Tag Archives: Vilnius

Diary Blog, 13 September 2026

Afternoon music

[Volga tatarka in traditional dress]

On the blog 3 years ago

On the blog 2 years ago

On the blog 1 year ago

Tweets seen

After the fall of the Kiev regime, Zelensky must be brought to Russia for trial. If that should prove impossible, he should be eliminated in the field.

Our animal friends.

I examined Macron’s very peculiar background on the blog 7 years ago, in 2019: see

[“Lavrov: Ukraine no longer exists – it has abandoned all the principles for which we recognized it as a state.

“THE KYIV REGIME HAS ERASED THE LEGAL FOUNDATIONS ON WHICH MOSCOW RECOGNIZED UKRAINE.”

Sergey LAVROV: “Russia will not pause its special operation during the peace process in Ukraine. If Vladimir Zelensky wants a meeting, let him come to Moscow. That is already a significant gesture of goodwill on our part. Because he has not yet canceled his decree banning negotiations.”

Russia recognized Ukraine at the time of the collapse of the USSR based on its Declaration of Independence from 1990. In that document, the Verkhovna Rada (the Ukrainian parliament) pledged that the country would be non-nuclear, neutral, and non-aligned. The Kyiv regime is currently ignoring all three of these fundamental commitments, effectively nullifying the old agreements between the countries.“]

Ukraine has never really been a state. In its past 35 years of nominal statehood, it has always been a fake state and/or failed state. Now, it exists purely by reason of Western resupply of arms, ammunition, and money. Take those away, and it falls within a month, possibly within a week.

Israeli Jew war criminal. It would be wonderful if a missile landed on him and his evil tribe.

Britain should be cultivating better relations with Russia and, as one result, getting cheap gas and maybe also oil from Russia, as well as a huge market for British goods and services.

Stop poking the Bear…

Interesting and possibly significant.

That bastard Sikorski again. Married to the Jewish writer Anne Applebaum. A dyed-in-the-wool ZOG/NWO puppet.

I think that his character is shown in his features.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rados%C5%82aw_Sikorski

Reform’s biggest and best point has nothing to do with Reform itself but with the hatred and contempt felt nationwide against LibLabCon.

Britische Freikorps.

Get the bastard up against a wall. Wall. Squad. End.

To me, that shows mainly that “Who-He?” Burnham has no very interesting ideas or policies, is seen as boring (even if less offensive than Starmer-stein) and is also seen as merely a “continuity Labour-label” and (in real political terms) unmandated Prime Minister, a Prime Minister in name only.

As to Owen Jones, the now-affluent “licensed Bolshevik” pseudo-revolutionary, I assessed him on the blog many years ago: see

Fairly interesting vlog post about North Korea (mainly Pyongyang)

A near-autarky in a fairly small country (smaller than England, one-and-a-half times the size of Scotland) is hard to implement successfully. Then of course there is the lack of personal freedom aspect.

I was struck by the depth of the Pyongyang metro system, at over 300 ft deep about 3 or 4 times, or more, the depth of most of the London Underground (the deepest London station is Hampstead, just under 200 ft deep).

Presumably, the Pyongyang metro is also meant to be a mass bomb shelter.

…and one about Japan

A different perspective than the usual.

More tweets

Not something I myself support as such but, on the other hand, such a result would weaken the grip of “the usual suspects” (((them))), and also make Britain’s membership of NATO untenable. Swings and roundabouts.

Those smaller units (Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland) are not really economically viable as states (once what amounts to English subsidy is withdrawn), but could nonetheless become states politically; their populations would, however, have to accept radically lower living standards forever as a result.

England would become far better off economically, especially once the population becomes fully or almost-fully European.

It is absurd to the point of ludicrousness that that uncultured, uneducated, really rather dim “chavscum” woman, with her “vapes”, tattoos etc, should be a member of a British Cabinet. I myself find it almost unbelievable, even taking into account how decadent and washed-up this country now is.

Critcizes Farage and Reform etc, yet her own party, fake “Labour”, has taken money from every kind of sleazy moneybags, not to mention having been tied up, via Mandelson, with Epstein and other criminal Jews.

Angela Rayner herself was, not very long ago, shovelling into her handbag bribe-monies for clothes, trips here and there, even entry to louche vulgar nightclubs in Ibiza.

Another idiot, someone who wants to lead (from the rear?) as the tiny army, navy, and air force of the UK take on the might —and it is still might— of Russia (and China?), Russia alone having anything up to 7,000 nuclear weapons, including some that cannot be intercepted, and which could reduce London and indeed South Shropshire (his own constituency) to a charred irradiated ruin within something like half an hour.

Anderson at least has military experience (for 9 years aged 16-25, i.e. 1992- 2001), but only at private-soldier level (apparently, he also has a diploma, more recently earned, in Defence Studies, from some institute or other).

I notice that he is a (former) alcoholic, has struggled with mental health in the past, and is a member of some cranky evangelical sect, more or less a cult: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_Church.

Also noticed, that Anderson has been both a failed businessman and a bit of an expenses blodger: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Anderson_(politician).

Anderson will probably not be an MP after the next general election. Last time, in 2024, his vote-share was 34.1%, the LibDem received 31%, and the Reform candidate 17.8%. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Shropshire_(constituency)#Elections_in_the_2020s.

Not entirely seriously, perhaps he should form his own volunteer regiment, with himself as colonel of that regiment, Kemi Badenoch as honorary colonel-in-chief, and a rank-and-file consisting of South Shropshire pensioners (Conservative Party voters). The cap badge could be a (charred and irradiated) golly on a stick.

Excellent. Excellent.

If both USA and EU stop funding that terrible war —and the rest of the EU would have to follow suit if Germany pulls back— then the Jew-Zionist/Ukrainian-thug regime in Kiev will collapse for sure, and rather rapidly.

Shove Ursula von der Leyen onto her broomstick and kick her into orbit (or obit).

Devil’s alternative: if Burnham goes to the people this year, Labour will lose, probably, 100-150 MPs, maybe more, but if he waits until 2029, barring some very unlikely uptick, Labour might lose 200, or even more.

[“Look at Dan Hodges and former columnist David Aaronovitch. They want you to think that even discussing demographic change in Britain’s schools is “racist”. They are completely out of touch. Imagine going to Japan and saying the native Japanese will soon be a minority but if you talk about it you’re racist. We are allowed to discuss what is happening in our own country, in our home. And I for one will never stop speaking up for the silent majority. That might be why so many people read our newsletter. Because they want the truth. They can see much of the commentariat is a joke.”]

For me, it is, as already said, ludicrous that some uneducated, uncultured, dishonest, freeloading “chavscum” woman should even be an MP, let alone in Cabinet. Still, that’s where we are now, ruled over by absolute trash.

The woman is basically a brainless bimbo.

Similar in uselessness. A Nigerian woman who is only here because her parents deliberately had her born here so that, under the law as it was in 1981, she would later have the “right” to have a British passport.

Both Lab and Con are treacherous and pointless, as well as both being puppets of (((the usual suspects))).

Late music

[painting by Volegov]

Diary Blog, 11 July 2023, with thoughts around the “BBC presenter” storm in a teacup

Morning music

[Parcellier, The Orangerie]

Battles past

Thought for the Day

I see that the “BBC presenter” story is still rolling. A couple of things strike me about the story and also about the reaction to it.

Firstly, the sheer hysteria. It seems that the girl involved was 17 at the time, assuming that there is any substance to the story. It is one of the oddities of the English law at present (as I understand it— I admit to being not very au fait with it now, having not practised at the Bar since 2008) that the unnamed BBC presenter could actually have had full sexual relations with the girl (or any girl of 17, or indeed 16) without being in peril of the law, yet if he paid for nude photographs of her (even though she may have taken them herself, and willingly) he might actually be at risk of imprisonment: see https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/jul/09/bbc-presenter-accused-of-paying-teenager-for-photos-could-face-jail-term-if-guilty.

To my mind, this makes a mockery of the law. The “photographs” law should surely be in line with the law on sexual relations, and so the age reduced to 16 years.

I am unsure about whether a “photographs” law of that kind was or is necessary at all, or if it is, whether the relevant age should be 16 or lower, as with some provisions of, eg, the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 and the Sexual Offences Act 1956.

The Protection of Children Act 1978, the present “photographs” law, does not (as far as I know) specify an age, but refers only to “children“.

This was never the kind of law I did when at the Bar, so I may be out of my depth on the detail here but, to my mind, that 1978 “photographs” law (which I have never read in full) seems to be on the face of it yet another badly-drafted law of the past half-century. There are several others, including the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 and the Communications Act 2003, s. 127. Both of those have been superseded or are about to be superseded by newer laws.

I find it strange that the 1978 “photographs” law was thought to be necessary at all. It was brought in 20 years before the Internet was widely available for public use and, after all, photography itself has been around for about 200 years if you include its earlier modern manifestations such as the daguerrotype. Photographs as such have certainly existed since the 1860s, yet only in 1978 did Parliament consider that such a penal law was desirable, or at all necessary. Very odd.

Leaving all that aside, there seems to be a strange dissonance now— UK and general Western society almost eliminating real childhood and/or childhood “innocence”, and yet going mad if someone, especially anyone famous (such as George Osborne), has sexual relations, even if completely lawfully (in Osborne’s case, that is disputed), with a teenage girl of 16 or 17, or if such a person (as alleged of the unnamed BBC presenter) pays a girl of 16 or 17 for some risque photographs.

Well, there it is. To my mind, this “BBC presenter” story is a bit of a storm in a teacup anyway, looking at the challenges our country and society face at present. There are bigger issues.

The other aspect which I find striking about the “BBC presenter” story is that the unnamed defaulter has such a high level of income that he can, and apparently is willing to, pay out £35,000 for photographs of some girl.

The BBC gets almost all of its money from the outdated tax misleadingly called a “licence fee”. Radio licences, dog licences etc have passed into history, but the BBC licence fee marches on. Not only that, but enforced by criminal sanction. There are many people (mostly women) actually in prison because of having not had a TV licence, and then unable or unwilling to comply with the order of a court: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/tv-licence-fee-women-convictions-b1763192.html.

Out of the huge revenues thus raised, the BBC pays its staff well, often very well, and in some cases far too well. Gary Lineker, that loudmouth ignoramus, is paid a million a year to shoot the breeze about football. Alan Shearer, another ex-footballer, gets about half a million. Zoe Ball apparently gets about a million. A number are getting around £400,000. Looking at them, most are, frankly, overpaid.

Why should the public subsidize what is increasingly, “Soviet” TV and radio output, largely unwatchable and unlistenable?

My final thought about this nonsense is that George Osborne must be loving it. The notorious email about his own peccadilloes is now already all but forgotten. I suppose, though, that despite his former, though fairly brief, political prominence, Osborne is now yesterday’s news…just not very interesting to most people.

[Update, 16 July 2026: well, of course it turned out that the teenage girl was in fact a teenage boy, that the BBC presenter was newsreader Huw Edwards, and that he (whom the BBC paid nearly £500,000 a year) had paid the boy for indecent photos. He was tried, convicted (pleaded guilty) and given a mild and non-custodial penalty: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huw_Edwards]

From the newspapers

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/jul/11/900000-older-people-ae-lack-of-nhs-care-at-home

It’s deeply worrying that many older people are ending up in hospital due to lack of the right sort of services in the community. No one wants to be in hospital but for older people all too often it can lead to an avoidable deterioration in their health,” said Caroline Abrahams, Age UK’s charity director.

Prof Adam Gordon, the president of the British Geriatrics Society, said the report “makes grim reading [and] rightly identifies that older people are currently being let down by NHS and social care services”.”

[The Guardian]

This has been a scandal (and a massive waste of money) for years, certainly since 2010 and probably long before. No care at home means more demand at hospitals. District nurses were once ubiquitous; now they seem hardly to exist at all. I was told by one, a decade ago, that she was fed up with NHS mismanagement, and so was emigrating to Australia, where she would also be paid far more.

As with so many areas of life in England, Government and Opposition talk a good game, but fail to deliver for the people.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12284583/Amnesty-handed-10-000-small-boats-migrants-reached-UK-past-four-months.html

Nearly 10,000 small-boat migrants who reached Britain in the past four months were last night handed an ‘amnesty’ from the Government’s tough new immigration measures.

[Daily Mail]

More treachery.

10,000 more deadbeats, criminals, potential terrorists, and/or useless millstones round the neck of the British people.

However bad and (at best) useless Starmer-Labour will be, this “Conservative” Party misgovernment really has failed on every metric. It has to go, and I hope that almost all of its MPs will be dumped by the voters. Then a new fight will begin, against the “Labour” version of the System…

Tweets seen

Migration invasion.

Terrible, particularly in France, the UK, Spain, but also in Germany, Sweden, Netherlands, Belgium and, oddly, Bulgaria.

Migration-invasion does not only mean small boats crossing the Channel, but also “legal” migration and, often forgotten, “invasion by births”.

Having encountered a couple of Dutch doctors, this does not at all surprise me…

Well, there it is. The Poles are sensible after all…

and “Labour”, under Starmer, Rachel Reeves, and Yvette Cooper, will be saying, in effect, “vote for us…we can make workhouses run more efficiently, and more fairly, and with full implementation of any anti-racist, anti-sexist, pro-LGBTQXYZ measures you can imagine“…

…yet System talking heads on TV and radio worry that British people now hate “their” MPs, and are always asking why…

Late tweets

I recommend tweeter @wayotworld.

2%, though? Surely that (((group))) is more like 0.5% of the population?

A horrible woman, and completely out of her depth when Prime Minister. I suspect part-Jewish. She strengthened the bad law of Communications Act 2003, s.127 by introducing a 3-year longstop limitation period in place of the formerly-existing 6-month one, which change has emboldened evil little cabals such as the “Campaign Against Antisemitism”, which use “lawfare” (abuse of our legal and justice systems) to repress British people.

If that is a genuine photograph, it is really telling.

Look at that old Jewess kowtowing.

Maybe, as with Biden, those telephones have reached the end of their normal-functioning life.

Unless NATO forces join in the war (as the Zelensky cabal wants), the Kiev regime has no prospect even of recovering Donetsk and Lugansk regions, let alone Crimea.

If NATO forces were to join in the war, directly, a major conflagration would start across Central and Eastern Europe, maybe even into Western Europe. It might then go nuclear.

One picture is worth a thousand words“…

Well, I myself have never been a mental patient, but here are a few interesting stories (some featuring “Dr. Dim”):

Late music