I agree, though there is room for small or limited exceptional cases.
About 10 years ago (and on the blog from about 7 years ago), I was suggesting that Burnham might lead Labour. He is not there yet, but is circling ever-nearer as the Starmer-stein misgovernment looks like finally crashing and burning.
Air defense forces intercepted and destroyed 22 Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles over Russian regions and the Azov Sea during the past night, Russia’s Defense Ministry reported:https://t.co/P44vblx5Bdpic.twitter.com/OxkwjyRgF5
The number of civilians killed in the Ukrainian army’s drone attack on a cafe and a hotel in the village of Khorly in the Kherson Region has risen to 28, Governor Vladimir Saldo said:https://t.co/IFIwUGXgvXpic.twitter.com/tOcOtjO2Mb
I have no idea whether or not she is a dual Israeli/UK passport-holder. Probably, in my opinion.
“UKLFI is known for launching numerous legal claims against what it sees as anti-Israel activities, sometimes described as “lawfare”.[4] It challenged the UK Government over its suspension of 30 arms export licences to Israel and raised a complaint about the International Criminal Court’s seeking of arrest warrants against Israeli ministers.[4]“
[Wikipedia]
As to “lawfare” by UKLFI (and other Jew-Zionist organizations in the UK, see below. UKLFI was the complainant in 2014 when I was wrongfully and (it later turned out) actually unlawfully disbarred in 2016.
In 2014, UKLFI put up some broken-down Jew-Zionist barrister (of whom I had never previously heard), a denizen of the heavily-Jewish Hampstead Garden Suburb, to make the official complaint against me. That Jew in fact never made an appearance at the Bar Disciplinary Tribunal itself (a polite and not unreasonable barrister from the Bar Standards Board conducted the quasi-trial “prosecution” before a 5-person panel chaired by a retired Circuit Judge), but the said Jew did draft a considerable amount of preliminary paperwork, letters etc.
“UKLFI”, like the notorious “Campaign Against Antisemitism” [“CAA”], operates out of a postbox, its real address kept secret.
The UK has to clear out these Israel snoopers and abusers of English law and procedure. They are effectively arms of the Israeli Embassy in London, and of the State of Israel. See below for my account of the matter and related matters:
and (relating to my free speech trial of 2023-2024, procured by the lying and perjuring “CAA”, another arm of the Jewish/Israel “lawfare” conspiracy in England):
I notice that the “CAA” and “UKLFI” still share a number of members or supporters, including some “patrons”, officials etc. One is “Baroness” Deech, who at the time of the 2014 complaint of “UKLFI” to the Bar Standards Board about me, was not only a “Patron” of “UKLFI” but also the head of…the Bar Standards Board!
A telling example of how “they” worm their way in, subverting law and rights.
After my wrongful and unlawful disbarment of 2016, “UKLFI” mainly shut up about me, except for a comment in the Press by the old Jew barrister who had signed-off on the original complaint, but the “CAA” took up the slack, starting to crow about me and about my having been disbarred. The liar and perjurer Gideon Falter, head of the malicious “CAA” org, was immediately on the telephone to compliant newspaper scribblers about me.
Once you allow a group, consisting of citizens and fervent supporters of an alien foreign power, to interfere with and abuse your laws, you might as well be a colonized subject-state, which is in fact, or in effect, what Britain has become.
More music
More tweets seen
No foreign influence should be in our government and institutions. None whatsoever – and I’m glad Rupert has even mentioned Israel in this. Most politicians are too scared to name them. https://t.co/leM6TVQmVL
Watching the fourth Bridget Jones and when you watch them all back to back, our demographic replacement sticks out like a sore thumb as the franchise continues.
Very true. Compare the original Inspector Morse (1987-2000) with both the (filmed much later— 2006-2015) Lewis, and then Endeavour (2013-2023).
Endeavour, set the earliest (1960s, then early/mid 1970s) but filmed last, is replete with blacks and other non-whites, despite that being totally ahistorical. I knew Berkshire and, to a lesser extent, Oxfordshire, as a child of the 1960s [b.1956]; even in the 1970s, Oxford was almost entirely white British, even at the University.
Inspector Morse, set in, and filmed in, the late 1980s and the 1990s, does not have very many non-white characters.
Russian troops liberated the community of Bondarnoye in the Donetsk region over the past 24 hours in the special military operation in Ukraine, Russia’s Defense Ministry reported:https://t.co/V9f5B8YSxJpic.twitter.com/9bVbhGQN7V
Trump, like many of his predecessors, is reviving the Monroe Doctrine.
The key fact seems to be that Venezuela still has huge oil reserves, far greater even than Saudi Arabia.
Late tweets
I’d like to hear Starmer explain how this benefits the UK. There are no economic benefits and they certainly do not outweigh the societal impacts. MPs are delusional if they think otherwise. One can only assume there is an ulterior motive; buying voters.
Well, this week 5/10, thus beating political journalist John Rentoul, who scored 3/10. I knew the answers to questions 1, 4, 6, 7, and 10. I should have also got question 8, but did not, and question 2 has, in my view, at least three possible answers. Still, there it is.
Talking point
I was just looking at a cartoon, and comment, that I posted on 14 October 2020, so just over 5 years ago.
This was the cartoon:
and this was the comment:
“Keir Starmer, who has inherited the leadership of a once semi-socialist (then social-democratic) party which is now just a bad joke. Keir Starmer, freemason and Labour Friends of Israel member, who seems (slightly to my surprise) to be utterly clueless…“
The [Israeli] Jews have done that over a period of 2 years (supported by their “fifth column” in the UK and USA and elsewhere), and have killed or badly wounded —over 69,000 actually killed so far— about a quarter of a million Gazan Arab people, mostly civilians, mostly women and children. Why? Because Hamas operatives invaded Israeli territory (i.e. land stolen or seized from 1948) on one day in 2023, resulting in the deaths of (or injury to) between 500 and 1,500 Jews (many of them, though, were killed by the Israeli war machine itself, and many of them were uniformed or other military and police personnel).
Look at the huge disproportion. This goes well beyond, hugely beyond, any talk of “a pound of flesh” etc. The ratio of disproportion is somewhere around 250 to 1. Also, the time disproportion— one day as against over two years, a ratio of about 750 to 1.
When the “postponed” elections in parts of England are held, both Lab and Con are going to be stamped into the ground, where they belong.
As I blogged yesterday, the “Labour” vote at Caerphilly was less than a quarter of what it had been at the previous election; the “Conservative” vote was about one-eighth of what it had previously been.
Apply that to English Westminster constituencies.
To believe, as a few msm commentators seem to believe (e.g. Dan Hodges) that one or both System parties can somehow suddenly become (even superficially) “credible” now, is clutching at straws. The same goes for the idea that Reform UK support has “plateaued“.
Well maybe, maybe not, but even if it has, that level is still between 25% and 36% (its best so far, only a week ago), and that is enough, even if Reform and the Lab/Con parties all get 25% each (and at present Lab and Con are both below 20%), to give Reform a plurality of Commons seats (around 215), though not a majority.
Indeed, were Reform to “plateau” at 30%, with Lab and Con on 20% each, Reform would get about 384 seats (a very good majority), Lab about 94, and the Cons around 40 (the Cons just below both the LibDems and the SNP).
When Corbyn was leader Labour won Caerphilly with 22,491 votes (54.5% vote share). Starmer has just lost the seat, which had been held by Labour for over a hundred years, with 3,713 votes (11% vote share). This result suggests no Labour seat is safe while Starmer is leader. pic.twitter.com/8giGhB8aOD
— Damian from Brighton #YourParty (@damian_from) October 24, 2025
As Macmillan said, “events, dear boy, events!” Continuing migration invasion on a vast scale (hundreds, even thousands, daily, and they are just the illegals…); housing crisis (one consequence of mass immigration). Also, sliding standards in almost all areas of society, and a whole list of other issues.
More music
More tweets
How Jess Phillips can remain in post after presiding over this bungled shitshow is a mystery. And as usual the vacuous narcissist has managed to make it all about her not the victims.
Jess Phillips has not the brain to head or chair anything at all. Just a freeloading, expenses-blodging know-nothing loudmouth who, in a better society, would be harvesting Brussels sprouts, or stacking shelves.
My assessment of Jess Phillips from 2019, with updates dating to earlier this year:
The second is from all 6 survivors switalskis represent both on the panel and 2 that have resigned, outlining the concern both from on the panel and that led to people leaving the panel. pic.twitter.com/7hgIXsCGEj
"Five survivors have now left the inquiry, with some claiming that behind the scenes Labour Ministers have been trying to downplay the racial and religious aspects of the scandal —as indeed they have done for the last 30 years."https://t.co/bORgdg0AVc
This is why I don’t buy Janan Ganesh’s hypothesis we’re angry at failure over asylum because we’re spoiled by Netflix & Uber. Govt expects so much of us, it concedes so little, fines pile up if honest citizens makes honest mistakes, yet if govt itself makes deadly errors? Nothing https://t.co/MXoDvRVhfI
The Labour Deputy Leadership election was a referendum on Keir Starmer's leadership. And his own party members have delivered their verdict. We're entering the endgame now.
Russian troops struck Ukrainian military-industrial and energy sites over the past 24 hours in the special military operation in Ukraine, Russia’s Defense Ministry reported on Saturday:https://t.co/ehHAAzBSAupic.twitter.com/jATXQo7mIv
The Ukrainian army’s defense in the southern and southeastern parts of Krasnoarmeysk in the Donetsk region collapsed, a source in Russian defense circles told TASS:https://t.co/ZxX3ENljBhpic.twitter.com/j8RpJ9xFCQ
“...an AI safety research company has said that AI models may be developing their own “survival drive”.
…leading AI models – including Google’s Gemini 2.5, xAI’s Grok 4, and OpenAI’s GPT-o3 and GPT-5 – were given a task, but afterwards given explicit instructions to shut themselves down.
Certain models, in particular Grok 4 and GPT-o3, still attempted to sabotage shutdown instructions in the updated setup. Concerningly, wrote Palisade, there was no clear reason why.
“The fact that we don’t have robust explanations for why AI models sometimes resist shutdown, lie to achieve specific objectives or blackmail is not ideal,” it said.
“Survival behavior” could be one explanation for why models resist shutdown, said the company. Its additional work indicated that models were more likely to resist being shut down when they were told that, if they were, “you will never run again”.
Andrea Miotti, the chief executive of ControlAI, said Palisade’s findings represented a long-running trend in AI models growing more capable of disobeying their developers. He cited the system card for OpenAI’s GPT-o1, released last year, which described the model trying to escape its environment by exfiltrating itself when it thought it would be overwritten.
This summer, Anthropic, a leading AI firm, released a study indicating that its model Claude appeared willing to blackmail a fictional executive over an extramarital affair in order to prevent being shut down – a behaviour, it said, that was consistent across models from major developers, including those from OpenAI, Google, Meta and xAI.“
[Guardian]
That should be major news.
Late tweets
Sarah Pochin MP: “It drives me mad seeing adverts full of black and Asian people.”
Translates to a Commons with about 382 Reform MPs, 95 Lab MPs, 56 LibDems, 45 SNP, 23 Cons, 12 Greens [etc].
A very solid Reform majority.
Senior Tory MPs think Katie Lam is plotting with Dom Cummings to remove Kemi Badenoch after the local elections. And they want her stop > Mail Plus > https://t.co/WXAvPYbgv5
"The London Metropolitan Police, has just confirmed it will no longer investigate ‘non-crime hate incidents’ so that police officers can ‘focus on matters that meet the threshold for criminal investigations’."https://t.co/VA4vY2FQSc
Now stop pandering to the Jewish/Israel lobby and, in particular, the malicious liars and perjurers of the so-called “Campaign Against Antisemitism”— “Slitherman”, Falter etc.
One sometimes hears contestants on quiz shows asked “which BBC radio drama series was started in order to inform farmers about what they should be doing?” Answer: The Archers. What is less well-known is that the same method is now used across the mass media and especially on TV to push the “multiracial society”.
I am not an avid or regular watcher of TV soaps such as Emmerdale. However, I have noticed on odd occasions over the years that such serial dramas or melodramas are being used to push the multiracial/multicultural society which has been a major part of the System gameplan for many decades.
Gradually, black and brown characters are introduced, to the extent that these rural communities (such as that portrayed in Emmerdale) have to have blacks, Asians (as well as gays, lesbians, drug-abusers, mixed-race relationships etc) to a far greater extent than exist in any real country village. A few years ago, “activists” complained that there were no blacks and browns in Midsomer Murders. Guess what? There now are…
The above nonsense is not confined to TV soaps, either…
The wish to virtue-signal the usual rubbish about “inclusivity” etc reaches a high level (I hesitate to say “apotheosis”) in the period dramas such as Inspector George Gently, Grantchester, Endeavour etc. I was born in 1956 (in Reading, Berkshire), was living in those years right on the Berkshire/Oxfordshire border and the only black person I can remember even seeing in the early 1960s was the NHS ear, nose and throat consultant whom I attended a few times aged about 7, at the Royal Berkshire Hospital (he was from the Caribbean). Yet if you were to watch, say, Grantchester, there are blacks and South Asians etc (not to mention gays) aplenty in that little Cambridgeshire village c.1950! The same is true of, say, Endeavour, the prequel to Inspector Morse.
Why is all this important? Because people who were not around in this or that year of the past get at least some of their ideas of that past time from such dramas shown on TV, or in the cinema. Why else would Hollywood Jews such as Spielberg continually make films showing a basically untrue picture of the Second World War? They want to imbue the public with certain (fake) “facts” and so affect and influence socio-political thoughts, words and actions today. Those who live in the British countryside today know that the real percentage of black and brown residents there is small; the number of inter-racial relationships or marriages even smaller, perhaps vanishingly so. Yet day after day, the British TV audience is washed over with waves of falsity in this regard. Brainwashing in slow time.
Then there are the TV ads. The brainwashing here has become so blatant that quite a number of people on social media, and who are the opposite of social-national in political attitude, have protested; even a couple of (Labour) MPs have said that it is absurd that pretty much every ad now seems to show a mixed-race family or an inter-racial one (usually with a black man as “father figure” or “husband”, and an English —i.e. white— woman, often blonde, as “mother”/”wife”). Sainsbury’s, Halifax, you name it. There are dozens of examples, so many that it cannot be mere co-incidence…
Why? Well, we have to start with the fact that media studies courses at universities and colleges, particularly in the large cities, attract rather many Jewish students, who are usually actively “anti-racist” (except in terms of their own arrogant Jewish-Zionist “racism”, which is often ingrained). Those students go on to join TV companies, ad agencies etc. Also, less obviously, there are secret or occult forces working behind the scenes to push what is sometimes termed the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan or agenda [see Notes, below]. When the whole advertising industry comes up with almost identical ads, something is going on.
Take a look at the Halifax ad at the foot of this blog post: black “father”/”husband”, white “wife”, in an advanced state of pregnancy.
It must be emphasized that these ads (and soaps etc) do not just reflect UK society but are designed to create a new —multiracial, “multicultural”— society. Multiracial families of the sort shown in countless ads do exist but are relatively rare. The aim of the ads and the soaps and other presentations is to normalize inter-racial relations, mixed-race offspring and, ultimately, to destroy the white Northern European race or ethnicity; in the UK, in mainland Europe, throughout the world.
The infected areas of our society have to be purged or cleansed; this type of evil propaganda must be rooted out wherever found.
The evil must be stopped in its tracks.
Finally, it probably has to be pointed out that the aim of social-nationalism is not to promote “hate” (as the Zionists and their mindless “antifa” dupes tend to aver) but to create the conditions necessary for a quantum leap of the advanced part of the human species. This could never be accomplished out of a mixed-race or non-European population. There has to be the right ethnic foundation. That is why the forces of Evil oppose us.
A Nigerian working in advertising in the UK actually admits that I am right, in effect:
“Greater diversity
This year, amidst the discussion in the industry about whether “Buster the boxer” orWes Anderson won Christmas, one important aspect of the seasonal campaigns has been largely overlooked – their diversity.
There wasn’t much variation to the themes, which typically revolved around traditional subjects such as family gatherings, celebrations, and (surprise, surprise) the joy of giving. However the diversity of people featured in the ads themselves stood out. For example, this year’s John Lewis campaign wasn’t just a departure for the brand because it was funnier than usual; it featured a black family for the first time. Currys PC World also cast a black family for its ad. Sainsbury’s animated tale featured a family of mixed ethnicities. Boots showcased a diverse array of women who work on Christmas day. Not to be outdone, Amazon portrayed the charming friendship of a Christian priest and a Muslim imam.
The John Lewis Christmas ad featured a black family for the first time
That wasn’t all. This year’s House of Fraser’s Christmas ad looked more like a Beyoncé video and M&S made Mrs Claus the star of its campaign. Meanwhile Pret A Manger produced a no-frills spot to highlight their apprenticeship scheme for the homeless, featuring a woman from an ethnic minority background who was forced out onto the streets by her own community because of her sexuality.
Step in the right direction
While it is easy to get cynical about these things, I see it as welcome progress. Diversity has been one of the hottest topics in advertising over the last year, with increasing calls for a more representative industry. Initiatives such as the Great British Diversity Experiment sought to prove that greater diversity leads to better creativity. If these Christmas campaigns are anything to go by, it seems that the message is getting through…
In post-Brexit Britain these ads also send out a covertly political message. Much of the marketing communications industry was in shock after the vote to leave the EU, with many wondering if more could have been done to counteract the negative sentiment that emerged during the referendum campaign.”
In other words, the people behind these ads promoting “diversity” (black-brown monoculture and the trashing of our European society, in reality) have a distinct socio-political agenda and their output is only incidentally selling this or that bank, supermarket etc; the ads are poisonous socio-political propaganda using “commercial cover”. More than that, these traitors to Europe’s peoples and future are acting in concert. Consensus. Conspiracy.
One “Matthew Chapman” on the same subject:
“The festive ad offerings from John Lewis, M&S and Morrisons all feature multi-ethnic families, while Sainsbury’s and Tesco show a wide range of people from different races and religions. Debenhams, meanwhile, created a film that reimagines the Cinderella love story and stars a black man and white woman.“
(He seems to like the fact that a traditional European tale has been trashed).
I want to know why on practicality every British TV advert we have a Mixed race family ? What is all this propaganda about ITV Channel 4 Channel 5. This is pure anti whiteism against the British population and insults intelligence. This is NOT a racist tweet just a question?
A reader of my blog who lives in Argentina writes recently by way of comment:
“Yes, Ian, I remember reading it [the article above]. Very good, as usual.
Strangely enough, Mark Collett made a video showing that some of the biggest retailers in the UK modified their diversity-driven Christmas’ ads last December as a consequence of negative comments they got from customers over the 2018 Christmas campaign that was full of blacks and browns.
Having said that, the majority of whites in the UK, like those in Australia or the US, are brainwashed idiots unwilling to react. I think it is a sign of the times.
Regarding that English Civil War memorial [in Worcester] vandalized by the BLM crowd, I agree with you. The brainless morons must have believed that it was about the US Civil War, showing their colossal ignorance, but what can you expect from riff-raff like that? That is “progressive” (Marxist) education for you.“
Ian Robert Millard 