Tag Archives: landlords

Diary Blog, 7 April 2026

Morning music

[Cambridge: unusually-snowy view across the Backs to Kings College Chapel]

Tweets seen

Reminded me of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_(1950_film).

[still photo from The Wicker Man (1973) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wicker_Man]

Interesting. My own “political compass” was assessed as being very similar; on the same graphic, slightly lower and slightly to the left of tweeter Sophie Meaden.

As to the chalked message, it is said that the old Soviet Spetsnaz had an unofficial saying: “when the real revolution comes, we shall not kill those with big houses and cars, and we shall not kill those who talk about social justice, but we shall kill those with big houses and cars who talk about social justice.”

Were they wrong, looking at the UK, USA etc today?

Usually, it is the supposed “anti-racists” who are loonie: see

Incidentally, guess what (((ethno-cultural tribe))) comprises many, perhaps most, psychiatrists in the USA? That’s right— “them”.

Translates to a Commons with about 323 Reform UK MPs (3 short of overall majority), 71 Cons (very weak official Opposition), 63 Greens, 62 LibDems, 59 Lab, 44 SNP [etc].

So there it is. Reform still the only game in town but, crucially, needing support to govern.

Also, as with the last (?) 15-20 opinion polls, this one shows Starmer as very likely to lose his own seat. I think that Starmer will quite likely decide not to lead Labour into the next general election. He must see the writing on the wall, surely.

The —in Hitler’s phrase— “dirty democratic politicians” always place personal interest, and then party interest, above national or world interest. We saw that in the UK in, to take just one example, the extended —and totally unnecessary— “lockdowns” etc during the 2020-2022 “Covid” nonsense (panicdemic/scamdemic).

For once, the Starmer-Labour government does something worthwhile.

One change not made, but which should be made, is to abolish rental deposits. Inconvenient, irritating (when repaid or not repaid at end of tenancy), and unnecessary anyway (the landlord-parasites need not be potentially out of pocket, because they can just tack a small amount onto each weekly, monthly, or other durational rent payment).

A horrible tribe.

One officer with access and a sidearm could end this madness.

[“Until 1976, you could walk into a shop in London, England called Harrods and buy a lion, a camel, or an elephant. In 1969, two young Australians named John Rendall and Ace Bourke walked in and bought a three-month-old lion cub.

They named him Christian. He lived with them above a furniture shop, played in local gardens, and rode around the city in the back of a convertible. When he outgrew London, they flew him to Kenya, where a conservationist named George Adamson released him into the wild in the Kora National Reserve.

A year later, the two men flew back to find him. Adamson warned them Christian was now fully wild and might not remember them. Despite being the head of a wild pride, Christian recognised them immediately and ran to greet them. The reunion was filmed, and the footage has since been viewed over 100 million times.

Christian was last seen in early 1973, heading north. He was never seen again.“]

A beautiful documentary film; I saw it many years ago.

Our animal friends.

A different film about Africa:

[“From the 1920s to the 1960s, around 10,000 shoe shops across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada had X-ray machines built into the floor. You put your feet inside a wooden cabinet and looked through a viewing hole at the top to see the bones of your feet glowing inside the shoes.

Children loved it. Parents thought it meant a better fit. Nobody told them they were standing directly on top of an unshielded X-ray tube, absorbing radiation that scattered straight up through their legs and body every time.

In 1999, Time magazine named it one of the 100 worst ideas of the 20th century.“]

I remember doing that occasionally, maybe once per year, at one of the two now-long-gone smallish department stores in Reading (Berkshire, UK), either Wellstead’s or Heelas, maybe the former, having been taken there by my mother. Early to mid-1960s.

In the 1967 film Billion Dollar Brain, Harry Palmer (Michael Caine) uses one of those fluoroscopes (aka “pedoscopes”) to look inside a Thermos flask:

Britain should leave NATO, and cultivate far better relations with Russia. We could get oil and gas for our people at cost price, or even below cost price. This is a realistic possibility.

Late music

Diary Blog, 8 August 2025, including what happens if the Gulf Stream stops, and James Wilson’s continuing legal battle with Jew-Zionist lawyers and perjurers including the notorious “Mark Lewis Lawyer”

Afternoon music

[Rivendell]

Tweets seen

I can think of one way…

See also:

Who really are the 11% so stupid that they think the migrant-invaders “share the same values” as us? Or are they malicious? I rather think the latter.

Interesting report about the Gulf Stream

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14982353/Gulf-Stream-weakening-300-YEARS.html

The Gulf Stream has been getting weaker for much longer than we thought – and it could be on the verge of total collapse due to climate change

According to British scientists, the Gulf Stream – which is part of a much wider global system of ocean currents – moved northwards 300 years ago. 

This, they say, is a sign that it started slowing down then – before the Industrial Revolution and about 200 years earlier than previously believed.

And the ‘sensitive’ system could soon ‘cross a tipping point’ prior to its total collapse. 

The Gulf Stream is a major ocean current that moves warm surface water from Mexico northward across the Atlantic towards Europe.

It’s one of the most important natural weather systems, keeping northern and western Europe warm.

When it collapses, it could plummet Europe into a deep freeze reminiscent of the Hollywood film ‘The Day After Tomorrow’. 

In the 2004 movie, the Thames freezes over and the Houses of Parliament are smothered in a deep layer of snow.

[Daily Mail]

See also:

More tweets seen

There is a global…”problem”… of which this is merely part. You could even say “two global problems“.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oreshnik_(missile)

A warning to both Germany and Poland.

[“Vladimir Zelensky hopes to use the West’s help to force Russia to unconditionally stop the SMO, says Viktor Medvedchuk. “Zelensky needs Russia to end the conflict unconditionally, but he himself has no intention of ending it”, Medvedchuk stated. He called Zelensky a political clown who knows how to beg and whine but is completely incapable of solving political issues at any level.“]

Why should Russia freeze the situation, when it is steadily, albeit slowly, taking over the whole of Ukraine east of the Dnieper?

[“The decision about Ukraine is made exclusively by Putin. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky does not even have to come to the negotiations, because the terms of peace will be dictated exclusively by Russia — said American journalist Clayton Morris. “Zelensky decides nothing. He can send a letter or one of his subjects — it doesn’t matter, because all the cards are in Putin’s hands,” he said.“]

Sochi is scarcely a strategic or other military target. Why do the “Western” ((( msm))) not report on these crimes by the Zelensky regime?

Wall. Squad. End.

In the early 1930s, Germany faced problems almost as bad as (in some respects, worse than) the UK in the 2020s. National Socialism solved most of the more obvious challenges to decent ordered life, and was then able to look to the future. That the “you know who”-ridden outside world (finance-capitalist West, Stalinist/socialist East) turned on Germany from 1939 does not take away the immense achievements of 1933-1939, the years of peace.

That tweet refers to the aftermath of the libel case Wilson v. Mendelsohn, Newbon (deceased), and Cantor, which was launched by Northern academic James Wilson after a campaign of harassment by a pack of malicious Zionist Jews.

During the currency of the matter, the defendants’ Jewish solicitors (Daniel Berke of “3D Solicitors” of Manchester, and the notorious Mark Lewis of Patron Law, West London), and Counsel (Beth Grossman, of Doughty Street Chambers, London) appear in various degrees to have been incompetent and/or dishonest. The defendants’ (arguende, perjuring) Jewish/Zionist witnesses (every single one was a Jew) were simply not believed by the trial judge.

James Wilson won his case against the odds (and much dishonest Jewish chicanery) and now is actually trying to save defeated defendant Cantor from losing his house as a result of the negligence and dishonesty of Cantor’s fellow-Jews, and particularly “Mark Lewis Lawyer”.

I have to say that the successful claimant, Wilson, appears to be a great deal more forgiving than I would have been in his place. Wilson is now trying to save one of the Jews who targeted him, which Jew has been thrown to the wolves by his own Jewish lawyers and a number of other prominent Jew-Zionists who urged on the defence case against Wilson. Those other Jews, and the Jewish lawyers involved, have been trying to wash their hands of their default(s).

I have blogged extensively about the aftermath of this case, and about (in general, too) the self-promoting yet incompetent and dishonest Jew-Zionist solicitor, Mark Lewis. Use the search box on this blog for more.

As for the other losing defendants in that matter, I know little about Mendelsohn. As to Newbon (a vicious pro-Israel social media troll, whose own university, Northumbria, had to discipline him repeatedly), he killed himself rather than face up to the consequences of his badness.

At one time, Jews were not even allowed to become barristers in England and Wales (until the Jews Relief Act 1858 was passed, by which time the political influence bought by their money had permeated English society in the Victorian age).

Readers of the blog will be able to guess what my views on this subject are.

Incidentally, and while I am very rusty on the current law — I ceased active practice in 2008, and was wrongly and in fact unlawfully disbarred at the instigation of a connected packs of Jews —inc., in the shadows, “Mark Lewis Lawyer”— in 2016, my understanding is that legal professional privilege is not available against a barrister’s own client. Legal professional privilege, which protects confidential communications between a lawyer and client for the purpose of legal advice or litigation, is intended to benefit the client, not to shield the lawyer from disclosure to the client.

In this case, Cantor has (Wilson says) asked his former lawyers to disclose.

A few pertinent quotations, found here and there:

  • Purpose of the Exemption: Legal professional privilege exists to encourage open and honest communication between clients and their legal advisors, ensuring clients can fully disclose information relevant to their case without fear of that information being disclosed to others. 
  • Who Benefits? This privilege is solely for the benefit of the client, not the lawyer. A barrister cannot claim privilege to withhold information from their own client. 
  • Duty of Confidentiality: Barristers have a strict duty of confidentiality to their clients, but this duty is not absolute. It is subject to exceptions, such as where disclosure is required by law or where the client provides informed consent for disclosure. 
  • Client’s Right to Information: Clients have a right to access information held by their barrister relating to their case, including confidential communications, unless specific exemptions apply. 
  • Examples of Disclosure to Client: This includes, but is not limited to, the barrister’s advice, opinions of counsel, experts’ reports, and other documents relevant to the case. 

Incidentally, I have recently found AI (Artificial Intelligence) to be a wonderful resource in various areas of study or research. This, below, is what it has to say about Legal Professional Privilege:

Legal professional privilege

LPP protects confidential communications between a client and their lawyer, including barristers, and is a right held by the client. There are two main types: 

  • Legal advice privilege: Covers confidential communications for the purpose of seeking or giving legal advice.
  • Litigation privilege: Covers confidential communications made for the dominant purpose of obtaining advice or evidence for existing or reasonably contemplated litigation. 

Exceptions where LPP does NOT apply

LPP has limited exceptions where a barrister might be required or permitted to disclose information, even to their own client: 

  • Iniquity Exception: LPP does not apply if the client seeks advice to further a crime, fraud, or similar conduct.
  • Waiver by the client: The client can waive privilege, either expressly or implicitly.
  • Disclosure required or permitted by law: Statutory or regulatory obligations may compel disclosure, such as reporting suspicions of money laundering.
  • Public Interest Immunity (PII): A court may order non-disclosure based on PII, where the public interest in withholding information outweighs the public interest in disclosure. 

In summary, while a barrister generally must protect client confidentiality and uphold LPP, exceptions exist when the client seeks advice to further a crime, or when disclosure is required by law or court order.”

It can be seen that at least one exception (Waiver) might well apply. to the Cantor/Wilson matter. Possibly “Iniquity Exception” and/or “Public Interest” as well.

Looks as though Beth Grossman is on a loser (again).

Beth Grossman and “Mark Lewis Lawyer” must both be squirming.

I think that he should.

If Beth Grossman is going to take an absurdly bad point of the sort mooted by her chambers, Doughty Street Chambers, then it says something about her, arguende

The two surviving Jew defendants may eventually sue “Mark Lewis Lawyer” and the other defence solicitors and Counsel. We shall see.

Lewis has no or significant assets within the jurisdiction (England and Wales), though he is believed to own a flat in Eilat, Israel, a fact which was concealed from the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal. When Lewis was found guilty by the that Tribunal in 2018, his own (unpaid) Counsel said to the Tribunal that “Lewis has no assets except his own clothes, a used mobility scooter, and a private pension worth £70 a week”…so much for the supposed great defamation lawyer!

So Lewis can only be (effectively) sued jointly and severally with others, notably his fellow partners in the Patron Law firm. Presumably, he has professional indemnity insurance, though.

When I was a practising barrister, I had indemnity insurance, as all barristers are expected to carry. I was never sued anyway, but when I was instructed or “briefed” by a London law firm to draft contracts for the transhipment and sale of oil, my insurance had to be very radically increased, because even one shipment was worth tens of millions of U.S. dollars.

Late tweets seen

[“Pakistani Tariq Islam kidnapped a 12-year-old British schoolgirl on the pretext of playing. He forced her to take drugs and alcohol. He r*ped her several times and invited three more Pakistani friends. The 12-year-old girl was tortured and overdosed on drugs, leaving her with permanent brain and body damage. The perverts who appeared in court said they had no regrets. This happened in Leeds, UK. We urgently need mass deportations.“]

In this case, though, not deportation but a wall, a squad, and an end (to the untermenschen).

Parasites, as well as traitors.

Refer to previous comment.

Landlordism is parasitism. That is not, as such, a political statement, but one that is simply an expression of reality.

[“Zelensky admitted that Ukraine cannot retake the territories occupied by the Russian army by military means, and it is necessary to resort to diplomatic options This was reported by the British The Telegraph, claiming that Ukraine is ready for a ceasefire without recognizing Russia’s control over the new Russian territories, referring to the constitution of Ukraine. At the same time, the British publication does not report Ukraine’s readiness to withdraw the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the Donetsk People’s Republic and the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions.“]

Late music

Diary Blog, 28 March 2024

Morning music

[Prague before the Second World War: Old Town, Cathedral, Vltava, Charles Bridge]

Tweets seen

Ukraine is falling to pieces. Having said that, many of Britain’s roads are now little better.

No doubt the pro-immigration, pro-multikulti drones (paid or amateur) will be flooding social media and the msm with “it was ever thus“, “London was always like that” etc. No. Not true. Not on this scale. 100x worse than it was in the 1970s, let alone 1950s.

PUTIN: EUROPE IS FEAR-MONGERING ABOUT ME TO FEED ZELENSKY “What they say about us, that we’re going to attack Europe after Ukraine, is complete nonsense. It’s intimidation of their own population solely to get money out of them. This is happening in the context of the fact that their economies are sinking, and standards of living are falling.” Source: @Sputnik

Is it untrue? I think not. Look at the UK. Gradually falling to pieces, and really not so slowly now.

https://twitter.com/djuric_zlatko/status/1773088839617151127

A reference to those detained and convicted in relation to the recent terrorist attack in Moscow, who may spend their lives as of now in so-called “coffin” cells measuring 4-6 square metres; cells as tiny as 6 feet by 6.

It troubles me that the apparent terrorists were treated with such brutality, verging on sadism (to say the very least), on the day when they were detained; also, that the now-mandated conditions of detention seem worse than simply inhumane; as bad as, or worse, than those suffered by some prisoners in America’s “Supermax” prisons.

It is not that I think that the terrorists “deserve” better treatment but rather, that to treat even such individuals as they have been treated and continue to be treated, diminishes Russia itself, just as Guantanamo, Bagram, Abu Ghraib etc diminished, and continue to diminish, America.

More tweets

Not if a multiheaded civil war happens in the UK, but when and exactly how. Sometime in the next couple of decades. Probably within one decade.

More music

[Akademgorodok, Western Siberia]

Late tweets seen

Terrible, but even so swamped by the total of supposedly “lawful” migration— hundreds of thousands every single year now.

From the horse’s mouth. Pity, though, that Jewish-lobby creature Jenrick cannot use English properly: it’s “uninterested“, not “disinterested“, in this and similar cases. A common, and irritating, mistake in modern English usage.

As for Sunak, and as said many times before on the blog, a little Indian money-juggler who does not look like, behave like, nor think like a Prime Minister of the UK.

https://www.mattgoodwin.org/p/are-the-british-tories-dying

It seems that Goodwin reads this blog. Actually, I have reason to believe that he does. In the past, when his views were rather different (pre-2018), Goodwin blocked me on Twitter. Good to see that he has at least partly woken up.

The endgame will either be later this year or, perhaps more likely, after the national elections in the USA and UK, so sometime in 2025.

Late music

Crowdfunder

https://www.givesendgo.com/GC14J

If you can donate, thank you; if you cannot donate, please share the link. Thank you.