Tag Archives: Nymphenburg

Diary Blog, 19 April 2026

Morning music

[Grand Cascade, Schlosspark Nymphenburg; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nymphenburg_Palace#Park]

Tweets seen

Our animal friends.

Our animal friends.

Antonia Romeo. Hard-faced, careeerist, moneygrubbing, freeloading, staff-bullying bitch. Get her out.

[“The Mail on Sunday can reveal today that Keir Starmer’s team received a briefing from security sources in 2023 about Peter Mandelson that included:

  • The revelation his friendship with Epstein dated back to 2006
  • The pair were being monitored by Russian intelligence, who viewed their relationship as “close”
  • Soviet intelligence began targeting Mandelson as far back as the late 1980’s
  • British and EU intelligence officials were so concerned about his business links with Putin ally Oleg Deripaska they advised him to cut off links. Including ending his use of Deripaska’s private jet.”]

In my view, most Jews, with their —almost-always— dual (or even triple) loyalties, cannot be employed in government.

Farage himself triggered such speculation by allowing to join Reform a whole host of washed-up ex-Con politicians, some of them non-European, some of them guilty former expenses cheats.

For me, there is only one reason to hope that Reform UK does well, and that is to use it as a battering-ram to break down the existing rigged System-party scam by mortally-wounding both Lab and Con.

Major sources of infection: TV and radio. Press. Publishing. Schools and universities.

Who owns, controls, or strongly influences those areas of society? Three guesses…

Liz Kendall: Labour Friends of Israel member, and her own provenance uncertain.

Russia has no intention of invading the UK. What possible motive could it have?

Having said that, I should prefer this country to be invaded by Russians rather than the blacks, browns, and other backward hordes currently invading it (both “legal” and “illegal” migrant-invaders).

See also:

The amount of vegetables that can be grown on a small patch, say 20 x 20 feet (400 square feet, which is only about 1% of an acre) is incredible. Ask Google AI.

Some types of food crop need virtually no skill or effort to grow; examples include broccoli, tomato, peppers, cucumber, courgettes.

Obviously, horticultural skill, husbandry effort, varieties planted, and installed glasshouses (which may be basic or may have automated irrigation, temperature control, sun control etc) make a big difference to volume grown but, in principle, much can be grown without great expense, knowledge, or effort.

For example, in the South of England, in the open, a plot 20 x 20 feet might result in an annual broccoli crop of between 100 and 400 pounds weight.

We in the UK, and elsewhere, are looking at the possibility of social and economic breakdown in the coming decades. Anyone with at least some land, even if only a suburban garden, should be looking at ways to supplement external food supplies and/or stored canned food with home-produced fruit and vegetables.

Ah, threatened them with injunctions…at first, I thought it might be about how he maybe threatened to run them over with his mobility scooter…

For a great deal more about the egregious “Mark Lewis Lawyer”, use the search box on the blog.

Deport? No. Put them up against a wall. Easier, cheaper, and much more of a deterrent.

[“Brilliant just recieved a letter from my landlord putting the rent up another £520 a year thats my holiday gone. I know people who go to work aren’t entitled to holidays or to live on their own or to have the heating on. What wont we be entitled to next year? At what point does this end? I know families eating from foodbanks to service the rent. I actually feel sick because I know next year when the rent goes up again I wont have much more to cut back on. I’m getting closer to the HMO. This is why people aren’t saving towards pensions.“]

If you want to know why people are desperately casting around for a political alternative to the LibLabCon System parties, the above is at least part of the reason. There is no one obvious alternative to Lab/Con, but a number of contending parties are getting traction: Reform UK, Green Party, Restore Britain are the best-known.

At some point, landlord parasitism has to be reined-in.

…and without white populations, the black “states” of Africa and the Caribbean etc will return to barbarism. In fact that is already happening, but is partly-disguised by the existence of (dwindling) white European minorities in countries such as South Africa, Zimbabwe (former Rhodesia) and elsewhere, by the presence also of foireign aid projects, also by the work of NGOs helping with both expertise and money, and further by the presence of “Western” (European, North American etc) capitalist enterprises running oilfields, mines, banks, manufacturing plants etc.

Quite.

I propose the following: that anyone should have the right to go to university, so long as the university itself is willing to accept that applicant, but that only the top 10% of applicants (however determined, and there would be a debate to be had about how to define the “top 10%“) should get grants for full tuition costs, and full (as decided) subsistence costs.

The next layer, say 30% of applicants, would have their tuition paid but not their living costs, and they would have to take out student loans for that, which loans would have to be repaid in the future, no matter what.

The remaining 60% of applicants would also have to take out student loans, but for both tuition and subsistence.

Harsh, yes, but I think necessary.

One could imagine also that students willing to undertake studies particularly favoured by the State might get bonus amounts, if approved as suitable, just as Army, Navy, Marine, and Air Force scholarships are presently paid to suitable students at UK universities, which students undertake to serve as officers for a few years after graduation.

Why not extend that to a range of studies directly useful to the State or society generally?

In fact, persons willing to train vocationally but not at university, in fields useful to the State or society, people such as nurses, plumbers, bricklayers etc, should also be able to get grants.

Rather different to the picture usually painted by the Jews, “antifascists” etc…

I myself have been called, a few times in the past, though not very often, on Twitter and elsewhere, “a knuckledragger” (only once, I think), “stupid“, “idiot“, “needing education” etc, despite my having been tested (1980s, admittedly) at IQ 156.

As a matter of fact, correspondence I have seen suggests that the Jew-Zionist cabals at least (i.e. not the “antifascist” loonies) paint a rather different picture of me when they have complained to “the authorities” about me. After all, if your opponent is a stupid or silly fellow, why is he such an alleged danger to society?

Imagine that: as late as 1941, there were still 70,000 Jews living freely in, not even the Reich as a whole, but just in Berlin itself! After 2 years of war, and after 8 years of National Socialist government!

Again, the picture of National Socialist Germany painted by the “approved” System historians and the Jew-Zionist element is seen to be largely untrue.

Stop importing a million blacks, browns and Chinese (etc) every year. Start getting rid of unwanted individuals and groups. Make rent-parasitism, and buy-to-let landlordism etc illegal.

No matter how many houses you build, the influx of migrant-invaders (and breeding by them and those already embedded here) will outstrip the supply.

The council-house sell-offs of the 1980s/1990s were disastrous for society. The present housing crisis was partly caused by that, partly by the subsequent and partly consequent buy-to-let explosion, and partly by reason of the migration invasion.

A good idea. In Downing Street itself, not in Whitehall.

If the Suez Canal is blocked, as well as the Strait of Hormuz, the economic consequences for Europe especially will be huge.

Late music

[painting by Volegov]

Diary Blog, 13 July 2024, with some thoughts about Churchill and the post-WW2 division of Europe etc, and about Reform UK

Morning music

Saturday quiz

Well, 7/10 this week, thus beating political journalist John Rentoul, who scored 5/10. I did not know the answers to questions 3, 7, and 10, though I was at least in the right area re. question 7.

Tweets seen

That idea, that the online pseudo-political “grifters” (“Jack Monroe”, “Supertanskiii”, “Man Behaving Dadly”, Julia Grace Patterson etc) will have to nuance their begging appeals now that the hated “Tories” have switched places with the supposedly better but actually quite similar (in policy terms) Starmer-Labour, had occurred to me.

I doubt that the online fraudsters need to worry too much, though. Their target audience is almost begging to be cheated, and will accept as true almost any variation in the “facts” put forward. You only have to look at the lies of “Jack Monroe” over the years. Stunningly unbelievable. Like something from a book of fairy stories. Yet the “useful idiots” believe…and continue to send money to her.

There is a belief around that “mainstream” political parties must aim to be in the non-existent or notional “centre”.

Regular readers of the blog will know that I effectively never use the descriptors “right”, “left”, “centre” etc in that way.

What matters is policy, and what matters to the people is the overall effect of policy on their lives. The Conservative Party failed the people in terms of how their confused policy offering actually affected or changed, or failed to change, the lives and lifestyles of the people. Labour is about to follow suit, in my opinion.

A frequently-encountered problem in our society of pervasive b******t…

…said well-known political journalist John Rentoul in...2014. Oh…

That aged well…

Sunak is already forgotten. It is as if the little Indian money-juggler departed the stage (pursued by a bear?) years ago, rather than nine days ago.

Talking point

Not that Churchill himself wanted to finish off the British Empire. He wanted, in an ideal world, to destroy National Socialist Germany and, at the same time, the Soviet Union.

Churchill’s strategic ineptitude (seen in numerous examples throughout his career) led not only to the destruction of the German Reich, followed by the division of mainland Europe into a Stalinist sector in the East, and a basically American, or notionally Anglo-American, sector in the West, but also to the destruction of all the European empires, and thus their generally civilizing influence over Asia, Africa (including North Africa) etc

The same basic division in Europe (though into 4 national sectors) was carried out in much of Germany and Austria for several years after WW2, with the capital cities (Berlin and Vienna) likewise divided.

Vienna was divided until 1955, Berlin until 1989, and France was, as a notional Western ally, given one sector despite having been defeated in 1940, partly occupied the same year, and fully-occupied in November 1942 (and having not participated in the defeat of the German Reich).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_military_administration_in_occupied_France_during_World_War_II

The end of WW2 led directly to the collapse of European rule across the world. The colonies of Britain, France, Belgium, Spain, the Netherlands etc were decolonized, some almost immediately, some much later. Thus began the environmental degradation and loss of wildlife across Asia, Africa, the Pacific etc, which situation continues even today, as do the wars, civil wars, corruptions and tyrannies of the formerly colonial territories.

Churchill, an educated and erudite man who was also completely wrong in his political judgment(s) was, so to speak, “the wrong man at the wrong time”, though the accepted System/msm narrative says the opposite, of course.

As for Britain itself after WW2, I recommend the books of the very underrated Correlli Barnett: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlli_Barnett.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlli_Barnett#Writings

As Barnett points out in one or two of those books, after WW2 Britain would have been able to do one of three things well, possibly even two of those things: maintain its status as a great power; regenerate its economy; create a Welfare State. Britain tried to accomplish all three, but was unable to do so satisfactorily. Britain had been beggared by its war against the German Reich.

These three aims or tasks (or problems) are still with us, in some or another form, today.

Britain today is the “also ran” in respect of its military power, its society (Welfare State, NHS, State education etc), and economy.

As far as Barnett is concerned, I should say that he was right far more often than he was wrong.

Incidentally, Barnett was probably denied a knighthood, a life peerage, and other official honours (he did get a CBE) by reason of his having spoken, or strongly implied, the unsayable— that Britain should never have declared war on the German Reich or, having declared war in September 1939, should have concluded an armistice sometime after Dunkirk, in mid to late 1940, before too much hurt and damage had been done in western and central Europe.

Reform UK

Reform UK’s vote suffers from being wide, indeed nationwide (though not so strong in Scotland), but shallow. 14.29% across the board could easily have meant zero seats anywhere, rather than the 5 Reform actually captured.

The LibDem vote, only 12.22% nationally, was nonetheless concentrated here and there. Result— 72 MPs.

Reform UK, to me, seems to be in a fairly good position to concentrate some of its overall support in certain parts of the country, and certain constituencies, just like the LibDems. For Reform, that would be, primarily or firstly, in the East of England and the East Midlands: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_Kingdom_general_election#Full_results; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_Kingdom_general_election#By_nation_and_region.

In the East of England, Reform UK scored 17.5% of the vote; in the East Midlands, 18.9%.

Indeed, though Reform won no GE 2024 seats in the West Midlands or North-East England, its vote was still high— 18.1% in the former, and 19.9% in the latter (less than half a point behind the Conservative Party). Reform was also not very far behind the Conservative Party in the West Midlands.

Reform UK came second in 98 constituencies, of which 89 were won or held by Labour.

It is not impossible to surmise that, if the Conservative Party vote were to collapse further in those 98 seats, Reform UK might capture some, many, or even all of them.

That would be even more likely, arguende, if Starmer-Labour in government disappoints the mass of the people, as I believe it will.

Late tweets seen

I am glad that I am not alone in having noticed the sickening sycophancy of the “occupied” UK msm towards Starmer-Labour (though would anyway be unconcerned were I the only one).

Today, on Sky News, I caught literally seconds of the end of a piece by some sports journalist woman. Her take was that, with “England” in the final game of some football contest, and a new Labour (New Labour?) government in power, it feels (she claimed) like the dawning of a new era. I believe that was the brainless and derivative way in which she put it.

Of course, Starmer-Labour will probably be in power until 2029, so the msm drones naturally want to curry favour, but I think that the said sycophancy goes beyond even that. I think that many in the msm seriously believe that Starmer-Labour is wonderful and will bring about some minor “golden age”.

I see no real connected thinking in the msm about what happens when the UK is importing literally a million invaders every single year, about what happens when a Labour government is harder on workers, the unemployed, the sick, the disabled than has been the past 14 years of “Conservative” government (etc).

What happens when the lights go out? What happens when lawlessness finally overwhelms a fairly civilized court and legal system which evolved over long periods but which is now already swamped?

Also, with a deadhead like Lammy as Foreign Secretary, what happens to Britain’s already-tattered international standing?

What interests me is what will be happening 2025-2029 under the surface of the Labour Party pseudo-landslide Commons majority.

Who can forget Ed Miliband at Copenhagen in 2005, bleating outside the UN conference (so badly-organized that he was not allowed in at first) about the fake “3/5/7/whatever years to save the world” narrative? I also recall that little monkey, who was the President of the Maldives, jumping up and down and clapping once he realized that his country might receive millions in “climate aid” in case the Maldives sank below the waves (nearly 20 years later, though, it is still there).

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maldives#Sea_level_rise]

Late music

[painting by Victor Ostrovsky]