Newspaper review: Andrew Marr with two not very interesting women, one a newspaper journalist or editor, the other being Sarah Vine (looking at her, presumably Jewish or part-Jew), who is also the wife of —pro-Israel and pro-Jewish lobby— expenses cheat and cocaine-sniveller Michael Gove, a Cabinet minister [switches off…].
I dare say that the “royal prince’s” Google searches now include the enquiry “what is Royal Immunity and does it cover royal princes outside the scope of their official duties?”!
Interesting short film
I was sent this short film. Worth watching.
Meine Ehre heisst Treue
“There will be men who even without mentioning us because they will not be allowed or because they will fear to do so, will try to travel on that path of ours. And they will be fought and betrayed just as we were. But in the end, we will win, because good and true always triumphs over this world.” [Goebbels, 1945]
A Financial Times report and analysis by Sebastian Payne. Worth reading despite having been published a couple of weeks ago (and despite the fact that London-oriented Payne regards Swindon as being situate in the “south east”).
Priti Patel
What is worst, a Cabinet minister who is too thick for her job, one who is an Israeli agent of influence (maybe not just of influence), or one who is simply deceitful, unreliable and malicious? With Priti Patel, you don’t have to choose: she hits all of those…
Freedom of expression continues to disappear on YouTube
Good news: The antisemitic platform, TrueNews, has been banned from Youtube. Homophobe, antisemite, Rick Wiles– who spews disturbing garbage, is not a happy camper right now. https://t.co/jM73AXbEJ6
“They” always rejoice as free speech disappears. Others take the view that preventing exercise of free speech often has other consequences, perhaps less welcome.
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” [John F. Kennedy]
Sex pest MP Stephen Crabb visits Israel (again)
Pathetic sex-pest Stephen Crabb [Con, Preseli Pembrokeshire], whose political career foundered when he was caught sexting a teenager (and was then caught again, doing the same to another girl a year later….he’s very dim) has been once again in his beloved Israel (he’s one of the most pro-Israel MPs, because he thinks that Jews will help his career).
British MP @SCrabbPembs:
"The understanding we are coming to is that the Palestinians have to bring something more to the table than just a plea for sympathy and cash. Patience is running out." https://t.co/GAsSIhzIw0
Dishonest careerists and doormats for the Jewish lobby should not be MPs. Crabb is still an MP. Why? He is useless, cultureless, and poorly-educated to boot.
The report (written by a Jewish woman, it seems) says that a Jew who has made a (no doubt well-paid) career out of “hunting” elderly Germans and others supposedly involved in killing Jews in WW2 (or just being around at the time), is sad when such now-ancient Germans die (some are over 100 years of age) because he wants them to suffer more.
Decency is alien to “them”…
…and another point is that the Al Pacino TV series mentioned is actually, or in effect, an implied incitement to political violence (by Jews). Strange. I thought that the UK at least had laws against that. Must be that “it’s OK” when Jews do it…
Is this “justice”?
See the report below. A couple of years in prison (in reality) is totally inadequate for the hurt and damage caused. Were there evidential difficulties making a charge of GBH (s.20) or (better) GBH with intent (s.18) hard to prove? Or was it just easier for the CPS to agree guilty verdicts to the lesser offence(s)?
Why is this evil little monkey even in the UK? “Khaled Argoub“…”Forensic trace evidence from the victim also matched the DNA profile of Argoub. At 12.45am on August 24 police arrested him and charged him later that day.” In other words, he had been arrested (and almost certainly convicted previously, his DNA was on file and the police knew exactly where to find him.
Why did the Daily Mirror not detail his previous convictions and his racial/ethnic/national origins? Is he a so-called “asylum seeker? Odds-on, I am betting.
Ah, the Sun at least reported his origin: Algeria. I had guessed that much from the surname:
“Prince Charles’ biographer Tom Bower told MailOnline that the public is ‘finally seeing Meghan’s true nature and motives’. Her comments about the Queen’s decision smack of spiteful fury,’ he said. ‘I fear it will get worse.'” [Daily Mail]
As I predicted quite a long time ago now, Harry has become that staple of American sitcomland, the henpecked husband, run ragged by the demands of his young wife (though in this case, the Mulatta is 4 years older than Harry and is nearly 40). Seeing recent news footage of Harry and MM entering a room, she is obviously in charge. He defers to her and seems oddly nervous and hesitant. Has Harry had a breakdown of some kind? If so, is the Mulatta taking advantage of that?
The most incredible thing to me is that the royal establishment and msm seemed to expect the British public to accept, as an ersatz “royal”, an American mulatta or half-caste (“mixed-race” if you like…be my guest), previously married (and not long ago) to a Jew business type in Southern California! It’s just ridiculous.
It seems now that the Queen and the royal establishment are cutting their losses on Harry and the Mulatta; to put it another way, a branch of the royal tree has become diseased and so will be cut off and quietly disposed of.
Interesting story
An interesting story of how families and individuals are swept away to unexpected places by large-scale socio-political events. In this case (almost inevitably, in the msm), Jewish persons. It is often presented as if only Jews suffer anything in this world! But then, “they” are often the ones writing the history and the journalism…
Despite favouring Brexit, I never understood the “blue passports” idea. The original blue passports were larger than today’s passports and were a deep blue, made of stiff cardboard. They did seem somehow authoritative. I had my first one at age 16 (a lady who saw the photo, taken in a Photo-Me kiosk at a railway station, said that I looked like “a teenage thug”…). That was my first passport that I remember, but I must have had another one when I travelled alone to spend 3 weeks in Paris in 1971, aged 14. Cannot remember whether that was some kind of one-time passport or whatever.
The present passports are apparently the size they now are (a smaller size) and flexible because they have to be of that size and flexibility so that machines at airports etc can read them.
The UK passports, French, German, even US and other non-EU passports, are effectively the same now, and will be, despite the “blue passports” flim-flam. The NWO has standardized all passports and that will not change one iota because the colour changes. The human insect has to be trackable at all times…
“Did you hear the one about the Irish drug dealer?”
Apropos of nothing much, I just watched the film, Lady Caroline Lamb [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Caroline_Lamb_(film)] for the first time in 25 years. A quality production in every way. I believe that it is available in full on youtube, though in segments:
All well and good, but I do not recall Toby Young or any one of his friends defending my free speech when I was disbarred in 2016; or defending Alison Chabloz, convicted of singing satirical songs about “holocaust” fakes and frauds; or Jez Turner, actually imprisoned for saying that the Jews should be expelled from this country (again), as has happened at least twice before.
This is excellent news from South Georgia, & it shows that when humans stop exploiting other species they will recover in numbers again. Nature has a remarkable self healing ability & we need to learn to assist that, not block it as we do most of the time. https://t.co/d1YVOLKS7k
Just seen a report the blue whale is making a mega come back. A pod of 55 of seen off South Georgia, South Atlantic which is incredible because a blue whale can be the length of a football pitch .. now thought to be 10,000 swimming about only a few hundred 50 years ago .. BRILLO pic.twitter.com/jw0rpXyPaF
Saw circulation figures for last year. The Sun “newspaper” only sells about 1.3M copies now (if that— the 1.3M is a circulation figure). In living memory, indeed recent memory (1990s) it was around 3M. The Guardian circulation is (or was, a year ago) 134,000. In other words, only about 1 person out of 500 in the UK read the Guardian (in print) in 2019. Now? Maybe the 134,000 is around 120,000. Something like that.
Not one newspaper increased its circulation in 2019 over 2018. Some recorded falls as great as 18%. The Daily Telegraph circulation fell by 10%.
Of course, that does not take into account online readership, but I think that the Internet is culling newspapers in print, as Rupert Murdoch predicted years ago. Also, trust has been lost. Newspapers like the Daily Mail and Daily Mirror are using recent graduates in journalism, paying them peanuts for their often semi-literate drivel, and trying to push political agendas such as that promoted by the Jewish lobby. People are voting with their feet.
Sabisky
I speculated yesterday that maybe Sabisky was a reject from either MI5 or SIS and that that was the reason why so few details about him seem to be in the public domain. His university (which one? Was there one?); his marital status (he is said to have 4 children, despite only being 27 or 28 himself; who is his wife or “partner”?); where was he born, brought up etc? None of the msm has said anything about any of that, neither has his work history (if any) come to light. Sabisky is described in some newspaper reports as “an academic” but no specifics have been published. Was he a lecturer somewhere? We do not know.
In relation to the above, I see that there is a kefuffle about Sabisky never having been vetted. Well, maybe he was, even if a few years ago, if he was at one time a candidate member of SIS or MI5 on some kind of probation. It’s just a line of speculation, or what 1960s people would call a “riff”, but it would seem to fit the known facts, which include the fact that Sabisky was recruited by Dominic Cummings, whose own background (especially his time in Russia) is murky in parts.
She follows the trend of “Islamist” terrorists or would-be terrorists (both Muslims by birth and converts) in knowing next to nothing of her preferred religion. She apparently became a Muslim after her Muslim neighbours were “kind” to her.
It is clear even from the newspaper report that this person is, if not actually mentally unwell, then certainly “disturbed”. Psychiatric reports on her are being prepared.
The Mirror report gives few details of her life, but one can surmise that she is probably also of low IQ etc. Again, par for the course, looking at earlier cases, both in the UK and elsewhere.
Under other circumstances, she might have become (indeed, perhaps also was) a “refugees welcome” dimwit, an “antifa” idiot, and/or even a supporter of Jew-controlled anti-“hate” bodies such as “Hope not Hate” or even the “Campaign Against Antisemitism”. Stranger things have been known.
The accused was obviously easy meat for MI5 (or Anti-Terrorism Command police) entrapment (using the word in a lay, non-legal, sense). The FBI has been doing all that for decades in the USA.
A number of years ago, a similar person, an Irish autistic, converted to Islam, adhered to the then-feared ISIS barbarians, and tried to blow up the new shopping centre in central Exeter (which was not yet fully built when I still practised as a barrister there). The “Irish Muslim” failed, succeeding only in exploding a device in a loo into which he had locked himself. It detonated while he was unable to get out. Quite funny in a sense, but not for him. I believe that his injuries were grave. He only had himself to blame.
I suppose the lesson is that today’s “dedicated” terrorist, willing to kill and be killed, need not be, and in fact rarely is, any kind of deep thinker, let alone (if Muslim) an Islamic scholar. The warning flags are petty and non-political offences such as minor theft, minor drugs offences etc, isolation from general society, mental problems.
The dedicated terrorists of the past usually had a more or less thought-out ideology, some group discipline, a strategy. The list is long. In my mind would be the Russian and other anti-Romanov terrorists of the 19th and early 20th centuries (Bolsheviks, Narodnaya Volya, anarchists etc), the Jew terrorists of the period of British-Mandate Palestine (1918-1948),
the so-called “French Resistance” and similar groups elsewhere in WW2 occupied Western Europe, the Soviet-led partisans of Russia, Belorussia, Ukraine and Eastern Europe generally, EOKA in British-ruled Cyprus, the insurgents in British-ruled Malaya, the Irish Republican Army in Northern (and Southern) Ireland,
not forgetting the various “Loyalist” groups. As Oscar Wilde said, “the Ulster Unionist, always ready to foment a loyal rebellion”. Brilliant.
My above list is scarcely exhaustive. We could add the Basque terrorists of ETA (a particularly formidable group), the Palestinian or pro-Palestinian groups (leaving aside arguable justifications…) and many others. Algerian nationalists and the OAS were of particular importance in the early 1960s.
There were, in the 1970s, 1980s, less disciplined groups of terrorists and/or ones who verged on the ordinarily criminal: in Italy, the Red Brigades, Germany, the Rote Armee Fraktion or RAF, commonly known as the Baader-Meinhoff Gang, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Army_Faction and, in the UK, the pointless but committed and, in some cases, well-educated (if rather superficially) Angry Brigade: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Angry_Brigade
One cannot really compare even the least organized of the major terror or “urban guerrilla groups (even such as the “Carlos” —Ilyich Ramirez Sanchez— group) with today’s “Islamist” and other terrorists. Those others had, as already mentioned, ideologies, commitment, organization (up to a point), general aims and strategies, technical capabilities (look at the IRA’s bomb-making expertise, for example), and, often, help from State actors such as the GRU, Stasi etc.
Looking at the present wave of individual or small-group terrorists (often infiltrated or set-up by provocateurs) one can see that the damage that they do in society is outweighed, in the collective mind of the State, by the PR assistance they give to the State, their acts suggesting that the organs of the State need more power, more legal help, more money, more staff etc.
The Jews (the Israel/Zionist lobby) pressured the local people via the Vatican to change the Play. One example is Jesus Christ praying in Hebrew (most scholars believe that His usual spoken language was Aramaic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_of_Jesus, though it is true that He may have used spoken Hebrew too for sacramental purposes).
Most importantly, the Play as now performed has had removed the original Biblical line, “Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children” [from Matthew 27:25)(King James version; the version used in Germany is not identical but has the same meaning]; “the people” there meaning “the Jews”.
I suppose that most readers of this blog are aware of the mainly Jew-Zionist “Hope not Hate” organization, which is fairly well-funded, staffed mainly (certainly at the higher level) by Jews, and which has managed to worm its way into the confidence of a number of sadly thick MPs and others over the years. It even targeted me peripherally, mentioning me and my blog a couple of years ago in its “State of Hate” publication, along with David Irving, Alison Chabloz, David Icke and many others.
“Hope not Hate” even had an “undercover” operative, Patrik “The Rat” Hermansson, talk to me at a clifftop cafe overlooking the English Channel. I had been asked to meet him by a third party. The Rat was at the time using the cover of a Swedish student interested in social-national personalities in the UK.
I was mildly suspicious, but felt that I owed the third party a favour, so agreed. I had nothing to hide, and in fact belong to no political or other organizations, so why not? I made sure to keep the conversation innocuous. I had no idea that I was being (illegally) filmed and audiotaped by “Hope not Hate”. They had some stupid idea of producing a film about nationalist and social-national people in the UK and USA. In fact, they did make such a film a year or two ago but (as I predicted when I heard about it) it was a damp squib, being shown only on one or two obscure Scandinavian and Belgian stations late at night. Result, as also predicted, zero.
Now it seems that Nick Lowles, the Jew “antifascist” Witchfinder-General of HnH, has resigned.
Amusingly, Lowles became the victim of his own tactics a few years ago:
“In February 2016 Nick Lowles was “de-platformed” from a National Union of Students event by NUS Black Students, which said that he was Islamophobic.” [Wikipedia]
From where does the HnH money come?
“[Sigrid] Rausing is a supporter of Hope Not Hate. On 1st December 2018 the Sigrid Rausing Trust began a grant of £450,000 over 3 years to Hope Not Hate. By that point, Hope Not Hate had received £615,000 from the Sigrid Rausing Trust.“
One can only suppose that even a woman as rich as Sigrid Rausing does not take kindly to being ripped off by grifters (as seems may have been the case with “Hope not Hate”)…
By the way, this is what the “Hope not Hate” cabal said of me, in its 2018 “State of Hate” overview:
“Ian Millard is a former barrister, expelled from the Bar in October 2016 after having posted a series of antisemitic tweets glorifying Hitler’s Nazi Party and calling the thenJustice Secretary Michael Gove a “pro-Zionist, pro-Jew expenses cheat”. Summary of 2017 During 2017, Millard continued to be vocal online, especially on his website and blog where he calls for a complete replacement of the Parliament by a “social nationalist” government. In February, he also spoke at the London Forum on “The Zionist assault on freedom of expression in England”.“
I have to say, even if immodestly, that my tweet about “pro-Zionist, pro-Jew expenses cheat” Michael Gove has worn rather well! I can now add “cocaine abusing” to Gove’s description. Here is the little bastard, drunk or drugged or both, in the Chamber of the House of Commons:
As for Lowles, all sorts of scurrilous allegations about him are surfacing on social media, from payment of a very large salary (and “expenses”) to outright theft or embezzlement:
In fact, the Jews who head the various so-called “anti-racist” or “antifascist” organizations in the UK are commonly also criminals and gangsters. Look at this one, for example:
Ah well…at least that one has gone up the chimney.
Ruth Smeeth, the ex-MP (Stoke on Trent North, 2015-19), Israel lobby loudmouth, CIA/MOSSAD source and “antifa” overseer (and who is on the board of “Hope not Hate”) is descended on the maternal side from Jew gangsters in the 1930s East London razor gangs milieu. Appalling. Is she paid for her HnH “work”? If so, how much?
Lisa Nandy
Lisa Nandy has now nailed her colours to the mast, coming out as even more pro-Jewish lobby than the other two remaining contenders for the Labour leadership.
Many Labour members and supporters are sick of the way in which the Jewish lobby, via such puppets, is orchestrating the return of Labour to (((the fold)))…
Nandy by making herself a lackey of the Zionist lobby has got zero chance of becoming Leader!
This is brilliant! Really made me laugh! General Election 2019. The half-Jew CIA/MOSSAD source, Jewish lobby loudmouth and “Hope not Hate”/”antifa” overseer, Ruth Smeeth, discovers that she has lost her House of Commons seat (Stoke-on-Trent North: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Smeeth) and is probably permanently washed-up as a politician (click on picture):
Yes, Ruth Smeeth, former (?) “strictly protected source” at the US Embassy in London (see Wikileaks), thought that she was embedded as an MP indefinitely. Ha ha! She and her fellow-Jew MPs in Labour wanted rid of Corbyn, in fact wanted to prevent Labour from winning the 2019 General Election. “They” succeeded in that, but only at the cost of their own seats! They sawed off the branch on which they were sitting! “I’m lovin’ it!”…
A cleansing interlude
Priti Patel and her immigration proposals
Priti Patel is an ingrate: I have never seen one word from her thanking Idi Amin for taking power in Uganda, without which Priti Patel would have spent her life behind the counter of a Kampala grocery shop. Still there it is.
Now Priti Patel, as Home Secretary (yes, being at least an Israeli agent of influence is no bar to Cabinet status these days) has outlined the Boris-idiot approach to immigration. No low-skilled migrants, apparently. I have no quarrel with that, but then Priti Patel went on to say that “high-skilled” migrants with university degrees, good job offers etc are acceptable. What does that mean? I fear that it means “Indians who can work a computer”, or have “degrees” bought at great cost (with or without actual merit) in that very corrupt country, or who have family and friends willing to “offer” a “job” in the UK…
Britain should start from the default position that we only want people of, at minimum, European race and culture. After that, by all means lay down extra restrictions.
Can Britain even be called a “democracy” now?
Thanks to Jew-lobby puppet Tony Blair, Britain now has a political structure by which a political party has to be “approved” in order to exist and stand candidates at elections. The Electoral Commission does this work of repression. One example:
Patriotic Alternative are to the right of the BNP. They support deportation of non-whites and openly share antisemitic materials online. @ElectoralCommUK must not let them form a political party. https://t.co/rcwTXb5R7f
Stuchbery poses, not very credibly, as both “historian” and “journalist”.
Switzerland
What has happened to what was one of the best countries in the world? I suppose that the answer is multifold: an atheist tendency; a moneygrasping tendency; reduction of voting age to 18 —and for some elections, 16 (was once 28); enfranchisement of women (I think since the 1980s); a strong Jew/Zionist influence; the general decadence of the age; mass immigration. General vulgarity? General stupidity? Now this, as one symptom:
Fourth in the World: Food in the nude: Switzerland to get its first naked restaurant. Where is this world heading towards. #Paris#London & list goes on. #NakedRestaurentshttps://t.co/VJ0d5Yv6Ji via @TheLocalSwitzer
This is what a popular government, unafraid of the people, looks like
[by the way, that cruise liner for German workers was launched at a time, 1939, when the best that most British people could hope for would be a week in Blackpool or a similar place]
A few more thoughts about Andrew Sabisky
I find myself wondering again about the Sabisky affair. Strange that the newspapers have revealed few details about him. The only personal details I can glean, from various sources, have been that he was homeschooled, but also briefly attended two (presumably minor) independent schools, that he is 27 (some reports say 28) and that his father is Finance Director of the trade union, Unite. One report says, implausibly (?) that he is the father of no less than four children.
Nothing about his national or ethnic background. Nothing about where he went to university, in fact nothing about whether he did attend a university, though I suppose that he did, because almost everyone and his dog attends something at least called a university, these days. He has been referred to as an “academic”, for what that is now worth.
No detail about where he worked (if anywhere) previously. It even occurred to me that he might have been some probationary member of MI5 or MI6 who was found unsuitable. Seems incredible, but so far there is no evidence in the public domain as to what he did get up to between the ages of 18 and 27.
Well, Andrew Sabisky, of whom I had never heard until he joined Dominic Cummings’ “weirdos and misfits”, has resigned, thus pre-empting his probable sacking.
What is the reality behind all of this? If you believe that Sabisky was ruled completely unsuitable because of his allegedly “horrific” views or behaviour, then you are not aware of the mountains looming behind the immediate view.
Were Sabisky’s views so terrible? It is said that he got some statistics wrong, some of “the science” wrong etc. Well, that would worry No.10, which even in the past decade has pushed ahead with policies (and with ministers and advisors proposing those policies) in the face of the preponderance of the known facts: examples would include the HS2 high-speed rail vanity project, the gigantic mess of a so-called “reform” of the “welfare”/social security system launched by Iain Dunce Duncan Smith, the whole nonsense “austerity” policy of David-Cameron-Levita and George Osborne etc.
Forget the small details. Look at the reality: IQ is lower on average in black countries, as compared to Northern Europe. There may be various reasons why that is so, from testing methodology to diet to education to whatever, but the facts are indisputable, really. Anyone who has visited other countries (outside Europe…in fact even in parts of Southern Europe, such as Bulgaria and Romania) knows that a good proportion of their populations is as thick as two short planks by Northern European standards. Not a judgment buttressed here by a ton of pointless statistics and contrived reasons, just the plain truth. And that is why this Sabisky person was sacked— because he spoke the plain truth.
Yes, there are exceptional individuals from the IQ point of view among the blacks and browns. Yes, there are mentally-weak individuals in the “white” Northern European countries or populations. We must make fair overall assessment. For example, I happened to be watching University Challenge yesterday. One team was dominated by an exceptionally well-informed black (really, mixed race) American, whom I had seen on a previous programme, and whose impressive knowledge was rendered even more impressive by the fact that he was from Jamaica, Queens (New York, not the Caribbean island of Jamaica), which is a pretty poor area not far from Kennedy Airport. It is not a place from where many international scholarship students emerge (I myself once went through that area, when my first wife took a wrong turn in leaving the airport). Yes, but that is one exceptionally able individual, an anomaly.
The Twittersphere went mad about Sabisky, though Twitter is really not very important. Most of those commenting now are merely “useful idiots” for the System or the Jewish lobby. More significantly, the msm went mad, the System political drones too. Why? They were willing to say “so what?” about such matters as Michael Gove snorting cocaine and/or being filmed drunk as a skunk in the Chamber of the House of Commons, or pathetic Jewish lobby puppet Stephen Crabb repeatedly and despairingly “sexting” teenage girls, or Priti Patel acting as an Israeli agent.
As for Sabisky himself, his origins and education are not so easy to discover, despite his sudden notoriety. He was apparently “home-schooled” by his own mother, though he also spent two brief periods at independent schools (unnamed; presumably not famous ones):
Obviously, with a name like Sabisky, the “superforecaster” is at least partly of non-UK origin. Looking at him, I would not be surprised to discover a part-Jew origin. I may be mistaken, I suppose. If anyone has anything (informational) to add, use the comments section below.
Sabisky’s father is Finance Director for the trade union Unite.
The Independent has published a piece by “antifa” person “Dr” Louise Raw; though she does possess a doctorate of sorts (from a “university” or other institution which she is very coy about identifying), she is not an academic; neither is she an historian in the usually-accepted sense (her “doctorate” was on one particular industrial dispute of 1888). Her main activity (apart from tweeting) seems to be occasionally talking on BBC Radio London and doing a (monthly, I believe) column for the Morning Star. She is, of course, not a scientist in any sense, so her “warning” about Eugenics carries no weight whatsoever.
Perhaps people should be asking, not “is Eugenics valid?” but “what in the Eugenics canon is valid?” (cf. “holocaust”).
Reverting as to why such a fuss about Sabisky, I think that the answer lies in the so-called Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan, sometimes called “the Great Replacement”:
The international conspiracy (or “consensus”, if you like), also called by such names as “The Wise Men of the West” and, in a certain mode following their project, “the New World Order”, has decided that the future lies in North America and that, therefore, Europe is to be weakened and destroyed as a hub of world power, but kept as an economic building block of the NWO. How? By mixing the Europeans ethnically with Arabs, blacks etc. Particularly the Northern Europeans are to be wiped out as a distinct collection of peoples. The Great Replacement.
Thus it is that we see TV ads, soaps, films which show, increasingly, mixed-race couples, families, children etc. The plan has been carried out so blatantly in the UK that millions of British people are starting to ask “why is it that every family showm in ads has a mixed black-white couple (etc)?” Even a couple of Labour MPs asked that.
The idea is to make normal the idea of mixed relationships, marriages, children. The better future for Britain and Europe will thus be replaced by a worse future. The same idea lies behind all the fake “race relations”, “hate speech” and other stuff of that kind. The idiots applaud, of course, not even realizing that they are being used.
The ideas espoused by Sabisky, apparently mostly a few years ago, but brought out now by those hostile to them, stand in opposition to the plans of the international conspiracy. They had to be removed from proximity to government. Sabisky therefore also had to go. No dissent from the dictatorial and evil Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan will be allowed.
The midnight hour approaches…
Well, here we are, with no time to discuss other issues. In that case, just some music:
The family concerned has had its home repossessed by the local council. Without going into the reasons and merits of that repossession (and without examining why the acquaintances of the 15-year-old son think that it is OK to make fun of his homelessness), one can see:
that the council in question is staffed by idiots;
the effect of mass immigration on services available to British people.
Firstly, the council. The council no longer runs the school but still owns the bungalow. It does not need that bungalow for a new school caretaker. Why could the family not be allowed to stay, paying extra rent or even market rent?
The council has laid out what must have been hundreds of thousands of pounds to alternately bring the action and then to defend the result in the higher courts. Is this money well spent? The council could even, for that money, have bought at least one such bungalow elsewhere and rented it to the family in question (or to someone else).
Immigration: we see that there is very little spare accommodation available to councils, even for emergencies. When a country imports literally millions(since 1997, perhaps 11 million) and those immigrants are breeding fast, this is what happens. Hertfordshire and Essex become, in their urban areas, Calcutta and Kingston. Don’t believe me? Visit, say, Ilford, Essex and doubt no more…
The “refugees welcome” dimwits and “multikultis” will say that all (“all”?!) that is required is for local councils, or central government, or Uncle Tom Cobbley, to house anyone requiring housing. Just like that. Manna from Heaven. Pie in the sky. If only life were that simple!
A sad story, and a tale of unnecessary suffering.
Mike Stuchbery’s case against Tommy Robinson
If anyone is following the legal proceedings of self-styled “historian”, “journalist” and antifa rear-echelon cheerleader Mike Stuchbery against Tommy Robinson, my blog post (updated every few days) can be found here:
So far, Stuchbery and his UK supporters have raised £11,594 from mug donors, but it is a mystery what has happened to that money. His one-man-band Pakistani solicitor (there may be a second solicitor involved) sent a “Letter before Action” to “Tommy Robinson” (sub nom Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) in November 2019. Since then, nothing. I have blogged (see above) repeatedly that I do not think that any action will be launched, or will be successful if launched.
Anyone wanting to read more about Stuchbery can do so here:
What a deadhead! It also shows that Lisa Nandy is yet another post-Blair political box-ticker, politically-correct agenda constantly at hand. She has, like others, obviously not thought this through.
Labour is a joke now. Boris-idiot is embedded in No.10 for at least 2 years and quite possibly nearly 4 years. Whatever Labour does in the next 2+ years is supremely irrelevant.
Even when I was at school in Sydney (1967-69), a Holden was a rara avis. I knew not one person who owned one. My family and their friends and wider circle owned Fords, VWs, Mercedes, even one Rolls-Royce, but no Holdens. Occasionally one would be seen on the road, but not often.
Sabisky
So when Dominic Cummings put out an advert for 'weirdos' to work in Number 10, it turns out he meant supporters of Eugenics. Deeply sinister. Andrew Sabisky should be nowhere near government. https://t.co/whzaPXsV5D
“…should be nowhere near government“…says a thick black barrister (practised for about 3 years in criminal law before becoming an MP at age 28, having also been in the USA for a year or so). Basically a black “racist” who believes in corporal punishment, supports the Jewish lobby (which is why he is often on TV and elsewhere in the msm), and thinks that white European people are the source of most of the evil in this world.
Thick? Yes. Don’t assume that a law degree, Bar qualification or whatever signifies high intellect or knowledge these days. Lammy even thought that reference to the colour of the smoke of the Sistine Chapel at a Papal conclave was “a silly racist joke”!
Lammy is also a liar, having said (to give but one example) that his mother raised him in conditions of poverty alleviated by Tax Credits, an easily-rebutted claim in view of the fact that tax credits of that sort were only introduced when Lammy was aged 31 (though there were other low-income credits before that, so in fairness it may just be that Lammy was not lying but just talking confused rubbish. He often does).
Lammy also claimed recently (on Twitter) that “[his] ancestors died fighting this shit”, by which he apparently meant white European civilization. What “ancestors”? What “shit”? If his ancestors died fighting anything, it was in African tribal wars, or maybe in riots on British streets (though that seems unlikely). Hard to know where else the ancestors of this African-race Guyanese might have “died fighting”. Perhaps Lammy will enlighten us.
Anyway, the good news is that Lammy, who actually managed to get promotion to junior minister under Blair/Brown (tokenism?), will probably never be “anywhere near government” himself now. By the time that Labour wins another general election, he will be at least 50 and quite possibly 150!
The scalded reaction of the msm, many System politicians and the Twittersphere indicates to me that Sabisky was at least on the right track overall, even if not in every detail.
This was almost literally “15 minutes of fame”…
Baddiel and “holocaust” “denial”
I see that the Jew TV face, David Baddiel, has done a show about so-called “holocaust” “denial”, i.e. about the modern-day heroes and heroines who examine this whole narrative sometimes termed “The Hoax of the Twentieth Century”, people who are treated as heretics and, in a few countries, actually prosecuted as modern heretics.
It is telling that Baddiel did not include these people (from a newspaper report, seems that maybe there was only one person) on his previous series, Heretics. That is because those people, including the nasty comedienne, Jo Brand, are not heretics, just nasty squalid people who, like Baddiel, get paid large amounts for being “edgy” in a fake way. Not real “heretics” by any means.
So there had to be a special show to trash a view of modern history that is claiming more adherents every day. I shall not be watching Baddiel’s show. I could almost predict its content, minute by minute, anyway. A waste of time.
It may well be that people adherent to Islam and/or Labour want to silence Katie Hopkins, but she is deluding herself if she cannot see that Jewish interests are behind the attacks on her. Sadly, she seems intent on trying to curry favour with the Jewish lobby, which will not work (even if she is part-Jew herself). They hate her. Still, that seems to be the path she has chosen…
The Master Race
I saw this tweet by ignorant rent-a-mouth James O’Brien:
I’ve never encountered a believer in a ‘master race’ who would come close to qualifying for membership.
The term “Master Race” is or can be misleading. It tends to conjure a picture of a latter-day Nietzschean “blond beast”, complete with equally Nietzschean whip, lashing the “inferior breeds” into submission and obedience.
In reality, what is or should be meant is that History or (to put it another way) the “evolution of consciousness” through Time, requires at any given moment an advanced element, which (though that advanced element may or may not have the keys to world power) “leads” that evolution simply by being the most advanced in terms of evolution.
There are also backward or laggard elements. We are talking about races, nations, groups, not necessarily about individuals within any of those races, nations or groups.
The leading racial/national/group element will tend to have more power than the rest, but that is by no means always so.
I start —very late— today, and with thanks to “Claudius”, an occasional commentator on the comment pages of my blog, who sent me the following short piece on Irish history; well worth reading:
In relation to the part of that article dealing with the Jewish-Zionist influence in contemporary Ireland, it seems that the existence of even a few “embedded” Jew Zionists (embedded in the “Establishment” or local power structure) can ruin a country. Indeed, that may be the result of even one such “embedded” Jew, as with Barbara Lerner Spectre in Sweden: see below).
[note the typical disconnect between “smiling” and any reason to smile. As someone once put it, “the simulacrum of the human”. Like a faulty electrical connection].
Another aspect of all this (and which affects the advanced parts of the world generally) is the existence and influence of the unpleasant System puppet, Greta Thunberg:
Where to start? Firstly, “Labour” and the “Conservatives” are not “two sides” politically in any meaningful sense. Two faces of one lying whole. The BBC is pushing the whole multikulti agenda to the max. It lies to the British people time and again, it pushes and promotes every kind of decadence, and that is before we even consider its overpayment of its supposed “stars”. Why is the former footballer Gary Lineker paid something like £2M a year to shoot the breeze about his sport? Why are newsreaders paid hundreds of thousands of pounds per year? And so on.
I am in favour of “public service broadcasting”, but most of the time the BBC is not it…
The Mayor of London cannot distinguish reality from semblance
Trans women are women. Trans men are men. Non-binary people are non-binary. All gender identities are valid. #LGBTHistoryMonth
There was a time when Sadiq Khan was spoken of as a possible leader of the Labour Party and even as a potential Prime Minister. That was then. Since then, he has failed to prevent multikulti London becoming a crime-ridden ant-heap split between masses of downtrodden people and the few who buy Georgian houses, fortify them, then excavate vast 10-storey dystopia-cellars below ground. In Xanadu, did Kubla Khan a stately pleasure-dome decree…
As always, credit where due: at least Sadiq Khan, by retaining his Tooting seat in 2010, prevented the evil Mark Clarke from becoming an MP. Clarke himself now has no prospect of ever becoming an MP and has been sacked at least twice for being a sex-pest. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Clarke_(politician)
Well, what can one say? Doormatting for the Jew lobby, trying to curry favour with the wealthy or influential Jews (the rest are not of interest to her or Labour, because even en bloc they represent only 300,000 votes and most of them vote Conservative anyway). She also seems not particularly intelligent. And why quote the “IHRA definition” of “antisemitism” when it has been “adopted” by only about 15 countries out of nearly 200? Is that more doormatting?
Rebecca Long-Bailey may or may not become Labour leader (it seems unlikely) but whether she does or not, she will never be Prime Minister. I mean, just look at her…
Oh, God…look at this! She’s just a lunatic, or at least an unthinking “me too-er”:
“I want the right to self ID and I want that enshrined in law”#Marr asks if Labour leadership candidate Rebecca Long-Bailey will reform the 2010 Equality Act which upholds the right to single sex spaceshttps://t.co/98s1CEmj0Ypic.twitter.com/wEHVElNX73
I had no great interest in Rebecca Long-Bailey previously and knew little about her, but I see now what a very poor candidate she is. She is a walking, purse-lipped collection of politically-correct soundbites. How can she even in her wildest dreams see herself as a Prime Minister?!
Listening to Twitter clips of Rebecca Long-Bailey and her supporter Angela Rayner (candidate for Deputy Leader) on the Marr show, I really think that Labour must be on the way out, despite the fact that it had very considerable support among younger voters (under the age of 25, especially) at the 2019 General Election.
Long-Bailey disagrees with Corbyn: “I do not think it’s right to call Israel or the creation of Israel a racist endeavour; I think that’s antisemitic” https://t.co/roF3v42Hia
How does Rebecca Long-Bailey consider that Israel as a state is not a “racist endeavour”? It was founded by Jews for Jews! Yes, they do employ some others, mainly the Palestinian Arabs whose ancestors they defeated in their ethnic-cleansing war of 1948. Does that change the nature of the state? The whole enterprise is a Jew ethnostate! That is one reason (as well as a place to dump the Jews that Hitler wanted out of the Reich, out of Europe) why the Reich did not oppose its — then only potential— founding.
[Jerusalem, 1930s]
Ireland
After the recent Irish General Election, many are trawling news from past decades…
Watched a new episode of Endeavour. Quite well-executed as always, but the “agenda”, as in other series such as Grantchester etc, becomes so very obvious that it is silly. Every second character is black, South Asian or gay. This in the Oxford of 1970! Even the tinker “gypsy” children who find one of the bodies near their caravans are playing football with a black boy; and the mother of a “racist” teenager who is stabbed later blames the “British Movement” and its Parliamentary candidate, so redeeming herself as a true multikulti convertee. All a bit too desperate…
Endeavour has also continued the Inspector Morse and Lewis tradition of a few subtle or not so subtle jests in each film. In this case, a Bangladeshi restaurant called The Jolly Rajah and an apartment building called Tiffin Court…
Even leaving the above gripes aside, the plot this time was nowhere near as good as in most if not all previous episodes.
Hypocrisy Corner…
Tomorrow and the day after people will read attacks in the papers against people, echoed by social media which will lead to depression and death. The same people who mourn #ripcarolineflack will join the press’s hounding of others.
A few things about which the former fireplace salesman and (briefly) Defence Secretary (now Education Secretary) might think, as he plays with his pet spider and formulates ludicrous plans to “take on” Russia with converted tractors sporting machine guns and Coca-Cola trucks made into missile launch vehicles…
I did not much like what I saw (on TV) of Bercow: my primary criticism of his behaviour is that he was biased. He openly ranted against the BNP to the schoolchildren’s play “Parliament”, at a time when the BNP were within sight of winning a few seats, in 2009 or 2010. A silly and nasty little person, who seemed unable to control his drunken slut of a wife.
Historical note
It’s an extraordinary thought that there is probably more time BETWEEN the painting of these two horses at Chauvet cave (>30,000 years ago) and Niaux cave (~15,000 years ago) as there is between the Niaux cave art and us #IceAgeArtpic.twitter.com/ZFAq7m2Abf
Mr Miller, 54, was speaking on the steps of the High Court on Friday morning after partially winning his case against the force which descended on his workplace in response to a tweet they deemed to be “transphobic”.
The limerick, which was posted on social media, was recorded as a “hate incident”, despite the police admitting that no crime was committed.” [Hull Live]
“He argued that Humberside Police, following the College of Policing’s guidance, had sought to “dissuade him (Mr Miller) from expressing himself on such issues in the future”, which he said was “contrary to his fundamental right to freedom of expression”.
The judge said Mr Miller strongly denies being prejudiced against transgender people, and regards himself as taking part in the “ongoing debate” about reform of the Gender Recognition Act 2004, which the Government consulted on in 2018.
Announcing the court’s decision, Mr Justice Julian Knowles said: “The claimant’s tweets were lawful and that there was not the slightest risk that he would commit a criminal offence by continuing to tweet.
“I find the combination of the police visiting the claimant’s place of work, and their subsequent statements in relation to the possibility of prosecution, were a disproportionate interference with the claimant’s right to freedom of expression because of their potential chilling effect.”
The judge added that the effect of the police turning up at Mr Miller’s place of work “because of his political opinions must not be underestimated”.
He continued: “To do so would be to undervalue a cardinal democratic freedom. In this country we have never had a Cheka, a Gestapo or a Stasi. We have never lived in an Orwellian society.” [Grimsby Live]
cc. Barnet Police, Essex Police etc!
It occurs to me that, just as Gandhi promoted the idea of “mass disobedience” in India, the users of social media might simply, en masse, refuse to go along with the nonsense that has been imposed for many years past, certainly since the Blair elected dictatorship passed the very bad law known as Communications Act 2003, s.127): http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/section/127
Twitter users and others should take their courage in their hands and surge through the trammels put in their way by bad law and manipulative special interest groups such as the Jewish lobby.
Dominic Cummings and the Boris-idiot reshuffle
This is the person now effectively in charge of what passes for a government of the UK, in a situation where the part-Jew sociopath posing as Prime Minister cannot do anything but come up with schoolboy plans to build bridges over oceans etc:
I can't get enough of Dominic Cummings thinking he is a genius but actually being a certifiable nobheadpic.twitter.com/eYzlGDUzBC
This is like some low-budget sci-fi/futuristic film, in which the government is run secretly from a rubbish-strewn inner London street and by someone whose only camouflage missing is a stack of copies of The Big Issue.
Meanwhile, as in the days of the more corrupt late-Roman emperors, or the mid-1970s’ Harold Wilson government of “Lady Forkbender” and her “Lavender List”, influence and indeed power is wielded not only by some eccentric posing as a dystopian “genius” but also by the “ho” of the idiot trying to pose as Prime Minister of this poor country.
Boris-idiot has a problem, because he himself is actually incapable of running the proverbial whelk stall. His metier is that of the part-Jew public entertainer.
What makes it worse is that Dominic Cummings is actually right on several issues, such as, inter alia, the need to deport black and other criminals— and the equally important need to stop the HS2 madness.
Suella Braverman
“Suella Braverman…is mesmerically dim, with the new attorney general’s latest Channel 4 News interview suggesting not only that she could be outperformed at the dispatch box but that she could be outperformed by the dispatch box. Or indeed any other item of furniture in the Palace of Westminster.” [Marina Hyde, in The Guardian]
Just in case you weren't sufficiently worried for Britain, here's new Attorney General Suella Braverman – displaying all the intellectual clarity of a discarded potato salad that's been left to rot in the baking sun for two weeks.pic.twitter.com/6xgmOR5hQ5
Suella Braverman is yet another post-1997 political drone (elected 2015) who thinks that it is terribly clever to keep repeating the same phrases. I suppose that there are many average Joes who, reading the Daily Mail, Sun etc, think that a woman who is a barrister and has appeared in the High Court frequently must be highly intelligent, but those of us who have or have had similar status (and, as in my case, were also frequently in the High Court at one time) are harder to convince!
Lisa Nandy
Bin her. Bin her. Bin her. Das ist’s!
La vie litteraire francaise…
The Cabinet of idiots
“Whitehall is now littered with…secretaries of state such as Gavin Williamson, while Liz Truss – who’d lose a battle of wits with an emoji – is the longest serving cabinet minister.”
“I’m afraid Johnson’s much-vaunted reshuffle this week merely served as a reminder that the only positive discrimination scheme in this country that has long functioned to the highest level is the one that puts idiots in the cabinet. By this metric, the loss of Andrea Leadsom is a blow, but one that’s more than made up for by the promotion of the likes of Oliver Dowden, Alok Sharma, Anne-Marie Trevelyan and Suella Braverman. Braverman in particular is mesmerically dim, with the new attorney general’s latest Channel 4 News interview suggesting not only that she could be outperformed at the dispatch box but that she could be outperformed by the dispatch box. Or indeed any other item of furniture in the Palace of Westminster.” [Marina Hyde, The Guardian]
If only, after 1945, the European powers had agreed to co-operate in developing Africa as a continent, populating it with white people, taking care of the Africans, the wildlife, the environment, creating towns, cities, farms, with the environment, the animals, the birds being protected. No “African nationalists”, no corrupt and hopelessly incompetent African dictators or greedy African “democratic” politicians, no predation by marauders, whether African armed bands or greedy transnational companies.
In 1920, Conrad wrote this about a discussion about that real event of 1894:
“…we recalled the already old story of the attempt to blow up the Greenwich Observatory; a blood-stained inanity of so fatuous a kind that it was impossible to fathom its origin by any reasonable or even unreasonable process of thought. For perverse unreason has its own logical processes. But that outrage could not be laid hold of mentally in any sort of way, so that one remained faced by the fact of a man blown to bits for nothing even most remotely resembling an idea, anarchistic or other. As to the outer wall of the Observatory it did not show as much as the faintest crack. I pointed all this out to my friend, who remained silent for a while and then remarked in his characteristically casual and omniscient manner: “Oh, that fellow was half an idiot”.” [Wikipedia re. Conrad— The Secret Agent: A Simple Tale]
The supposed attempt on the Royal Observatory has in the past been described as “pure terrorism”, in that there could be no direct political “reason” to explode a bomb at or destroy the Observatory. I say “supposed” attempt because it was never proven, though it is hard to imagine any other reason why an anarchist carrying a bomb would climb the hill from Greenwich. Anyone who has been there knows that, to this day, the Royal Observatory stands alone, apart from an ice-cream shack etc, at the highest point of Greenwich Park; there is there no obvious other potential target:
In more recent years, that is in the 1990s, the Provisional IRA blew up buildings in London etc, trying as far as possible not to injure or kill anyone. That secondary intention was not born out of compassion or military decency, but purely out of reasoned calculation: destruction of important buildings in the City of London and elsewhere hit the “British Establishment” but resulted in little or no public outrage.
That campaign of the 1990s was in fact the polar opposite of the 1970s bombings of the Provisionals. Those 1970s attacks were poorly conceived from the political point of view and were, in some of the most outrageous examples, designed to kill or injure as many people as possible. The targeted buildings were often pubs sometimes frequented by British soldiers (entirely or almost entirely “other ranks”) as well as by civilian members of the public.
The Baltic Exchange was one such 1990s attack. I happened to hear the massive bomb detonate. At the time, I was in a small cafe-restaurant in Bloomsbury, nearly 3 miles away, with my then girlfriend. The sound of a bomb of that sort is distinctive. I remarked on it. We were puzzled.
In fact, despite the evening timing, the location of the target (uncrowded in evening) and a 20-minute warning, three people were killed (and 91 injured).
The IRA (in collaboration, inconsistently, with Sinn Fein) had a political purpose and a strategy. Basically, a United Ireland, achieved via making Northern Ireland too much of a nuisance to hold on to.
It could be argued that, despite the apparent sincerity of the “peace talks” that led eventually to the Good Friday Agreement, Sinn Fein/IRA “won”, strategically: power sharing in a democratic Northern Ireland (which is leading over time to a Catholic/Republican and so Sinn Fein victory, via the greater birth rate of the Catholic/Republican community); as Mosley predicted decades before, greater concordance of Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic within the EU (until Brexit, at least…); Sinn Fein to pursue a peaceful political strategy in the South— which seemed unrealistic and even quixotic to me, but not now that —over 20 years on— Sinn Fein has become the most significant political party in the Republic and may form a government:
Other “terrorist” campaigns have been launched over the years and decades, but they have all had serious political aims: Jews against the British in Palestine, Arabs against the Jews in Palestine/Israel, Communists and Social-Revolutionaries in imperial Russia etc.
Now let us move to these “Islamist” terrorists (in the UK) of recent years. They appear to have no directing brain or organization, and any “allegiance” to the main body of the ISIS barbarians seems to be little more than notional.
More than that, the individuals seem to want to create havoc as far as they can, but in the absence of heavy-duty weaponry can only do so using whatever weapons are freely available: knives, axes etc, cold weapons generally.
Targets have generally been ordinary members of the public. Even the police have mostly been killed or injured not because they were the main targets, but because they became involved in the course of fulfilling their duty.
What is the political aim of the “Islamist” terrorist? There seems to be none, save for a generalized or “pie in the sky” wish that the UK, along with the rest of Europe and the rest of the world, turns to Islam and adopts Sharia law. I suppose that that desire might be described as having been the aim of Islam since its foundation in the 7th Century:
The term “Islamist” is in fact only a convenient label. It appears that the recent UK “Islamist” terrorists, such as the Streatham attacker, knew little of their own religion.
Certainly most have not been noted as having attended specifically-Islamic madrassahs. The Streatham attacker had attended secular schools in or near London and was only 20 at time of death.
No attempt has, as yet, been made by such “Islamists” (in the UK) to assassinate any famous politician or high-ranking military figure. That may be purely because the “Islamist” terrorists, as “lone wolves” or small groups, have not the ability or means to undertake reconnaissance or intelligence work in order to discover addresses, schedules, daily habits etc.
The recent “Islamist” attackers have no real political or religious aims. The connecting thread seems to be a wish to hurt and kill non-Muslims and to achieve a spurious “martyrdom” by being “killed in battle”, i.e. shot by police or SAS during an incident. The secular equivalent is called, in the USA, “suicide by cop”. They have no real strategy and their tactics are pathetic. They not only have no prospect of success or victory but also no way of even forming a conception of what such success or victory might look like.
In short, “Islamist” terrorism, like Islam itself, is a dead end. Islamist terrorism can lead to nothing on the socio-political level and its only results are, and can only be, death. Death for any victims, and death for the “Islamists” themselves. A form of evil not seen in Europe previously, even during the Mongol invasion of the 13th Century.
What can be done? Nothing, directly. If a state has within its borders millions of Muslims, a certain small proportion of them will fall victim, in their own uneducated or semi-educated minds, to Islamism. Perhaps one in a thousand. There are about 3 million Muslims in the UK, so maybe 3,000 potential terrorists. In fact, that is the figure the police are suggesting [see Notes, below]. Others may also be radicalized, usually blacks of non-Muslim origin.
The only long term solution is for Britain to become an ethnostate, and Europe a collection of ethnostates. In the meantime, these stupid, pointless and unpleasant attacks will continue.
Regret truncated blog yesterday, 11 February 2020. Computer had to be taken away and powerwashed; it only now returns to the fray. All the same, the article on the recent “Islamist” terror attacks will be posted both here and on the diary blog for 11 February 2020 when finished.
The HS2 decision is a very bad one, very obviously taken so that Boris-idiot can be seen to be doing “big things”. Environmentally harmful, a trashing of the green and pleasant land. So much even in transport could be done for £120 BN or more. New branch lines, robot ultralight train lines etc. Terrible.
The HS2 decision does show that David Cameron-Levita-Schlumberger’s faked-up “austerity” policies of 2010-2017 were driven purely by an ideology of repression. One day, that bastard (and Osborne, and Dunce Duncan Smith, and “lord” Freud etc) must be personally punished for their crimes.
Here we have what this ZOG Cabinet is really all about: repression of free speech in the guise of both preventing “terrorism” and “protecting children”. The American cartoon below, several years old now, again hits the spot exactly.
A pathetic camp drone from the NSPCC was on Radio 4 Today Programme, supporting this evil ZOG policy. Wants as much “regulation” as possible. I’m sure that he does.
“Harmful content”? Yeah, right….We know what that means. Anything which is for a Northern European culture and civilization. Anything of which the Jew-Zionists disapprove. Anything against the “Great Replacement” of Europeans by non-whites. Anything that challenges the fakery and hoaxes of the “holocaust” farrago.
Amy Lamé, paid £75,000 a year from public funds to do not very much as “Night Czar” for London. Sadiq Khan decided on this useless post and its generous remuneration (generous bearing in mind that this gigantic and unpleasant lesbian is actually doing other “showbiz” work of some kind). Much more than a nurse gets; more than some junior doctors get. What kind of sick society is this?
Yesterday heard a little, on radio, of Corbyn in the Commons (on Monday, I think). Yapping about black criminals being deported (and how bad that is, apparently). So far about 17 of the bastards have gone. The rest will be released, it seems, to prey again. Anyway, 17 or 30 out of hundreds of thousands? It’s a drop in the ocean. And what about the “rappers” and “music” “artistes” who are encouraging violence towards (mainly) white people (the people formerly known as “English”)? They should be “offed” too, either to Jamaica etc or, well, just “offed”… Maybe I should “rap” about it…
So…Corbyn. I had all but forgotten that he is still posing as Labour leader. He failed to beat the Jew lobby in his own party, he surrounded himself with black (and brown and white) deadhead MPs. He made speeches in favour of the tinker “traveller” riff-raff, failed to take the fight to the Zionists in the UK and paid lip-service to the largely-faked “holocaust” farrago. Corbyn is just a joke. Kick him off his pedestal now, the useless brainless polytechnic lecturer and NUS politico! I could kick him off myself, he is so irritating! He (and political idiot John McDonnell, a slimy “me-too” poundland “Communist”) had a real chance to totally mainstream anti-Zionism, but failed to go nuclear when he might have won the election had he done so. Bin him.
The “Special Relationship” one-way street
Anyone who, like me, has lived in the USA, knows that the “Special Relationship” means little outside British TV studios, radio studios and newspaper offices. It is a one-way street. Quasi-colonial, with Britain as the colony. To hell with it.
PM surprisingly agrees with Corbyn that the US extradition treaty is “unbalanced”
I have mentioned in many blogs the fake “charity” “Campaign Against Antisemitism”. Well, here’s another: “Institute of Economic Affairs”, here (below) represented by some callow youth who might be sent, usefully, to a labour camp where he can work for his pay or food instead of spouting about how UK citizens should become economic serfs of the uber-wealthy few.
Ian Robert Millard 