polled, in the same period, below 24%, and has been, recently, as high as 35%.

Incidentally, on the above poll’s figures, Kemi Badenoch would lose her seat (as would Priti Patel).

Late music

[July 1941: the forces of the German Reich enter Riga (Latvia). Look at how happy the people are to welcome them (and to be rid of Soviet occupation and “others”)]

Diary Blog, 10 January 2026

Morning music

[Nevsky Prospekt, Leningrad, c.1950]

Saturday quiz

This week, a narrow victory over political journalist John Rentoul. I scored 5/10 as against his 4/10. I knew the answers to questions 1, 3, 4, 6, and 9.

Tweets seen

They must be afraid of Russian invasion. Very mistaken. Those times are long gone.

Madness. I had thought better of them.

Motzfeldt“?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivian_Motzfeldt

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josef_Motzfeldt

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Motzfeldt

There is no doubt that, if the USA assumes power over Greenland, the geopolitical position of the USA in the Arctic region will have improved, though it already has a base there; however, that presumed geopolitical advantage will have been bought (perhaps literally, if the Greenlanders are to be bribed) at the cost of (also) US relations with Denmark and most of the rest of Europe.

Like something out of Stalin’s Russia (arguably, though Stalin’s secret police usually tried to abduct people by stealth); perhaps more akin to the forced “recruitment” drives by the Kiev regime.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_3

Elon Musk is not wrong. Shocking, and also embarrassing for the UK.

Most of the repression of free speech in the UK, 90% or more, maybe even 99%, is driven by the Jew-Zionist/Israel lobby, and is carried out by, or by reason of, the “activism” (suborning by, demanding by, whining by) Israel-connected and Israeli Embassy-connected orgs such as “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”] and “UK Lawyers for Israel” [“UKLFI”].

The pro-Israel Jews call it “lawfare”, meaning the abuse of English and Scottish laws, and legal systems, including prosecutors and police, to shut down views which they want silenced.

More applicable to the UK than USA.

I would say that there should be free speech, i.e. speech and other expression, free of criminal sanction, and on any social, political, medical, scientific, or historical topic. The only spoken or written words that should attract criminal sanction would be direct threats to individuals, or to small groups (e.g. the local sports team, a particular team of Sky News or BBC News journalists, a specified individual church building or other specified religious building); there may be a few exceptions to that general rule of freedom, e.g. official secrets.

I cannot agree with Goodwin on several topics, including a few expressed there, in that short clip, but he is right about Starmer-stein’s fake Labour. Hopeless, anti-British, and incompetent to boot.

Our animal friends.

Nick Griffin’s blog

https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/venezuela-power-without-justice

Well worth reading.

[n.b. originally published on the following American website: https://libertarianism.uk/about/]

Late tweets seen

Anything is possible.

Very good.

See also:

The Chinese have always been known to be a clever people, at least as a collective.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/karl-turner-labour-prime-minister-government-times-radio-b2897989.html

The Independent’s 20-something scribbler also writes that Karl Turner is “a former barrister”. Wrong (as any real journalist should know). Once a barrister, always a barrister unless (like me) disbarred for whatever reason or at own request (in my case, wrongfully and unlawfully disbarred after a politically-motivated complaint by a pack of Jews), and that remains so even if (like Turner) someone fails to complete pupillage (on-the-job training) or is not actually working as a barrister for some other reason.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Turner_(British_politician)#Early_life_and_career

As for Turner’s MP-life, the next election in Kingston-upon-Hull East will be between Labour and Reform, and Labour will face a fight whether he is their candidate or not: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingston_upon_Hull_East.

I suppose that he might even fight as independent Labour or the like.

Translates to a Commons with about 393 Reform MPs (very solid majority), Lab 87 (very weak official Opposition), 54 LibDems, 45 SNP, 21 Cons, and 15 Greens [etc].

Promising, from my point of view…

Give up Eastern Ukraine to Russia, and negotiate for Kiev and Odessa to be either free cities or ruled by Russian/Ukrainian condominium agreement.

Late thought

So the USA under Trump is apparently willing to attack, invade, or otherwise take on, simultaneously, Venezuela, Greenland/Denmark, Iran, and even Russia, even China, not to mention smaller states such as North Korea and Yemen, and maybe even Canada.

The phrase or maxim about “taking on more than you can chew” comes to mind…

Late music

Diary Blog, 3 December 2025, including a few brief thoughts around the year 1940

Afternoon music

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannah_Peel]

Tweets seen

Israel-puppet “Tommy” seems unable to distinguish between a definitely-decided-upon plan of invasion and a mere contingency plan. The “plan” to invade the UK, Seelowe (Sealion), was a contingency plan. Under the right circumstances, it might have been actioned, and enough resources put in to make it feasible, but that never happened in or after 1940.

Hitler’s grand strategy, as of 1939-40, was either for the German Reich to join with the then-great British Empire (which Hitler admired) to rule much of the world (Britain as a seaborne empire and the Reich as one ruling northern Eurasia), or for there to be an uninvolved peace between the Reich and Britain (and also between the Reich and defeated France, along with its own widely-scattered colonies), giving the Reich the great possibility of defeating Sovietism and achieving huge Lebensraum (living-space) in the east of Europe and European Russia (especially the rich black-earth agricultural lands of the Ukraine, a country the same size as France).

The “Battle of Britain” arose out of the battle for France, which ended in German victory that same summer of 1940. The Germans were focussed on destroying the RAF airfields both in Northern France and in the southeast of England.

Why could German forces not invade England after the Fall of France? Several reasons.

Firstly, Hitler ideally wanted the British Empire as an ally or, failing that, as a hands-off bystander, not as a defeated enemy.

Secondly, and more practically (and as the British successes of the Battle of Britain proved), the Luftwaffe was simply unable to attain air supremacy, leaving any invasion fleet open to merciless RAF and Royal Navy (Fleet Air Arm) attack from the air.

Thirdly, the German army and navy were unable to source sufficient carrying or ferrying capacity to land an invasion force large enough to be likely to be able to establish and hold a bridgehead in the southeast of England.

In fact, this was known to the British government at the time; Churchill was well aware of it, but it suited him to keep the British population in a state of invasion-fear and panic, as well as spy-mania (the view, popularly held, that German spies were everywhere— yet another war myth only dispelled several decades later).

Seelowe (Sealion), was only a contingency plan, but not a merely “paper” one. It might, under more favourable circumstances, have been upgraded to a genuine operational plan ready to be put into effect. Never happened.

I was unaware that “Tommy Robinson” took an interest in WW2 grand strategy; or are (((those))) behind him the ones who take an interest?

More tweets

For a brief happy moment, I thought that that referred to the UK…

At best parasites, usually criminal or with criminal links, sometimes also terrorists.

Forget prison sentences. Wall. Squad. End.

British people are homeless while hostile and/or useless parasite untermenschen take much of the available social housing. A million more, every year, are arriving. Something will have to give. Society is starting to break apart in this country.

Those who know me know that farmers (eg in the UK) are not my favourite people, as a general group, but it is obvious that fake “Labour” is hitting them for one reason only (apart from grabbing money), which is that the farming community is almost entirely English/British, i.e. white Northern European.

Labour, on the other hand, has become a party dependent on non-white voting blocs: the Muslims, of various sorts, and blacks. I have not seen the opinion polls for a few days, but the last couple I saw had Labour on 15% and 20%. Pretty clear that very few white English people are now going to vote Labour.

Wall. Squad. End.

Quite.

There is little point in Reform doing a deal with the plainly-disappearing Con Party. At present, few Con MPs are likely to survive the next election.

My own use of Electoral Calculus comes to a slightly different result: Reform about 379 seats, Labour 82, LibDems 61, SNP 44, Cons 35, Greens 13 [etc]. A very solid Reform majority.

Who’s afraid of the big bad wolf?” (arguende)

Zelensky’s ricebowl is about to be taken away.

The ludicrous “Your Party” (currently opinion-polling at somewhere below 1%) is, in microcosm, the alliance seen more widely between the more “socialist” white Labourites and the Muslim (not infrequently, Islamist) voting bloc. It could never work. Ideologically, the two main components of “Your Party” have little if anything in common.

Even were the above to be left aside, the fact that “Your Party” has split before even having been fully launched will turn off 99% of voters. I never thought that “Your Party” (which may be renamed something else in the end, maybe “Party McParty Face Party”) would score more than a couple of Westminster seats, but now it looks as though it will just be Corbyn himself sitting there.

Of course, as that scribbler says, the Muslim voting bloc will not be going away, if only because somewhere around 11% of the whole UK population (no-one seems to know the real figure) is now Muslim.

More music

[The Castle, Nuremberg]

More tweets

Disgraceful, but par for the course in the contemporary UK.

I was sorry to see today that that young man has been incarcerated for his tweets (as I understand was the case; I am unfamiliar with the details of the matter, except that it seems to have been instigated by the usual pack of malicious Jew-Zionist fanatics).

A Crown Court case, but Morgan apparently pleaded guilty. Often a mistake. He may well have been better off taking his chances with a British jury (while they still exist).

I remember Morgan’s tweets from a couple of years ago; while I did not agree with all of them, many were worth seeing, and no-one should be imprisoned for socio-political tweeting, particularly when the prosecution is basically a Jewish-Zionist put-up job.

[“Got called a Nazi for being against trans ideology. Got called a Nazi for saying the illegals are a problem. Got called a Nazi for saying that Islam isn’t compatible with the West. Got called a Nazi for saying legals are scamming our visa system and government systems in general. Got called a Nazi for not wanting the English to become a minority in their own country. Got called a Nazi for calling for Remigration. Got called a Nazi for questioning foreign influence in our government and institutions. I really don’t care. Words are meaningless. England for the English. Britain for the British. Europe for Europeans.”]

Brava!

[“The government intends to replace most trials by jury with trial by judge alone. A judge from Leeds dealing with criminal cases, Recorder Simon Myerson KC, repeated on here the claim that I was the scum of the earth who was responsible for someone’s suicide. The claim was entirely false and my view is that Myerson is an obnoxious buffoon. I infer that Myerson was irrationally prejudiced against me, possibly over my views on Israel or because I annoyed his mate Mark Lewis. In what was an essentially secret process between judges, Myerson was investigated by another judge from Leeds, Lady Justice King. Despite the obnoxious and false claim, Myerson was only given a slap on the wrist by the Lady Chief Justice and the Lord Chancellor (a politician). Myerson continued sitting as a judge. Nice work if you can get it. The government intends to take away most decisions on whether someone is guilty of a serious criminal offence from a jury of 12 ordinary people. The plan is to give the decision to a judge alone, perhaps someone like Myerson. No doubt there are other judges like him, each with their own prejudices. Juries of 12 ordinary people play an essential role in ensuring justice is done and seen to be done. Public participation both legitimises the criminal process and functions as an essential check on state power. Abolishing trial by jury will lead to many more miscarriages of justice. No matter what your politics are, what is proposed is genuinely terrifying and cannot be allowed to happen.”]

Of course, Myerson was sacked in the end, not so long after he was appointed Recorder (p/t criminal judge).

Late music

[Arnold Bocklin, The Surf]