Apart from which, I have seen many tweets making the very good point that the recent assassination of an MP has made not only headlines but almost all the UK news for days, and the police and MI5 have been running round in circles every bit as much as the msm.
On the other hand, as those same tweets point out, “ordinary people” (not MPs) are now stabbed in numerous incidents every day, most are killed (not all, admittedly) by blacks and browns, and the news stays on the crime pages of the newspapers, or in local newspapers. It rarely gets onto TV news.
The self-designated “elite” maskless, while the serving staff and bodyguard staff are masked. There have been many recent clips and films exposing the double-standard. This is not a small or petty point. It goes to the heart of the facemask nonsense and, indeed, the whole “panicdemic”. Social control using both law and applied psychology on a mass scale.
So the Royal Navy, the inheritor of the legends of Drake, Raleigh, Nelson, Captain Cook, Trafalgar, Jutland, the River Plate, the Bismarck, the Battle of the Atlantic etc, now has to turn to Israel to train its people?! Shameful…
I see that a Jewish scribbler who writes for, inter alia, the Daily Mail, seems to be enthusiastic about the Jewish thugs and other criminals who were part of the “62 Group”, formed in 1962 to attack the meetings of, but not exclusively, Colin Jordan. They also attacked social-national people caught alone in the streets etc.
The “62 Group” was modelled on the equally-thuggish “43 Group” of the mid-1940s.
It is, as bank managers say, “disappointing” to see the BBC make a drama series, Ridley Road, glorifying such criminals; disappointing but not surprising, as infested as the BBC now is.
I have not yet seen the TV drama in question, but I imagine that it is very cardboard cut-out, with the Jews all wonderful, brave, daring etc, and the social-national people largely unpleasant (and, of course, “wrong”) etc…
Here are the tweets I saw today:
[late update: the original tweet is now invisible, because the Jewish journalist (Nicole Lampert) referred to above has locked her Twitter account, probably only temporarily]
The reply is from one Stephen Applebaum (who also sometimes trolls on Twitter under the name “@rattus2384”, and who is a fervent supporter/activist for the tiny but well-funded “Campaign Against Antisemitism” or “CAA”). His reply seems to imply, at least, an attitude impressed by the (alleged) fact (I did not know it) that the once-famous hairdresser Vidal Sassoon used knives as part of his “activity” with the “43 Group”. Very topical, with criminals stabbing people ranging from MPs to “ordinary citizens” in 2021 Britain. The Wikipedia entry for Sassoon glosses over that aspect: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vidal_Sassoon.
Not everyone, though, supports vigilantes, as at least one further reply to those tweets indicates.
The “62 Group” also included such asGerry Gable, a half-Jew who, with others, burgled the home of historian David Irving [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Irving] in 1963, and who eventually (in the late 1970s or 1980s) married (small world) a much younger half-Jewish woman, Sonia [nee Hochfelder], whom I actually met a few times in 1976, when she attended a few meetings of the League of St. George. She even had a drink with me once.
A couple of cautionary points: firstly, the Wikipedia piece about David Irving is plainly very (((biased))). Sadly, Wikipedia is rather “infested” in some parts of its output.
Secondly, re. Gerry Gable, Sonia Gable/Hochfelder and their Jewish “antifascist” Searchlight magazine (which featured me a couple of times in the 1970s, and again in 1993, I seem to recall), a Google search turns up all sorts of allegations about them which may or may not be accurate.
The 1993 mention of me in Searchlight came after I wrote a short letter to the Independent newspaper, criticizing the then-quite-new “globalism” as it affected the post-Soviet European space from the Atlantic to the Urals. I was looking for it recently via Google, now that it is clear that I have been proven right.
Those mentioned above are now either dead or aged. Sassoon died in 2012, Gable is 84, and David Irving is 83. I think that Sonia Hochfelder was about a year or two older than me, which would make her 66-68 now.
As for Colin Jordan [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Jordan], I occasionally corresponded with him in, I think, 1975 or 1976 (I think the former). He (unsurprisingly!) thought little of my proposal that he subordinate his people and resources to me (aged 18/19 at the time)… His letters came from some farmstead in Yorkshire.
Looking now at Jordan’s Wikipedia entry, I see that he only died in 2009, a fact hitherto unknown to me. I had assumed that he had died many years before, maybe in the 1980s. His longevity, like that of Glazunov, surprises, despite 85 not being terribly ancient these days. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Glazunov#Death.
Still, the ripples of those 1960s and 1970s days are still with us today. The “62 Group” may have passed into —and become a footnote to— history, but one of its Jewish toughs, Gerald Ronson [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Ronson], aged about 23 in 1962, is now (via a family trust https://ronsonfoundation.org/cst/) one of the main bankrollers for the “Community Security Trust” or “CST”, the Jewish-Zionist strongarm and snooping org, which has 90+ full-time employees and had, in 2020, an income of over £11 million: https://cst.org.uk/about-cst.
When American society finally collapses (and I think that that day will be much much sooner than 99.99% of other people think…), it will not be because of Jews, or blacks, or browns, or LGBTXYZ people, or finance-capitalist exploitation, or “woke” pseudo-socialism. It will be because of a cocktail of all of that.
Some people might think, “if I had a Luger, I might reach for it, if it would save the UK from going the way of the USA.” Sadly, a Luger (or a Browning, or a Sig-Sauer, or a Glock) will not help in this situation…you cannot fight a culture war with, primarily, weapons designed for an old-style or other real (shooting) war. More subtle —and yet wider— methods are required.
More about the Jewish-Zionist recapture of the Labour Party
I never thought much of Jeremy Corbyn, that unoriginal, poorly-educated, not particularly intelligent survival of 1970s London “socialist” meets “identity” politics. Corbyn, with his ludicrous “Cable Street”, “!Non Pasaran”, 1930s Popular Front-ism, his adulation of Fidel and Che (and, latterly, Chavez/Maduro).
Having said that, Corbyn, whose actual election as Labour leader was nothing short of miraculous, was recognizably British and, as I said in my blog, a type reminiscent of Labour people one met from time to time in the 1970s: the “Lenin” cap, the folded copy of, as it might be, Morning Star, Tribune, or Militant. The sort of fellow likely to be encountered at Collet’s London Bookshop in Charing Cross Road (a haunt of 1970s politicos of various sorts, and run by a little Jew).
Such people as Corbyn might also, I think, be encountered (though not by me) at local Labour or trade union meetings, steam fairs, heritage railways, the Durham Miners’ Gala, or the Tolpuddle Martyrs weekend.
I disagreed with much of Corbyn’s ideology, and with most of his (outdated and sometimes anti-British) policies. Having said that, he was decently anti-Zionist, though sadly gave lip-service to Zionist underpinnings such as the “holocaust” farrago and “anti-racism”, thus playing into the hands of the Jewish Zionist lobby, which itself is as “racist” as it gets, at root.
Zionism after all is basically a Jewish version of the Germanic “Blut und Boden” plus settler-colonialism (not that I oppose that…if done by real Europeans, though).
From the moment the Corbyn became Labour leader, there was a conspiracy launched against him. This was basically a Jewish/Zionist conspiracy, though making use of non-Jews (Chuka Umunna, Joan Ryan, Mary Creagh etc) and even the odd apostate Jew MP.
That conspiracy was funded by extremely wealthy Jew businessmen, and was able to rent quietly-situated houses in the country where secret meetings took place, and to utilize slush funds sourced directly from Israel.
Many will recall a (very) few TV programmes (very rarely seen in the msm) about the sheer scope of the Israeli/Jewish/Zionist lobby in the UK:
Sometimes that “lobby”, acting partly via Labour Friends of Israel and Conservative Friends of Israel, directs its attention to UK Middle East policy; sometimes, however, the interference is even more blatant, and extends to getting rid of MPs not willing to toe the Israel/Jewish lobby line.
Here below, for example, we see corrupt freeloader and expenses cheat, former “Labour” MP Joan Ryan, discussing a one million pound Israeli slush fund with one Shai Masot, an Israeli political intelligence officer (and reserve naval commander):
…and below, we see Israeli agent (of some kind) Maria Strizzolo (Italian name but, well, who knows?), and who, despite being a civil servant, talks about helping the Israelis to “take down” some British MPs:
I like the bit about the Israeli view of “Boris”, i.e. “...he is good, solid on Israel…you know he is an idiot...”. Yes, in fact, I did know that…
More on the above:
“Boris”, in following days, shrugged off and laughed about the above, even about the accurate Israeli assessment of himself (“an idiot“). What else could that sleazy part-Jew puppet do?
Reverting to the Labour Party and Corbyn, the conspiracy continued for about 3 years. A few msm stories over recent years:
Of course, the msm stories never mentioned “Jews” or “Jewish” or “Israel”…it was all about how “moderates” wanted to oust “extremist” Corbyn, though the idea that Corbyn was “anti-Semitic” became a drumming tom-tom over time.
The first ploy was to hold a leadership election to remove Corbyn. That misfired when most ordinary Labour members voted Corbyn rather than for the little Welsh windbag who opposed him.
The 2017 General Election, though superficially poor for Labour, was no worse, in percentage terms, than had occurred under Miliband and Brown.
The (((lobby))) then increased pressure on Corbyn himself, trying to pressure him to resign. That too failed, because Corbyn’s strong suit is that he has the hide of a rhinoceros.
Then came the 2019 General Election, at which Labour crashed, and the msm crowed about how “Boris” had won by a “landslide“. In seats, true, an 80-seat majority. FPTP voting did its work.
In terms of percentages, though, the Conservative Party garnered 43.6% of the popular vote, only 1.2 points higher than the 42.4% of 2017.
Other factors existed, but one stands out— the daily drip-drip of msm and (less important) social media poison about “Corbyn the anti-Semite”, “Corbyn the friend of terrorists”, “Corbyn the extremist” etc. BBC, Sky, the newspapers….and guess “what sort of people” are often the political editors and scribblers? That’s right… Zionist Jews.
Just off the top of my head, I can think of several organizations of mainstream media where the political editor(s) are Jewish: Sky News, LBC, various newspapers. No doubt other TV stations, radio stations and social media platforms are the same.
All that crushed both Corbyn and Labour. Don’t take my word for it, take it from the horse’s mouth:
Now? Corbyn has been replaced by Keir Starmer, a dull fellow but, significantly, one married to a Jewish woman, and their children are being brought up as if fully Jewish.
Corbyn has been suspended from the Labour Party, and the new Keir Starmer Shadow Cabinet is packed with Labour Friends of Israel members.
The Zionist lobby likes to have both main System parties “under control”. Corbyn’s leadership meant that one escaped, for a while. Now the stray sheep has been herded back into the pen. Both System parties are controlled, certainly strongly influenced, by the (((same or similar))) cabals.
More? Look at the kind of evil creatures involved (a long series of tweets but worth seeing):
Ruth Smeeth, half-Jewish, partly-descended from London gangsters, was not only the head of communications at the Israel-lobby org BICOM [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Britain_Israel_Communications_and_Research_Centre] but, before being pushed into a quite-safe Labour seat, was revealed by Wikileaks as having been effectively a spy for the US Embassy in London. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Smeeth (the bit about the US Embassy is not there). She is also tied up with the mainly Jewish “antifascist” org misnamed “Hope not Hate”. She lost her seat as MP to a Conservative candidate in 2019, but her main job was done…
Ironically, Ruth Smeeth, who favours clamping down on freedom of expression (if, inter alia, Jews or Israel are criticized), is now head of the NGO called “Index on Censorship”. Incredible.
The above EU/Brexit stuff is not, in itself, very relevant, not specifically.
That unpleasant-looking young Jew in the centre (name unknown to me) was the one sitting and smirking next to expenses cheat and Israel-puppet MP, Joan Ryan, when Israeli political intelligence operative Shai Masot explained that a million pounds had been approved for use as a slush fund at Westminster.
A late thought: when Starmer is en famille, and having one of those specifically Jewish evenings that they have on (I think) Fridays, or on Jewish religious holidays, does he wear one of those little skullcaps? As they say on Twitter (from which I have been barred since 2018), “genuine question”. I have no idea whether the headgear is de rigueur or not.
Late afternoon music
The tweets below made me laugh:
Ha ha! At the English Bar, it has always been said that, in the examination or cross-examination of a witness, never ask a question to which you do not know the answer.
The first tweeter, a scribbler who describes herself as “zionist“, and who has (supposedly) nearly 40,000 Twitter “followers”, asks the question. She gets just over a thousand retweets from her “followers” (and/or stray Twitter readers).
That may or may not mean that 39,000 of her “followers” either disagree with her, or cannot be bothered to retweet, or that they think that she should have given an alternative option such as “like” for “No”, or even “history can be and should be examined and revised, because an asserted “fact”, or asserted “facts”, are not a religious article of faith but a matter for consideration of all or any evidence.”
Still, there are 65 million inhabitants in the UK, and only about a thousand agreed with the proposition. 1 out of every 65,000. Or to put it another way, only 1 out of every 40 of her own supposed Twitter “followers”.
As to the second tweeter, he/she does not seem to have considered that 39,000 out of 40,000 “followers” disagree, that even some Jews think that history is a moveable feast, revision necessary and even inevitable, and that people have the right to question such doubtful propaganda as comprise the “holocaust” farrago.
Ah. I see now that the first tweeter is in the USA, so the proportion either not agreeing with her, and/or not interested in her silly tweet, is many times even the above figures.
Good to see.
Parting shot: the Jewish woman who seems to want to restrict free speech on the fakeries and fraud around the Jew-Zionist “holocaust” farrago also claims to be in favour of freedom of expression! See below:
“Their” lack of self-awareness is always hard to believe.
That is correct in its sarcasm; Priti Patel is an idiot. Having said that, I am not against removing Internet anonymity. In fact, I am planning to discover the true details of a few of the worst trolls. Then we’ll see…
More from the new dystopian, multikulti, biosecurity police state in Australia.
So are the police now still “woodentops”, or just blockheads?
Well, this week I scored 7/10, beating political journalist John Rentoul, who managed only 2/10. I did not know the answers to questions 2, 6, and 8.
…or to put it another way, no System parties inspire much enthusiasm among voters.
Oh. I only knew of him as someone in favour of better animal welfare, and I myself support that…
Where are the new Ned Kellys?
Quite. The “average joe” may “know” that there was “a” Russian Revolution, but what he [thinks he] “knows”, he knows only because somewhere in his mind is a misunderstood or part-understood conflation of biased and simplistic school lessons, and a general milieu in film and other msm output of to the effect that “the Tsars and aristocracy, living in luxury, burdened the workers and peasants, who then overthrew them and supported Lenin and the Bolsheviks“.
Not that there was no grain of truth in that. All big lies (such as the “holocaust” farrago) have to have some basis in reality, however slight. Russia before (and after) “the Revolution” did have terrible social problems, exploitation etc, which before 1917 included absentee and rentier landlords, and a social system that paid little heed to the poor.
The devil is, of course, in the detail. Few (even those today professing to be “fully-automated luxury Communists”) seem to know that there were many shades of opinion in pre-1917 —and, for a while, in post-1917— Russia. Many parties. Many tendencies.
Few know that the “real” Russian Revolution, as such, was in February 1917 (March 1917 in the new calendar), and that that Revolution was itself overthrown in October (old calendar) 1917, by a coup d’etat or palace revolution planned by Lenin and the Bolsheviks, and carried out as a military operation; it was a putsch in one or two cities of a vast empire, not a popular uprising, as many now think, and as the Soviet system propagandized via the films of Eisenstein.
The original soundtrack (originally played in cinemas) is now replaced by the 1966 one written by Shostakovitch, which uses music of his tone poem October, and which forms also part of his 12th Symphony, The Year 1917:
Of course, even today, relatively few people realize that the second “Russian Revolution”, i.e. the Bolshevik coup d’etat in the Autumn of 1917, was basically Jewish. Almost all the leaders of the Bolsheviks were Jews, or (like Lenin) part-Jew. Even Churchill, though later himself totally in the pocket of the Jews, at the time (1917-1918) wrote articles in the Morning Post (at the time, the favoured newspaper of the UK aristocracy and wealthy) about it. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Morning_Post#Controversial_publications.
I was told, at second-hand, a story about Lenin in exile. I knew a lady, born 1926, whose father had been a Graf (Count), and an German aristocratic hereditary landowner in East Prussia, the area abutting the Baltic, and now split between Poland and Russia (Kaliningradskaya Oblast, the region around former Konigsberg [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%B6nigsberg].
The Graf was descended from an early master of the Teutonic Knights [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teutonic_Order] and his estate near Danzig [after 1945, Gdansk, and a “Polish” city] comprised over 20,000 hectares, or about 50,000 acres. The mother of the lady I knew came from Austria, where her family also held estates.
The father of the lady I knew was sympathetic to socialism when a student in Vienna or Munich, or Zurich (I forget now which of those I was told, I think Zurich). He was apparently acquainted with Lenin, who was in exile in that part of the world (he was certainly in both Zurich and Munich at the time).
Whichever city it was (as I say, I think Zurich, though possibly Vienna), Lenin was arrested, but was released on the intervention of said well-connected student and his diplomatic contacts.
“Irony of Fate”: the father of the lady I knew was shot in 1939 or 1940 by either the Red Army or NKVD, during the upheavals in the Baltic region (they were travelling at the time by car from Romania). The estate near Danzig was finally taken over by the forces of Sovietism in 1945, and became a hospital, then an agricultural college.
The lady I knew (who had been taken prisoner/hostage by the NKVD in 1939 and was confined in Siberia/Northern Kazakhastan for three years before escaping…a long story) was able to revisit her childhood home, now in Poland, in the mid-1990s. She stayed in Sopot [former Zoppot] in the hotel she remembered visiting in childhood: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Hotel,_Sopot].
A sentimental journey, and no doubt a bitter-sweet one.
Life goes on, even after the most enormous upheavals…
Jews get “restitution” of property (and/or other payments), property supposedly confiscated by Germans in the late 1930s, or early 1940s, but non-Jews get nothing in compensation for land or whatever taken by Soviet or other forces, despite having held that land for centuries (as contrasted with the recently-acquired monies or commercial properties etc allegedly taken from Jews in the interwar period).
Aim: to create a better, more evolved society;
Method: import millions of the racially and culturally backward.
Perhaps he woke up to the fact that few people are interested in his malicious and unpleasant tweets anyway; or maybe he just forgot to take his medicines today.
The only thing that gives me pause is that many such online nuisances… trolls, wastes of space, whatever… make a big noise about “giving up the Twitter account”, then slink back a while later. Many trolls have done that in recent years.
In fact Twitter is a waste of time now. Most of the interesting accounts (such as mine, if I say so myself) are gone, in my case because a pack of Jews conspired together to make (as they do) malicious complaint about my tweets. That was in 2018, at which time I had about 3,000 Twitter followers (equivalent to maybe 6,000 today, had the account remained), whereas I see that “Slatfascists” still only has 2,358, three and a half years later. Not that “followers” mean much. In fact, the real influence of Twitter (as I have blogged before) is very limited.
Still, “Slatfascists” (who may or may not have been “doxed” recently) still has the privilege of reading daily (or, as he no doubt describes it, “monitoring”) my blog. He has read me since I started blogging in 2016, and can still do that when he goes back down the rabbit-hole.
As a matter of fact, my guess is that “Slatfascists” will be back on Twitter before long, just like so many others. After all, what else interests him (apart from reading my blog, and rubbing his hands when someone like Alison Chabloz gets prosecuted)? Apparently, playing some absurd “space cadet” electronic game…
Still, Twitter will be at least marginally more pleasant for his absence (as long as it lasts).
[Late-night update: it seems that “Slatfascists”, or at least his Twitter account, has “gone up the chimney”. Good riddance, but it means that his above tweet cannot now be seen, because the account has been deleted, not merely locked. For those who did not read it earlier, the tweet said that “Slatfascists” was leaving Twitter temporarily or permanently because Twitter would not expel all the accounts he (daily) “reported”, who were, he alleged, all “Nazis”.
I always thought that “Slatfascists” had to be at least part-Jew. His obsessions, his behaviour etc…
Oh well…How many green bottles does that make, about to fall off the wall?].
[Update, a day later: as I predicted, “Slatfascists” was unable to stop trolling, and is already back online…unable to stick to his “resolution” even for 24 hours. A weak-minded little troll with nothing to say about society]
— Dave. Ha. I see daft Nazi Millard spaffed himself! (@SLATFascists) October 17, 2021
Sometimes I wonder what is the proportion of the mentally-afflicted in the UK population now; must be huge, and on Twitter (especially pro-“antifa” Twitter, they seem even more prevalent]
Late afternoon music
300. Meaning probably 500 or 1,000 overall. Even on the lowest likely figure, that is at least 100,000 a year (and on the highest, maybe as many as 400,000), just from those crossing the Channel in an armada of rubber boats. Yes, fewer in the winter months, but more in the summer (up to 2,000 a day; and this government of Jews, Pakistanis and Indians does nothing but talk. What a surprise…
A lesson taught, though in view of the fact that the aggressive black got up immediately at the end, arguably not enough of one.
Because many, especially in the Anglophone countries, are more interested in whether “their” “national” football, cricket, rugby, American football, tennis (etc) “heroes” (even if non-white) win some sport competition or other than whether there exists free speech, national progress, or anything else.
The multiple agendas being pushed become ever-more blatant, but merely tweeting and blogging will not actually defeat the evildoers.
“It’s almost as if the UK System regime is not really trying”…
The endless “lockdowns” are a way of disguising what is really happening, i.e. the shutdown of large parts of the Western world for other reasons. It has to do with the promotion of the Pacific Rim (especially China) and North America (regardless of surface hostility). It is also connected with the next 33-year cycle starting in 2022. NWO/ZOG.
In the same way, if the NHS and care system for the elderly is wound down and underfunded, the excuse is now “it’s because of Covid”. Of course it is…
As before, I am amazed at the sheer forbearance of the British public. None of those malicious bastards is getting hit, or stamped upon, or kicked, or simply run over.
In a sense, I am glad that the public are so well-behaved, but being so nice seems to be taken advantage of by the ridiculous “protesters”. I wonder how long before the “protesters” outstay their welcome?
What is that all about? Is it criminal, or somehow political?
Brave words, but I am afraid that I have, over decades, heard too many “brave” (boastful) words from Americans who are armed to the teeth but actually do nothing.
“Having further considered that the said Company of Jesus can no longer produce those abundant fruits, … in the present case, we are determining upon the fate of a society classed among the mendicant orders, both by its institute and by its privileges; after a mature deliberation, we do, out of our certain knowledge, and the fulness of our apostolical power, suppress and abolish the said company: we deprive it of all activity whatever. …And to this end a member of the regular clergy, recommendable for his prudence and sound morals, shall be chosen to preside over and govern the said houses; so that the name of the Company shall be, and is, for ever extinguished and suppressed.” [Pope Clement IV, in 1773].
“The period following the Restoration of the Jesuits in 1814 was marked by tremendous growth, as evidenced by the large number of Jesuit colleges and universities established during the 19th century. During this time in the United States, 22 of the society’s 28 universities were founded or taken over by the Jesuits. It has been suggested that the experience of suppression had served to heighten orthodoxy among the Jesuits. While this claim is debatable, Jesuits were generally supportive of papal authority within the church, and some members became associated with the Ultramontanist movement and the declaration of Papal Infallibility in 1870.” [Wikipedia]
All the same, reverting to the tweet above, with the nun, it is true that the population of the world is too high, by far. However, while numbers should be reduced, what is equally important is that the proportion of white Northern Europeans be far far higher than it presently is.
As I have been saying, blogging, and tweeting (when I still had a Twitter account, before the Jews had me expelled in 2018) for years.
All part of the transnational propaganda campaign being waged by the conspirators of evil. All part of the “comms” for the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan. Look at pretty much any TV show, TV ad, poster ad…whatever. This is a massive international campaign to destroy the white race by mixing it heavily with the blacks and browns. Not race alone; culture, our European culture, will also not survive, unless we start to fight for it.
The Chinese are already infiltrating by mercantile activity, farming etc. Soon Chinese will replace Russians unless Moscow starts to actually do something to stop that. Siberia generally is almost empty, and that is particularly so the further east and north we look. An open door.
Must try that at some future time, maybe c.2040, with the British police: “I’ll have almost-burnt rye toast, butter, red caviar, with dill and sliced non-vinegar pickled cucumber on the side, and some iced Moskovskaya vodka, served in very small glasses, please“. Well, might be worth a try…
It would be a mistake to imagine that the above and other madness (inc. “Black Lives Matter” nonsense, “Black History Month” the Greta Nut and other climate-related nonsense, the general repression of free speech, the “everyone can go to a ‘university’ and get a firstclass degree” etc) is happening by some kind of accident or co-incidence. No. There are secret groups pushing it all. They riddle our society like termites, and will only be removed by the methods appropriate to such infestation.
For the “refugees welcome” cretins, the answer is simple— “build more houses!” (so that endless more waves of invaders can be accommodated, so that England loses yet more open country and decent suburbia, and so that the UK becomes non-white quicker). Needless to say, most of these “refugees” will be entirely useless parasites, and their offspring as bad or worse.
All designed to “prove” a lie, i.e. that the UK, or at least London, was “multicultural” since the Middle Ages. It’s rubbish.
More from the new Australian multikulti, (((infested))), biosecurity police state. Victoria seems to be the harshest, but NSW is not far behind.
I dissent, not that it now matters directly, from the crazy policies of Churchill, but the man was still a titan overall, when compared to the part-Jew, part-Levantine chancer who now tries, pathetically, to imitate him. Marx was right: history is tragedy the first time, before being repeated as farce.
The whole Western world needs a thoroughgoing cultural purge. The infestation is rooted in one particular group, and it is not that of the blacks, as such…
An idea for the Westminster monkeyhouse? Would look funny at PMQs…
“Right-wing anti-Palestinian protesters“? Seems that Skwawkbox is casting around, trying to find the right words…how about “fanatical Zionist Jews“?
The “open letter” tweet relates to an Irish writer of whom I had not heard previously. I suppose that she could have permitted the translation (into Hebrew), but given all her royalties to poor Palestinians in Gaza. Though that would have broken the BDS code in principle, it would also have helped individuals, as well as providing amusement (Zionists paying money out to Gazans). One can get into arguments akin to the mediaeval “how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?”.
For myself I can only say, in the words of “the Mad Mahdi”, that “ten thousand angels shall precede me into battle“:
The cartoonist, Bob Moran, who has been one of few prominent voices of sanity in the past 20 for so months, has now been sacked by the Daily Telegraph (which always pretends to stand for free speech) at the behest of a mob of Twitter-twits.
I hope that some other journal will publish his cartoons, but in this age of “me too” political neo-orthodoxy, I am not hopeful. Even Private Eye is now one more msm mouthpiece for “me too” wokeness (in fact, and in my view, it always was, but it had the grace to conceal that in the 1970s and 1980s).
Bob Moran has tweeted the following, no doubt after some threat of legal or other action:
The public is slowly waking up to the fact that “the virus” has been weaponized by the System in the UK not only as an excuse for the arrogation of quasi-dictatorial laws and power, but also as an excuse for why the NHS is now ebbing away to being a kind of skeleton service. “Sorry, we cannot [fill in action not done] because of Covid”…
The present state of play re. the main System parties
What does it take to displace the part-Jew, part-Levantine chancer presently posing as Prime Minister? What does it take to depose the present “Conservative” government? Mass riots in the streets? Plagues of locusts? The waters of the Thames at Westminster turning blood-red?
So here we have Britain, and more particularly England, not only with recent petrol shortages (though I think that that particular storm has now broken and abated), but also with shortages of foodstuffs in the supermarkets, the NHS operating on a kind of skeleton basis, migration-invasion in the Channel continuing unchecked, and inflation (one of the entirely-foreseeable consequences of the 2020-21 Treasury Covid cash “giveaway”) rapidly increasing.
Even that is not a complete list. The HS2 vanity rail project continuing, with huge environmental loss, unemployment likely to increase before long despite recent optimistic figures, housing becoming even more of an issue, and no serious attempt to reform social care for the aged and infirm. A general slow slide in standards across the board.
All that (and more— think cronyism and corruption), yet Labour under Keir Starmer makes very little headway. Why?
In fact there have been a few opinion polls, over the past 6 months, placing Labour alongside or even ahead of the Conservatives, but not many. In any event, the leader of a party is arguably the most important factor in any general election in the UK.
Starmer’s strong suits? “Cares about people“; “in touch [with the masses]”. I seem to remember that Jeremy Corbyn scored even better on those aspects, not long before Labour crashed at the 2019 General Election.
Exactly. That last tweeter has hit the nail on the head. There has to be a coherent plan to solve the problems of the UK. Not an over-detailed “fully costed” accountant’s plan, but a general yet clear way forward. This is where Labour is failing.
As said previously by both me and others, Starmer’s appeal goes something like “we support the government’s reintroduction of 19thC workhouses, but they must be run more efficiently, fairer, while both wearing a facemask and bending the knee to the blacks.”
There is nothing much in Starmer-Labour to appeal to voters. What is offered is pretty much the same as offered by the Conservative Party: the same (or stricter) “virus” nonsense, the same (or stricter) real-terms cuts to State benefits and pensions, the same (or worse) mass non-white immigration.
In fact, Starmer-Labour’s only real points are “we would be more efficient than the Conservatives” (maybe, maybe not) and —Labour’s best point— “we are not the Conservative Party“. Labour hopes that, in a binary political system, enough people will want “Boris” out for them to vote Labour. Doubtful.
As a strategy, the above is pretty pathetic, but it is all that they have.
Tweets about the party-political state of play
Maybe so, but the Conservative Party is very entrenched in England, especially in most of the south of England. A diminution of support from voters would have to be large to have any effect at all on the overall state of play.
Incredible, looking at the mess the “Boris” NWO/ZOG regime is producing, but perception is all. For many voters, Labour still looks hopeless on the economy, even if it is no worse than the present pack of idiots.
Of course, Labour is now again under the thumb of the Jewish lobby (Starmer himself has a Jewish wife, and their children are being brought up as if fully-Jewish), but that fact alone does not make Labour any more pro-Jewish lobby or pro-Israel than the completely-suborned Conservative Party, 80% of the MPs of which belong to Conservative Friends of Israel.
In any case, for most voters, all that is “caviar to the general”, meaning over their heads. No significant political resonance.
I wonder whether there will be a “mass disobedience” event, as thousands start setting off fireworks in Trafalgar Square and Whitehall. That would have its “health and safety” risks, but would also be exciting.
As I have repeatedly blogged and (before the Jews removed my Twitter account in 2018) tweeted, what is happening is the preparation of NWO/ZOG for the next 33-year cycle, from 2022 to 2055. It is now in preparation.
Remember 1989, the last such key year? The older readers of my blog will. Socialism collapsed openly (having been collapsing for years) that year. The Berlin Wall came down. The socialist states of Europe became effectively finance-capitalist. Even the Soviet Union itself, though it limped on in name for another two years.
This seemed to be relatively quick, but had been in preparation for years. When Gorbachev came to the UK in, I think, 1984, and “Madame Hatchet” (Margaret Thatcher) proclaimed him as someone “with whom the West could do business”, that was a statement of literal truth.
In China, after 1989, socialism also collapsed, though some outward forms were kept up (the same was true of Cuba, Vietnam etc).
Now the international conspiracy-consensus is moving to its next 33-year agenda. By 2055, the world around us will be at least as different from today as 2021 is from 1988.
We have every right to do whatever we like, or have to, in order to reclaim our birthright.
Note that, on YouTube, the above audio post has had over 6,000 positive votes since May of this year, with only 112 negative votes…
Little Matt Hancock got his reward from the transnational conspiracy, it seems.
I am tempted to say “the whoosh and rattle as the guillotine claims another victim“!…but I suppose “the sound of the wind in the walnut trees” is more poetic…
A sad story, but also not sad. I hope that some time, in some way, they will all meet again.
The “global warming”/”climate change” narrative goes back even further, to at least 1977, when a very alarmist documentary was screened in the UK. I myself missed it, because I was in Rhodesia at the time. Still, I also missed the ridiculous Queen’s Silver Jubilee nonsense, so cannot complain…(#Winning!). I read a paperbook book about the documentary and the ideas and political background behind it (the book was very taken with the “global warming” theory), about a year later.
My view has not changed over the past 20 years when the “climate change” narrative has become a large part of international policy. It is that forms of climate change have occurred (irrespective of human input) since the Earth existed in anything like its present form.
It is known, historically, that is to say in the past few thousand years, that the climate (eg in the UK) has warmed and cooled at times, well before industrialization and also before there was a vast population on the Earth.
That is not to say that climate change is not happening. In some areas of the world, it is noticeable even by the public (eg the fact that Eastern Australia is far hotter now than it was when I was there in the late 1960s).
It is unsurprising that young people, anyone under 20 or so certainly, are very taken with the narrative pumped out by those running the narrative, and controlling the likes of Greta Nut. The proven frauds by the IPCC from 10-15 years ago (Himalayan Glaciers disappearing by 2020, Indian rivers drying up, the Kilimanjaro snows etc etc) will have escaped most of those young people.
Causation of climate change is not really known; some seeming causes are doubtful; remedies, if any, more doubtful yet.
In fact, within bounds, and overall, global cooling would be far worse than global warming; the history of past centuries shows that.
The “climate change” narrative as a whole is being used (as is “the global pandemic” story) to force through socio-political changes on a vast scale, in preparation for the next 33-year cycle beginning in 2022.
There should be far fewer people on the Earth. That is true, and will probably be the case before very long. A population of about a quarter or even a tenth of the present would be good, especially if mainly European.
Best idea: not to have sub-Saharans in the UK or even part of Europe.
Don’t forget the part-Jew, part-Levantine chancer currently posing as Prime Minister.
Migration-invasion. The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan in action, flooding the UK with backward elements.
Interesting and, indeed, alarming, if true.
I remember some of those Jack Hargreaves TV programmes. Early 1970s. Don’t think that they were all children’s TV as such, though.
Despite Hargreaves reminiscing on TV about his modest childhood, he actually attended a fee-paying school; as for his “country old folk” persona on those TV shows, he was also a director of a small TV station and, earlier, editor of magazines, including the once-popular Picture Post. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Hargreaves.
A lucky escape
If those magistrates are interested, I think that I have a London bridge to sell them!
The fact is that, especially in the lower courts, there are sometimes perverse verdicts and/or decisions. I imagine that all barristers will be able to recall some from their own experience. I (wrongfully disbarred in 2016) certainly do recall a few.
However, I am not sure that the above verdict is actually perverse, when looked at more closely.
Disappointingly, the Daily Telegraph account is less informative than that of the Daily Mail. The Mail reports the key factor in the decision of the magistrates, i.e. that, given that the defendant did drink a considerable amount in the hour after the crash, the court was unwilling to infer that she was above the legal limit at the material time.
Frankly, while that verdict might not have been actually “perverse”, in my view it was still wrong. The court had plenty of credible evidence before it to support a “Guilty” verdict, in my view. The victim was “credible“, the defendant “misleading” and her Pakistani friend “incredible“, in the words of the magistrates. She had therefore been drinking while driving.
The details of the crash itself, together with the evidence of the victim, fully support an inference that, beyond any reasonable doubt, the defendant was over the legal limit while driving. A guilty verdict would have been better. She was lucky.
On the wider sociological point, one trembles for Britain when there are so many drunken sluts like her driving around. It goes beyond the simple road safety aspect. Even her friend and (possibly perjuring) witness, presumably a Muslim at least by origin, seems to have had a litre of vodka at hand! Britain. 2021.
This is not something about which I have strong feelings either way, but one does not have to turn to the Old Testament to see that liaisons between older men and younger women, even with age gaps of 20 or 30 years, are not uncommon in many parts of the world. In fact, they are not terribly unusual even in the UK and other parts of Europe today. Some such liaisons are sanctified by marriage rituals, others take place covertly.
What occurs to me is that the attitudes of society, at least in the UK, and perhaps mainly among the kind of people who scribble for newspapers, have changed. Today, in the UK, as compared to, say, the UK of the 1970s, 1950s, or 1850s, an approved msm figure (David Hare is Sir David Hare) can describe an age-gap relationship as “disgusting” and “wrong“, but woe betide anyone who used such a description to describe (or condemn) a sexual relationship between two men, or two women, or between persons of radically different races or nationalities…
In the end, this is a question to which (in my opinion) there is no “answer”, except that given by individuals, and also by the society in which those individuals live. I do not think that there is one right answer for all places and all times.
Tweets on that topic
Other David Hare views
I agree —in part— with Hare about the way in which the BBC gradually lost its Reithian “inform, educate, and entertain” basis.
Hare says that “news” (much of it the BBC acting as a government mouthpiece) has displaced everything else. I hear what Hare says about that, but for me, while I can agree with what he says about BBC News, the BBC long ago put “entertainment” (and pathetically poor much of it is) before the informing and educating of the public.
Whatever. The BBC is now pretty poor and possibly unsalvageable without the sacking of most of its staff.
In fact, the kefuffle at Sussex University, and the general madness around “trans” this or that, is what happens when the anti-free-speech genie is let out of the bottle…
It seems that the Welsh Government is going to continue to force people in Wales to wear facemasks (and to work from home) until 2022. I think that central (UK) government should cut what amounts to its subsidy to Wales. They (the Welsh Government, not the people) want to make choices that make Wales less efficient? Fine, but the UK will not subsidize the economic consequences of those choices.
Translation: “I hate free speech and freedom of expression by those who stand up for European race and culture.”
This week, I scored 7/10, thus again beating political journalist John Rentoul, who scored 6/10. I admit that two of my answers were educated guesses. I did not know the answers to questions 1, 5, and 9.
Outside some major ports and a few urban enclaves, well into the 1960s if not 1970s. I know. I was there.
A few points: firstly, I have been saying for 10+ years that Britain should get closer to Russia in every way, thus —inter alia— preserving our energy security at affordable price levels.
Secondly, Russia in 2021 is not the Soviet Union. It has no hostile ideology or any “take over the world” gameplan. In fact, that was not really, after 1945, or 1953 (death of Stalin), or from the 1970s, the intention of even the Soviet leadership, despite the superpower rivalry that existed.
Thirdly. Britain needs energy whatever. Russia can provide it.
I met Darius Guppy once, in early 2017, when he attended the now-defunct London Forum run by Jez Turner [Jeremy Bedford-Turner, later persecuted and prosecuted by Jewish pressure groups, and imprisoned].
Darius Guppy (who may have been aware that I had reviewed his book) approached me after I had given my talk about freedom of expression (ironically, the video of my talk is itself censored online…); we spoke briefly. He seemed a pleasant fellow. I understand that he now lives near Cape Town. I would not be surprised to discover that his adventurous life continues to be adventurous.
Strangely enough, I recall dining with some Persians in London, an elderly lady, her two sons, and a few other people, the family being exiles (the father of the men and husband of the lady had been executed by the Ayatollah’s regime soon after the fall of the Shah). Guppy was in the news at the time (early 1990s). The lady had known Shusha Guppy, and recalled Darius Guppy when young as “a nice young boy“. He certainly seemed, on meeting him, likeable, on the face of it.
Hitchens, despite having been a journalist —a real one, unlike the majority calling themselves such— for decades, still seems (probably only seems) surprised at the gap between actual reality and a propaganda message saying something else. cf. “racial equality” and “anti-sexism” campaigns etc.
Sometimes I wonder which is more deluded: the general public, lapping up the lies put out by the System drones on the msm, or the System drones themselves.
That particularly applies to those groups (eg the blacks generally) proven to be genetically-predisposed —far more than Europeans— to certain types of mental illness (eg schizophrenia).
I am no medic, and so was surprised to hear this morning that the widespread and debilitating condition ME is now classified as, or as part of, or as similar to “Long Covid”. Is that true? Not an area where I know a lot about the subject.