Morning music
Tweets seen
“They” are very brave when targeting children or other unarmed civilians, but they still have the race-memory of a time, about 80-90 years ago, when they themselves (at least, their ancestors) scurried in fear away from soldiers wearing a different uniform…
A horrible, evil little sprite.
One day, the Tel Aviv area may see similar scenes. “What goes around comes around“.
Translates to about 392 Reform MPs, so a substantial overall majority. Lab 99, LibDems 64, SNP 33, Cons 30 (etc).
I have seen a few tweets noting that, in another recent opinion poll, Reform’s share dipped to about 28% after its recent annual conference, but those tweets are mistaken insofar as they say that the lower Reform UK level therefore shows increased support for Labour or Con. I think not. People are not intending to vote Reform to get a Farage/Reform government; they are intending to vote Reform in order to stamp on and kick Lab and Con.
Look at 2024. Voters voted Labour (or abstained) in order to kick out the Cons and their “great non-white hope”, the little Indian money-juggler, Sunak. Labour thus gained an unmerited large Commons majority even though, out of every 20 eligible voters, a plurality, 8 out of the 20, did not even vote; 4 out of every 20 voted Labour; 3 out of every 20 voted Con; 2-3 out of 20 voted Reform; another 2-3 voted LibDem, and 1 out of 20 voted Green.
The point is that, having binned the fake Conservatives, the voters now want to bin fake Labour. The result of that will be that Reform benefits by default, as Labour did in 2024. The wish of the people, though, is not Reform government, as such. They accept, whether consciously or not, that that will be the inevitable result of binning both main System parties, but their wish is just to have an effective government, and a society which puts Britain and British people first.
It is hard to say what the “ceiling” of Reform, in percentage terms, may be. The opinion polls have had Reform as high as 35%, so far. That may stretch to 40% or higher; we do not know. I certainly think it doubtful that either Con or Lab will get to 35% before the next general election. Lab may or may not get to 30% (I doubt it); the Cons are unlikely to go higher than 25%, or even 20%.
As often said, my hope is that Reform beats Con and Lab, but then fails in government, leaving the field wide open for the advance of a social-national movement that, at present, does not exist in a formal sense.
…and the police must stop acting as puppets or good little dogs for the Jew-Zionist/Israel lobby (especially the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism” or “CAA”).
No “financial support” or facilitation should be going to Israel anyway.
Well, if so, then also ban the main Jew-Zionist troublemaking orgs— “CAA”, “CST”, “UKLFI” (etc). After all, “equality is equity“…
Well, we know that Mandelson is uninterested in young (or any) women, so what is the connection? It must be the Jewish and Israeli connection. Mandelson is a Jew. Epstein was a Jew (Epstein now, of course, having “gone up the chimney”, but Mandelson not yet).
Mandelson is yet another member of Labour Friends of Israel, along with Starmer-stein and almost all of his Cabinet.
There is a clear Jewish, Zionist or pro-Zionist, and Israeli Intelligence (MOSSAD, Aman etc) aspect to the whole Epstein case. Look at the involvement of the half-Jew, Ghislaine “Maxwell”, whose horrible full-Jew father, “Robert Maxwell”, is believed to have been MOSSAD’s chief agent in Europe, until (very probably) assassinated on MOSSAD or Aman orders. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Intelligence_Directorate_(Israel).
Look at my very detailed, and frequently updated, examination of all such matters around Epstein:
Hodges thinks Starmer-stein’s position is hard to understand. Not when you factor-in Starmer’s slavish pro-Israel position, which is egregious even compared to that of Sunak, Truss, “Boris”-idiot, May, and Cameron-Levita.
Look at Starmer’s Cabinet, at his elevations to the Lords etc. Starmer may actually be a conscious and willing agent, or at least an “agent of influence”, of the Israeli state.
Mandelson. Just another lying and manipulating Jew-Zionist, who has wormed his way into the world of Westminster politics over the past 30-40 years.
Like previous no-good prime ministers, Starmer was the preferred candidate of the Israel lobby. That lobby trashed poor old Corbyn, and (via a Labour Friends of Israel, and pro-Zionist msm, conspiracy) installed Starmer and his Labour Friends of Israel ministers.
Speaking for myself (and as can be verified by my blog posts going back several years), I always saw Starmer as “dull as ditchwater“; also, having been at the Bar myself, I knew that quite mediocre people often get quite high positions in English law, in Starmer’s case as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). I therefore thought, until about 3-4 years ago, that Starmer, though dull and also in the pocket of the Israel lobby, would —as a Prime Minister of this country— be at least administratively competent. I was therefore surprised, circa 2022, to see that, in fact, Starmer was so incompetent that I described him that year as “utterly clueless“.
I think, though should not say so, that I was right…
Look at stupid Starmer-stein’s face as the scarcely rhetorical question is asked. He looks more affronted than the Jew from Israel.
In a single day…(and it is happening every single day).
I am not “anti-Polish”, not by any means, and travelled there several times in the late 1980s, but I struggle to understand why the current Polish authorities seem determined to have their country flattened again, and for no good reason.
I suppose that is what happens when parliaments are full of corrupt self-seekers, and do not reflect the will of the people.
Salus populi suprema lex esto: the welfare of the people is the highest law [Cicero].
Late music
Update, 14 September 2025
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/13/jeffrey-epstein-emails-wealth
“Jeffrey Epstein was a very wealthy man, but exactly how wealthy and where that money came from remains shrouded in mystery.
Newly unearthed emails last week shone light on Epstein’s role as freelance client development officer, acting as a channel between political figures and business titans, greasing up the former with lifestyles they could not afford and the latter with avenues of political influence.
…the questions about the source of Epstein’s wealth have never been fully resolved. He was worth nearly $600m at his death, thanks mostly to two wealthy billionaire clients – Victoria’s Secret founder Les Wexner and, later, Apollo Global Management co-founder Leon Black – as well as Johnson & Johnson heiress Elizabeth “Libet” Johnson, sister of former US ambassador to the UK Woody Johnson.
Between his collection of lavish homes in New York, Palm Beach and Paris, two private Caribbean islands, two jets and helicopter, Epstein held nearly $380m in cash and investments, according to his estate.
That wealth arrived suddenly. According to associates, until the end of the 90s, Epstein was living in a two-bedroom apartment on Manhattan’s Upper East Side close to the river. It was only when Maxwell arrived from London that his lifestyle was dramatically elevated.
Epstein moved to a townhouse on 68th Street and later to a 28,000-sq-ft mansion on 71st Street, later transferred to him by Wexner in 2011.
Steven Hoffenberg, a former business partner of Epstein convicted of running a Ponzi scheme, claimed that Maxwell’s father, disgraced press baron Robert Maxwell, introduced his daughter to Epstein in the late 1980s.“
[Guardian]
Ian Robert Millard 